If the new world order had such sophisticated technologies to create a perfect simulation for us to reside in, then why the fuck is it taking them thousands of years to get to the point?
the earth has never been flat. this idiotic discussion has been going on for eons.. it´s always trolls who push the flat earth agenda.. so smart man have to explain (waste time and energy) to idiots that the earth is round...
because it's really humans that are good vs other beings using humans as hosts. I think the story in the christian bible is true and flat earth and the one world government are all part of it
Flat Earth model can't predict eclipses. Ball Earth model can with 100% accuracy. Ball Earth model is better and therefore we can safely discard the Flat Earth model.
Geocentrism predicted eclipses and stellar phenomena for thousands of years. The same logic can be applied. Also an Astrolabe is modelled on a flat plain with a celestial sphere.
By 20 B.C. the Chinese knew how eclipses were caused ... By 8 B.C. the Chinese could predict eclipses by using the 135 month period; and by A.D. 206 they could predict eclipses by analyzing the motion of the moon. By A.D. 390 they could predict how much of the moon would be in shadow.
If you want more than that, sorry, it was all "lost" to history. Whoops.
Right. So you can't predict any eclipses using the Flat Earth model and therefore it should be thrown out.
If your argument is that they knew this skill a long time ago, but it's "lost" to history, and now they can predict eclipses with 100% accuracy using the ball Earth method, and no one can predict eclipses currently using the flat Earth method, then that's a shitty argument.
So Earth as a ball, concave in a geocentric universe is better. Check.
Martin Gardner (Co-Founder of "debunking")
...notes that "most mathematicians believe that an inside-out universe, with properly adjusted physical laws, is empirically irrefutable".
The sole projection used for large-scale mapping in the ellipsoidal form (topographic quadrangles) of the United States by the U.S. Geological Survey until the 1950s.
Basis for Progressive Military Grid used by the U.S. Army until the 1940’s.
Projection for many early coastal charts by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey.
Origin Apparently originated about 1820 by Ferdinand Rudolph Hassler (1770-1843), first director of the Survey of the Coast (later the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey).
The ice dispersement makes much more sense on the ball Earth theory since both poles would receive less sunlight. Flat Earth with a wall of ice around the outside makes no sense, if their theory was correct then the flat Earth would get almost perfectly uniform sunlight from dick to tit.
If the earth is flat and contained in a dome, like the bible says. An alien invasion could still be real because they aren't aliens but inter-dimensional demons...
Name calling is against the rules here. This is the only warning you will receive. I suggest you read our rules as any future infractions will result in a ban.
But if the flat Earth is contained within a dome, it's safe to say the dome is actually a sphere and since the earth is contained within the invisible sphere then the sphere is actually a part of the unit we call earth and thus the earth as a whole is still a globe even if the earth within the globe is flat.
I'm a little unclear how the earth being flat means it's logically impossible for there to be an outer space or asteroids. Can you walk me through this?
good points an alien invasion could be faked to start a one world government. the whole conspiracy is so complicated on purpose so it makes people question the legitimacy.
30 comments
1 JamesColesPardon 2017-08-02
Removed. Rules 5 and 12.
1 lispychicken 2017-08-02
100% trolling. Stupid new account.
1 1-800-GOFUCKYOURSELF 2017-08-02
If the new world order had such sophisticated technologies to create a perfect simulation for us to reside in, then why the fuck is it taking them thousands of years to get to the point?
It's absolutely unnecessary.
1 downisupp 2017-08-02
the NWO happen 100 years ago.. everything changed after ww1, or as the people would call it at that time. the masons war
1 ringopendragon 2017-08-02
So the Earth wasn't flat till after WWI?
1 tatadoo 2017-08-02
No it was a triangle before WWI.
1 captain_obvioused 2017-08-02
have an upvote
1 downisupp 2017-08-02
the earth has never been flat. this idiotic discussion has been going on for eons.. it´s always trolls who push the flat earth agenda.. so smart man have to explain (waste time and energy) to idiots that the earth is round...
1 _2pac_ 2017-08-02
because it's really humans that are good vs other beings using humans as hosts. I think the story in the christian bible is true and flat earth and the one world government are all part of it
1 Sarcasticus 2017-08-02
Flat Earth model can't predict eclipses. Ball Earth model can with 100% accuracy. Ball Earth model is better and therefore we can safely discard the Flat Earth model.
1 HideFoundHide 2017-08-02
Geocentrism predicted eclipses and stellar phenomena for thousands of years. The same logic can be applied. Also an Astrolabe is modelled on a flat plain with a celestial sphere.
1 Sarcasticus 2017-08-02
Feel free to show how this model can be used to predict upcoming eclipses.
1 HideFoundHide 2017-08-02
If you want more than that, sorry, it was all "lost" to history. Whoops.
Babylonians predict solar and lunar eclipses - method "lost" to history.
Amazing how much is "lost" to history.
Eclipses were not the best example, yet it still works. Try not to delude yourself into thinking this generation was the first to look in the sky.
1 Sarcasticus 2017-08-02
Right. So you can't predict any eclipses using the Flat Earth model and therefore it should be thrown out.
If your argument is that they knew this skill a long time ago, but it's "lost" to history, and now they can predict eclipses with 100% accuracy using the ball Earth method, and no one can predict eclipses currently using the flat Earth method, then that's a shitty argument.
1 HideFoundHide 2017-08-02
Yes, lets use the model that cannot find 97% of the universe.
1 Sarcasticus 2017-08-02
And now you're just trying to avoid my point. With some asinine thing about the universe when we're talking about Earth models.
Flat Earth can't predict eclipses, ball Earth can. Ergo, ball Earth is better, flat Earth can be discarded.
1 HideFoundHide 2017-08-02
So Earth as a ball, concave in a geocentric universe is better. Check.
1738 Map accurate model of Earth - Concave Perspective
Polyconic (concave) Projection Map used 1825 to 20th Century
The sole projection used for large-scale mapping in the ellipsoidal form (topographic quadrangles) of the United States by the U.S. Geological Survey until the 1950s.
Basis for Progressive Military Grid used by the U.S. Army until the 1940’s.
Projection for many early coastal charts by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey.
Origin Apparently originated about 1820 by Ferdinand Rudolph Hassler (1770-1843), first director of the Survey of the Coast (later the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey).
1 Flytape 2017-08-02
The ice dispersement makes much more sense on the ball Earth theory since both poles would receive less sunlight. Flat Earth with a wall of ice around the outside makes no sense, if their theory was correct then the flat Earth would get almost perfectly uniform sunlight from dick to tit.
1 DarthStem 2017-08-02
So if we all become retarded we win? Sweet.
1 jaydwalk 2017-08-02
If the earth is flat and contained in a dome, like the bible says. An alien invasion could still be real because they aren't aliens but inter-dimensional demons...
1 strugglinaddict 2017-08-02
Flat earth model can record eclipses. morons
New account=false and trolling? good logic
1 Flytape 2017-08-02
Hey.
Name calling is against the rules here. This is the only warning you will receive. I suggest you read our rules as any future infractions will result in a ban.
I've removed your comment.
1 IthAConthpirathee 2017-08-02
I like how interactive the modding here is. There is usually a public statement about the reason for comment removals, etc.
1 codaclouds 2017-08-02
electric universe also offers an interesting explanation for why a meteor would never hit earth, check their stuff out.
also, gravity is fake o;
1 Flytape 2017-08-02
I don't see why flat Earth effects any of those things.
1 strugglinaddict 2017-08-02
Flat earth=dome=no outer space=no outer space or meteors
1 Flytape 2017-08-02
Meteors could be sent by God as payment in wrath.
1 strugglinaddict 2017-08-02
Ok not a bad response, but tat would be saying god wants a one world governmenr
1 Flytape 2017-08-02
But if the flat Earth is contained within a dome, it's safe to say the dome is actually a sphere and since the earth is contained within the invisible sphere then the sphere is actually a part of the unit we call earth and thus the earth as a whole is still a globe even if the earth within the globe is flat.
1 killadrix 2017-08-02
I'm a little unclear how the earth being flat means it's logically impossible for there to be an outer space or asteroids. Can you walk me through this?
1 _2pac_ 2017-08-02
good points an alien invasion could be faked to start a one world government. the whole conspiracy is so complicated on purpose so it makes people question the legitimacy.