The change in this sub

21  2017-06-03 by NoLaNaDeR

I've noticed certain topics now require a bibliography and 15 credible sources to not be downvoted....

This is r/conspiracy...since when do we submit to people wanting solid evidence. That's the pint of the sub and it blows my mind.

58 comments

You got any evidence to back up this claim? And who the hell are you? You got any creds?

You can't just come on here and make a claim like

I've noticed certain topics now require a bibliography and 15 credible sources to not be downvoted....

without having some of them FACTS to back it up.

/s

Check /u/TrumpSucksHillsBalls post history for a sample.

Oh, that guy. Shilling for the government on a conspiracy subreddit. smh

Which government?

Just post what interests you. If it gets downvoted, then post it again at a later date for a different audience. No big deal. Things I post often never make it anywhere, and it doesn't really matter. People are going to want to see what appeals to them at a given time, and it's always changing.

Also, there's seems to be a gang mentality around here, as if everybody belongs to a clique and they all laugh at each other jokes and downvote everybody they don't like and they'll gang up on you in the comment section up voting each other. Too much high school drama going on in here.

No. You're just inviting that.

If you support homosexuality based on consent, then you open up the can of worms of that anything involving consent can be allowed, such as a dog consenting to sex with a human.

PS the video I showed you was just a video of a dog dry humping his owner, no sex was involved, although the dog wanted to.

Yeah I was wrong about you defending homosexuality... clearly...

Shills will usually use that as a tactic to test you.

Let's say I make a claim that is true, but it's something so dirty and dark that they don't want people to know about?

EX:

Me: "James Alefantis, whose inappropriate Instagram content, is ranked as the 49th most powerful person in the entire city of Washington DC."

"Shill" source for that claim? I've seen a lot of people larping and attacking this guy for what reason? Any proof of that?

Me: http://www.gq.com/gallery/50-most-powerful-people-in-washington-dc

However, PG and pedogate are the biggest controversies the elite are scrambling to cover up right now.

We can bring these fuckers down with this.

Case and point? ^

You have a big boner for me don't you?

Jealous? Whats going on here? I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong to make you so obsessed with me you weirdo..

I'm not obsessed, I see your patterns on the sub.

*deleted comment from previously linked thread avaliable here

http://archive.is/WX53d

Thanks, actually any more eyes on that post I can get, the better.

Please read this. It shows how TPTB are creating a "divide and conquer" scenario. Most of you already know this stuff, it's peanuts.

Thanks for the visibility, /u/ineffableQuality

Np

Well as long as you keep following and archiving people like me who are a threat to the hills and the establishment, you should be able to amass enough OC to wake up the whole world!....

Interestingly "shills" is your 4th most popular word to use in a post over the past 29 days.

People 162
Trump 126
shit 84
shills 78

Yep, can't stand em. Rot in hell, they all can.

Why are keeping data like that on him/her? Seems kind of ridiculous to be honest.

There are 3rd party tools for such analysis.

Didn't know there were third party tools. Still kind of weird to be logging data of a user like that.

Awkward.

So people asking you for a source is unfair?

That other guy went sherlock holmes on you and found your alt prettt quick lmao

What alt? Can I ask why people are gang banging me right now?

Am I that big of a threat here...

You're not getting "gang banged". I noticed the strange post behavior you and /u/zepheryytyy and the temporal and ideological correlation between your posts.

You react by over reacting and deleting the thread.

I find it interesting because there are several loud voices on the sub, of which your are one, constantly telling us how we are being besiged by shills yet the only hard evidence of this level of comment astroturfing is from a dozen Seth Rich/Kimdotcom/George Webb promoting accounts currently in a sticky on the front page.

I'm just thinking out loud and letting the userbase judge for themselves who proffers truth.

Honestly idc about rule 10, because you should be able to call out shills.

But I'm not a shill dude. And for fucks sake, can you stop following me around? Im trying to wake people up and you are stifling me and assassinating my character and making it very hard to do that.

You're in every thread mate... I'm not following shit.

Yeah this poster always shows up stirring up shit. Knows a lot about shilling but totally isn't one. Wouldn't know how...

Seems like it..

Do you want to do this? this is what i am talking about. you can't let it go because we're right. if you weren't a d bag here people wouldn't care what you talked about.

Reddit is a shill echo chamber - time to move on to other sites if you want to actually discuss anything of importance.

A bunch of plump snowflake pumpkins sitting around telling stories that they want to hear, while bashing anyone with a dissenting opinion. I find that most people here are more zealous than nazi's

ugh. who are you?

The voice of unpolitical correctness

This sub is now turning into r/DebunkingConspiracies with pseudo intellectuals form r/politics

Holy Sh** "r/debunkingsconpiracies" is a real sub lol I just randomly typed that

wow what a coincidence! Odd that your account was created after that thing that never happened...

Hm?

haha such a divisive post! We is not "you" and the point of this sub (and researching curiously unpopular topics) clearly escapes "you".

Using "you" in any context is much more divisive in any situation. "We" used to talk about Bigfoot, chemtrails, Catholic child rape defense, UFOs, NWO shit...etc... without having to write a proper thesis to have a discussion.

Wow, you're gonna define a category and put Catholic child rape in there with bigfoot? If your opinions were real and you and sitting here with me I'd be so convincing.

None those are my opinions but I enjoy reading about them without the constant spam requiring peer reviewed articles to discuss openly

You must be guilty

Guilty of what?

Guilty of whatever the OP is talking about.

What's OP talking about?

^

Incredible claims require incredible proof.

For a conspiracy sub, this place sure does have a weak stomach and filled politically correct hypocrites who flip out on me for speaking my opinion and then they start judging my judging, when they say they don't judge, which means they're intolerant of intolerance, which makes for a conversation that is nonconstructive and filled with name calling.

Leave your political correctness out of conspiracies

That's exactly what I'm trying to say.

You're defending a "person" who recently posted a link and many comments about how having sex with dogs can be consensual and okay.

I don't take the time to read every persons post history on this site. I agreed with the above statement. I don't care if he fucked a cow last week. The internet is serious business apparently but I don't give a fuck about his post history when making a random comment

You should. This person is a troll... Has been banned under it's other account u/amiibohunter87 for harassing people. This person is a fake.

This is r/conspiracy...since when do we submit to people wanting solid evidence.

When "we" want to be taken seriously by people less willing to take alternative information into their worldview

Sourced and detailed posts are the bread and butter of this community, or as least they are to this lone poster

Here's one of my favorite posts that's just a barrage of sources: https://www.np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1cm0t3/_/

This post is being upvoted... wow... very special place in my heart for those that muddy the waters... very special.

Just say it: It's ShareBlue, the evolved pokemon version of CTR.

Since when is it anti-conspiracy to want evidence to dissect or sources to consider? This is insane.

You have a big boner for me don't you?

Jealous? Whats going on here? I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong to make you so obsessed with me you weirdo..

I'm not obsessed, I see your patterns on the sub.

*deleted comment from previously linked thread avaliable here

http://archive.is/WX53d

You're not getting "gang banged". I noticed the strange post behavior you and /u/zepheryytyy and the temporal and ideological correlation between your posts.

You react by over reacting and deleting the thread.

I find it interesting because there are several loud voices on the sub, of which your are one, constantly telling us how we are being besiged by shills yet the only hard evidence of this level of comment astroturfing is from a dozen Seth Rich/Kimdotcom/George Webb promoting accounts currently in a sticky on the front page.

I'm just thinking out loud and letting the userbase judge for themselves who proffers truth.