about voting machines and hacking

3  2017-06-10 by 34mississippi

Soros owns several companies that make a shit pile of voting machines in the U.S. and more signifigantly lately Europe especially france. Voting machines are as complex as casino machines and the lottery machines at every gas station you have ever been to. They dont need to save money they sell on unhackability. You can't hack an atm a voting machine or a casino machine without having the O.S. already and then plugging right into the bastard.

Period ever. Never ever. Not even the really crappy ones. Not even the prototypes.

Nobody buys any of these three items and then hooks them up to a wireless anything they do not come with the capability to begin with and never will because it is a FAULTY concept for them to have connectivity. COnnectivity is exactly what the manufacturers seek to avoid with these items not only for security but also to ensure that once you buy the bastard you always have to contact them for any repair , just a like a car so fucked to work on you need to take it to the dealer for an oil change because you have to take off the front right tire to get at the oil filter or spend 3 hours removing the bumper on your cadillac to change the HID headlight.

caveat-lottery machines are connected to a network that only serves the lottery office in the state they are placed in on dedicated lines to the headquarters and then the headquarters have dedicated lines to eachother and the central office they are all carried by time warner cable/L3 on dedicated fiber optic runs (office and headquarters lines) . data ONLY GOES OUT the lottery machines (at gas stations) to the headquarters it cannot come in the machines do not accept information. cannot hack. ever. There was rumor of an inside job occuring in the state of minnesota a few years back involving small payouts of around 100,000 to a million dollars being arranged by lottery employees a few years back, but the man in question slit his own wrists while drunk and walked out into the woods like 4 miles from his houses in the frigid minnesota winter and froze to death cept the amount of blood lost defied how far he was able to walk in his state and the temperature. There can be cheating at the lottery but it would have to be done with someone with access to a main office. You couldnt do anything from your typical powerball machine at holiday or flying j's or circle k.

hacking voting machines =FAKE

46 comments

Dude you don't need to hack the voting machine. You just swap the memory card that holds the votes. Plus there's no paper audit trail. End of story.

Do some research on the Diebold machines put in after the 2000 elections.

hence noone hacked them did they that would be know as election fraud wouldnt it, who has a controlling interest in diebold? George Soros. So yeah that is my point you cant hack them and unless russians were there they couldnt affect the election and they dont have memory cards they arent cameras. they have internal storage like your hard drive

They have memory cards...

http://citp.princeton.edu/research/voting/

How much have you looked into the security of voting machines? I'll top level comment with more sources in about an hour.

Do you remember back in 2004 when the Ohio governor guaranteed victory for Bush? I hate Soros as much as the next guy but this is bigger than him.

i agree i am simply trying to rid people of the lie that the vote was "hacked" and pointing out if we want to open that box of conspiracies that we need to look at all the angles and not just the ones that fit our political biases, soros owns alot of voting machines all over the world. He has a huge network of political activists and lobbyists. He has much influence everywhere. Is he the head of the snake probably not. Is he a major player who shouldnt be overlooked absolutely.

Ah ok so if I'm understanding correctly, you're saying the Russian hacking angle is bullshit and it's more about following the money and power trail, hence it leads back to the evil like Soros. Therefore the hacking claim is merely a distraction. Is that kind of what you're saying?

oh my god yes finally someone is listening I would fucking hug you if i could

Ok I can get aboard this lol

Have you read about the state of Georgia AG saying there was a hack attempt from D.C.?

yes an illegal attempt if it were true. I think there was also one other state involved. This all happened if I remeber correctly after Trump made the joke about Russia finding Hillary's emails for us and giving them to the FBI. I think the entire story was false and placed to build a covert foundation in peoples minds to lead them towards the concept of a hack being possible and happening. Like baby steps towards the gaslighting you are trying to push on the public.

also that lottery dude was really murdered and he was rigging the powerball in minnesota beacuse he had access to the drawn numbers and could still print a ticket in the 2 minutes between drawing and pay machine shut down. They pre record the ball drops then release them at drawing time to ensure there are no hiccups with the fancy pneumatic bingo ball blower machines they use for the on air draw.

No Soros does not own a company that makes voting machines.

Here's the problem: Soros does not own the company in question. Also, the Smartmatic voting machines are not even going to be used in this year's election.

Your post is based on misinformation and factless political attacks.

actually your knowlege is based on lies from the MSM cool though I am not here to change your mind on that I simply explained how they couldnt be hacked and I stated the fact that he owns a controlling interest in the stock shares of the company I did not state he owns it. Work on your reading comprehension breh

He does own any of it. Someone who is in an organization he donates to owns it. The Business Insider story is short.

Sorry. No I will not censor my views for your benefit and the furtherance of your viewpoint. We can discuss it in a civil manner and maybe come to an agreement or we can cease to communicate like adults. I dont do ultimatums.

You can tamper with a voting machine. You cannot hack it. Words are very important here. Especially as relates to this issue. There is a huge conspiracy at work here. Has been for years. There is an elite ruling class in america that has enjoyed a comfortable status quo for years misleading and fooling Americans. They are terrified and losing power right now since the election of Donald Trump. We are witnessing the Death Rattle of the establishment/TPTB right now.

We need to tread carefully mentally to avoid becoming sucked back into the vortex they keep us in to keep us under their thumbs.

Someone who is in an organization he donates to owns it. That is some hair splitting I am a lawyer defending the mob kind of logic. Really? Come on. He soley funds hundreds of agenda driven organizations and shell companies to push his agenda for the world. Just like bloomberg and his numerous anti gun groups. If I pay a junkie to break into your house and take your stuff at the end of the day I am still guilty of conspiracy. It would just make me slightly smarter than the average criminal by adding a few degrees of seperation between myself and the deeds I am paying someone else to do. Even you must realize at the core that arguement does not hold water. You may never be able to admit it but the logical part of your brain tells you it must be true.

So you were wrong about Soros and voting machines so I am to get nanny lecture.

Seems to be a common trend with this user, at least in my own experience.

Poor fact checking skills and angry defense.

Definitely, this is actually a repost from one of the comments they made in our argument. Pretty sure they blocked me for proving them wrong lol

How quickly intelligent conversation devolves into boo hoo I dont wanna play and I am taking my toys and going home. I know that soros owns the controlling shares in not only the company that was called die bold but also several other companies that make voting machines. I don't care what information you have gleamed from bloomberg owned buisiness insider or snopes or what ever other online rag you take at face value.

I simply called you out on your statement in a respectful manner. I am sorry you are unable to do so yourself (have a respectful converstation that is) . You were probably one of those kids who throws the controller at the screen and cries when mario got bit by a gumba too.

No where did i state that I disagree with my initial post. I simply asked you to look at your logic and see that it is completely flawed.

No you don't know that because it isn't true and that Is why I don't want to consider what else you might have to say.

Confirmation bias is strong and hard to break through much like deeply ingrained racism and homophobia. I am sorry I cannot help you. You are mentally in the same boat with real racists and people who adamantly hate gays. Have a nice evening.

When did fact checking become confirmation bias?

fact checking is a trendy term for damage control and spin these days ever notice that the only facts getting checked lately are ones that don'f fit the progressive agenda.

I thought you were done listening to me but you keep coming back for more. I have a job and am retiring for the evening. I need to go out and locate underground utilities so our contractors and construction companies can keep moving ahead at making america great again through fixing our roads and infrastructure and help people know where it is safe to dig in their yards.

Is your job meaningful and does it contribute to society or are you paid to post on reddit?

fact checking is a trendy term for damage control and spin these days ever notice that the only facts getting checked lately are ones that don'f fit the progressive agenda.

You're the one doing damage control, trying to downplay the recently leaked report by Reality Winner.

Is your job meaningful and does it contribute to society or are you paid to post on reddit?

Why do you make so many shill accusations when you're wrong?

Well there is the problem, I am liberal, not progressive.

That is nice. Libertarians are Actually Liberal. Liberals are not. Green apple red apple still an apple.

Libertarians are the ultimate reactionaries and the oldest harshest form of conservatism the feudalism of pre-Magna Carta Europe.

Their idea of liberalism is to remove any protections and laws by a government that protect anything but their own rights to profit from any act including enslavement of other humans.

What you are offering is 18th century vision of liberal for justification for laissez faire capitalism, but it is not the modern U.S. understanding of that word means, though at the core of the definition,

"move away from central control," the word can be used for widely different outcomes.

Libertarian liberalism is removing government controls on production, trade, labor, and of limiting taxes only for military and police costs, said taxes to be paid by the lower classes only.

U.S. liberalism is clearly centered in removing laws that limit individuals right to live protected by those first ten amendments called the Bill of Rights or the list of guaranteed individual rights.

Libertarians claim no government can list or guarantee any individual rights.

So why would you choose to be one who refuses your own individual rights?

Green apple Red apple. Both apples. Both wrong both mislead. Both brainwashed. Both spouting communist talking points. Both like to put things into very narrow categories and divide then use the divide to control. Both lie to win at any cost. Both evil. I don't like your apples.

They are bad apples.

Why don't any of you, both sides are the same propagandists,

define the one side only government you seek?

Because this idea both sides are the same is clearly nutty.

What are idea are you hiding?

The most famous example that there are two different sides is of course the Revolution of 1776, the American Colonies against the King of England.

I am hiding the good apples but you wont find them where you are currently residing mentally.

So good you can't tell. Sounds like bull shit to me.

you are no longer making sense. This isn't a thing you can debate your way out of. Green apples and red apples are the same. Even Hitler said as much when he started the red apple movement. He said the only difference between red apples and green apples was the focus on racial purity.

Libertarians hold actual liberal viewpoints. SO called liberals are facists and Progressives are socialists , on a progressive journey towards communism. You used a bunch of Karl the tard Marx words in your response that is when I stopped listening.

I think that is the ultimate idea salad of confusion.

apple salad and also only your salad

Call back when you can explain what that means.

can i use my banana phone or would you prefer the football one i got from ESPN when I was 12?

I don't care, I never answer mine anyway.

Well that is just rude why would you ignore all those people who took the time out of their busy days to call and talk to you?

The people I care about know I will call them now and then and that I don't mind if they don't answer all the time.

you my friend may in fact be a rotten apple and your words of choice are stripped straight from not only marx's writing but also mein kompf apple apple apple

But hey you say both sides are the same.

apple apple apple only hitler saw a difference apple apple

How often to you look up your Hitler quotes?

it is important to know you past lest you begin to repeat it like todays "liberals" in America are doing .... by exhibiting the exact behaviors of Hitler's brown shirts in the 1930s maybe I am a history major. Maybe you are running out of ideas so you are inferring I must study Hitler. Apples Apples APPLES!!!!

I'm not the one repeating myself.

.......Apples.....

Soros owns several companies that make a shit pile of voting machines in the U.S. and more signifigantly lately Europe especially france.

No he doesn't, please source.

Voting machines are as complex as casino machines and the lottery machines at every gas station you have ever been to. They dont need to save money they sell on unhackability. You can't hack an atm a voting machine or a casino machine without having the O.S. already and then plugging right into the bastard. Period ever. Never ever. Not even the really crappy ones. Not even the prototypes.

http://citp.princeton.edu/research/voting/

Unhackability lol

Nobody buys any of these three items and then hooks them up to a wireless anything they do not come with the capability to begin with and never will because it is a FAULTY concept for them to have connectivity. COnnectivity is exactly what the manufacturers seek to avoid with these items not only for security but also to ensure that once you buy the bastard you always have to contact them for any repair , just a like a car so fucked to work on you need to take it to the dealer for an oil change because you have to take off the front right tire to get at the oil filter or spend 3 hours removing the bumper on your cadillac to change the HID headlight.

https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2016/09/20/which-voting-machines-can-be-hacked-through-the-internet/

Multiple voting machines have wireless connectivity.

hacking voting machines =FAKE

Google the first part of that equation to find you're wrong.

Also, I believe this is an attempt to frame the recently leaked document by Reality Winner as unimportant. Hacking voting machines was not the only reason for those attacks, I can expand on that if anyone likes.

hence noone hacked them did they that would be know as election fraud wouldnt it, who has a controlling interest in diebold? George Soros. So yeah that is my point you cant hack them and unless russians were there they couldnt affect the election and they dont have memory cards they arent cameras. they have internal storage like your hard drive

Seems to be a common trend with this user, at least in my own experience.

How quickly intelligent conversation devolves into boo hoo I dont wanna play and I am taking my toys and going home. I know that soros owns the controlling shares in not only the company that was called die bold but also several other companies that make voting machines. I don't care what information you have gleamed from bloomberg owned buisiness insider or snopes or what ever other online rag you take at face value.

I simply called you out on your statement in a respectful manner. I am sorry you are unable to do so yourself (have a respectful converstation that is) . You were probably one of those kids who throws the controller at the screen and cries when mario got bit by a gumba too.

No where did i state that I disagree with my initial post. I simply asked you to look at your logic and see that it is completely flawed.

fact checking is a trendy term for damage control and spin these days ever notice that the only facts getting checked lately are ones that don'f fit the progressive agenda.

I thought you were done listening to me but you keep coming back for more. I have a job and am retiring for the evening. I need to go out and locate underground utilities so our contractors and construction companies can keep moving ahead at making america great again through fixing our roads and infrastructure and help people know where it is safe to dig in their yards.

Is your job meaningful and does it contribute to society or are you paid to post on reddit?

Green apple Red apple. Both apples. Both wrong both mislead. Both brainwashed. Both spouting communist talking points. Both like to put things into very narrow categories and divide then use the divide to control. Both lie to win at any cost. Both evil. I don't like your apples.

They are bad apples.

So good you can't tell. Sounds like bull shit to me.

But hey you say both sides are the same.

I'm not the one repeating myself.