The Manchester "Attack"

0  2017-05-29 by AcidCube

Why do people buy this bullshit? People are so easily manipulated that it's honestly pathetic. Maybe it's just easy for me from watching so many videos of people actually being blown up, shot, stabbed, or in actual life threatening situations that instinctually I can tell if something doesn't "look right". Or maybe a majority of people are just stupid? I mean the behavior of many of these crisis actors in the interviews should be a dead giveaway alone. Or the lack of urgency at the site of the 'explosion'. Or the fact that there's never video footage of these 'suicide bombers' and they're always outside the main event. Or the fact that there's always these high quality, pretty pictures of the "injured". I saw no gashes, no holes, broken limbs, just fake blood and bandages. The footage of the 'explosion' site shows no dead bodies, nothing.

It doesn't even bother me as much that they orchestrate these false flags as much as the people who believe they're real without question. If people weren't so damn gullible, these false flags would mean nothing. But the government uses these false flags to push laws and take away our rights, and people let them because they're scared and ignorant.

91 comments

A bomb definitely went off, and people definitely died. A close friend of mine knew someone who died.

I don't believe you.

That's fine, but I'm telling the truth. The guy who died was on an episode of Come Dine With Me.

I actually found that pretty interesting, but after watching the interview with his parents (if those are his parents) I'm back to my initial interpretation that it was faked. For one he could easily change his name and live elsewhere. But the reaction of his parents is very unconvincing. They don't even care.

And by 'know', I'm assuming you mean saw on TV?

No, by "know" I mean that a friend of mine knows him personally and was supposed to go travelling with him in the summer.

That's very convenient, isn't it? Of the 7 billion people on this planet.

You think it's odd that in all of the developed world (far less than the 7 billion in the world as a whole), on a site predominantly American and British, someone knows a person connected to a victim of an attack that killed 22?

Come back when you pass basic high school statistics.

lol, I hope you're still in school bud, because you would have to be a complete moron to still not find those statistics unlikely.

Look up the Six Degrees of Separation. Apply it to a smaller scale such as this and you'll find what they're saying is completely plausible.

Nope, statistically unlikely.

So

You're an expert on statistics An expert on assessing injuries An expert on assessing human behaviour An expert on identifying actors

Anything else you want to add to your repertoire?

lol, the fact that you think you need to be an expert to work out those statistics, even to a vague level.

Go on then

If there's about 1.2 billion people in developed countries and each individual person knows about 600 people. There's a 1 in 2 million chance that each individual person would know a particular person and about a 1 in 91,000 chance a person would know one of 22 particular people.

It is not that simple at all for a few reasons

Firstly the flaws in your statistics which include not limiting the data to the UK and this '600 people' thing considering Hett was very well known.

Secondly here we were are talking about friend of a friend. The person you were talking to is the friend of the friend so you need to look at degrees of separation. You also need to take into consideration the user base of this website, and also the fact that the person you're talking to is more likely to click on this thread because they're a friend of a friend.

The odds of someone on this thread being a friend of a friend of a victim can't be limited to the simple math you've displayed.

I didn't say it was that simple. I said it was vague because vague is the best we're going to get, but the general figures are quite simple to reach. I figured you would pull a straw man, though. And we're not limiting the data to the UK because the person who claimed it isn't even from the UK. If it's a friend of a friend, you could divide that number by however many people the person actually communicates with on a regular basis.

Well I'm Irish, my friend lives in Liverpool which is quite close to Manchester.

Sarcasm?

Explain why they wouldn't just do it for real? If the people behind it are so nefarious etc. Alsopeople did die, look at the reaction of communities where some people there died

I never said these people staging the events are necessarily cold-blooded, but rather that they're trying to push political agendas which maybe they feel is for the greater good. With Sandy Hook it was gun control, with the Boston Bombing, it was the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act. However if they were cold-blooded, I'd assume it would draw too much attention from the families of the deceased.. similar to what happened with 9/11, but I'm not going to comment on that because I don't know enough about it. I'm not claiming to have all the answers, just a little common sense when it comes to reading people and the events taking place.

I've found no damning evidence that anyone died.

It would be easier to have a real bomb though.

What about the Scottish island where someone died? Unless you're claiming sturgeon was also complicit by sending specialists to help children on the island get through the grief? Surely a smaller event just with mancurians would have been far simpler

You're a crank mate. And this is an insult to everyone who died, everyone who is struggling to survive, and everyone who witnessed shit they should never have to witness.

You're a fucking idiot. No one died. Enjoy your police state. You deserve it.

Oh it must be exhausting living in that little brain of yours.

You're clearly the one on the autism spectrum.

Removed. Rule 4.

Removed. Rule 4.

Removed. Rule 4.

Oh you absolute fucking moron.

Some of us live there. Some of us work in the hospitals there.

The lack of urgency at the site? It was cornered off and we couldn't even get to people who were dying painful deaths because our emergency services weren't allowed straight away.

And pictures? Don't you think if this was fake that they'd provide as much 'evidence' as possible so there would be lots of photos?

People didn't take photos because they were fucking dying, injured, helping friends, in shock...

Were you in there yourself you dumb fucking cunt? Why do you think they were blocking off actual paramedics from going in there?

Also they've provided quite a bit of bullshit photos and 'evidence' but not related to actual injuries because that's too hard to fake, so by your own reasoning it is staged.

I treated the patients you absolute arsewipe.

They blocked it off because it's bloody procedure to do so. We had PLENTY of walking wounded brought to the hospital with the people stuck inside coming later. We diverted to neighbouring hospitals who got not as emergent walking wounded.

And how would showing actual injuries be too hard to fake yet a huge conspiracy involving destroying a train line, hiring hundreds of actors, destroying a centre piece of Manchester is easy peasy?

Use your brain.

You're full of fucking shit. Prove it. Prove you treated anyone that was at the site.

I can't as you know well I can't - I could lose my job and I respect my patients more than that.

You're the one making outlandish claims, you're the one who has zero proof that this is a conspiracy that involved people destroying millions of private and public property, hiring hundreds if not thousands of actors, controlling the media and emergency services, controlling the army...

It's easy to sit on your arse at home pondering with your foil hat on isn't it.

That's convenient isn't it, cunt? You didn't treat anyone that was supposedly injured by a bomb.

I've already demonstrated how easy it is for crisis actors to stage this kind of event and how emergency services and military services are dismissed for these events. And what the hell are you talking about, "millions of damage". Lol? Because someone threw a firecracker on the ground and a bunch of trash? The site looks absolutely fine.

But yeah, it's easy to sit on your ass believing everything you hear on TV, isn't it?

Convenient? No it's the law 😂😂

You haven't demonstrated shit. You've made ridiculous claims, that's it. No evidence to support this crap you've concocted.

Emergency services were not dismissed. They were ready and waiting on scene for the injured.

Millions of damage - have you seen the arena it happened in? No of course you haven't, because you're thousands of miles away but seem to think you know better than us who live here. Have you also seen the railway that was damaged to? Nope.

I don't believe everything I see on TV. I believe my eyes and ears. I believe the people I know personally.

Lol, you're such a dishonest cunt, it's absolutely pathetic. You said you weren't allowed in the arena, now you're telling me you know the damage that was caused within it. I saw the damage that was caused on video and there was no serious damage. Certainly no blast damage.

I didn't mean seen it post damage, I meant if you knew what it looked like you'd understand that damage to it would be costly and the revenue they've lost from having to cancel acts. The railway will probably be the most expensive and it's taking a while to fix.

Actually millions is probably an exaguration, it's probably more like hundreds of thousands.

That link doesn't show the supposed structural damage. I highly doubt there is any.

Anyways, here's the "blast scene". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L02C0bEjqdM

You can highly doubt what you want mate, I'm pretty sure the National Rail don't give a flying fuck about providing folk like you with proof.

Derpetite -- You are dealing with a sociopathic troll here.....and he's pulling you into his delusional tinfoil-hat world with glee...you really should stop feeding the troll. He is clearly unbalanced to come up with what amounts to extremely disrespectful and absurdly stupid claims.

Ah dude you're right you're completely right. I've been blinded by anger because it's just beggars belief. Off to delete comments, this is a pointless exercise and as you said i need to stop feeding the troll.

I have fallen into that trap too many times myself from getting so angry I could explode... so I certainly understand. It's particularly aggravating when some asshole with a twisted agenda (and serious need for attention) defames people who lost their lives...but you are right and I would delete the posts...If you respond to this I will also delete this as it is not worth getting into a useless conversation with an unhinged jerk.

Delete the evidence.

When you hear hooves think horses not zebras

If you look at separate images you'll see that the logo on the cap would have very likely been identifiable in the first image so was edited out - you can see a slight patch where it's supposed to be that doesn't look right. On the second image the logo cannot be seen properly so left.

That makes more sense than your ridiculous theory.

An identifiable logo edited out - since the first image (if you look at the larger ones) has a strange patch where the logo should be. That's one thing that makes more sense than your assertions

But do carry on. I'm not engaging with you anymore.

Why? I'm not being disrespectful, I just want to hear your input. You're actually right, you can zoom in with MS paint and see it's edited out. Good catch. I just found it strange.

How about this man's story? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TRC_YPpW0A

Ignore the bit at the end about not being able to walk on a fractured femur.

You're not being disrespectful now but the whole assertion is. You've already called me a liar because you seem to think I didn't help take care of those poor people. It's traumatic for all involved and I just won't discuss it anymore.

Thanks for your time.

I don't believe you helped anyone that was injured by a bomb because I've seen no evidence of an actual explosion. Maybe you assisted someone who was trampled or fell leaving the stadium.

I've actually provided you solid evidence of a crisis actor with a very inconsistent story and now suddenly you're refusing to acknowledge it.

You don't get shrapnel from being trampled, that's all I'm going to say.

So you're still refusing to acknowledge it. Is it because you don't have an explanation for it?

Thought so.

At least I have evidence for my claims. Where's yours?

https://youtu.be/smlCU_9a2iE?t=3m24s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGpxD_VRk4E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33FpCmO0tCA https://youtu.be/zP86dVpsV6k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TRC_YPpW0A

In one of those, she actually slips up and says it wasn't a bomb. But eh, honest mistake, right? Their acting is terrible nonetheless.

All things considered there is no reason to respond. You attack anyone who questions your absurd theories, you have been insulting and highly defensive with anyone who thinks, like most everyone here does, that your accusations are, to be polite, absurd.

End of discussion...but you will probably go on another snarky rant.

Either you're being dishonest or ignorant, but the only people I have attacked were those who personally attacked me. I'm completely open to people holding opposing beliefs. I think they're silly and baseless, but I'm not going to attack them for just for that. Go ahead, look through all the comments and show me a single person I attacked personally who did not personally attack me first.

You simply hold a bias, because anyone who is defensive, disrespectful, or insulting towards me is acceptable, but when I show the very same behavior, I'm a terrible person not worth having a discussion with. You've got to find some reason to dismiss my claims, right?

Deep breaths there, kiddo.

That tinfoil hat is getting to you.

Have some respect

Idiot.

Yeah, tell that to the loved ones of the people killed in Manchester.

Shame on you

You mean the crisis actors? Gladly.

Christ you're naive.

If you really wanted to test your theory you could actually go to Manchester and go to the chip shop owned by the parents of one of the girls who died.

Oh yeah? Do you know them personally, too?

Go back to infowars you disrespectful son of a bitch

Lick my asshole.

But I dont know you personally, do I?

You could be a crisis actor.

You haven't even given me evidence concluding you have an asshole.

Could be. I could be some rare reptilian species plotting to take over the world.

Nope. But it's in Leyland if you want to go visit, you'll know which one. Its the one with hundreds of flowers in front of it.

Thought so. I'm sure they appreciate their donations.

Removed. Rule 4. First warning.

You're free to disagree, but this is just pure ad hominem.

To be fair the reason why they probably held back the paramedics was to sweep and make sure there wasn't a second explosive device or what not

Bit of advice, take it or leave it: If you want people to wake up, you can't be an ass. Some of us lived many decades with this indoctrination and it's difficult to come out of that slumber. If someone is a total asshat about "the truth," people will just go back into their shells rather than being berated for simply being human.

Dude, we're ALL douped on something. Just because he's brainwashed on something different than you doesn't give you a license to be an asshole.

Absolutely not, but talking down to me and throwing insults my way certainly does.

No, no it doesn't and the sooner you learn that, the more rewarding life will be.

And in taking my own advice, I apologize for calling you several versions of an ass. It was childish, unproductive, and very inappropriate. My sincerest apologies.

Okay, my turn I guess. I apologize. I apologize that you're a condescending prick.

:P

Actually, I'd be a condescending bitch. ;)

Well fuck.

Also, I saw a video of the actual "bomb site" and there was a complete lack of emergency within the site. People casually talking and walking around.

Also there are thousands upon thousands of videos and photos online of actual crime scenes, terrorist events, injured people and dead bodies. Taking these photos is actually required by police. In fact, my neighbor used to do it himself and he'd tell me all kinds of fucked up stories.

Just because you haven't seen them doesn't mean they don't exist. Who are you to think you'd be automatically privy to all the crime scene photos? The only reason you have seen the ones of inside with the backpack etc is because the US managed to bloody leak them.

As for photos taken by bystanders, itwas inside a building. People inside weren't in any fit state to be taking photos.

Apparently they were because someone took a video of it and monetized it when they put it online for money. People were in no state of emergency whatsoever. No actual wounds. Nothing. Absolute joke, and you eat it up. It's idiots like you that are the reason our rights are being taken away one by one.

Maybe it's just easy for me from watching so many videos of people actually being blown up, shot, stabbed, or in actual life threatening situations that instinctually I can tell if something doesn't "look right"

LOL! God save us from armchair forensics.

Its astonishing isn't it. I see wounds including catastrophic ones day in day out as a surgical RN and even I wouldn't say something like this.

Dude's watched videos though, so maybe you're outclassed here.

I knew i was going wrong somewhere

Bro, I've watched every season of Dexter.

lol, god I'd hope not. You idiots will see some gauze with some ketchup on it and automatically assume it's a real injury.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so it's up to you to prove that it's a false flag.

It's very clear you're young and do not have experience. It's up to you to prove otherwise. This has been fun, thanks for the laugh.

In order for it to be an extraordinary claim, it would have to be an extraordinary event. Seeing as how this isn't an extraordinary event, it's up to you to demonstrate that it really took place. You've already demonstrated you're young by way of projection, so who knows, maybe you'll inadvertently figure something out.

Thanks for playing, buttercup.

Actually that was your words from yesterday shifted to be about this topic. It's funny that you aren't self-aware enough to catch that.

I have zero intention of having a conversation with you. You aren't here to talk to people or actually share your thoughts on anything. You're a angry little maladjusted person.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Actually that was your words from yesterday shifted to be about this topic. It's funny that you aren't self-aware enough to catch that.

Holy shit 😂

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Lol, you must not be familiar with the phrase because that's not something I came up with personally and I'm not the only person who uses it. It's actually a popular phrase started by Carl Sagan and often used to argue various topics, such as religion.

I am however intrigued that you claim not to have any intention of having a conversation with me, while simultaneously trying to have a conversation with me. You didn't only stop there, but you actually put in the effort by going through my profile.

I've actually been more than willing to share my thoughts with people however, I show people the same respect they show me. So I also find it interesting that I'm the only person being called out when I'm not the only person who has been throwing insults. Clearly there's some bias and cognitive dissonance taking place.

Chill out bro

I'm chill, bro.

What is 22 lives to them?

Entertainment.

I feel the same. It's frustrating to watch as people are so easily manipulated into fear and negative emotions.

I was brought up not far from tarleton where two of the dead are from. My step daughter knew one of the dead(An 18 year old) from a young age. Coincidentally, my cousin also knew her. Unless she's been a planted crisis actor since she was six, you're wrong. Unless you truly believe that twelve years ago, someone planted a young girl in a village and kept her there living a "normal" life until she was old enough to be blown up.

Also, there's a nearby town where the eight year olds parents own a takeaway, there's literally thousands of flowers outside it. So many people knew the parents and the child. Were the whole family plants for a decade in your eyes??

Not everything is a conspiracy. Sometimes bombs blow up and people die. For the sake of the poor families who've lost their loved ones, shut up.

What's her name?

I'll give you time to look it up.

I highly doubt all those flowers are from people that knew them. For all they knew, they could have never had a child. You can easily claim you lost a child in an attack, whether it be real or fake, you best believe there's going to be a bunch of flowers showing up at the doorstep.

Also, I'm well aware not everything is a conspiracy and people are actually blown up and killed. Brilliant straw man, it doesn't support your point in any way.

Yes people knew the young girl. She's not some fictional person. She existed. Her primary school put out a statement as well, or do you believe a school with a couple of hundred kids could make someone up to and no one would notice??

And you're right, I can't name the young girl. I was brought up round there but now live 75 miles away. But I can name gina. She was a member of the youth council, so there's loads of people right there that knew her. She went to the same college two of my cousins are currently at, one of them knew her personally and she's been out on nights out with my step daughter. Gina was a real person. You can believe this is all made up if you really want but there's real families mourning right now, at least have the decency to put some time between your inane ramblings and their losses.

You could say the same thing about the supposed victims of Sandy Hook, which has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have been staged. You have no explicit evidence to suggest that this girl existed or that a couple hundred kids knew she existed.

As for the 18 year old, that's the perfect age to change your name, move, and live on a huge chunk of cash. Hell, I would even find that tempting.

You can believe what you want and have your heart strings pulled, but I have no hard evidence to believe anyone actually died, and neither do you.

Yes but interestingly, you have no proof anyone didn't die.

As for people not having existed, dude, look up birth records. Although I'm guessing you'll believe that documents from decades ago have been forged or the people died and have no registered death so people could assume their identities... why let cold hard facts get in the way of your need to believe this didn't happen??

Maybe you're right, maybe they've all gone off to live on an island with Elvis...

You're the one making the positive claim that they did die, so the burden of proof lies on you. When there's no actual footage of the bombing, it's like proving God and unicorns don't exist. That's exactly why they don't provide footage of the 'bombing'.

I do however have explicit evidence of crisis actors telling inconsistent stories. So why don't you go ahead and explain to me why these people would lie.

Show me the birth records of the little girl that supposedly died. I already explained how easy it is for someone to change their name and live elsewhere, and this happens all the time. I suppose in your perfect little world this is impossible, and everyone is perfectly honest. So go ahead and compare real events with whacky conspiracy theories because it's clear that you have nothing to go by.

Here's proof that they Photoshopped a picture of the supposed "terrorist". http://imgur.com/a/zSSEb

If you notice the shadows, anyone with a basic understanding of how shadows are cast, will know he was Photoshopped in. This is Photoshop 101.

Now why would they do that?

Yeah, you are our supreme intelligence and beat everyone else hands down. Oi wish Oi was as intelligent as you and could see through such things.

Lol, that's just the thing.. it doesn't take supreme intelligence. It only takes a little common sense.

Fuck me, you can't even tell when someone's taking the piss out of you. Going far.

You're clearly not very smart. I'm well aware it was sarcasm, kiddo. That was the point.

Of course dude, kiddo, I haven't been called that for many years, thanks man. I feel young again, like your logic.

Absolutely. I bet you feel a whole two years younger.

Wow dud, you're so much too clever for me, I better just be quiet, your wit cuts me to the core. If you hadn't guessed, yes you are boring me now.

You think it's odd that in all of the developed world (far less than the 7 billion in the world as a whole), on a site predominantly American and British, someone knows a person connected to a victim of an attack that killed 22?

Come back when you pass basic high school statistics.

Christ you're naive.

If you really wanted to test your theory you could actually go to Manchester and go to the chip shop owned by the parents of one of the girls who died.

You can highly doubt what you want mate, I'm pretty sure the National Rail don't give a flying fuck about providing folk like you with proof.

I don't believe you helped anyone that was injured by a bomb because I've seen no evidence of an actual explosion. Maybe you assisted someone who was trampled or fell leaving the stadium.

I've actually provided you solid evidence of a crisis actor with a very inconsistent story and now suddenly you're refusing to acknowledge it.

You could say the same thing about the supposed victims of Sandy Hook, which has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have been staged. You have no explicit evidence to suggest that this girl existed or that a couple hundred kids knew she existed.

As for the 18 year old, that's the perfect age to change your name, move, and live on a huge chunk of cash. Hell, I would even find that tempting.

You can believe what you want and have your heart strings pulled, but I have no hard evidence to believe anyone actually died, and neither do you.