r/conspiracy: Tesla: If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.

Tesla: If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.

447 2017-06-05 by LightBringerFlex

Nikola Tesla meant:

Simply consider this: Life everywhere is composed of far more space than matter. (This is easily observable with either a microscope or a telescope. Not surprisingly, the universe and a grain of sand look exactly the same, depending upon the degree of the sand’s magnification. The macrocosm and the microcosm are essentially identical.) Now when pure energy—the primal expression of Life that we will call the Essential Essence—coagulates, it transforms into what would be called, in human terms, “matter.” Because these coagulations are vibrating or vacillating at a sufficient speed, the particles constantly move. They not only vibrate or rotate in place, they also move through space, propelled by the energy of their spin—not unlike a top moving across a table as it spins. These countless particles can move so fast (in relative terms) that they appear to be neither here nor there, but everywhere at once, thus creating the illusion of solidity—or what you would call, that which is “physical.”

You can watch the blades of a fan or the spokes of a bicycle wheel producing exactly this same illusion. The illusion of solidity.

Now, should the space between the spokes of a bicycle wheel be sufficiently enormous (as it would feel to you if you were the size of a microbe and your perspective was therefore myopic), all you would see for a very long time—until the next spoke of the wheel came by—is empty space. In effect, while you are waiting and watching for the next spoke, the solidity will appear to have disappeared. What you do not know is that it was never there to begin with. It was merely the speed of the spokes moving past your line of sight that created the illusion of solidity.

The formula is simple: Time + Space = Appearance.

100 comments

n/a nwostumper 2017-06-05

Vibrations from an osicalater can bring down a bridge or building in minutes. 😉

n/a medic30420 2017-06-05

http://www.excludedmiddle.com/earthquake.htm for those that missed the reference.

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

The oscillator/"earthquake machine" was explored in 2006 in Episode 60 – "Earthquake Machine". The MythBusters made a device powered by electricity rather than steam. It produced vibrations that could be felt hundreds of feet away, but no earthquake shaking on the modern bridge they attached to; they judged that the claim that the device produced an earthquake to be false (i.e. a "busted myth").

n/a LancerFIN 2017-06-05

Mythbusters would totally show on TV how to destroy bridges. You have to understand that they can't show everything on TV. Like how to cheat speeding cameras.

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

They tested the myth and showed that it doesn't work.

It's not a conspiracy.

n/a WeAreRobot 2017-06-05

Trusts Television. Lol

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

I trust mythbusters more than I trust random commenters on /r/conspiracy who claim that "osicalaters" [sic] can collapse bridges, you are correct. I don't see what's so funny about this, though.

n/a notacrackheadofficer 2017-06-05

These people are actual scientists. I bet it's all over the head of you, all the other fanboys of the moronic show, and the show's stars.
University of California, Department of Engineering.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/608808.pdf
They spent more effort on that paper than 100 years worth of mythbusters .
''At a very specific pitch, infrasound explodes matter. At others, infrasound incapacitates and kills. Organisms rupture in its blast. Sea creatures use this power to stun and kill prey.'' https://borderlandsciences.org/journal/vol/52/n04/Vassilatos_on_Vladimir_Gavreau.html
....''These experiments with infrasonics were as dangerous as those early investigations of nuclear energy. Dr. Gavreau and his associates were dangerously ill for nearly a day after these preliminary tests. These maladies were sustained for hours after the device was [32] turned off. Infrasonic assaults on the body are the more lethal because they come with dreadful silence. The eyesight of Dr. Gavreau and his fellow workers were affected for days. More dangerously were their internal organs affected: the heart, lungs, stomach, intestinal cavity were filled with continual painful spasms for an equal time period.''
And mythbusters pretended to ''debunk'' the whole range of studies, with improper equipment, and very little knowledge.
The show is boiled down for the 4th grade level of education.

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

I don't see how this is relevant to the ability of oscillators to collapse bridges.

n/a notacrackheadofficer 2017-06-05

Well, I'm sorry for you then, I guess?

n/a CantankerousMind 2017-06-05

They also tested drug dogs and totally avoided tests that would trick the dogs(like hiding drugs in high places or sprinkling drugs all over the area so the dog would get confused).

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

Well is there any proof that oscillators can bring down buildings?

n/a CantankerousMind 2017-06-05

I never said there was. Only stating that myth busters should not be cited as proof either way.

If it was possible to take a bridge down using an oscillator, myth busters would not be allowed to attempt it.

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

Why not?

n/a CantankerousMind 2017-06-05

Myth busters is not the authority on reality. Look at my drug dog example. If Myth busters is the authority on reality then drug dogs are always effective. This is contrary to reality.

Their show is entertaining, but by no means are all of their experiments fullproof.

Once again I feel the need to clarify my argument. I'm not saying that the oscillation thing works or that the myth busters are wrong about it, just that myth busters testing something and coming to a conclusion doesn't mean they are actually correct. They don't test certain conditions and can't test all conditions. This becomes important when the conditions in the test could influence the outcome of the test.

And unless their experiments are verified by the scientific community, people shouldn't be pointing to them as fact. It's just as bad to assume that the oscillation thing works, as it is to assume that it doesn't work, just because the myth busters tried an experiment.

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

Yeah, but the problem in your logic is in this situation it's an anonymous comment on /r/conspiracy against mythbusters.

No matter how many people get mad at me for pointing this out, there is 0 credibility behind the statement that oscillators can destroy bridges. Even if mythbusters are shit science, they still have more credibility than random comments on reddit. This is a fact.

And no, pointing out that mythbusters weren't 100% correct all the time won't change the fact that it is still just a comment on reddit against their test. An actual test.

n/a CantankerousMind 2017-06-05

If it's just a comment on Reddit why do you even care? If there is no credibility then it doesn't even warrant a response.

n/a BazsiBazsi 2017-06-05

They did the glass shattering thing and it worked, it could also work a steel tube

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

Even if you're correct, and that's a pretty big if, bridge is not a steel tube

n/a Drooperdoo 2017-06-05

LancerFIN is right. Using "Mythbusters" as your "scientific source" is problematic because 1) They're not scientists; they're Hollywood prop makers. Not only are they not scientists; they're not even engineers. Both engineers and scientists have busted them numerous times for goofing in their methodology and drawing flawed conclusions. And 2) The "Mystbusters" have been censored and suppressed. Such as when they tried to have a segment on RFID technology and the credit card companies shut them down.

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

I agree with your first point, but second point is irrelevant considering that they were not censored from doing the oscillator tests.

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

Deleted my previous comment because I saw that you edited yours.

Anyways, I know that MythBusters are not very scientific yet

Oscillators are not complex technology and are not the same as quantum physics
I notice you have nothing to say about their credibility on the oscillator test, which just makes me feel like it's just an ad hominem

You do realize the massive skills gap between someone of Tesla's magnitude and . . . Joe the Plumber, right?

Yes there is a massive skill gap between a scientist from 1900 and modern understanding of science.

n/a Drooperdoo 2017-06-05

Excellent! Tesla is fuddy-duddy old 19th Century backwardness and the "Mythbusters" represent a "modern understanding of science"?

Awesome!

Tell me the date they release their wonderful slew of new society-changing inventions . . . like Tesla's invention of alternating current, remote control and radio.

I'm sure with their "modern understanding of science," the Hollywood prop makers will show that illiterate 19th Century barbarian for the bumpkin he was.

It must be so awesome to live in a world where basic cable TV hosts are the intellectual superior of 19th Century hacks. Maybe Bill Nye should be used to contradict Einstein? Or Nickelodeon's "Mr. Wizard" to knock down that bumbling Maxwell, with his crazy rantings about electromagnetic waves.

As we all know: TV hosts with their "modern understanding of science" just leave those 19th Century idiots in the dust.

Screw using Adam and Jamie to debunk that 19th Century goon, Max Planck, with his crazy "Quantum Mechanics" blithering, I want them to set their sites on a real caveman: Leonard Da Vinci. With their "modern minds," they'll be sure to show their IQ disparity with that moron.

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

Tesla represents fuddy-duddy old 19th Century backwardness and the "Mythbusters" represent a "modern understanding of science"?

I didn't say that, though.

Besides, I find it funny that a guy who equates oscillators to quantum physics is so offended by me saying that 19th century scientists didn't know as much as we know today.

n/a BorisKafka 2017-06-05

Any man who grew up near a farm with an electric fence knows damn well that electricity travels up a stream of piss. You only need to learn this lesson ONCE!

n/a expletivdeleted 2017-06-05

or watch their dog learn it.

n/a noch0ice 2017-06-05

mythbusters LMAO

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

Random commenters on /r/conspiracy LMAO

n/a noch0ice 2017-06-05

im not the one thinking mythbusters is anything else but complete propaghanda.. keep sippin the koolaid BRUH

n/a faultydesign 2017-06-05

You're the one who believes a random commenter on /r/conspiracy, yes.

Also learn English please.

n/a notacrackheadofficer 2017-06-05

Hofstadter broke this down in a tale of a record player destroyed by a record played on it, with the proper record player destroying vibrations, in Godel Escher Bach.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/24113.G_del_Escher_Bach

n/a aevans395 2017-06-05

With the magnetic pole reversal humans will soon ascend to 5D with heightened frequencies more in tune with the planet.

n/a krazeesheet 2017-06-05

Except for those too attached to this material existance. They will be so confused and grasping for this life they will end up in 4d, lost.

n/a mr_spree 2017-06-05