Are you open to the possibility dinosaurs are a fakery?
0 2017-06-21 by 435435435
Whilst it sounds a a bit strange at first there's a lot of evidence dinosaurs are quite suss
Could it be a hoax?
0 2017-06-21 by 435435435
Whilst it sounds a a bit strange at first there's a lot of evidence dinosaurs are quite suss
Could it be a hoax?
71 comments
n/a HowManyWerePureTho 2017-06-21
More open to the possibility that you're disinfo tbh
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
That ... I am a disinformation agent?
Nope just a guy asking a question
n/a HowManyWerePureTho 2017-06-21
FTFY
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
The last discussion I made was asking how come a chimney at the holocaust was constructed in... 1947 by the Russians.
So it's fairly safe bet your wrong on this one
n/a Iamamansass 2017-06-21
17 day old account with the same habits as previous users accusing posters here... Yeah ok.
n/a HowManyWerePureTho 2017-06-21
Account created on 4/20, no wonder it spews incoherent BS amirite
n/a Iamamansass 2017-06-21
That must be it...
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
Talk bout dinosaurs or go away pls
n/a heavyheavylowlowz 2017-06-21
dinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodinodino
n/a sleepeacefully 2017-06-21
hey everyone look! it's the guy who comes to r/conspiracy every day just just to debunk. he's definitely not a paid troll/s
n/a HowManyWerePureTho 2017-06-21
I wish I was paid for helping you goys
n/a joe_jaywalker 2017-06-21
The reservations that immediately come to mind:
Were not dinosaurs discovered back in the 19th century or some long time ago?
Are there not dig sites on all continents of the world?
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
Youbare correct.
The official story is no dinosaurs were ever Found in the ancient or middle ages
n/a fuck_im_stoned 2017-06-21
We only know what we are told.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
Why are told they "may" have found dinosaur bones in the ancient times an this "may" be why we have a dragon mythology ...
n/a g3374r2d2 2017-06-21
Dragon mythology stems back to plasma eruptions in the sky around the original Saturn sun due to magnetic electric interactions occurring.
Hence the lightning and fire and feathers and whiskers protruding often.
Tails of plasma drawn as a beast. There are lots of plasma discharge drawings that were most likely in the sky a long time ago.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
Cool.
I've just read the pro dinosaur lobby is claim dragons are proof of the ancients findin dinosaurs.
Which sounds fishy to me
n/a g3374r2d2 2017-06-21
Sounds like a guess to me.
I'm pretty convinced ancient cave paintings were drawings of plasma discharges and the sun symbolism that came shortly after stemmed from different perspectives of the lining up of Venus mars and Saturn and the product of the reflecting light from Sol behind Saturn.
A polar lined solar system with electrically charged alike planets on different poles of the central sun. Something set them differently and the intersecting polarity between the different planets caused Motion instead of locking. This is probably what created gravity. The plasma reactions between the differently charged electric bodies in space on a vacuum cause motion because electricity is a binary function moving from charge to opposite charge.
We are created out of harmonized electricity vibrating as matter in a limited physical space being focused in through our pineal gland when we are awake.
We are fragmentations of the same original perception and opportunity and our ego creates the illusion that we are individual but we actually share everything.
Dinosaurs seem like a control mechanism to keep the pieces separated more than they already are. Gut feeling because any time tptb bank on nostalgia and money making product off of science I get really skeptical.
Jurassic park was almost just too much for me to not feel like the idea of dinosaurs was being force fed to my childhood. "Appealing" to my sense of wonder.
I don't really try to confirm my bias so much in regards to dinosaurs though. I let the information come to me and as it does I definitely see some suspicious connections between limited scientists working on them and the funding.
The associated aftermath of science that came after their discovery and my uneasy feeling with a lot of that on its own doesn't help my trust in paleo-archeologists on a Dino quest.
The bottom line is that the more I look into the things that the elite are obsessed with I find underlying "truths" that "rewrite" my ideas of how distractions work for the profane.
We may find out someday the extent of the lies, but the "program" is very well written.
n/a I_Love_Jesus_101 2017-06-21
After seeing these obviously fake alien mummy https://imgur.com/a/rpC2F, I'm open to challenging the status quo about dinosaurs. It's about time that an audit is done on the supposed dinosaur fossils.
n/a WeAreTheSheeple 2017-06-21
The mummy could be real. It has been there for 800+ years apparently but I am still skeptical.
n/a I_Love_Jesus_101 2017-06-21
Yes, the alien could be real, although I highly doubt it. I think we definitely need to check out the dinosaur bones to see if they're actually real, rather than taking the word of the so called experts.
n/a moparornocar 2017-06-21
you can see the plaster marks and such on the mummy. its pretty obivously fake from the vid.
n/a David_Grrrlmour 2017-06-21
Yes. In the sense that i really want to read a conspiracy theory about it...
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
Nice one. I recommend "dinosaurs are fake" into your search engine. More convincing than I initially expected
n/a heavyheavylowlowz 2017-06-21
No one is denying fiction can be convincing. Magicians can be convincing. Doesn't mean it's true/real.
n/a kamspy 2017-06-21
It's crazy how few actual bones there are. I never knew all the skeletons in museums were replicas.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
Never found a whole skeleton ...
n/a hoonigan_4wd 2017-06-21
So the other half they do find, what is that?
n/a FORKinmyDICK 2017-06-21
Wait seriously? How much do they find before making a replica?
n/a kamspy 2017-06-21
I forget the specifics, but it's far far less than you would expect. Who knows, maybe it's all you need.
n/a rodental 2017-06-21
No, idiot.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
Some dinosaurs hearts would of had to way 2/3 Tons just to get blood to its head
Impressive yes?
n/a rodental 2017-06-21
One, source for that claim, because it seems a bit high.
Two, visit the Royal Tyrell museum.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
One, you called me an idiot so look it up yourself you lazy rude person.
Museums have mostly fake bones. Most all dinosaurs found are less than 50%
n/a postpin 2017-06-21
I'm pretty sure museums admit that every bone/skeleton on display is a fake copy/replica.
Whether or not they have the real ones in the back somewhere is up to debate. Personally, I don't.
n/a rodental 2017-06-21
Ok, I did, estimates are around 150k- 200kg for a brachiosaur.
Royal Tyrell has several nearly complete skeletons. They do use plaster replicas to preserve the originals and fill in gaps. I dated a girl who worked there for 2 years.
Sorry man, I shouldn't have called you an idiot, that was rude.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
It has been calculated that the left ventricle of the dinosaur’s heart would have to weigh 2 metric tons to pump blood that high. That is 15 times heaver than the left ventricle of whales. Such an enormous heart muscle would have consumed 64% of the dinosaur’s energy (basal metabolism), leaving the creature little energy for everything else
Neuroscience Explains Why Dinosaurs Couldn’t Get Any Bigger June 8, 2016R. Douglas Fields Leave
That k I was just messing around ie. name calling its all good
n/a rodental 2017-06-21
Source?
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
I put the source, r Douglas fields , PhD
Just put a search 'dinosaur heart two tons' And a number of other experts come up discussing it
n/a rodental 2017-06-21
I did. That seems like a ludicrously high estimate, that would mean that 5-10% of a brachiosaur's total weight was heart, and no animal has had a ratio that high, it's generally around 1%.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
I know ... That's why I'm askin are they fake?
n/a rodental 2017-06-21
Okay, never hear of that one, but i looked it up. It's not that much bigger than a brachi, ratio is still way off.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
Think bigger... Dreadnoughtus dinosaurs
n/a rodental 2017-06-21
As far as I know brachiosaur and brontosaur were the tallest and most massive dinosaurs.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
Theyve changed it since we were at school
n/a rodental 2017-06-21
Yeah, apparently. They do have a partial skeleton, so seems legit.
n/a CelineHagbard 2017-06-21
Removed. Rule 4.
n/a of_mendez 2017-06-21
It is a ruse to hide the Giant humans from the past
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
You mean how the Smithsonian threw out all those giant bones?
n/a Iamamansass 2017-06-21
Giant/animal hybrids
n/a Step2TheJep 2017-06-21
lol how is this the most upvoted post in this thread?
To answer the OP's question, yes of course I am open-minded to it. The problem is that most of the youtubers who talk about this stuff are straight up charlatans and intellectual frauds. They make all people who question dinosaurs look crazy.
n/a Rd2See-Leusi 2017-06-21
Look, man. Just examine the evidence of the very first dinosaur. Start there and watch your worldview unwind. The were fake from day one.
Terrible lizard!!!! RARRRR!!!!!!
Fucking hilarious that people fell for it, tbh.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
People think Santa Claus is real.
It's not that hilarious really... How would we know otherwise? If you are taught it since you are small and impressionable
n/a Rd2See-Leusi 2017-06-21
Yea, that was a bit sardonic. It's a sad state of affairs. I'm truly angered by the way these thought-cages were constructed to lockup our minds so many years before we were born. The manner in which they are further enforced by our own contemporaries is just pathetic.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
Amen
n/a Mental-Cramp 2017-06-21
Go watch the siberian "ethical" ivory hunters blast their own tunnels out for mammoth tusks using fire fighting pumps and hoses. They pull lots of mammoth and woolly rhino skeletons out from under the permafrost. Pretty convincing if you ask me but maybe you only think the older fossil records are being deceptive. I have a couple paliontologists in the extended family and nope... they aren't out there suffering for years at a time in awful conditions to cast fake bones. They could do that pretty easily w/o all the skin cancer and frostbite if that was the trick.
n/a Red_Tricks 2017-06-21
I'm assuming he means all the bones being found aren't dinosaurs, but of course someone who went through college and was taught "these bones are dinosaur bones" wouldn't see anything wrong with them.
They wouldn't know they were being lied to either, if their knowledge was based off lies.
I don't know about this theory too much, just clearing stuff up.
n/a postpin 2017-06-21
Yeah I'm fully on board with Dinosaurs being either completely fake, or at the very least we're being lied to about them to the point where the mainstream belief is nearly completely false.
Look into the first discoveries and tell me that is the sketchiest stuff.
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
I'll do that. Thanks for the tip
n/a postpin 2017-06-21
IIRC they only found a tooth or two and then imagined what the rest of the dinosaur would look like based off that.
Later on there were two scientists competing and discovering over 100 dinosaurs each per year.
n/a rolltide26 2017-06-21
Got any sources for looking in to the early dinosaur discoveries?
n/a postpin 2017-06-21
Here's a video I enjoyed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KXzgeq1BuA
n/a rolltide26 2017-06-21
I'll check it out. Thanks.
n/a FORKinmyDICK 2017-06-21
Didn't they just mismatch different bones together that didn't even fit just to have more than the other?
n/a postpin 2017-06-21
Yes, and they've been caught mixing elephant, giraffe, and whale bones for some of them.
n/a lab52 2017-06-21
Yes. i am open to everything.
I think maybe it's more along the lines that they haven't put together an accurate picture of what dinosaurs looked like based on their bones.
Perfect example - the T-Rex actually had feathers and did not look the way the mainstream society has depicted it.
n/a heavyheavylowlowz 2017-06-21
I heard some speculations about this. Especially with velociraptors. Never saw it as being 100% confirmed or agreed upon in the scientific community.
n/a Zybbo 2017-06-21
I don't discard they being real.
But I also think humans had some kind of contact with at least a few of them - thus giving origin to legends of dragons.
Also, is always funny how their "artistic depictions" keep changing throughout the years.
One of the most curious fact about them for me is the discovery of the soft fossil..
n/a Passthetzatziki 2017-06-21
I read somewhere, I'll try to dig it up, that dinosaurs are when reptilians ruled earth or something.
n/a PhrenicAcid 2017-06-21
No.
n/a ghostofpedro 2017-06-21
Clues Forum has a thread devoted to debunking dinosaurs full of detailed analysis and photographic evidence:
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=29&start=270&t=1594
Full of detailed analysis and photographic evidence.
n/a heavyheavylowlowz 2017-06-21
What would be the end game of creating the hoax, developing a science dedicated to it, and funding research?
What purpose does the hoax serve?
n/a 435435435 2017-06-21
I put the source, r Douglas fields , PhD
Just put a search 'dinosaur heart two tons' And a number of other experts come up discussing it
n/a HowManyWerePureTho 2017-06-21
I wish I was paid for helping you goys
n/a g3374r2d2 2017-06-21
Sounds like a guess to me.
I'm pretty convinced ancient cave paintings were drawings of plasma discharges and the sun symbolism that came shortly after stemmed from different perspectives of the lining up of Venus mars and Saturn and the product of the reflecting light from Sol behind Saturn.
A polar lined solar system with electrically charged alike planets on different poles of the central sun. Something set them differently and the intersecting polarity between the different planets caused Motion instead of locking. This is probably what created gravity. The plasma reactions between the differently charged electric bodies in space on a vacuum cause motion because electricity is a binary function moving from charge to opposite charge.
We are created out of harmonized electricity vibrating as matter in a limited physical space being focused in through our pineal gland when we are awake.
We are fragmentations of the same original perception and opportunity and our ego creates the illusion that we are individual but we actually share everything.
Dinosaurs seem like a control mechanism to keep the pieces separated more than they already are. Gut feeling because any time tptb bank on nostalgia and money making product off of science I get really skeptical.
Jurassic park was almost just too much for me to not feel like the idea of dinosaurs was being force fed to my childhood. "Appealing" to my sense of wonder.
I don't really try to confirm my bias so much in regards to dinosaurs though. I let the information come to me and as it does I definitely see some suspicious connections between limited scientists working on them and the funding.
The associated aftermath of science that came after their discovery and my uneasy feeling with a lot of that on its own doesn't help my trust in paleo-archeologists on a Dino quest.
The bottom line is that the more I look into the things that the elite are obsessed with I find underlying "truths" that "rewrite" my ideas of how distractions work for the profane.
We may find out someday the extent of the lies, but the "program" is very well written.