Sure it violates a ToS, nobody wants to be the company that does business with the KKK or nazis.

Yep, monopoly services denying service to people based on their thoughts and people are applauding it like idiots

hurr durr "Just use another service!"

which service is a monopoly?

Banking transfers like PayPal are pretty much in large parts of the world.

which large areas of the world are paypal the only means to transfer money?

Im finding it hard to believe, and the generalization of your statement doesnt lend to its credibility.

In context of online money transfer you can hardly avoid PayPal in some parts of the world.

What parts? You keep saying that without actually saying where.

Most online payments to US companies I have to use Paypal or credit cards. I'm not really sure what other services you have in mind here? Applepay/Googlewallets? EBay only goes through PayPal, CC or private bank transfers afaik.

Nationally I can use a quick online bank transfer system similar to PayPal in its simplicity.

I consider the termination of PayPal access a direct attack on somebody's economical existence.

I disagree, you dont need paypal to survive, especially in the US. It is certainly not a monopoly.

I still hold up to their rights of denying service to who they want as long as it is not a protected class.

If somebody's income stream is going through PayPal it is a matter of economical survival.

thats their choice though, not a monopoly. they have access to banks and numerous other ways to transfer money.

There's no greater sin than "intolerance" in the New World Order. It's easy for people to defend this because "Nazis! OMG!' but it won't stop with what 'other" people believe.

Out of all the aspects for distaste of the New World Order, being against genocide is not what I would pick.

This is exactly what i'm talking about. sounds reasonable.. especially with the dramatized buzzwords like 'genocide". it won't sound as reasonable when it's what you believe in

Eh I was never into the whole holocaust denial thing, but taking your statement that the Holocaust is a believe I can see your point.

"but taking your statement that the Holocaust is a believe"

i don't know what you're trying to say here or what being into holocaust denial has to do with anything i said, exactly.

it won't sound as reasonable when it's what you believe in

Did I misunderstand your attribution of the Holocaust genocide as a believe? I see it more as a historical happening, which distaste of by the New World Order should not be condemned. I'm confused how condemning past actions coincides with believes.

Holocaust denial is a belief. There are lots of those out there. Some right, some wrong. We have a right to them. I say it's dead wrong to believe in the benevolence of a New World Order.

It's illegal for the government to do it, not private companies.

Tell that to the baker who refused to make a gay cake

There are legally defined protected classes when it comes to discrimination. It's basically, religions, minorities, age, and sexual orientation. White sumpremicists aren't a protected class in anti-discrimination legislation for some reason.

That is incorrect, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not list sexual orientation as protected. It's mostly down to the states, for instance Mississippi has a law that allows refusal of service based on sexual orientation and it has been upheld by federal courts. A baker in some states can indeed refuse to make the cake.

Oh, my bad. Thanks for the correction.

Those are all different categories, with different rules. Typically a business can refuse service for any reason, except that some reasons are prohibited. Race is the big one, gender is allowable sometimes, sexual orientation is allowable in some places, etc.

It's not an area of law I've ever practiced, so grain of salt, but I don't think there are any ideology restrictions.

No, and probably no.

I'm worried that some business, like CloudFlare, have so much market power and are so critical to the modern media market that they're essentially even more a public good than "common carriers," like railroads used to be. In that case I'd want their ability to discriminate restricted.

But I don't know enough about the tech or business to know if that's the case.

In other words, the power company shouldn't discriminate on viewpoint, even if it's private. Newspapers should. I don't know which end of the spectrum we're at here, but I suspect the latter.

I agree with the principal, but I don't think Apple Pay rises to that level. It's got too much competition.

nazis and white supremacists are not a protected class.

Gender, race and sexuality are not ideologies.

Are you sure about that these days?:-)

The legislature and in some cases courts.

Gender, race, age, sexuality are all protected classes.

This why we can't get rid of cash and banks. The digital world seems scary as hell

They're a private company so they can do whatever they want. If you don't like it, don't pay for their service. I don't understand why you're so fucking stupid, can you explain that to me?

I'm against the first one to discriminate. How is that so hard to understand? Discriminating against those that discriminate.

They are refusing to aid someone commuting a wrong. Inaction would be morally worse.

If a company decided to not sell things to atheists or christians, how would that make you feel?

They'd be violating the Civil Rights Act.

If they were banning Isis would you feel the same?

Okay but no one is stopping them from saying anything? They're just removing their content from their service?

So who exactly is stopping freedom of speech? If I give you a platform to speak on and I decide I don't want to support your speech anymore so I take my platform.

How is that stopping you from finding another platform.

So it Isis had a gofundme and private discord how would you feel?

I'm against the first one to discriminate. How is that so hard to understand? Discriminating against those that discriminate.

I agree with the principal, but I don't think Apple Pay rises to that level. It's got too much competition.

What parts? You keep saying that without actually saying where.

If a company decided to not sell things to atheists or christians, how would that make you feel?

They'd be violating the Civil Rights Act.