If I am right about this, then I just changed the field of seismic prediction forever-
528 2017-08-23 by ParsingSol
The top of this graph is the BZ componet.
source UNEXPECTED GEOMAGNETIC STORM G1- G2-class geomagnetic storm occurred during the early hours of Aug. 22nd when the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) near Earth unexpectedly? tipped south. This opened a crack in our planet's magnetosphere. Solar wind poured in to fuel the strong but short-lived storm. Updated 10:17pm
Abstract: 'If' my theory is correct on geo-magnetic harmonic resonances, acting as inductive towards the earths planetary flux tubes. (causing earthquakes)-
If that inductive charge does in fact play a role in seismic intensity rating. Then it will and should be proven by the very significant breach occuring, (at this time).
So if you ever wanted confirmation of the legitimacy of what ive been doing. It's about to come as this breach comes to an end. (Within -12 hours of the breach closing).
What we should see is:
The biggest earthquake on earth for the 2016-2017 year. (to date)
With multiple large aftershocks appearing globally- (as my past posts outlined)-
So this is a big post for me!!!
This will practically show the entirety of the reddit user platform and world that the POC (proof of concept) to my project shows a great value to humanity as a whole;
Confirming solar to seismic relations; With all updates and thoughts being attached to my user history... As I proactively tracked the event in real time. (again). From start to finish.
No joke; This post may change the world today forever... Keep your eyes on the bz. And don't say I didn't work my ass off to provide you this information-
Cheers, and all my love! Parsingsol
691 comments
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Remindme! 1 week
1 RemindMeBot 2017-08-23
I will be messaging you on 2017-08-30 17:42:59 UTC to remind you of this link.
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
http://archive.is/ftOPZ
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-08-23
Do you mean 12 hours from this post until later, is that the time range?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Once the breach is closed. -12hours time.
12 hours is generous. (imo)
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
I'll bet you $100 in btc it's not gonna happen.
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-08-23
He isn't betting anything so I would gladly take this offer. win win
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I will accept it if it does. But I am literally in debt.
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
i think your conceptual grasp on betting is about as strong as your conceptual grasp of seismology.
1 MASTURBATES_YOUR_DAD 2017-08-23
Great insults, love the contribution to the sub!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I think my conceptual grasp is fairly on point. So ty.
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
we'll see in 10 hours.
1 BlackPortland 2017-08-23
4 hours to go. Maybe it will happen like 1 second before the time is up. This redditor is verysmart obviously. I mean. He's going to change geophysics forever and win the novel prize all in one night. Can't wait.
1 Absentia 2017-08-23
Let's see where the goalposts move now.
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-08-23
How strong is your conceptual grasp of seismology? Because if it is strong I trust you'd be prepared to point out flaws in his theory?
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
strong enough I'm willing to put $100 on the line...
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-08-23
So what's wrong with it? To me it sounds pretty crazy, but I wouldn't know since I know nothing about it. It would be interesting if you could argue for your point.
"I don't believe this" "Oh, why not?" "Not gonna say, but I'm pretty sure"
What's the point of even commenting then?
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
I can chime in with my take. He picks earthquake locations based on probability, and has yet to show data that demonstrably shows evidence of his theory as it relates to earthquake timing. In the absence of that, I would expect earthquakes to occur at the same general rate. The biggest quake of the year was a 7.9 in January. Since 8.0+ are statistically unlikely over any short time span, I conclude that there will not be one within the next 48 hours.
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
to get $100 of OP's money when his prediction doesn't happen.
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-08-23
Then you're in the wrong sub. Start your own betting sub if you prefer that over discussing conspiracy theories.
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
nah I like this one and I'm not breaking any rules.
1 1234yawaworht 2017-08-23
How is the OP a conspiracy theory?
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-08-23
I assume OP believes there has been a cover-up about these matters, but maybe I'm wrong.
1 BlackPortland 2017-08-23
OP don't have $100 he dropped out of college
1 practicallyrational- 2017-08-23
Oh man. That's like.. a half hour worth of work on a Mercedes.
You're really showing off eh?
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
so is that a yes or...
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
so is that a yes or...
1 TheSaintOfStories 2017-08-23
You better pay up!! I'm watching you! I've personally seen this guy predict an earthquake some 12-24 hours in advance, so I've got some faith in or boy, u/parsingsol!
1 TheSaintOfStories 2017-08-23
You better pay up!! I'm watching you! I've personally seen this guy predict an earthquake some 12-24 hours in advance, so I've got some faith in our boy, u/parsingsol!
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
oh i'll absolutely pay up, still waiting on /u/sendmyabar to send me his wallet address.
...and an earthquake, still waiting on that too.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
'I'm going in coach!"
1 1-800-FUCKOFF 2017-08-23
What? I personally hope the guy is right about earthquakes, but you're a special kind of idiot...
Guy is going out on a limb and putting forward ideas that completely redefine what mainstream science causes earthquake, and you decide to put the burden of proof on people saying he's probably wrong as opposed to him having to prove he's right?
Christ, you're just profoundly stupid.
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-08-23
Wow, I'm sorry if I offended you man, but I literally can not help how my brain works. That's out of my control. I hope you understand that. As an adult man with a learning disability, I struggle with situations like these Every. God. Damn. Day. I do my best to not let people down because of my handicap, but I can only do so much. I wish I could do more.
Still, I believe the voice of differently abled people is a voice that needs to be heard, even on conspiracy. I will stand up for my right to be here despite your forceful words and I can only hope that at least you'll respect me for that, if nothing else.
I am here to be educated by my betters, sir, and if that is you; then I am more than willing to listen to what you have to say. I think it's disappointing to see such a reaction from the people on this sub that I had prior to this viewed as my friends.
I didn't mean to put the burden of proof on anybody. I didn't know what was happening. What I meant to say was that if someone wholeheartedly wanted to agree or disagree with his theory, then I would be very interested in hearing the reasons why they made that decision. I wanted to know why they would think either way. That way I could use their familiarity with the problem to my advantage as a tool and a base to form my own knowledge and solution on. Now, do you understand my reasoning when I asked him to explain why he disagreed?
I hope this clears up some stuff from earlier. I hope I haven't offended anyone on this sub because of my 'special kind' of handicap, as you put it. I also hope you won't be upset after reading this apology. I am sorry.
1 PM_your_rants 2017-08-23
Burden of proof just fell on you
1 samout 2017-08-23
Dude this user has predicted multiple earthquakes and is a known user. Basically the Unidan of earthquakes.
1 SixVISix 2017-08-23
What are your specific points for literally attempting to discourage the presentation of this idea?
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
just trying to make an easy $100
1 thisisnotmyreality 2017-08-23
the man's broke. what can he do?
1 InfectedBananas 2017-08-23
Maybe he's broke because he spends his time being wrong instead of making money.
1 Ballsdeepinreality 2017-08-23
Most people who succeed, do so by taking risks, in this case, investing time into something that predicts earthquakes.
Guy is doing something he loves. Maybe it takes age to realize that is worth more than money, because that shit doesn't buy happiness.
1 rickyshavinalaff 2017-08-23
this here^ dumb youngsters worship slips of green linen...utterly ignoring all of history's greatest thinkers
1 BigSphinx 2017-08-23
!RedditSilver u/InfectedBananas
1 RedditSilverRobot 2017-08-23
Here's your Reddit Silver, infectedbananas!
/u/infectedbananas has received silver 1 time. (given by /u/BigSphinx) info
1 TheWiredWorld 2017-08-23
Atleast he's not someone that upvotes a comment on alternate accounts. I mean, that's pretty pathetic.
1 Amos_Quito 2017-08-23
Pertinent mazer_rack_em quote:
/Them apples...
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
if anyone wants to take that bet feel free to put your money where your mouths are.
1 makeplayz 2017-08-23
I think he was making a joke dude.
1 downisupp 2017-08-23
something tells me that wont be the case in the future,
1 Sendmyabar 2017-08-23
Shit I'll take that bet
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
right on man, what's your wallet addy? mines: 1575h9fDgzZuMyuGeSnq57mrrnDGoNAmXZ
1 Sendmyabar 2017-08-23
I have it at home, I'll pm you when I get home, which should be around the time we'll know either way :)
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
right on man! no takesies-backsies!
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
unfortunately the time is up and you have lost.
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
why can't you pay your debts?
1 Sendmyabar 2017-08-23
Dude it's a bet with an anonymous person over the internet. Did you honestly think you were getting $100 coming your way? Go through everyone of my posts if you have to, dog every single one I make for the rest of time. Who gives a fuck? You think imaginary internet points mean anything? Stop acting like a baby. Get back on your ignorant high horse dissing people who are trying to figure out more about the world around them and not just taking the shit they are fed with a smile on their face. This will just give you one more thing to feel smug about, that's probably worth more to you then any amount of money :).
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
why can't you pay your debts?
1 onelasttimeoh 2017-08-23
I mean, I guess you're free to lie on the internet, but you might want to take a look at your life if that's what you want to spend your time doing.
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
!remindme 12 hours
1 NUTS_STUCK_TO_LEG 2017-08-23
You realize "taking" a bet means you're supposed to, you know, pay up when you lose...right?
1 utu_ 2017-08-23
i'll accept but at 10:1 odds. we're talking about a thread on /r/conspiracy predicting the biggest earthquake of the year. this isn't a 1:1 bet lol.
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-08-23
Ok, I was just wondering, little confused :)
1 Iockhherup 2017-08-23
Y don't you submit this to a scientific journal?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I dropped out of college. I don't know how?
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
absolutely shocking
1 EricCarver 2017-08-23
Was it Einstein that dropped out of college too? Betting there is a list of amazingly accomplished people that have.
1 mammadoodle 2017-08-23
Nope. There's an urban legend that Einstein flunked math at an early age, but the opposite is actually true - he was a prodigy who took advanced math courses in his pre/early teens.
1 Pologrounds 2017-08-23
Just like the myth that Michael Jordan was cut from his basketball team in high School.....he wasn't. He was on the Junior Varsity Team, and starred for them. His coach just placed him, a sophomore, on JV instead of putting him on the Varsity squad.
StayWoke
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
absolutely!
OP's not on that list though.
if you think they're right though that offer still stands...
1 EricCarver 2017-08-23
OP is trying to make the world a better place by working a hypothesis. What did you do today to make it better?
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
made 11,160 gallons of great beer and 1 good bet.
1 EricCarver 2017-08-23
:). Have a good night.
1 Kyroshill 2017-08-23
Just look at other articles for the format.... then follow it, posit your thesis, lay out your methodologies and your data collection techniques, describe the experiment in detail as to what, how, and when. Next you run your stats, and determine the significance level of your results. Posit an explanation and conclude.
Format it properly, write a letter with all your pertinents... and start sending
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
If you wanted to extract that information from me; I'd be happy to have your help?
I suck at it. I tried and it was greatly (embarrassing)?
1 digiorno 2017-08-23
Do you have a google drive with some research, hypotheses and algorithms? I'll take a look and see if I can help you draft a paper. I do RnD for a tech company.
1 HateTheLiving 2017-08-23
1 TheWiredWorld 2017-08-23
Dude BE the Will from Good Will Hunting.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Hope so :)
1 psyderr 2017-08-23
If I were you I would find established professors in the field - good ones - and email them
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Ive actually done this :)
1 psyderr 2017-08-23
...and?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Not a single ones written me back. :)
1 benmarvin 2017-08-23
Doesn't that cost money these days?
1 martini-meow 2017-08-23
When did the breech close? Or has it yet?
1 HempCO719 2017-08-23
Put me in the screencap!
1 selaromcire 2017-08-23
Ok, ill bite. how long have you been doing this work? any credentials to speak of? whether or not you went to college for this is irrelevant to me so long as the logic, science, and reasoning is sound. id be curious to see if your predictions are accurate.
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-08-23
It's a hit and miss, but from what I understand they are just tests/theories he is working on, eventually he'll get them right on the nose, with the correct data:)
1 astrofreak92 2017-08-23
The correct data won't help at all when his premise is bogus. There's no meaningful relationship between space weather and plate tectonics. And if there is any relationship it's too subtle to detect with the tools this guy is using.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
6 years. Independent research... I've helped friends at area colleges in geology, volcanism and earthquake studies. Attending workgroups on area beaches identifying different types of geology. PLU, and UPS.
No credentials. I joined the workforce at minimum wage to raise my daughter- ive been a jack of all trades ever since;
The logic, science, and reasoning are pretty well articulated. I likely am using inappropriate terminology. I am self educated, and have always lacked appropriate / professional instruction. Yet, it hasn't deterred me from attempting something bold with my life. In my constant pursuit to make the world a better place.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
Some of our greatest minds/thinkers/inventors were self educated. Never let anyone discourage you because you didnt waste tens of thousands of dollars at a state run propaganda program.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I just know my grammar, and education lacks professional articulation.
Also this phone is often a writers worst nightmare. Via fast posts and its constantly creating typos.
1 burnice 2017-08-23
Even authors of books have editors to help them with grammar, phrasing, structure and the like. You are fine. Stop being so self deprecating and just focus on the core mission of your interesting research!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Good point :)
1 selaromcire 2017-08-23
exactly, that was point. thank you.
1 bartink 2017-08-23
Really?? College?
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
You apparently disagree.
1 bartink 2017-08-23
Having been to college, yeah, I find your statement to be ridiculous.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
Hmmmm....having been to college myself, I know the statement is accurate. What? Did you think I had not been to college?
1 bartink 2017-08-23
Examples of propaganda in college?
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
You.
1 bartink 2017-08-23
Rofl. I'll go with I'm right.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
You can go with whatever you want! You were going to go with that from the beginning buddy. Look how much time I saved myself!
1 Popular_Prescription 2017-08-23
What was your area of study? With over 10 years of college I find your comments both insulting and ignorant. What evidence do you have of propaganda in college?
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
10 years? Couldnt find a job huh?
1 Popular_Prescription 2017-08-23
It took that long to get a Ph.D in my field... still no evidence of this propaganda you're so convinced of.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
What would you say the predominant ideology of higher education educators is and what would you say the predominant ideology of the students is, generally speaking, across the USA?
1 digiorno 2017-08-23
Remember what forum you're in....
Though I do agree with you.
1 selaromcire 2017-08-23
awesome, i look forward to your findings.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Ty.
Me too :)
1 -G-A-R-D-E-N-E-R- 2017-08-23
The Earth is a Dynamo— The Heliospehere controls the Earth through electro-magnetic-plasmic-Harmonic resonances.
1 5pez__A 2017-08-23
it's also made up of compressible crystal, so piezoelectric effects can be a possible cause.
1 Mouth2005 2017-08-23
Rock on man! I don't want to stray too far from the topic of your post but I just wanted to say thanks for being straight forward and honest with us, and not claiming to be some "geological/earthquake expert anon from 4chan". Full disclosure I rolled my eyes reading the title (sorry) but seeing your comments and involvement in discussion made me realize I'm an asshole for judging this post by the title because you're sincerely interested in this and you're not trying to bullshit your level of knowledge by claiming credentials you don't have, so thank you for this breath of fresh air.
I know it's not much but if you need any help in your research I still have access to JSTOR through my university and would be happy to look up any published papers/articles you may not be able to access due to paywalls.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Anything on earths magnetic flux tubes.
Coronal mass ejections.
The magnetic field lines and magnetosphere.
Or their general relationship with seismic events. As far as studies, graphics etc. :)
1 meta4one 2017-08-23
A inspiration to us all my man.
1 LurkPro3000 2017-08-23
I'm curious what you think about the increase in Strombolian eruptions over the past decades?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Closely related to solar activity in my opinion. I feel all volcanic and seismic events follow a unique pattern.
1 Rayfloyd 2017-08-23
GG man, grats on everything
Don't let the naysayers dissuade you from this great quest
1 Dr_Cowboy 2017-08-23
Holla at history being made!
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
What do you mean by breechnd how do you see ot in the graph?
Thanks.
Looks interesting.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
http://services.swpc.noaa.gov/images/geospace-1-day.png
When the top secrion of the graphs white and red lines move towards eachother. The breach will no longer be taking place. Within -12 hours an epic earthquake will occur.
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Thanks!
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
How confident are you in this prediction and where will the earthquake be>?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I originally and still do feel nepal is the likeliest location.
I am 100% confident a +7.0 will occur following the values I'd articulated to you all. More then likely an 8.0+
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2017-08-23
Damn, that's a pretty bold claim. Really looking forward to seeing this come true! Been following your work for a while now.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Ive been waiting for a good quake to publish :) It helps prove my concept.
Would be nice to have truly accomplished something so important in my lifetime :)
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2017-08-23
And I'd love to see that happen so that one day I can tell my children all about how I used to follow and help support the guy on who developed the current method for predicting earthquakes when he posted his work on reddit.
It's almost like I helped!! /s
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Would be cool though. :)
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
I appreciate your work here. I always enjoy reading your posts.
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Does the third mark count on the current graph where the red and white touch? ? http://services.swpc.noaa.gov/images/geospace-1-day.png When the top secrion of the graphs white and red lines move towards eachother. The breach will no longer be taking place. Within -12 hours an epic earthquake will occur.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
You want to see them riding close to eachother.
Breach looks open
When they ride along side eachother a bit. Thats when it occurs typically
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Great.
Thanks!
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Looking closer now!
1 LOST1992 2017-08-23
Any idea on where this earthquake could hit? Were you also the one that predicted a big earthquake in Nepal/Afghanistan/Turkey in the next 2-3 days?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I assess the main shock to strike a relevant fault line of this magnitude. So yes I am the same poster. Morning AATA. Note:http://services.swpc.noaa.gov/images/geospace-1-day.png
If ever there was an opportunity to prove my works credibility.
Its going to be as this breach ends...
This should be an 8.0 - 8.5 magnitude event. Based on the data above. Id argue at least a 7.8 intensity range.
That breach is the largest we've clocked all year.
I imagine probability wise via the main shocks epicenter; We are looking at: Japan or Nepal. 80% New Zealand or chile 40% Turkey, Italy 20%
I view faults as release points likely to relay the induction to ground current. Sorta like the single point a tesla coil is likely to strike dependant on the very conductive materials within its spectrum of harbored/ absorbed energy...
This concept is also how we will be able to reverse engineer and create a predictive algorithm.
I assess that the duration of events and intensity ratings within the solar data; in relation to imaging past recorded seismic data sets will lead to the creation of an advanced seismic prediction utility in short.
This post may help prove that.
1 LOST1992 2017-08-23
Thanks :)
1 ride_4_pow 2017-08-23
There was an earthquake in Italy the day of the eclipse. Does your research corroborate with this event? I try and keep up with your posts but maybe I missed something. Thanks for all your hard work!
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/earthquake-ischia-island-rome-buildings-damaged/
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I assess the european continent to be ground zero.
This is likely in comparison to earlier activity.
I more so try to track the largest velocity shifts. (in turn) tracking the largest earthquakes.
I'd need a computer to deternine the smallest ones. Been trying with little success to stimulate users resoyrces and funds to that project.
So yes, likely. Just hard to do this for smaller events as a whole. We need to use this information to our advantage. In hooes to dial the material down enough to make assessments for events of that scale.
1 JonnySpark 2017-08-23
I wonder why did you get downvoted for bringing this up.
Upped you back.
1 Omegafall1984 2017-08-23
80% Japan? Good thing that Fukushima thing has been taken care of /S
1 PunkChops46n2 2017-08-23
Thank bro... good stuff...
1 newhavenlao 2017-08-23
Thanks for posting. Love these prediction threads. Love it even more if there is theory and science behind it. Rather or not your prediction will come or not, I'll follow u until the 48 hours pass. Thankfully the fault lines u described doesn't effect me but for others within those lines... Best of luck to them.
The worst I felt was at 5.5 in Sichuan China. Not the 2008 one, that was quite high but the 5.5 happened a few years ago. I accepted my Fate then and was ready. Luckily it was no biggie. But the 8+ you are predicting in Japan or Nepal is quite scary. Hope it's not true but let's wait until the 48 hours are up. If u r correct, I want to be your follower and take all ur side chicks because many could see u as a mystic heh.
1 xlptu 2017-08-23
The last earthquakes were all after big breaches too?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Thats pretty much how ive been doing this. https://www.reddit.com/r/ParsingSol/comments/6ketf6/all_seismic_events_2015_70/
2015 nepal quake. April 25th. The archives available there. http://www.spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=21&month=04&year=2015
Last nepal quake followed a similar pattern. M class activity, with high solar wind flux and bz breach. Including a G1 geomagnetic storm.
So very similar data set on the registry.
1 AutoModerator 2017-08-23
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Bz graph backup http://archive.is/brEAQ
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Ty :)
1 BrickNtheWall 2017-08-23
I have no idea what you are talking about but you have caught my curiosity.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Big earthquake to come. Like really really big. Check back 48 hours.
1 libertyant 2017-08-23
anywhere in particular? is it 12 or 48h then?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I'd say a 48hour countdown from now is factually generous.
1 no1113 2017-08-23
Where would you say this earthquake is going to hit? Location?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Nepal.
1 snowmandan 2017-08-23
That's a bummer
1 zooka1 2017-08-23
I just died
1 Grarglejobber 2017-08-23
Take a trip out of the country for a bit?
1 ClassytheDog 2017-08-23
There was one 2 days ago, right? I could Google. I should Google. But I'm already typing.
1 OGMIOS14 2017-08-23
No region or anything?, because that's pretty specific We're in the middle of a festival here. These probabilities have been killing me lately. Having to keep on my toes every now and then.
1 Analiator 2017-08-23
Id say its highly improbable Nepal would get hit by an earthquake of that magnitude. I dont see any reaason. According to my non-existant calculations, similar to yours.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Awesome! So if im right its like a googleplex to one!
1 awkybears 2017-08-23
Hopefully it's not the big one that is expected on the west coast (Vancouver here)
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I think a 6.0 near cobb seamount could unfold trending the main shock. As well as one near axial seamount / sanfransisco bay. They already had a similar foreshock there. So a heightened intensity could in my opinion strike those zones.
1 awkybears 2017-08-23
Same timeline for my area?
1 Step2TheJep 2017-08-23
And if you are wrong? What then? What do you have at stake here?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
My reputation as always.
1 satyadhamma 2017-08-23
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000aah5#executive
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
1 The-SaltLife 2017-08-23
Saving this comment for later
1 imtheninja 2017-08-23
In which area?
1 TheRanchDressing 2017-08-23
remind me
1 BrickNtheWall 2017-08-23
Thanks for the reply. I discovered your sub in one of the comments below and just subbed. Looking into this a bit more I'm finding it pretty interesting. Will be anxious to see how this plays out. Good luck in your research and if it can help others in the future that is great. Although, if there is a big quake I pray for minimal casualties and harm be done to those in the area.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Agreed entirely.
It hurts me to see people injured. I think thats a big part of doing these posts.
1 justinsayin 2017-08-23
REMINDME! 48 HOURS
1 Deaconblues18 2017-08-23
Define "big". 8? 9-plus???
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
true thoughts are 8.5 +/- .2
1 InfectedBananas 2017-08-23
And what if you are wrong like last time? will you just ignore it and move on to your next "big thing coming!!!!!" post?
1 commentfreely 2017-08-23
You don't get to posit crazy theories AND be wrong AND be taken seriously. However, if there is a huge earthquake in Nepal in a few days I'll be back...
1 TheWiredWorld 2017-08-23
Well he's risking his reputation - but also, it's not like you have to come into these threads and shit all over the walls - if the guy's a nut, he's a nut. But if even a percentage of a chance that he's right, even if it's not THIS one, then it could be something big.
You people on the internet act like you're losing something other than your time that you willingly give up.
1 murphy212 2017-08-23
Hating people who go out on a limb is a form of conformism.
I remember how people in France absolutely hated Paco Rabanne for publicly stating Mir would crash on Paris in July 1999. The guy was a multimillionaire, and a very well-respected figure; he had absolutely nothing to immediately gain by doing this; he thought he had cracked Nostradamus (century 10:72, 3:97, 6:97).
Well Rabanne was wrong, but still fire engulfed a "new city" at "fourty five degrees", almost exactly one year later. Nobody ever heard anyone say his prediction of a flying metallic habitat crashing down with fire and fury on a great city wasn't all that wrong after all.
So in conclusion there exists almost no selfish advantage in making bold/precise predictions; if you're right conformists will say you were lucky or cheated; if you're wrong they'll never forgive you.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
I just assess data lol. ;)
1 justinsayin 2017-08-23
48 hours past now.
1 Redditor_on_LSD 2017-08-23
So...with all due respect, why is this in /r/conspiracy? Is what you're proposing rejected by the academic community? When plate techtonics was proposed it was unanimously rejected by the scientific community, but that's just stubborn scientists clinging to conventional wisdom.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I just know/feel that data points to a serious incident. In what I think we should be looking for.
Im just a guy:)
1 tornadoRadar 2017-08-23
talk to you then.
1 Divin3F3nrus 2017-08-23
REMINDME! 48 hours
1 Divin3F3nrus 2017-08-23
REMINDME! 48 hours
1 justgimmieaname 2017-08-23
can you ELI5? did you find significant correlation between 2 event series?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
In progress. :)
1 darkuknim 2017-08-23
Remind me 24 hours
1 the_honest_guy 2017-08-23
its "Remindme! 24 hours".
1 justinsayin 2017-08-23
Remindme! 24 hours
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 24 hours "Absolutely nothing happened, as usual"
1 YoureAllRobots 2017-08-23
In before you are kidnapped, labelled crazy, and your work is stolen and passed onto the next Zuckerberg/Musk/Tyson.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Luckily its public. I did try contacting Space X recently though to point em my way :)
1 Chuck_Rogers 2017-08-23
Did you post to any other subreddits?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Nope. Just here. Did some that were blacklisted from seismology.
1 PM_your_rants 2017-08-23
Which is absurd, because you offer the ability for repeated testing; the very basis of scrutinizing a theory.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
?
1 PM_your_rants 2017-08-23
If you were blacklisted by seismology, but you have a valid theory, then it can be posited that their interest doesn't lay in understanding their field at any cost. Your method meets the criteria necessary to be considered a theory as it is able to be tested repeatedly. For them to dismiss it because it goes against what they've been taught is a bit closed minded of them. It seems similar to how traditional doctors typically scoff at the entire field of holistic medicine while some holistic medicine is remarkably effective.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Completely agree.
I think its just my writing skills as a whole. Kid doesn't know basic grammar so "He's an idiot"!
That: or they have been working on a similar system?
1 drk_etta 2017-08-23
Hey been following you for a long time. Since your switch of accounts too. But I want to make sure you don’t toss all your work if this doesn’t play how you have called it. This is still unexplored science and still has unknowns. So don’t stop what your doing if your POC doesn’t land this time around. We learn from it and continue progressing.
1 PM_your_rants 2017-08-23
Took every word out of my mouth but you probably articulated it better
1 drk_etta 2017-08-23
Thanks! I'm no where near on some of these guys level such as /u/ParsingSol, but I have been following this stuff and taken it up as an almost amateur. There are real correlations and possibly very accurate prediction models if we can nail down all the data points. It's awesome work and sadly ignored by most mainstream science. But we could all be crack pots. :) guess we will find out.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I think it will ultimately work. :)
1 drk_etta 2017-08-23
Yup! Got faith in you!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
1 murphy212 2017-08-23
Well I wouldn't bet it does :)
Take a subsidized expert; make sure he's old enough to have invested tremendous "intellectual" capital in his field and favorite theories; realize his ideas and stature wholly define who he is; indeed his self-identity is profoundly tied to the words he utters and the opinions he (thinks he) has.
He will fight you to the death for challenging his ideas (especially if you're relying on truth), because you represent a threat to who he is. If his ideas/opinions are a laughing stock, so is he. If his ideas/theories disappear, so does he.
1 ThermalStability 2017-08-23
Have you tried talking to the guy who runs the youtube channel suspicious0bserver?
I'm betting he would be interested in hearing what you have to say.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I attenpted to write the physicist that did his work for him. Thats as far as I've gone in terms of reaching out. :/
1 i_LOSNAR_i 2017-08-23
great channel, been watching it for years
1 keptfloatin707 2017-08-23
been watching you post I think you had a different user name for a while or something really appreciate your work and its very interesting to see these predictions come true the accuracy is very creepy but compelling.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Its bound to get better over time. I am shit at accuracy. Id be interested to get other observers collaborations on that. My main point is the pitch and how it relates to predicting the intensity. If we know ones coming. We are that much closer to identifying where it will strike. Time is important. A general warning is nice to have in these events. The slightest bit of information in advance can literally save entire cities over a millennium.
1 keptfloatin707 2017-08-23
I wish I knew math so I could help you out man it's really impressive people hating just don't got anything better to do . There's different methods of coming to the same conclusion just cuz there's not a formula out yet doesn't mean your wrong
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I think its a very simple concept really. What I don't get is they are literally arguing to not build a device by default of stating it doesnt work.
So can we check it?
1 keptfloatin707 2017-08-23
I'd be down I'm just the wrong guy lol Reddit reaches the whole world I'm sure someone out there can help
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
For sure. Thanks for reading and verbal support anyways. :)
1 keptfloatin707 2017-08-23
Keep doing what you're doing you'll figure it out
1 jimstar777 2017-08-23
Wow..my hat off to you. Question: can you explain the relation/reaction if any..from the eclipse and if there's a connection to the current solar phenomena you have described?
1 astrofreak92 2017-08-23
He did, he has an alt called /u/TotalHexagon5 that's been spamming subreddits with this.
1 TotalHexagon5 2017-08-23
Actually not an alt, but someone who likes trolling for comments
1 internetsstuff 2017-08-23
Who'd you contact there? I have some ins, so there's a chance (no promises) I could get some eyeballs on it.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I just type who ever writes me really.
1 internetsstuff 2017-08-23
For sure, use like a contact form on their website or something? Or reach out to someone specific you found on LinkedIn, etc?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Working on it. Trying to get my pc back :(
1 internetsstuff 2017-08-23
Ahh gl with that, cheers for the very interesting idea. A quake would need to hit 8.0 to be the biggest in the 2016-2017 range, correct?
1 mehblah1211 2017-08-23
Don't worry you are wrong
1 RDS 2017-08-23
love what you've been doing and I'm a huge.
Just a thought on this -- what if this spike you've observed results in an increase in the number of earthquakes we see worldwide as opposed to it all combining into one massive earthquake?
Checking https://earthquaketrack.com/recent, it seems there were a lot in the last 10+ hours but none seem to break 5.0.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Trust me. Its like ringing a gong. The shows just getting started. :)
I call it a bell ringer because a near 8.0 +/- strikes. Then followed by several heightened seismic events globally. Maybe something like elastic rebound theory.
1 RDS 2017-08-23
I think I get what you mean about a gong -- sort of that intensifying resonance effect?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Yep. Peak outburst followed by various resonances.
1 OB1_kenobi 2017-08-23
So in simple terms, energy from the Sun powers Earthquakes?
Sun = power source
Earth's metallic core = receiver
But I'm not understanding the mechanism that converts this energy into earthquakes.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Flux tubes.
Imf field.
Magnetic induction via imf and yes it essentially is responsible for our cores temperature regulation.
1 cutol 2017-08-23
Musk Tyson sounds like the name of character out of a postapocalyotic novel.
1 YoureAllRobots 2017-08-23
Neil Degrasse Tyson
1 cutol 2017-08-23
Sounds like a kid who gets his ass beat every day at school up until grad school.
1 no1113 2017-08-23
Hijacking this thread just to say...
:( If OP is right, Nepal is fucked.
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
He's made many, many preditions and has never been right.
So it's very unlikely.
1 YoureAllRobots 2017-08-23
Oh, do tell mr 30 day old account whose motives I would never question.
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
What on earth does that have to do with the accuracy of my comment?
Is that the best counterargument you have to offer? If so, it's pretty pathetic.
1 YoureAllRobots 2017-08-23
I've been here long enough to see Parsing hit a lot of times, thus the validity of my comment stands.
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
Example?
1 YoureAllRobots 2017-08-23
They have these things called search engines.
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
You make the claim, you provide the evidence.
All the predictions he posted here failed to result in anything.
1 YoureAllRobots 2017-08-23
Well, hey, we should just completely dismiss everything he has said and done because he may be wrong here. lmao
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
All his detailed predictions have been wrong. All of them.
Name one that hasn't.
"There'll be an earthquake in an earthquake-prone zone" obviously doesn't count.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
What is his accuracy ratio of success v failures?
1 YoureAllRobots 2017-08-23
What is your accuracy in predicting earthquakes? His is way better than yours.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
I've only been at this for two weeks, but I did better than he did last week, and here is my prediction for this week.
1 YoureAllRobots 2017-08-23
Yeah, talk to me next year. Build some credibility.
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
What credibility? What prediction has turned out right?
1 Tewks44 2017-08-23
I have an old account. Does that mean I get to weigh in?
This prediction is wrong and stupid.
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
Any additional comments to this?
1 mikellerseviltwin 2017-08-23
what work has been stolen and passed to any of those three people?
1 johnnight 2017-08-23
'Member Martin Armstrong?
1 YoureAllRobots 2017-08-23
Good info.
1 FuckRedditThreeTimes 2017-08-23
.
1 DRYERWOLF 2017-08-23
Remind me! 1 day
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Are you referencing this storm?
1 Secret-Service_Agent 2017-08-23
I could be wrong, but weren't there supposed to be "Black Sky," drills scheduled for August 23, today? I heard a lot about them, but haven't seen anything today. I ask this because I noticed the storm link you shared referenced weak power grid fluctuations as a possible side effect.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
No idea, but geomagnetic storms aren't an uncommon occurrence.
1 Secret-Service_Agent 2017-08-23
Do you know how severe they can become (the storms)? I was just wondering if the eclipse could have accelerated the severity of the storm. I heard about "Black Sky," drills scheduled for today which are supposed to prepare for a potential EMP event. I just found it curious that these drills are scheduled on the same day as a solar storm. Last I heard, it was supposed to be Aug. 23, but it may have been moved.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Eclipses don't affect geomagnetic storms.
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2017-08-23
Do you have any links? I haven't heard anything about a Black Sky drill, nor can I find anything, but I'm super interested. Especially with them scheduling a drill during a geomagnetic storm.
1 Secret-Service_Agent 2017-08-23
It's weird, I found it on this sub once and now I am having trouble finding it too (which is why I said I could be wrong). I'll keep searching and let you know.
1 Secret-Service_Agent 2017-08-23
Source used in Reddit post I saw
Actual Reddit post that made me wonder about it.
Idk how trustworthy TruNews is, but many other sites that have shared the article all source it from TruNews.
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2017-08-23
Thanks! I'll check it out
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Technically, yes.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
So it finished at 1800 UTC?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Its had false positives. The breach is occuring mildly but closing at this time. We are getting very close.
I dont know of a better graphic to assess / predict the incoming winds?
1 ChelseaClintonsTeeth 2017-08-23
Where do you think it will hit?
1 ShastaAteMyPhone 2017-08-23
Any chance this sets off the "pending" Cascadia quake?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I think cobb seamount and axial seamounts general vicinitys will see 6.0's.
1 Event_Horizon12 2017-08-23
What is the conspiracy?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
People argue if this is real or not. I.e. does solar activity cause earthquakes on earth.
Seismologists argue its terrestrial forces. With no significance to interplanetary devices?
1 Event_Horizon12 2017-08-23
Interesting. What is your theory as to why solar activity would affect Earth's seismic activity?
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
Im sorry, but I really want you to be wrong. :(
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
If I am right; it could help save lives in the next event? :)
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
true.
1 MilkyWitness 2017-08-23
Liz?
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-08-23
Mike McD you lost?!?!
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
It's an unconventional win.
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-08-23
In the game of life, women are the rake
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
Ive never read truer words on reddit friend.
1 casualjane 2017-08-23
This just made me realize how exciting this is, Global. Wow.
Question: Why are you predicting the quake to be of such scale? Is this type of jump in Bz rare?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Its not to say rare. Just heightened. High speed velocity shift and high proton density. Invisible plasma tubes conveying into the planet while absorbing and inducting its current.
I think we can read the live feed for high intensity pulses to the flux network. These events are typical before our largest seismic incidents. That's what I am trying to prove anyway.
1 casualjane 2017-08-23
Thanks, well, it appears to have died down. I'll be watching
1 thelords_cheeps 2017-08-23
Me too :(
The largest quake on record, sadly, will change a lot more than science.
1 thelords_cheeps 2017-08-23
Me too :(
The largest quake on record, sadly, will change a lot more than science.
1 felixlivesagain 2017-08-23
largest quake on record for the year of 16-17
1 madbubers 2017-08-23
Is this the guy that always predicts earthquakes and hasn't been right yet
1 DanBetweenJobs 2017-08-23
Don't know if I agree with the science as a layman myself but damn this would be a great movie script or real life version of Arthur C Clarke's Richter 10 if this happens - says the guy in geologically mostly stable New England
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I've truly tried finding more material on earths flux tubes.
I think physicists could write a formula and literally extract the laws of this system and the induction process.
Wrapping your mind around things like thermo dynamics is an interesting hobby. But I will be the first to say that I am not a genius... I just see something of a process happening here. I don't know how this became a hobby. I've just done it long enough to find specific values of predictable nature. Which I argue we can ultimately use to our advantage.
1 MarcAA 2017-08-23
So coronal projection from sun modified our magnetosphere? I can see it having a possible effect but what mechanism causes an earthquake from that? Isnt the majority of the energy dissapated in the atmosphere? How does it get to a fault line?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Via a flux tube. Which conveys within the planets core / dynamo. It inducts electric properties via absorbtion increasing its velocity.
1 RocTheBuzz 2017-08-23
SOMETHING BIG IS HAPPENING
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
?
1 RocTheBuzz 2017-08-23
just hopeful in your data/findings
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Ty :)
1 tjswooshmenzada 2017-08-23
Thanks for your work. Always love your posts
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Ty. :) This ones going to be one of my biggest quakes plotted in my opinion. :(
Hoping it checks out. This is what I need to prove the theory has science backing it.
1 ForeignAlphabet 2017-08-23
Have you observed earthquakes in correlation with these "breaches" before? Or would this be the first correlation that backs up your theory?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
A great deal of them have followed this unique pattern.
I feel if we imaged solar winds bz and proton levels along sode woth usgs records that a predictive algorithm could more accurately assess the likly probability of an earthquake. (Via the live data).
But this is not my first rodeo. Im not a computer and generally speaking the planets 5 million miles. So locating the exact area to be struck vs the 10million relevant data points makes accuracy a bit of a bitch in terms of location. The intensity assessment is pretty good though.
This incoming quake should prove that.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
How did you choose the locations in this post?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Locations are based on probability.
1 SpongeBobSquarePants 2017-08-23
Please share that data.
1 NZImmo 2017-08-23
He wont - Because He's "doing this on a phone" and it's too hard
1 Zerophobe 2017-08-23
He has publicly released most of his model so....
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Released it where?
1 Zerophobe 2017-08-23
Check his history
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
I can't find any equations, specific correlations to positive and negative results, or links to any test data going back longer than a few months.
1 NZImmo 2017-08-23
There arent any - It's all just bullshit
1 TheMadBonger 2017-08-23
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6ijaop/update_on_my_advanced_earthquake_prediction_model/ is this not what you wanted?
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
I can't determine what exactly has been modeled there. Using that post and applying the linked geomagnetic storm, how would it produce the prediction that he posted here?
1 Slntskr 2017-08-23
remindme! 48 hours
1 God_Emperor_of_Dune 2017-08-23
Can you explain a little bit more about your theory? What causes you to think there is a correlation between solar activity to geological activity? Just from studying the past correlations? Or is there more to it?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I feel that as solar plasma penetrates the earths outer magnetosphere, it stagnates allowing the earths flux tubes to absorb the material. This causes induction upoing the velocity of their course.
I assess they convey into the planets core dynamo. Causing rising temperatures to expand magma. Which causes cavaties to form. The constant changes of pressure and or collapsing all together. Lead to a P wave. Which makes its way to the surface causing an S wave. Which is named as an earthquake.
The process is unknown. I don't intend to establish the entirety of mapping it. Yet I do wager that in spite of knowing fairly little about the process taking place. That we can extract a great deal of helpful information from it. Which will eventually lead to a highly advanced model in determining future seismic predictions.
1 God_Emperor_of_Dune 2017-08-23
But do you have a why behind this?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
6 years constant monitoring of data. Trial and error. Lots of coffee. And many succeeded tests conducted prior to my attempting to identify a relevant explanation and use for the information...
1 haveyouseenmymarble 2017-08-23
So in a sense, the Earth gets microwaved by solar plasma causing its core temperature to rise, in turn causing a wave of thermal expansion in the Earth's magma which will then cause any one of the surface's seismic hotspots shake. And I'm assuming you're making your location predictions based on previously observed patterns in terms of when and where the plasma hits the Earth, is that fair?
It's a fascinating theory (if I understand it at least somewhat correctly), and from your predictions so far it seems there's certainly already a fair amount of POC available. If correct, accuracy should only increase over time.
Which places do you expect to be hit this time, I can't seem to find any statement on that.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Nepal is my primary.
I see many series taking place following the "bell ringer". Following this quake for upto 6 days. I expect many of the earths most seismic locations to show near or over 6.0 activity.
I have a post two prior to this one which touches bases on the locations I feel are most susceptible to see activity. Just clict my username and the submitted tab.
Also, yes. That was a pretty good synopses. :) I also agree that poc should be established already.
Would be really nice if someone wrote and offered me some ability to move forward? Hoping it happens someday and soon too. Poverty is a fickle mistress.
1 haveyouseenmymarble 2017-08-23
Thank you! Just to further my understanding of what we're talking about; is the idea that the energy in the form of solar plasma is itself the cause of the seismic energy (making the magnitude of the quake directly related to the amount of plasma energy taken in by the Earth's core), or rather that the plasma intrusions act as triggers for pre-existing tectonic tensions (which, if they can be measured could serve as risk-indicators and allow for adequate preparation longer beforehand). Have you thought about this?
Also, you mentioned flux tubes. I tried to find an intuitive explanation for what they are but I don't fully grasp how you think they play into this. Where do we find these electromagnetic tubes and what exactly is their role in this scenario? Do they guide the plasma energy in a specific way to the surface akin to lighting following a specific narrow path determined by surrounding factors?
Assuming you could determine your own funding freely, how would you move forward from here? Do you have a plan?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
https://youtu.be/ymZEOihlIdU
http://www.iflscience.com/space/plasmasphere-series-tubes/
From what I understand flux does not heighten in scale. Induction essentially amps the velocity of the system.
I imagine these tubes convey within the planet. The velocity shift of the conveying likely produces heat or energy exchange in our earths dynamo.
I see faults as paths of least resistence and this being an ejection system for that deposited energy.
This likely explains how / why earthquake lightning makes its way to the atmosphere, as opposed to coming from the sky.
I do view the system as an induction scheme. If x amount of material is recieved, Y earthquake energy is likely to occur.
My thoughts are to build a model with a relevant company in hopes to extract the systems true values. We can image past seismic and solar data sets; using the largest events as control values.
Then once we do this sequence the frequence and sequence of events as the control incidents took place.
We would then use the basic known probabilities of area seismic incidents and the known frequencies in a cross reference to an algorithm. (simply switching the model into a live mode). In hipe we can triangulate the location and probability of solar to seismic data as a whole.
If I was funded I'd work to establish a relationship with predictive modeling companies and programmers. From target to ibm and predpol. In hopes we could accurately show a cause effect relationship. Which fowards the ability to create a poc and mvp.
Predpols algorithm may be a very helpful application to use. In terms of their already established coding.
As they extract location data and incidents to establish a known and needes location to place a L.E.O.
My thoughts are use their model. Then apply the live solar data as an 'incidents feed'. Using their algorithm to sort through all past incidents on record. To give a diagnostic as to where an event would likely occur.
1 haveyouseenmymarble 2017-08-23
Fascinating ideas, thank you for explaining it in more depth. I could never quite wrap my head around what you're actually working with, but it strikes me as a surprisingly intuitive concept now.
I hope you can prove a conclusive correlation with this one. The rest should be mainly a matter of contacting the right people. There have to be tons of people out there interested in cutting edge concepts like this who would be eager to test them scientifically and thoroughly.
Having a properly formulated thesis with predictions and correlations would increase your chances of finding the right people to develop the predictive software immensely. Have you approached someone about that? A student or professor of geology or seismology perhaps?
I really hope this goes somewhere, it would be a tremendous milestone for humanity.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Ive tried to get it to some respectable sources. :)
1 cuntflapper1 2017-08-23
Remindme! one week
1 TXROADWARRIOR 2017-08-23
As a geophysicist, good luck buddy! i've been following your subreddit for a while now and love your dedication.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
/r/parsingsol
Would live to hear your thoughts:)
1 thegerbilking 2017-08-23
Have you checked out dutchsinse? He's been doing earthquake forecasts for years now
https://www.youtube.com/user/dutchsinse
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I almost worked on a piece woth him in 2011. On an unrelated subject. But we couldn't provide enough evidence to run with it. I personally like dutch and if I created a model. He would be an honored collaborator. In the event he accepted to participate. He's also a nice guy, but what I like most about him; is that hes rational and grounded on the material he attenpts to publish. That to me is a solid solid work ethic.
1 yokothespacewhale 2017-08-23
You grammar's pretty fine, you just have trouble compounding sentences. You try to make a whole independent clause (complete sentence) out of prepositional phrases or just simply don't punctuate them correctly. Really, if you just understood periods as the end of a complete thought and disregarded commas entirely, you'd be fine. If you want perfect grammar, think of commas as things you put at the end of each complete thought you have in a single sentence (I like butter, but I don't like potatoes.) or put before/after prepositional phrases (If I die, take this pen.)
Nonetheless, I like everything you do here and I'm an english nerd so i feel obliged to post this... hopefully buried enough noone cares to read it.
The "most" correct way would be say "On an unrelated subject, I almost worked on a piece with him in 2011." because the latin influence on our language tried to force us to not end sentences with prepositions. But, you could nonetheless write it correctly as "I almost worked on a piece with him in 2011 on an unrelated subject." or "I almost worked on a piece with him in 2011, on an unrelated subject." Stylistically, I prefer the former as when spoken, there really isn't much of a pause there. TL;DR: you simply didn't need the period there.
Here you connected a complete thought (I personally like dutch) with an incomplete thought (If I created a model) then ended it with a period. "If I created a model" is obviously meant to be paired with "He would be an honored collaborator." So, the correct way to write this is a single sentence would be exactly as you wrote it, just with better punctuation "I personally like dutch, and if I created a model, he would be an honored collaborator." Perfect example of a prepositional phrase sandwiched between two complete thoughts in a single sentence there.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
See to me this is genius, and it own coding. (did I do that right)
1 yokothespacewhale 2017-08-23
lol! See, to me this is genius, and it('s?) own coding?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I failed english on my ged 3 times. (the essay). But scored high enough in math and science to nearly pass the entire test. The essay was pass fail:(
3 times :(
1 makeplayz 2017-08-23
It's would be the correct usage. Also in your previous comment you said "noone," it should be no one. I felt obliged.
1 yokothespacewhale 2017-08-23
no it wouldn't be because he's contracting it and is. that would make it "it's" not "its". "Its" is the possessive.
And you got me on noone but that's dumb bullshit.
1 makeplayz 2017-08-23
Its shows possession, it's is the contraction of it is. Its own shows possession. It's own would be it is own. I am right. You are wrong. Take your L and move on.
1 yokothespacewhale 2017-08-23
that is literally EXACTLY what i said.
1 makeplayz 2017-08-23
It's exactly what I said too. But you replied that I was wrong.
It's own coding is correct, which is what I said.
When you put it('s?), it was a sign that you were unsure. I let you know the correct usage, that in that context it would be "its own." You told me I was wrong. El oh el
1 yokothespacewhale 2017-08-23
lol ok asshole... just trying to help. It seems like you must enjoy people not taking you seriously. Amazing how you can transcend modern geophysics when you can't even be bothered to remember or relearn grade school linguistic skills.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I meant your comment was genius. English is its own code. A code I am terrible at. I am thankful and I read every word of the advice.
I really suck at English.
1 yokothespacewhale 2017-08-23
sorry man... i thought you downvoted and were actually insulting me.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
No not at all man :)
I didn't even vote yet or anything. People are just indifferent?
1 hoeskioeh 2017-08-23
I wish you and the theory all the best, but this feels kind of like that Enigma movie scene with Bumbleduck Cucumberpatch: people waiting and hoping for their own ships to be torpedoed to crack the Nazi ciphers...
I hope you're right for the future, but I hope for the now there will not be a major quake :-)
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Honestly. I hope we learn from it.
1 hoeskioeh 2017-08-23
Me too. No offense meant.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
1 bartink 2017-08-23
Hypothesis, to nitpick.
1 CurseOfTheRedRiver 2017-08-23
I always upvote your stuff even though you don't believe in hollow earth and therefore have no clue how to properly predict anything related to the earth since you have incorrectly modeled it.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I think we have an exotic core. Likely plasma related. Like a cold fusion variety.
1 dinodares99 2017-08-23
That's literal word salad. Wtf does that even mean?
1 ThurgoodLeroyJenkins 2017-08-23
When does the breach close? This is very interesting OP
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
When geo magnetic storming is essentially over. I am unaware if the space weather prediction center offers this assessment to be honest. It would be helpful though:/
1 ThurgoodLeroyJenkins 2017-08-23
I had to subscribe to your subreddit. I was looking back at some of your past posts and it looks like you may be on to something.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Awesome man. :)
1 MilkyWitness 2017-08-23
Are you saying we will be seeing the largest earthquake on earth in recorded history within the next 12 hours? When does the breach close? Do you know where it'll be? What about the Juan de Fuca plate? I love your work btw, I know you have accurately predicted things before. You should really watch your back if this comes true, not to fear monger but you really should watch your back.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I think the main shock will occur within 36 hours time.
Everything is dependant on the incoming solar winds. I assess that the BZ will close 'fully' within 12-24 hours. And that the earthquake will come within 12 hours top. From a fully closed Bz component.
1 MilkyWitness 2017-08-23
What exactly is the relationship between the solar storms and earthquakes? Is there a resonance frequency that the solar storms create that vibrate fault lines inside of the earths crust at a frequency humans cannot detect? Perhaps this has to do with some of Tesla's research about vibrational frequencies?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Flux tubes and their conveying within the planet. Having been inducted by speculated electro magnetics.
1 MilkyWitness 2017-08-23
Have you read any of the scientific papers written about ionosphere anomalies and magnetic precursors to earthquakes?
Such as these:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117797008922
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2011JA016628/full
I find this very interesting. I'll be doing more research on my own about this, especially if your model comes true.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I've read several :)
I think the system they use now. That reads electric pulsations prior to an earthquake. Is the same signal I am tracking in advance.
1 ifrikkenr 2017-08-23
The predicted solar winds, NOAA SWPC show the main strike will occur around now-ish and wane away by the 26th - the decreasing wind is when you typically predict an event to occur from what you've said previously so this seems to corroborate your timeframe.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
So 36-48 hours. :)
1 Vastator88 2017-08-23
Well, let's say I hope you're right. Hoping the big earthquake will occur on a desolated area of course.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Me too.
:(
1 Lynxes_Hearit 2017-08-23
You deserve to be right. But something in me also hopes you're wrong, this doesn't show very positive.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I see the good in it :)
1 TheGreatOni19 2017-08-23
I hope this goes well for you.
Cheers.
1 Vaedur 2017-08-23
No need for reminders on this post tbh, either the ground is going to shake like nothing we've seen in a bit and we will all remember, or he will be wrong, and no reason to kick him while he is down. Continue the good work.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I agree fully.
1 darkuknim 2017-08-23
Remind me! 24 hours
1 Balrogz14 2017-08-23
Where are you predicting the earthquake to hit?
1 EndlessOcean 2017-08-23
Any idea where? Predicting there will be an earthquake will most likely prove you right as they happen every day.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Initial thoughts are Nepal.
1 EndlessOcean 2017-08-23
can I ask how you ascertain the location? Is it based on the rift/break being directly above the location? How do fault lines factor in to the equation and how do fault lines correlate with the location of the break?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Technically its frequency vs past seismic scale in addition to most probable location to exhibit future intensity.
1 EndlessOcean 2017-08-23
so is there any correlation between location of this 'crack' and location of earthquake? It sounds like what you're saying is you're basing the predicted location on them being 'overdue' or not for an event.
1 SixVISix 2017-08-23
Some recent news to note.
A mag 5 quake has hit the Phillipines today and near simultaneously a mag 2.x quake has occurred in Puerto Rico today
Geologically, these could be irrelevant or they could indicate the beginnings of a larger general disturbance. I'd be interested to check Pacific rim activity and atmospheric concentrations of electrical activity globally. I'm not able to look at either til later but both also occassionally supply telltale signs of seismic interference/disturbance activity in their behaviors.
Right or wrong, I respect the amount of work you put into this and thank you for your efforts. As for the naysayers, fuck them. If we can't introduce and discuss ideas not found in textbooks, what is the point of this sub?
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Philippines has been averaging roughly a quake every three days for the past month or two. https://earthquaketrack.com/p/philippines/recent
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
A user reported massize lightning last night in Pennsylvania.
I imagine the rising seismic intensity now, is in addition to the past / incoming solar data.
My thoughts are we can improvise a smart algorithm to identify smaller scale activity. By reverse engineering the largest events on record which compliment the patterns.
1 Quantumcreep 2017-08-23
Are you familiar with the work of Suspicious Observers?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I am.
1 gotFan552 2017-08-23
Looks like Bz is splitting OP.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Its falling backwards. Meaning decreasing in intensity. Were not full stopped yet. Hence the upto 48hr time frame.
My guess is 30hrs +/-
Maybe 18 for a full closing.
1 lepornjames 2017-08-23
You have every right to present any theory. Especially with solid sources. Good for you to push the boundaries for the rest of us to model after. Good luck on your journey!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Thanks man.
1 wombatrion 2017-08-23
Remindme! 1 week
1 Glaive101 2017-08-23
Remindme! 48 hours
1 Prox1ed 2017-08-23
Hey, I've been following your work for a while now. I remember when I first came across a post of yours, I thought it was just a bunch of rambling with slim chances of it being actual data, and simply brushed it off. But then a couple days later I saw a news article talking about a quake in the exact area you described, along with a magnitude in the range you predicted. I remember thinking in my head "Holy crap, that guy was right". Ever since then I've been following all your posts. Ive seen you predict countless more quakes since. I think you are definitely on to something, and am really hoping for this prediction to be right. If you are right on something of this magnitude (pun intended) It will help your cause greatly. I really hope to see you with a full team and funding one day, i think you would make great breakthroughs and discoveries. Keep up the great work man, you have more silent supporters than you realise!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Thank you for taking the time to post this.
It means a lot to me that I've gained attention on this platform. I hope truly in the end it opens the doors to a full time career, as well as the creation of my hypothetical model. Into a hopeful and hopefully useful (mvp) for global distribution.
Ive just made some compelling and often argumentatively useful correlations in data. I wanted to specifically thank you for reviewing that data prior to your personal conclusions as well.
This is all our project and every users concerns and even questions have helped me adapt and learn about the processes taking place; That I myself am still exploring.
It means a lot to me, and like my efforts are worth it. :)
1 qualityproduct 2017-08-23
I'm rooting for ya
1 ASentientRobot 2017-08-23
I'm either too dumb or too smart to understand what you are talking about but we had a lightning/thunder storm last night that was scary.. so loud. Have not had one like that in awhile. Pennsylvania.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Schumann resonances might be right up your alley.
1 ASentientRobot 2017-08-23
is this like that schroedinger guys cat?
1 gotFan552 2017-08-23
Probably too dumb :). But rejoice, that just means you can get smarter!
1 ASentientRobot 2017-08-23
not this smahhhhhht.
I am more of a book worm than a math geek
is it theory type stuff?
I don't get geometry but have excellent pattern recognition skills.. i am not sure if that even makes sense.. this is what a test thing told me and Geometry was the bane of my life in my school days.
I always scored exceptionally well in the reading/comprehension side of he aptitude tests and average to very slightly above on the math piece.. oh well.
1 gotFan552 2017-08-23
Fuck all standards tests. All standardized tests were made by someone else who may or may not be more intelligent than you. Your "intelligence" (ability/capacity to learn) is simply a reference point of their world view.
If you're good at one thing and it's enjoyable for you... study it! Sooner than later... you'll realize that all things in the world are related and from your first passion you will have developed more passions and more knowledge. Life only gets more colorful and more exciting as you develop the ability to perceive the hidden and infinite colors and gems you simply wern't able to perceive before.
I do warn however that at one point you may find yourself surrounded by information overload to the point where you may become blinded. When that happens you'll simply need to decide to question that paradox.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
No its an upper atmospheric frequency. Closely related to lightning. Also known / suspected to be closely related to earthquake prediction.
1 EclecticallySound 2017-08-23
Exact same here but in Scotland at 4am. Fork lightening and howling winds and rain.
1 Glaive101 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 48 hours
1 HickNamby 2017-08-23
If you're right: COOL! earthquake prediction always needs to be better! Kudos to you man damn without even a degree.
If you're wrong: Don't feel that just because you put so much work in already that you take shortcuts and recalculate for a later date just to keep your current conclusions intact
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Mainly what I do.
This should be an epic event though:)
1 Jodi2 2017-08-23
GL!
1 ILoveJuices 2017-08-23
Isn't this how haarp causes earthquakes?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Technically. Yes...
I started to wonder the validity of haarp rumors when identifying this systems potential.
1 izzzzzzzzzzzzz 2017-08-23
upvote! always appreciate your research efforts, hopefully the data can show you correct.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
1 DarthStem 2017-08-23
Even if it doesn't happen I appreciate yours and u/nirubuchaser and your dedication to studying and logging these events and bringing them to our attention.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
No worries.
I am about 90% sure though. Unless I've missed a vast amount of sleep for nothing lol
1 DarthStem 2017-08-23
I'm pulling for you, just hope it doesn't hit Alaska.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Should be ok there really.
1 felixlivesagain 2017-08-23
me too a mean im pretty central but a major disaster would put a damper on my palmer fair trip.
1 DarthStem 2017-08-23
I'm in SE. I don't want barge service fucked up.
1 felixlivesagain 2017-08-23
oh yeah my work relies on a lot of freight and that would mess up everything. hadn't even considered that.
1 DarthStem 2017-08-23
SE and most of Alaska would be pretty fucked if the barge went down. I wouldn't want to be in any of the communities when the food stops coming in.
1 snakeaway 2017-08-23
You're dope. Keep doing dope shit.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
1 SpongeBobSquarePants 2017-08-23
G1 Class - Minor GM storm - Average of 1700 every 900 days. G2 Class - Moderate GM storm. Average of 600 every 360 days.
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation
These aren't major storms so why do you phrase your posts to give the impression they are out of the ordinary?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I didn't? (that is a personal thought of yours)...
1 SpongeBobSquarePants 2017-08-23
You are using extremely comment events as input into your equations without telling everyone how common they are. This leads them to believe the events are much more significant that they normally are.
You can avoid being called out by this by documenting in your posts how common such things are.
1 socsa 2017-08-23
Rofl
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Gimmie 48 hours.
1 Definitely-Not-CIA 2017-08-23
R.i.p. OP.
1 Iceboundend 2017-08-23
Hoping your wrong man
1 Iceboundend 2017-08-23
Hoping your wrong man
1 Dippy_Egg 2017-08-23
Been following your work for awhile now, wish I had any expertise in anything you've been asking for help with to forward your project, but alas.
I am excited for you! Hoping that you gain additional insight into your theory. Looking forward to hearing about the outcome of your prediction.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
gets popcorn.
Hoping its more eventful then the eclipse. :)
Also hoping it doesnt kill anyone :(
1 Dippy_Egg 2017-08-23
Yeeeah...there's that. :( Felt a little odd wishing you an earthquake to further your theory, but you know. If you're right, in the long run a prediction and warning system ends up saving lives. :)
also gets popcorn.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
1 thebabyseagull 2017-08-23
Good luck.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Ty :)
1 sweaty_clitoris 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 12 hours
1 crumblingempireinc 2017-08-23
Thank you for all your efforts!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
1 GetOutOfBox 2017-08-23
I am willing to bet this guy is LARPing lol, this smacks of pseudoscience. But I guess we'll see.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I don't think you realise how good I am at this ;)
1 The-SaltLife 2017-08-23
So be real with me Doc - In reality, if your prediction comes true, how exactly will this change the world forever? Really curious about this because if Im witnessing this happen right now before you become some Nobel Peace Prize winner, I want to know everything I possibly can.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
No one can say if you're good because you won't publish your accuracy of predictions vs outcomes over any substantial period of time.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I think we got earthquake prediction skills through predictive programming easily. Its a system.
Any data plugs adapt it to a more relevant use.
I want to locate earthquake 'pitch'
This is intensity vs time. Estimate that with a system and triangulate known probablities woth comparative data on past records. A computational model is more accurate then me.
I literally just assess earthquakes that way.
If others feel they can too?, There is likely unknown forces interacting in a way we havent fully explored. I think extracting it in an imaging process and reassembling it with massive factors such as impulses of electric matter via induction. It may prove an impertinent role to the process of a seismic prediction utility.
Basically :)
1 The-SaltLife 2017-08-23
Dang... that's awesome.
Well good for you and I wish you the best. You obviously have a knack for this.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
No one can say if you're good because you won't publish your accuracy of predictions vs outcomes over any substantial period of time.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
No one can say if you're good because you won't publish your accuracy of predictions vs outcomes over any substantial period of time.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
All users can Feel Free To Do That :)
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
I assume you keep some kind of spreadsheet with predictions, outcomes, and notes. Why not just post that?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
My posts are my spread sheets. I just back date past data via select online archives. I do current live assessments. This is my archive.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
That pretty much says it all.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
It says alot. I never claimed to know it all.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
I will be honest here. At first I thought that you were a guy who was really interested in science and the process of discovery, but just didn't have a formal education. I thought that was super cool, because anyone can get into science no matter their background. I think I was way off base though, and what you really like is the attention that you get with these posts.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I just do what I do. I dont do spreadsheets. Im not that kinda guy. Call me an idiot. Im not being reckless or misleading to my intentions. Its just an idea. Its a very big idea. Its a system to identify a pitch scale to identify the estimated magnitude of an earthquake in advance.
That in addition to basic probability may determine an ultimate system of exreme value and reliability. (in terms of advanced seismic warning systems)
I am literally just a guy...
1 rush22 2017-08-23
Surely you can make a spreadsheet while you're waiting.
1 GetOutOfBox 2017-08-23
Saying you are good does not prove you are good. This is the internet man people aren't just going to take your word for it if you don't elaborate
1 jubale 2017-08-23
LARP means pretending. Whether his theory is right or wrong, he's serious.
1 Cera_is_Tops 2017-08-23
remindme! 36 hours
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
This should ultimately be the effective time line. Ty for extracting the values. 48 is in my opinion generous. Yet I don't compel the wonds themselves. Lol
1 madmarvcr 2017-08-23
Reminder to myself to check later
1 eoghanf 2017-08-23
You've made a reasonably specific prediction - "The biggest earthquake on earth for the 2016-2017 year. (to date) With multiple large aftershocks appearing globally- (as my past posts outlined)-" but what about location and/or timing? Can we agree that "within 3 days" is sufficient for timing? If the biggest earthquake of 2017 doesn't happen within 3 days your theory is bunk?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
So long as the data reflects it. For all I truly know the breach maintains its course that long. While I don't assess that. What I am implying is that its an accurate statement in terms of the Bz zipping shut and no event occuring for 48 hours after. (in addition to a mild seismic intensity range following those circumstances).
I think in the end you will learn I am not wrong however.
Thats what makes this post so interesting ;)
1 jubale 2017-08-23
I think what you're saying is "yes, assuming the solar activity in the next while follows normal patterns". It's hard to understand you even though I have a science background, because breach and Bz zipping are not terms I'm familiar with.
1 felixlivesagain 2017-08-23
I hope you are right man. I have been following your work off and on since the first time you predicted an earthquake. it would be incredible to see you being right like the birth of new understanding of how shit works.
1 PizzaPartyP0desta 2017-08-23
I've seen your posts in the past. Very interesting and I wish you good fortune, sir.
1 Sendmyabar 2017-08-23
As much as I don't want to cheer for an earthquake I hope you're right man. What you're doing is raw science and that you cop so much shit from assholes who won't consider anything that isn't the established theories is indicative of what is wrong with the culture of science in our current society. It sucks you gotta do it so tough with no funds but in my opinion you're one of the foremost scientists in the world today.
1 FromMyTARDIS 2017-08-23
I doubted you last time, you proved me wrong. I really hope it's some way far away no one gets hurt type of thing. But I also hope you are correct, because learning to predict earthquakes would be great!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I feel like its strafing east a bit. Could be wrong all together.
1 DarkPyramids 2017-08-23
If your theory is correct in anyway you could be the next Tesla.. And by that I mean youll be killed/bankrupted and your research confiscated
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Its all public for that reason. Build it yourself, and tip me kindly?
:)
1 DinduMuffins69 2017-08-23
There won't be jack shit.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I might miss its location. But its coming.
1 DinduMuffins69 2017-08-23
Still waiting.
1 felixlivesagain 2017-08-23
Wait. 12 hours from now or 12 hours from when the breach closes? when is the breach closing? is that something we can predict? is a breach in the magnetosphere like ripples in the surface of water covered by say Lillie lads where they all slowly drift back over the hole?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
So far ots assessed to act like bubbles. Independant ones.
I dont personally know if there is a prediction chart from the space weather prediction center. I just assess 24 hours tops on that. 12 hours on after tops for an event.
The full synopses would be -48 hours. 36 hours +/- est.
1 felixlivesagain 2017-08-23
ok I look forward to the shocks. god speed
1 XxJefferson-StatexX 2017-08-23
Who do you work for?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I am currently Unemployed.
I work to be employed or employable? Kinda a goal of mine... :)
1 The-SaltLife 2017-08-23
This is fucking awesome!!!! I'm glad im witnessing this and I hope you become very successful with this!!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Thanks. Just hope it works itself into a good thing:)
1 redteamalphamale 2017-08-23
Shit man, life got me busy so I haven't been helping but this might be the one that gives us enough data to get the model ever-moreso right. I hope the lives lost are minimal, but you have been eerily on the dot the last few times. I do have to say though, I don't like IBM. I think we should look for funding elsewhere.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
To be honest... I have no idea how to program. I can explain what we need to do. But I have no idea how to do it. Maybe pm me a tele?
1 DANNNY_SCO 2017-08-23
How long left?
1 sweaty_clitoris 2017-08-23
Sometimes I hope you are wrong,
but hopefully you are correct in terms of confirming your model. Maybe people will take the data you have gathered seriously.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Man I try. This seemed like a big event.
1 sweaty_clitoris 2017-08-23
I checked the solar weather yesterday and saw the G2 storm. Not surprised to see your post today.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
Suntards We Ride! Ive had my intensity thingy up a while in parsingsol. It works pretty good all year. :)
1 sweaty_clitoris 2017-08-23
What is your intensity thingy? I usually check solarham.net (except this time, until he gets back from vacation lol).
1 AFSPM 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 48 Hours
1 boabsmith 2017-08-23
remindme! 24 hours
1 biT-Rich 2017-08-23
RemindMe 36 hours
1 Workmask 2017-08-23
/u/parsingsol is a legendary content creator on reddit. Right or wrong, you have amazing dedication and though process my friend.
I both wish that you're right because this system will save countless lives, and I hope you're wrong and that we don't see a disaster.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Ty. I could be entirely wrong.
1 tastygoods 2017-08-23
You are not entirely wrong. The theories are perfect common sense. So remember even something as predictable as a shotgun will misfire or not go off on every single trigger pull.
There could always be another undiscovered component to the triggering mechanism. Maybe the increased stressors are more fluid then imagined and don’t always combine or multiply with the latent energy in a particular plate. Or plates have more plasticity then we anticipate etc.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Agreed. I expect far more peoples imput is absolutely necessary to gain too. I think there is far more of a static electric force here. I don't know why were not focusing on the using of it as a tool to our advantages... Seems logical. :)
1 LongLiveTheWorld 2017-08-23
What is your follow up plan if you are right?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I don't really have one quite yet?
I just think it would be easiest to sorta keep attempting to do the model for now?
1 LongLiveTheWorld 2017-08-23
I agree you should stick to the model.
But maybe it would be good, if you are right, to get in touch with some official institution.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I try this in between tests really.
Ive gotten enough positive results to gain some very professional users opinions which greatly shaped the cause effect relationship of my theory.
Theres much to learn in all of this. Hoping to get a career in the field in the end of it all :)
1 LongLiveTheWorld 2017-08-23
Well all the best of luck to you! How long is left before an earthquacks should occur?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
https://www.disclosurenews.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/schumann-resonance-august-24.jpg
Getting close.
1 LongLiveTheWorld 2017-08-23
Exciting!
1 Toezy_Weezer 2017-08-23
Suspiciousobservers.com
1 manananaas 2017-08-23
Is this why they had earth ex 2017?
1 htok54yk 2017-08-23
When the biggest earthquake ever doesn't happen in 36 hours will you make a follow-up post and admit that you are wrong and wasted everyone's time?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Ok.
1 TeamXII 2017-08-23
Even if it's proven incorrect, at least it was interesting! I'd say it's a no bigger waste of time than anything on Reddit haha. Also, the biggest of 2017
1 SuperPoop 2017-08-23
I just want to say that this thread is a breath of fresh air!!
... Now, how can I make this fit my political agenda??.....
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Take money out on predicted seismic regions insurances. Profit.
1 Hatlessspider 2017-08-23
I don't know your particular political agenda, but if OP is correct, then it easily could fall into the category of biblical end times type disaster which as any conspiracy user knows can be used how you like
1 SuperPoop 2017-08-23
Ah, then I better buy my Alex Jones bunker food and supplements.
1 Hatlessspider 2017-08-23
All you need is SUPER MALE VITALITY
1 WhoisTylerDurden 2017-08-23
remindme! 48hours
1 Fighter9595 2017-08-23
can someone ELI5 please?
1 tastygoods 2017-08-23
Imagine the Sun is like a big microwave and the Earth is a big round cherry pie inside of it.
The pie is a nice mix of mostly soft lumpy gooey stuff on the inside with a hard crunchy crust on the outside.
The microwave is always on which slowly warms the pie.
Some times the microwave power goes crazy and turns itself up (the solar wind u/ParsingSol is tracking.) the pie suddenly gets a bigger spark of heat on the inside which causes the cherry lumps to expand and put more pressure on the outer crust.
Occasionally the spike of extra heat causes the cherries to expand so much that they burst through the crust, which we experience as an earthquake.
1 punit352 2017-08-23
Thank you.
1 Fighter9595 2017-08-23
thanks, that's easier to understand
1 SuperPoop 2017-08-23
So... if I'm rooting for you and your prediction... does that also mean I'm rooting for massive destruction?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Kinda by default? Unless its a really rural and desolate region. :)
We can have our cake and eat it too.
1 thebotguy 2017-08-23
remindme! 24 hours
1 CrestingWaterfall 2017-08-23
Sooo, where we at with the timing?
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
His bz lines came together a few hours ago. So I guess 12-24 hours from when that happened.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Its half closed... Still downward vector and calming winds. Good for the test. Bad for users in seismically active areas.
1 Kind_Of_A_Dick 2017-08-23
Good luck to you. I'm not an expert in seismology, so what is the layman's version of what you're saying? There's going to be an earthquake between/around what times, of what general magnitude, and where? I'm just asking what I should be looking for.
1 Tha_Dude_Abidez 2017-08-23
Thanks for this. I've followed your posts for along time man and I wish you the best of luck. I know I'll be following this. Ignore the ignorance and hateful comments in this thread. I would guarantee each and every one of them wished they had some type of passion for something so strong as you do for this. I just bought a Powerball ticket and if by some extremely remote chance I win, you'll be hearing from me.
1 bow_chika_wow_wow 2017-08-23
Where are you from? Is English your native tongue? You seem to have a lot of ideas you would like to share with us, but I have hard time understanding and verifying your points.
1 Naraine 2017-08-23
Hoping for Yellowstone eruption
1 mtlotttor 2017-08-23
I hope you're right.
1 sorceryofthetesticle 2017-08-23
Remindme! 48 hours
1 Ethereul 2017-08-23
Remindme! 1 week
1 slurmssmckenzie 2017-08-23
Posts like this make r/conspiracy worth it
1 JournalismSureIsDead 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 48 hours
1 BearAreDyslexic 2017-08-23
Remind me 12 hours post breach
1 WarlordBeagle 2017-08-23
Where is this earthquake supposed to happen at?
1 uFLYiBUY 2017-08-23
Nepal
1 Wood_Warden 2017-08-23
Love your work ~ it is definitely probable that the Sun's activity effects our seismic tensions, and your (and others) work shows this pretty much without question. I hope this pans out and you help to save many lives.
1 Prof_JL 2017-08-23
One guy on reddit vs. all the world's scientists
Fight!
1 uFLYiBUY 2017-08-23
Im just posting for history sake. Very interesting.
1 NotDaFeds 2017-08-23
Literally changing the world. Bravo.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Just trying to :)
I think this really works :)
1 JeanLucPicardAND 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 72 hours
1 SplinterLinter 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 3 days "Big earthquake"
1 Benroark 2017-08-23
Keep up the good work man! Hope you meet with success.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Time keeps on ticking ticking ticking into the future. :)
No but it woyld be awesome if I nailed this outta the park :) I hope I do! No offense to anyone in it. if it factually comes :(
1 Benroark 2017-08-23
Yeah, I felt a bit weird after wishing you success. Obviously I wouldn't want anyone hurt!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Me neither :(
But it can improve future watning systems so im rooting for a rural area. :)
1 Analiator 2017-08-23
I wonder, Why dont you ever release your calculations. Or the probability of Where and when and What magnitude?
Oh? Cause you dont want your bullshit exposed.
Is this your last "gotta be lucky now to comtinue" or Will you Find an excuse if it doesnt happen?
Anyway seeing you're making a prediction; here I go:
Going on vacation in a couple days, seeing bad shit seems to happen when I do... 8+ in Indonesia (60%) and same in chili/Peru(40%) somewhere start of September.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Dude make your own posts?
Choose a five day range :)
1 Analiator 2017-08-23
2-7 September?
Last time it got deleted cause was targeting you☹️ besides got downvoted into oblivion.
1 crestind 2017-08-23
Bookmarked and popcorn ready. I want you to be right because it would be a great discovery, but I want you to be wrong because then some poor folks are gonna get destroyed.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Everything happens. :/
1 Luckzzz 2017-08-23
REMINDME! 48 HOURS
1 4702four11 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 48 hours
1 0xFEEDFACECAFEBEAF 2017-08-23
You should x/post this to voat u/ParsingSol
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I am trying to get my computer back with a friends help. Pretty broke lately. :(
1 0xFEEDFACECAFEBEAF 2017-08-23
Bro, DM me an address and I'll send you a desktop or laptop to you free. I strongly believe everyone should have their own machine. I work in cyber security and believe strongly in the one person, one computer thing. I have plenty of extra machines. If you need the help I can lend a system. Stay up!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
If my friend cant help I might take ya up on it. Having a lil faith in him though :)
1 Fuckaduckfuckaduck 2017-08-23
As usual; frikkin amazing. It's absurd that you are scoffed at by scientists.
And that, is all we need to know about the intentions of modern scientists.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Gotta hit it first:)
1 MrNiceDude 2017-08-23
They are being skeptical. It will always exist in the scientific community for good reason.
1 naturalproducer 2017-08-23
...and sometimes for bad reason.
http://www.ucsusa.org/center-science-and-democracy/promoting-scientific-integrity/how-corporations-corrupt-science.html#.WZ76_yiGPIU
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
what's amazing about being wrong?
1 cholera_or_gonorrhea 2017-08-23
Ignore the haters here. Your dedication is fantastic.
1 aLiEn23ViSiToR 2017-08-23
Your "forever" will last (if true ofc) when the next person says this will change the world "forever" lol and i doubt its gonna last... nothing lasts forever and change is inevitable.
Anyway, thx for the warning and it would be great if this kind of a thing could save lives !
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Agreed. :)
1 gbs2x 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 48 hours
1 fght 2017-08-23
Can someone tell me if this happens. I never k ow if these things happen.
1 Catsarereptilians2 2017-08-23
http://ds.iris.edu/seismon/?
Will show you activity.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Summon remind me bot :)
1 makeplayz 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 40 hours
1 Trieste02 2017-08-23
Interesting theory. Exciting if it turns out to work.
Sorry if I am missing the obvious, but when would your model predict the earthquake - is there a delay between the geomagnetic storm and the seismic activity and if so how long?
Also, there are thousands of earthquakes throughout the world (most too small to matter). How would you 1) eliminate the possibility of coincidence or conversely, 2) make sure that an earthquake caused predicted by your model is not "lost" in the noise of all of the other earthquakes that occur all of the time.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Build from largest events to smallest to mitigate. Attempt to find a medium. Use live conparative modeling and past data plugs to locate probable sequencing and frequency to match live data. In addition to predictive modeling and advances solar data prediction. Maybe a 5 day lead. +/-
1 Trieste02 2017-08-23
So when do you predict the next big earthquake based on this?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Getting pretty close imo. Waiting on bz to dial down.
1 nonbiological_entity 2017-08-23
Hi u/ParsingSol, how is Japan looking? Specifically the Kansai area...
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Honestly just a bump more then a typical activity imo.
I just feel like the recent north russian sequence lowered your overall seismic risk. Forgive me if im mistaken. Sumimasen. :)
1 nonbiological_entity 2017-08-23
Thank you so much as always for taking the time to reply.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
No worries. Im watching with everyone else at the moment lol.
The bz is almost at a closing point. Looks good. So. Hoping for a full close and loss of speeds in terms of solar winds. :)
1 God_Emperor_of_Dune 2017-08-23
What is the bz?
1 fearoffearof 2017-08-23
This is not how it works. I wonder if the lack of event will cause you to accept that you may be wrong, rather than insist it was some minor problem in calculation. You were sure, based on your current beliefs. You were wrong, will your belief be amended?
One of the most important aspects of science is admitting when we are wrong and improving our methods, not making up methods to prove we're right when we're wrong.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
He predicted a 7.0+ quake hitting it before August 28th.
1 nonbiological_entity 2017-08-23
Thank you kindly!
1 vash_the_stampede 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 24 hours
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
Why do you keep predicting huge earthquakes when nothing ever comes out of it?
You know what real scientists do? They first verify that their predctions are correct and then they publish their theory.
1 Zane_888 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 48 hours
1 overtaxedoverworked 2017-08-23
Won't happen, just like the eclipse "predictions". OP will come back with a new post begging for money because the only reason their predictions failed was due to "lack of adequate funding".
1 BrickNtheWall 2017-08-23
Haters gonna hate.
1 overtaxedoverworked 2017-08-23
Not hating, just know a scam when I see one.
1 kelvinmead 2017-08-23
And...
1 rush22 2017-08-23
Nothing.
1 AutoModerator 2017-08-23
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 k_pasa 2017-08-23
RemindMe! 1 week
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Tbe two red and white lines at bz are getting closer. Is it close enough to say the breach has closed or do they needt o be closer? http://services.swpc.noaa.gov/images/geospace-1-day.png
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
It looks to be getting close. Every now and then it will have a false positive. (false closing). Its truly a jerk sometimes lol. But your pretty much thinking / feeling what I am. :)
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Remindme! 1 day
1 GoodVSHero 2017-08-23
what if we focused on trying to block solar stuff? any idea how?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
No clue really :(
1 420illad 2017-08-23
Commenting to keep up on this
1 Riotgamesstillgay 2017-08-23
What's your plan if this prediction fails? Honest question.
1 diehardgiraffe 2017-08-23
Same as it always is, ignore it and post again with a bold prediction in a couple weeks.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Learn from my mistakes. More worried about being right really :/
1 Riotgamesstillgay 2017-08-23
maybe next time
1 rednazgo 2017-08-23
!remindme 48 hours
1 murphy212 2017-08-23
It takes courage and confidence to be making bold predictions like this, to open oneself to ridicule. So thank you.
Even if it doesn't pan out the way you thought it would, that means your understanding requires enhancement and fine-tuning, not that the path is wrong, or that the underlying comprehension is mistaken. Please keep at it; once you're confident enough to have figured it out, write a book.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Why would it not mean that the path was wrong?
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
by that logic this theory is unfalsifiable and scientifically useless.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
I hope that everyone made it through the big earthquake ok.
1 overtaxedoverworked 2017-08-23
Thanks to OPs warning I made it out of Nepal, unfortunately having to leave my family behind to suffer through the biggest quake in the past 2 years. Their stories are a harrowing account of survival and the most inspiring exemplification of the strength of the human spirit I have ever heard.
They now pray to their God, /u/ParsingSol every hour and ask where they can send their precious Bitcoins once he again starts begging for money due to the unequivocal, absolutely undeniable success of his prediction model.
1 Middleman79 2017-08-23
.
1 nitro_aphrodite 2017-08-23
i'll be watching this!
https://earthquaketrack.com/
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Me too. Its my favorite site!
1 TidderJohn 2017-08-23
Why not just use this one?
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
I like www.electricquakes.com its been around the longest and has the electrical solar info as well.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
What are some examples of large prior earthquakes associated with breaches?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
/u/parsingsol earthquakes lists 2011 - 2016.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
So none that you can think of?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
nepal april 25th 2015 Check the 21st for the increased activity. 4 m class ejections. Rapid succession. Much like our 3 c class 1 m class event this week.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
How would that week differ from an expected quake output from the biggest events that year found on 3/17/2015, 10/7/2015, 6/23/2015, and 12/20/2015 just to name a few? Those were all significantly larger events.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
https://www.reddit.com/r/ParsingSol/comments/6ketf6/all_seismic_events_2015_70/?utm_content=title&utm_medium=hot&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=ParsingSol
Probably bigger solar incidents. Check the plots 5 days in advance.
1 AutoModerator 2017-08-23
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
4 M class ejections. How is that different from the 4 m class ejections on 4/21?
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
3/12 saw 4 class m ejections. I looked up 4/21 and it only had three.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
https://www.disclosurenews.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/schumann-resonance-august-24.jpg
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Link doesn't work for me
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Schumann resonances - Wikipedia Wikipedia › wiki › Schumann_resonances The higher resonance modes are spaced at approximately 6.5 Hz intervals, a characteristic attributed to the atmosphere's spherical geometry. ... A new field of interest using Schumann resonances is related to short-term earthquake prediction. Interest in Schumann resonances was renewed in 1993 when E. R.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
And the 2015 earthquake that you mentioned showed this same resonance, while all of the examples that I listed did not?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I am unsure. Thats what makes exploring these incidents important. I feel there are far more correlations in the data then your taking into account.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
What other correlations are you using?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Its outlined in my subreddit? Past archives, and live data. Comparative modeling...
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Well, I guess we will find out. You predicted in the other thread that those quakes will hit by the 28th, and that this one would happen within 48 hours, so we should have some answers pretty soon.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Exactly :)
1 God_Emperor_of_Dune 2017-08-23
What are you thinking?
1 Conspiranut 2017-08-23
ParsingSol, I highly suggest you read this and consider adding the information to your models.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html
You can build a Geiger counter pretty cheap and radioactive sources can be found in smoke detectors.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Americium ;)
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Wait. what? Something related to the sun is chanfing radioactice decay rates?
Thats huge.
1 GWtech 2017-08-23
No.
Something that shows correlation with solar activity also shows correlation with radioactive decay rate change.
We dont know if it originates with the sun or is something that affects the sun.
It could be planetary solar sydtem electric plasma variations or something else.
There is no reason to beleive its nuetrinos or that it originates within the sun.
It could originate in the earth and project itself onto the sun via earth sun plasma linkage.
1 Conspiranut 2017-08-23
Define "it" ?
If "it" originates in earth, what signals radioactive elements to change their decay rates?
1 GWtech 2017-08-23
It is the origianal cause..sorry cant say more.
I am going write up if it works . Publish or perish and all that.
1 Conspiranut 2017-08-23
Crazy, isn't it?
1 GWtech 2017-08-23
I was looking up the sranford scientist Sturrock named and he also led this panel.
http://www.ufoevidence.org/topics/SturrockPanel.htm
1 justinsayin 2017-08-23
So far nothing OP. A 5.1 in Iraq, a 2 in Maine, a 3 in Alabama. Those don't count at all. What's your thought on this as of right now?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
By now fully closed it allears. Centered pan with a low heading. A continuation of this will conclude or test shortly into the planets re-adjusting / settling.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Nothing is breached, you just don't know how to interpret the data. From NOAA today: "Solar wind parameters reflected a nominal environment. Wind speed was steady at 350 km/s. Total magnetic field ranged between 3 and 6 nT while the Bz component did not drop lower than -3 nT. Phi angle was positive."
You're just trying to stall and hope an earthquake hits.
1 MrDonutSlayer 2017-08-23
I knew this guy was full of shit.
1 Twindude1 2017-08-23
he may not be full of shit, he may just be holding on to hope his model works.
This is kind of like that time the girl tells you how good it's gonna be when you get home and when you get home it's a quickie cause she's tired, but wait until tomorrow night. but it never comes, and neither do you.
if there is any correlation even his total bullshit posts will have some relevancy.
1 MrDonutSlayer 2017-08-23
Your metaphor, while creative, doesn't relate with me as I am a gay man LOL. But alrighty.
1 overtaxedoverworked 2017-08-23
Can you at least make an accurate prediction for when you'll make a post begging people for money?
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
Technobabble.
Nothing happened.
1 GetOutOfBox 2017-08-23
Aaand he was full of shit lul
1 JustAnotherStonerYo 2017-08-23
So he was?
1 Icharius 2017-08-23
you you!! you got me chewing my nails off! we had a minor earthquake here in my country!
1 slurmssmckenzie 2017-08-23
Sigh...i wanted to believe
1 GoodVSHero 2017-08-23
im probably wrong
but didnt he say August 25 before noon , and a USA time zone?
1 slurmssmckenzie 2017-08-23
You got the time right but he bet big it was nepal
1 tastygoods 2017-08-23
Where’s the thread at on the predicted timeline?
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-08-23
Hey this is about earthquakes, what about hurricanes? Any theory on that?
1 overtaxedoverworked 2017-08-23
... annnnd nothing.
I'm going to make my own prediction, /u/ParsingSol will soon make a post that their prediction was incorrect due to being too concerned with other matters and will beg people for 600k (again) to buy him a house.
1 tastygoods 2017-08-23
What’s that about the house?
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
He started a GoFundMe page so that he could work on earthquake research full time. His goal was $600k, and he said that he would use the money to buy a house. Seriously.
1 overtaxedoverworked 2017-08-23
Last time /u/parsingsol made a series of incorrect predictions they said it was due to their living situation and started a crowdsourcing fund on this sub for 600k so they could buy a house ...
1 awkybears 2017-08-23
Can confirm Vancouver is clear
1 Please_mom 2017-08-23
Lol
1 overtaxedoverworked 2017-08-23
Congratulations on extending your streak of completely incorrect predictions!
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
And so ends this giant ego trip.
1 MrsMadHatter04 2017-08-23
Personally, it takes alot off guts to be wrong and even more to keep trying despite doubts of others. Keep it up! It's interesting :)
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Agreed.
Kudos to him for trying.
1 overtaxedoverworked 2017-08-23
It takes even more guts to continuously be wrong then ask the sub to buy a house for him ...
1 astrofreak92 2017-08-23
It takes more guts to admit you're wrong and your model is nonsense, but he never will.
1 MrsMadHatter04 2017-08-23
I agree here, was willing to give him a shadow of a doubt...
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
Nothing happened, as predicted.
Will you maybe now consider that your model is wrong?
1 CG28 2017-08-23
In fairness he still has time.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
No, he said no later than today at 07:52 PST: https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6vbk20/the_worst_of_earthquakes_for_the_week_should_cone/
1 CG28 2017-08-23
Yup. I see that now. You're right, and he's definitely late.
1 lolmonsterlol 2017-08-23
He said when the breach closes
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Luckily that happened towards the end of the day on the 23rd: http://solarham.net/planetk.htm
1 vegetablestew 2017-08-23
He is probably going to keep changing reasons. He can do that because I didn't give concretely what he is tracking, so he can move that goalpost that he never established concretely anyways.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Yep. He was basically stalling for as long as possible in order to chance across an earthquake. I'm sure that he will be back soon with some vague, nebulous reasoning along with a sad story about his life.
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
So as of now 7:50 am pdt aug 23 2017 the lines seemed to have gotten close but then the sensor went out and then they may have diverged. http://archive.is/az9Ra
What do you think? Has the breach closed?
1 vegetablestew 2017-08-23
Solar wind very high. Schumann resonance very high.
But what does it have to do with earthquake predictions?
1 Zendm 2017-08-23
And what if you're wrong?
1 4702four11 2017-08-23
So you are just going to ignore this now that nothing has happened?
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
I was curious about all the space weather and how the Biz component works, so I tracked down a daily NOAA report. Good news! Everything is fine and quiet. Here's the report:
:Product: Report of Solar-Geophysical Activity :Issued: 2017 Aug 25 2200 UTC
Prepared jointly by the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA,
Space Weather Prediction Center and the U.S. Air Force.
Joint USAF/NOAA Solar Geophysical Activity Report and Forecast SDF Number 237 Issued at 2200Z on 25 Aug 2017
IA. Analysis of Solar Active Regions and Activity from 24/2100Z to 25/2100Z: Solar activity has been at low levels for the past 24 hours. The largest solar event of the period was a C5 event observed at 25/0727Z from Region 2672 (N07E05). There are currently 2 numbered sunspot regions on the disk. IB. Solar Activity Forecast: Solar activity is likely to be low with a slight chance for an M-class flare on days one and two (26 Aug, 27 Aug) and expected to be very low with a chance for a C-class flares and a slight chance for an M-class flare on day three (28 Aug).
IIA. Geophysical Activity Summary 24/2100Z to 25/2100Z: The geomagnetic field has been at quiet levels for the past 24 hours. Solar wind speed reached a peak of 388 km/s at 25/0136Z. Total IMF reached 6 nT at 25/2047Z. The maximum southward component of Bz reached -4 nT at 25/1039Z. Electrons greater than 2 MeV at geosynchronous orbit reached a peak level of 7705 pfu. IIB. Geophysical Activity Forecast: The geomagnetic field is expected to be at quiet levels on days one and two (26 Aug, 27 Aug) and quiet to unsettled levels on day three (28 Aug).
1 ironcladdan 2017-08-23
Can we all agree we wasted enough time on this guy?
1 pilla99 2017-08-23
Can we now agree we haven't
1 bbtruth1 2017-08-23
a broken clock is right twice a day
1 NUTS_STUCK_TO_LEG 2017-08-23
Is it safe to say that you did not, in fact, change the field of seismic prediction forever?
1 Please_mom 2017-08-23
Name checks out.
1 Sparky935 2017-08-23
So let me try to summarize and conjecture really quickly. Your saying suns heat/magnetic energy effects earths tectonic plates, alright I'll buy that seems more legit than dating things based upon how deep they are. Since I haven't heard anything about "the big one" in terms of earthquakes maybe the energy effected something else in our planetary system. Namely the atmosphere/ocean around the Gulf of Mexico, resulting in the rapid strengthening of Hurricane Harvey from a Cat-1 to a Cat 4 in less than 24 hours. And noticing your [final update] and noticing it coinciding with the relative weakening of the activity over the actual Gulf, maybe there is a correllation here. I want/am studying to become a surgeon not a seismologist or meterologist so ya know..
1 Schotel 2017-08-23
Nothing at all happened. Will you now admit that your preditions are simoly wrong?
1 justinsayin 2017-08-23
Your model pointed to Nepal.
Northwestern Nepal shares it's North Latitude with Houston. In fact, from the northernmost point in Nepal to the southermost point in Nepal, those latitudes are where this tropical storm is hitting.
1 justinsayin 2017-08-23
And now, here is a brand new tropical storm forming on the constructive margin that leads to the Caribbean plate.
https://imgur.com/a/p5ERC
1 astrofreak92 2017-08-23
This model has proved, once and for all, that lizardmen did 9/11.
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
So the breach is definitely closed..
Did anything big happen affer it did?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Two coronal holes earth facing. These keep winds elevated. Wait for -325km/s.
1 astrofreak92 2017-08-23
There will eventually be an earthquake somewhere and you'll claim credit. Give up dude. Find a new hobby.
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Ok.
Thanks.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Note: the incoming solar winds had another velocity shift today. (this resets the past data). 600km/s now.
So likely 6.0 mag range highest. No quakes 2 days. On the third day 6.0 mag intensity to resume.
1 MrsMadHatter04 2017-08-23
Does that account for Indonesia's 6.3 on Aug 31st?
1 azzazaz 2017-08-23
Remindme! 2 weeks
1 Zerophobe 2017-08-23
Whether it happens or not! Continue the work FAM. Goodluck.
1 crimsoncold 2017-08-23
OH. MY. GOD... It worked!
1 laxsterx 2017-08-23
No fucking way
1 ArchitectOfLove 2017-08-23
Not lying I'm all freaked out now
1 SnowMexico 2017-08-23
You were a bit late. But only by a few days. 8.0 Mexico
1 ludderz 2017-08-23
Just seen this: http://www.newsweek.com/mexico-earthquake-biggest-century-seismologist-aftershocks-661919
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Its falling backwards. Meaning decreasing in intensity. Were not full stopped yet. Hence the upto 48hr time frame.
My guess is 30hrs +/-
Maybe 18 for a full closing.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I attenpted to write the physicist that did his work for him. Thats as far as I've gone in terms of reaching out. :/
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
:)
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2017-08-23
Thanks! I'll check it out
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-08-23
You can go with whatever you want! You were going to go with that from the beginning buddy. Look how much time I saved myself!
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I just know/feel that data points to a serious incident. In what I think we should be looking for.
Im just a guy:)
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Technically its frequency vs past seismic scale in addition to most probable location to exhibit future intensity.
1 yokothespacewhale 2017-08-23
lol! See, to me this is genius, and it('s?) own coding?
1 i_LOSNAR_i 2017-08-23
great channel, been watching it for years
1 yokothespacewhale 2017-08-23
lol ok asshole... just trying to help. It seems like you must enjoy people not taking you seriously. Amazing how you can transcend modern geophysics when you can't even be bothered to remember or relearn grade school linguistic skills.
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
I think its a very simple concept really. What I don't get is they are literally arguing to not build a device by default of stating it doesnt work.
So can we check it?
1 ParsingSol 2017-08-23
Gotta hit it first:)
1 yokothespacewhale 2017-08-23
sorry man... i thought you downvoted and were actually insulting me.
1 MrNiceDude 2017-08-23
They are being skeptical. It will always exist in the scientific community for good reason.
1 Trieste02 2017-08-23
So when do you predict the next big earthquake based on this?
1 YoureAllRobots 2017-08-23
What is your accuracy in predicting earthquakes? His is way better than yours.
1 mazer_rack_em 2017-08-23
what's amazing about being wrong?
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-08-23
Link doesn't work for me
1 LongLiveTheWorld 2017-08-23
Exciting!
1 GoodVSHero 2017-08-23
im probably wrong
but didnt he say August 25 before noon , and a USA time zone?
1 Hatlessspider 2017-08-23
All you need is SUPER MALE VITALITY
1 vegetablestew 2017-08-23
He is probably going to keep changing reasons. He can do that because I didn't give concretely what he is tracking, so he can move that goalpost that he never established concretely anyways.
1 justinsayin 2017-08-23
And now, here is a brand new tropical storm forming on the constructive margin that leads to the Caribbean plate.
https://imgur.com/a/p5ERC
1 astrofreak92 2017-08-23
This model has proved, once and for all, that lizardmen did 9/11.