It always creeped me out a little. Felt contrived, it obviously was contrived, but it felt like a fear based programming. As most of the episodes had life threatening choices. Abortion, teen sex, and homosexuality had a life threatening stigma attached to it. Shows like these were designed to alter our generations views on these subjects.
Part and parcel of a government education, they social engineer each generation and this is how they do it, they hardly need books anymore.
. Abortion, teen sex, and homosexuality had a life threatening stigma attached to it. Shows like these were designed to alter our generations views on these subjects.
You mean like how the episode about aids was one of the first times the issue was covered on television? Or how the newly pregnant character went on to become on of the most popular in the series' history?
I thought I heard that Bill Nye changed his stance on 2 genders. I heard there was a video of him in the 1990s saying DNA (or whatever) determines your gender.
Then recently, he changed his mind.
For the record, I've never watched or listened to him. I'm older. But I know who he is.
I watched Carl a few weeks ago in a video discuss space and evolution. He articulated his point very well.
Why is he comical? Could you elaborate? What exactly is comical about the science? Times aren't changing the way you think they are, friend. You just believe it so due to your echo chamber.
Satan , I mean Sagan, he did talk a good game for his time. As for the rest of your post you just want to argue , I don't care. We will see how things change.
Tired, have you realized NASA is full of shit yet? That helps with knowing these freaks are just good liars. Check out sagan with Steve the deceiver hawking if you want to see the two biggest space shills in one room together. That's the comical part is adding hawking.
You could never explain how is still alive or how he uses that computer but you believe every little digital sound that comes out of it because not only is it convincingly scientific , but you can't have a conversation with it. Lol so it's just dictating your beliefs to you. Lol. Dude you are washed if you believe that shit.
Iirc the computer is responsive to his eyes and the tube he breathe in. I would like to see your evidence of nasa being full of shit. I'll leave this Sagan quote for you. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Carl sagan
Don't be worried. I'm not not afraid to be on the other side. I rarely conform. So I can see how it could construed as trolling but I question everything, even accepted ideas and people. It's kinda fun and leads to some interesting conversations.
Well yea. Would you rather have a boring conversation? See, when you hold the same ideas or so long that's what starts to happen. You get bored with them. Especially when you start to realize those ideas aren't set in stone. No perception is. Especially none of the theoretical nonsense our fore runners attempted to pass of as knowledge about the cosmos.
You can download the software and use it if you have the tools. It's really cool and it's helping people across the world! There's also versions of it that read eye movement and stuff.
What the fuck are you talking about? At what point do you just say that everyone that makes it into television is a shill for our deep-state overlords? We may as well extend that to college professors, since "they" awarded them a certificate to indoctrinate thousands of people.
Ever think that maybe he was just passionate about science and wanted to educate people on it?
I stole someone else work because I can't be bothered writing all of it and to make sure I don't miss anything.
"He was responsible, working with NASA, to many significant achievements in the exploration of space, and some of our most groundbreaking discoveries regarding our Solar System, which have inspired the missions which fruits of we have just recently began to harvest.
He was the first to suggest that Venus's climate was far from being tropical but rather has a "hellish" surface temperature of 900 degrees Fahrenheit and a crushing atmosphere, based on radio emissions. NASA's Mariner expeditions confirmed this.
He has correctly deduced color variations on Mars as an indication of wind storms. Mariner 9 and Viking expeditions to Mars during the '70s confirmed this.
As a member of the Mariner 9 imaging team he helped select the landing sites for Viking 1 and Viking 2, the first successful orbiting and landing missions on the red planet.
In addition to many other aspects of these planets of which they made us aware of, both studies taught us a lot about global warming, and are relevant then ever before.
Sagan was also a member of the science teams selected by NASA for Pioneer 10 and 11, which flew by Jupiter and Saturn, and - OF COURSE - for Voyager 1 and 2, which visited Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, and took the first photographs of the solar system from beyond Pluto. Later on it would become the first man made device to leave the solar system and travel interstellar space, carrying with it the Voyager Golden Record - our "message in the bottle" to other civilizations, which Sagan partook in shaping."
He also made the show Cosmos, which is one of the reasons I'm so fascinated by space.
Nah, I have faith in scientists, satellite imagery, every nation on earth who confirm it (all of the ones with a space program) and the thousands of people involved.
You believe YouTube conspiracy theories that present falsehoods and wild claims as evidence and facts.
There was a space race. United States won. Every nation who had interests in the space race conceded this fact. Why can't you and the rest of the people in your echo chamber accept this?
I got linked through another sub. Stayed for the bat shit crazy wild theory's. It's giving me a headache though and I've been getting triggered easily due to it being 4am here and I've just finished a project I was behind on.
They really are. They claim to be "woke" but in reality they are the idiots who are asleep. He offers no evidence whatsoever to support his wild and egregious claims. As Sagan said "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
One of my favorite quotes to drop on people is by Douglas Adams
Final Proof of the Non-Existence of God
God, creating the Universe, as illustrated by the Guide.
The Final Proof of the non-Existence of God was proved by a Babel Fish.
Now, it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some have chosen to see it as the final proof of the NON-existence of God. The argument goes something like this:
"I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing."
"But," says Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves that You exist, and so therefore, by Your own arguments, You don't. QED"
"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.
What general wavelength would this be? Science that has mountains of evidence to back it up and can be demonstrated and observed before your very eyes?
What's the truth then? What's your theory? Also, if you could please elaborate on your evidence, it would be appreciated. Thanks.
Bills explaining basic climate science knowledge to tucker. Bill is answering Tuckers questions as he is presenting them.
Tucker responds with shouting at him and claiming he's not answering the question.
Bill didn't answer one question. He asked him plain and simple, how much are people actually effecting the rate of climate change. Bill dances around the questions and avoids answering them, Bills only answer is "I know the answer". Have you seen his new tv show? He tried claiming that it's scientifically PROVEN there are more then two genders. I'm all for being who you wanna be, buts that's a hell of a claim.
What the fuck has climate change got to do with the gender shit? Of course there's two genders in the human race. Scientists don't deny that. Whether or not you believe that mentally, someone might feel "non binary" is a different subject.
Again, fuck all to do with climate change.
I edited my previous comment to answer your question. But again, how does bill not knowing the exact % of the rate make him wrong? Explain that please?
Do you think 98% of climate scientists are wrong? Or somehow less smart than you? Just because Tucker screams "HAA YOU DONT KNOW THAT ANSWER HAHAH YOURE WRONG" literally means nothing. Bill was giving a basic explanation of what climate change is. It's not his fault that you don't understand it.
I didn't say that I agree nor disagree with anything that was said in that video. I'm just saying that "I know the answer to that" is not a sufficient answer to any question"
I don't owe it to you to answer to you whatsoever. Go do some snooping around.
He answered what some of the world would look like without human intervention, which was one of tuckers answers. Why is not knowing the rate % mean he's lying?
Please read up on climate change. Please.
It's real. It's terrifying. It's getting worse. For the sake of your offspring and their offspring, read on it. You don't need to understand the exact science. Just watch a video on it.
Climate change has literally caused near world extinctions millions of years ago.
I leave with this point, say the religious science deniers and the corporations who are trying to protect their interests are right, and climate change is "fake", then what is their to lose? At the very least, this has brought about innovation and growth in the renewable industry, which helps the planet in many different ways.
But say the religious science deniers and the corporations are wrong, and we're right (which evidence form 98% of world scientists claims we are), then it doesn't bare thinking about.
The question was "what percentage of the accelerated climate change is due to humans?"
Did you get that answer from Bill in that video?
Im not gonna sit here and google the countless other videos out there that discredit Bill for the sake of satisfying you. No offense but it's not worth my time..
Countless other videos hahah. You know Bills not even an actual scientist? He's just a very educated guy. He tells people time and time again to ask actual climate scientists questions he doesn't know.
But anyway, I'll accept your question.
Bill says "fine you wanna know the %? It's 100%". It's actually probably more than that, but it's difficult to answer such a silly question.
Bill O'Riley does these stupid tactics as well. Scream an obscure, hard to answer question that someone may not know and then keep shouting the same question over and over again to validate your "point".
To be honest with you I was wasted watching Joe Rogans new podcast and they got on the topic of Bill Nye being a fluke and it sent me down a rabbit hole of videos that discredit Bill, then I posted this thread. It's nothing to take that seriously.
To be honest with you I was wasted watching Joe Rogans new podcast and they got on the topic of Bill Nye being a fluke and it sent me down a rabbit hole of videos that discredit Bill, then I posted this thread. It's nothing to take that seriously.
The fact that you linked Tucker Carlson instantly nullifies your argument. This clown, who is Fox news only hope at becoming relevant again, is an idiot. He has guest on his show, asks his questions then proceeds to scream and berate the guest when they try to answer. He has no integrity or intelligence. Tucker Carlson is nothing more than a small dick bully.
Adults are able to watch something and not have it necessarily change their viewpoint. Idiot children would worry about the effect bill nye has on them and their beliefs.
What the fuck has climate change got to do with the gender shit? Of course there's two genders in the human race. Scientists don't deny that. Whether or not you believe that mentally, someone might feel "non binary" is a different subject.
Again, fuck all to do with climate change.
I edited my previous comment to answer your question. But again, how does bill not knowing the exact % of the rate make him wrong? Explain that please?
Do you think 98% of climate scientists are wrong? Or somehow less smart than you? Just because Tucker screams "HAA YOU DONT KNOW THAT ANSWER HAHAH YOURE WRONG" literally means nothing. Bill was giving a basic explanation of what climate change is. It's not his fault that you don't understand it.
92 comments
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Indeed. A generational plant.
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
Right?
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
How about this one for target audience shill. Neil Degrasse Tyson.
Have to date myself here but my generation grew up having this shown in schools. Health classes. After school specials. Remember Degrassi Jr High?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrassi_Junior_High
Neil Degrassi Tyson.
Neil was of the real life names of one of the main characters of the show 'Scooter'. Tyson was another.
1 HelperBot_ 2017-08-03
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrassi_Junior_High
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 97189
1 HideFoundHide 2017-08-03
Never linked that - good observation.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Thanks, I just happened to catch a glimpse of the newer degrassi recently and had an aha moment. The cast was just research today.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Coincidentally, Neil, or 'scooter' was one of the very few African-American cast members
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
That is a very interesting observation. Thank you for sharing.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
It always creeped me out a little. Felt contrived, it obviously was contrived, but it felt like a fear based programming. As most of the episodes had life threatening choices. Abortion, teen sex, and homosexuality had a life threatening stigma attached to it. Shows like these were designed to alter our generations views on these subjects.
Part and parcel of a government education, they social engineer each generation and this is how they do it, they hardly need books anymore.
1 shmusko01 2017-08-03
You mean like how the episode about aids was one of the first times the issue was covered on television? Or how the newly pregnant character went on to become on of the most popular in the series' history?
Sounds like we were watching a different show.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Well, in reality we are are. Everyone perceives their own reality. Do you know what fear based programming is?
1 shmusko01 2017-08-03
Covering issues about sex and drugs...in a show about teens???! Well I never!
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
Been happening since the 1930s aye... oh wait
1 citizen8 2017-08-03
please don't bring Bill Nye into it!!
1 DonnaGail 2017-08-03
I thought I heard that Bill Nye changed his stance on 2 genders. I heard there was a video of him in the 1990s saying DNA (or whatever) determines your gender.
Then recently, he changed his mind.
For the record, I've never watched or listened to him. I'm older. But I know who he is.
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
Well I don't know much as far as genders go, physically and mentally.
But you gotta throw a dog a bone once in a while.
1 DonnaGail 2017-08-03
Okay. I get it. It was 20 years ago. Lots of people change their minds on topics years later. :-)
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
True, but the man was never a "scientist". He's a civil engineer from Cornell. So why take his word on it from the get go?
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
here.
1 DonnaGail 2017-08-03
Thanks for the link.
1 HempCO719 2017-08-03
General rule of thumb: if the person is in 'famous celebrity' status, there's always sway.ALWAYS
1 mastigia 2017-08-03
I think they used him opportunistically myself, but I would not be surprised if you were right.
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
Carl Sagan was no different. All of these characters are put on stage to wow the audience.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Carl Pagan? Worshipping Baal. Everybody loved that guy and bought most of what he said.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Because.he.was.a.SCIENTIST.
Jesus fuck this sub gives me migraines.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Watch him now. It's comical. Those guys all spoke a good game for their time. But times are changing.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
No, times are not changing. Could you please elaborate?
There are many other figures that can articulate the science better than Nye. Brian Cox and Neil Tyson are my two favourites at doing it.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
I watched Carl a few weeks ago in a video discuss space and evolution. He articulated his point very well.
Why is he comical? Could you elaborate? What exactly is comical about the science? Times aren't changing the way you think they are, friend. You just believe it so due to your echo chamber.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Satan , I mean Sagan, he did talk a good game for his time. As for the rest of your post you just want to argue , I don't care. We will see how things change.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
I literally have no fucking idea what in the fuck you're talking about, my dude. Stay woke.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Tired, have you realized NASA is full of shit yet? That helps with knowing these freaks are just good liars. Check out sagan with Steve the deceiver hawking if you want to see the two biggest space shills in one room together. That's the comical part is adding hawking.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
LMFAO HAHAHAHAHAAH
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Oh dear, they got ya.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
They sure did, my dude. Thank god I have a high IQ gent like your good self to keep me woke.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to notice deception. You dont know its there, unfortunately, until you begin looking.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
In other words, you don't really have any evidence, you've just invented this theory in your brain?
I mean, Hawking is literally crippled in his entire body, but that won't fool you! You can read the deception right off of his face!
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
You could never explain how is still alive or how he uses that computer but you believe every little digital sound that comes out of it because not only is it convincingly scientific , but you can't have a conversation with it. Lol so it's just dictating your beliefs to you. Lol. Dude you are washed if you believe that shit.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA
Wow. Outstanding. Thank you.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
This is your awareness. If you want to be dumb as fuck, keep believing crippled scientist guy.
1 WonkoTheSane__ 2017-08-03
Iirc the computer is responsive to his eyes and the tube he breathe in. I would like to see your evidence of nasa being full of shit. I'll leave this Sagan quote for you. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Carl sagan
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Bleep blip bleep obey the machine help blip I am the immortal hawking blip blip black hole, compute, send bebeblip
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Are you trolling? It seems like you're trolling, but I'm worried you're not.
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Don't be worried. I'm not not afraid to be on the other side. I rarely conform. So I can see how it could construed as trolling but I question everything, even accepted ideas and people. It's kinda fun and leads to some interesting conversations.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Well, interesting is one way of putting it...
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Well yea. Would you rather have a boring conversation? See, when you hold the same ideas or so long that's what starts to happen. You get bored with them. Especially when you start to realize those ideas aren't set in stone. No perception is. Especially none of the theoretical nonsense our fore runners attempted to pass of as knowledge about the cosmos.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
https://01.org/acat
You can download the software and use it if you have the tools. It's really cool and it's helping people across the world! There's also versions of it that read eye movement and stuff.
Cool, huh?
1 Beneficial1 2017-08-03
Hehehe yea pretty cool. Should be stickied on this sub.
1 aaaaa2222 2017-08-03
No, Carl Sagan was definitely different.
If you read his books, you would realize that he was always an advocate for questioning everything.
Sagan was probably that last real popular thing that the science community produced.
1 Billy_Bob_the_Third 2017-08-03
Sagan also said that we have to have a serious look at reincarnation.
At the same time, it seems he wasn't telling the truth about the UFO-phenomenon.
1 aaaaa2222 2017-08-03
How so? Serious question. I never anything about heard this.
1 WonkoTheSane__ 2017-08-03
It's been 16 hours and no proof, I think he is full of shit. Welcome to r/conspiracy
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
If you read his books, you would realize that he was always an advocate for questioning everything.
Did he advocate questioning 'nuclear bombs'?
1 Redditor_on_LSD 2017-08-03
What the fuck are you talking about? At what point do you just say that everyone that makes it into television is a shill for our deep-state overlords? We may as well extend that to college professors, since "they" awarded them a certificate to indoctrinate thousands of people.
Ever think that maybe he was just passionate about science and wanted to educate people on it?
Not everything is a conspiracy, dude.
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
What are you talking about, friend?
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Carl Sagan was literally a scientist. A brilliant scientist at that, might I add. Please read up on the man.
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
What great science did he do? Aware me.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
I stole someone else work because I can't be bothered writing all of it and to make sure I don't miss anything.
"He was responsible, working with NASA, to many significant achievements in the exploration of space, and some of our most groundbreaking discoveries regarding our Solar System, which have inspired the missions which fruits of we have just recently began to harvest.
He was the first to suggest that Venus's climate was far from being tropical but rather has a "hellish" surface temperature of 900 degrees Fahrenheit and a crushing atmosphere, based on radio emissions. NASA's Mariner expeditions confirmed this.
He has correctly deduced color variations on Mars as an indication of wind storms. Mariner 9 and Viking expeditions to Mars during the '70s confirmed this.
As a member of the Mariner 9 imaging team he helped select the landing sites for Viking 1 and Viking 2, the first successful orbiting and landing missions on the red planet.
In addition to many other aspects of these planets of which they made us aware of, both studies taught us a lot about global warming, and are relevant then ever before.
Sagan was also a member of the science teams selected by NASA for Pioneer 10 and 11, which flew by Jupiter and Saturn, and - OF COURSE - for Voyager 1 and 2, which visited Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, and took the first photographs of the solar system from beyond Pluto. Later on it would become the first man made device to leave the solar system and travel interstellar space, carrying with it the Voyager Golden Record - our "message in the bottle" to other civilizations, which Sagan partook in shaping."
He also made the show Cosmos, which is one of the reasons I'm so fascinated by space.
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
Exploration of space? On the conspiracy sub? Is this a joke. Surely by now most people here are at least questioning the so-called 'space programs'.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Jesus fuck.
No I don't question it, bro. The evidence is pretty fucking obvious to me. Why would it not be?
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
You have faith in the moon landings. Lots of evidence on your TV screen.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Nah, I have faith in scientists, satellite imagery, every nation on earth who confirm it (all of the ones with a space program) and the thousands of people involved.
You believe YouTube conspiracy theories that present falsehoods and wild claims as evidence and facts. There was a space race. United States won. Every nation who had interests in the space race conceded this fact. Why can't you and the rest of the people in your echo chamber accept this?
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
Sounds like one hell of a movie.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Are you trolling? Please explain to me why the moon landing was fake?
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
You know you are on the conspiracy sub, yeah?
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
I got linked through another sub. Stayed for the bat shit crazy wild theory's. It's giving me a headache though and I've been getting triggered easily due to it being 4am here and I've just finished a project I was behind on.
1 DumbledoreSays 2017-08-03
If you like getting triggered, check this out. I have never known a normie who did not get triggered by that one.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Seen 9/11. Instantly turned it off. There's only so much a man can take.
1 WonkoTheSane__ 2017-08-03
Yeah, it's quite obvious he will never face reality. Just quit while you're ahead. They believe everything is a conspiracy
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Yup. This sub and others like it are eye opening.
1 WonkoTheSane__ 2017-08-03
They really are. They claim to be "woke" but in reality they are the idiots who are asleep. He offers no evidence whatsoever to support his wild and egregious claims. As Sagan said "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
That's all I wanted. Just a little bit of evidence to back up some claims, but instead of evidence, they simply doubled down on their wild claims.
Also, fuckin MIC drop with that quote my man.
1 WonkoTheSane__ 2017-08-03
They have no evidence. It's like religion. All belief, no proof
1 WonkoTheSane__ 2017-08-03
One of my favorite quotes to drop on people is by Douglas Adams
Final Proof of the Non-Existence of God
God, creating the Universe, as illustrated by the Guide.
The Final Proof of the non-Existence of God was proved by a Babel Fish.
Now, it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some have chosen to see it as the final proof of the NON-existence of God. The argument goes something like this:
"I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing."
"But," says Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves that You exist, and so therefore, by Your own arguments, You don't. QED"
"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.
1 HelperBot_ 2017-08-03
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Adams
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 97663
1 TotesMessenger 2017-08-03
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 Billy_Bob_the_Third 2017-08-03
Shill Nye the actor guy.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
What general wavelength would this be? Science that has mountains of evidence to back it up and can be demonstrated and observed before your very eyes?
What's the truth then? What's your theory? Also, if you could please elaborate on your evidence, it would be appreciated. Thanks.
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
here is one example.
I don't have time to dive into it right now. But a quick google search could show you what I'm referring to.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
So let me get this straight.
Bills explaining basic climate science knowledge to tucker. Bill is answering Tuckers questions as he is presenting them. Tucker responds with shouting at him and claiming he's not answering the question.
Please explain to me what I'm missing here?
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
Bill didn't answer one question. He asked him plain and simple, how much are people actually effecting the rate of climate change. Bill dances around the questions and avoids answering them, Bills only answer is "I know the answer". Have you seen his new tv show? He tried claiming that it's scientifically PROVEN there are more then two genders. I'm all for being who you wanna be, buts that's a hell of a claim.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
What the fuck has climate change got to do with the gender shit? Of course there's two genders in the human race. Scientists don't deny that. Whether or not you believe that mentally, someone might feel "non binary" is a different subject.
Again, fuck all to do with climate change.
I edited my previous comment to answer your question. But again, how does bill not knowing the exact % of the rate make him wrong? Explain that please? Do you think 98% of climate scientists are wrong? Or somehow less smart than you? Just because Tucker screams "HAA YOU DONT KNOW THAT ANSWER HAHAH YOURE WRONG" literally means nothing. Bill was giving a basic explanation of what climate change is. It's not his fault that you don't understand it.
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
Relax man...
I didn't say that I agree nor disagree with anything that was said in that video. I'm just saying that "I know the answer to that" is not a sufficient answer to any question"
I don't owe it to you to answer to you whatsoever. Go do some snooping around.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
He answered what some of the world would look like without human intervention, which was one of tuckers answers. Why is not knowing the rate % mean he's lying?
Please read up on climate change. Please. It's real. It's terrifying. It's getting worse. For the sake of your offspring and their offspring, read on it. You don't need to understand the exact science. Just watch a video on it.
Climate change has literally caused near world extinctions millions of years ago.
I leave with this point, say the religious science deniers and the corporations who are trying to protect their interests are right, and climate change is "fake", then what is their to lose? At the very least, this has brought about innovation and growth in the renewable industry, which helps the planet in many different ways.
But say the religious science deniers and the corporations are wrong, and we're right (which evidence form 98% of world scientists claims we are), then it doesn't bare thinking about.
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
Dude when did I say I didn't believe in climate change?
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Then what the fuck was the point in showing me some shit video that doesn't prove your point at all?
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
The question was "what percentage of the accelerated climate change is due to humans?"
Did you get that answer from Bill in that video?
Im not gonna sit here and google the countless other videos out there that discredit Bill for the sake of satisfying you. No offense but it's not worth my time..
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Countless other videos hahah. You know Bills not even an actual scientist? He's just a very educated guy. He tells people time and time again to ask actual climate scientists questions he doesn't know.
But anyway, I'll accept your question.
Bill says "fine you wanna know the %? It's 100%". It's actually probably more than that, but it's difficult to answer such a silly question.
Bill O'Riley does these stupid tactics as well. Scream an obscure, hard to answer question that someone may not know and then keep shouting the same question over and over again to validate your "point".
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
I hear you man.
To be honest with you I was wasted watching Joe Rogans new podcast and they got on the topic of Bill Nye being a fluke and it sent me down a rabbit hole of videos that discredit Bill, then I posted this thread. It's nothing to take that seriously.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Ah, the Ed Bravo ep by any chance?
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
Nawh it was Ben Shapiro.
1 airnlight_timenspace 2017-08-03
I hear you man.
To be honest with you I was wasted watching Joe Rogans new podcast and they got on the topic of Bill Nye being a fluke and it sent me down a rabbit hole of videos that discredit Bill, then I posted this thread. It's nothing to take that seriously.
1 WonkoTheSane__ 2017-08-03
The fact that you linked Tucker Carlson instantly nullifies your argument. This clown, who is Fox news only hope at becoming relevant again, is an idiot. He has guest on his show, asks his questions then proceeds to scream and berate the guest when they try to answer. He has no integrity or intelligence. Tucker Carlson is nothing more than a small dick bully.
1 NahDude_Nah 2017-08-03
Adults are able to watch something and not have it necessarily change their viewpoint. Idiot children would worry about the effect bill nye has on them and their beliefs.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
What the fuck has climate change got to do with the gender shit? Of course there's two genders in the human race. Scientists don't deny that. Whether or not you believe that mentally, someone might feel "non binary" is a different subject.
Again, fuck all to do with climate change.
I edited my previous comment to answer your question. But again, how does bill not knowing the exact % of the rate make him wrong? Explain that please? Do you think 98% of climate scientists are wrong? Or somehow less smart than you? Just because Tucker screams "HAA YOU DONT KNOW THAT ANSWER HAHAH YOURE WRONG" literally means nothing. Bill was giving a basic explanation of what climate change is. It's not his fault that you don't understand it.
1 JayBroon1 2017-08-03
Then what the fuck was the point in showing me some shit video that doesn't prove your point at all?