Washington Post once again running false story. Tell me more about how they're a trusted news source.
76 2017-06-28 by AIsuicide
From the article:
"Those strikes came after Assad’s military dropped sarin nerve agent on the northern town of Khan Sheikhoun, killing scores of civilians and leaving hospitals overflowing with hundreds more casualties".
This is bullshit. The "Joint Investigative Mechanism" of the UN is still reviewing evidence from the Khan Sheikhoun incident. It is their mandate to assign blame or responsibility,
They have not released any of their findings yet.
Link to article:
48 comments
n/a TheMadQuixotician 2017-06-28
Do you also have a link to the current status of the investigation? I hadn't heard anything about the Joint Investigative Mechanism
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
They don't supply any current status updates. Not many people know about JIM, because they aren't told about them.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Here's link to one story run on it. Also of curiosity is that many of the articles run about this use the phrase "chemical weapons watchdog" when referring to the OPCW.
http://www.news1130.com/2017/05/23/un-chemical-experts-found-sarin-exposure-in-syria-attack/
n/a birdman5000 2017-06-28
someone should create a sticky enumerating all of the MSM bullshit stories..just keep an active count. make a game of it
n/a HempCO719 2017-06-28
r/fakenews
n/a drpussycookermd 2017-06-28
I'm sorry, but why does the WP need to wait on a UN investigation?
n/a Rockin_Dead 2017-06-28
Cause they made daddy trump look bad.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
How are they making him look bad? This WaPo article does everything it can to support his actions.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Do you understand the fact that no-one has supplied any solid evidence that Assad was responsible for the chemical attack at Khan Sheikhoun?
n/a drpussycookermd 2017-06-28
What is "firm" evidence? Seems there's plenty of evidence pointing to Assad. What, that's not "firm" enough for you? Perhaps "firm" evidence is a direct admission by Assad himself? Perhaps posted directly through reddit with a verification pic of him holding a snoo?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
"Seems there's plenty of evidence pointing to Assad"
Show me evidence. Link me the sources.
I've been researching this and posting on it for just a little while now.
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/67r9ng/france_declares_sarin_samples_from_aprils_khan/
n/a DestroyBabylonSystem 2017-06-28
u/drpussycookermd?.................................and that's a doughnut with a glazing of fail.
Nice try at maintaining the status quo or "just playing devils advocate bro".
Not that you had any to begin with but you lost any point or credibility immediately when you wrote: "Perhaps posted directly through reddit with a verification pic of him holding a snoo?"
n/a drpussycookermd 2017-06-28
Dude, I'm not gonna read blogspot.blogspot.com and watch a bunch of stupid youtube videos.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Find any evidence to show me? Didn't bother to even look?
n/a drpussycookermd 2017-06-28
Dude, the evidence was widely reported on in April globally. I'm not going google for you. If you didn't believe the "MSM" then, you're not gonna believe it now. So, it's kind of waste of everybody's time.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
But you believe it, right? And that's what counts, right? But you can't back it up with any sources. So really..you're the one wasting people's time.
n/a drpussycookermd 2017-06-28
Were alive three months ago?
n/a HideFoundHide 2017-06-28
There's no evidence Sarin was even present. The supposed victims could not have been contaminated with Sarin, unless Sarin's toxicity is overstated by a factor of 10.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Supposedly the OPCW took samples from victims who were brought to Turkey.
Supposedly the UK also "smuggled" samples out of Syria to reach their conclusions.
Important to note that this is the intelligence that Trump received, both from French and UK intelligence sources.
n/a HideFoundHide 2017-06-28
Intelligence sources sure are trusty, trustworthy rather.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Watch for the word "hexamine". It will be getting a lot of use soon.
What they will neglect to say is that hexamine has numerous industrial uses.
Also of interest. Hexamine up until the UN report of the 2014 attack in Ghouta wasn't really known as an ingredient in chemical weapons.
To this date, blame has not been assigned for the Ghouta attack.
n/a HideFoundHide 2017-06-28
If they honestly run with that they are retards because the forensic profile is going to be obvious to any chemist.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
The French intelligence report already ran with it. That's the report everyone is using. Not OPCWs.
French analysis of the chemical compounds from the site also pointed to the presence of sarin, hexamine and diisopropyl methylphosphonate, a compound formed when sarin is synthesised. The chemicals found there essentially match the biological fingerprint of the Assad government’s sarin manufacturing process, as the same chemicals were found in samples collected from a 2013 attack in the town of Saraqeb in Idlib, which was also linked to the regime.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/26/syria-assad-forces-carried-out-sarin-attack-says-french-intelligence
n/a HideFoundHide 2017-06-28
Funny.
n/a HereWeGoAgainDude 2017-06-28
Do you know something that President Trump and the rest of the modern world do not know about the networking of Syria?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
I know alot more than what anyone is being told obviously:
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/67r9ng/france_declares_sarin_samples_from_aprils_khan/
n/a HereWeGoAgainDude 2017-06-28
Just because you post a lot about this doesn't mean you know anything. Anybody can post shit.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Hundreds of hours of research versus you talking shit.
n/a HereWeGoAgainDude 2017-06-28
Sure bud. I'm sure you're hard hitting research comes directly from Russia Today. Nice work pal.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Do you have anything to add besides shit talking?
n/a HereWeGoAgainDude 2017-06-28
You don't provide any proof to any of the shit you say. You just link to a washington post article and call it bullshit. Let's see your sources big guy.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
I need a source to prove that the OPCW sent their evidence to the Joint Investigative Mechanism of the UN? Which is proper protocol.
I need a source stating JIM hasn't released their report yet?
n/a jrlovejr92 2017-06-28
So the Washington Post, who is supposed to be a CIA front bent on tearing down Trump, is running an article that vindicates Trump's strike on Syria. Hard to keep up with all these changing allegiances.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
There are no changing alliances. The agenda to balkanize Syria has never stopped.
n/a IanPhlegming 2017-06-28
When Trump does something the CIA wants, they'll support him. He got suckered on the Syria thing, though really he just bombed an airbase and nobody dies and it was up and running again in two days. If it even really happened, that is.
n/a HideFoundHide 2017-06-28
Funny how Sarin always finds its way when its connected to money from Soros/Rothschilds/Rockefeller network.
Sarin in Soviet Russia. Sarin in Nazi Germany (enough to kill 50,000,000 - but they used Delousing agents instead for mass killing)
Sarin connected to ISIS and Al-Q operations in Libya and region. (This was uncovered before the Syria narrative took off).
Something about that chemical. Also it's impossible to have been Sarin by the stated LD50 and hazardous of the agent. There were people without hazmat suits on tending to the "victims".
n/a skralogy 2017-06-28
Thats like saying the bush administration had fake news because the 911 report wasnt finished. Come the fuck on.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Show me proof. Show me anything besides the foreign Minister of France saying French intelligence "independent of OPCW" has determined that Assad is responsible.
Because that's what everyone reported.
They then reported that OPCW found incontrovertible evidence of Sarin or "Sarin -like substance".
And those findings are based on the presence of "hexamine".
That's it. That's all they have.
Prove me wrong.
n/a skralogy 2017-06-28
Im not arguing the facts of the sarin gas attack, im arguing the validity of your argument. You are saying that because the investigation into the attack is not finalized, then wapo cant assume that assad committed the attack. And that they are fake news.
Which is alot like saying the bush administration is putting out fake information about osama bin laden being responsible, just because the 911 report is not finished.
Get it?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Do they state it's an assumption?
n/a skralogy 2017-06-28
It came from the white house and the united states government. If you were writing an article the us fucking government should suffice as a source.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Your credibility on this sub should be zero after that comment.
n/a majestik6 2017-06-28
I just spit out my drink I laughed so hard
n/a Rising_Silva 2017-06-28
Keep up the good work and dont let these morons get to you
n/a skralogy 2017-06-28
Im not saying they are honest, they are the biggest power in the world, when they say something it becomes news. Why is that hard for you to understand?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
The Washington Post is still a shit bucket. What's so hard to understand
n/a skralogy 2017-06-28
Good one, very impartial of you. /S
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
And by your logic...the Washington Post should accept the White House saying there's no collusion with Russia.
n/a skralogy 2017-06-28
They do, if the white house says something it becomes a story. Have you not been paying attention?
n/a Rockin_Dead 2017-06-28
Cause they made daddy trump look bad.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Do you understand the fact that no-one has supplied any solid evidence that Assad was responsible for the chemical attack at Khan Sheikhoun?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
But you believe it, right? And that's what counts, right? But you can't back it up with any sources. So really..you're the one wasting people's time.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-06-28
Watch for the word "hexamine". It will be getting a lot of use soon.
What they will neglect to say is that hexamine has numerous industrial uses.
Also of interest. Hexamine up until the UN report of the 2014 attack in Ghouta wasn't really known as an ingredient in chemical weapons.
To this date, blame has not been assigned for the Ghouta attack.