DNA is not a hoax.

Interesting theory. This reminds me of my college anthropology class. I hated it. Sure, it was interesting, but it was all an obvious fairy tale. They find pieces of pottery and rock arrow tips and knives and then extrapolate all kinds of facts about the civilization from those artifacts. Or find 5 weird bones and claim they found one out human ancestors. What a bunch of "hogwash". And if you question the narrative, the professors and TA's get angry because they have literally based their identify off of this profession.

9/11 is a great analogy in this context, I think might be on to something here.

Historians will question all of it eventually. They care mainly for the truth even if it's not comfortable. Look at the causes of ww1, the official narrative was that it was all Germany's fault but that has been seriously questioned

It's this kinda stuff that makes going to school a little difficult at times. Sucks how they structured the education system. A sham from the start. Even suckier that many who do the teaching just do not know. Can't fault them.

Yes. You either swallow what you're told by those smarter and more educated, or you question the "facts". I've always been a questioner. I once got taken out into the hallway and yelled at (what 6th grade me remembers) until I cried for questioning some facts. Didn't stop me though.

Anthropology isnt a science so...

Just because we don't understand something completely doesn't make it a "hoax". Scientists just like to call it junk because their ego and/or funding won't allow them to say "I have no idea what that is."

If there wasn't any genetic information in DNA, then we wouldn't be able to confirm ethnicity with it. But we do...

So how do parental DNA tests work

The annotated watermelon genome contains a total of 62 sugar metabolic enzyme genes and 76 sugar transporter genes, among which 13 sugar metabolic genes and 14 sugar transporter genes were differentially expressed during flesh development and between the flesh and rind tissues

http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v45/n1/full/ng.2470.html

Funny, they didn't use the seeds whatsoever in this. All watermelon flesh and rind..

everything else aside--the "flesh" of fruit and the flesh from an animal are very very different.

Speaking as a microbiologist and somone who studied genetics and evolution in acadamia.

First I have to state that in the sciences (although not readily admitted by the orthodox scientists) there is a large amount of faith and dogma that do tend to enter into the scientific community. Especially when money enters into the equation, there are many "facts" that are in deed contrary to truth. Many instances have occured where mainstream sciences actually acted to stop progress in the field, by failing to admit there is evidence that doesnt fit the current model. When you ignore evidence you become dogmatic.

Whenever using scientific method (trial, error, revise repeat), you cannot know absolute truths, you can however make models that seem to reflect truth accurately. Cellular and molecular bio are no different.

First off to address "junk" DNA. The first scientists to analyze dna used what all humans use to interpret, pattern recognition. Many patterns were picked out and seen over and over again across individuals and even between species and kingdoms. Much of the sequences they studied however didn't appear to follow any particular pattern, and so it was concluded that this was irrelevant or "Junk". When you look at something and you dont understand its usefulness, it appears without purpose, or junk. This is however a simple explanation, and in hindsight it appears that this DNA does serve a more complex purpose.

WHen you isolate DNA from a strawberry, and you run its sequence you get a unique code, which is unique as a snowflake and does not exist anywhere else. If you run DNA from the same strawberry a second and third time, you will find similar DNA sequences, but they will be different. Each of of our cells contain DNA which is related to the other human cells in our bodies. This is why DNA testing is should NOT be used as 100% in criminal cases. Cells are like you and your family and your cousins, there are similarities, but variation. In fact taking into account mutation and cell death (apoptosis) your mean DNA sequence also changes throughout your life.

Anyways there is allot I could talk about. But to address the conspiracy. In order for DNA to be a hoax, you would have to design and control all sequencing software. This software would have to have some bases to connect related "life matter" by degrees, accurately and precisely to other living things based on how closely they resembled one another.

In my opinion the odds of this are nil.

DNA is inherently too unstable. Especially during DNA replication, but even during gene expression and at rest(G1 phase), you can end up with all kinds of mutations. From second to second, many of your cells are spontaneously mutating.

so you failed a biology class and are now looking for excuses?

I don't think I've ever seen a coherent post from this guy. Super ironic username too

also, germs and viruses are a hoax

heh, this guy really hates biology

Someone's mad because their parents are white but he has curly hair and tanned skin

You again... As someone who sequences a lot of DNA and RNA and also performs the "PCR hoax" ( lol), i can assure you that you are batshit crazy.

A basic conspiracy!

Sorry...

http://www.timetounite.com/dna-cell-hoax-made-caduceus-symbols-stars-david/

Maybe the powers that be tried to convince us that we are made of the material so that we see ourselves as nothing but part of the material scenery they prescribe. Instead maybe we are those made of spiritual matter that can ultimately decide and create the reality

we want to live in. Giving us a real chance at freedom of expression, love, compassion, empathy and the ability to live out our own destinies, adventures and lives.

No fate, but what we make.