This is just too much retarded for one post. I honestly can't tell is VotL is satire or not.

Either a LARP or someone in need of help. Could be both. People often build fantasy worlds to escape something terrible in their own lives.

It sounds like an intentional disinfo operation to me. Have you heard of Project Blue Beam?

Truth is stranger than fiction.

Bullshit is stranger than truth.

Bullshit is bullshit as much as truth is bullshit. When someone experiences the "bullshit" alarm internally they should be experiencing it with everything else they believe in as well.

The world is symbolic. It cannot be explained in words.

2deep4me

Just tag him

But it's not totally made up. The idea that everyone is just a space alien is something you could never verify. It's a complete time waster.

Okay so lets start with the basics. 1 - you cannot know without observation. 2 - all belief without observation is merely belief.

This is a philosophical axiom that cannot be falsified. It's truth.

Awareness can be defined as the true information people store as "knowledge." False truth would be a lack of awareness. Essentially a gang banger in Chicago could have more awareness than a banker who's afraid of the CEO. It's relative to the individual. The world you live in either has truth and awareness or false awareness and false truth.

In this sense its actually more likely for someone to know god [since its a personal experience] than it is for you to know 1% of the reality you live in. Because you aren't exploring or trying to understand it. And you certainly aren't observing.

A Three Line Epistemology

• Every statement is either true or false.
• It is not possible to observe that a true statement is false.
• It is not possible to observe that a statement is true.

Bastardization of Epistemology. Basic logic. Can you know what you haven't observed? Yes/no.

It is not possible for you to observe that any statement in my epistemology is false.

Semantic nonsense.

Nope. When you understand the limit of certainty you will become a scientist. Until then you're just playing games.

You are talking about "statements" but epistemology is about personal or cultural observations.

You can't prove a personal observation is false. You can prove its true.

Looking back at my response its actually not far from what you seem to be projecting [from my perspective]. My only point was that someone could say "aliens have taken over this world". while on another level someone else could see them as "demons are taking over this world" while on top of that "dimensional entities are taking over this world"

All three are based on the awareness of the individual and not necessarily are any incorrect. If anything it's a nod to epistemological interpretation of reality.

My apologies for twisting the meaning of your post and responding without properly expressing the desired intent.

Epistemology (/ᵻˌpɪstᵻˈmɒlədʒi/ (About this sound listen); from Greek ἐπιστήμη, epistēmē, meaning 'knowledge', and λόγος, logos, meaning 'logical discourse') is the branch of philosophy concerned with the theory of knowledge.[1]

Don't sweat the tone. I'm good to full flame war.

I can put it in experiential terms. It is possible to prove that a statement is false here and now by making an observation here and now. It is not possible to prove that a statement is true always an everywhere because it is not possible to make an observation always and everywhere. (Well, I can't anyway.) It's also true that you can observe that a statement is true here and now by making an observation here and now, but that information is not useful because it is only applicable to there and then.

Very precisely, what science promises is an approximation to the truth that nobody has observed to be false ... yet. Read the history of The Michelson-Morley Interferometer that first revealed that Newtonian Mechanics is a sham.

Im familiar with Michelson-Morely. You might appreciate this thread recently posted

Epistemological understanding is very important when it comes to a holographic universe. This doesn't mean "simulation" so much as a hologram. [2d beings on what they perceive as a 3d surface]

(A holographic universe, an idea first suggested in the 1990s, is one where all the information that makes up our 3-D 'reality' (plus time) is contained in a 2-D surface on its boundaries.

Read more at:

You are probably familiar with this concept: Flatlanders for example

Given that a holographic universe allows for many variations in reality [as well as consciousness field theory] everyone could be the focal point of their own reality. Which has huge implications in epistemology.

Contrary and paradoxically on that point, sometimes its more relevant to the individual to employ basic logic in their life [which in the end breeds epistemological knowledge] where they might ignore outside opinion or unverifiable [personal] knowledge of someone else.

It's in that I misrepresented the point you were making.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

The hologram theory smacks of solipsism/nihilism to me. If life is a game then it's the game I'm playing and I mean to win.

I think you'd enjoy my pet sub: r/TheOpenSingularity

I'd like everyone who participates in it to start by reading /r/TheOpenSingularity/comments/5cwejs/the_inaugural_post/.

Second reply: I suspect that this would amuse you too: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/bitwise/2014/07/roko_s_basilisk_the_most_terrifying_thought_experiment_of_all_time.html

I'm personally hoping that it's wrong, because if it's right I'ma be #1 on that things hit list.

1 - you cannot know without observation. 2 - all belief without observation is merely belief.

That's verificationism, and it's pretty well refuted. You can have acceptable certainty levels without physically seeing everything with your own eyes.

Because you aren't exploring or trying to understand it

?

That's verificationism, and it's pretty well refuted.

Logical fallacy. Appeal to Authority. "We proved this is wrong, believe us."

Prove to me you can "know" anything without observation. Ill wait.

nihilist checking in. prove to me we can know anything.

Please don't actually go around believing people are nihilists. That's like believing people are actual atheists [hilarious laughter here by a friend of mine - no hard feelings].

It's a logical fallacy. They are just confused. People cannot be atheists because they do not know what was before and what comes after death. At the very worst they can be agnostic. They are unaware of their creator so they cannot know they don't have one.

Here's a definition of atheist from a supposedly famous "atheist"

'An atheist has to know a lot more than I know. An atheist is someone who knows there is no god. By some definitions atheism is very stupid.'

Nihilist is in the same category but even worse. They should be aided in coming back to reality. They are lost. They need guidance. That guidance will be for nought if they don't seek their own spirit but at the very least they can be aided by those more aware than they are.

Existentialism often gets lumped in with post-modernism but lets look at the axiom that defines it:

that each individual—not society or religion—is solely responsible for giving meaning to life and living it passionately and sincerely, or "authentically".

Now ask yourself if you have done this.

Oh, no doubt Im lost. But my nihilism ensures I dont care. Prove to me I have a spirit and Ill stop being a nihilist.

There's actually a very easy test for this but it's immoral and unethical to suggest it. Also it may vary somewhat on each individual. It would still be valid no matter the spectrum but terribly negative if used by the wrong person - it also has a wonky turnover of a few months to a few years to a lifetime - so its not recommended.

The best proof is the fact that you will entertain nihilism at all as a personal philosophy. Pretend for a moment people wear their beliefs symbolically on their foreheads - and every one they meet then knows their beliefs. Firstly you are at a disadvantage because someone knows something about you that you believe which makes you a fucking moron - no offence.

Imagine walking up to everyone you meet saying - "this is all meaningless and nothing matters. Fuck you or fuck me. The latter is more beneficial to my animal ego. Choose wisely."

Your not a true nihilist since you haven't engaged the animal ego. A true nihilist would engage to the point they realize a potential, and also realize the opposite. The spirit. To be disillusioned is to have introspection. Which is good. Just drop it for a moment and live life. By the moment. You have a choice to bring meaning to life. If you think nothing has meaning then you would live life to the fullest material and animalistic benefits [and you wouldn't be online].

But you don't do that because you are waiting for the spirit to find you. Find it yourself by giving some meaning to your life for fucks sakes.

You keep mentioning the spirit. If you could please provide proof of this spirit I would really appreciate it. Im open minded and willing to change my mind. Im a nihilist, after all, and really dont have any firm beliefs about anything. So, if you provide me concrete proof that is undeniable, then Ill join your team.

There's no team to join but your own dude. If someone gave you weed and said "do this and get high" you might do it. And get high. They weren't lying to you.

If someone tells you to find the spirit but its super difficult and 90% of people fail or get sidetracked or get lost or end up in a cult [or worse - a religion] ... better just smoke the weed right?

It's not a knock against you. When you are ready you are ready.

It's almost as simple as: the anathema to the ideology you claim to entertain. Life has no meaning = Live life with meaning.

Ironically there are a dozen cheesy idioms that give the very basic truth. "Be true to yourself", "be the change you want to see", "follow your heart", "inside that matters" etc, so on and so forth.

None of these memes help if you aren't open to them. Life is symbolic. If you cannot find meaning in life then at least live without meaning. Go do some really stupid shit and see if it makes you feel better. It won't [you may convince yourself it will for short periods].

But at least then, eventually, you know it won't.

what if Ive already done both and both felt equally meaningless?

You then haven't found what gives your life meaning. So you haven't done both. You cannot do one without acknowledging it. It like saying "I plucked out my eyes but I can still see."

In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king.

Ill keep looking :)

[citation needed]

As other users have pointed out you are advocating verificationism in a strong sense, and that has been abandoned since the first half of the 20th century.

This gives you a good overview of this movement.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-empiricism/

The strong case is easily defeated because it is self refuting. You can not empirically verify the verification principle that you postulate.

There are also a whole host of statements that are not empirical, yet we know them. Mathematical theorems are an obvious example.

Early on, some of his stuff was good (9/11, British royalty, etc.), but he really jumped the shark lately.

People were begging for share blue/ctr shills to turn over proof of what they're doing.... Instead we got the larpers hot topic list.

what do you find difficult to believe?

This:

NASA swapped planes mid air during 9-11.

Dick Cheney showed the 9-11 plans to his employee that was helping with the plans and he said "If you tell anyone about this, I will kill you and your family."

We have bases on moon and mars.

Catholic priests are used to smuggle guns.

The Israeli art students planted bombs (something about the 91st floor) in the twin towers. They also filmed and danced after they took down the buildings. Their van has an image of planes going into towers.

MSM knew about 9-11 as they reported on things not yet happened.

The 3rd tower didn't go as planned.

There are 200 million aliens in human form among us.

Sessions might be some kind of double agent.

Matrix LLC might be a full blown CIA front that handles sessions.

Dems and republicans both bend the knee to a secret group called American Council of Families

The Russian Fertilizer Industry is controlled by the American Council of Families.

People from within these evil Families are seeking revenge against their own family because of the bad things they have done to them and have been working with VOTL this whole time.

Kushner is mentioned to have bad intentions.

Claims alien ships in the sky that are cloaked by changing their vibrational frequency so that the sight sense can't see it.

Putin considered white hat.

Hillary died 9-10-16. The Hillary on 9-11-16 was a malfunctioning clone. That is why she passed out.

Eric braveman is dead and what we see is a clone.

The Nazca mummy is real and cabal wants to deligitamize it.

Podesta is Chester Berintons father and he will go down this year.

Worldcorp is a white hat operation.

The suspected John Podesta abuse video is actually John Podesta.

The Podesta brothers took Madeline McCann.

Kill rooms for children exist all over the world including D.C.

Podesta and deep state members in large Satan club.

Podesta offers children to powerful people.

JP ASH is John Podestas alias.

Some popular names in the Satan worshipping cult include Schumer, Clinton, Weiner, Pelosi, Biden, McCain, Graham, almost everyone at CNN, some late night TV hosts, and plenty in Hollywood.

Soros is high level cabal but there are 4 people above him that happen to be very, very old.

Also, here is a list of current happenings:

DWS/AWAN Story; congressional call for investigation into Comey/Clinton/Lynch; FBI lawyer being investigated; deputy AG in Cali busted for CP.

Images of email. https://m.imgur.com/a/46j7R

Note: VOTL and the Anons are saying they were hoping for bolder happenings today but some things didn't go as planned but they all claim the DWS Awan scandal is going to spark the downfall of the DNC especially now that it was broadcasted on Fix News earlier today.

you are the worst conspiracy theorist in the history of conspiracy theorists if you cant entertain the possibility that some of those things are true.

Because I'm not retarded.

Every one of those is an insane and outlandish claim with literally zero supporting evidence.

so you are saying the 3rd tower DID go as planned?

Have any evidence it didn't? Or that there even was a plan?

Try thinking for once.

The statement is that the third building didnt go as planned. You say thats wrong. Ergo, you think the third building did go as planned. Do you have any proof the third building was destroyed as planned? Because that is your argument at this point.

Wes boy you sure logic'd me, son.

Stick to lurking.

You lost. Want to go through each point one by one? :D

Ignore him.

Op Northwood has existed since 1960, the swapping of planes midair by the CIA. He has no idea what he's talking about and only (intentionally) taking up space to divert.

Maybe Im wasting the time wasters time so the time waster cant waste anyone elses time?

Godspeed, lmao

zero supporting evidence

You wanna try that one again? You mean the Operation Northwood FROM 19 FUCKING 60 that detailed the swapping of planes mid air without air traffic control knowing? THAT declassified CIA operation is "zero supporting evidence"?

Uh huh. Shall I bring up the 25 points of disinformation? Or would you already know that?

And the single shred of evidence, or even hint of a shed for that actually happeneing on 9/11 is where again?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GCeuSr3Mk&feature=player_embedded#t=5208

There, I even time stamped it for you!

Oh, and if you just say "I don't have time to watch", then I guess you REALLY REALLY FOR SOME RANDOM REASON do NOT want to acknowledge actual evidence

Happy watching d:^/)

Cool. So again at no point is there any evidence or even suggestion of NASA swapping them planes. Furthermore, any other 'proof' is literally just random people saying "it's a possibility".

Oh, you watched the whole thing?

That's interesting. So quick!

I watched your time stamp.

Its okay dude, just admit its a theory. Nothing wrong with theories.

Oh, it's definitely a theory.

Just not a baseless theory. Which is exactly your stance, which is wrong.

It's okay to admit that it could be true, and that there are reasons to think it's plausible.

:)

DWS/AWAN Story; congressional call for investigation into Comey/Clinton/Lynch; FBI lawyer being investigated; deputy AG in Cali busted for CP.

you know these stories are all over the news right? You are saying these stories are what, exactly?

No no, I'd love to hear your 200 million alien and NASA swap theory first.

You so rarely meet legitimately delusional people.

Ive never heard of either theory so I have no opinion on them other than they sound interesting. But the difference between you and I is Im being honest. Im not sure what youre being.

Logical.

Youve already failed the logic test my friend. Do you want to try using a different word from your vocabulary?

That means 1 out of 35 people are an alien on Earth.

Some one has to explain to me how we have bases on mars. I have also seen Cobra claim tptb are using human slaves to mine asteroids and other moons in our solar system. It's doubtful we even got to the moon. But mars? And bringing tons of slaves everywhere to mine what exactly?

Depends what timeframe its in.

Ok, I will bite on that. Are you supposing this slave operation transcends our perception of time?

Perception of time is relevant.

Have you ever heard the axiom to travel through space is to travel in time - now consider ways to travel without travelling in space.

Only one I can think of is an astral travel. Like a lucid dream where you take the body from one place to another through the veil.

I have lately began thinking space is the Astral plane. Another layer of consciousness reflected as part of our physical reality. Not accessible by rockets, but by using the consciousness to alter vibration and attention and use the subjective portion of the mind to manipulate reality. Now how could slaves just be abducted and somehow then enlightened and shifted enough in their perception to then go be slaves and mine an asteroid?

See, it makes no sense. Especially if you know they can't get to space with any spaceship. The human consciousness has to expand first to alter how we approach space travel. As it is now it's one big limitation due to lack of awareness about reality and our own minds and what is our true potential if we didn't believe is false ideas.

See, it makes no sense. Especially if you know they can't get to space with any spaceship. The human consciousness has to expand first to alter how we approach space travel.

There is an assumption there that technologies do not exist to interact with different dimensional planes.

Put it this way. The very idea of "you" is flawed. You exist in a larger system. Does an ant realize it answers to the queen?

This is Earth at night stated to be from ISS - orbit

What does it look like?

It looks like architecture. Not the type you may be thinking about. What about computer architecture?

Not trying to convince or project that we are computers or living in a simulation [by definition its impossible as this is the world we know ergo reality] -but the similarities are relevant.

For lack of better phrase: If you are nothing more than an electron passing through the ram on to the CPU [travelling along some major highway] - than what in the name - do you think you might even be able to understand the world around you [??!]. Using basic OS loaded programming no less.

Ill put it this way..the very two pics you shared have something in common. And that they both are associated with computer imaging.

I don't know if you meant to do that or if it was your subconscious giving you a hint. That the reality you are shown is a computer generated image. You don't know what space would be then, because you are not being shown it, you are being shown what a computer would picture it as.

There is no information on this kind of thing in the public domain. Therefore, it's a giant time waster.

I'd be a lot more worried about confirmed conspiracies, like the guys who admit to colluding against everyone else (Freemasons), but pretend there's totally nothing to it.

Well, not entirely a giant time waster. Because there is true things within the muck. It's the stuff like I pointed out that doesn't belong. I don't like when true and false are mixed together and sold as disclosure. So it makes me feel like being suspicious of their motive.

And the masons.. I see all their symbolism stuff, subliminally , in t.v. movies , radio, art magazines, everywhere. Probably nothing to it. Heh.

Probably nothing to it.

You need to stop chasing aliens, and do some serious history reading on the Freemasons.

Scottish rites of free masonry. As far as I know that is tied into it heavily.

In the US, they've muscled their way into control over the other groups. Check out "The Secret War Inside Freemasonry" by Frater X.

Think I've seen it. Been chomping at the bit for a few years at least. Like I said I notice their stuff in everything. Except nature, so I spend more time there.

I think the masons pretty much do whatever they want and the Zionists are with them to fund them and reach the same goal.

So the science & tech exists to get people to distant moons but to extract minerals requires good old fashioned manual labor?

And what is tptb? I wish people would chill out with the acronyms.

Is VOTL paraphrasing from these "emails" it was he giving his cliff notes?

Oh. You remember the guy they took advantage of, fed him a bunch of ufo disinfo?

Not Phil Schneider. It was someone else that talked about Dulce a lot. I'm out at dinner, I'll dig it up when I get home if you are interested. It is one of the best examples of documented disinfo ever.

Either that, or he's in on it. In any case, it's a CIA op.

proof?

He said Hillary Clinton died in September and was replaced by a clone.

That one is hard to believe without more information. I like the idea though!

well, during the election there was talk about Hillary's Health, which was prompted by David Seaman, who later went on to PG fame/infamy

upon retrospect, it seems Hillary's Health was a carefully constructed red herring, to create a scandal where there was none, so that Hillary didn't have to address any real issues (that she's flip-flopped on) and she could just run out the clock to election day, because the media/polling/election was rigged and she knew it was hers to lose.

so by fabricating the Hillary's Health "fake news" scandal, they were able to discredit HRC critics by pointing to the HH scandal as an example of nonsense that HRC critics believe.

so was Hillary's Health a thing or not?

its hard to say. on the one hand, the supposed brain image that showed legions was stolen from an epilepsy website and professionally manipulated to look like HRC's, being leaked by a medical insider.

on the other hand, HRC camp had to respond to video of HRC collapsing getting into the van.

and then HRC's behavior when she left Chelsea's apartment, the incognito sunglasses, the weird interaction with the child, the lack of handlers...

at the time, i was convinced that the woman who emerged from Chelsea's apartment was NOT HRC, but an impostor...

and lo and behold there is a woman who makes a living being a HRC impersonator

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3684267/Hillary-Clinton-lookalike-Teresa-Barnwell-quit-job-impersonate-presidential-candidate-time.html

http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=37148

... and there just coincidentally happened to be a fake terrorist attack in Chelsea at the same time

Agreed.

Totally seem legit

I kinda think the dude fabricated all the emails...

It's a CIA operation. Like at all the "whistleblowers" on muh aliens lately. All obvious psy ops; like the CIA wouldn't immediately ice anyone who was a real whistleblower.

Votl should stick to writing open letters to provoke action. Instead of whatever this was.

He posted actual emails? I saw a pastebin with a bunch of emails. What triggered this?

Yeah and he forgot to black out the part that shows that he sent the emails to himself.

He's a fucking larper.

It could indeed be a LARP, however emailing to yourself is a semi standard practice to keep multiple recipients from getting the email addresses of other people in the thread.

That actually does not debunk any of the evidence that he spread. Emailing an email to yourself and accidentally posting that instead of the original. Can happen. I have done it. Sometimes I email something to myself so that I can find it easier. Especially when it has multiple people who are receiving the email. I look at facts and evidence. I try not to attack the messenger since that is what the CIA does to us. The label conspiracy theorist was a way to discredit people who questioned the false narrative the government was pushing on an unsuspecting and gullible population. Please don't use their tactics. Debunk the 911 evidence. Debunk the content but don't attack the messenger. It's really shady.

Claims alien ships in the sky that are cloaked by changing their vibrational frequency so that the sight sense can't see it.

Dude...what if like...clouds were actually alien spaceships monitoring Earth, but cloaked as a white or grey mist?

And every time it rains, they impregnate our world with alien DNA , which in turn grows reptilians everywhere. 200 million of them.

That's just a metaphor for how the aliens are trying to take over the human body pool. Body snatchers I tell ya. There could be some on reddit. Be careful!

Think of it as sound. And the hertz would determine what would be perceived by us. Within that range of about 95 to 500 hertz would be a physical vibration. If the intensity was too high or low it would not be in such. Yea it makes sense this could be how a craft could alter their density. But what if the beings inside? Wouldn't they have to alter as well?

They are said to do that. But I'm not sure if this is the case. Never have been able to prove that to myself.

The aliens though? What are they? Higher vibrational beings? They would have to lower it to get here...

This is so outlandish... This would make a fantastic ARG or video game. I'm not sure why these people don't put their efforts into something more ambitious like that.

Thaya a good summary. Thank you for doing it.

Catholic priests are used to smuggle guns.

I know they were running drugs during Operation Gladio. That's likely.

The Israeli art students planted bombs (something about the 91st floor) in the twin towers.

There's some evidence for this. Not art students, but operatives acting under that cover.

Dems and republicans both bend the knee to a secret group called American Council of Families

Change that to "Freemasons and bankers" and it's correct.

Putin considered white hat.

He's done nasty stuff to stay in power. But he's nothing like the US. So "white hat" for a politician.

Soros is high level cabal but there are 4 people above him that happen to be very, very old.

Soros would be roughly mid-level. The leaders of major secret societies (Freemasons, Jesuits, Knights of Malta, etc.), Pope, royal family, Rothschilds, and a few other super-rich families are definitely more powerful. But Soros isn't a slouch, either.

Almost everything else is totally unverifiable, or complete bullshit.

Need domain names, times and dates, stuff we can link to reality

I've always believed in the intentions of VOTL and I still do. I also think a lot of his info is sound. I believe he is telling his truth.

Just a feeling, but he's not always getting perfect or complete information. He is a messenger of information that is funneled down between several people first, and he can't push the action.

This situation creates two problems for him: 1) The threshold for credibility is so absurdly high, even before he conveys info about current events. Basically, he loses 70% of the conspiracy community out the gate because not everyone believes the things about aliens. Conspiracy theorists also have the tendency to not only dismiss what they don't believe, but antagonize it. So, the 70% who doesn't believe him becomes hostile... and those flames are only fanned when VOTL gets antagonistic in return. Which he does.

2) His funnel of information is prone to errors, understandably. VOTL takes a big risk in pinning any events on specific dates and times because he himself can't push the action and such events are contingent on so many moving parts over which he has no direct control. The 30% of conspiracy theorists who do believe in his message then get whittled down to maybe 10% when he can't deliver on his projections.

3) VOTL still has ego issues getting in the way of his message that are being exploited by those with nefarious intentions. He gets frustrated when others do not see as he does, and when he's misunderstood or incorrect about things like July 27 prediction, he opts to tap out. Those wishing to promulgate his message have a hard time doing so when they are not given the full story about what's going on with him personally.

At the end of the day, though, I commend him. He's doing the best he can with the situation he's in.

nice try VOTL

Oh, and one more note.

I hope we as a community discuss more about what VOTL is pushing forth, rather than falling into the trap of discussing his persona. Truth is not an all-or-nothing thing. If we believe there's misinfo in what he says, then let's discuss that piece of information. If we think there's truth, then we should go from there. Most of us know what he put forth about 911 is truth. Even if we believe he's an unwitting person prepping us for project BlueBeam, then let's point out the ways in which we are concerned we're being groomed for that.

For example, I am glad to see they're looking into Haim Saban. Based on my own research I'm 100% confident he's a part of the LA/Hollywood/UCLA MK Ultra group involved in sex trafficking. Look at the organizations Cheryl Saban is involved with and spot the red flag after red flag.

But for us to just look at VOTL and say, "he's a LARP" is as bad as discussing the hairstyles of presidential candidates rather than their actual platform (fully acknowledging my earlier post was doing exactly this).

Thanks for posting this, /u/LightBringerFlex.

The thing is the guy basically listed every major conspiracy theory besides flat earth(which would kind-of conflict with aliens) and says the Russia-Trump conspiracy is not real. This leads to almost any news on any conspiracy probably leading to validation tweets from them.

Secondly they provide no evidence in the emails, just anonymous sources(isn't that what we fight MSM about) telling him in emails.

Thirdly, even if you ignore the ONLY email that didn't have redacted email source name being from himself to himself, ALL the emails have "sent from ProtonMail". Yes, every source of his uses the same email system.

That's not his persona, those are real facets of his emails. There is no new evidence with any information about the source.

What the fuck is a "white hat"? Can people stop throwing buzzwords around like blunts, holy shit

I mostly hear "white hat" as a term for an ethical hacker or the good guy in a western who wears a white hat (the villain wears a black hat) like what you might have seen recently in the series Westworld.

I think in the context of VotL's narrative, Putin is aware of the ET situation and is against the bad ones, hence he is a white hat.

can someone please give me an "explain like i'm 5" thing on VOTL.

sorry sometimes i cannot keep up with all these things - is VOTL a person? is he/she new? what is going on?! just a short synopsis someone, pleaseeee

You lost. Want to go through each point one by one? :D

Semantic nonsense.