Fucking libs. No matter how many Islamic terrorist attacks, they say we can't define a group by actions of a few. But then one white man, one incident, on one day, and they want to ascribe it to all Trump supporters, and burn this country down. WTF?

0  2017-08-20 by [deleted]

[removed]

34 comments

Far right groups have engaged in about twice as many plots and attacks as Islamist groups in America. I'd say there's reason to be concerned.

https://apps.revealnews.org/homegrown-terror/

If you don't want the left calling the right Nazis, maybe don't have people flying swastikas and committing acts of terrorism at your rallies.

Trump did hundreds of rallies running for president, and not one Nazi showed up. The only "nazis" that showed up were the thugs hired by Hillary Clinton's team to show up and antagonize peaceful people and create violence to try to discredit trump. Hillary and her supporters are just as bad as Nazis.

Are you sure about that? I bet they were there but were afraid to fly their colors. That's really the point of all if this - now that Trump is in office and gives subtle support through omissions and innuendos they are emboldened to come out of the basements and raise their standard.

Specifically calling out the KKK and white supremacists = omissions and innuendos? What a joke, completely ignoring a man's words so you can push a narrative.

You know that's bs. He pandered under threat of internal revolt. He all but had a knife in his back. His true colors are displayed when he is speaking off script.

I went to an event in Washington DC on 9/11/13 that was organized by a Muslim 9/11 truther guy. We had maybe 50 to 100 people max. Honestly, there were more police there to protect us.

I took a walk to get to it that was much longer than it needed to be but also winded it's way through the thousands of bikers who came to protest the event I was coming to attend. I even had pleasant conversations with a few of them. At the march that followed the speeches the diehard nastiest protesters who encircled us far out numbered our pro 9/11 truth marchers. What a ceremony.

You might recall video of Matthew Weimbach (a neo-nazi who happens to have a literal neckbeard) shoving around a black woman protesting at a Trump rally. Guarantee he was not the lone Nazi to appear at such things. This doesn't reflect poorly upon Trump supporters or conservatives in my view, but is proof that neo-nazis have actively been infiltrating the Trump movement-- which you deny for some reason, indirectly aiding their efforts instead of kicking them to the curb.

Team red yay and team blue boo... Your "this or that" ideas are as bad as the media narrative. I agree that it's ignorant to ascribe an agreed upon set of beliefs and wants to a large group of people based on the actions or beliefs of a small group of idiots. You did a great job of doing this by saying "libs" all do something. All you've done with your confused comment is make it appear you're upset that some people don't label large diverse groups with the behaviors of the most extreme contingent of that group.

I get upset at anybody killing in the country, its just that white supremacists are running around destroying things in the wide-open and they don't deserve the liberty they are given. Learn to not be a fucking cunt. Live and let live. Love your fellow man. Stop being a fucking cunt.

white supremacists are running around destroying things in the wide-open

antifa does the same

You are an absolute joke. antifa destroys in the wide-open, your "ebil white supwemacists" gather and speak. Learn not to be a lying cunt.

These gasslighting accounts, just completely twisting the facts 180 degrees, these are the accounts of fascists.

Bold faced lies when the facts ate clear for all the world to see. Outrageously hyperbolic claims, grouping opposing dissenters together no matter their own differing views, labeling the "others" to dehumanize them, never admit to reality, constantly push a fantasy.

You are sick in the head.

It makes me annoyed, because the media is fueling divisions by refusing to report or discuss anything with any depth or complexity. Personally when I saw the Charlottesville crash photos, my first response was that it was caused by fear or panic, because I tend to attribute things to human failings before deciding on murder. The trial may find it was certainly murder, but I assumed it was normal to hold off on judgement at least until a trial. But now, I either need to condemn the driver automatically, or risk being painted as a Nazi sympathizer, which frankly is absurd to the point of being laughable.

It's easy to be swept away when the forums for debate are manipulated, but I take comfort in the fact there there are millions of democrats across America who find the msm behavior and trial by media to be as alarming as I do.

It is clear and obvious war mongering. I keep wondering why more people are not accusing them of a war crime. I think what they are doing is a very clear international war crime and they need to be called out on it.

First step, don't watch. Second step complain about it. We need to build public support for the idea that what they are doing is a very clear war crime. Don't ask how they are getting away with it, that is obvious. The more important thing to point out is that it is fully illegal under international law.

They obviously think they will never be indicted and sent to the Hague, maybe they need to be reminded that it is a lot more politically possible than they think it is. Those people are living in a glass house bubble. We can do a lot of damage to them by just throwing a few stones. They are being well paid to lie us into more wars. They know what they are doing.

I just "argued" with someone on here yesterday on why the "black" in "Black Lives Matter" is based upon skin-color; which is the same reason as the "white" in "White Supremacy"...

Before my response gets arguments, here's a multiple choice question:

The "white" in "white supremacy" and the "black" in "Black Lives Matter" refer to?: a)skin-color b)eye-color c)hair-color d)blood-color

As a political organizer with a very long track record of real honest to God success with encouraging groups to form for political action [Tea Party, Occupy, IdleNoMore, + others] I was very happy to see the BlackLivesMatter group self organize. It felt like a big success to me in my intended public education program. They were 'getting it', I was thrilled.

What really surprised me was the angry and racist response to BLM, ESPECIALLY from the police. The anti-black prejudice expressed by the BlueLivesMatter group really shocked me. What race is blue? Aliens? Well, I guess I'd have to say it must be the self chosen color of dominance, authority and supremacy. It is the "Blue Man" referred to in the Native American religious prophesy story in "Black Elk Speaks."

Black Elk had a vision of a woman who leads the people in a great struggle to defeat the Blue Man, which I think is the idea of fascist military supremacy. It is a very serious problem. It is killing our planet.

Who would have thought the big solutions could be discovered by researching Native American religion? That was totally unexpected.

Interesting observation. Did you also discuss the contrast between the assertions of supremacy versus lives matter?

If you take out the color part of it, then it becomes a universal question of banking policy, economic destruction, ecological destruction, slavery, sex dominance, poisoning the water, poisoning the air, child rape, mass murder, Gaza, etc. War in general. Is there supremacy or do lives matter?

It is amazing how so many issues can be boiled down to that one question. Is there supremacy or do lives matter?

Shall we ask our overlords what they will decide?

I tried to, however that notion failed. To be clear, I believe all lives matter (all, meaning everyone (even police lives - yes, police can be corrupt, but so can everyone)).

I specifically stated that all lives matter, because I believe all lives matter, and if "Black Lives Matter" wanted to fight for everyone/all, they should use "All Lives Matter" (or "Everyone Matters"), but apparently that makes me the racist.

It wasn't worth arguing about, as that poster was putting words in my mouth (saying that I'm saying "All Lives Matter out of spite", which I didn't say nor imply, heh), throwing out insults/name-calling, wouldn't answer simple questions, and falsely accusing.

Shall we ask our overlords what they will decide? My overlord is Jesus Christ, and He accepts all who believe in him - all, not just a few. And He will rule soon.

God/Jesus bless you or best to you, whichever you prefer.

I thought all lives matter was a terrific development. I was surprised to see how anyone could argue that it was racist. I sure didn't see it. Exactly which group did they say it excluded? I bet they didn't have any real arguments, just name calling, lies and putdowns.

Regarding asking our overlords, I can't think of a better one than Jesus. I was actually making a joke, but your response was terrific. He sure would be a big improvement over the folks I was thinking of.

Lmfao...

That is a shit tier talking point.

No where does black lives matter implies other "lives" don't matter. It's a fucking rallying cry against police abuse on black Americans. Clearly black lives don't matter because you would rather stroke your ego arguing all lives matter than to actually change something.

So tell me how black lives matter is racist.

People like you are to stuck on the "black" part to realize black lives matter is carrying you on their fucking backs. Who else is protesting police brutality???

Why was all lives only muttered after blacks rallied behind black lives matter after being shown that black lives clearly don't matter???

Why does all lives and blue lives matter go hand in hand???

What is a "police life" police is a job not a life. Therefore it's stupid to say all lives matter then say even police????

I think you should reread the comments you are replying to. Your reading comprehension seems to be seriously missing.

I also think you owe an apology to the above poster for completely misunderstanding them and reacting emotionally to something they never said.

You know your high horse mentality is kinda cheesy...

Especially considering I'm the person he was referencing.

Nuh-uh, blacks totally can't be racist. Only white people putting their skin color in a name is racist. Only when white people point to skin color is it racist, even if they're only pointing out the #fact that sjw's use race as a weapon.

Oh cool another fuckin post complaining about liberals. Some of you dudes think this place is just a conservative sub where you can vent to each other about yoir feelings. It's not.

Yeah, I think there is a conservative sub, (with North Korea like support of their dear leader) that they can vent to, in a nice echo chamber too.

I know, right. I've been subbed to /r/conspiracy for years, but all these posts and comments that act like this sub is a safe space to spout conservative ideology and complain about lefties and liberals have caused me to unsubscribe. In less than a year it's changed from a sub where we discussed and debated all types of conspiracies, to now being some weird political sub where people defend racists and think the President gives 2 shit about the American people.

Each different president sits at the helm of an army of online trolls who work in the CIA, FBI and in the military. That is a growth industry. The CIA especially likes to shape public opinion, this is one of their methods.

Your tax dollars are also paying for this. Imagine what it would be like if Hillary was our leader and they were doing her bidding. At least Trump is disorganized.

There are people who are obviously trying to push an agenda.

I think at least some of them are straight up Russians. Their efforts to help Trump didn't stop when he was elected. They still have unmet goals.

Lmao. Stiiill beating that dead horse...

But her emails...

But fuck the laws that she broke right? Screw the fact that the FBI director described her crimes, in some detail, on national TV and then said "buuut she didn't mean to do it so get out of jail free card." Right?

Yeah, who gives a shit about national security laws that were blatantly violated by the SoS. Who gives a shit that after getting a congressional subpoena she absolutely demolished any trace of the worst of the evidence. "Oooh those? Those were just wedding and yoga emails, silly. Wipe? Like with a cloth?"

But her emails... blow me.

Are you an FBI agent?

I'm guessing no...

Yes she was careless and incompetent but according to the law she did not do anything wrong.

Trump talks about rule of law. I bet he wracks up more charges than John Gotti. Let's see how he feels about laws when his secrets are brought to light.

Here's a preview of what Mueller has been doing.

The Dubious Friends of Donald Trump

Only whites have a history of attempting to exterminate other races.

lol even if whites had actually done this which they did not it still wouldn't be true. Anti-white virtue signaling is so pathetic.

Hitler, U.S. whites against native Americans, Argentine whites against native Americans, South African whites testing of biological agents to exterminate black Africans etc.

Each different president sits at the helm of an army of online trolls who work in the CIA, FBI and in the military. That is a growth industry. The CIA especially likes to shape public opinion, this is one of their methods.

Your tax dollars are also paying for this. Imagine what it would be like if Hillary was our leader and they were doing her bidding. At least Trump is disorganized.