r/conspiracy: Government murders baby

Government murders baby

9 2017-07-29 by [deleted]

*British baby Charlie Gard, who was at the center of a legal battle that captured the world's attention, died Friday, one week before his first birthday

*Charlie was born on August 4, 2016, seemingly healthy. But two months into his short life his parents noticed his health was declining. They took him to London's Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in October where he remained at least until Thursday

*He was diagnosed with mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, a rare inherited condition that causes muscle weakness and loss of motor skills. Charlie was the 16th person to ever be diagnosed with the disease, according to his parents

As the disease progressed, Charlie became weaker, losing the ability to move his arms or legs or breathe, and he experienced seizures. *He was then placed on a ventilator that was breathing for him**

*Through their own research, Charlie's parents, Chris Gard and Connie Yates, found a doctor in the United States doing research on an experimental treatment called nucleoside bypass therapy who was willing to treat Charlie

At the end of January, Charlie's parents launched a GoFundMe page to raise money to bring Charlie to the United States for that treatment. In three months, they exceeded their £1.3 million ($1.65 million) goal to cover the costs, *but the hospital stepped in and opposed this effort, stating that it was not in the best interest of their patient

In February, the hospital decided, based on Charlie's status, that treatment was unlikely to benefit Charlie. Unable to agree, *the hospital went to court to have a judge decide, hoping to be able to remove Charlie from life support

In April, *the UK High Court ruled that it was in the infant's best interest for his treating clinicians to remove the ventilator keeping him alive. That decision was then backed by the European Court of Human Rights in June, which ruled not to intervene in the case. This was upheld by a British Supreme Court decision that the hospital could discontinue life support to Charlie and he could not be transferred to the US or elsewhere. The emotional case then went to the UK High Court last week after the hospital requested another hearing to consider "new evidence relating to potential treatment for his condition."

*That new evidence, came in part from Hirano who testified that there was an 11% to 56% chance Charlie could show clinically significant improvement if treated. Hirano came to London, evaluated Charlie and spoke with those who had been treating him and other experts. Hirano came to London, evaluated Charlie and spoke with those who had been treating him and other experts

*On Monday, Charlie's parents gave up their fight to take Charlie to the US after new brain and muscle scans revealed their son had deteriorated and was therefore less likely to benefit from the experimental treatment, while his doctors and parents battled in court. Too much time had passed.

*On Thursday, with the hospital and Charlie's parents still at an impasse, the judge's order to remove life support and move Charlie to hospice took effect

*Mummy and Daddy love you so much Charlie, we always have and we always will and we are so sorry that we couldn't save you. We had the chance but we weren't allowed to give you that chance. Sweet dreams baby. Sleep tight our beautiful little boy," Charlie's parents said in a statement after they gave up their fight.

TL;DR - nasty government wouldn't let this family get lifesaving medical treatment for their baby, orders the baby's breathing tube removed.

excerpts sourced from

80 comments

1 chornu 2017-07-29

I remember hearing about this.

There's a significant difference between 11% and 56% chance of making any sort of improvements. I don't lean heavily one way or the other on this topic because I can see both sides.