Nuclear Weapons (CERN)

0  2017-08-21 by AhuwahZeus

Particle accelerators are nuclear weapons increasing gravity or magnetic pressure in the atmosphere. This is similar to the concept of taking a positively charged magnet and a negatively charged magnet and then binding them together in place to create a condensed force in the middle while using nuclear power to fuel the magnetic charges. They are using the particle accelerators to increase gravitational pressure in the lower atmosphere. The word gravity derives from the Latin word "gravis" which means weight or heavy. An increase in gravity speeds up the rate of time and the ware on matter. Gravity also has effects on time known as gravitational time dilation. The more you ware on something the faster it will break down. Matter is subject to decay and therefore is subject to time. Through HAARP they can ionize parts of the atmosphere and move around the magnetism released from the particle accelerators through what is called the vector or magnetic moment and target specific locations or regions used for oppressing individuals and society.

27 comments

An increase in gravity speeds up the rate of time and the ware on matter.

That's wrong. it is exactly the other way around.
The further down you are in a gravity well, the slower time moves.

If you apply more pressure onto something you will ware it down faster. Matter is subject to time and decay. If matter is worn down faster than does it have more time or less time?

If you increase pressure on the Earth does that make the sun set slower?

Pressure doesn't affect time dilation. You can easily test this by getting two waterproof watches. Set them to identical times, then throw one watch at the bottom of a pool. Come back in some time and they will be the exact same.

Gravity is magnetic pressure. Physicists related gravity with electromagnetism but do not define it as pressure and yet the word gravity derives from an older word gravis which means weight or heavy. Modern physicists are not being completely honest here.

If you want to test whether magnetic fields affect time dilation, that is easily tested as well. Take two watches set at the same time. Place one at an empty space on your lawn, take another and place it by electricity lines such as your fuse box or cars engine. Then take the reading at some later moment.

Literally anyone can do this experiment but you won't find any time difference.

Ultimately what my point is that gravity is a form of pressure and increase in pressure wares more on something. The perception of time may be slowed under an increase in pressure but actual time is a constant however the decay is increased.

You're talking about biology then, not physics. Gravity in physics is very interesting once you really get into it. You've got the Higgs Field which gives mass to force carriers such as the weak force, breaking electroweak symetry. Meanwhile while other particles get some mass from the Higgs Field too, much of it comes from Gluon Yukawa interaction between Quarks.

I am talking about gravity which is physics. I am talking about the effect gravity has on biology or matter in general. Now what you are adding on has nothing to do with the subject of the post. This is called subversion.

No subversion, was just tempting you to read up on how gravity comes about.

Gravity is magnetic pressure or weight manifested from composition of matter, charge, density, and mass. All matter is magnetic to various degrees. Molecules and atoms are in magnetic orbits the same way the moon orbits the Earth. Gravity is a type of magnetic pressure related to weight.

You know if you just changed "magnetic pressure" to force you would be spot on. You are even describing different forces ad different types of magnetic fields. It really seems more a terminology issue here.

I don't think you know what you are talking and are just pretending.

The same forces you described are also described in physics. Electromagnetic forces that bind electrons to protons, the Strong Nucleonic force which binds Netrons and Protons. The weak force which performs quark flavor hanging, and gravity a long range force.

The reason I specify terminology as a problem is because they have a lot in common, as you are implying by condensing them all to magnetic forces. For instance, the electromagnetic and weak forces at higher energies are identical(All 4 force carrying particles act like photons).This is called Electroweak theory. Under a certain temperature, 3 force carrying particles interact with the Higgs mechanism and acquire mass. We call this the weak force, and the main difference is the mass makes them more potent but much shorter lives(They lifespan is less then a protons width). Under even hotter temperatures, the electroweak force becomes identical to the strong force. At extremely almost plank temperatures gravity is predicted to be identical to the strong and weak forces.

It seems to me you are describing these same forces just putting magnetic in front of them. Only time dosen't combine with the others, frankly it's mostly used as a fourt dimension sometimes for math purposes. It really isn't the same.

Magnetism is not the same thing as magnetic weight. I never said it was. That is why its called gravity.

Then why call it "magnetic" weight? Simply weight and gravity does it just instead of adding magnetic which some might confuse with Magnetism.

It is more like a pressure. Magnetic pressure is gravity. I will say it again that the word Gravis means weight or heavy. Gravity is magnetic pressure or weight inside the Earth's atmosphere. The magnetic field around the Earth is generated by the mass and density of the Earth. That magnetic field is then ionized. This is the pressure inside the atmosphere.

Then you should be able to measure gravity, acceleration, and in different strengh magnetic fields(Like the moon which has a very weak field or electric lines which locally have stronger magnetic fields then the Eart). Is this not correct and why?

Well, the whole point of "alternative physics" is, that it "does not agree with accepted physics".

But it should at least somehow agree with observations and easily performable experiments.

And it would be nice if it was coherent and making any sense and/or at least consistent in itself.

OP's ramblings sound a bit like what a Malkavian would say ;-)

Time is complex. There is perception of time which is related to the consciousness and then there is decay which determines the lifespan or time matter exists. The ancient Greeks spoke of three different versions of time one called Cronos representing overall time, Kairos representing a moment of time, and aion representing eternity.

How do you define time because increasing pressure to make a clock go by slower does not make time go by slower. It makes the count go by slower. Time is regulated by decay or existence. Here is how time is defined.

the indefinite continued progress of existence and events in the past, present, and future regarded as a whole.

particle physics is nonsense, gravity is a lie, nukes don't even work, the lhc is a big hoax

you're a big hoax

They refuse to acknowledge that time is defined as existence and not the measuring tool itself. A clock is not time. Existence is time. An increase in gravity speeds up the counter on a clock from the increase in pressure.

Time is measured in distance as it is defined and for a reason. A clock that is slowed under gravity would have to be corrected and then the time it was off would have to be added on after that correction under normal gravity to equate for distance or time lost. This means it is moving forward. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The reason this matters is because gravity and its increase in pressure causes an increase in decay. Time is measured in distance. For matter that distance is its mean life time and the rate of decay determines its mean life time.

http://www.alaskapublic.org/2014/04/11/research-facility-to-shut-down/

http://goldenageofgaia.com/accountability/weather-warfare/haarp-decommissioned-scientists-gone/

this was years ago. but, is it really decomissioned? i dont know, but the article says there are two more like it in norway and russia. also it is a more common concensus in the ct community, that haarp was a weather manipulation project and not a human oppression tool.

HAARP is used for various purposes including weather manipulation, mind control, and manipulating magnetic forces.

can HAARP machine cause catastrophe like texas today