This sub is dead.
12 2017-07-09 by Sechts
With the recent sticky banning cnn links, this sub has become everything it attempts to warn you about.
They act like they're taking the high ground sticking up for a user who is being threatened with doxxing by cnn, yet no less than 2 of their mods were actively supporting/involved in the phishing and doxxing of its own users.
Reject censorship.
Reject hypocritical partisan politics.
Unsubscribe from this sub and save yourself the eventual ban participating in this hate sub will garner you.
Practice what you preach.
107 comments
n/a Hyperion_Gardener 2017-07-09
We need a /r/realconspiracy now more than ever, does it exist?
n/a Juicebochts 2017-07-09
r/conspiracyII
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
r/conspiracyII
r/actualconspiracy
r/uncensorednews
Thats all i know if,but we need to get the fuck away from this bullshit sub.
n/a Hyperion_Gardener 2017-07-09
Yeah people are actively working to subvert it?
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
So go. Did you do anything here while you were here?
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Yes,i just delete my shit so i dont have to worry about people stalking my account when i say something they disagree with. Because this subs mods support peopleharassing anyone who disagrees with their propaganda.
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
So that is crazy. I will defend your ability to say it, but just the same it is a childish perspective.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Its childish not to be able to hold everythinf to the same standards just because you disagree with what one place believes.
And thanks for wanting to stixk up for free speach,but youre defending censorship. Even if you hate cnn, which i do, its not okay to hold them to a higher standard than every other msm source.
n/a JamesColesPardon 2017-07-09
Removed. Rule 10. Yawn.
n/a mjusmjus 2017-07-09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaG5SAw1n0c
n/a ABrilliantDisaster 2017-07-09
"Reject censorship."
how's r/politics treating you?
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Ill let you know when they start banning certain sources.
n/a LeftousCrusader 2017-07-09
You gotta be kidding me.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Just because pro right sites dont get upvoted doesnt mean the sources are banned. They have to pay for their shills to upvote and downvote certain topics/sources.
This sub is cutting out the middle man and going right to the mods to silence dissenting opinions,as well as having donald bots spamming the place.
You used to have the freedom to post whatever source you wanted here, ans let the information speak for itself. We dont have to worry about that here, not anymore!
Now the mods are actively controlling what we can post...
r/politics is fucking garbage, but theyre not banning breitbart, sputnik, rt, or 4chan. Nope. Because those sources are the only real news.
Give me a fucking break
n/a xCaffeineQueen 2017-07-09
Nothing has been banned, what's your motive here?
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Go to the front page of the sub, cnn has been forbidden to be posted as links.
And my motive is im a fuxking cnn shill, thats why i shit all over them and their ridiculous censhorship.
Oh wait. Thats here too, not just cnn and i call it out everywhere.
n/a xCaffeineQueen 2017-07-09
It is so CNN doesn't make money from anything posted here. You can still post their shitty propaganda here all you want, no narratives are being silenced.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Then once again, MAKE THAT THE STANDARD.
Dont go out of your way to be against msm when youre only targeting the one place that is pushing back against someone making shit up.
Do the same thing for all sources, unless youre only against cnn,and not all msm.
n/a xCaffeineQueen 2017-07-09
CNN went out of their way to threaten someone for making a gif about them, that is why this is about CNN.
I understand your sentiment, but there's a reason behind why this is happening that doesn't involve the other shitty propaganda machines. They haven't been insulted by a picture, found out the person's identity and their post history, and threatened to show it to the world if he didn't say 'in check.'
I'd say if you really feel strongly about this, stop piggybacking this specific case so hard and find out how to connect the two together casually (general MSM and this CNN situation) and toss the idea out there and see how it's received. But the way this idea is shaped doesn't fit what you're trying to accomplish currently.
But wait, you want to make it a standard, but your post title said this sub is dead because of the censorship; what's up with this inconsistency? Now you WANT censorship?
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Youre twisting this into something its not.
Plenty of other sources have done questionable shit, but cnn is the only one being held toa higher standard.
And im not aaking for censorship of anything, im asking for every source to be held to the same standard. Theyre all garbage, why single one out?
And like you said,its not censorship, its just denying cnn ad revenue and clicks. Why are you against only cnn being forced to be posted through archives?
Are they the only one spreadinf propaganda?
n/a xCaffeineQueen 2017-07-09
I don't twist things, I try to understand. What is the questionable shit other networks have done? Do you have links? I'm not saying this to defend them, I'm saying this to help you organize a bit outside of the mind if you truly feel strongly about this. You have to organize and lay out things so they can be pieced together easily by others. Was there ever a time when a network threatened a common person for hurting their feelers?
They all are garbage, I wouldn't mind at all to not give them any revenue. But this specific situation is CNN stepped over the line and tried to get their zombies on board with their fucked up attack against a fellow common person. That's why this is about CNN. Do you know what I'm trying to get at?
n/a rave2020 2017-07-09
CNN is the only network that is Retarded enough to Doxx a private citizen.... Do you have any other questions?
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
Why are you so emotional about making all MSM archived?
n/a BentOnVengeance 2017-07-09
If it's legitimate and TRUE then you should have no problem finding it on another site, right? I didn't vote for Trump, don't support Trump and wish like hell they would impeach his ass but at the end of the day, CNN (and FOX) are full of shit. I'm happy they took a stand.
n/a Dorfaladin 2017-07-09
Yeah, they are just sneaky and underhanded and utilize the rating systems to do the work. They create the system by which echo chambers are born, so that no opposition info ever makes it in. Now r/conspiracy is doing this stuff to CNN as a form of boycott (a technique/tool you progressives use and abuse) and I actually totally agree with it. Still though it is not censorship. You are spouting hyperbolic nonsense.
n/a necro_clown 2017-07-09
LOL
n/a ABrilliantDisaster 2017-07-09
Lmao
n/a lastonedown1 2017-07-09
Let's not forget there was no evidence that they were threatening him or going to dox him.
n/a Dorfaladin 2017-07-09
What about the tweet that said that for the time being they would not reveal his identity (as long as he had apologized and retracted everything)? This is a veiled threat, and you know it.
n/a lastonedown1 2017-07-09
That's not doxxing and that's not what they said.
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
Sure it was. It said he apologized and they were refraining from pursuing it further, but that would change if circumstances changed. That isn't a threat?
n/a Dorfaladin 2017-07-09
It is threatening to reveal the anonymous user's identity. That is coercion.
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
Downvoted. As all CNN links will be available through archive.is links, there is no censorship.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Then do the same Shit with every source.
Dont single one out because they dont agree with your partisan bullshit. So go ahead, downvote, but until every source is treated equally, this sub will remain holding its bias.
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
It isn't that we disagree with their partisan stance. Didn't you see the sticky? It is related to the doxxing and coercion.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
The mods advocated and actually assisted in sending phishing schemes to log the users of this subs ip addresses. They attempted to do worse and failed because they dont know how web servers work. The only difference between this sub and cnn is cnn never claimed not to biased, plus theyre not fucking technicologically inept.
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
The mods had no part of the phish attempt, that was a rogue user that was banned for it.
You bringing it up doesn't make sense in relation to the original point of the thread.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Mastigia admitted to helping the guy when he started.
Celinehagbard went out of his way to say what a great job the guy was doing and told him to keep up the good work. The only reaaon they backtracked was because admins got involved.
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
Sounds like you hate the sub. So why not leave? You have no contribution here other than this whine thread.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
I loved this sub.
I hate where its heading.
And i have more than just this post, like i said.i delete my tracks here because i dont want to be targeted with phishing schemes because people disagree with me.
And the mods here support that.
n/a YoureAllRobots 2017-07-09
Ignore Eric, he is one of them even if it is unintentional (he acts like a gatekeeper). You are absolutely correct, though. This sub has been co-opted by The_Donald and it is useless to be here anymore. Them banning CNN is just the first step onto the slippery slope and it is all downhill from here.
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
Another person saying it is useless being here. If you think banning the CNN link is bad, you can always click the original link in the archive link posted. Or just leave if you think it so bad.
n/a YoureAllRobots 2017-07-09
You are such a scumbag.
n/a canttouchme00 2017-07-09
I agree with the sentiment that that move was bullshit
But I disagree that the sub is dead.
The mods are just fucking dumb or paid off
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
What do you mean by users like you still work here?
You are a 2 month account with no posts here.
n/a ABrilliantDisaster 2017-07-09
Well i'll be a badger's uncle. He works here.
n/a Where-is-my-brain 2017-07-09
Freudian slip perhaps?
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-07-09
If we all stop watching CNN, it will bury that CIA shill site real quick. It's not about censorship. CNN is a manipulation factory designed to lead people to their own dooms.
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
But normies love CNN. They aren't stopping watching.
n/a BentOnVengeance 2017-07-09
Don't forget FOX. They do it as well.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-07-09
CNN, FOX, and MSNBC are the kings of fake news. I'm not even liking that new OAN republican station. It smells fishy.
n/a Jesuits_hate_spiders 2017-07-09
CNN isn't banned here and the mods were not doxxing people. By saying those two things show your gross misunderstanding of both.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
The mods advocated and helped that one dude send its users to ip logging sites, and they banned cnn posts that werent through archive.
Those are facts, not opinions.
n/a Jesuits_hate_spiders 2017-07-09
In order to find bots and possible shill networks/software. They were not doxxing people.
Can you still post CNN content here? Yes, you can. Use the archive version. Why give any MSM ad revenue and views?
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Then make that the standard practice. Dont pick and fucking choose which sites to censor.
Breitbart rt and msnbc are just as biased, so is fox news, so are many other sources. Theyre just butthurt because one of their own in the donald is being held accountable for their actions.
This is bullshit.
Just because you can still access the articles through archives doesnt make it any better. Its still censor ship. And every person here should have a problem with it.
n/a Jesuits_hate_spiders 2017-07-09
Before the mods did this, there was a huge push and increase in doing this very thing. What CNN did was the last straw for them. There is no way you can support what the CIA front did. If you do, I seriously question you.
Yes, what CNN did is bullshit. I agree.
It means it's not censored here, that's what it means. They also lose the ad revenue and traffic. Win win.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Youre not responding to my point though.
Once again, if you have a problem with msm, then do this same shit to every msm source.
But keep beating around that bush.
n/a Jesuits_hate_spiders 2017-07-09
Yes I am.
People are starting to.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
No theyre not.
This sub is only doing this to cnn.
And you actively ignored what i said three comments in a row.
What the fuck do you mean youre responding to what i said.
Are we reading the same conversation?
n/a jdotg 2017-07-09
Try talking like a normal person with respect.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
When people actually read the conversation theyre responding to and address the content as such, ill give them the respect of civility, until then, why would i go out of my way to treat them better than theyre treating me?
This isnt a one sided conversation.
n/a jdotg 2017-07-09
I took offense when you started cursing at the dude like that would get your point cross. You just appear as an idiot instead, furthering his point.
You can post CNN links here, just follow the rules.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
You can post archive links of cnn, not direct links.
And i wouldnt talk down to the dude if he would have been actually reading what i said. Youre afforded the respectyou give, and they werent giving me or my words the time of day. Why should they get preferential treatment?
n/a jdotg 2017-07-09
Is there really a difference?
It's just common courtesy I guess, idk man I can't teach you manners.
n/a usernamenn 2017-07-09
Funny you say that. The person you are standing up for is one the rudest, most arrogant people on this subreddit.
n/a rave2020 2017-07-09
If MSN/CBS/ABC / FOX/ and any other news organization does what CNN did I expect the mods banning them the same way they did CNN.... Why are the picking only on CNN ... BECAUSE CNN is the only retarded to doxx a Redditor.....
n/a JUSTIN_HERGINA 2017-07-09
I have advocated to have all MSM shown through archive. Not everyone agreed with me and said it was inhibitive to users posting content in here I am happy that we have started by banning DIRECT links to CNN.
This is not a perfect world, and you don't see me bitching that I didn't get everything I wanted.
Not everyone wants what you want.
n/a maluminse 2017-07-09
What?? To stop bots and shills, a high Reddit priority, (/s) mods led CNN to the guy? No one buys that.
n/a Jesuits_hate_spiders 2017-07-09
I'm confused by your comment?
n/a maluminse 2017-07-09
It's based on your comment. Your claiming Reddit mods were seeking to expose shills. And in doing so it was necessary to doxx the meme creator.
n/a Jesuits_hate_spiders 2017-07-09
The mods here didn't doxx the meme creator? Is English a second language to you?
n/a maluminse 2017-07-09
No. Third
n/a Jesuits_hate_spiders 2017-07-09
Okay? So, now what are you asking again?
n/a maluminse 2017-07-09
Nothing you can answer. Thanks.
n/a Jesuits_hate_spiders 2017-07-09
Okay? Back to https://www.babbel.com/learn-english-online for you.
n/a mjusmjus 2017-07-09
I don't know, are you?
n/a rave2020 2017-07-09
Funny thing looking at someones history.... 8 month old account and the earliest post is from 3 months ago to say to a guy that no that after Trump the markets are bad.... Mmmm I think somebody has an agenda...
n/a 435435435 2017-07-09
Do the society of Jesus dislike spiders?
n/a Jesuits_hate_spiders 2017-07-09
Yes, they do. You should look into the symbolism of my username. Not sure how that relates to my comment though. Seems kind of like a derailment attempt.
n/a 435435435 2017-07-09
Or you could just tell why they don't like spiders
n/a Jesuits_hate_spiders 2017-07-09
Here.. This comment nor does this thread have anything to do with this topic though. So, this will be my last comment on the topic to you.
n/a 435435435 2017-07-09
What a tease
n/a AhuwahZeus 2017-07-09
Jesuit worms are the spiritual waste of Wiccan spiders although sometimes it reversed.
n/a CrookedClintonIsDead 2017-07-09
Holy shit. Stop being such a colossal pussy OP. This place has become a hell-hole of sorts but there is nothing wrong with waiting around for the fireworks to start.
n/a Brodusgus 2017-07-09
Your post is dead.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-09
this sub has legitimately never been better
n/a JamesColesPardon 2017-07-09
It was OK for a bit. No?
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-09
this sub has always been great!
n/a JamesColesPardon 2017-07-09
Peoples tastes change, that's the problem.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-07-09
i mean i can spot a bot from a mile away. people think "shills" influence this sub one way or another. the truth is our collective mind is amplified based on not just our "celestial" position but also if we entertain the idea that our brains work like cell phone towers and the more people who are thinking about one thing the more connections there are "higher bandwidth" more importantly fruitful coherent connections will be made. people get it now i think.
it's seriously gotten to the point where the "hot" on the front page of reddit is just as interesting if not less interesting than new it's fucking nutz.
n/a JamesColesPardon 2017-07-09
Yep. In /r/C_S_T the S stands for Synchronicity.
But here? A broken clock is right twice a day and all.
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
Indeed. And it is true that new is where it is at.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
Yes, it used to be one of, if not the best sub on reddit.
n/a stantheeler 2017-07-09
This is The_Donald now, and they're all a bunch of idiots
n/a SokarRostau 2017-07-09
FTFY.
n/a Dorfaladin 2017-07-09
I would agree with you OP if you did not have a creepy agenda of your own. The progressive shills are as or more corrosive to this sub as those conservative ones. It is not censorship, but it is indeed a form of boycott, and that kind of tool should only be used in dire circumstances. We should not become like the progressives and use their sneaky, underhanded tactics. People can choose for themselves to go to a CNN link or not.
Now if we saw something beyond the pale that CNN did, then yes I agree with a boycott, but it has to be very serious.
For you progressive shills, though, it is NOT censorship. You can post archived links!
n/a Dorfaladin 2017-07-09
Also I am tired of you progressives using the word "hate" for everything. You bastards use "hate" for acts of opposition, acts of defiance, acts of reproof and correction, and acts of anger. These things are not hate! If you use a word as a weapon to browbeat your opponents, that word becomes meaningless. Stop emoting and use your natural God-given reason. This is an example of why you progressives are losing.
n/a EricCarver 2017-07-09
Well said. I will chat with a progressive all day when they tone down the emotion to normal level, ditch the hate rhetoric, and just use logic and reason to shape their points.
n/a CivilianConsumer 2017-07-09
The sub is us, life and this sub is what you make it
n/a skorponok 2017-07-09
I don't have a problem banning CNN. It is propaganda after all, something we fight against.
n/a Sprayface 2017-07-09
True conspiracy theorists only exchange encrypted letters through dead drops!
n/a DARPA-NATOR 2017-07-09
CNN links should be banned at this point, it only drags /Conspiracy down at this point.
n/a Juicebochts 2017-07-09
r/conspiracyII
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
r/conspiracyII
r/actualconspiracy
r/uncensorednews
Thats all i know if,but we need to get the fuck away from this bullshit sub.
n/a Sechts 2017-07-09
The mods advocated and actually assisted in sending phishing schemes to log the users of this subs ip addresses. They attempted to do worse and failed because they dont know how web servers work. The only difference between this sub and cnn is cnn never claimed not to biased, plus theyre not fucking technicologically inept.
n/a 435435435 2017-07-09
Or you could just tell why they don't like spiders