We need to all do what Okeefe is doing. (Independent camera phone journalism)
26 2017-06-30 by LightBringerFlex
It doesn't have to be undercover journalism but there are so many good opportunities on the table.
We,can all go to any bank and make a fool out the bankers with questions like, "Are you aware that the people found out how you bankers are robbing our communities blind?" Imagine the reaction in the face of the bankers. They would probabaly flip out occasionally. We can take our best clips and put them on YouTube which would further red pill the masses.
We can go into police stations and ask them if they are aware that most of the politicians they work for are pedophiles. Again, grab the best clips and post it up on social media.
We can go to our local city halls and tell them we know they are only pretending to serve the people but in reality, they are a self serving mafia. Again, take the clips and post on social media.
The idea is to make it fun by asking questions that contain massive truth bombs that TPTB really don't want us to discuss. And we will be asking these questions directly to TPTB shills.
If we all do this on our camera phones occasionally, we can catch some nice meltdowns along with other kooky clips (i.e. Being thrown out of the bank would make them look like they have something to hide).
We would essentially be harvesting good clips simply through the power of numbers law. People occasionally get a good clip and entertain and red pill the rest of us. This would also motivate the people if they notice a pattern of movements among the others. It would motivate many to repeat the behavior.
We need to do creative things and this is just one idea that would work for sure. It would feel like a nice kick in the as for TPTB.
Okeefe should inspire us all especially those into journalism.
37 comments
n/a tjswooshmenzada 2017-06-30
WTF
n/a Mike_McDermott 2017-06-30
Peaceful, guerilla "warfare". I like it.
n/a munstops 2017-06-30
As much as I think OKeefe did some Ok work, this is dumb... The purpose of his "mission" is the behind the scenes of why or what they think, of how they are working. Now if you had some irrefutable evidence that someone is a pedo, for instance, and you are trying to catch them out in the open in the act type of shit that is different.
But OP may be trolling
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
You don't need smoking gun evidence. This isn't a court case. We are trying to put them in awkward situations on tape by throwing truth bombs in their face.
n/a munstops 2017-06-30
Just cause some person has a dominatrix fetish doesnt mean you should put them in the spotlight for it. It needs to be a legitimate thing that truly represents the values as a company or person on the outside to what they actually believe on the inside
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
I think you are overcomplicating it. I'm simply talking about going to a bank and asking them why they are loaning out 10x the amount of money they have and bankrupting our communities to line their own pockets. The people want to know so I am here asking you.
Very simple, straight forward and honest questions. The issue is that they know they are evil and corrupt so some of them will flip out live on camera. Those flip out moments will tell the audience an entire story which is that these people are in fact guilty of human enslavement using slimy techniques.
n/a munstops 2017-06-30
The bank thing, a teller is just a teller. Got a cousin that worked as one... Dumb as a brick. They know nothing. Youre just putting them on the spot for no reason. Honestly even the bank manager isnt that far up. They have a start amount and they have an end amount, and the numbers have to add/sub/equal a specific number. You would have to go to a banks HQ to do this.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
You go to the guy that looks like he's in charge, not some 18 year old teller. We do this in the masses. Even if 1% of us are successful, we will succeed in the stated mission.
n/a UnverifiedAllegation 2017-06-30
where do you work
n/a dustbowldano 2017-06-30
This is nonsense. You can't just go making blanket accusations like this. It would make you look like a lunatic attention whore. Build a case and then confront a guilty party.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
Ya I can.
n/a MindYourBusyness 2017-06-30
At this point our energy would be better spent working to raise the number of conscious people in our own society. The system is too big to chip away at in this way, and it leaves a lot of room for false flags, psyops, misdirection and slandering of the truth sayers. That's easy for them to do. Changing peoples minds once they've opened up is close to impossible.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
We are already chipping away at the system. I'm only offering a new line we can chip away at.
The idea I should to get embarrassing moments that clearly makes the culprit look like he got caught with his "hand in the cookie jar." You cat so this to politicians because they are well trained with mental gymnastics to talk their way out of anything but you can do it on their minions. A bank manager is high enough to know how dirty the bankers are. I wouldn't be surprised if most bank employees know but they are so desperate for a job, they just keep their mouth shut. Some of them would even be happy to see us because they want the bank to be caught but they don't want to lose their jobs so they stay silent.
n/a MindYourBusyness 2017-06-30
Well, by all means get out there and get involed, I just don't think it's practical in most scenarios because chances are any bank manager at your local wells fargo is not some kind of evil person who is going to let any beans spill. More likely he's just a person trying to pay for his family's needs. Sure if there are real names of guilty people out there with real evidence of wrong doing this is not a bad idea, but generalizing like you are is a recipe for turning the blame on our own team and not hitting the target.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
Every single person working for a criminal organization is only trying to pay for his family's needs. We aren't looking to hurt these people. We are trying to expose the people they work for by approaching the minions.
n/a MindYourBusyness 2017-06-30
At that rate we will be going into Walmart superstores across the nation shoving cameras in manager's faces because the owner of Walmart is the bad guy. How does this make any sense? I think you need to reevaluate the steps in your equation.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
Sure, ask for he Walmart manager and ask him something like this:
The Walmart family makes X amount of money (it's an insanely high number) yet they only pay you $11 an hour. How do you feel about that?
I wouldn't do corporations myself. I would aim for the worst of the worst which are the banks and government buildings.
The higher up bankers are hiding behind lower level bankers so we are forced to approach lower level bakers.
n/a NimSauce 2017-06-30
Be sure to edit the footage as much to fit w/e narrative and tone you are aiming for.
n/a MannequinFlyswatter 2017-06-30
Playing devil's advocate here. This seems like a very easy way for MSM to dismiss entire groups of people. If we're walking into these places confronting people while they do their job, accusing them of helping support pedophilia and the like. The general response will be "uhhh, wtf??" If it gets attention, I doubt it will be in favor of the one behind the camera.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
The power of numbers takes care of that. If some were to jump on this, there would thousands of recordings a day. We only need a few good ones to upload every day to show the population how the deep state is cracking. It will also put the fear of God in them. We will also inspire others to follow our tracks making the movement even bigger.
Before you know it, the bankers will feel uncomfortable going to work because they don't know what to expect.
Also, we would be fingering them out to the public. By doing what we are doing, we are pointing to the bankers and telling the world who the real terrorists are. The most frightening thing for them is exposure and by ousting them, we will be doing the word a favor.
n/a MannequinFlyswatter 2017-06-30
How do you figure? I suppose if it were well coordinated it is possible but to generate a wave of not only public distaste for the powers that be, but it seems like at the very least some careful thought and planning needs to go into this
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
I very much value to word "practical" because when the masses are presented with complicated ideas, they tend to ignore it. For this reason, we need practical ideas that any Joe can easily understand and do.
The idea here is just to jump start things where random people go on their own time and do their own thing when they feel inspired. This clears up all the hassles of meeting similataneously. It give some people the ability to act on their own without waiting for some central command. Also, organizing willing people takes a long time. It's better if a few people push on this and they inspire a couple more, and those inspire a couple more, etc.. Before you know it, we will have a wave of people.
Did you see when Bill Cosby almost had a meltdown in public when the people realized he raped many women. That is the effect we want to capture on camera. It's VERY telling.
We have no choice unless you are ok with slavery for the rest of your life.
n/a Agnos 2017-06-30
This is not investigative journalism, it is gotcha journalism...does not change the system.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
But it exposes them. We are trying to rip the mask of fear their face and expose them for the wolves they really are. That is what they fear most. Being exposed is death.
n/a Agnos 2017-06-30
It exposes very few of them, not the system they represent. See what happened during Clinton impeachment, Hustler I believe put lots of money on sexual dirt of Republican congressmen. A few got snagged, I believe 2 speakers of the house had to quit. It changed nothing.
If you have the time, energy, money, it is better to do investigative journalism that will affect the system, alas mainstream media rarely does, and usually only to pursue special interests.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
Well, we can all do custom things. Some people can do investigative journalism. Others can do gotcha journalism. Whatever. As long as we do something productive so we can get to our end goals a little quicker.
n/a munstops 2017-06-30
I agree.
n/a UnverifiedAllegation 2017-06-30
please do and upload the results here. dont edit like okeefe though, that shits too transparent
n/a High_Level_Insider_ 2017-06-30
Even better, start running surveillance on the elites and see what they're up to.
n/a atheists4jesus 2017-06-30
Who are they and what is their schedule?
n/a High_Level_Insider_ 2017-06-30
Bankers, royalty, secret societies, heads of corporations, generals, governors, congress.
n/a nliausacmmv 2017-06-30
Do we have to edit the footage to completely change the meaning of what was said or can we let someone else do that for us?
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
However you like. We edit the footage just to show the good parts like Okeefe does.
n/a nliausacmmv 2017-06-30
So, like that Planned Parenthood video where the full shows an almost entirely different conversation with entirely different intentions and meanings? Good to know you think that's the bar for honesty.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
I never said be dishonest. If you are interviewing an employee and he stops for 10 minutes to take a shit, you should edit the 10 minutes where he takes a shit and jump right into the interview. Nobody wants to wait 10 minutes so just edit it out.
n/a nliausacmmv 2017-06-30
Except you said to edit like O'Keefe, so you did actually say to be doshonest. Removing context and rearranging to create a meaning that wasn't actually there is dishonest. That's what O'Keefe does. So do you want honesty, or do you want O'Keefe? Because those are mutually exclusive.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
This is the first time I have heard anyone accuse of okeef being dishonest.
n/a nliausacmmv 2017-06-30
You clearly don't venture out much, do you? He's been convicted for this sort of thing before. It's pretty clear if you watch the completely uncut footage that the conversation that actually took place was not at all like that in the video. That's why he doesn't release the full footage unless he has to turn it over in court; his entire narrative falls apart if you get to actually see what happened.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
Well, if you have proof, send it over so we can all get to the bottom of this conspiracy.
n/a Bumbo_clot 2017-06-30
You really think some middle aged bank teller who hates there job is going to give a fuck?
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-06-30
Yes.