I think so. I do not believe in extra-terrestrials (per se - lol, little green men in space suits), I do believe in terrestrial inter-dimensional beings, though.

So you don't believe that another species in our huge galaxy could advance enough for interplanetary space travel? We already have the technical capabilities for interplanetary space travel so it would be pretty naive to think that we are the only intelligent life that can. Aliens exist and there are multiple species including the little green guys.

We've never been to the moon, nor have we been to Mars. Agartha on the other hand... maybe?

We've never been to the moon

Uneducated disinfo drivel.

Evidence we have been?

Evidence we have been?

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v4/n2/full/ngeo1050.html

http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2008/05/20080520_kaguya_e.html

for starters ...

Not evidence. Nice pictures though...

Not evidence. Nice pictures though...

How did you read the entire scientific study linked in the first link in 1 minute? What do you disagree with regarding it's findings?

How do you explain the identical features in the JAXA satellite images with the Apollo images?

Instead of dismissing things for no legitimate reason, why not actually explain your point of view within the context of the information provided???

I'm a fast reader, and CGI... Next?

I'm a fast reader, and CGI... Next?

Then what evidence do you have to dispute the δD(‰) versus H2O (wt.%) of lunar apatite findings?

Can you please link it here since you disagree?

We've never been to the moon or mars?

We've never been to the moon or mars?

That isn't evidence, I'm asking for your evidence to the contrary. This is an unbelievably simple question ... why are you dodging?

I asked for your evidence....

I asked for your evidence....

and I provided it ... you've yet to provide anything.

There are hundreds of studies regarding the samples collected from various Lunar missions. Not sure how you have avoided all of these:

http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/moon_meteorites.htm

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/CosmoSparks/July12/Lunar-rock-densities.html

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/missions/apollo/apollo_16/samples/

So again, where is your evidence?

You have not provided evidence.. I'm still waiting...

I just did above, the three links in blue ...

That's not evidence. I'm still waiting 😂

Yes it is, there's links to scientific journals contained in them as well.

What would you consider evidence if you don't believe scientific studies and verification by third parties to be evidence?

Still waiting 😂

It's been provided, I guess you're drunk. I'll try again when you're sober.

Not drunk, you just have not provided evidence. Still waiting 😂

I did, not sure how you missed it, the only excuse is that you are again loaded. Again, what about this isn't "evidence"?

http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/moon_meteorites.htm

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/CosmoSparks/July12/Lunar-rock-densities.html

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/missions/apollo/apollo_16/samples/

Here is the definition of evidence for you, since you seem confused and or in a drunken stupor:

• evidence: the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

I've presented quite a few sources from the available body of facts, you have done nothing.

Take a break from the bottle man, you're losing it, it's tragic to watch.

Not evidence, and your childish attacks will not working. I shall await 😂

They meet the standard definition of evidence, as provided and verified by the literal definition of evidence.

Again, what is your standard of evidence that you require?

Still waiting for evidence 😂

I did man ... you've provided nothing. This has been a terrifying conversation. Please seek help immediately.

Good-bye for now, I'll try again when you sober up.

Still waiting for evidence 😂.

Good-bye dude, and good luck. You're literally blind drunk right now, I fear for you and the people that care about you.

I'm not, but your childish tactics are evident.... Let me know when you get some evidence. Also, tell I told /u/thrownuptown: hi 😂

I provided evidence man, I guess you missed it. Are multiple using your account?

There are only two reasonable explanations for you missing the evidence I provided. Either you're completely blitzed, or there are multiple people using your handle and the other person missed my posts.

So which is it?

😂

Again, here's a recap for you, try to keep up, it's honestly very very simple stuff outlined in a way that any sober person with a basic understanding of the scientific method should be able to understand:

• the definition of evidence: the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

Have you followed so far? If not, outline which part of that you don't understand so I can try and simplify it for you further.

Then look at these links:

http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/moon_meteorites.htm

http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/CosmoSparks/July12/Lunar-rock-densities.html

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/missions/apollo/apollo_16/samples/

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v4/n2/full/ngeo1050.html

http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2008/05/20080520_kaguya_e.html

Now go back to the definition of evidence, here it is again in case you forgot (this time in bold):

• the definition of evidence: the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

I hope I didn't lose you, fortunately I've had experience teaching children before, so I know how to outline information in a manner that even they can understand. I hope I've managed to do the same for you, if not, please let me know where you got lost along the way.

Still no evidence, also why so concerned if I'm drinking (I'm not). Did you tell /u/thrownuptown I said hi? Maybe Shalom is more formal... Not sure... 😂

The post is filled with evidence, how did you get lost? Seriously? Just say what you don't understand, why is this so difficult for you?

Dodge/distract, a tactic as old as propaganda itself.

Why would I creep on some other user for you? If you want to ask them on a date do it yourself weirdo ...

😂

I'm not gonna sleaze on some user for your weird fetishes man ... why not address the topic at hand instead of drunkenly asking people to creep on other users?

okay, /u/thrownuptown 😂

So not going to discuss the topic ... got it.

Red herring logical fallacy ... at least you've made it clear that you have no argument.

Don't waste your time man. He couldn't even give your sources a read aside to call the pictures in them cgi, he's not worth the words.

I've seen L. Fletcher Prouty state that all alien stuff is 100% disinfo.

(he was on JFK's Joint Chiefs of Staff)

I definitely think so, but I still think there are aliens out there. Corbett has a really cool podcast about the alien psyop if you're interested

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-301-how-to-fake-an-alien-invasion/

Yep, it's actually a something stated by Kissinger in order to usher in a One World Government by creating an 'enemy of mankind', much like the current national level system of "war on terror/drugs".

I don't want to get into too many details, since I think the whole coverup exists for good reasons. But it's not a psyop.

Interesting theory, tell me more about why you think a cover up is actually good?

Yes, it's pushed through the mainstream media, alternative media (Reddit), all kinds of media, etc. Outer space aliens aren't real but they're set up for the biggest false flag

i really want to see the tech to cover the whole sky with a freaking hologram

i'd sooner believe they have ET and his technology for decades than this crap

Not evidence. Nice pictures though...

How did you read the entire scientific study linked in the first link in 1 minute? What do you disagree with regarding it's findings?

How do you explain the identical features in the JAXA satellite images with the Apollo images?

Instead of dismissing things for no legitimate reason, why not actually explain your point of view within the context of the information provided???

Still waiting 😂

They meet the standard definition of evidence, as provided and verified by the literal definition of evidence.

Again, what is your standard of evidence that you require?