40 upvotes and an url... cyber reparations are virtually free of cost.

Did you get different results than I?

I got all lovey dovey couple pictures and positive links of "black/white couples we love" type of stuff.

My white couples we mostly biracial couples... but my black couples were all black men with lighterskinned black women.

Interesting.

If you think about it for a minute...

White is the default in the West, so we describe a picture of a white couple simply as a "picture of a couple".

Mixed couples come up on google image searches for "white couple" pick up the end of "black and white couple"

If you don't

This is incontravertable proof that google is a "propaganda machine".

I mean, if they were doing this on purpose, what is it supposed to achieve?

Same

ok, i did now what

I guess I'm not the intended audience. Who is?

You can tell who the outsider is...they ask bleed obvious questions like "why would the elite do elite things and keep people down?" GEEZZZZ I WONDER HMMMM DAHHH

Care to rephrase that in non-retard?

what did the elite do in this regard? what? do you even have a clue yourself, what youre talking about? I seriously doubt that.

Holy shit they don't like this post.

whos microscope?

Oooorr... the post is dumb.

the post is retarded. op still havent said what is supposedly wrong with the results.

whos they ?

LOL, some of the photo's link back to reddit with similar posts to this one

And here are the image results if you google "couple": https://www.google.com/search?q=couple&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS719US723&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiKktHJ8dnVAhVmwYMKHXoxCokQ_AUICigB&biw=735&bih=573

The problem is that for the majority of the time, if you are talking about a white couple people don't specify their race. They are only likely to in the case that there is a different race in the mix, otherwise you don't have to specify.

Didn't you know that Caucasians have been a minority on this globe since the beginning of recorded history and now the man is trying to eradicate the white male? The white male is losing the breeding race. The only way they will ever win is if they can stop google from showing happy biracial couples! It shows their women that they can literally have viable offspring with any color of human. This is a dang'ol travesty I tell ya!

I know right? What exactly is this supposed to prove?

It proves that the_donald still thinks it can use this subreddit as it's alternate soapbox. They try but the last couple months have proved that reason prevails during USA daylight hours while their message tends to gain more traction during eastern-european and russian business hours. Imagine that!

i dont get it. i googled it and get perfectly normal and expected results. what is it that we are supposed to see here? OP I hope you realise that based on our previous searches, our cookies, or location, etc etc we all will get variyng results. So would you mind, again; actually telling is what it is we are supposed to see here.

Can you send a screen shot of your results?

what screenshot do you want? of which "google"?

The results page of the search you did.

sigh. i ask again. of which searh do you want? op asked us to do 6 different searches. which one do you want.

Oh, whichever. 'White couple', I guess.

https://postimg.org/image/6pvt8plr9/

I can see the issue with white couple and black couple because white couples are being normalised with race mixing for some reason and showing more interacial couples than what i searched for but the other 2 searches are completely normal lol

You say it as if race mixing is an issue.

It's not.

Search for Caucasian couple and you don't have this problem

OP did you do this on your normal browser?

you know google search results are different for different browser histories and such?

No they aren't

Yes, they demonstrably, provably are.

Google makes that clear, too. Search results are catered to you, your system, your location, your search history, and other factors. You and I can Google the exact same series of phrases and we'll have differences in our results, some minor, some major.

You don't need to take my word that this is a fact - and it IS a fact - you can test it yourself.

If you are logged into a Google product, that is true. Anyone can test it themselves. Try a searched while logged in and the same search while logged out, the results should be different.

When I google "happy white American couple" 95% of the couples are black.

Tried on multiple browsers and machines. Someone made a list of all of these last night. It is insane.

That's because the keyword on most of those photos have the word white in it because they are in a white backdrop or they are wearing white clothes

And also because "white" is still seen as the default setting for people in the United States, so it doesn't need to be included or clarified in searches. When you Google "happy couple," it's almost nothing but white couples. Add the "white" and you've injected race as a factor, which is why you start to get a bunch of interracial couples. Now you're seeing couples for whom race is a factor.

You can try the same thing with "happy couple" and "happy straight couple." The former, you get a bunch of standard couple shots. The latter, and suddenly gay couples start appearing in the mix. Same reason why. Because you've added sexual orientation to the mix.

Posts like this actually work against the complaint being stated or implied, because what these searches really do is showcase how we take for granted that straight and white is treated as the default setting. When you don't factor in race or sexual orientation, you get people that reflect that default setting. When you do add search terms that specify race or orientation, surprise, the results get more diverse.

It's a silly observation and a silly complaint rooted in ignorance about how search engines work and other types of ignorance.

Nice buddy I'm sure google can't decipher between the two and give accurate results on a search since "white is default"

I mentioned it was a long list. Search "American inventors" there's maybe 3 white people on the first page. I'd love your SEO analysis on this one.

I mean, the reason for the inventors search is pretty easy to understand and not dissimilar to the others. If I thought you were sincere in your interest I'd explain it to you, but since you're not there doesn't seem much point to it.

Have a nice day.

In other words you actually don't have an explanation. It is not "similar" to your previous explanation in which you said white people are the standard response so when you throw in race or sexual orientation it changes results. "American inventor" has no such attributes which is why you did not explain.

it is similar. "american" is part of the term "african american." just type "inventor" and see what you get.

It seems you don't work in IT or haven't worked with developers before. One of the largest companies in the world with literally the best engineers and you think they can't code their SE to return accurate results that differ between the phrase "African American" and "American"?

Their job is to literally sit around and make sure results are as accurate as possible.

Ah, so the reasonable answer is that Google is trying to trick people into thinking that black couples are actually white couples? or restrict people's access to pictures of white people? ok.

Google which is beyond liberal, works with the CIA and has been censoring internet content at an unprecedented rate may have something in their code that makes sure certain types of people show up.

You can say it's far fetched but I can say the same thing about the fact that you really think one of the most advanced tech companies can't provide accurate results on an extremely basic search.

I don't think they coded something specifically for this search. I think it's a flaw that shows how they specify their content in general. Cheers.

Nice and the words "american inventor"? For some reason it looks like 80% are black.

Also search American inventors.

Omg Google is trying to make us all black!

What if I said I was proud to be white? I'm labelled racist. If i am black though and celebrate being black, that is okay and everyone is supposed to encourage me to do so. That is wrong. That is the agenda. Multiculturalism is basically the Trojan horse. You HAVE TO accept something I said, or else you are the enemy. No...i just dont want to be erased from "culture" and labelled something I am not.

sigh. white pride people are intentionally dense.

4chan manipulates these image searches on purpose to fan the flame of something to be outraged about. Everyone on reddit is aware that this is easy to do. During the election, the_donald was constantly massively upvoting pictures of Hillary so it would come up first when you searched "racist." They did the same thing with pictures of Bill when you search the word "rapist."

I don't think 4chan has that power despite being a hacker.

It doesn't take any power. You just get enough people to click on something.

That's how advertising works

How does this suggest a conspiracy?

I did have a laugh of the pick with Hillary and tTrump at his wedding. Thanks OP

" It appears to confirm Corley's side of the story, showing officers putting her in handcuffs, tossing her to the ground, removing her pants, and spending several long minutes searching her body."

http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Lawyer-for-woman-suing-Harris-County-over-2015-11817477.php

America is already dead, enjoy the new United States Emirates.

It's very suspicious.

You can tell who the outsider is...they ask bleed obvious questions like "why would the elite do elite things and keep people down?" GEEZZZZ I WONDER HMMMM DAHHH

https://postimg.org/image/6pvt8plr9/

Google which is beyond liberal, works with the CIA and has been censoring internet content at an unprecedented rate may have something in their code that makes sure certain types of people show up.

You can say it's far fetched but I can say the same thing about the fact that you really think one of the most advanced tech companies can't provide accurate results on an extremely basic search.

I don't think they coded something specifically for this search. I think it's a flaw that shows how they specify their content in general. Cheers.