I've never seen anyone on this sub make that claim and I'm even skeptical whether you will be able to easily source it from any of the other sites on your list, but superiority of intellect is not an accurate indicator of the political prominence Jews enjoy disproportionately.
First, white peoples in general come from traditionally industries societies. This means that white people as a matter of cultural heritage engage more in industries where labor and product are key, while Jews traditionally engage in professions such as banking, academia, political science, and the arts, more abstract or esoteric fields. This puts Jews at a proportional advantage in these fields, as a relatively low percentage of whites (and by the way other races like Asians and blacks) participate.
The other concept that puts Jews at an advantage in their respective fields is that of tribalism. Moreso than modern whites (and gentiles in general), Jews express comradery amongst their own. This allows them to take advantage of the strength in numbers they already have in said fields, and dominate in those professions as a group.
The other concept that puts Jews at an advantage in their respective fields is that of tribalism. Moreso than modern whites (and gentiles in general), Jews express comradery amongst their own.
Everyone participates in tribalism. That's why it's called tribalism.
Kinda fantastic sleight of hand when you think about it huh? They get a protected space to practice racial exceptionalism, and people like me whose family came to the US long after the civil war from countries that didn't even participate in the foul racist stuff get to bear the brunt of the criticism. While the Zionists get to run around making Hitler look like a good guy in comparison unscathed.
Hard work and talent...that's all it takes, right?
Tribalism is in every culture, long before Jews existed. Why singly fault a group of people for something every group does. It isn't a Jewish trait. We like those we know, those we can relate to.
Actually, I disagree...I really don't like those I know, and get along great with everyone else. SO, there is one counter to your generalization.
And also, who said fault? YOU DID. And you know it. Every group does not hold the strings to most major sources of communication and banking in the world, so I blithely disagree. I KNOW how banking works, but I can work as hard or as intelligently as I want and I'm not going to crack into the banking system. Or the communication industry. Also, most people don't FAKE their identities in real life to blend in with the general populace more.
I could go on, but why? You know I'm right, and tribalism is a WEAK excuse for poor behavior and morals.
I really don't like those I know, and get along great with everyone else. SO, there is one counter to your generalization
Anecdotes aren't "counters" to generalizations, tribalism is a real concept, and you "not liking those you know" doesn't mean you know every white person on Earth.
And also, who said fault? YOU DID. And you know it.
That's the point of the question, as to why Jews are considered "behind everything" by those who believe Whites are the "master race".
Not a contradiction, not a source of guilt, and I didn't blame you for anything - so don't take banal words personally.
Every group does not hold the strings to most major sources of communication and banking in the world, so I blithely disagree.
You do realize, don't you, that banking was originally established by the Catholic Church, and then later "modernized" by the North Irish, Roman Catholics, and White Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASPs)?
Also, most people don't FAKE their identities in real life to blend in with the general populace more.
Most people who "fake" their identities are immigrants who want to "anglicize" their names for easier pronounciation by the local populace. All immigrant groups do this, from Poles, to Indians, to Italians, to Asians.
Should we blame Johnny for not wanting to be known as Chung Fu?
I could go on, but why? You know I'm right, and tribalism is a WEAK excuse for poor behavior and morals.
If you could, you would. But you have no real sources other than what you believe. And that's fine, if you want to blame a group of people for things that every immigrant group does, if you want to blame "mysterious strings" on one group when historically it was founded by another, go ahead. But at least be honest with yourself that there's no real veracity to your claims. Admit it's a personal belief rather than anything upheld by scientific standards.
And no, tribalism isn't an "excuse" for poor behaviors and morals. That's just your opinion, man.
You can link all you want. The first article you link states nowhere what you claimed, just how the Church reacted to various economic ideas. The second one is a book, and NOWHERE does it state that they ORIGINATED it.
In fact, a simply wikipedia check refutes your point. Good day.
That is pretty weak, dude. Your "article" was about usury, which is a different concept than banking. Your book was inaccessible. Your sources are garbage. I don't have to source, because you should be able to find the TOP PARAGRAPH of the wikipedia article...and you are blocked.
Also...ALL immigrant groups DO NOT change their name. That is a bald-faced lie, like most of your post. And Jews change their name AFTER they have already come here. It's not because their names are hard to say. (source: I know a lotta Jews).
No its not it's just plain old antisemitism, the same shit people been doing for 100s of years.
There's no conspiracy at all here, never has been. Jews simply work hard because they've constantly being fucked over, so their average for success is slightly better than most.
That's it, you're just being an asshole by continually bringing it up like Jews are evil or something.
Or... read a history book and stop spreading nonsense?
Recent social science works argues that 1) since Jews were the most common religious minority in Christian Europe, they were the ones most commonly persecuted against, 2) that a lot of the Medieval struggles around nationalism have to do with negotiations of elites around the beginnings of modern state formation/centralization, 3) The traditional answer of the late Medieval religious revival, including the Crusades, that ultimately led to the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation, which mattered in some places (especially when tied to Blood Libel), just not the French and English cases I mentioned, 4) eventually the goal of religious homogeneity presaged the overall goal of cultural homogeneity of nationalism. Again, this is all primarily in Europe until the 19th century, though there were large populations of Jews in Anatolia, North Africa, Mesopotamia, Arabia, and Persia who were mostly unmolested. This, I think, is evidence that the repeated expulsion of the Jews is not necessarily something inherent in the Jews, but something (or several things) that characterized the relationship between Jewish minorities and Christian rulers during this period.
Gas lighting lol. They've been kicked out of 300 countries, even recently they were kicked out of a small South American village. If everyone in the world hates you, chances are you're an asshole.
Read a book.. Seriously you're so confident yet you litearly know nothing about the topic.. Except the fact that you're spreading hate for no reason..
Let's start at the beginning. In 722 BCE, the Northern Kingdom of Israel fell to the Assyrians and the majority of its population was apparently expelled. These are the "Ten Lost Tribes". This sort of forced migration seems to be part of standard part of Assyrian management of newly conquered territories. In about 586 BCE, the Southern Kingdom of Judah (remember, that Israel had been divided into two distinct kingdoms) was conquered by Babylon, and only the notables led off (the "Babylonian exile"). In neither of these cases do the Hebrew/Jews seems to be particularly singled out.
Lets skip to the Roman Era. Here, the Jews are unique. Roman policy granted wide religious freedom--however, there were two exceptions. 1) secret "mystery cults" were widely suspected, 2) groups that refused to sacrifice to the emperor (first Jews, later also Christians) were treated as suspect. The Jews led a series of wars against the Empire called the "Jewish Wars" that ended up with the destruction of the Temple after the First Jewish–Roman War (67-70 CE) and ultimately the majority of the Jewish population of Roman Province of Judea being killed, exiled, or sold into slavery in the aftermath of the Bar Kokhba Revolt (132 – 136 CE). These are exemplary of the unique relationship Jews have within the Roman Empire, but is likely not what you're asking about.
Most of what people think of are the Medieval and Early Modern expulsions from states in Christian Europe. One thing to note is that Jews existed in these places at all. No other religion besides Christianity existed in these states at all. Judaism had a special status that, say, Roman Paganism did not, and therefore they (often) were the only religious minority allowed to exist. So, it's important to note, they were the only religious minority that could be expelled from Europe (besides various Christian "heretics"). It's worth noting that the vast majority of expulsions of Jews were done by Christians, with a few isolated (and generally late) cases of expulsion by Muslim rulers.
Karen Barkey and Ira Katznelson have an interesting article, whose name I forgot, that argues that the expulsion of the Jews by England in 1290 and France around the same time were the result of "state formation"/"state making". Remember, for most of post-Roman history the centralized state as we imagine didn't exist. It was an overlapping series of domains where rulers claimed varying levels of sovereignty. Katznelson and Barkey argue that the Jews were expelled in England as a compromise between the royalty and the nobility in the process of state formation (primarily, the nobility owned Jewish bankers a tremendous amount of money, as Jews often formed the only source of credit). In France, they argue that they were expelled for a different reason (I believe because the King owed them money, but I can't be sure). But in both cases, though the exact reasons were different, the expulsion of the Jews was part of the same process of state formation, a result of negotiations around the clashing interests of royalty and nobility. This pattern, they argue, is repeated in other states (Western and Northern Europe is generally seen at the vanguard of modern state formation in Europe--see Charles Tilly's epic Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1992).
It's also worth mentioning that Jews were often the only available scapegoats. Many of the expulsions took place during plagues, especially in Germany, where Jews were often accused of poisoning wells. They were also often occurred after an accusation of blood libel. Historically, it's worth noting that blood libel accusation (which date back to at least the 12th century in Christian Europe) never occurred in the Islamic World until the 19th century, and even there, not coincidentally, the first several cases accusation were brought by Christians living under Ottoman Rule at the same there was expanding European influence in the Ottoman. But in general, the relationship with minority communities was different in the Ottoman World (much is made of "dhimmi" status, but there's a reason for that--especially in the Ottoman Empire, the "millet system" in both formal and informal forms was an important strategy for rule). In the Muslim World, Jews and Christians were often included alongside Muslims as (unequal) subjects in a way that they were not in Europe. Granted, even these limited rights were frequently violated, but this legal framework of (unequal) belonging provided the Jews (and minority Christians) with much more stability than they had in most of Europe of the same period. This situation remains essentially until nationalism arrives in the 19th century century.
Nationalism, the idea that the legitimacy of the state comes from its relationship with a titular "nation" (France is for the French, Germany for the Germans), generally dates only back to the French Revolution (this is the traditional starting date). There were of course other forms identity underlying the legitimacy of states before this--especially religion, as John Armstrong argues in Nations Before Nationalism, but this wasn't really nationalism in the sense that we see (a political demand for a Christian state for all the Christian, etc.). A few scholars--Philip Gorski, Liah Greenfeld, Anthony Marx--have argued, convincingly I think, that we should see nationalism as an Early Modern phenomenon, rather than entirely a Modern one (remembering that "the Modern Era" for political history is conventionally dated to around the French Revolution). Among these, Marx argues most convincingly that nationalism comes not just from union--gathering all the Rutherians into the Rutherian state--but from exclusion. He engages with three main examples (England, Spain, and France). In Spain, we see this process of expulsion--this Proto-Spanish nationalism--in the form of the expulsion of Muslims and Jews from Spain in 1492 (and from Portugal in 1496). This sets the ground for the later Spanish nation state. Similarly, in France we see expulsions, but not of Jews. Rather, we see France kill and expel Protestants to create a purely Catholic realm (cf. St. Bartholomew's Day massacre in 1572). These sorts of expulsions were common during the European "Wars of Religion". So nationalism, and the drive to create in theory culturally homogenous states, wasn't merely a process that affected the Jews, though it was a process that often affected the Jews. It's also worth noting that "Jewish emancipation"--Jew being able function as equal citizens--doesn't emerge until the French Revolution, and the question of whether Jews can really be members of the nation-state isn't settled until the 19th and 20th centuries (cf. the Dreyfus Affair in France, or the Nazi stripping of the rights of German Jews). Many of the expulsions of Jews (and Catholics and Protestants, etc.) that occur during the early Modern Period, Anthony Marx argues, should be seen as examples of emerging nationalism where cultural identity becomes tied to the polity (compare this to earlier empires which were inherently diverse).
So, therefore, recent social science works argues that 1) since Jews were the most common religious minority in Christian Europe, they were the ones most commonly persecuted against, 2) that a lot of the Medieval struggles around nationalism have to do with negotiations of elites around the beginnings of modern state formation/centralization, 3) I forgot to mention also the traditional answer of the late Medieval religious revival, including the Crusades, that ultimately led to the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation, which mattered in some places (especially when tied to Blood Libel), just not the French and English cases I mentioned, 4) eventually the goal of religious homogeneity presaged the overall goal of cultural homogeneity of nationalism. Again, this is all primarily in Europe until the 19th century, though there were large populations of Jews in Anatolia, North Africa, Mesopotamia, Arabia, and Persia who were mostly unmolested. This, I think, is evidence that the repeated expulsion of the Jews is not necessarily something inherent in the Jews, but something (or several things) that characterized the relationship between Jewish minorities and Christian rulers during this period.
Edit: One final note. In the video, they often repeat the names of territories in a relatively short period. The reason for this is Jews were expelled, here for either reasons related to Christian religious revival or debts due to state formation, and then were at times often quickly let back in for economic reasons (i.e. the state needed lines of credit that only the Jews could provide in this period), and then quickly expelled either for economic reasons again (rulers had quickly racked up debt) or because of a deal with religious revivalists. But the reasons they were let back in hints at one of the reasons they were expelled.
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
Lol a Reddit link. I'm not reading that shit. I see who's in control now and why the Middle East is fucked up and the Palestinians are being wiped out. Totally not the Oded Yinon plan. I see who runs the media and spreads all the hate and misinformation. I see what's happening in Europe and who is behind the EU. Totally not the Kalergi plan though. I'll keep spreading truth, you keep spreading Jewish lies.
Funny how King Casimir I of Poland only allowed Jewish people to stay in Poland if they limited usury to 8%...I would LOVE to see a law like that regardless of race.
"Master Race" was a theory posited by French aristocrat Arthur de Gobineau in the 19th century. It partially inspired the racial policies of the Nazi party. What does it have to do with Jewish control, something driven and enabled by tribalism and group loyalty?
I simply want to know why people think Whites are the master race, if those same people also think the Jews control their societies. Isn't there an inherent contradiction, a paradox of sorts?
Because nearly everything called beautiful from art to culture originated in the white race. Jews are extremely cunning in the sense that they have invaded and control all societies, but they still have never beaten whites in that aspect.
It's a good question. I think we should acknowledge that if they do control the world that's pretty impressive, I take my tiny half hat off to them. If they are clever enough to control the world from the shadows maybe give them a shot at running it the open. They are clearly superior to the rest of us.
Because no one can resist a Nordic beauty, and the Jews know that their intelligence is so great it can withstand a little diluting in the name of good poon.
But to fair, most of the time they get a Negro to do the dirty work, as it were.
Because no one can resist a Nordic beauty, and the Jews know that their intelligence is so great it can withstand a little diluting in the name of good poon.
But to fair, most of the time they get a Negro to do the dirty work, as it were.
49 comments
n/a WeAreTheSheeple 2017-07-06
The whites are the puppets, the Jews are the brains behind the operation. Most of the whites don't even realise they are being manipulated.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
So then...Jews are the "master race" because they're always back on top no matter what?
n/a globalism_sux 2017-07-06
Master race theory is a 19th century postulation, largely discounted in contemporary science and genetics.
Jewish tribalism leads to organized control of the power structure of Western governments.
What is the point of this thread?
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
I am curious as to why Daily Stormer, Stormfront, fullchan, halfchan, and this sub, believe that Whites are superior, and Jews are always at the top.
Hence the question.
n/a globalism_sux 2017-07-06
I've never seen anyone on this sub make that claim and I'm even skeptical whether you will be able to easily source it from any of the other sites on your list, but superiority of intellect is not an accurate indicator of the political prominence Jews enjoy disproportionately.
First, white peoples in general come from traditionally industries societies. This means that white people as a matter of cultural heritage engage more in industries where labor and product are key, while Jews traditionally engage in professions such as banking, academia, political science, and the arts, more abstract or esoteric fields. This puts Jews at a proportional advantage in these fields, as a relatively low percentage of whites (and by the way other races like Asians and blacks) participate.
The other concept that puts Jews at an advantage in their respective fields is that of tribalism. Moreso than modern whites (and gentiles in general), Jews express comradery amongst their own. This allows them to take advantage of the strength in numbers they already have in said fields, and dominate in those professions as a group.
Hope this answers your question. Have a good one!
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Everyone participates in tribalism. That's why it's called tribalism.
n/a globalism_sux 2017-07-06
Some groups more than others.
n/a downisupp 2017-07-06
THIS :https://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/albert_pike_third_world_war_ww3.png
yeaah the jews are the true puppets master? or are they? :o
n/a FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2017-07-06
Matthew 12:26King James Version (KJV)
Those who can't see it, don't understand.
n/a mastigia 2017-07-06
Kinda fantastic sleight of hand when you think about it huh? They get a protected space to practice racial exceptionalism, and people like me whose family came to the US long after the civil war from countries that didn't even participate in the foul racist stuff get to bear the brunt of the criticism. While the Zionists get to run around making Hitler look like a good guy in comparison unscathed.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Seems like mental gymnastics to me. How can Jews control everything, yet nothing at the same time?
Zionism existed since the 1800s though, with Theodore Herzl.
n/a mastigia 2017-07-06
Mental gymnastics? Yeah whatever dude.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Can you explain why it's not mental gymnastics?
After all, how can Jews control everything, yet nothing at the same time?
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
The "cream" rises to the top...look at CEOs of major companies, especially media. I can't explain it, but it is there.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
You mean hard work and talent?
Oprah, Ted Turner, Rupert Murdoch, Carlos Slim, all Jews, amiright?
As with anything in life, if you can't explain it properly, then you don't know it well enough.
The quote's owner? Albert Einstein.
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
No, I was making a bad joke. In fact, I used to hang out in one of the densest areas of Jews in the WORLD.
Hard work and talent...that's all it takes, right?
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Tribalism is in every culture, long before Jews existed. Why singly fault a group of people for something every group does. It isn't a Jewish trait. We like those we know, those we can relate to.
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
Actually, I disagree...I really don't like those I know, and get along great with everyone else. SO, there is one counter to your generalization.
And also, who said fault? YOU DID. And you know it. Every group does not hold the strings to most major sources of communication and banking in the world, so I blithely disagree. I KNOW how banking works, but I can work as hard or as intelligently as I want and I'm not going to crack into the banking system. Or the communication industry. Also, most people don't FAKE their identities in real life to blend in with the general populace more.
I could go on, but why? You know I'm right, and tribalism is a WEAK excuse for poor behavior and morals.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Anecdotes aren't "counters" to generalizations, tribalism is a real concept, and you "not liking those you know" doesn't mean you know every white person on Earth.
That's the point of the question, as to why Jews are considered "behind everything" by those who believe Whites are the "master race".
Not a contradiction, not a source of guilt, and I didn't blame you for anything - so don't take banal words personally.
You do realize, don't you, that banking was originally established by the Catholic Church, and then later "modernized" by the North Irish, Roman Catholics, and White Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASPs)?
Most people who "fake" their identities are immigrants who want to "anglicize" their names for easier pronounciation by the local populace. All immigrant groups do this, from Poles, to Indians, to Italians, to Asians.
Should we blame Johnny for not wanting to be known as Chung Fu?
If you could, you would. But you have no real sources other than what you believe. And that's fine, if you want to blame a group of people for things that every immigrant group does, if you want to blame "mysterious strings" on one group when historically it was founded by another, go ahead. But at least be honest with yourself that there's no real veracity to your claims. Admit it's a personal belief rather than anything upheld by scientific standards.
And no, tribalism isn't an "excuse" for poor behaviors and morals. That's just your opinion, man.
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
"Admit it's a personal belief rather than anything upheld by scientific standards."
You don't post anything scientific.
I didn't say tribalism isn't a concept, it's just that you can transcend it.
I never blamed anything on a group and you keep saying I do.
Banking WAS NOT originally established by the Catholic church.
If you don't source anything, never do I.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15235c.htm
https://www.amazon.ca/Gods-Bankers-History-Money-Vatican/dp/1416576576
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
You can link all you want. The first article you link states nowhere what you claimed, just how the Church reacted to various economic ideas. The second one is a book, and NOWHERE does it state that they ORIGINATED it.
In fact, a simply wikipedia check refutes your point. Good day.
Crap links, and crap argument.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
The lack of your source is surprising.
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
Do you want me to link to wikipedia? Or can you find it yourself?
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
You made the claim!
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
And you linked to a BOOK for sale on Amazon?
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Technically, any book is a book for sale.
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
Wikipedia under "banking" clearly states it started well before the advent of the Catholic Church.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Then you should provide a link.
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
That is pretty weak, dude. Your "article" was about usury, which is a different concept than banking. Your book was inaccessible. Your sources are garbage. I don't have to source, because you should be able to find the TOP PARAGRAPH of the wikipedia article...and you are blocked.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Wow! A completely rational response!
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
Also...ALL immigrant groups DO NOT change their name. That is a bald-faced lie, like most of your post. And Jews change their name AFTER they have already come here. It's not because their names are hard to say. (source: I know a lotta Jews).
n/a TomHanksRapesKids 2017-07-06
They control the US foreign policy, the media, the banks, most sports. What are you talking about?
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Do you have sources for this claim?
n/a Rd2See-Leusi 2017-07-06
Good question. Maybe start by listing the major achievements of Jews throughout history so that we have a basis of comparison?
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
I figure this is a good start.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_Nobel_laureates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_Nobel_laureates
n/a Rd2See-Leusi 2017-07-06
More interested in actual achievements. I remember a certain President being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for... well, nothing.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
That's just the thing, Peace Prizes are, and always have been, bullshit.
I was referring to the bulk of the wins (for both religions) in the actual sciences.
n/a quienchingados 2017-07-06
Because decoys are important to be safe. And if the decoy is half the population then everyone is safe.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Which begs the questions:
1) How do you know you're the decoy?
2) How do you know about the existence of the decoy plan in the first place?
n/a helpmesleep666 2017-07-06
When did this sub become /r/antisemitism ?
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Because I was curious as to, well, "Why are Whites considered the "master race" if Jews control everything?"
n/a helpmesleep666 2017-07-06
No its not it's just plain old antisemitism, the same shit people been doing for 100s of years.
There's no conspiracy at all here, never has been. Jews simply work hard because they've constantly being fucked over, so their average for success is slightly better than most.
That's it, you're just being an asshole by continually bringing it up like Jews are evil or something.
n/a ConspiracyAccount 2017-07-06
Nah, they fuck themselves over. Always have.
n/a helpmesleep666 2017-07-06
Or... read a history book and stop spreading nonsense?
n/a TomHanksRapesKids 2017-07-06
Social science! Lol
n/a helpmesleep666 2017-07-06
...history.
n/a TomHanksRapesKids 2017-07-06
The first sentence in your quote literally says: Recent social science works argues that...
n/a helpmesleep666 2017-07-06
Based on History..
Or would you like to gaslight me and convince me none of this happened?
n/a TomHanksRapesKids 2017-07-06
Gas lighting lol. They've been kicked out of 300 countries, even recently they were kicked out of a small South American village. If everyone in the world hates you, chances are you're an asshole.
n/a helpmesleep666 2017-07-06
Read a book.. Seriously you're so confident yet you litearly know nothing about the topic.. Except the fact that you're spreading hate for no reason..
n/a AutoModerator 2017-07-06
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
n/a TomHanksRapesKids 2017-07-06
Lol a Reddit link. I'm not reading that shit. I see who's in control now and why the Middle East is fucked up and the Palestinians are being wiped out. Totally not the Oded Yinon plan. I see who runs the media and spreads all the hate and misinformation. I see what's happening in Europe and who is behind the EU. Totally not the Kalergi plan though. I'll keep spreading truth, you keep spreading Jewish lies.
n/a helpmesleep666 2017-07-06
Right.. you know nothing about History, and you refuse to learn.. Which probably explains your ass backwards racist ideals.
n/a ConspiracyAccount 2017-07-06
When everyone around you is an asshole it's probably you who are the asshole.
n/a Xaviermgk 2017-07-06
Funny how King Casimir I of Poland only allowed Jewish people to stay in Poland if they limited usury to 8%...I would LOVE to see a law like that regardless of race.
n/a callmebaiken 2017-07-06
http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-white-response-to-haaretz-article/
n/a globalism_sux 2017-07-06
"Master Race" was a theory posited by French aristocrat Arthur de Gobineau in the 19th century. It partially inspired the racial policies of the Nazi party. What does it have to do with Jewish control, something driven and enabled by tribalism and group loyalty?
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
That's what I'm here to find out.
n/a globalism_sux 2017-07-06
Ok.
It doesn't.
Satisfied now?
n/a helpmesleep666 2017-07-06
No.. apparently the point is to vilify the Jews further not absolve them.
n/a globalism_sux 2017-07-06
The point of what?
n/a helpmesleep666 2017-07-06
Whatever OP is on a quest for.. lol
n/a globalism_sux 2017-07-06
If you don't even know what it is, how do you know that he's trying to "vilify Jews"?
n/a helpmesleep666 2017-07-06
Right starting threads in conspiracy sub about why Jews control everything isn't trying to vilify Jews..
Or.. am I misreading that.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
I'm not stating why Jews control everything.
I'm asking why those who believe Whites are the master race, believe that Jews run the show. Seems contradictory in nature to have that worldview.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Not here to vilify Jews.
I simply want to know why people think Whites are the master race, if those same people also think the Jews control their societies. Isn't there an inherent contradiction, a paradox of sorts?
n/a ragegenx 2017-07-06
How do you think they get the goy to do all of the frontline work?
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
circular reasoning?
n/a HibikiSS 2017-07-06
Because nearly everything called beautiful from art to culture originated in the white race. Jews are extremely cunning in the sense that they have invaded and control all societies, but they still have never beaten whites in that aspect.
n/a Yield85 2017-07-06
It's a good question. I think we should acknowledge that if they do control the world that's pretty impressive, I take my tiny half hat off to them. If they are clever enough to control the world from the shadows maybe give them a shot at running it the open. They are clearly superior to the rest of us.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
We've never had a Jewish President. It was hard enough to elect JFK (back when Catholicism was taboo).
n/a MightyRushOfEagles 2017-07-06
Because everyone wants to steal our women.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Gal Gadot though...
n/a MightyRushOfEagles 2017-07-06
Because no one can resist a Nordic beauty, and the Jews know that their intelligence is so great it can withstand a little diluting in the name of good poon.
But to fair, most of the time they get a Negro to do the dirty work, as it were.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
Remove the cake-pounds of makeup, dial back the plastic surgery, and the Aryan Goddess Megyn Kelly becomes anything but!
n/a MightyRushOfEagles 2017-07-06
First of all no one mentioned Megyn Kelly and beauty in the same sentence. She is the dollar store brand Jenny McCarthy.
The being said, she was kinda cute in 1995.
n/a MrJohnGrayson 2017-07-06
So then...Jews are the "master race" because they're always back on top no matter what?
n/a downisupp 2017-07-06
THIS :https://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/albert_pike_third_world_war_ww3.png
yeaah the jews are the true puppets master? or are they? :o
n/a FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2017-07-06
Matthew 12:26King James Version (KJV)
Those who can't see it, don't understand.
n/a MightyRushOfEagles 2017-07-06
Because no one can resist a Nordic beauty, and the Jews know that their intelligence is so great it can withstand a little diluting in the name of good poon.
But to fair, most of the time they get a Negro to do the dirty work, as it were.