You do realize that she was one out of many folks who testified, and that names she brought up were in perfect synchronicity with names other witnesses brought up. There were also folks that participated in this abuse who came out and named names. When did you interview her, and who are you associated with? What is your involvement with the case? Why are you replying to an old article after all this time? Something stinks about you.

https://isgp-studies.com/belgian-x-dossiers-of-the-dutroux-affair

I have read a little bit on the whole affair, and I do not believe you. Even if what you say is true, you do realize that there are many victim witnesses in the Dutroux affair, not just x1 or Regina. I am having a hard time believing you and feel you are pushing an agenda. Discussing the franklin scandal also brings up strange folks who seem to be completely prepared to shut those up who are trying to make sense of it and research these topics. What was your thesis on? Why were you doing it on the dutroux affair? What is your motive in this? If you are a reasonable person then you would understand my concern about you, and know that the dutroux affair did not just involve Regina.

If you read some of the articles concerning Regina during the whole affair you would see the naked attempts at shutting this case down, and how cruelly she was treated. I mean it is on a bizarre level and flagrantly obvious they did not want her to talk. I also find her to be honest.

"proof" that they were falsely accused? That is ridiculous, man. You cannot "prove" that somebody is lying unless they actually come out and say they are lying, or have evidence showing that the stories are made up. This has NEVER been the case for most of the x witnesses. A couple witnesses are not as reliable as the rest, but still some of their testimony cannot be put aside when there are direct correlations made (that could not have been hoaxed in any way) with other witnesses statements. Some of these children suffered severe psychological disturbances from these events, and some evil men and women mocked the children or discounted their testimony because of this, especially when dealing with DID (which is an all to real, yet very rare, disorder). To conflate evil with people who believe the victims who suffered in this cabal is horribly evil. You are filth and scum and are continuing the cover-up. The legal system betrayed those kids. The media betrayed them. There is MORE than enough evidence for a very real elite pedophile ring and it's covering up. The witnesses statements usually always correlate with one another. A couple of the witnesses are not as trustworthy as others, but those that we can trust have explained things that could not have been hoaxed. Too many connections and corroborations between them were made when they never had an ability to make contact to align their stories. There were even people in these pedophile rings who spilled the beans on fellow perpetrators, one even killed himself out of guilt.

I am fine with folks who have a healthy skepticism and wish to validate a story. This is a noble and good thing. I can even tolerate the dogmatic skeptics, but I smell a rat and a shill in you. You are aiding those who tortured and raped children. Anybody who reads your comments will see this.

Read all the available info for yourselves guys, and come up with your own conclusion. The website I listed is a genuinely good source (though in certain aspects I thoroughly disagree with him). It is hard reading, but when you search through the whole of the matter, the sheer obviousness of the existence of this pedophile ring is damning.

https://isgp-studies.com/belgian-x-dossiers-of-the-dutroux-affair

Again a warning for anybody going to the website. There is extremely disturbing content on it, and it is hard to read. Still though the guy gives an honest account of what happened to these children in Belgium. This suffering still goes on all around us, and in almost every country. The franklin scandal is another one of these cases that should be studied.

Oh dont pull that "offensive to the memories of the girls" horseshit on me, this is a damn conspiracy site you idiot. I can read citations, by the way. The citations listed by the site owner come from multiple sources and not just from a single book. Damn it man you are simplifying it all. There were indeed news articles released concerning the affair (most basically ridiculing the witnesses) and not much evidence given in those articles. The corroboration of the stories of these witnesses with information that was not publicly available is enough for me to believe something really fucked up was going on. I just flat out disagree with you. You are either simplifying complex portions of the case, or are blurring truth with falsehoods.

What made you do this as your college thesis? What was your motive behind it? The flagrant covering up of this whole affair alone by so many civil servants and individuals of power is enough to shroud it all in a stink that will never go away, and yet you paint the whole case with a broad brush as if it has absolutely no merit.

I may not be erudite, or good at getting my thoughts across, but I can smell bullshit fairly well, and you stink, man. I do not like your intentions here. You did not come at this seeming genuine. If you did have concerns about the case you could give me specific episodes that bother you and simply reason with me. Instead you went on the offensive and seem to have just as much of a personal agenda behind this case in attacking it as those who were effected by it.

In short-- blow it out your ass. Especially with that last sanctimonious diatribe. That shit does not work on me or other folks here at r/conspiracy.