The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is the formal governing body for the United States Democratic Party...The DNC is composed of the chairs and vice-chairs of each state Democratic Party committee and over 200 members elected by Democrats in all 50 states and the territories. Its chairperson is elected by the committee...The DNC was established at the 1848 Democratic National Convention...the modern-day Democratic Party was founded around 1828 by Andrew Jackson, making it the world's oldest active party.
"[T]here is no right to — just by virtue of making a donation, to enforce the parties’ internal rules,” said DNC attorney Bruce Spiva. “And there’s no right to not have your candidate disadvantaged or have another candidate advantaged. There’s no contractual obligation here.”
Mr. Spiva is of course referring to the charge that Sanders supporters were defrauded of millions of dollars when they poured donations many of them could barely afford into the campaign of a candidate that the DNC was actively conspiring to sabotage, in gross violation of the Impartiality Clause of their own charter. Rather than trying to deny that this act of sabotage took place, the DNC is instead arguing that it is perfectly within its rights to obstruct and favor any campaign it wants in order to ensure the nomination of the candidate that it prefers
In a Youtube interview (I forgot with who) Jared Beck asked this very important question: If the DNC claim they have no contractual obligation to it's donors, then that assumes donors are not members.
Then what is a DNC member? What is the DNC composed of besides the people with titles and positions?
They can do this, sure, but they should lose their nonprofit status over it if this is their argument. It should still also be considered fraud, since, prior to having candidates accept donations, the DNC claimed to be fair and impartial.
The way I understand it, a great living for the insiders. They focus on TV ad buys, which runs into the many millions, and have no ground game at all. They alternate between well paid gigs on the safest of the party loyalist races and work as highly paid 'media consultants' at various law firms, ad agencies and consulting practices in between. It's a very lucrative revolving door for the chosen few.
Their real goal is to keep the money flowing to the TV networks. They have no ground game (door to door canvassing? What's that?) and they don't support outsiders or progressives at all.
So if your name is Pat Leahy or Chuck Schumer, yeah you love the DNC and use it to reward the party faithful.
If you are a reformer, upstart, or named Sanders, you ain't getting squat from them.
UNITED STATES may legally be a corporation, run by a President, for profit, owned by the Rothschilds/royal family, etc. Title 28 3002 A-C refers to US as a corporation
22 comments
n/a Blunt4words20 2017-05-31
Well you are right D.C. is actually America and every state is a sub corporation.
n/a showmeurboobsplznthx 2017-05-31
Pink floyd Money
https://youtu.be/-0kcet4aPpQ
n/a MarioSpeedwagon13 2017-05-31
Well, duh.
n/a showmeurboobsplznthx 2017-05-31
In all this talk about the election, no one wants to talk how two private organizations caused all this.
n/a Tacofangirl 2017-05-31
This is why Bernie was so popular. And Ron Paul for that matter. The people are thirsty for a viable 3rd party.
n/a TrumpSucksHillsBalls 2017-05-31
A viable third party would be ignored by the Media. Trump is the establishment candidate.
n/a spitdragon2 2017-05-31
Hillary was the establishment candidate.
n/a Throw10101027 2017-05-31
You're both not wrong
n/a spitdragon2 2017-05-31
It doesn't really matter, but Hillary had 90% of news agencies, and celebrities on her side. She even had support from some Republicans.
n/a TrumpSucksHillsBalls 2017-05-31
Kayfabe to make you think you had a choice.
n/a Zetterbluntz 2017-05-31
Two sides of the same coin I'm afraid.
n/a podcastman 2017-05-31
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is the formal governing body for the United States Democratic Party...The DNC is composed of the chairs and vice-chairs of each state Democratic Party committee and over 200 members elected by Democrats in all 50 states and the territories. Its chairperson is elected by the committee...The DNC was established at the 1848 Democratic National Convention...the modern-day Democratic Party was founded around 1828 by Andrew Jackson, making it the world's oldest active party.
n/a showmeurboobsplznthx 2017-05-31
"[T]here is no right to — just by virtue of making a donation, to enforce the parties’ internal rules,” said DNC attorney Bruce Spiva. “And there’s no right to not have your candidate disadvantaged or have another candidate advantaged. There’s no contractual obligation here.”
Mr. Spiva is of course referring to the charge that Sanders supporters were defrauded of millions of dollars when they poured donations many of them could barely afford into the campaign of a candidate that the DNC was actively conspiring to sabotage, in gross violation of the Impartiality Clause of their own charter. Rather than trying to deny that this act of sabotage took place, the DNC is instead arguing that it is perfectly within its rights to obstruct and favor any campaign it wants in order to ensure the nomination of the candidate that it prefers
They don't have to do what they say.
n/a letsgetphysical__ 2017-05-31
In a Youtube interview (I forgot with who) Jared Beck asked this very important question: If the DNC claim they have no contractual obligation to it's donors, then that assumes donors are not members. Then what is a DNC member? What is the DNC composed of besides the people with titles and positions?
n/a spinandflux 2017-05-31
They can do this, sure, but they should lose their nonprofit status over it if this is their argument. It should still also be considered fraud, since, prior to having candidates accept donations, the DNC claimed to be fair and impartial.
n/a TrumpSucksHillsBalls 2017-05-31
Oldest or most obsolete?
n/a podcastman 2017-05-31
The way I understand it, a great living for the insiders. They focus on TV ad buys, which runs into the many millions, and have no ground game at all. They alternate between well paid gigs on the safest of the party loyalist races and work as highly paid 'media consultants' at various law firms, ad agencies and consulting practices in between. It's a very lucrative revolving door for the chosen few.
Their real goal is to keep the money flowing to the TV networks. They have no ground game (door to door canvassing? What's that?) and they don't support outsiders or progressives at all.
So if your name is Pat Leahy or Chuck Schumer, yeah you love the DNC and use it to reward the party faithful.
If you are a reformer, upstart, or named Sanders, you ain't getting squat from them.
n/a batlord_typhus 2017-05-31
Politicians are the clown suits that the money puts on before it fucks you.
n/a Drewcifer419 2017-05-31
Yeah, what the fuck? I'm just finding all of this out. We have literal corporations deciding who we get to vote for. What in the actual fuck?!
n/a favoritecattoy 2017-05-31
Obviously
n/a plato_thyself 2017-05-31
/r/NoCorporations !
n/a FreeDennisReynolds 2017-05-31
UNITED STATES may legally be a corporation, run by a President, for profit, owned by the Rothschilds/royal family, etc. Title 28 3002 A-C refers to US as a corporation