The change in this sub
21 2017-06-03 by NoLaNaDeR
I've noticed certain topics now require a bibliography and 15 credible sources to not be downvoted....
This is r/conspiracy...since when do we submit to people wanting solid evidence. That's the pint of the sub and it blows my mind.
58 comments
n/a Armaedus 2017-06-03
You got any evidence to back up this claim? And who the hell are you? You got any creds?
You can't just come on here and make a claim like
without having some of them FACTS to back it up.
/s
n/a DeepStateOfMind 2017-06-03
Check /u/TrumpSucksHillsBalls post history for a sample.
n/a Spartan1117 2017-06-03
Oh, that guy. Shilling for the government on a conspiracy subreddit. smh
n/a DeepStateOfMind 2017-06-03
Which government?
n/a Apoplecticmiscreant 2017-06-03
Just post what interests you. If it gets downvoted, then post it again at a later date for a different audience. No big deal. Things I post often never make it anywhere, and it doesn't really matter. People are going to want to see what appeals to them at a given time, and it's always changing.
n/a one_two_combo 2017-06-03
Also, there's seems to be a gang mentality around here, as if everybody belongs to a clique and they all laugh at each other jokes and downvote everybody they don't like and they'll gang up on you in the comment section up voting each other. Too much high school drama going on in here.
n/a four_leaf_tayback 2017-06-03
No. You're just inviting that.
n/a one_two_combo 2017-06-03
If you support homosexuality based on consent, then you open up the can of worms of that anything involving consent can be allowed, such as a dog consenting to sex with a human.
PS the video I showed you was just a video of a dog dry humping his owner, no sex was involved, although the dog wanted to.
n/a four_leaf_tayback 2017-06-03
Yeah I was wrong about you defending homosexuality... clearly...
n/a margaritavilllll 2017-06-03
Shills will usually use that as a tactic to test you.
Let's say I make a claim that is true, but it's something so dirty and dark that they don't want people to know about?
EX:
Me: "James Alefantis, whose inappropriate Instagram content, is ranked as the 49th most powerful person in the entire city of Washington DC."
"Shill" source for that claim? I've seen a lot of people larping and attacking this guy for what reason? Any proof of that?
Me: http://www.gq.com/gallery/50-most-powerful-people-in-washington-dc
However, PG and pedogate are the biggest controversies the elite are scrambling to cover up right now.
We can bring these fuckers down with this.
n/a IneffableQuality 2017-06-03
22 minutes
https://imgur.com/jl0vhls.png
n/a margaritavilllll 2017-06-03
Case and point? ^
n/a IneffableQuality 2017-06-03
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6elowc/z/dib8dqc
n/a margaritavilllll 2017-06-03
You have a big boner for me don't you?
Jealous? Whats going on here? I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong to make you so obsessed with me you weirdo..
n/a IneffableQuality 2017-06-03
I'm not obsessed, I see your patterns on the sub.
*deleted comment from previously linked thread avaliable here
http://archive.is/WX53d
n/a margaritavilllll 2017-06-03
Thanks, actually any more eyes on that post I can get, the better.
Please read this. It shows how TPTB are creating a "divide and conquer" scenario. Most of you already know this stuff, it's peanuts.
Thanks for the visibility, /u/ineffableQuality
n/a IneffableQuality 2017-06-03
Np
n/a margaritavilllll 2017-06-03
Well as long as you keep following and archiving people like me who are a threat to the hills and the establishment, you should be able to amass enough OC to wake up the whole world!....
n/a IneffableQuality 2017-06-03
Interestingly "shills" is your 4th most popular word to use in a post over the past 29 days.
People 162
Trump 126
shit 84
shills 78
n/a margaritavilllll 2017-06-03
Yep, can't stand em. Rot in hell, they all can.
n/a VisionaryPrism 2017-06-03
Why are keeping data like that on him/her? Seems kind of ridiculous to be honest.
n/a IneffableQuality 2017-06-03
There are 3rd party tools for such analysis.
n/a VisionaryPrism 2017-06-03
Didn't know there were third party tools. Still kind of weird to be logging data of a user like that.
n/a g3374r2d2 2017-06-03
Awkward.
n/a mesqueunclubsandwich 2017-06-03
So people asking you for a source is unfair?
That other guy went sherlock holmes on you and found your alt prettt quick lmao
n/a margaritavilllll 2017-06-03
What alt? Can I ask why people are gang banging me right now?
Am I that big of a threat here...
n/a IneffableQuality 2017-06-03
You're not getting "gang banged". I noticed the strange post behavior you and /u/zepheryytyy and the temporal and ideological correlation between your posts.
You react by over reacting and deleting the thread.
I find it interesting because there are several loud voices on the sub, of which your are one, constantly telling us how we are being besiged by shills yet the only hard evidence of this level of comment astroturfing is from a dozen Seth Rich/Kimdotcom/George Webb promoting accounts currently in a sticky on the front page.
I'm just thinking out loud and letting the userbase judge for themselves who proffers truth.
n/a margaritavilllll 2017-06-03
Honestly idc about rule 10, because you should be able to call out shills.
But I'm not a shill dude. And for fucks sake, can you stop following me around? Im trying to wake people up and you are stifling me and assassinating my character and making it very hard to do that.
n/a IneffableQuality 2017-06-03
You're in every thread mate... I'm not following shit.
n/a Iamamansass 2017-06-03
Yeah this poster always shows up stirring up shit. Knows a lot about shilling but totally isn't one. Wouldn't know how...
n/a margaritavilllll 2017-06-03
Seems like it..
n/a Iamamansass 2017-06-03
Do you want to do this? this is what i am talking about. you can't let it go because we're right. if you weren't a d bag here people wouldn't care what you talked about.
n/a Fooomanchu 2017-06-03
Reddit is a shill echo chamber - time to move on to other sites if you want to actually discuss anything of importance.
n/a one_two_combo 2017-06-03
A bunch of plump snowflake pumpkins sitting around telling stories that they want to hear, while bashing anyone with a dissenting opinion. I find that most people here are more zealous than nazi's
n/a four_leaf_tayback 2017-06-03
ugh. who are you?
n/a one_two_combo 2017-06-03
The voice of unpolitical correctness
n/a Jadehelm522 2017-06-03
This sub is now turning into r/DebunkingConspiracies with pseudo intellectuals form r/politics
n/a Jadehelm522 2017-06-03
Holy Sh** "r/debunkingsconpiracies" is a real sub lol I just randomly typed that
n/a four_leaf_tayback 2017-06-03
wow what a coincidence! Odd that your account was created after that thing that never happened...
n/a Jadehelm522 2017-06-03
Hm?
n/a four_leaf_tayback 2017-06-03
haha such a divisive post! We is not "you" and the point of this sub (and researching curiously unpopular topics) clearly escapes "you".
n/a NoLaNaDeR 2017-06-03
Using "you" in any context is much more divisive in any situation. "We" used to talk about Bigfoot, chemtrails, Catholic child rape defense, UFOs, NWO shit...etc... without having to write a proper thesis to have a discussion.
n/a four_leaf_tayback 2017-06-03
Wow, you're gonna define a category and put Catholic child rape in there with bigfoot? If your opinions were real and you and sitting here with me I'd be so convincing.
n/a NoLaNaDeR 2017-06-03
None those are my opinions but I enjoy reading about them without the constant spam requiring peer reviewed articles to discuss openly
n/a one_two_combo 2017-06-03
You must be guilty
n/a four_leaf_tayback 2017-06-03
Guilty of what?
n/a one_two_combo 2017-06-03
Guilty of whatever the OP is talking about.
n/a four_leaf_tayback 2017-06-03
What's OP talking about?
n/a NoLaNaDeR 2017-06-03
^
n/a Gaslightin 2017-06-03
Incredible claims require incredible proof.
n/a one_two_combo 2017-06-03
For a conspiracy sub, this place sure does have a weak stomach and filled politically correct hypocrites who flip out on me for speaking my opinion and then they start judging my judging, when they say they don't judge, which means they're intolerant of intolerance, which makes for a conversation that is nonconstructive and filled with name calling.
Leave your political correctness out of conspiracies
n/a NoLaNaDeR 2017-06-03
That's exactly what I'm trying to say.
n/a four_leaf_tayback 2017-06-03
You're defending a "person" who recently posted a link and many comments about how having sex with dogs can be consensual and okay.
n/a NoLaNaDeR 2017-06-03
I don't take the time to read every persons post history on this site. I agreed with the above statement. I don't care if he fucked a cow last week. The internet is serious business apparently but I don't give a fuck about his post history when making a random comment
n/a Iamamansass 2017-06-03
You should. This person is a troll... Has been banned under it's other account u/amiibohunter87 for harassing people. This person is a fake.
n/a TrollsRLifeless 2017-06-03
When "we" want to be taken seriously by people less willing to take alternative information into their worldview
Sourced and detailed posts are the bread and butter of this community, or as least they are to this lone poster
Here's one of my favorite posts that's just a barrage of sources: https://www.np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1cm0t3/_/
n/a four_leaf_tayback 2017-06-03
This post is being upvoted... wow... very special place in my heart for those that muddy the waters... very special.
n/a letsgetphysical__ 2017-06-03
Just say it: It's ShareBlue, the evolved pokemon version of CTR.
n/a marieknocks 2017-06-03
Since when is it anti-conspiracy to want evidence to dissect or sources to consider? This is insane.
n/a margaritavilllll 2017-06-03
You have a big boner for me don't you?
Jealous? Whats going on here? I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong to make you so obsessed with me you weirdo..
n/a IneffableQuality 2017-06-03
I'm not obsessed, I see your patterns on the sub.
*deleted comment from previously linked thread avaliable here
http://archive.is/WX53d
n/a IneffableQuality 2017-06-03
You're not getting "gang banged". I noticed the strange post behavior you and /u/zepheryytyy and the temporal and ideological correlation between your posts.
You react by over reacting and deleting the thread.
I find it interesting because there are several loud voices on the sub, of which your are one, constantly telling us how we are being besiged by shills yet the only hard evidence of this level of comment astroturfing is from a dozen Seth Rich/Kimdotcom/George Webb promoting accounts currently in a sticky on the front page.
I'm just thinking out loud and letting the userbase judge for themselves who proffers truth.