I remember reading about our ability to enhance or slow down hurricanes. The reason for this is we can send frequencies that vibrate certain particulates (metals and ions?) and align them with certain wavelengths, changing their tendencies. Idk it's been a while honestly so take it as you would an onion article or anything on Reddit without proof. I've noticed first hand many weather mitigation attempts (there are laws and bills that point to this) involving rain production, especially around airports, but I just don't know to what degree this hurricane shit is literally manmade.

What bothers me, too, is the hoard of theories, which sound uneducated, and to me, it seems that often the peddlers of these theories aren't informed or patient. However, sometimes it makes sense. But as Chomsky said: sometimes we want to believe it was a conspiracy because what we see is so unbelievable and unexplainable (why else would we keep using fossil fuels?).

I don't know, I can't know, maybe I won't know

So here's my issue with this statement. I've spent a lot of my adult life backpacking, traveling, and eventually settling down and being a contributing member of society (buzz buzz). I've read about actual cover-ups, seen many of our capabilities first hand, and been lucky enough to have two family members, one of which has been working for the government in the aerospace division and one who works in the private sector doing contract work. I've gotten a good feel and look at how the mechanisms operate.

What I can say with the least doubt: there are things that seem to be provoked, planned or produced by very illusive actors in the world. Sometimes, we know what we're told is a lie, sometimes we don't. But when we know it's a lie, we don't often know what is behind the lie.

For example, 9/11 theorists were many and their opinions were diverse. Some said it was Saudis. Some said it was Bush. Some claimed it was the Illuminati, some claimed it was the NWO's plans, and many more. The science that convinced me was the footages that defied that the senate committee found to be the case (for example, one was that there had to be an explosion in the trade centers to explain the speed and arc of certain debris caught on camera). That says to me we had an incomplete conclusion.

That could be because: -There were rushed politics to get the war machine out of the garage -Much like this administration, there were a bunch of dumb asses in power who didn't want to look bad -It was so intricate of a plot, we'd look foolish to reveal it -It was an inside job -Etc.

All of those are plausible. Depending on what set of facts one looks at and the conclusion they make, it'll seem that way. There was no conclusion based on all the publicly available facts. That's why so many damn conspiracists gained traction. When we don't know, anything is possible, and the more unbelievable something seems, the more malicious we think the intent to be.

Same with this hurricane stuff. Where's the evidence that the government or some private contractor has interacted with hurricanes and produced/accelerated them? I was lucky enough to get to see the creator of HAARP give a great speech on his tech and how it can be used to alter the weather to dramatic degrees. But to what degree and where the evidence of that actually is, I don't know.

All I'm saying is, could doesn't mean is. Possible doesn't mean happening.

For sure. I'm not arguing against man-made climate change. We're definitely and increasing the frequency and intensity of storms. House bills passed for weather mitigation are available for you to find on any website that grants you access to legislature. The creator of HAARP systems has spoken of what his technology does. There are many "HAARP farms" that people trip over saying it's there to control mind's--I don't think so, but I'm not certain (who is certain of anything?). We're very capable of changing jet streams, and weather. Heck, even countries like Russia and Iran did weather mitigation tests in the mid-late 1900's.

I just don't like the evidence I see, ya know? This Admin is the anti-establishment to the current establishment. Non-scientists filling roles of scientists, "former" bankers regulating banks, former industry workers regulating their own industry, anti-public education Devos gets appointed head of the edu dept, and the list goes on and on and on.

It's like the poison is seeping into individual roots of every agency (appointees making policy changes that create domino effects down the agency ladder). And in the midst of it, hardest flood the US has ever seen, Russia is fucking with AI, N. Korea is going bananas, the media here is literally excluding Kim Jong Un's statements that they're willing to put all their nukes on the table if the US backs the fuck off (I'm sure china supports that), and frankly, much more.

Right, but also in 2007 and 1998 we had two identical situations, plus, those states are in hurricane paths. I've seen footage and video, even pics of the eye of hurricane's being geometric.