That article is incorrect. clientHold wouldn't prevent transfer of a domain, it just means there's no DNS resolution.

That's what the EPP code means. I used to do domains & hosting for a living when I was younger so I know how it should work.

It's possible that there's something more going on but just clientHold isn't proof of this. You'd expect to see clientTransferProhibited.

Bear in mind that they lied about "Jewish hackers" taking down the site, so they could be leaving it there to make it look like Google are holding it whilst they find someone who will do business with them.

Of course there's a difference.

clientHold means the domain cannot be resolved so it's non-functional. The registrar doesn't want to provide them with service.

clientTransferProhibited and you can't transfer it to someone who will provide service, the domain isn't behind held by the registrar.

Which still means the domain wouldn't work...

god that article seems like it was written after a bucket of margaritas

nonetheless, my typical argument of they're a private company they can choose not to do business with anyone breaks down here. unless google has some really shitty TOS that grants this power, this should be huge.

thanks for raising

My friend googled an obscure space-nazi and his phone wanted to know his location— Immediately.

We both thought it was weird enough to go:

"That's funny?"

What's a space-nazi?

And how obscure do you have to be to be a particularly obscure space-Nazi?

Nazis associated with the rocket program, not the ones currently on the moon.

Which search term? I'd like to try it.

I realize this is up for debate

Ummm, no it's not.

Yeah it is, that dude was a diagnosed schizophrenic psychopath.

Sounds like a perfect pawn for the FBI/CIA

A lot of evidence says he wasn't.

A lot of evidence, eh? Anything other than an Alex Jones rant?

And not mock/insult/be snarky towards those who do ask questions.

Don't reply to trolls

This is the first historical instance of large-scale corporate censorship (over many platforms) without any US court ordering a shut down. This is unprecedented and should make for an interesting case if it gets that far (and arguably if not as well).

Isn't DailyStormer back online on Tor? They're going to have to shut down the whole net to prevent free speech.

Because there are so few actual white nationalists?

TOR is the online hub for Child Pornography and Narco Trafficking, and yet even though they don't ever care to disavow those awful things, they actively disavowed any White Nationalist who might use their service. This world is going insane

Yeah I see it too, basically it does seem to me that governments, corporations, and various think tanks are coming up with the strategy to limit the flow of information that is going around and are doing so by infiltrating groups wishing to speak on issues and then hijacking that group so that any valid concerns are washed away in a sea of vitriolic rhetoric and nonsense. It should be noted this isn't a "left" vs "right" thing either.

The Anti-Fascist group most likely has been corrupted and taken over by neoliberal groups and government and corporate think tanks to align people who wish to fight fascism with people who loot and destroy and incite violence everywhere they go and most likely BLM has also be destroyed and taken over. I'd also imagine that the Free Speech group on the Right has been corrupted and taken over just like the Tea Party before it. It's now being lumped in as some Far Right group like the Nazis which point blank I don't believe is the case.

It seems to me that this is how the TPTSB (Shouldn't Be) are going to destroy the people rights to protest about how they feel, destroy the people's rights to say what they feel is wrong and most importantly destroy the Internet and thus limit what informs they deem is to "offensive" to others or to be more precise, information that shines a light on phony "left" vs "right" paradigm and expose the bullshit on all sides. While I dislike the white nationalist and white supremacist of the Christian and Alt Right, they have a right to say what they feel just as I have the right to call them out on their bullshit. Rather then arguing and using buzzwords, or skewed statistics that bunk as fuck and cherry picked to show a certain narrative, I point to history as my weapon and show what I feel is wrong with what they are saying if I feel something isn't right.

I'd urge any fellow advocates of Multiculturalism or Social Justice to do the same. Don't cry out and act violent, state facts and historical points to showcase if something is amiss, and if you cannot find anything good, hear your opponent out and consider their criticism. Maybe you might find a bridge to walk on.

Here's the thing.

These people (elite globalists) are already controlling the money, the labor, the power, the humans, the information.

Nothing is going to deter them from this quest to have NWO.

Everyone is going to get a set of thinking/speaking rules, a vaccination and a chip.

All the countries (regions) will belong to IMF and World Bank.

It won't matter who runs the world - you can be sure it won't be us.

So, go ahead and make a clever sign.

Bring some earplugs, a foil suit and a gas mask...You'll need it.

I thought people owned domain names not rented them. I can't see how one company, just because they think they are the internet can just come along and seize some domain name owned by another business.

and since when was it ok for another business to render something unusable that belongs to another business.

Daily S will probably sue the Goolag's ass.

Giphy used to have some funny hitlers (like Hitler sledding down a hill). They took them all off now.

Guess we can't watch Blazing Saddles anymore, huh? (Funny Hitler scene in that too). Sad.

We must collect books, buy them, borrow them but sooner or later they may be our main source of information. Think about it, if it were to shift, it would be very quick.

This is why monopolies are dangerous to everybody. It is much easier to control information (look at the news media) and other large-scale companies that people rely on for information (Google / YouTube, Facebook) when the competition is either dead or bought out. The amount of information stored by Google is staggering, and they have full access to all of it, can delete what they want, change what they want, etc. Amazon is on that boat too now.

I know that everybody loves the argument "it is a private entity, they can do what they want" but what we are seeing here is why there needs to be SOME sort of safeguard for us, the consumers, as well. Companies should not have the same rights as citizens, and I think the court ruling of Buckley vs Valeo was a mistake. When it comes to information, i think that private entities need to be held to some level of regulation not unlike how food companies have to meet regulation standards. The first amendment needs to be protected, and i think the scope of it should extend beyond what was initially set back when it was made by our founding fathers. Disinformation campaigns committed by corporations should probably be illegal because of the sheer influence it has on the population.

Sorry for this being a rant, but i felt the need to throw this out there. I also welcome debate for/against this as well. Obviously there is no precedent for this, but it makes sense that laws in respect to this should favor the individual over the company, not the other way around. Companies having this much influence on us is a globalist's wet dream.