The ultimate earthquake test is about to commence 8.0-9.0 magnitude range-
255 2017-09-06 by ParsingSol
(for those not staying tuned September 6, 2017 @ 14:00 UTC Major Spaceweather Event (X9.3 Flare) / CME(Updated)
The largest solar flare of the current solar cycle 24 was just observed around region 2673. The massive event measuring X9.3 peaked at 12:02 UTC Wednesday. A Type II radio emission with an estimated velocity of 1969 km/s was recorded. A bright coronal mass ejection (CME) is visible in the latest STEREO Ahead imagery and will likely be directed our way. More to follow once Earth facing LASCO coronagraph imagery becomes available. Aurora sky watchers may be in for a treat later this week.
ALERT: Type II Radio Emission Begin Time: 2017 Sep 06 1202 UTC Estimated Velocity: 1969 km/s
Description: Type II emissions occur in association with eruptions on the sun and typically indicate a coronal mass ejection is associated with a flare event.
SUMMARY: 10cm Radio Burst Begin Time: 2017 Sep 06 1154 UTC Maximum Time: 2017 Sep 06 1156 UTC End Time: 2017 Sep 06 1157 UTC Duration: 3 minutes Peak Flux: 12000 sfu
September 6, 2017 @ 09:25 UTC X2.2 Flare! (Updated) Region 2673 just produced a nice X2.2 solar flare at approximately 09:10 UTC (Sept 6). This is the first X-Class event to be detected since May 2015. The active region is still in a decent position for Earth directed eruptions. More updates will be provided should a coronal mass ejection (CME) be associated. More to follow. Image courtesy of SDO/AIA.
the X2 solar flare did not appear to generate a noteworthy solar flare.
850 - 950km/s 8.0 9.5+
750 - 850km/s 6.0-7.5+
650 - 750km/s 5.5 6.5+
550 - 650km/s 4.0 5.5+/-
450 - 550km/s 3.5 4.5+/-
New Ammo from mirth-red
I have taken the 1 min mean Bz Data from NASAs ACE (the DSCOVR data portal is relay cancer) and compared them to earthquakes. http://imgur.com/HP3ArCn Black points are earthquakes - Higher y-value -> greater magnitude The y-Value for Bz data-points is the intensity of your so called "breach". I assume the intensity of a "breach" is |Bt - Bz| The color shows the Bz value itself. The values have some shitty scale for comparison. The time frame is 01-01-17 to 08-28-17 There are really some intense earthquakes only days after a big "breeches" and high |Bz| values. Maybe there is a correlation. I didn't run any statistic tests, so my guess is so good as yours. And of course don't forget: "Correlation does not imply causation." At least this does not obviously contradict your theory. 2017, 2015-2016 2011
I had 2011 processed early. I am not giving a projected location this year.
The projection is for a 8.0-9.5 magnitude quake.
I've included all processed data showing the correlation between b's breaches and seismic events known to date. Most years showing a consistent relationship.
If you are good at statistical analysis we could use your help. Please pm me.
So ya.
I literally think 8.0 is easy this time around kids...
It's coming. A week tops- So 7day warning;
1202 comments
1 s_x_i 2017-09-06
The amount of analysis you do is admirable. I appreciate your posts man, keep it up!
1 DarthStem 2017-09-06
Do you have a region?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
If I had to guess
Japan.
1 ZiggyAdventures 2017-09-06
Does the sun facing impact area affect location? On a similiar note geomagnetic effects from flares/cmes have greater effect based on distance from equator. For instance the geomagnetic storms have alerts specifying 50 degrees off equator. Is there a correlation also attributed to Earthquakes?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I'm still working on the model myself. I imagine these are important factors. It may however be solely induction based. (With faults reacting at specific frequencies).
1 dancing-turtle 2017-09-06
I have no idea if there's anything to your space weather hypothesis, although I'll be interested in seeing how successful your predictions are. But you might want to incorporate more geology into your analysis. Convergent plate boundaries, the only areas likely to experience M = 8.0-9.5 quakes, are a pressure release mechanism for plate subduction, with roughly periodic occurrence at the century scale. Really big quakes are therefore more likely to occur along convergent boundaries that have been building up pressure without release in the recent past at the century scale.
Induction isn't so effective when the geological mechanism itself requires delay longer than a human lifetime between events. Even seismologists have been running into this problem, basing predictions on historical data when in many cases, the period of the disaster far exceeds the time of observation. There are no guarantees, but I'd be pretty surprised if the Japan Trench were to rupture again so soon after a 9.1 megathrust. That's a lot of pressure release. Other convergent boundaries in the area might be more vulnerable, though, like the Ryukyu trench to the south, which likewise hasn't produced a major megathrust quake in recent history, but geologically probably should at some point.
IF space weather is having some unrecognized effect on the timing of tectonic pressure release, certainly it must still be governed by whether there's significant pressure to release or not, right? Maybe if you can identify more vulnerable areas based on LACK of recent earthquakes despite favorable geological conditions, you can better predict when the solar flares are more dangerous, assuming you're on to something legit. Just a thought! (If there's any chance at all you could predict the timing of the Cascadia subduction zone megathrust that will sooner or later devastate the Pacific Northwest, that would be pretty amazing, because it's going to be rough whenever it happens...)
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Thats my initial thoughts. Devise probability algorithm of known seismology. Then use space weatgwr as a putch regulator. Which sets the pace of the assessment.
Use the past data known data sets to determine the liklihood of a future event.
1 dancing-turtle 2017-09-06
Well, you've definitely got my attention. First 8+ of 2017 under 36 hours after your post. Ridiculous luck, or scientific breakthrough?
I'd argue it demonstrates my point to an extent, too (even though that's less exciting! just wanted to point it out.) Check out the location of this earthquake compared to previously recorded earthquakes near Mexico. This is a spot that hasn't released stress in awhile. Smaller scale than the Japan Trench example from last night -- smaller quake with necessarily more limited geographic extent of the thrust, vs. the massive rupture of the 2011 Tohoku quake. But the same principle applies. Places that are likely to experience megathrusts but haven't in awhile are ticking timebombs. Sumatra and the eastern coast of Japan along the Japan Trench are two of the safest earthquake zones in the Pacific Ring of Fire right now. Just thought that would be useful to work into your model.
(Incidentally, Cascadia scares the crap out of me because of the relative rarity of 6.0+-ish quakes since the ~9 in 1700. Those plates are LOCKED. I'm pretty worried that with that amount of stress, it could be a pretty precarious situation down -- any disturbance might blow the whole thing without warning, I figure...)
1 dwizzle36 2017-09-06
Check out Dutchsinse if you want to see accurate EQ forecasts on a daily basis. His methods are repeatable, easy to see, and accurate.
1 under_thesun 2017-09-06
what is your thought on the electric universe theory
1 hineysight 2017-09-06
So it's charging/moving our core? I'm 5
1 temporaldimension 2017-09-06
Dang you don't play around.
1 BareknuckleCagefight 2017-09-06
Why do you have to guess? How accurate have your past predictions been?
1 WaitTilUSeeMyDick 2017-09-06
Yeah your account isn't sketchy at all...
2 years. 3 posts. 650 post karma with 60 upvotes combined. 7k comment karma. Active 4 months ago...
You really want to attack the messenger?
1 Generic_On_Reddit 2017-09-06
Is there a point to your comment?
1 BareknuckleCagefight 2017-09-06
You know, some people like to clear out their shit so others can't rifle through it :)
1 NXTChampion 2017-09-06
Cowarss.
1 Friday_The_13th 2017-09-06
Tell it to /u/HanAssholeSolo and /u/stonetear
1 StanGibson18 2017-09-06
I'm not deleting shit.
1 Friday_The_13th 2017-09-06
You the man, Ken!
1 Guerrilla_Time 2017-09-06
Checking someones comment history for no reason is sketchy...
So what's with this sub and sleuthing though peoples comment history before replying to them? It's like you got to see if they are on your side or not before you respond.
1 GerkDentley 2017-09-06
It seems like literally any combination of age and post frequency is suspect if you don't like what someone is saying.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
They havent.
1 binauralbeatz 2017-09-06
And most people in here aren't even bothering calling him out on it.
1 stinger_six 2017-09-06
I believe you bro I just hope San Diego doesn't get hit
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Honestly I'd expect a 6.0 in California if a 8.5 mag range strikes
Also been worried about Idaho? (More so emotionally then statistically)... they are active but if you were to expect an 8.0-9.5 eq I'd assess:
Japan, Nepal, Chile, New Zealand, Philippians, Tonga, Mexico city, or Turkey.
To me these are the most typical regions to display this Intensity.
I imagine Japan's east coast Namie area upto Fukushima offshore will have a +8.0
1 stinger_six 2017-09-06
well in any event I believe you and won't mock you. people have been ripping me apart over the September 23 warnings but it is what is. shit is going down
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Honestly. I'm not perfect. I get a lot of opposition. I do not regret this post in the slightest.
:)
1 stinger_six 2017-09-06
we appreciate your hard work and trying to warn us. stay safe bro
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-09-06
Good for you, do not let them taunt you.
I love when you post, I may not understand stuff but I like it :)
1 DestroyBabylonSystem 2017-09-06
Hi u/ParsingSol you made a prediction in your last one or two, poss. three posts here specifically regarding New Zealand.
What came of that prediction? Did it occur off the coast, deeper down or to a lesser degree than predicted or not at all?
Just asking as I live there/here/in NZ and didn't discern or recall anything from around the time you indicated and had been meaning to ask you.
1 SandMonsterSays 2017-09-06
Ok so I'm a new sub at this subreddit so I have a question. What are the September 23 warnings?
1 stinger_six 2017-09-06
Judgement Day.
This is kind of long, but every second of this video is important https://youtu.be/xn_l2yS6H2o
1 SandMonsterSays 2017-09-06
Oh I see. Thank you for the information.
1 TheCrazyChristian 2017-09-06
From Aug 21, the day of the Eclipse:
The eclipse ended in the Atlantic where Harvey began
The massive solar flare/CME the other day that caused this 8.0 subduction zone quake is probably just the beginning of more to come since it's still so early
Yellowstone trembling's
Multiple hurricanes including one massive super one within one week
7 years from now another Solar eclipse goes across America forming an "X"
What is next I wonder ???
All just the beginning of birth pains. The end times show hasn't even begun to start yet. Biblical prophecy fulfillment is about to be continued to be fulfilled to it's finale, probably in less than 2 weeks =O)
Crazy times we live in. Truth is indeed stranger than fiction.
1 SurroundedByMachines 2017-09-06
Did you know that Jesus, from the Bible you just quoted, liked to eat ass?
1 WalterMatthau 2017-09-06
Well, at least your username is accurate.
1 auh_soj 2017-09-06
Sept 23rd?
1 Telekinetic_Otter 2017-09-06
You're bat-shit
1 bombsaway1979 2017-09-06
Bro, didn't you just predict a 8.0 a week or two ago, and nothing happened? How is this any different? Your model clearly isn't 100% figured out yet....maybe chill with the scare mongering?
1 Demty 2017-09-06
Who cares if he's not always right. At least he's trying and he's got a lot of posts here that were accurate. He's not scaremongering. If his predictions are even 30% correct and there's a corelation between the flares and quakes then he is leading the charge to start up new studies that can save countless lives. This dude is trying. Let him entertain us with some shit that ain't politics for once.
1 BernieBalloonHair 2017-09-06
He's larping. The people who buy into this hysteria us what's ridiculous
1 Demty 2017-09-06
4chan larps. This dude is legit.
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
What makes you think he's legit? Has he ever made a correct prediction?
1 Demty 2017-09-06
2 month old account. Nuff said.
1 zargusplow 2017-09-06
Why does it matter how old the account is? He's asking a question.
1 bombsaway1979 2017-09-06
All the fat cats in the Big Earthquake-Predicting Industry don't want us to know the truth!
1 Demty 2017-09-06
Accepting apologies now.
1 zargusplow 2017-09-06
The question, which you never answered, was perfectly apt. You put blind faith in something, and it turned out at least semi-true. Y was true, and X was true, but whether X=Y is yet to be seen. He listed a half dozen locations near fault lines. I'm not saying he was incorrect, maybe he is onto something, maybe it was luck. I simply want proof before I believe something.
1 Demty 2017-09-06
"I want to believe"
1 WalterMatthau 2017-09-06
Lol you're a junkie, that explains so much.
1 Demty 2017-09-06
Bold statement.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I killed my other account for personal reasons. Ive been here since oct 2016.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Yes. Several. Ive accurately assessed quakes in japan nepal new mexico california canada alaska phillipeans newzealand and chile. Many within 3000km of the epicentre. Within .1-.4 of the expected magnitude.
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
Do you have any links to those past threads or something? I've literally only ever see you be incorrect or vaguely close, which you then espouse as a huge victory.
1 pants_full_of_pants 2017-09-06
So uh... How bout now?
1 Lord_of_hosts 2017-09-06
One at least.
1 thoymas 2017-09-06
https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/906019136815251456 yep
1 Bu5hyy 2017-09-06
Welcome to the day he was correct.
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
Depends on how you define correct, tbh. He predicted an 8.3 or higher in Japan or Nepal. There was an 8.1 in Mexico. idk
1 op-return 2017-09-06
Just admit you were wrong.
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
As I said elsewhere, I do admit that I'm more impressed than I was at first. I didn't realize how few 8.0+ earthquakes there have been in the last century. Although I'm not convinced that this isn't a case of a stopped watching being right twice a day (given that all the other prediction I've seen from him have failed), I'm interested to hear his next prediction.
1 WalterMatthau 2017-09-06
Lol he was wildly and completely incorrect. Japan isn't close to Mexico. It scares me that you people could potentially be parents.
1 Bu5hyy 2017-09-06
He did say it could be a number of places, Mexico included.
How do you expect him to pinpoint the exact place?
1 MusicMole 2017-09-06
Mexico city.
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
....was not his prediction, but okay.
1 MusicMole 2017-09-06
Read his other comments.
1 Demty 2017-09-06
He just made one.
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
Wrong location, but I am impressed he got the magnitude right.
1 Demty 2017-09-06
Also 1 month old account? Please.
1 hineysight 2017-09-06
Interested if there is a revision to your opinion now that we just had a 8.0
1 Zerophobe 2017-09-06
Newfags who don't shit about this sub LUL
1 Demty 2017-09-06
Still think he's larping?
1 fd40 2017-09-06
amen. its unreal how much people are trying to spread hate for him. he isn't charging any money, simply posting a theory of his every now and then for our potential benefit. Like fuck this guy for not being a 100% accurate earthquake predictor, at least he's spending his time working on something to help people rather than sitting on his ass shitting on others who try
1 Demty 2017-09-06
Exactly. Well said.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Yep. Sometimes I fail. Miserably. This is a good test to see full validity in a poc. All I can say is we dont have x9.3 flares with partially earth directed cme's everyday. So its cool to at least mention the idea they may affect our planets constant order of operations?
1 bombsaway1979 2017-09-06
I think it's awesome you're looking at these correlations and trying to make sense of them, 100% support your work....I just think it hurts your cause when you post stuff like this and then it doesn't happen. I can appreciate that you're trying to bring attention to your ideas, but you're on a conspiracy board where ppl WANT to believe the world is gonna end soon for whatever reason...I dunno. Chicken-little-effect. Maybe try to word your posts a bit more scientifically....some more 'maybes' and 'we'd expects' may go farther to increase your credibility.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Agreed. I will make an effort to work on it.
Honestly been hitting rough patches in and out for a bit there. Technically I am having a relatively good day yoday though. So hope it improves my accuracy. Jokes aside. This is an amazing event. Hopefuly we see a correlating quake. While its not conclusive proof. Its a hell of a way to prove im on to something. 1 week. Probably gonna stop responding to comments soon. Really said all that I think I can until more updates take place.
1 RosiBlossom 2017-09-06
You did it.
1 WHYHRUDOINDAT 2017-09-06
I'm sure your not super happy to be right about something like this. At least it's for science. Keep it up man. Lets hope people are safe.
1 Fijiwater69 2017-09-06
and now?
1 BlueHenTarHeel 2017-09-06
Not this time. Well done and keep up the great work.
1 WalterMatthau 2017-09-06
I think that should read "Regularly I fail." You're a charlatan.
1 PIPSticks01 2017-09-06
got 8.2 earthquake minutes ago on Mexico dude. :/
1 DAY_OF_THEE_ROPE 2017-09-06
1 Glimmerron 2017-09-06
Lol. Check the news now
1 sweaty_clitoris 2017-09-06
This comment did not age well.
1 WalterMatthau 2017-09-06
Why? Because yo morons think Japan is close to Mexico? If you walk around all day saying it's going to rain, it doesn't mean you predicted the rain when it happens.
1 l---------l 2017-09-06
how do you feel now...?
1 goobly_goo 2017-09-06
How do you feel now?
1 bombsaway1979 2017-09-06
Happy for the dude!
1 LeftStep22 2017-09-06
are you a wizard?
1 MindWarfare 2017-09-06
Good call - http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-41197831
How are you predicting location? Those places are known to get larger sized earthquakes. If we know there is a correlation between these solar flare events, couldn't anyone just watch for a large flare and predict an earthquake in these prone regions? It's a pretty big spread location wise.
1 jmoc_98 2017-09-06
Wooh! Mexico just had an earthquake of 8.0
1 Ribss 2017-09-06
You literally predicted an 8.0 earthquake would hit Mexico and it fucking did. You should share your research with the USGS.
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
Why would you have to guess?
I thought you had a model that can predit location and magnitude.
Why guess?
1 Demty 2017-09-06
He's got a solid hypothesis that isn't always right, so yes he will guess until he gains momentum until his predictions become more accurate. It takes balls to make such bold predictions and putting his reputation on the line again and again.
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
Explain this "solid hypothesis" because he certainly cannot.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Thats an outright lie. This user continually blasts my posts completely ignoring the entire subreddit and work weve put into this project. The yser is well aware of our sub. Goals and theory.
1 Demty 2017-09-06
Solar flares connected to earthquakes. What's the top post in conspiracy this morning?
1 JoeyBananas79 2017-09-06
Yeah, anonymously posting guesses that are always wrong on a conspiracy subreddit is a real risk to his already fine reputation
1 Demty 2017-09-06
Always wrong huh?
1 JoeyBananas79 2017-09-06
Would you like me to edit it "wrong 99% of the time"?
Enjoy it, you'll have to wait decade before he accidentally gets anything "right" again.
1 tommytwotats 2017-09-06
You just described every weather forecaster ever. Its all guessing.
1 BernieBalloonHair 2017-09-06
No the fuck it's not
1 L0RENZ0V0NMATTERH0RN 2017-09-06
Its educated guessing really. Meteorologists have a decent understanding of the the way weather works, but their forecasts are pretty much guesses until about 2-3 days out.
1 versusgorilla 2017-09-06
It's prediction, not guessing, based on a set of data. They're not going, "Gee, I guess snow tomorrow because it's winter and it's cold?"
They're looking at cold fronts compared to warm fronts, looking at where the fronts originated, looking at what historically weather patterns have done, they're looking at weather we're currently having and making predictions based on all of that. Modern meteorologists also use tons of computer driven models to predict the weather and more often than not, they're right.
Sometimes they're wrong and we get less rain than predicted, or it rains instead of snows, temperature can fluctuate within the range they give and change the weather slightly, storms can move a bit and take you out of their range.
But more often than not, they're correct.
What we're dealing with here, is someone who's constantly predicting things that don't happen most of the time, and even the times he's been "right", he's still been off by a bunch.
His predictions aren't good or working, he's guessing based on a model that clearly isn't as accurate as he claims.
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
No
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I have basic ideas how to use data to our advantage. Im attempting to use those ideas with known coding techniques to create a model. My posts are merely a concept of that concept.
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
You are making claims stating something js definetly going to happen and then it doesn't happen.
You have no credibility left.
1 worktogether 2017-09-06
He has no credibility anyway, so nothing to lose but everything to gain
Let's say he get lucky and guesses right he will gain credibility does a second time maybe Internet fandom
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Ive guessed right enough to be approached by some very impressive users. (will update when I know more).
Balls in their court. ;)
1 RaiderRush2112 2017-09-06
This guy ain't bluffin
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Ok.
1 Skrittext 2017-09-06
Too bad it happened
1 DL757 2017-09-06
:thinking:
1 lsaz 2017-09-06
Dude, check OP history he has claimed a "big earthquake" will happen every week in the last 4 months he was bound to be right at least once.
1 Drangleic_Soldier 2017-09-06
How's that humble pie tasting?
1 hineysight 2017-09-06
Trolls don't like humble pie.
1 DL757 2017-09-06
:thinking:
1 Ragnarokcometh 2017-09-06
The radio blackout was over south Western Asia, east India.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Nepal had a 7.8 in 2015 on april 29th. On april 25th 2015 a cme and m class event occured.
Nepal and japan are the two regions ive seen capable of producing this magnitude of event, following this type of solar activity.
1 Ragnarokcometh 2017-09-06
The lastest radio blackout areas are over Africa ATM. We just had another M-flare too...going to be interesting. Btw have you read this article? http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/31/solar-flare-sun-touches-our-psyche/ ....not only earthquakes to worry about, but the personal scale. They're might be a terrorist attack or false flag soon. Full moon again tonight also. Shit crazy y'all.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Another x-1.3 today.
1 Slobberz2112 2017-09-06
thats really not good..
1 TruthHammerOfJustice 2017-09-06
8.0 earth quake of the cost of Mexico...
1 MadCatzPlayer2 2017-09-06
Wrong, Southern Mexico.
1 hurtsdonut_ 2017-09-06
Looks like Mexico.
1 RagingAgainst 2017-09-06
Well it hit the pacific. Can you elaborate on your findings!?
1 Ragnarokcometh 2017-09-06
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/08/mexico-struck-by-earthquake-of-magnitude-8-tsunami-possible-usgs.html
1 Ragnarokcometh 2017-09-06
Tsunami confirmed http://tsunami.gov/events/PHEB/2017/09/08/17251000/4/WEPA40/WEPA40.txt
1 imGnarly 2017-09-06
Oh man, if only you had said Mexico.
1 averagejoe918 2017-09-06
Wow I was just checking this sub to see if there was a post yet about the huge flare. Sure enough, there is. Thanks ParsingSol. You get a lot of flak but I'm rooting for you as well as many others I'm sure.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I really shouldn't have done eclipse based posts Cme's I'm Good at; )
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
No you arent.
1 BernieBalloonHair 2017-09-06
Yeah you tried to cash in on all that hype surrounding the eclipse but instead you just proved yourself a fool.
1 der_titan 2017-09-06
Wait... You're rooting for a devastating earthquake to hit eastern Japan, just so some random hack finally hits a bullseye with his 'model' ? Not for nothing, that sounds like a dick statement.
1 averagejoe918 2017-09-06
What's your problem, buddy? I didn't say that at all. I'm rooting for his work, his methods, I'm rooting for the guy who spends his time in pursuit of advancing the field of science and increasing our understanding of the way things work.
Personally I think he is on to something with his theory about solar activity relating to seism
1 bamboobooks 2017-09-06
If he's right it means we can save a few million lives in the future with his methods
1 der_titan 2017-09-06
As op wrote, correlation doesn't imply causation, but op hasn't even shown correlation. Given that there are tens of thousands of earthquakes a year, and plenty of data, good science would dictate proving there's a positive relationship E would be a key first step.
1 tjswooshmenzada 2017-09-06
Ahh thank you. I've been waiting on your post. Good stuff.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I will clean it up soon. Just a placeholder It's early lol
1 Loud_Volume 2017-09-06
Great work parsing! A lot of people give you flak but you're doing something they aren't, and that's actually trying something and improving upon it.
Keep it up! I enjoy reading these
1 fe3lg0odhit 2017-09-06
Better to be criticized for trying to create something genuine than complimented for being average.
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
Another predition that will result in nothing
1 WestCoastHippy 2017-09-06
Parsing Sol is right more often than not and shows his work.
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
He has never been right
1 WestCoastHippy 2017-09-06
No, you've been following his posts?
Seems to me he has a solid premise, solid methodology, solid results, shows his work... what am I missing?
1 Etoiles_mortant 2017-09-06
He has never provided any data or formulas for his work, neither has he shown a list of predictions and success ratings.
Case in point, if he had a formula it would have either been extremely easy to explain why the "largest earthquake of 16-17" didn't happen. He would also have been able to explain what was changed this time, making his "largest earthquake of the decade" post valid.
His only real successes are earthquakes bellow 5.0 on highly energetic region. A user replied to one of his posts with random predictions and got an equivalent ratio of correct outcomes.
On the other side, op has tried to crowdfund his work but then it emerged that he wanted the money to get married which prompted him to create another account.
1 WestCoastHippy 2017-09-06
Vague assertions have turned into actual content!
1 ChadluvsZion 2017-09-06
That's not vague assertions. Anyone can say there will be an earthquake in a hot zone and will eventually get it right.
1 WestCoastHippy 2017-09-06
I meant the initial assertions against the OP, by schotel, were vague. The assertions then went from vague to actual content, provided by Etoiles_mortant.
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
Quote a couple of his correct predictions.
Explain his hypothesis and methology.
Have you not noticed that he has actually never explain what his hypothesis is and how he comes to his conclusions?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Not this one-
1 Blakwulf 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
I'll take that bet.
1 RemindMeBot 2017-09-06
I will be messaging you on 2017-09-13 19:54:13 UTC to remind you of this link.
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
1 datums 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
I'll take that bet.
1 Blakwulf 2017-09-06
Hey now, don't turn this into a gambling problem!
1 Ginjoo 2017-09-06
I literally bet a guy at work 100$ on one of his predictions and lost.... Fucking sucker born every minute...
1 Blakwulf 2017-09-06
Fortunately i don't have $100.
1 Imsomniland 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 Snipe812 2017-09-06
Time to pay up
1 datums 2017-09-06
Hmm
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I assure you. 7 days. An 8.0+ on earth.
1 Blakwulf 2017-09-06
OK.
1 SudenlyLochNess 2017-09-06
It happened, Cocos plate and carribean in Mexico. It was an 8.0 he's a fucking wizard
1 Kiwiteepee 2017-09-06
Look at his post history, he says this shit every 5-10 days. He's bound to be right eventually
1 SudenlyLochNess 2017-09-06
This is different because the solar flare he's referring to was a large one, which is triggering a major aurora.
Could be correlation, could be a breakthrough in earthquake science.
1 ChadluvsZion 2017-09-06
Didn't you do that with the last post? You were confident that it was going to be the strongest quake of the year in 7 days from that post.
What happen? Why not update about why the prediction was wrong. Explain why your method will be correct this time since you are taking bets on it.
1 BernieBalloonHair 2017-09-06
Right. He offers zero transparency on his "model" that's he developed and he's been wrong with just about every prediction that he's made. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if he's a psyop to test just how wrong somebody can be and still be taken as credible by gullible people
1 Infiniteexpression 2017-09-06
How do you feel now?
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
He, and I'm being serious, said the reason that it didn't happen last time was due to time dilation.
1 Nanderson423 2017-09-06
...That doesn't even make sense.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
The exact term doesn't. It was a metaphore. Meaning the bz breach was longer then expected. Its been well articulated to users over the year that this overlapse of time lowers the expected magnitude of an earthquake.
I also feel the solar weather heightened the intensity of hurricane harvey. You can learn more about these instances and how they effect the earth in the video in the third link above. (Labled: more on this event).
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I made a foolish mistake by weighing in on the theory an eclipse holds more value then it did. I ooenly admit that.
This is an xclass event. A 9.3 with an associated cme and earth bound componet.
Two entirely different things. This event dorectly following my initial theory. Which has fairly little to do woth themose posts and their direction. Time will tell in the end. All im asking is for a week. You have to live it anyways. So maybe consider that if a quake occurs it may not be as coincidental as seismologists want you to bekieve. Which opens the door to a new advanced earthquake 'prediction' platform.
So we win if we win. You win if I lose. Kk
:)
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Why do you keep acting like everyone means the eclipse prediction when they mean your bullshit about the 'bz breach' or whatever term you were misusing
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
This is not my words so I cant address your question. Please dont play word games and have a normal conversation. Yes I feel the bz breach signifys when a quake will occur. Yes m class activity with 780km/s wonds should show activity. No not 8.0 activity. That was an eclipse multiplier. The 6.3 we saw was what we should have been expecting. Im a human. I get excoted and over assess things at times. Its called an exageration.
Me claming an 8.0 this test to me is beong conservative. I expect an 8.3- 9.0+- this will be due to the x class activity. No eclipse or multiplier involved.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
and when nothing happens will you then admit you were wrong and have no idea what youre doing, or will you just brush it off as a miscalculation even though your location and magnitude will be nowhwre near.
Even if one does occur, you have no evidence that your model predicted it, your assertions will just be post hoc ergo propter hoc
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I disagree. Read the thread carefully enough and you will see a more exact location is given. As well as an expected seismic intensity value. Depth and general vicinity.
My model has no relevance to this post. Its computational and fully based on data. Data points which are provided within the thread. Which are inarguable. As they are factual events recorded in past history.
What I am capable of is demonstrating the model per human capacity. I.e. its based on my personal observations, thoughts, and discovery.
The model would be a more consostent approach to the attempts I make as a single dedicated user.
If ive ever impressed anyone. Just imagine what the nodel might be capable of...
Its tests like these that will show its full validity. Xclass is the highest range of flaring known to man.
So it makes my last test literay pail by comparison. 6 more days man. Thats all I ask.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
You mean you 'guessing' Japan. I suspect if a smaller quake happens we'll see a very liberal location ring just so you look half right. You still havent published how you picked that spot in particular, although what a suprise its in the pacific rim.
Then publish the calculations
Why havent you then?
You havent, because your predictions arent any good
Just like the last one.
The sooner you admit to being a snake oil salesman the sooner you can stop wasting everyones time
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
If thats what you feel this is. (wasting time). Then please do stop wasting it by responding to my posts.
I take my time and posts seriously. Maybe someday you will too. Until then please stop wasting my time. Ty.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
No you really dont
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Yes I really do.
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Dude!!!! Fucking seeing this! You nailed it!
1 tatadoo 2017-09-06
Part of me absolutely hates that the prediction was correct; I cannot imagine the hardship some people are facing. The other side of me is ecstatic that the model had more evidence. Not everyday we get a 8.1 magnitude earthquake.
Me is so conflicted.
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Yeah I don't view this as a positive that people may be hurt by a natural disaster. I'm hoping this is something that may potentially lead to predicting these and in turn helping to minimize possible deaths. I get where you are coming from.
1 honestlyimeanreally 2017-09-06
Broken clock right twice a day?
Or Nostradamus?
More news at 11.
1 optiglitch 2017-09-06
You should eat you're hat now
1 dabadguycr 2017-09-06
You just got fucking owned.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
No i didnt.
1 DADDYDICKFOUNTAIN 2017-09-06
8.0 in mexico just like he said here we go boys
1 Pomandres 2017-09-06
Earthquake wizard zapped ur ass dude
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Still no
1 Pomandres 2017-09-06
You more salty than that earthquake's tsunami.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Did this sub just learn a new word today or something
1 windtonner 2017-09-06
Well, this post didn't age well. How do you feel now troll?
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Fine?
1 RoadHouseSwayzeTrain 2017-09-06
So...a magnitude 8 hit mexico earlier...
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
I thought this prediction had to do with the Bz value. You said: "So if you ever wanted confirmation of the legitimacy of what ive been doing. It's about to come as this breach comes to an end. (Within -12 hours of the breach closing)."
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Thats the point. The bz was breached for 2 whole days. It greatly complicatess the test. Let alone I was locked into my initial eclipse vector.
At least I take my errors into account and address them. I am not quottong because I found a single flaw calm it personal or erroneous. Its merely a moot point.
1 kit8642 2017-09-06
Glad you're here, forget these nay-sayer, keep doing you.
1 SmellyCat1776 2017-09-06
Remindme! 7 days
1 logga 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
http://archive.is/adCx7
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Look. I admit I fail. So just know I will permalink this when I succeed as well...
Thats just immature. But I understand your intent. So best of luck.
1 DADDYDICKFOUNTAIN 2017-09-06
GUIDE US WISE ONE
1 fearoffearof 2017-09-06
Remind me! 6 days
You're assuring us! By constantly predicting big earthquakes, you are bound to be a broken clock at least once in the future. Especially with big windows.
But, it will be correlative and not causitive, and there is a huge difference. So, to prove your self and your model, you need to be right about more details than a big earthquake. You're gonna have to call the area and the magnitude.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
8.3 east fukushima namie predecture. Associated tsunami. Wave heights of 2.3 meters. Depth 33km-56km
Or
8.2 Nepal (central Himalayan ridge). Depth 28km-90km
1 fearoffearof 2017-09-06
Are you aware that earthquakes occur constantly all over the world? Have you considered attempting to predict some of these smaller ones that always happen?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I have done some smaller quakes when testing zones.
To me its much easier to pair large solar events to large seismic events. My impression is start big and work toward smaller events. That way we arent accounting for all seismic event scenarios. More effectively focusing on the direct solar influencing.
1 fearoffearof 2017-09-06
Way off, and like I said, when the little boy keeps crying wolf, eventually there will be wolves. But that doesn't mean he caused the wolves to come or predicted they would come. He simply knew they came, so if he kept saying they would come, eventually he would look correct.
Anyway, in order to claim this, you need to prove it mathematically then repeat it. Maybe with smaller ones.
Because you reiterated Japan and Nepal, so you're still wrong and this is still not in any way proved.
Prove me wrong~
1 dotobird 2017-09-06
Your hairy schlong will be glorified on Reddit
1 Blakwulf 2017-09-06
How did you know it was hairy?
1 dotobird 2017-09-06
clairevoyance
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Its a real bet. Are you also taking it?
1 therealtheremin 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 Snipe812 2017-09-06
Time to pay up
1 WayneTrainPainTrain 2017-09-06
Pay up
1 Kladinov 2017-09-06
You lost son.
1 RandomUsername232323 2017-09-06
You just lost.
1 Smokin-Okie 2017-09-06
You shouldn't have taken that bet...
1 no_flex 2017-09-06
You can turn off that reminder now....
1 sweaty_clitoris 2017-09-06
I'll remind you earlier.
1 shark2pus 2017-09-06
You lost the bet.
1 Djr1423 2017-09-06
Pay up
1 Blakwulf 2017-09-06
Wrong region, but right time frame.
1 Djr1423 2017-09-06
exactly, right time frame
1 Th3_Admiral 2017-09-06
...but you said that last time. You were super confident about the last one and even gave a very specific time frame, location, and magnitude. It was supposed to be the biggest earthquake of the 2016-2017 season. And then nothing, not even a small rumble. At what point does this become the boy who cried wolf?
1 datums 2017-09-06
More of a Chicken Little.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
This is a Cme and flare. (Not an eclipse).
8.0 in 7days.
Loser does an /r/gonewild post. Deal? So if I am right. You post on gonewild- If you are right I post...
Deal?
1 Th3_Admiral 2017-09-06
Not your eclipse post (that was also wrong) but the massive quake you predicted before that when the last gap closed, or whatever the correct term is. The one where you said it would be "The largest quake of 2016-2017".
I'm not taking any bets with you because I have as much faith of you following through with it as I do with you admitting you are making this all up as you go. Plus, no one wants to see my hairy schlong.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Look man, To me this is progressional. Call it a failure. Sure...
'Moving on': its 'next week', that's not looking to good... Ok?
I'm absolutely not good at this. However, I'd argue (along with others) that I'm better at it, then you've ever taken me for.
1 Th3_Admiral 2017-09-06
I've been watching these predictions for a while because I was actually really interested in it at first. But I still haven't seen anything to convince me there is merit to your theory. And the fact that you continue to sell every single prediction as if it is 100% guaranteed this time but then go on to admit you haven't worked out certain parts of the model or really even know exactly what you are doing just doesn't sit right with me.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
What I do is really move forward in general. I posted the latest backed data results.
I'm more on track with this post then my latest. This is months old formula. Safe territory. I feel confident in this post.
My last one was a failure. I don't argue that. I am learning just as much as anybody else my friend. Yet this is a huge event. Last week was moderately mild by comparison.
1 Th3_Admiral 2017-09-06
Hey, if this one turns out to be right it will certainly help to win me back around. But that means in the next seven days there needs to be an 8.0 in either Japan or the East Coast. Not a 6.0 in India, not a 4.0 in Hawaii, and not a hurricane in the Atlantic.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Agreed. 8.0+ for pickup!
1 Miserable_Fuck 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 FriedBizkit 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 PhealGood 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 zkantalope 2017-09-06
Damn
1 fnordfnordfnordfnord 2017-09-06
You called it.
1 Kissuiso 2017-09-06
Haha nice
1 dirklejerk 2017-09-06
Suh dude
1 mayavision 2017-09-06
Ooh shit
1 StanTheRebel 2017-09-06
It's happening!
1 xyatropos 2017-09-06
8 in Mexico count?
1 dalik 2017-09-06
Probably not because the location isn't spot on.
1 MyDadDidntPullOut 2017-09-06
Has he won you back around yet ?
1 Th3_Admiral 2017-09-06
He was way off on the location but dead on with the magnitude, so that's enough for at least partial credit and I'll definitely give the theory another chance! I'd love to hear a layman's explanation of how he determined the location this time and how the actual results will affect his calculations.
1 MyDadDidntPullOut 2017-09-06
I was just joking my friend, though I agree it does sound interesting to look into.
1 Th3_Admiral 2017-09-06
I woke up this morning to a dozen comments all saying "Told ya so!" So I figured I should probably respond to at least one of them. Anyway, I'll be following this a bit closer now. Until he actually gives some decent explanations of his models though I'm going to continue to be skeptical.
1 MyDadDidntPullOut 2017-09-06
That's the way to live! Question Everything!!!!
1 harrypartridge2 2017-09-06
Fuck yes, my man!
1 notSherrif_realLife 2017-09-06
Looks like you're winning over some of the doubters today...
1 Demty 2017-09-06
Listen not to the terds man. Your doing excellent work and sticking your neck out there. Your wrong the next 10 times I'm still interested in what you have to say. Your putting in hours and trying to change the world for the better. I don't know ANY names in this sub except you. You stick out(in a good way) and keep doing your thing! The basement dwellers can talk all the shit they want, shouldn't phase you bra.
1 TheDaisyCutter 2017-09-06
you need "failure" to succeed and progress. Keep it up.
I see what you're doing, and sometimes it's panning out. You have some tweaking to do, or, your LARPing game is solid lol.
I wonder how the keyboard warriors are making out with their experiments ? But im sure trying the mayo their mom bought a few months ago will work out just fine for them.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I wanna see a statician run the data. To hell with my personal performance. 2017 data is done. 2015 and 2011. All available above. If there is a high level of correlations thats all we need to begin imaging / modeling. Poc is delivered. These posts are like a demo. Chasong proof it works, and can be used to our advantages. So its a big deal. I just try my best.
1 TheDaisyCutter 2017-09-06
Again... Thanks for that. 99 percent on here wouldnt even attempt.
1 CelineHagbard 2017-09-06
Have you ever provided your data?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
There is a wealth of data within the thread. As well as at /r/parsingsol
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
So... no?
1 arcticfox23 2017-09-06
Upvote!
Oh nevermind then
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
At least im honest. I have done some pretty good work over the year. You all seem to judge me by my most recent failures. Unfortunently, I remember both states of being.
1 arcticfox23 2017-09-06
I'm just giving you a hard time. Better to try and fail than not try at all. So long as you keep learning from any failures. Keep it up
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Thats what im pretty much trying.
The entirety of this is cause and effect. Documentation vs expectation.
Someday it might hold far value to users. As 'I hope ot does '! :)
1 TheDaisyCutter 2017-09-06
lol .... seems like someone is afraid and not entirely sure if he will be wrong or not.
If you were so convinced he was a fool, wouldn't you take the bet?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Exactly. But then it will be a 'coincidence'. Lmao-
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
People were trying to bet this guy $100 on his last post (where he was equally confidence and where nothing happened). ParsingSol didn't take it, but multiple users wanted to (bet he'd be incorrect).
This bet isn't about being convinced or not, it's not no one wants to see ParsingSol or anyone else on here on Gone Wild.
1 soontocollege 2017-09-06
Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
1 TheDaisyCutter 2017-09-06
14 divided by 2 is 7 6 in one hand, half dozen in the other What goes around, comes around
I know right.... Wat
1 Penoii 2017-09-06
You dodged a bullet by not taking that bet lmao
1 DiseasedPidgeon 2017-09-06
WE DEMAND A GONEWILD POST
1 A-02 2017-09-06
Let's see that schlong m80.
1 Spark_Plugg 2017-09-06
Remindme! 8 days
1 SANTACLAWZ28 2017-09-06
Deal. Send me a pm when you post
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Taken.
1 dankweeddoe 2017-09-06
You going to post to Gonewild now?
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/08/mexico-struck-by-earthquake-of-magnitude-8-tsunami-possible-usgs.html
1 TH3SCARFATH3R 2017-09-06
As much as I'd hate to see it, I need to see him own up to this.
1 kousi 2017-09-06
Link us the post when it's up!
1 totipasman 2017-09-06
Send me a pm when you post please.
Thanks.
1 mayavision 2017-09-06
What's good?
1 dalik 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 2 days
1 jgemeigh 2017-09-06
Earthquakes happen all the time. 8.0 is not something you just predict. Any more than you predict the lottery numbers. If the guy said there's gonna be an 8.0 this coming week and within 4 says he makes good, and you bet him you post on GW. I BETTER SEE SOMW BOOBS OR SOMW DIX.
1 Yawgie 2017-09-06
Coward
1 TrumpIsAHero1 2017-09-06
You pussy.
You made a bet. Fucking own up to it.
1 Knowledge_Me 2017-09-06
No, OP states in his post he is not predicting the location. You have to read on in the thread to find a location and that was because he was goaded into throwing one out there. Just back out of it without the lame excuses.
1 BaconAllDay2 2017-09-06
TRAITOR! -Kylo Ren
1 Mendican 2017-09-06
You're a lying honorless cunt.
1 TH3SCARFATH3R 2017-09-06
Replying to your edit where you're saying it was because of Japan that you didn't get it... His comment that you agreed to states 8.0 in 7 days. That's what you agreed to. Own up.
Here, I'll help you:
/r/gonewild
1 Jaskre 2017-09-06
Hey everyone this guy's a phoney!
1 reverendfrag4 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 1 week
1 passion4pizza 2017-09-06
Omfg it's going down !!!
1 Nanderson423 2017-09-06
Honestly, he is probably just going to keep claiming there will be an 8+ "within the next two weeks" every two weeks till one happens. Then, of course, he will point out how right he was.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Actually I only post based on solar weather updates.
I dont do assessments based on anything other then the solar data itself.
1 Zerophobe 2017-09-06
And it would still be okay in a two week window.
8pointers don't happen everyday
1 AdventurePee 2017-09-06
well it happened
1 Grobbley 2017-09-06
He was right btw.
1 HuginochMunin 2017-09-06
Lol. Btfo
1 whey_to_go 2017-09-06
Welp...
1 jimstar777 2017-09-06
OP didn't choose the Thug Life, the Thug Life chose him.
1 Cheeseypoofs123 2017-09-06
Show me ur tiddies loset
1 Zombie421 2017-09-06
You owe us a gonewild post ;)
1 Th3_Admiral 2017-09-06
I swear there are more people in this single thread that want to see me naked than there have ever been in real life.
1 InfectedBananas 2017-09-06
Dude, the last time you said there would be a huge earthquake, you were wrong.
You keep being wrong.
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-09-06
He's been right a few times. Not sure if this account or his other account.
1 InfectedBananas 2017-09-06
The only times he's been right is like 5.0 in the most active earthquake area in the world
1 malawisativa 2017-09-06
no he got a 6 something when he predicted a 7. It hit indo or the philapine but not japan like predicted.
Yes a 6 is magnitudes less than a 7 and japan aint indo but as far as i can see its like tipping a horse. win or place. Many times you loose but its better than no prediction.
This is why i come to conspiracy. Cool fringe shit like this.
1 Garbagebutt 2017-09-06
If I predict an earthquake once a week something close will pop up eventually.
1 L0RENZ0V0NMATTERH0RN 2017-09-06
Something about a blind clock finding a nut twice a day right?
1 BernieBalloonHair 2017-09-06
So look at the one time he was right and ignore the dozens of times he's been wrong? C'mon that can't sit right with people
1 Max_Fenig 2017-09-06
He was just right.
1 coffeedude7 2017-09-06
Everyone can be right if they guess enough. That's DJ's magic of probabilities.
1 threesixzero 2017-09-06
Turns out he was right this tiem.
1 notSherrif_realLife 2017-09-06
Welp, he's not wrong...
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
And what will you do when nothing happens?
Delete your account?
Pretend you were right?
Make up some excuse?
Or will you finally admit that your preditions are worthless?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Nah. I will do a gone wild post if im wrong.
You gonna do one if im right?
1 BernieBalloonHair 2017-09-06
Dude nobody wants to see your fat hairy body. A fucking gonewild post just goes to prove you're here to just for attention.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Weird cause I do this in hopes to achieve something. In spite of ignoring most users?
1 BernieBalloonHair 2017-09-06
By trying to swindle people for their money?
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
How about you just admit that you've made yet another inaccurate prediction, instead of ignoring this prediction, like you've done all the other ones that have been inaccurate? No one cares about you posting on Gone Wild.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I dont care either.
Im just pretty sure a big big big earthquakes on the way. You all will cry coincidence. Lmao-
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
Yeah, I'm real worried. When you're wrong this time, will you fuck off to your own sub and stop bullshitting people and begging for money for your "predictions"?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Yes. Tbh. I don't find myself as wasting my own time. So I expect to be right. Will you credit me for being right if I am?
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
Absolutely. I'll also hold my breath until that happens.
Will you admit most of your predictions have been wrong if this one isn't correct?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I already do.
1 By_Design_ 2017-09-06
you seeing this? https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/6yspm7/magnitude_80_earthquake_strikes_off_the_coast_of/
1 AutoModerator 2017-09-06
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Ragnarokcometh 2017-09-06
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4417956/massive-earthquake-measuring-magnitude-8-strikes-mexico-sparking-tsunami-warning/
;)
1 Ragnarokcometh 2017-09-06
Tsunami confirmed- * AN EARTHQUAKE WITH A PRELIMINARY MAGNITUDE OF 8.2 OCCURRED OFF THE COAST OF CHIAPAS, MEXICO AT 0449 UTC ON FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 8 2017.
TSUNAMI WAVES HAVE BEEN OBSERVED.
BASED ON ALL AVAILABLE DATA... HAZARDOUS TSUNAMI WAVES ARE FORECAST FOR SOME COASTS.
TSUNAMI THREAT FORECAST
TSUNAMI WAVES REACHING MORE THAN 3 METERS ABOVE THE TIDE LEVEL ARE POSSIBLE ALONG SOME COASTS OF
MEXICO.
TSUNAMI WAVES REACHING 0.3 TO 1 METERS ABOVE THE TIDE LEVEL ARE POSSIBLE FOR SOME COASTS OF
AMERICAN SAMOA... ANTARCTICA... COOK ISLANDS... ECUADOR... EL SALVADOR... FIJI... FRENCH POLYNESIA... GUATEMALA... KIRIBATI... NEW ZEALAND... SAMOA... TOKELAU... TUVALU... VANUATU... AND WALLIS AND FUTUNA.
TSUNAMI WAVES ARE FORECAST TO BE LESS THAN 0.3 METERS ABOVE THE TIDE LEVEL FOR THE COASTS OF
AUSTRALIA... CHILE... CHINA... CHUUK... COLOMBIA... COSTA RICA... GUAM... HAWAII... HONDURAS... HOWLAND AND BAKER... INDONESIA... JAPAN... JARVIS ISLAND... JOHNSTON ATOLL... KERMADEC ISLANDS... KOSRAE... MALAYSIA... MARSHALL ISLANDS... MIDWAY ISLAND... NAURU... NEW CALEDONIA... NICARAGUA... NIUE... NORTHERN MARIANAS... NORTHWESTERN HAWAIIAN ISLANDS... PALAU... PALMYRA ISLAND... PANAMA... PAPUA NEW GUINEA... PERU... PHILIPPINES... PITCAIRN ISLANDS... POHNPEI... RUSSIA... SOLOMON ISLANDS... TAIWAN... TONGA... VIETNAM... WAKE ISLAND... AND YAP.
http://tsunami.gov/events/PHEB/2017/09/08/17251000/4/WEPA40/WEPA40.txt
1 hastagelf 2017-09-06
/u/purple_pink damn.
1 hineysight 2017-09-06
It didn't take that long. Are you blue in the face?
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
He predicted an 8.3 or higher in Japan or Nepal.
There was an 8.1 in Mexico.
I'm not sure I'm all that impressed, tbh.
1 oo40oztofreedum 2017-09-06
8 hrs later...
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
....there was an 8.1 in Mexico, not an 8.3 or higher in Japan or Nepal. Meh.
1 mayavision 2017-09-06
damn son!
1 MassStockholmSyndrom 2017-09-06
Go on credit him.
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
He predicted an 8.3 or higher in Japan or Nepal.
There was an 8.1 in Mexico.
I'm not sure I'm all that impressed, tbh.
1 ITK_REPEATEDLY 2017-09-06
Your ego is ridiculous. I bet you're a lot of fun at parties.
1 Riptidecharger 2017-09-06
You fucking kidding me?
1 AlexIsTheBestName 2017-09-06
Almost as much as you being a karma whore.
1 SinYang13 2017-09-06
And here comes the downvote train
1 logga 2017-09-06
Kiss the ring.
1 TheUserNameMe 2017-09-06
well? lol
does this mean you will be fucking off to your own sub now?
1 op-return 2017-09-06
Please. Hold it for ever.
1 totipasman 2017-09-06
Oh boy...
1 windtonner 2017-09-06
Well, this post didn't age well. How do you feel now troll? You said you will credit him ("absolutely") if he was right. Well... we are waiting gpg.
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
I mean, he did say it would be on the other side of the world, but I admit I am impressed that there was an earthquake with the strength he predicted.
1 soobadoob 2017-09-06
he was right? will you fuck off now?
1 op-return 2017-09-06
Lol. Who is the idiot now,?
1 binauralbeatz 2017-09-06
He doesn't have to do any of those things, since gullible people will still believe him and upvote all his posts.
1 The_Bluest_Things 2017-09-06
He was right. 8.0 in Mexico 10 minutes ago
1 Tier_1_Masturbator 2017-09-06
But he said Japan or Nepal. Partial credit for guessing the scale, but he was a few thousand miles off.
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6yhv3l/the_ultimate_earthquake_test_is_about_to_commence/dmox7n6/
1 Infiniteexpression 2017-09-06
Lol. Guy predicts a super rare event and gives a guess on where, super rare event happens exactly when he predicted. Random redditer "half credit- nice try."
1 Tier_1_Masturbator 2017-09-06
Guy predicts a super rare event a lot, and is wrong a lot.
If he gets another one right on magnitude, then I'll be impressed
1 Parkertw 2017-09-06
A 5.3 just hit Japan
1 Tier_1_Masturbator 2017-09-06
Japan has also has 21 earthquakes in the past 30 days, and 443 in the past 365 days.
Saying there is going to be an earthquake in Japan over the span of a week is like saying there's going to be no rain in the Sahara for a week.
1 coffeedude7 2017-09-06
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Doesn't mean I trust it to get me to work on time.
1 atheists4jesus 2017-09-06
Hahahaha eat your own
1 jingowatt 2017-09-06
Dude.
1 shmoozem 2017-09-06
Wow ur a dumbfuck
1 Bread_is_the_devil 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
I'm down for this one
1 Garbagebutt 2017-09-06
How much $$$$ will you bet?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I have 0 stanley nickles.
1 Zyzzbrah17 2017-09-06
If you can give me a fair currency trade I will bet you 100 Schrute bucks! Honestly though, if youre right or wrong it is still interesting to see the info you post. Thank you
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Whats the conversion rate of stanley nickels to schrute bucks?
1 _FAPPLE_JACKS_ 2017-09-06
Luckily you didn't bet. Massive earthquake in Mexico
1 HangryBuffaloBill 2017-09-06
can you dumb it down for us lay men?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
The sun charges earths magnetosphere by depositing electrons to the flux magnetic tubes. Which kinda boil the earth from the inside out. Like a microwave / pizza pocket.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
Could we store this charge in some sort of flux capacitor?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
No
1 ResistAuthority 2017-09-06
Great Scott!
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
How is that supposed to work?
1 HangryBuffaloBill 2017-09-06
i have to look into this, ive never heard this before. and your saying there is direct correlation between the sun and earthquakes?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Correct
1 Nanderson423 2017-09-06
Please describe these flux magnetic tubes.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Its in the comments.
1 Nanderson423 2017-09-06
No, its not. I just went through ALL of your posts (simply pulling up your history and doing ctrl+F) and you have not ONCE explained what the "Earth's flux magnetic tubes" are. Every time you dodge the question.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I have a thread on flux tubes vs magnetosphere. /r/parsingsol
1 Nanderson423 2017-09-06
Then link to it.... Because I just looked, and don't see anything of the kind. And if you don't feel like linking, then you should easily be able briefly explain them here. Since they are the entire basis for your theory.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
https://www.reddit.com/r/ParsingSol/comments/6kl90n/plasma_tubes_as_a_key_factor/?utm_content=title&utm_medium=hot&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=ParsingSol
Look for more. I told you there were links and comments in my user history. I wish to free my time from questions where users can find the answers on their own. I mean that respectfully. I have an important phone call soon. So my time is limited today :(
1 AutoModerator 2017-09-06
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Nice job!!!
1 Faerieteller 2017-09-06
I'll be the first to say that you were right.
1 Ayy_2_Brute 2017-09-06
prepare for some upvotes I guess. You nailed it
1 BrianDawkins 2017-09-06
You're right
1 Aurailious 2017-09-06
WTF dude?
1 MountRest 2017-09-06
Well shit
1 M4miniW4_WUMBO 2017-09-06
How the fuck did you know!?
1 jaydwalk 2017-09-06
Another...eh not worth my time.
1 isjusgaem 2017-09-06
Welp
1 jaydwalk 2017-09-06
Yeah guess the guy that said another prediction another nothing feels real stupid now!
1 Snipe812 2017-09-06
Except he was right. An 8.0 just hit Mexico.
1 vingt_et_un 2017-09-06
except he said east coast of japan...
1 Infiniteexpression 2017-09-06
So, does that take away from the fact he predicted a super rare event and called the time and magnitude?
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Hmm.... Doesn't seem to be the case...
1 Kladinov 2017-09-06
Are you fucking kidding we literally just had an 8.1 quake in Mexico
1 TheGrimGrimoire 2017-09-06
WELP.
1 greenteaexperience 2017-09-06
The less a man makes declarative statements, the less apt he is to look foolish in retrospect.
1 krazykoo 2017-09-06
and then there was an 8.0 in Mexico 24 hours later.....
1 falconerhk 2017-09-06
Words are delicious. Bon appetite!
1 Frosty4l5 2017-09-06
You were wrong as shit
1 catsnstuffz 2017-09-06
You were wrong as shit
1 ezzy_bear 2017-09-06
8.0 off the coast of Mexico today. Check. Mate.
1 coocookazoo 2017-09-06
Don't you feel dumb
1 WHYHRUDOINDAT 2017-09-06
damn
1 lakdaddy 2017-09-06
haha eat a fat one you negative richard cranium.
1 Kalandros-X 2017-09-06
Turns out he was right.
1 Seiryth 2017-09-06
Lol well you were wrong eh
1 Cheeseypoofs123 2017-09-06
Haha
1 Subwayabuseproblem 2017-09-06
How do you feel today?
1 Idrjs 2017-09-06
Boy were you wrong
1 CosmonaughtyIsRoboty 2017-09-06
What was that?
1 BunchOCrunch 2017-09-06
You were wrong fyi
1 UberEpicZach 2017-09-06
Mexico
1 shmoozem 2017-09-06
Omg u were so wrong
1 EricCarver 2017-09-06
Thanks ParsingSol. Hopefully you are wrong, but this CME seems pretty ominous.
1 lockesmadman 2017-09-06
This scientist disagrees (see Q&A at end where this specific question comes up) https://www.pscp.tv/w/1OyJArQlrgDxb
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Many don't and do support this phenomenon
1 lockesmadman 2017-09-06
no doubt- just throwing it out there. if someone went with as above so below I wouldn't hold it against them either for example
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Honestly it's a really good question. Check out the links. :) *(new ammo).
The data's really looking good at first glance :)
1 TimmySatanicTurner 2017-09-06
She just lost all credibility with what happened today.
gg, someone tell her to go back to McDonalds and put OP on a 6k salary
1 lockesmadman 2017-09-06
This? https://mobile.twitter.com/newearthquake/status/906019415904227329
1 izzzzzzzzzzzzz 2017-09-06
im excited and scared at the same time, but im always hopeful more insight can be gained.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I always hope we learn something new :)
1 Freonbarb 2017-09-06
At the risk of sounding ignorant, what do solar flares have to do with earthquakes? Not trolling, just hoping for some kind of explanation for this supposed correlation.
1 Blakwulf 2017-09-06
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=2ExcoItb4oc
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I'm short:
I believe they induct the planet electrically. This causing planetary flux tubes to increase In their conveying velocity; which leads to the tripping of underground fault systems .
1 Freonbarb 2017-09-06
Interesting, thanks. I never knew there might be a connection.
1 darkgrey 2017-09-06
What is a planetary flux tube? In your words, please
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
A plasma filament filled with particles which create a circuit which conveys within the earths core dynamo. The cylinder tube is a braid of eletromagnetic bands which flow towards a northern polarity which their intensity/ velocity may in theory induct the strength of the magnetospheres 'magnetic field lines'.
1 MarcAA 2017-09-06
That's not what it is. They are 3d magnetic field structures. They are inside and ouside the earth.
1 MarcAA 2017-09-06
High energy photons are not deflected by our magnetosphere. High energy particles are.
Magnetic flux tubes convey incoming charged particles to both poles.
1 astrofreak92 2017-09-06
Nothing, and there is no correlation. /u/ParsingSol has never actually created a statistical model or done the math for his predictions, it's all made up.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I literally have a process? So no its not.
1 SpongeBobSquarePants 2017-09-06
Text copied below this point at 21:03 GMT for comparison and verification purposes. No edits made, I simply copied and pasted the text.
0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0
(for those not staying tuned September 6, 2017 @ 14:00 UTC Major Spaceweather Event (X9.3 Flare) / CME(Updated) The largest solar flare of the current solar cycle 24 was just observed around region 2673. The massive event measuring X9.3 peaked at 12:02 UTC Wednesday. A Type II radio emission with an estimated velocity of 1969 km/s was recorded. A bright coronal mass ejection (CME) is visible in the latest STEREO Ahead imagery and will likely be directed our way. More to follow once Earth facing LASCO coronagraph imagery becomes available. Aurora sky watchers may be in for a treat later this week. ALERT: Type II Radio Emission Begin Time: 2017 Sep 06 1202 UTC Estimated Velocity: 1969 km/s Description: Type II emissions occur in association with eruptions on the sun and typically indicate a coronal mass ejection is associated with a flare event. SUMMARY: 10cm Radio Burst Begin Time: 2017 Sep 06 1154 UTC Maximum Time: 2017 Sep 06 1156 UTC End Time: 2017 Sep 06 1157 UTC Duration: 3 minutes Peak Flux: 12000 sfu September 6, 2017 @ 09:25 UTC X2.2 Flare! (Updated) Region 2673 just produced a nice X2.2 solar flare at approximately 09:10 UTC (Sept 6). This is the first X-Class event to be detected since May 2015. The active region is still in a decent position for Earth directed eruptions. More updates will be provided should a coronal mass ejection (CME) be associated. More to follow. Image courtesy of SDO/AIA. the X2 solar flare did not appear to generate a noteworthy solar flare. Winds 850 - 950km/s 8.0 9.5+ 750 - 850km/s 6.0-7.5+ 650 - 750km/s 5.5 6.5+ 550 - 650km/s 4.0 5.5+/- 450 - 550km/s 3.5 4.5+/- New Ammo from mirth-red I have taken the 1 min mean Bz Data from NASAs ACE (the DSCOVR data portal is relay cancer) and compared them to earthquakes. http://imgur.com/HP3ArCn Black points are earthquakes - Higher y-value -> greater magnitude The y-Value for Bz data-points is the intensity of your so called "breach". I assume the intensity of a "breach" is |Bt - Bz| The color shows the Bz value itself. The values have some shitty scale for comparison. The time frame is 01-01-17 to 08-28-17 There are really some intense earthquakes only days after a big "breeches" and high |Bz| values. Maybe there is a correlation. I didn't run any statistic tests, so my guess is so good as yours. And of course don't forget: "Correlation does not imply causation." At least this does not obviously contradict your theory. 2017, 2015-2016 2011 I had 2011 processed early. I am not giving a projected location this year. The projection is for a 8.0-9.5 magnitude quake. I've included all processed data showing the correlation between b's breaches and seismic events known to date. Most years showing a consistent relationship. If you are good at statistical analysis we could use your help. Please pm me. So ya. I literally think 8.0 is easy this time around kids... It's coming. A week tops- So 7day warning;
1 JebatGa 2017-09-06
You are a fraud! In this post you said and i will quote you:
You were 100% wrong and you have proven your theory is a bunch of bullshit. All you do is guess. Many commentators have shown how easy it is to guess the way you do. Pick an active zone - don't be too specific, wide time frame and something around 6.0 earthquake.
Many times those people were much better than you in those guesses. I really can't believe some people still buy your bullshit. I'm speculating half the comments are your alt-accounts just so you can feel better about yourself.
1 Th3_Admiral 2017-09-06
There does seem to always be a high number of upvoted comments on his posts saying some variation of "I know you get a lot of flak, but you always work so hard and do such a good job. Keep up the great work!" I don't see that kind of praise around here for people who are actually right, let alone someone who is consistently wrong.
1 ZiggyAdventures 2017-09-06
He's passionate and giving his all. It doesn't matter if he ends up being right or wrong, it might nonetheless provide some new insight or we learn Earthquakes don't correlate with CMEs.
Also, I'd gladly read this over most of the Hot topics here.
1 Th3_Admiral 2017-09-06
Why do people keep saying that? Of course it matters. When all of those 4Chan posts about "massive arrests starting tomorrow" kept being wrong, people eventually stopped listening to them and posting them here. If something keeps being passed off as "absolutely true this time, for real guys" and keeps failing to deliver, why would anyone bother listening anymore. Like I've said before, I liked these posts at first but until they actually start producing accurate results (more accurate than random guessing) I'm really not sure why anyone keeps falling for them.
1 ZiggyAdventures 2017-09-06
There is a good case that ParsingSol has shown no correlation. The difference is the result isn't as consequential to me. Him being wrong is good too. Having organized and analyzed graphs can be beneficial by itself.
Meanwhile, 4chan posts about "massive arrests starting tomorrow" rely solely on the outcome. There is no back work that is beneficial, hence a lesser desire to read up on it.
Additionally, space is cool, CME are cool, flares are cool, earthquakes are cool, SECCHI and SOHO are cool. Quite simply just personal preference.
Politics isn't cool and I think many are tired of them.This is why I'd rather read his likely wrong prediction(I am indeed skeptical of it).
Lastly, it's one topic once in a while on a busy sub-reddit. It's not like he's taking over.
1 Generic_On_Reddit 2017-09-06
Showing that a model is wrong is a very important part of science, and it's still respectable when you learn this. But my problem with him (I'm not the guy you've replied to) is that he doesn't have any set criteria for a failed hypothesis, not in terms of time window, area of effect or anything. And he doesn't seem to collect any data for his predictions versus reality either.
So he just keeps going without being able to conclusively and scientifically say whether his predictions have been accurate over time.
1 ZiggyAdventures 2017-09-06
Good points. ParsingSol did not actually provide any data for his 8.0-9.5 Earthquake prediction(my mentioned skepticism in my prior post). I assumed he was keeping data, but that is just an assumption.
I scoured his past posts and read the his Seismic Prediction essay. I found posts attempting to design a database for comparison and specific cases of CME and earthquake overlap. I was disappointed to not see any statistical analysis or any original data besides the case study of events.
He also does himself a disservice by exaggerating. He says he is progressing and I wouldn't dissuade him from posting these. I admired Th3_Admiral's approach when he confronted ParingSol about being precise on the timetable and scale.
I would still not attack him over this and let those who enjoy this content to enjoy it in peace.
1 bamboobooks 2017-09-06
Because if he's wrong at least we can rule out his methods and models and try something else. That's totally different to people making up stories with no basis for attention
1 ChadluvsZion 2017-09-06
And there you have what's wrong with the education system in this country.
1 InfectedBananas 2017-09-06
Most of the time he picks an area known for large and many earthquakes.
He basically predicting if there will be a shooting in Baltimore.
1 bamboobooks 2017-09-06
There's a name for the fallacy you just used, not sure I know it though.
1 diehardgiraffe 2017-09-06
Broken clock fallacy maybe? If that's not the name, it should be.
1 bamboobooks 2017-09-06
I feel like you are applying that to op. Unsure. I meant for the guy I responded to. Most large earthquakes occur in the ring of fire, so whether op is right or wrong of course most of his predictions would be there as even a very accurate model for murders would often guess baltimore.
1 bamboobooks 2017-09-06
That's a good name for it though
1 mcvey 2017-09-06
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_sharpshooter_fallacy
maybe?
1 TinyZoro 2017-09-06
There have been less than 1 recorded 8.0 and above earthquake a year in the last 100 years, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_21st-century_earthquakes#/media/File:USGS_magnitude_8_earthquakes_since_1900.svg. So predicting one the week it happens is a pretty impressive fluke.
1 WaitTilUSeeMyDick 2017-09-06
Wow. You have a total boner for this dude... If you don't believe him, then just untag him and move on. This is the internet. You aren't some Batman or something.
1 JebatGa 2017-09-06
Now i'm sure he's using alt-accounts.
1 WaitTilUSeeMyDick 2017-09-06
Lol k. I can't believe you saw through my clever ruse of posting for two years without ever even replying to the dude. Great job scooby
1 Top-Cheese 2017-09-06
Who's on who's dick again?
1 WaitTilUSeeMyDick 2017-09-06
Find any time before today I ever spoke about this earthquake user. Go ahead. I'll wait.
It's just sketchy this dude makes it his job to stalk someone who has a theory they are testing by themselves.. It's not like the dude believes he is infallible. He's studying what no-one else now really is. Worst case scenario? We find that there is no correlation.
I'll take someone who has an idea and tries to prove it over someone who just follows and naysays.
1 elcalrissian 2017-09-06
He wasn't incorrect:
https://www.google.com/amp/abc7.com/amp/80-earthquake-strikes-coast-of-mexico/2390046/
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He wasn't exactly right either
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6yhv3l/the_ultimate_earthquake_test_is_about_to_commence/dmox7n6
If you keep predicting things eventually you will get something somewhat right. You can't just say "there is going to be an earthquake but I don't know where" and not give a location. Earthquakes happen all the time, when he gives a location he is sometimes "right" but his locations are never correct.
1 CallMeDende 2017-09-06
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/09/08/americas/earthquake-hits-off-the-coast-of-southern-mexico/index.html
You done complaining?
1 bittermanscolon 2017-09-06
Did you not make a prediction about a large one not too long ago? Did that one happen?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Last one was shit. :(
First eclipse. More conspiracy then anything. This is an x class event. I'm as sure about this as I am my own sanity?
1 bittermanscolon 2017-09-06
Just checking! Not saying anything, just trying to keep up.
1 futant462 2017-09-06
How sure are you about your own sanity though?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Most people are comfortable near me, I suppose. :)
1 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2017-09-06
Please do not attack other users, only warning.
1 futant462 2017-09-06
Of course. That was in no way an attack though. It was a logic joke as he was implying his sanity had a value that was known to everyone, but that was never explicitly stated. OP took it in the spirit I intended based on his reply.
1 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2017-09-06
Ah I see, my apologies for the misread.
1 devils_advocaat 2017-09-06
The last one was shit, but it's an extra data point.
How has your mental model changed?
1 astrofreak92 2017-09-06
There is no model.
1 digiorno 2017-09-06
So you're right? There was an 8.x in Mexico.
1 DoublePlusGoodly 2017-09-06
Let's hope it's not Fukushima 2.0.
Good work. I think what you do is super interesting.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I think thats exactly what this is-
1 DoublePlusGoodly 2017-09-06
Do you remember the CME before the big Fukushima quake last time? I do.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Yep. Thats what lead me to trying to create my model.
1 DoublePlusGoodly 2017-09-06
......And, you fucking nailed it. 8.0 off the coast of Mexico.
Twenty bucks says that's not the only big quake we'll have in the coming week.
1 Event_Horizon12 2017-09-06
Didn't you say there was going to be one last week? Never heard about an earthquake
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I fully admit last week was shit. I shouldn't have done eclipse based posts with mild activity.
This is x class territory. Not to be confused with the mild solar weather that occurred at that time.
1 DoublePlusGoodly 2017-09-06
It's actually, IMO, not the size of the flare - it's the size / energy of the CME that counts. At least, that's been my casual observation over the years.
1 ProfWhite 2017-09-06
So, would you say, that it's reasonable to infer that it's not the size of the boat, but rather, the motion of the ocean, that counts?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Fully agree. Very large full halo. Good earth directed proportion. X range. Not looking good really...
1 theFunkiestButtLovin 2017-09-06
what all are you sharing from your model?
1 alcogiggles 2017-09-06
That's what she said.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Gigitty
1 CellSeat 2017-09-06
Kudos for owning your mistake last week, I read that one, it was still a great post!
1 Mugros 2017-09-06
Don't predict, do statistical analysis on historic data. Sun activity and earthquakes have been measures for a long time. Show us the results.
1 M4GICM1KE 2017-09-06
I saw the news on the flair and wondered if a post from you would show up here. As far as a learning experience I hope you're right...but I really hope your wrong..no offense.
1 DaMamba 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-09-06
Don't care if your right or wrong. Upvoted thread anyway.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Did the comment because I apprecieate it :).
1 robotlordsoftokeyo 2017-09-06
There was someone a couple weeks ago said this would happen. Still waiting.
1 Sendmyabar 2017-09-06
Once I saw the news about this flare I immediately looked up to see what your prediction was :). It's always a balance of hoping your right vs not wanting areas to be devastated by giant earthquakes. After the last big flare we didn't get a serious earthquake, but we did get two of the strongest tropical cyclones in recent memory. Do you think that solar flares could be affecting the weather just as much as seismic movement?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Honestly yes....
Likely jetstream related.
This is much much much more intense this series. X9.3 thats huge!. Like fukushima 9.0 huge. (x 1 1)
1 Guerrilla_Time 2017-09-06
Even if there were to be an 8.0+ or higher, this still proves nothing you know that right? If it did mean something you should be able to go back to previous sun events like this one and link them to major earthquakes happening. Have you done that yet? Any historical data to back up this current claim?
If past sun events like this one don't have major earthquakes after them, then a major earthquake this time is more in line as a random event... a fluke... not related.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I am working on it. So far 2017 and 2011 show a very significant correlation to quake intensity in days following a bz breach. The 2015 data is unclear and I am working to explore the year and the coronal holes / cmes per year for alternative geo magnetic activity.
We hope to get a statician soon to see if we are wasting our time or not.
1 Guerrilla_Time 2017-09-06
Interesting. Thanks for the reply.
1 osm0sis 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 The_Rhythm_Ninja 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 htok54yk 2017-09-06
You're so full of shit. How many more faulty predictions until you admit that you're wrong?
1 Argarck 2017-09-06
Wanna correct yourself?
1 TH3SCARFATH3R 2017-09-06
Probably not. Most of the naysayers I've seen haven't bothered or don't care to. Even if there's slight correlation, this could mean something... what? No idea.
1 htok54yk 2017-09-06
He's been making false predictions for months.
1 Whyisnthillaryinjail 2017-09-06
Every single post I've ever seen you make is a grandiose claim of something coming followed by nothing. This thread is pretty much a gullibility test.
1 kingPLoPz 2017-09-06
*this sub
1 HuginochMunin 2017-09-06
What you got to say now?
1 KarmelCHAOS 2017-09-06
Throw shit at a wall long enough and you're bound to hit something eventually?
1 TrooperRamRod 2017-09-06
Except he was 100% right. If it were just something close I'd agree with you. He said "I literally think there will be an 8.0 earthquake within the week..."
1 KarmelCHAOS 2017-09-06
Yeah, but that's where that saying comes from. He was right once out of however many times he's made predictions. It's definitely interesting and I think warrants more research into the methods they used
1 Nlashb 2017-09-06
A broken clock is right twice a day.
1 slayer3294 2017-09-06
He might of called it this time lol
1 trainstation98 2017-09-06
...
1 DinduMuffins69 2017-09-06
I said this in your last thread from 2 weeks ago and ill say it again.
There won't be Jack shit kiddo.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
X class begs to differ.
1 kr1tterz 2017-09-06
Wrekt
1 DolanTurnip 2017-09-06
This guy's job is to sell you earthquakes when an EMP detonation makes more sense.
1 airzoom23 2017-09-06
I appreciate these threads. It's a good change up from "But Grumphf and muh russha guise!"
1 Catsarereptilians2 2017-09-06
http://ds.iris.edu/seismon/zoom/?view=eveday&lon=-106&lat=47
With all those earthquakes around Yellowstone, this is getting spoopy.
1 man_slave 2017-09-06
Weren't you totally wrong about this just the other week?
1 slayer3294 2017-09-06
But today he's not wrong...
1 bermudi86 2017-09-06
So based on just those two events he has a 50% prediction success (as good as random). Any more failed predictions we should take into account?
1 slayer3294 2017-09-06
Lol I don't really care, I was just giving him credit just for the random prediction.
1 man_slave 2017-09-06
lol I heard about it on the radio and immediately thought of this. Now he just has to prove he can repeat it reliably.
1 arlaman 2017-09-06
People are talking about this on 4chan and it is attracting a ton of disinfo. Might be legit.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I bet my ass on it.
1 bananapeel 2017-09-06
Where is the quake predicted?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Primary east japan namie prefumecture. Or, Central Nepal Himalayan mtns. That would be my primary areas of concern.
1 Illinois_Jones 2017-09-06
Based on?
1 mad-dog-2020 2017-09-06
Lol k
1 mrcassette 2017-09-06
and now...?
1 Bigpiganddig 2017-09-06
Watch it hit North Korea
1 unruly_mattress 2017-09-06
There is a simple way to test the accuracy of a prediction models. You take the past inputs the the model, you run them in the model, you compare what actually happened with the model output. Then you aggregate and publish the results so others can try running it themselves.
1 exomniac 2017-09-06
What should we call this method?
1 RR4YNN 2017-09-06
I think we should call it a transgression. Or something like that.
1 Birdinhandandbush 2017-09-06
Reddit Gold?
1 ScribebyTrade 2017-09-06
Flimflamming
1 j0e_the_an0n 2017-09-06
Parsingsol
1 j0e_the_an0n 2017-09-06
Parsingsol
1 lowkey_chingon 2017-09-06
Science-y method
1 ILOVEYABADMOMO 2017-09-06
hoping you gain some credibility because you sure have lost a lot.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I truly agree. I get my laptop back soon. Hoping to begin processing the data from past archives and run full on statistical extraction processes to see if we have something.
Were getting closer and closer to having a tried and true argument. Updates will follow soon :)
1 ILOVEYABADMOMO 2017-09-06
<333 good luck man
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Thanks man.
:)
1 alienigenasfaltosdea 2017-09-06
He called it
1 ReallyBigShow 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 ReallyBigShow 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 ReallyBigShow 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 ReallyBigShow 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 aacool 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 aacool 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 10 days
1 obsessile 2017-09-06
Lol, just like the last one I bet.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Whos still stupid to fall for OPs bullshit.
He just guesses.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Not at all. Theres a pretty detailed post on how I think this all works.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
There's really not.
Guessing is not a model
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I wouldn't say I am guessing.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6yhv3l/_/dmni6ce
Literally you guessing
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
No literally using a process I wrote months ago. As sourced within the threads.
1 StevenMahanahan 2017-09-06
How do you feel now? Seems like an educated guess, but better than just a random guess.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_sharpshooter_fallacy
Nowhere near Japan, but lets just ignore that eh.
1 HelperBot_ 2017-09-06
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_sharpshooter_fallacy
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 109308
1 rythian_ 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 newhavenlao 2017-09-06
7 Days... Lets see..
I remember you made one 2 weeks ago, then you made one for the eclipse (which i somehow missed). Overall if this does not come true, your creds will be withered. I had faith for the first one, i got my xenu book of mormon ready with a dixie cup jonestown style, but no spaceship came to pass because the ground didnt shake to warrant me to supposite it.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
This is an amazing way to see if ive been wasting my own time;? Or if the data is worth something to others;?
Alot of good in watching? Waiting? Sigh:(
1 newhavenlao 2017-09-06
You were right but im still skeptical. Ill hold off on putting a 'solution enema' up my ass. Good job. Hope you can hone this down so it can be more accurate. The past few predictions doesnt bode well since you were saying the same thing different days. Other than that it seems you have lots of work to do and hope no more solar flairs comes this way so you will never make these predictions again.
1 7h3dud3 2017-09-06
I wonder what /u/TheEarthQuakeGuy would have to say about this?
1 TheEarthquakeGuy 2017-09-06
I was called to the last post by ParsingSol, and while his theory is detailed, it didn't come through. We'll see about this one, but frankly, I disagree.
1 7h3dud3 2017-09-06
I believe you are correct, seems like all these fine folks are hoping for the world to end.
1 chris_tib 2017-09-06
Curious to know your thoughts on this. Pure coincidence, or is there some science behind this prediction?
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Would you be willing to do a follow up?
1 TrickyDicky1980 2017-09-06
I have followed your posts with great interest... but not religiously, ParsingSol, and Ann (;>) large part o>f me believes you're correct, that your theory is correct.
And if it is... beware... because they'll* steal it from you.
*They already know, and will use it to their financial advantage!
I'll keep my eyes on the "news".
Peace and Love to you, and yours.
1 Memory_holy_fire 2017-09-06
Can I recommend that you reach out and talk with someone? His name is Stan Deyo. He has a website. Reach out and contact him and talk him through your process. I think you both could gain greatly.
1 BasedGodBernie 2017-09-06
I believe you. Keep doing what your doing.
1 Bradderall420 2017-09-06
lol when I read about the solar flare I thought of you immediately!! Thanks for the info brother!
1 Hes_A_Fast_Cat 2017-09-06
People still upvoting this is a joke.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Not a joke
1 DemyeliNate 2017-09-06
8.0 in Mexico. Joke on that buddy.
1 SooperModelsDotCom 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000ahv0#executive
1 gbs2x 2017-09-06
Remind me! 7 days
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000ahv0#executive
1 acurafail 2017-09-06
!remindme 1 week
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000ahv0#executive
1 acurafail 2017-09-06
Very interesting. Looking forward to future predictions based on the data.
1 testu_nagouchi 2017-09-06
remindme 8 days
1 testu_nagouchi 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 8 days
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000ahv0#executive
1 __vessel__ 2017-09-06
September 11
1 EvilPhd666 2017-09-06
Given the disruption of the carribean with these massive hurricanes, do you think that area or tbe mid altantic ridge would be ripe?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I am under the impression the storms reduce this interaction (at this time). Its hard to say...
I have only seen several typhoons and hurricanes during my 6 years watching. I am disappointed in my last post. Its lead me to consider using this as an additional value / role within my own theory.
I am really unaware of the effects of geomagnetic storms on the jetstream itself. I just assume it heavily influences the winds of earth in general.
1 EvilPhd666 2017-09-06
My line of thinking is the enormous volume of mass these storms disrupt that would relieve or put pressure on the plates and fault lines.
This displacement and temperature change might also disturb the magnetic fields in the ocean as well.
See
NASA - Marine Magnetism
NASA - Ocean Tides and Magnetic Fields
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
To me its induction of the flux system. I feel the charging is what gives the magnetosphere its intensity.
Basic energy transfering (with the ionosphere activity as a solar recycling center).
1 EvilPhd666 2017-09-06
8.0 mexico
1 kannamoar 2017-09-06
Is this the same guy as u/GlobalHell? Or something to that effect?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Yes
1 kannamoar 2017-09-06
Great work man. We need you in a large, quake-proof lab with any and all instruments you require.
1 GetOutOfBox 2017-09-06
This guy is mentally ill.
1 i_LOSNAR_i 2017-09-06
Though I agree, there is a higher chance we could get rocked by this one. If you keep crying wolf eventually a wolf will eat you.
1 CelineHagbard 2017-09-06
Removed. Rule 4. You can make your point without the armchair psychology.
1 overtaxedoverworked 2017-09-06
No you didn't, somebody else did it for you ...
1 mirth_red 2017-09-06
And he conveniently forgot to mention that i said all other years i looked at don't look correlated.
1 overtaxedoverworked 2017-09-06
Unbelievable ...
1 vidjagaimes 2017-09-06
It's super disturbing that so many people above are going nuts over "a correct prediction" without checking anything in the data or where it came from.
Kudos on your analysis (all of it...) and maybe this 'result' will encourage parsing solar to publicize his model (if there is such a thing?) more concretely...
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
It says the username in the thread. (Learn to read)? Its a direct copy of his message. I just didn't link it for the users privacy.
1 BoopSquad 2017-09-06
Strange thread
1 sudo-tleilaxu 2017-09-06
OK, who's got the "nothing is going to happen" bet going?
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2017-09-06
Remindme! 7 days "earthquake warning".
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 Days "earthquake"
1 four_leaf_tayback 2017-09-06
haha this. aaaand Irma.
1 nonbiological_entity 2017-09-06
Hi again u/ParsingSol, what does this mean for those of us in Japan? Specifically the Kansai area. Thanks so much as always!
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
You should realy expect a 75% 3/11 scenario. I'd argue 2.6 meter wave heights.
What ever the circumstances were for 3.11. I would lower then by 25%. Thats what I would suggest. If this test is poaitive prepare for that scenario. 1 week of being prepared may seem significant now. However I hope this will be all for something. Meaning that my posts hold validity. So its not that I want to see anyone harmed or an event to occur. I merely feel that under these circumstances its unavoidable. So preparing to meet it stands a more effective option. (should this theory be found correct).
1 nonbiological_entity 2017-09-06
Thank you for this info! I can't describe how it feels to see you were right again. (I've been following your stuff since you posted under u/GlobalHell)
1 whenwillyoueverlearn 2017-09-06
I was just watching some flares on Helioviewer. Here's one movie I made. Great freaking site.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
You gave me a very awesome link!. Bookmarked and saved!!!
1 mirth_red 2017-09-06
For reference:
The probability that a earthquake with given magnitude happens somewhere on earth in a 7 day time frame should be something like this.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
If this test goes well. Any chance you would wanna instruct me in the program your using to process data for 2012-2014. And 2016.
I will do the work. I just need to be told how :)
I am planning on stepping up as soon as I get my computer back. I thiught that would happen yesterday. But alas it will take another week. :(
All your help and consideration means a lot to me. I linked you in the thread to give your work credit. But I'd like to truly say thank you sincerely for your participation. Your the real genius here. I just see a relationship we humans may be able to exploit. Technically. You could likely tell me more about that then me. But please base your answer on the outcome of this current test. It should be a good one. I think we both know that.
1 mirth_red 2017-09-06
I can try to explain it to you, and give you the source i used. That is no problem. Send me a message when you get a computer.
If you cite someone, you should always give the whole picture. You should have included that i did not see correlation in other years.
Whatever happens in the next 7 days isn't a test for your model.
-> We can't distinguish it from guessing. A singe hit with a 3.99% positive outcome isn't really impressive.
-> Maybe there are other factors, you did not consider yet, and 99.99% conditions would lead to a 8.5 eq.
So you really should not see something like this as a test. You have to assist many events like this. For that you need a formal model - not these incoherent posts - and test it with data from the past.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Agreed. My understanding is the better I do at these general assessments. The more ability I have as a single user to impress others upon the world that the tasks worth exploring. Im rather optionless to move forward without dedicating my time to exploring as I do. These posts lead to the creation of my subreddit where we met afterall.
What I expect to happen and havibg said it before hand greatly impresses that the time we are taking is not wasted. While its very small steps ahead. To me its more important to be walking forward slowly then to be taking no steps at all. I just do this because it seems relevant and pure. I don't know a better thing to dedicate my free time too. Life is fickle, these times are hard. I merely like to help others, and hope someday to make a 'name for myself'. Mainly wanting my daughter to be proud I achieved something in my life time. So I dedicate time into making the posts in hopes the time is well spent. So even though I agree its not 10o% proof. Its a step in the right direction. One of the few steps I can truly take (at my knowing) which produces the results I wish to inherit.
I merely think this will work. Not on all seosmoc events. But a great deal of the worst ones. Which do correlate. To me thats a magnificent achievement in my lifetime.
1 zombie_dave 2017-09-06
Form the table:
Assuming a value of 1 = 100% probability, a value of 0.00399 = 0.399%, not 3.99%. 10x less likely.
I agree that a single hit doesn't tell us much, regardless.
1 mirth_red 2017-09-06
thanks
1 mirth_red 2017-09-06
You are saying in this very post, that a speed of 850 - 950km/s triggers a earthquake with magnitude 8 to 9.5. You are predicting 8.0 to 9.0. For your previews predictions you used the bz value and speed value from http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/real-time-solar-wind. The speed since the X9 never has gone over 620km/s there.
Did you change your model? How die you predict this one?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Xclass vs m class. Also my wond estimation is 850km/s.
Noaa isnt accounting for drafting. As thus cme is following another cme's wake.
1 mirth_red 2017-09-06
What is this support to mean?
But i guess you don't get my point. You said you have some model, which is build on this data. So how are you predicting without that data is available in the moment?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Its based on my experience.
Ive always attempted to do what our programming will do. Ive constantly monitored both feeds for nearly 6 years. What I expect to see is based on my past observations. I can't do probability right now. My computer is not in my posession.
1 rednazgo 2017-09-06
RemindMe! 7 days
1 oopsreporting 2017-09-06
This is very interesting. I have seen this correlation made before between solar flares and Earthquake activity. The information seems to be solid. Let's hope that you are wrong but if you successfully predict a quake, maybe more people will listen to the data.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Haha. They call it a coincidence when I am right and insult mee either way. Having no consideration to the fact im just a guy that assesses data. :(
I thank you for the optimism greatly. Hoping a big in your face event occurs. (to those that question the process). As thus is highly highly unnormal data. So you are right. A big big big quake is likely to come. (if I am right).
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
:)
1 gotFan552 2017-09-06
What everyone should be more worried about is the relation between solar activity and hurricanes. In short, CME ejections are fast hot particles that can possibly create hurricane forming conditions. Seismic activity is then triggered due to newtons laws of motions.
1 Waiting4TheCollapse 2017-09-06
Haven't had a chance to properly look through the CME data yet. But been thinking of your model when I saw the flare.
If this CME has a large earth directed component then I guess this is it, IF your theory is to stand up then there has to be a strong earthquake.
Any thoughts on location or you not willing to stick your neck out that much?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Honestly its an x.9 Japan or nepal...
The only places on earth that I know to have these quakes aside are Chile. New Zealand/ Tonga, Philippians, or Indonesia or Mexico (city)...
Id argue nepal and japan as the most likely to have s 8.0+
I assess this event to be an 8.3 or above.
1 purple_pink 2017-09-06
So, to be clear, your prediction (based on your "model") is that there will be an earthquake that's 8.3 or higher in Nepal or Japan?
That is what you are claiming, correct?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Yes
1 Waiting4TheCollapse 2017-09-06
8.1 in Mexico City....
1 lapride7 2017-09-06
Lol bro stop, whatever you're doing is not going to work. What's your excuse this time?
1 Plz_Post_Hindu_Pepe 2017-09-06
Holy shit
1 Dawg1shly 2017-09-06
It would be nice if there was a primer on your basic theory. But it seems that your theory is that CME and/or other solar activity are either highly correlated or cause earthquakes. Is that correct?
Does the theory also expect a connection between the size of the CME and the intensity of the earthquake?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
cme's and coronal hole streams with high intensity impacts are responsible for some of earths largest seismic events. Typically the winds key is extremely relevant provided above. However as mentioned in the comments. More often then not multiple events (cme's) are produced which makes the events less likely to follow a direct cause effect relationship.
Its as though the energy dissipates as continued activity pushes the event outside its normal routine. I think this happened my first test. Or second. We had nearly 12 hours late arrival. (With a mildly Lowered seismic event.) Yet it gives reasoning that the cause effect is susceptible to time expansion via the bz's active state.
1 Dawg1shly 2017-09-06
A couple questions/comments;
When you say high intensity impacts, what is doing the impacting and which body, the sun or earth?
I thought this was a theory and you were evaluating data to determine whether the evidence supports the theory, but your first statement indicates that you theory is proven fact. Is that the case?
You say that more CME's reduces the effect that you are studying (earthquakes in this case), that would seem to undermine the theory. If A causes B, then more A should lead to more B right? What are your thoughts on this?
If a CME = significant seismic event, what is the time frame that would support your theory (e.g. +/- 12 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, etc.) and what time frame would be seen as unrelated?
Given that seismic activity and earthquakes are occurring constantly is there a minimum magnitude for the expected earthquake that occurs after a CME?
Very interesting stuff, the idea that events on the sun exert an influence on earth's gravity (and therefore seismic activity) seems at least plausible. It would be interesting for us laymen to understand how much force a large CME sends to earth in a non technical way.
1 Fuzzamuzzabreh 2017-09-06
Remind me 7 days.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
You downgraded your prior prediction from an 8.0 to a 7.0 due to time dilation but never explained why or how that would be possible. Could you explain what you meant by that and how it affects your current prediction?
1 AutoModerator 2017-09-06
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I give an initial assessment of wind speeds expected per somar intrusion. I literally assess / estimate: the wind speeds, strike of the cme. Proton density, and the quake which would follow such an event / breach.
Ive noticed that during some tests multiple cme's will occur. If the eq. Is not produced in the initial uptick it typically comes at the point a bz breach is active. I consider this a period that electrons are transfering through the flux system. During this period If more inteusions take place the bz can renain open hours or days. While seismic activity may occur. The main quakes appear to lose their expected intensity. Its as though they are weakened over time. Thus the expansion of time appears by my own personal observation appears to weaken these events.
I feel this is an important factor in my model and that if we continually monitor the legnth of events (seismic) and the height / intensity of plasma / geomagbetic storms. Conparing the two as a 'cause / effect' relationship. Qe will have a better understanding of how the live data will shape the incoming quakes as past archives may suggest various locations and intensity.
I.e. If we measure 3 incoming m-flares with cmes between 2014-2015. Each triggers a specific quake (5.5 in italy). Then the next m flare. (could hit italy).
However measuring the exact time which takes place during the cause effect may give us a better understanding of when a quake like the one I assessed will come.
In my experience its the bz componet which closes allowing for a quake to occur. So if it remains open a week. Typically a 8.0 will reduce to a 5.0 (over / in that time).
My goal was always to image the above provided data with a pro analytics firm to see how many quajes followed. Measuring the time and intensity in hopes we could extract values which would lead to the creation of an advanced seismic detection system. Once we process 1997-2017 we will have 20 years of comparative data with thousands of potential data sets to run against the live feed.
At that point the live feed would be fed through the algorithm which would scan for data which compliments past imaging. If it sees similar data which compliments a known past event. It can warn an operator of the significanct comparison which may provide warning of an upcoming event.
Seemed like a really easy thing to design. I imagine if we had a probability mechanism added with eq frequencys via past events it would greatly expand the devices efficiency.
So its a two level system. Probability vs. Solar. Likely to assess many of earths greatest quakes in advance. Furthermore taking me (the emotional human operator) out of its assessment. As what I hope to see is likely not within the data to begin with. What I do is attempt to do this job. But 20 years of data is some potential 200 killiin events in its entirety. So I doubt I will ever be a fully useful service. In that respect.
There is just so much we do know, that we arent using to our advantage. :/
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
What does that have to do with time dilation?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Well metaphorically it means 'the expansion of time' in the curves of space; Which is what time dialation is...
So to be specific I meant as more time takes place between event a. And event b. That the situation becomes less likely. But someone smart can typically decipher between an acedote and a specific term and its intended use or meaning.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
Are any portions of your current prediction that should be taken metaphorically instead of literally?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Maybe all of it is pure conjecture. Time will tell grumpyantelope.
The 6.1 today will show ya a lil something might just be right after all...
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
Why is that? There has been a 6+ almost every other day for the past week. What makes this one different?
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Location location location-
;) Also that was the mild flare- the x comes later.
1 lockesmadman 2017-09-06
Heres a sign your party is getting started: https://twitter.com/newearthquake/status/905850501731717120
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
;)
1 bradfromearth 2017-09-06
My prediction - Korean peninsula. On the 11-12.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Not a bad one. The 6.3 could have been a foreshock. The area is active in my opinion. I am unaware if their history with +8.0 events.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
That was a nuclear bomb.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I am aware of the news... However seismic is as seismic does. Hence that if it were not a bomb. Then the area would be considered to be geoactive.
Unless you can prove its a bomb. Its good to leave the door open to the plausibility.
1 AdventurePee 2017-09-06
you're wrong... so far
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
important video on event
1 ifrikkenr 2017-09-06
Looking at the latest data and cross-referencing your own theory,
Back here, you posted the basis of what you're looking for
and gave this screen shot as an example: http://imgur.com/a/S8eR9
And now, today we are seeing the current storm upgraded to a G4 class event, Bz/Bt opening up and the solar wind speed increasing. Todays data that I've annotated for everyone:
http://imgur.com/a/NUilr
So, if you are right. This data arguably perfectly matches what you are looking for.
I do accept though that the theory is only that an event is significantly more likely but not guaranteed to occur. I also, as a disclaimer, disgree entirely with your method for determining location and in fact most of your theory of interaction as it is largely non-scientific (location is probability based I get that, but that's not explicitly useful). I do however like and agree with the underlying idea that solar events may trigger earthquakes - though I believe this is only due to placing additonal stress on already stressed areas increasing the likelihood of a rupture. Seismic events are ultimately caused by seismic stress between surfaces and ruptures can and do occur regardless of solar activity, and solar activity does not indicate a rupture will occur.
1 AutoModerator 2017-09-06
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
See thats where I think the magic happens. Magnetic induction via particle absorbtion of the planetary flux tubes. "Like a flower needs being polinated" the magnetosphere likely needs electric charge. Weve recorded pulsations from cmes in flux tubes seeing the same pulsatins in the magnetic field lines that encompasses the magnetosphere. So high voltage absorbtion isnt out of the question. That plasma is made of photons and ions really.
Look at aurorea borealis. So why wouldn't system overloads cause shorts. Like earthquake lights and ruptures. But there is a process between these two events. Earthquakes and seismic data. So why not define a better system of assessment.
1 nitrogene 2017-09-06
Ok considering u just fucking nailed it, could u do an ELI5?
1 TensorBread 2017-09-06
Earth is a giant magnet and when you mess with it's magnetic field it moves around a bit.
1 nitrogene 2017-09-06
And we never noticed this?
1 RR4YNN 2017-09-06
This dude just did.
1 CR7isGOAT 2017-09-06
Are you God?
1 mhouse27 2017-09-06
Are you a virgin??
1 optiglitch 2017-09-06
You are spot on. Don't worry about these guys. Keep doing you brother, I believe in you. I really do.
1 ifrikkenr 2017-09-06
Looking at the data again after the fact, I note these random variations in the speed and density graphs moments before and during the quake (@0449). They don't appear at any other time.
http://imgur.com/a/NL4yj
In fact, zooming out to the 7 day view the anomaly really stands out:
http://imgur.com/a/8yfvM
Wonder if related to the earthquake - if so most likely an emission causing interference with detection equipment. Maybe related to earthquake lights in the sky that can occur independent of electrical malfunction (e.g there are historical records of flashing in the sky during quakes that predates electricity)
It's interesting nonetheless
1 MarcAA 2017-09-06
The energetic particles released by a CME get channelled along the external magnetic flux tubes of Earth?
The particles then transfer energy to the magnetic field? When, in space, atmosphere, or core? How, what EM law governs this conversion? What percentage of the energy is trensferred to the magnetic field instead of the aurora borealis?
Or are you talking direct influence of the suns magnetic field on our core internal dynamo magnetic fields?
1 SlovenlyRetard 2017-09-06
8.0 just hit
1 Mugros 2017-09-06
If I constantly guess lottery numbers and never win but once, can I predict lottery numbers?
1 jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2017-09-06
8.0 just detected near Mexico
1 sirmichaelpatrick 2017-09-06
Woah
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
So literally nowhere near his Japan location
1 th3gentl3man 2017-09-06
Connection to rim of fire?
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Picking the entire rim of fire is just a massive copout.
He basically guessed an earthquake would happen in the most seismically active area in the world. Way to go out on a limb
1 th3gentl3man 2017-09-06
Still gotta give the guy some credit tho.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
No I dont.
1 th3gentl3man 2017-09-06
That's fine. To each their own.
1 znffal 2017-09-06
To be fair he did say "if I had to guess "
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
His whole 'theory' is based around being able to 'predict' them. Part of that is a location.
1 znffal 2017-09-06
Not saying his theory is correct, just pointing out that his prediction was magnitude, his guess was location
1 rareunlimited 2017-09-06
Ah caaammmaaan man. This was good
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
These are his 'predictions'
.
So nowhere near it.
1 rareunlimited 2017-09-06
Fact it happened at all is nuts to me. Wasn't the last 8.0 like 2012 ?
1 zThief 2017-09-06
I predict a 9.0 in San Francisco tomorrow.
1 rareunlimited 2017-09-06
Chill
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
2015.
7.9's in 2016 too
1 WalterMatthau 2017-09-06
Do you even do basic research on things you claim to know?
1 rareunlimited 2017-09-06
The list I was looking at was 8.5 and up.
That's why I asked "wasn't it?" Leaving room to be corrected.
1 jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2017-09-06
Still fair call - he called it.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
No. He didnt
1 brother_nature_ 2017-09-06
Salty
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Why would I be salty?
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
lol! Not only is your demand for an accurate prediction but an accurate location as well. Kind of silly.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
If both can't be predicted, what's the point?
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
The fact that neither can currently be predicted...? This is one step closer... What if everyone gave up after the first tiny success?
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
What if everyone ignored the 20 predictions he got wrong for the one slightly less wrong than the others?
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Sure! Might as well. You obviously can't be convinced. There have been a lot of things invented by man kind that failed before they were successful... Not sure what your point is...
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Those people had demonstrable data/theories - Not just guessing and excuses
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
OP shared his work on his reasoning for his prediction... Newtons Law of universal gravitation is currently understood as theory... http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circles/Lesson-3/Newton-s-Law-of-Universal-Gravitation
When something is in progress in scientific method you are more often wrong than right. I'm not really sure why this has to be explained. OP provided source material for his reasoning for his prediction... If he was truly guess why not post something every single day predicting a earthquake? Your argument is pretty silly.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
OP has posted nothing of his method.
He merely just blathers about science he doesnt understand
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Cool! Whatever you say!
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Feel free to link me to his clearly defined model where he posts the output.
Ill wait.
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Nah, I don't spoon feed people. There is a lot of content on the internet plus /u/ParsingSol has his own subreddit, that you are welcome to review. Obviously if you cared enough to look into it you would have. So I'm not going to feed the troll.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
I have looked
Ive found nothing but feelings, junk science and just not plain understanding what he looks at.
Its ok to admit you cant find it though.
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Sure thing! You win!
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
So cute.
1 jinx__bot 2017-09-06
Jinx! You and Allenba77 posted the same comment at the same time! See their comment here.
I am a bot who is owed many Cokes.
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Thanks! Glad you are bored enough to comment on this instead of being capable of google something as simple as "the sun affects on the earths tectonics plates". But hey understand, not everyone can be as smart as my 9 year old cousin... Keep up those witty comments! They will take you far in life!
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Sure thing! You win!
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Well, I wasn't disappointed.
1 MakaveliRise 2017-09-06
Lmao get a life
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Says the guy this far into a comment thread in a conspiracy thread.
1 WalterMatthau 2017-09-06
"I'm totally wrong but want to appear as if I'm intellectually superior anyway."
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
/u/ParsingSol has a ton of information available for people to read. Google from there. Once I see that some one actually has an interests in learning more, I will throw a ton of content to you to feed your want for more information. But when I see some one with a history of trashing an idea without any concern to learn more, than I'm not going to waste my time on you. Don't fucking label me with your shitty comment, I don't consider myself superior for having researched something because I wanted to learn more.
1 tastygoods 2017-09-06
He actually did call out off the coast of Mexico and other “likely regions” in a comment below.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
The whole of the Pacific Rim is not a specific location
1 So_Very_Awake 2017-09-06
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000ahlq#executive
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
300k south of Japan is off the east coast now?
Also a 6, as opposed to the predicted 8?
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He literally just threw around a bunch of random places. He got lucky. His corrections are always wrong or always thousands of miles away from where he claimed. I'm sick of people being duped by this guy.
1 tastygoods 2017-09-06
Lol nobody’s duped, and the theory itself is almost flatly stupid common sense, really. And as far as I’m concerned, his personal stylisms, if you will, are forgivable, can be corrected, and taught away.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
How is "solar flares cause earthquakes through blah blah flux tubes" common sense?
1 tastygoods 2017-09-06
Probably the same way this earthquake lighting from this exact Mexico earthquake is..
https://mobile.twitter.com/lalocedeno/status/906022311731462144
Hang on, eating a bowl of cereal, but in the mean time can you tell me how earthquakes cause clouds and lighting in the sky?
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/why-do-lights-sometimes-appear-in-the-sky-during-an-earthquake-180948077/
1 tastygoods 2017-09-06
From your very own link, re: earthquake lights, so you’re Smithsonian link is telling me the ion/magnetosphere interacts with rocks in the ground..? You don’t say.. ;)
u/parsingsol should be proud.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
The sun is not in the ionosphere
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
but the particles that the sun emits during a solar flare do end up hitting the ionosphere.
1 WalterMatthau 2017-09-06
Your middle school science teacher should be ashamed.
1 Ribss 2017-09-06
He said Mexico was another likely location. Even thought he wasn't sure of the location he did say Mexico was a possibility.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
He guessed the majority of the most seismically active region in the world.
1 terrorama 2017-09-06
Dude, who took a shit in your cereal?
He's a redditor, mainly active to a specific subreddit, posting thoughts/theories he finds interest in. People en masse aren't dictating their lives on his work and he doesn't claim to be a professional or presenting flawless information. He saw the x9 and other variables he deemed relevant and made a prediction based on a system he believes in / is working on.
Who fucking cares if he didn't name the exact city and time and magnitude and damage done? He claimed an 8.0+ is coming within 7 days and it did.
If it bothers you so much, just piss off. Some people find what he's doing interesting and should that amount to nothing, so be it. It's their choice to be as engaged with it as they like.
If he was on television, broadcasted to millions, claiming all of this to be 100% accurate, I'd be on your side but he's not. It's a hobby of his that may very well start up conversations and influence others to look into the correlation of solar activity and how it affects the earth.
Let him try and let us who enjoy watching him publicly do so, do so.
Chill.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Hes predicted another dozen earthquakes that have been dead wrong.
Why is this one any more than a lucky guess.
1 terrorama 2017-09-06
I'd rather him be public about his predictions, right or wrong, so that I and others can decide for ourselves.
People will cry coincidence, people will cry "a broken clock" but in the end he's trying. If it amounts to nothing in the long run, so be it. If it doesn't, then we'll all be thankful.
I look at what he's doing as net positive either way. If it's a bunch of crock, it's of benefit to us to have it cataloged over time and if it's not and starts others to invest time and conversations to the subject, it's of benefit as well.
Should countless others with theories/ideas they're working on, for a wide array of things, just quit when not regularly accurate from the start?
As I said in my post you probably didn't even read, if it bothers you, just piss off. Some people find this interesting and anyone with a solid head on their shoulders can see that him being so public about it all will only benefit the discussion/idea presented regardless of outcome of his predictions.
I reiterate, chill.
1 terrorama 2017-09-06
I'd rather him be public about his predictions, right or wrong, so that I and others can decide for ourselves.
People will cry coincidence, people will cry "a broken clock" but in the end he's trying. If it amounts to nothing in the long run, so be it. If it doesn't, then we'll all be thankful.
I look at what he's doing as net positive either way. If it's a bunch of crock, it's of benefit to us to have it cataloged over time and if it's not and starts others to invest time and conversations to the subject, it's of benefit as well.
Should countless others with theories/ideas they're working on, for a wide array of things, just quit when not regularly accurate from the start?
As I said in my post you probably didn't even read, if it bothers you, just piss off. Some people find this interesting and anyone with a solid head on their shoulders can see that him being so public about it all will only benefit the discussion/idea presented regardless of outcome of his predictions.
I reiterate, chill.
1 shadowbanyourface 2017-09-06
/u/parsingsol 8.0 in mexico 10 minutes ago 9/8/17
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 shadowbanyourface 2017-09-06
day 1 of 7 day window - nailed a magnitude that's not very common.
but your right. mexico is not nepal.
1 HimalayanDragon 2017-09-06
Should I be worried. I am in Nepal.
1 thelongbow141 2017-09-06
Holy shit. You were right. An 8.0 just hit off the coast of Mexico.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 caelum007 2017-09-06
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6yhv3l/the_ultimate_earthquake_test_is_about_to_commence/dmnmgru/
While Japan was his primary guess he also said it might hit ...
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He literally threw around a bunch of random places dude, most of those are high risk areas too. When he gets the location right with a proper guess I'll be a skeptic
1 videopower 2017-09-06
You're either very obsessed or this makes you upset much more than it should. Get some rest champ, maybe you'll have a better day tomorrow.
1 Snipe812 2017-09-06
Well it happened
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 JeanLucPicardAND 2017-09-06
He said his model wasn't specific enough to pinpoint a location. Japan was a guess.
I think this merits further research.
1 AresIncarnate 2017-09-06
Did this just happen?
1 ST21roochella 2017-09-06
8.0 earthquake off the coast of Mexico tonight bro. Holy shit good call on magnitude
1 tastygoods 2017-09-06
And he also called out Mexico albeit to a probabilistic region and to a lesser degree then Japan, but still he gets a gold ⭐️ for today.
1 untraiined 2017-09-06
he called out 10 areas known for having earthquakes i mean come on...
1 Butteschaumont 2017-09-06
All those areas are next to major faults, where there are earthquakes daily.
1 Mendican 2017-09-06
Sure, but last night was one of the largest in history. Shit happens every day, right?
1 Butteschaumont 2017-09-06
There is about one or two 8.0-9.9 earthquake every year. And a dozen of 7.0-7.9.
1 Mendican 2017-09-06
Now you're completely full of shit.
1 Butteschaumont 2017-09-06
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_earthquakes_in_2017
If you scroll down a bit, you'll see the number of earthquake per year and per magnitude for the past ten years.
1 Mendican 2017-09-06
Pretty sure OP isn't talking about burbs deep in the earth. An 8.1 is a massive quake close to a population center.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_20th-century_earthquakes
1 Butteschaumont 2017-09-06
Well the 8.1 was actually 60km deep and 100km off the coast. But that's not really the point. The point is that if you predict big earthquakes all the time, eventually, and probably sooner than later, you 'll be right. But anyone can do that.
1 xenmate 2017-09-06
I predict a heatwave in the Sahara.
1 CruzAderjc 2017-09-06
I predict the Cleveland Browns having a losing record this season.
1 Nlashb 2017-09-06
The only way this guy could ever be wrong is if there was never an earthquake again. How many weeks can you call an earthquake happening in the next 7 days, never get one, and still be credible? Broken clock is right twice a day.
1 unwarrend 2017-09-06
He predicted an 8-9 magnitude earthquake to occur within 7 days, the frequency of which is once every 5-10 years. Of course, this is probably pure coincidence, but having just been made aware of this sub, my interest is certainly piqued. Could there be a positive correlation between 'some' earthquakes and intense solar activity? If he's on to something, his model and accuracy will improve with time. What is the proposed causal mechanism?
1 Nlashb 2017-09-06
I'm not up to date on his methodology concerning causal mechanisms, I just know from monitoring this guy's "work" that he's frequently predicting these quakes and failing time and time again, which makes it disheartening to see this one held as any sort of confirmation. Not even two weeks ago his later-failing prediction was described by him as one that would completely change his field. As others have stated, if he could apply his method to previous events of high solar activity and show any causality, maybe there would be legitimacy, but failure to do that and his repeated predictive failures makes for a more than skeptical view from me.
1 unwarrend 2017-09-06
Ok. I think I'm starting to get the picture. His methodology is all over the place and his claims are grandiose and overly confident. Not the hallmark of good science. Maybe there is a grain of insight. We'll see. Thanks for the response.
1 Zarathasstra 2017-09-06
Discoveries are made by the people with grandiose ideas, scientists check after the fact.
1 Mugros 2017-09-06
Pure chance.
1 yalpelgoog 2017-09-06
5.3 just hit Japan.
1 tastygoods 2017-09-06
Hah now this thing is going to be exciting, tbh. :D
1 RicardoMayo_ 2017-09-06
It was confirmed to be 8.4. Holy shit.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Koss424 2017-09-06
But maybe Mexico if you read the comment
1 pedrodg28 2017-09-06
Are you a wizard?
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 pedrodg28 2017-09-06
Yeah, but accurately predicted the date and his magnitude range was spot on, so 2 out 3 seems to me like wizard level of prediction.
1 pdxthrowaway42069 2017-09-06
OH FUCK 8.0 IN MEXICO WTF
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 BWet00 2017-09-06
You're really going hard in this thread dropping the same comment. Fuck's your agenda?
1 CoolingEffects 2017-09-06
You were correct
https://youtu.be/EL_2SiAU0Gg
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Danieltsss 2017-09-06
Wow there was just an Earthquake in Mexico right now of 8.0 it felt strong but it was an oscillatory earthquake so it was not destructive here in the city
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Mr_GFreeman 2017-09-06
What in the living fuck?
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Mr_GFreeman 2017-09-06
He said it was a guess, and the fact that the man predicted an Earthquake with this magnitude is impressive by its own. Give him some slack, though it would've been even more incredible if he guessed the location right
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
I'd give him some slack if he got the location right once. This is what he does. Earthquakes happen all the time, when he's "right" he is off by thousands of miles, when he is wrong people still believe him. He isn't predicting anything.
1 Mr_GFreeman 2017-09-06
"Earthquakes happen all the time." So it's just sheer coincidence that this specific one occured after a solar flare? And somehow with the same magnitude. Do you really expect me to believe that? But yeah, man "muh location" meme.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
How the fuck is "muh location" a meme? Is it really such an ask to expect him to not be completely wrong about the location for once?
1 Mr_GFreeman 2017-09-06
Are you really this assblasted just because he had one error with his prediction? I understand he was wrong on that part, but come on.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
"One error"
When that error is pretty fucking important to his prediction, yeah.
1 Mr_GFreeman 2017-09-06
Exactly, one error.
1 rareunlimited 2017-09-06
Are you the guy in Day after tomorrow
1 Dumbolebroad 2017-09-06
Congrats parsingsol! You did it. 8.0 in Mexico
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 rrhinehart21 2017-09-06
Ok, for the next 48 hrs i won't post any negative comments in /r/conspiracy unless they're about the altright.
1 DannyDawg 2017-09-06
wow you called it?
p.s. dont edit your post or people will think youve changed info
1 Thrilllho 2017-09-06
Wow i saw this post last night and i came back when i heard!
1 EvanMcMuffin 2017-09-06
I saved this and came back the second I saw!!!
1 Laser0pz 2017-09-06
A broken clock is right twice a day. If OP is always making predictions and they're never right, doesn't mean it's related the one time it lines up.
1 Infiniteexpression 2017-09-06
Predicting earthquakes is more difficult than predicting the weather. And everyone knows that predicting the weather is nothing more than an educated guess. He has been close multiple times. A broken clock is right once in every 720 times. To compare his prediction to a something that is right %0.013 of the time is not a fair analogy nor does it give him his due credit.
1 borednbrew 2017-09-06
Now it will be interesting to see if the 6.0 comes in CA, seeing as he thought the two were related.
Would be interested in seeing the model he uses to predict this
1 Penoii 2017-09-06
As a Californian, I am not interested to see if the 6.0 comes. But I'll be incredibly impressed lol.
1 TheFox51 2017-09-06
Los Angeles checking in, can confirm .. we aren't interested in any earthquakes. thank you.
1 DJ_Dont_Panic 2017-09-06
Shouldn't have built a city directly on a coastal fault line if you weren't interested in earth quakes.
1 gRod805 2017-09-06
Shouldn't have built anything anywhere
1 dwizzle36 2017-09-06
Dutchsinse has also put the West Coast on watch for a 6.0-6.9 in the next several days for "compensation movement" due to the 8 in Mexico. He is worth checking out, he's been doing this a long time and has his forecasts down pat. He gets it right on a daily basis.
1 marinasyellow 2017-09-06
San Diego here. And an earthquake can fuck right off
1 kingcubfan 2017-09-06
6.0 in Cali is like nothing tho, its when we get into the 7's when the damage starts.
1 bert0ld0 2017-09-06
It actually happened in Japan not long ago! Almost 6.0!
1 bert0ld0 2017-09-06
It happened in Japan! Almost 6!
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 exomniac 2017-09-06
He also said "If I had to guess..."
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 theFunkiestButtLovin 2017-09-06
the data points he based his model off of don't include location in any way. he could only offer his best guess like anyone else for location.
1 WalterMatthau 2017-09-06
So his best guess was no better than a layperson's then? Which would mean all of the data he is collecting is utterly unrelated to earthquake prediction? Oh wait, this is rere central where the absence of fact is actually proof. You people are so sad.
1 Quimpers 2017-09-06
Damn
1 primo_pastafarian 2017-09-06
Aye. Good prediction, OP.
Now, do it again.
1 Sinn_Fein_32 2017-09-06
Pretty sure OP just dropped his mic. Unreal.
1 King_Offa 2017-09-06
holy fuck
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2017-09-06
I did a remind me for 7v days and here I am following up sooner. The mechanisms of our solar system are being calculated by independents.
1 theFunkiestButtLovin 2017-09-06
academia is broken. makes sense.
1 qwenjwenfljnanq 2017-09-06
OP calls an Earthquake like once a week.
1 theFunkiestButtLovin 2017-09-06
could you source that? people keep saying this, but it would be a lot clearer with examples that didn't correlate to small quakes.
1 Th3_Admiral 2017-09-06
Here's one predicting an 8.0 in Nepal due to the eclipse.
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6uly2k/a_bad_feeling_about_this_eclipse_guys
Which sort of morphed into this one predicting the largest quake of 2016-2017. It was supposed to follow some massive solar activity that was 100% guaranteed a sure sign of a really big upcoming quake. His 36 hour window passed with no major quakes at all.
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6vkmhl/if_i_am_right_about_this_then_i_just_changed_the
Here's one for a 7.0+ quake in New Zealand that I don't think ever happened either.
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6s6o42/65_70_earthquake_5_day_warning_new_zealand
These are just his three most recent predictions. You'd have to dig a bit further to find one before last night's that was even close to accurate.
1 theFunkiestButtLovin 2017-09-06
Gotcha. I think op might be a nut job, but the model op developed might have some merit. Check my other comment in this thread (I'll link it up shortly) for my opinion on the matter.
1 dwizzle36 2017-09-06
Check out the Dutchsinse live stream. He forecasts EQ's that occur on a daily basis, even small ones.
1 ExTractorFan 2017-09-06
Furthermore there are hundreds of earthquakes every day all over the world. Admittedly an 8.0 is an exceptional one, but it's only one correlation point in a large number of predictions and quakes.
1 bri9and 2017-09-06
Do you realize there are hundreds of earthquakes a day but 8.0 quakes are rare and he called it.
1 qwenjwenfljnanq 2017-09-06
Yes, but he also called an 8.0 literally last week.
1 caleb675 2017-09-06
Yeah dude, where the fuck are all these doubters coming from? Like all these comments are massively upvoted as well. I think Wittgenstein had a good point when he said "The limits of my language mean the limits of my world." I think people are so defensive in the comment section literally because the name of this subreddit is telling them that this is a conspiracy.
1 WalterMatthau 2017-09-06
I've seen you on /r/Steelers. Now I understand why your posts there are so abysmally stupid.
1 bri9and 2017-09-06
Such hate.. go outside and get some fresh air
1 PM_ME_A_FACT 2017-09-06
Except actual real scientist had predicted this as well. Even a broke clock is right twice a day.
1 ORDub 2017-09-06
In his edited post?
1 Mugros 2017-09-06
He called others and was wrong.
1 Opan_IRL 2017-09-06
Nastrodamus confirmed
1 TheEarthquakeGuy 2017-09-06
No he didn't. He's made a number of false predictions for sometime. Eventually he was going to get it 'right'.
He predicted the wrong area, and gave a range of a large earthquake.
He hasn't used historic data to validate his theory.
Please understand this for what is it is;
A fluke
Misinformation like this post, dutchsinse etc claim to have abilities to predict these events, which people flock to because of how scary it can be. I understand that. I really do because I used to be like that before I realised how bullshit that was.
Unfortunately, it's fear mongering. It's causing constant concern and in the end, when nothing happens, it can create disbelief in the actual dangers of these events.
So again, he didn't call it, he got lucky.
1 kulkarniravi 2017-09-06
Incredible!
1 CHU_LO 2017-09-06
yea holy shit wow!
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 topper_reppot 2017-09-06
In before holy shit nice job, how in the hell did you get this one
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Dumbolebroad 2017-09-06
Congrats parsingsol! You're onto something here! 8.0 in Mexico. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000ahv0#executive
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 queenx 2017-09-06
He said these are common libations for earthquakes of this magnitude, that's why he guessed both. But if you look at his comments he mentioned other potential places too, obliging Mexico. Pretty much a guess based on historical data.
1 ObamaBigBlackCaucus 2017-09-06
r u jesus
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 niirvana 2017-09-06
Right on.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 under_thesun 2017-09-06
youre trying too hard dude lol
1 maxbobpierre 2017-09-06
This guy fucking nailed it. http://news.trust.org/item/20170908050116-wvzxh
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 another1956 2017-09-06
Fuck dude! 8.0 Oaxaca, Mx. Congratulations on a good call.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 MilkCarton78 2017-09-06
Holy shit guys
1 GetOutOfBox 2017-09-06
Y'all are in here celebrating his "victory" when he originally said Mexico City (this is in the gulf over 500 miles away) and had said that in addition to 7 other places all over the globe.
You have pretty low standards to be impressed by that. If he can pull it off repeatedly, then he's on to something, but so far he has been wrong every single time, and was "close" this one time.
1 lakerswiz 2017-09-06
His comments elsewhere say Japan and Nepal
1 DVD-RW 2017-09-06
DAMN SON
1 mistaroundmountains 2017-09-06
Mexico
1 Whereswallythistime 2017-09-06
To be fair the media has just reported an 8.0 off the coast in Mexico
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 J-MRP 2017-09-06
I was here
1 STARCHILD_J 2017-09-06
I was also here.
1 usernamechecksoout 2017-09-06
They were here.
1 imbellish2 2017-09-06
wat
1 AddyPickaxe 2017-09-06
Reddit gold for all
1 alienigenasfaltosdea 2017-09-06
!RedditSilver
1 xenonsupra 2017-09-06
Dickbutt
1 PM_ME_UR_SUBARU 2017-09-06
Username checks out
1 l---------l 2017-09-06
We were here.
1 roflocalypselol 2017-09-06
Roaming on the endless prairie.
1 YungBaseGod 2017-09-06
He was also here
1 gschamot 2017-09-06
I was not here ssh...
1 Man-alive 2017-09-06
I wasn't.
1 So_Very_Awake 2017-09-06
Posting in an epic thread.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 McLove_ano 2017-09-06
He guessed tho
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
Not much of a model if he never "guesses" the location right
1 sweaty_clitoris 2017-09-06
He mentioned Mexico City in one of his comments.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
Along with a bunch of other random locations he threw out
1 rocinaut 2017-09-06
Hi mom!!
1 SpeziZer0 2017-09-06
i am here
1 alienigenasfaltosdea 2017-09-06
Include me in the screenshot
1 JelloDarkness 2017-09-06
I'm still here.
1 dbhanger 2017-09-06
And after they were able to predict an earthquake every 6 years, humanity was never the same.
1 undefinedminded 2017-09-06
We...were here...
1 EM34GE 2017-09-06
We were here
1 InOPWeTrust 2017-09-06
Présent.
1 EvanMcMuffin 2017-09-06
An 8.1 just hit off the coast of Mexico...
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Adda717 2017-09-06
That happened.
1 Lynxes_Hearit 2017-09-06
You did it. You deserve it. This is where it gets really interesting.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Lynxes_Hearit 2017-09-06
You're right about that. What fascinates me is the fact that less than 24h after his prediction there was a huge earthquake. Pinpointing locations is tricky, we're just a tiny planet in a big universe. I didn't expect him to be spot on, I do find it very interesting that he was right this time.
1 No_Loli_No_Life 2017-09-06
Gg
1 cb75 2017-09-06
dude..
1 oscarmtz88 2017-09-06
he actually did it
1 Rolobox 2017-09-06
The absolute madman
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Sharpest_Balloon 2017-09-06
Well.
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/pt17251000#executive
1 Loud_Volume 2017-09-06
/u/parsingsol
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/6yspm7/magnitude_80_earthquake_strikes_off_the_coast_of/
8.0 just hit Mexico
1 AutoModerator 2017-09-06
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Yesnoman1994 2017-09-06
He said he was not sure that was his guess. But he did say it was going to be a easy 8 . and it happened less then a day after. This guys knows his shit. No way he can be exact on location but he did know it was gana happen.
1 JawsIsReal 2017-09-06
Hahahah look how many people gave you shit. Unbelievable OP. I appreciate the work
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 lapride7 2017-09-06
Lmao getting downvoted for stating the truth. These idiots think he's a god haha
1 JawsIsReal 2017-09-06
He said if he'd have to guess. Go read the thread champ
1 Mugros 2017-09-06
Got to ove gullible people.
1 Aquaspindle 2017-09-06
Oh my god, an 8.2 earthquake just hit. Legit?!
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Aquaspindle 2017-09-06
He also said "if I had to guess" before that. I'd say accurately predicting an 8.0 earthquake within a week timeframe is pretty impressive in and itself
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
You clearly don't follow this guy. This is what he does. He throws around vague locations or no locations, and even when he's wrong, he claims he's right. Earthquakes happen all the time, he isn't predicting anything.
1 Aquaspindle 2017-09-06
I don't, but I'll try to keep an eye on that sub from now. Might be on to something, you never know right?
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
If he was on to something we would know by now. He's never gotten the location of one of these correct.
1 Demo7788 2017-09-06
Seriously u/le_united_sucks obviously has a vendetta against this guy, he has commented on every recent comment. The truth is that parsingsol chose not to give an answer for location (he said in main post? until prompted (in comments.) I'm not claiming the guy is a prophet but it's definitely a possibility that he's on to something and just hasn't quite figured out how to pinpoint the events.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He doesn't give a location because he can't, because his model is bullshit
1 Demo7788 2017-09-06
Dude you are in r/conspiracy, if you don't like his posts don't read them, but mass commenting is ridiculous. If his models suck let others reach that conclusion themselves.
1 PM-ME-YOUR-CONCERN 2017-09-06
8.2 earthquakes happen "all the time"?.....are you intentionally trying to be thick?
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
What about all the other earthquakes where he got the location and dates wrong?
1 Beezlegorp 2017-09-06
You were spot on man.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Green_Splat2 2017-09-06
holy shit dude you were right! You're onto something. If you could consistently predict earthquakes you could save millions. Keep on working!
1 CallMeDende 2017-09-06
Here's your 8.0!
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/09/08/americas/earthquake-hits-off-the-coast-of-southern-mexico/index.html
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 MessiLovesCR7 2017-09-06
You keep posting this why?
1 spatchi14 2017-09-06
this is fucking trippy
1 telaelit 2017-09-06
Oh my god, you were fucking right!!! https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/09/08/americas/earthquake-hits-off-the-coast-of-southern-mexico/index.html
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 telaelit 2017-09-06
I don’t care, what if it’s not a fluke and he predicts another one, then he can work on narrowing down where the earthquakes will be. It’s just amazing (or extremely lucky) that he was able to predict an earthquake at all.
1 The-Devilz-Advocate 2017-09-06
Dude. The fuck.
1 4702four11 2017-09-06
why didn't you predict a location this time?
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He did. Japan or Nepal. Where coincidentally, this earthquake was nowhere near.
1 cb75 2017-09-06
I read it was updated to 8.4
1 bradfromearth 2017-09-06
Boom - 8.1 off Mexico
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Demo7788 2017-09-06
He didn't want to give a location until prompted. He obviously knows that part of his method is off.
1 IncreasedMetronomy 2017-09-06
There was a 6.1 in Japan too.
1 slayer3294 2017-09-06
Stop predicting this shit man! I'm trying to sleep and this 8.0 just woke me up and told me to get back on Reddit.... (El Salvador)
1 TCanada808 2017-09-06
Is it possible for a solar flare large enough for you to tell me what happens on the next season of game of thrones
1 ResistAuthority 2017-09-06
People die
1 horrorsystem 2017-09-06
Sadly but also immediately that news of the earthquake reminded me of you .You !!!!!! You are genuine!!!!!!
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He's not. He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 pilla99 2017-09-06
He said he would not give a predicted location this time.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
Because he can't. Because he can't predict these.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
But he gave several locations over multiple posts anyway.
Harder to disregard people calling bullshit on you when you dont give a location
1 horrorsystem 2017-09-06
I believe he's genuine. I'm spooked and still thinking that it's not even the matter of the location. Because range of the magnitudes and time span was correct , right ? And he said he wouldn't give the location this time? ( I had no clue at the moment about it though)Then I think he was right.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
So why was his last 'biggest earthquake of 2017' prediction completely wrong?
1 horrorsystem 2017-09-06
Honestly I have no clue... but I think this time was legit.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Why this one in particular?
What happens when the next one is bullshit?
1 horrorsystem 2017-09-06
I really don't know. Don't ask me please:(. Ask him .
1 horrorsystem 2017-09-06
Oh , it's my bad. Thank you for noticing me. Because I'm currently in Japan..... :(
1 pilla99 2017-09-06
Confirmed for prophet
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 ArchitectOfLove 2017-09-06
I'm spooked right now
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 PurelyReckless 2017-09-06
10+ exact replies. Bravo.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
Surely this constitutes as spam right?
1 Daedalus- 2017-09-06
Friday September 8 2017, 04:49:17 UTC: SSW of Tres Picos, Mexico - 8.0
http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com
Well done!
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 MilkyWitness 2017-09-06
My boi /u/parsingsol!! Those flux tubes are sure reacting as we had predicted my friend. Great stuff.
1 Scroon 2017-09-06
Well shit...
Earthquake of magnitude 8.1 strikes off Mexico's Pacific coast
You called it /u/ParsingSol. I'm giving this one to you, and I'm a skeptic!
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Inconsequent 2017-09-06
Dude, you seriously need to chill out. You just made the same post like 40 times.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
Because I'm sick of people being duped by this, and I saw a comment in /r/news that would lead people here. The guy never gets the location right, why should we believe him?
1 Inconsequent 2017-09-06
I get that, but to make that many replies is bordering on obsession.
1 HuginochMunin 2017-09-06
This is a heavily shilled platform with both paid posters and bots.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
They take like 2 seconds each dude
1 tastygoods 2017-09-06
Obsession or paycheck..
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
more like jealousy, dude predicted an 8.0 earthquake and lo and behold a day later 8.0 using nothing but the fact that there was a solar flare.
1 Scroon 2017-09-06
Didn't he say this in the post?
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
And then posted 3 or 4 sets of locations, one of which was vague enough to be 'accurate'
1 Scroon 2017-09-06
Oh, I see the comment post now. Thanks for explaining.
But look at the context, he's not saying "It's going to be here!". Rather:
Basically, he's saying to just consider those locations...and turns out Mexico City is actually a hit.
By itself, the location data could be seen as a broad guess, but you have to factor in that he also called the magnitude and timing pretty darned well.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
That is basically guessing the entirity of the most seismically active area in the world.
1 Scroon 2017-09-06
Yeah, but again:
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-09-06
He said if he had to GUESS. He never 100% was on where at.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
He was way specific on where:
8.3 east fukushima namie predecture. Associated tsunami. Wave heights of 2.3 meters. Depth 33km-56km Or 8.2 Nepal (central Himalayan ridge). Depth 28km-90km
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-09-06
[–]ParsingSol[F,S] 68 points 1 day ago If I had to guess East coast, Japan.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
Twice in this thread:
"Note this is assessment based on observation. Its literally a theory. Not to be confused with guessing"
"I wouldn't say I am guessing."
1 Faelar 2017-09-06
Looks like this man here was right.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 Faelar 2017-09-06
You cannot pin an earthquakes location based off solar activity. Mere predictions from him, basically everything else was spot on.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Cant predict one will happen either but that doesnt stop OP trying
1 keegan_ryan_ 2017-09-06
Damn congrats.
1 Novusod 2017-09-06
Up vote
Up vote
Up vote
He was right
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 PM-ME-YOUR-CONCERN 2017-09-06
Who cares. Timing an 8.0 earthquake to the very week it would happen must be 1 in 10,000 odds
1 lolmonsterlol 2017-09-06
He does it by probability. He doesn't have this part down yet. But he freaking did it!
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He didn't freaking do anything. He gives vague times and incorrect locations and people eat it up. It's ridiculous.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
Done more then you, princess
1 bigboyy23 2017-09-06
Hello internet historians!
1 lolmonsterlol 2017-09-06
It happened! Mexico 8.0.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 lolmonsterlol 2017-09-06
Can you stop. He has explained many times that this is all about probability.
You are so annoying. Can't you rejoice in something?
1 brittleknight 2017-09-06
Now the science has to catch up.. is it just gravitational waves or nutrinos heating induction plates
1 JTM1218 2017-09-06
Are there really like 50 of the same comments in here trying their hardest to discredit a cool prediction w/ research put in and factual info? Like, sure it may not be an exact science, but who shit in your cereal to the point where you HAVE to win this?
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
It's not a prediction because his locations are never right. When he gets a location right I'll give him the benefit of the doubt
1 JWalterW 2017-09-06
Who gives a shit if you give him the benefit of the doubt? Your opinion is irrelevant, despite the fact that you've posted the exact same comment no less than 40 times in this thread alone. Give it a rest, crazy ex-girlfriend.
1 JTM1218 2017-09-06
But replying to EVERY post on here? Merely saying, "Hey man, wow, nice work you've been paying attention and that work seems to have paid off slightly in this moment!" and you have to spend your night replying to comments with the SAME comment?
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
Literally 10 minutes maximum
1 JTM1218 2017-09-06
Literally doesn't come across that way.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
He just jelly bro
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
There is minimal research and factual info.
It was only a week ago someone had to make him a chart to even attempt to show correlation.
If he was doing actual research he wouldve done that years ago
1 JTM1218 2017-09-06
I don't know about all yalls history or whatever, but I was only mentioning how in this, whether it minor or major successful call, there are a lot of seemingly sour people. I mean, he said it would happen, however he got there, and it did. That's what people are reacting to.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Im not sour.
If this was his first prediction, Id be interested too.
This is his umpteenth prediction.
Literally last week we were going to see the 'Biggest Earthquake in 2017', and his reasons for it not happening are the eclipse and 'time dilation'
Hes a snake oil salesman and it amazes me how many people take him seriously.
1 JTM1218 2017-09-06
I understand where you're coming from, and honestly my initial comment was mainly directed at the MANY identical comments from the other guy, but me having not known what all else the guy's done limits me from going much further. I just thought it was silly how it appeared like a guy is just trying to use a form of research and pass along what he thinks it means, and then met with repeated backlash.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
If it was research, thatd be fine too.
The.problem is he either has no, or refused to publish a, concrete model, nor has any data correlating his predictions to actual events. All i see is tenuous explanations as to why they dont occur (Time Dilation/Eclipse/etc), Vague grasps on location (Where either the locations cover virtually the whole ring of fire, or thousands of km away is 'accurate'), and just a plain misunderstanding of the data he claims to interpret.
This is all masked behind excuses of not having enough money, or the technology to apparently form a basic verifiable model.
1 JTM1218 2017-09-06
Again, I think a lot of folks here are simply seeing that what was said would happen did, and that he's getting props. Whether the rest is bullshit is up in the air, but I mean, we ARE in r/Conspiracy right?? This isn't r/Science for 100% set in stone data, but maybe that's just me looking too into subreddit names lol. I feel you're more about shielding people from false truths, and in that I'd see what you were setting out to do.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Im just amazed that everyone is so ready to jump unboard this theory when its been so wrong so many times
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
Im just amazed at how fucking salty you are.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Why am I salty.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
I've never seen a more toxic and negative individual on here then you.
Explain why this means SO much to you that you would comment numerous times denigrating /u/parsingsol.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Because his theory is complete and utter horseshit and I do not understand why he still has any credibility.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
Maybe you're just real dumb
1 BCtoPEI 2017-09-06
This is the 2nd time I've seen a prediction like this based on solar activity though in the past year or two. So there's that.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Revised and still wrong
1 BCtoPEI 2017-09-06
Yeah I'm not saying it was this guy, I'm saying I remember seeing another thread like this. I know if you throw enough darts one might finally hit, but still, it's interesting when it happens. I could make 500 predictions and probably never get one right.
1 thesquash707 2017-09-06
Just honestly wondering, because I looked up this guy as soon as I saw the earthquake and he predicted it right again, could you take 10 predictions and get two earthquakes right within days even hours and correct magnitude to prove this guy is wrong? A broke clock is right twice a day but at what point is a person more right than broke clock twice a day? I never visit this somewhat awful sub but this is the second time this guy's been right in like six months and I think it's pretty incredible. And every time there are people acting like they could predict earthquakes if they had ten or fifteen quesses
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
No there arent. There are just people disputing OPs ability to do it
1 thesquash707 2017-09-06
Right and they're assuming it's just random but if I randomly guessed when an earthquake would be you really think I could guess magnitude and within hours/days of an earthquake? I passed this guy's posts months ago and his prediction was right on but of course he was wrong on the location, needs some work there. But you really think there's no correlation between solar events and his predictions at this point? I'm guessing there's a third factor he's not aware of that makes his predictions seem off because he can't tell when the two combine to create an event but he appears to either be really good at guessing or on to something. I was wondering if he guesses so often that anyone could get it right or if he's on to a single factor that could create geological events like this one. Everyone just seems so sure he's wrong or right its hard to tell if it's random or not.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
If there is he has no idea what it is.
If his theory was right why have the last 10 all been bullshit?
If everyones wants to cherry pick his 'predictions' and ignore the ones that have all been blatantly wrong, All power to them.
1 thesquash707 2017-09-06
There's definitely a problem with his model I was just wondering if anyone could duplicate his results at random and if not then how is he accurate at all or ever.
1 Mugros 2017-09-06
Science, where you wing it.
1 thisisnotmyreality 2017-09-06
HOLY SHEET!
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000ahv0#executive
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 PM-ME-YOUR-CONCERN 2017-09-06
You are one salty motherfucker.
1 thisisnotmyreality 2017-09-06
He predicted a fucking earthquake! That's pretty insane. Yes, it's not perfect, but, it's a start.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
No he didnt.
1 thisisnotmyreality 2017-09-06
There was a magnitude 8.1 Earthquake. How is that NOT a prediction?
1 Mr_GFreeman 2017-09-06
The dude just keeps posting the same thing over and over. Not worth your time.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Throwing shit at a wall and seeing what sticks isnt a prediction.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
Done more then you bud
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
Ive wasted a lot less time on not being able to predict earthquakes
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
But wasted more time commenting on people congratulating him on a successful prediction. He predicted the magnitude and gave a time frame using nothing but the fact that there was solar flare activity.
1 NZImmo 2017-09-06
And the last dozens times were what?
Just a practice?
Keep burying your head in the sand.
1 Frosty4l5 2017-09-06
Well played OP, you shut down the doubters
1 PurelyReckless 2017-09-06
Holy shit.
1 BWet00 2017-09-06
This fucking guy is on one. H/t u/parsingsol
1 clearedasfiled 2017-09-06
Who's laughing now?
1 Masterfu11 2017-09-06
Shit. You were right. 8.1 quake off the coast of Mexico today
1 Destiny_Ocello 2017-09-06
CALLED IT.
To all the deniers, HA!!!!
1 TaigaAisakaSB 2017-09-06
fuck lol
1 pandalord415 2017-09-06
I was here
1 AdventurePee 2017-09-06
not for long
1 tavich 2017-09-06
Holy shit you were right...
1 Quimpers 2017-09-06
Well. That happened
1 noxion 2017-09-06
Amazing.
1 Sendmyabar 2017-09-06
ITT: Neckbeards eating humble pie.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
paid your debt yet?
1 Pomandres 2017-09-06
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxEr34iHs7s
1 U83HgA64g5RqqzNb1 2017-09-06
Well done!
1 presaging 2017-09-06
We still haven't had the largest CME strike yet. And before United comments--he said he wouldn't have a location prediction this time.
1 xByron 2017-09-06
Look at his post history... I understand he called it and all... but I mean come on.. if I kept guessing if an earthquake would appear and kept saying it over and over, it's bound to happen eventually....
Just like when these sunspots appeared...I could have made a post saying that "X-Class solar flares will hit earth in the next few days" but it'd be a shot in the dark. Say they didn't hit earth, ok, next time I wait for a sunspot to appear and keep calling it out again and again until something DOES happen. That's like this post with your "bz" and "breach data", every time it gets higher you say an earthquake is going to happen and eventually keep going until it hits the target. Now that you found your shot, you are going to keep telling yourself "Damn, I'm right, there's something to this model!" and when you fail your next one you are just gonna say "Huh well it was right before, probably just needs some adjusting" and continue on with your predictions.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
salty
1 xByron 2017-09-06
Not sure you understand what salty means. I wasn't mad or upset, just trying to cause a differentiating opinion in a post full of conformation bias lol. After all, we wouldn't have the correct data/science on anything without another point of view or opposing opinions.
You though, seem like your salty because you see my point of view but like I said, this post is full of confirmation bias so you will continue to double down on what you believe in because confronting someone about their opinion only seems to make it stronger.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
yeah i was right
you salty
1 xByron 2017-09-06
And I was right.
Your just a troll, I had no need to respond. My bad.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
All good, I got my laugh.
1 xByron 2017-09-06
I was laughing at your post in r/amiugly until you deleted it.
1 CCM4Life 2017-09-06
turns out you have to be actually ugly for posts to remain up there :(
1 Todos1881 2017-09-06
OP's model still has to be on the right track in my opinion.
1 dabadguycr 2017-09-06
Read closer hes got almost ever prediction right. Maybe not in the right country but location and within the days he said one would happen... Including the mag.
1 FinalTricks 2017-09-06
Trials and error my guy there is no problem with him adjusting and adjusting. He will reach a point where there is no more adjustments needed and it will show if there is really something to it or not. So why try to demean his work?
1 xByron 2017-09-06
I at first thought this post had some legitimacy but then I got skeptical. I'm not demeaning the work... any work is open to criticism via opinion, and like I stated to someone else's reply, without opposing facts or opinions; science would never get anywhere. Take physics for example, our current understanding of it is changing of it all the time because of people's view on how things work.
Also you can't even prove this model works off 1 prediction coming true based on the model... after many predictions preceded it. Any sort of experiment has to go through so much trial and error to have any conclusive data/evidence. I'm just trying to say, you can't take something like this and call it "proof" after many failed predictions before this. I'm not saying no there's nothing behind this guys prediction, but what I am saying is that this is %100 not proof and could just be a lucky guess.
1 FinalTricks 2017-09-06
Fully agree I'm not saying it's 100% accurate. I'm just saying let the man make his adjustments and reach the conclusion that the data will come too. If it works good helps us out to potentially predict seismic activity if it doesn't work then we move on or it can potentially lead to something else.
1 fuzzfpv 2017-09-06
TIL: Nostradamus is still alive.
1 Bayasabhad 2017-09-06
holy fuck
1 jack34103410 2017-09-06
Holy fuck worldwide devastation
1 randomredditor87 2017-09-06
Wow you called it!
1 WHYHRUDOINDAT 2017-09-06
This post is getting downvoted to oblivion. Why?
1 CellSeat 2017-09-06
Because "science sucks" according to all the boys, shills and neckbeards that infest this site, and political shit fights are now the heart and soul of reddit.
(I'm just as pissed off as you are, this is front page material!!)
1 CellSeat 2017-09-06
*bots ... not "boys"!
(FUCK you auto correct!)
1 j0e_the_an0n 2017-09-06
Definately groundbreaking stuff. Have been watching his threads for a while now. Good question why is it being downvoted and also as scientific theory is being tested. Possible connection to electro-magnetic energy / force between the sun /earth and earth itself? Tesla seemed to think so.
1 Mugros 2017-09-06
Because it is BS. Well, the whole sub is anyway.
1 mayavision 2017-09-06
either this is pure coincidence, you got lucky or you've just accomplished something incredible.
1 BbqLurker 2017-09-06
Is it not plausible that a large CME could push and warp the magnetosphere causing gravitational shifts inside the earth resulting in quakes?
1 bert0ld0 2017-09-06
So we can say to have found a pattern? I am really impressed here and I refuse to think it's only a coincidence
1 flatcheetah 2017-09-06
Wow and you were actually right
1 MrBigBalls88 2017-09-06
Fuck I saw this post last night. Wtf how
1 jayro08 2017-09-06
Damn a 6.1 of the coast of Japan followed by an 8.1 in Mexico... you might be on to something here. Maybe post your work under a sub that is not conspiracy, this sounds like math and science to me.
1 under_thesun 2017-09-06
source for japan??
1 Xxpussy-destroyerxX 2017-09-06
japan gets earthquakes everyday
1 wild_bill94 2017-09-06
Wtf 😳
1 p71interceptor 2017-09-06
I was here
1 under_thesun 2017-09-06
i was hear
1 wild_bill94 2017-09-06
This is pretty amazing, despite the obvious awful consequences, but this is like good for science right? There's an obvious positive correlation.
Huge flare up and now 4 hurricanes an earthquake, PNW on fire, dormant volcano? Wtf am I reaching here?
1 IncreasedMetronomy 2017-09-06
Earthquakes in Japan, 6.1; and Idaho, 5.3; as well.
PNW fires don't seem like natural disasters the same way everything else are. Sure, wildfires are classified as natural disasters, but they were initially started by humans. While the PNW fires are extremely significant, I doubt they have any connection to OPs post and theory.
But the hurricanes and earthquakes, feels very likely.
1 dabadguycr 2017-09-06
Holy fuck!!! Dude nailed it.
1 Todos1881 2017-09-06
Holy shit.....
1 dustractor 2017-09-06
Mad I tell ya
1 logicblocks 2017-09-06
Somebody give this man a grant and the means to do his research!
1 CMPluto 2017-09-06
Hey uh...Cali's gonna be okay, right? Right??
1 kuuuurija 2017-09-06
HOLY SHIT [5}
1 47dniweR 2017-09-06
I'm happy for you u/parsingsol. It appears you've done something truely amazing. I hope you save countless lives and get very rich. If I had money I'd invest in you.
Pretty sure I just witnessed someone with almost no resources, change the world... Incredible.
1 lapride7 2017-09-06
Are you really that fucking stupid lmao? He always makes predictions that fail. This is a coincidence. And he guessed it to be in japan not Mexico. You idiots are really on his nuts without correct information lol. He's not some genius.
1 pedrodg28 2017-09-06
We get it, you're jealous and you hate, this a conspiracy forum you idiot, fails don't matter, wining is everything
1 x0diego0x 2017-09-06
Nice call.
1 BurgerUSA 2017-09-06
DELET THIS!!!!
1 alienigenasfaltosdea 2017-09-06
This changes everything...
1 shark2pus 2017-09-06
Would this possibly explain the claims of "earthquake lights" if these quakes are caused by solar events?
1 duckshooter 2017-09-06
Your theory explains this phenomenon:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_light
1 rigorousintuition 2017-09-06
The legend is at it again!
Keep up the good work /u/parsingsol - you are pioneering a new science!
1 Sunakujira1 2017-09-06
What sorcery is this.
1 Diactylmorphinefiend 2017-09-06
Correlation does not equal causation.
1 SnugMeatSocks 2017-09-06
Good call OP
1 lapride7 2017-09-06
Lmfao people are actually impressed by this? Holy fuck. This guy makes many predictions in which 99% fail. He even guessed like 10 areas where this 8-9.5 earthquake will strike. And now it happens in Mexico and idiots think he's a genius or something? Lol. Now if he keeps calling them correctly then I'll be impressed. This is luck and not hard to do considering he makes predictions every day lol
1 cb75 2017-09-06
Welcome to conspiracy
This is a forum for free thinking and discussing issues which have captured the public’s imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goals are a fairer, more transparent world and a better future for everyone.
1 zkgkilla 2017-09-06
So I guess we gotta kneel now?
1 denverwind1 2017-09-06
I hope you don't get a visit from the Men In Black, You really did a great job
1 lapride7 2017-09-06
He isn't credible. He is just making stuff up, taking credit for random hits and ignoring all the times he was wrong. There are lots of earthquakes all the time, globally speaking, and he is trying to take credit for coincidence.
1 oxide-NL 2017-09-06
How often does one occur of the 8.0 magnitude?
He didn't say "A earth quick" but rather specific between 8.0 ~9.5
Thats pretty darn accurate
1 scvl 2017-09-06
About one 8.0+ M earthquake per year
1 FooHentai 2017-09-06
One or two each year. How often does this guy make predictions? About once a week, going on the past month of his reddit threads.
https://np.reddit.com/user/ParsingSol/submitted/
It's exactly as lapride7 says, a broken clock is right twice a day.
1 Butteschaumont 2017-09-06
If you predict a 8.0 - 9.5 earthquake within the next 7 days everyweek, you have 100% of getting right at leats once a year.
Given his history of predictions, he isn't that far off.
1 pedrodg28 2017-09-06
He predicted an 8.0 earth quake within a 7 days time frane on a specific date, a year has 365, his prediction was damn accurate
1 Butteschaumont 2017-09-06
Again, if that was his first prediction yeah it would seem like an accurate model. But he predicted big earthquakes many many times in the past months, and always got it wrong. If I guess a dice number 1 time out of 6, would you say I'm a math genius?
1 Beltrev_Montor 2017-09-06
he likely works at HAARP they caused this not the sun
1 oxide-NL 2017-09-06
Ok ok..
There is a change of coincidence. Or your model actually works
Idk i'm no Seismology/Astronomer
But I'm intrigued non the less
1 Yhellow 2017-09-06
Congrats, man! :)
1 skitz2008 2017-09-06
As soon as I heard about it i came back here.... is there an actual link here or is it a coincidence?
1 tibetan_astronaut 2017-09-06
u/666mountains
1 Integrated-99 2017-09-06
Toasting in epic bread
1 DaveMeltzer5S 2017-09-06
just came here for the mandatory ‘holy shit gg dude’
1 Birdinhandandbush 2017-09-06
Well done.
1 Floydhead666 2017-09-06
The fun thing about r/conspiracy is that coincidence in itself is a conspiracy
1 makki08 2017-09-06
I really hope that we have just discovered the best earthquake-prediction model and I wish it gets named after you, OP, just to shut the naysayers up. Good job!
1 onetwolowkick 2017-09-06
Aurora like lights above Mexico during 8.1 earthquake.
https://www.rt.com/news/402432-earthquake-lights-mexico-city/
1 d121212 2017-09-06
Fascinating!
1 joshmaaaaaaans 2017-09-06
I just witnessed a god in action.
1 CellSeat 2017-09-06
Thank you for bringing back genuine THOUGHT to r/conspiracy ... hope you are ready for an AMA and your 5minutes of Reddit fame!!?!
(It saddens me that reddit is such a political bitch fest lately, that this is the only sub for posts like yours!)
1 felio_ 2017-09-06
So you are a scientist or nostradamus or something? Woah dude
1 IncreasedMetronomy 2017-09-06
There was a 6.1 off Japan's Bonin Islands yesterday, so close prediction on location. You seriously called the 8.0-8.2 off the coast of Mexico though.
1 osm0sis 2017-09-06
Kinda surprised you're not on some math/geology/physics sub. If you're on to something, it would be cool to make it open source.
1 btao 2017-09-06
Holy hell batman.
1 zep2floyd 2017-09-06
Awesome. Do you think there could be more this week?
1 Solidarity365 2017-09-06
Saw this post yesterday and thought. Yeah I don't think so man. Woke up today and my face was like this
1 okhosting 2017-09-06
You are the guy Im following from now on, regarding earthquakes, good job!
1 IraqiGovernment-Lies 2017-09-06
Screen cap me
1 xXBalanceXx 2017-09-06
Are you global hell, by anychance???
1 ReallyBigShow 2017-09-06
Holy shit you were fucking right
1 sensimaniak 2017-09-06
Please PM me tonight's Mega Millions numbers. Thank you kindly and God bless you.
1 ROLLIN_DUBS 2017-09-06
Have you crunched any numbers to help your equation out from this good prediction to your other massive failure predictions? Have you found a missing variable yet?
1 HimalayanDragon 2017-09-06
Holy fuck. I saw the news and thought of you.
1 theFunkiestButtLovin 2017-09-06
im looking at this, and it seems the model is mostly (or completely) a correlation between solar activity intensity and earthquake intensity. the reason OP couldn't predict location is that the model does not consider location in it's correlations.
Also, I don't buy OP's hypothesis about the cause. sorry, OP. I am still very impressed by how you found a correlation and produced a predictive model where nobody else was looking.
this post, along with the the earthquake lights confirmations, are going to lead to some very interesting breakthroughs and hypothesis confirmations.
my thoughts are all about the magnetosphere (and by extension, the magnetic core of the planet) interacting with the magnetic solar activity and basically shuddering the core so that plate faults with more stress are likely to slip.
1 d121212 2017-09-06
It sounds like he doesn't have statistical training but he is reaching out to others with this background to collaborate with him and try to improve prediction.
1 Rose_Lite 2017-09-06
Holy Shit! You did it!
1 BrickNtheWall 2017-09-06
Congrats! I hope you work helps to better the planet.
1 Beltrev_Montor 2017-09-06
you absolute mad man you did it
1 presidentkangaroo 2017-09-06
It's called a coincidence, you rubes.
1 ScoobyD00BIEdoo 2017-09-06
Here I stood, on the day of shakey earth.
1 theHawkmooner 2017-09-06
You're a legend dude!
1 robledokari 2017-09-06
I'm from Mexico. Thank you for taking your time for your analysis.
1 Opan_IRL 2017-09-06
Legit bro how'd you know
1 18hockey 2017-09-06
Commenting to say I was here
1 SnowMexico 2017-09-06
I know you get shit on a lot but I fully support you man!
1 jamesmaddogmattis 2017-09-06
Dude how
Can someone please ELI5 what this guy is doing? It seems very impressive
1 Oliebears 2017-09-06
Duuude...so when's the BIG one gonna happen? Crazy man
1 mannyrmz123 2017-09-06
Holy shit. NASA should really get ahold of this guy and use his services to predict catastrophes worldwide.
1 Vilechill 2017-09-06
Hey u/ParsingSol I would love your insight on the "Earthquake Lights" Phenomena. With the potential to connect CMEs with Earthquakes would this also explain events like this? warning facebook video link
I 100% admit I don't fully understand the science in everything involved here but is it possible that as the CME connects with the earths Atmosphere (penetrating to a certain point?) it could cause these types of lights? We already know it'll impact the aurora borealis.
1 Gypsy_Cowboy 2017-09-06
Dayum sun
1 Circa_19Something 2017-09-06
what was up with the lights that were witnessed in the sky of Mexico before 8.4 magnitude earthquake hit?
https://mobile.twitter.com/kevinfigman/status/906048966755848192/video/1
1 damonpointagates 2017-09-06
Pezio-electric effect on a large scale.
1 Circa_19Something 2017-09-06
Piezo electricity i thought only occurs in crystal materials. School me please
1 cheese_a_user_name 2017-09-06
A sign that a earthquake might be coming by the rocks starting to get squeezed and making the pezio effect
1 Circa_19Something 2017-09-06
Thank you
1 RaiderRush2112 2017-09-06
Math is the language of everything. Great job predicting this really fascinating stuff
1 NSFWIssue 2017-09-06
If no one else is brave enough, I'll say it.
I'm too stupid to know what the fuck you're saying, care to speak in english for me? Are you somehow correlating solar flares with earthquakes? Why? How?
1 Todos1881 2017-09-06
Wow NSFWissue doesn't understand the correlation between solar flares and earthquakes what an idiot!!!
I'm kidding. I too would like an ELI5 version.
1 aliengiraffe 2017-09-06
Wow you were 100% right!
1 InsignificantThing 2017-09-06
Put my name in the textbooks please
1 dustedrob 2017-09-06
OMG you were right.
1 agent0fCha0s 2017-09-06
Insanely impressive. I'll be following your posts from here on out.
1 xerokaoz 2017-09-06
maybe was north korea with him nuclear test
1 Andantiakin 2017-09-06
There was a second (larger) solar flare today, so do you think a bigger earthquake is coming too ?
1 WhaleLord_OverLord 2017-09-06
I'm not a scientist but, The way I see it at the moment is the following; This isn't your first Earthquake prediction, it also isn't your first correct prediction, but your incorrect predictions are much more common than your correct predictions. Remember a broken clock is right twice a day. BUT I do believe you could be on to something, more eyes on this post may help to prove or disprove your theory.
1 dogrescuersometimes 2017-09-06
Why does a solar event cause an earthquake? (genuine question not being snide)
1 The_Rhythm_Ninja 2017-09-06
Nailed it. Nice work!
1 twisterjester 2017-09-06
Interesting prediction. I'd love to follow you, but as a newbie don't even have a clue how to follow. Will be watching to see the Cali break follow.
1 icefoxen 2017-09-06
All the data is publicly available, so I did some rather ghetto correlation analysis on historical earthquakes and solar wind info.
https://github.com/icefoxen/quakes/
tl;dr between 1986 and 2008 the correlation between intense geomagnetic fields and intense earthquakes was 0.116 at max. 1 would be "totally correlated with each other" and 0 would be "totally random", so the relationship between them is pretty darn close to totally random.
1 TheEarthquakeGuy 2017-09-06
Let's make something really clear. /u/ParsingSol did not call this.
While I am supportive of anyone trying to better understand seismic risks, patterns and such, I am more passionate about fighting misinformation. There is no such thing as earthquake prediction. No agency in the world has been able to do it, even with millions of dollars in backing money. Scientific research projects looking into these relationships have come up with nothing substantial.
He's made a number of false predictions for sometime. Eventually he was going to get it 'right'.
He predicted the wrong area, and gave a range of a large earthquake.
He hasn't used historic data to validate his theory.
Please understand this for what is it is;
A fluke
Misinformation like this post, dutchsinse etc claim to have abilities to predict these events, which people flock to because of how scary it can be. I understand that. I really do because I used to be like that before I realised how bullshit that was.
Unfortunately, it's fear mongering. It's causing constant concern and in the end, when nothing happens, it can create disbelief in the actual dangers of these events.
So again, he didn't call it, he got lucky.
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Tornado watches and warnings are more wrong then correct. How come we don't discredit those predictions....? Since they make ore false predictions then correct ones? I mean eventually they will get it right, based off of variables we have determined as "ripe" for a tornado to form, right?
Ok.... And....? Again it's a predictive model in it's infancy and we are calling BS cause he didn't pick the correct spot on the entire earth that the earthquake would hit?
What historical data do you refer to when it's a amateur scientific method in process?
/u/ParsingSol doesn't claim any ability, he states his reasons for why he thinks the earthquake may take place and that's it.
I'm not sure you know what sub you are in.
Calling out something for what it is and then providing source materials is a good way to back up what you are saying... But you haven't done that. You are simply a reddit username that gathered attention for reposting information from the internet. You don't actually provide any original content in any of your posts besides your personal opinion.
If you want to downplay something because you feel science has thoroughly studied, applied theories, that were then proven to be false and the scientific community agreed with said results, great! But I can't find any shred of that evidence currently. Otherwise you are no better than /u/ParsingSol and actually you are worse for downplaying something you can't reference to as proven debunked form of prediction model for earthquakes.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
What data are you using in saying that tornado warnings are more often incorrect that correct?
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Data from the government.
October 2007 – March 2011
Number of tornadoes: 158 Number of Tornado Warnings: 522 POD: 70.6% FAR: 83.0% LT (minutes) 14.75
May 2011 – May 2014
Number of tornadoes: 94 Number of Tornado Warnings: 132 POD: 70.6% FAR: 58.3% LT (minutes): 14.60
source: https://www.weather.gov/bmx/research_falsealarms
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
That was only related to the city of Birmingham, and with the data you listed only 30% of the warnings were false alarms. Is it fair to say that you see his model as being comparable in accuracy with the tornado warning false alarm percentage in Birmingham Alabama in 2011-2014?
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Can you please walk me through your math? between 2007 and 2014:
Total tornadoes: 252 Total number of Warnings: 654 That is a 62% false alarm rating..... I think you might have your math backwards....
Sorry I gave you sample data. Give me a couple minutes and I can get you the entire US accuracy rating.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
i did 94 / 132 = 71% successful, a 29% false alarm rate. What is the success rate of this guys earthquake predictions?
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
I also would have chosen the more favorable time boxed data set if I was trying to argue from your point of view.
http://journals.ametsoc.org/na101/home/literatum/publisher/ams/journals/content/wefo/2011/15200434-26.4/waf-d-10-05004.1/production/images/large/waf-d-10-05004.1-f2.jpeg
Source: http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/WAF-D-10-05004.1
Here is the national false alarm data set from 2000 - 2004, with a false alarm rate of around 60%.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
Gotcha, thanks for getting all that data!! So using the 40% tornado alarm succcess rate, how do his earthquake predictions for the past year or two stack up?
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
See this is what I love!!! And how I feel we should be looking at it! So as you saw with Birmingham sample data, 2007-2011 they issued a lot of warnings for what seems like a smaller amount of actual tornados! But we saw that from 2011 - 2014 their accuracy got better, probably due to better prediction models, historical data and more accurate tools to better predict the weather patterns that most likely produce tornados! Which is awesome. So in a matter of 4 years they took a system of prediction with an accuracy of around 30%(2007-2011) and increased it to about 70%(2011-2014)
/u/parsingsol had another username before this current one, I can't remember what it was. But I think with the combination of the two accounts and if my memory is some what accurate, he is probably sitting around 20-30 predictions and 1 accurate! Which looks rough and I will agree with anyone who says so. But I'm trying to keep in mind that this is a amateur trying to prove a theory with an amateur scientific method. So in terms of test data vs time its still a very immature test model. Which doesn't make his predictions accurate or right! Just makes it unclear until we can verify more test data over a longer period of time.
At least that is how I'm approaching it.
1 GrumpyAntelope 2017-09-06
Are they written down anywhere? I get that we can check this account but it's just a few months old and I know he's been doing this for six years.
Backing up, the tornado data was cool. Really appreciate the link to that!
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Sure thing! Weather is a very big side passion of mine so I love digging into anything related to it!
For uparsingsol previous account for historical data, unfortunately I think we are a screwed for tracking. I don't know exactly what happened and I respected his privacy during our PM's while discussing his reasoning for wiping the account clean. Once I realized he had started a using a new account. He mentioned their was personal risk involved if he kept using that account. (personal I think he might have been doxxed). If you read through his posts he isn't very good at articulating his sentences, he's just fucking amazing at crunching numbers. So I didn't want to press. But I can tell you that he hasn't been predicting for 5 years. His previous account was considerably old (maybe 3-4 years) but he didn't start publicly predicting till about a year +/- 6 months ago. I mentioned my 2-4 years in my previous comment since that is what he mentioned to me during our PM's. I'm hoping he has that data recorded. Cause it could end up being pretty invaluable.
Also if you are interested in this and want to follow / research a little more into it: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTiL1q9YbrVam5nP2xzFTWQ
Take a look at that channel. If you google the channel name the guy has a website and a decently active forum of people discussing this very idea around planets/moons/sun and any other celestial activity and it's potential influence on earthly events. Pretty interesting shit.
1 ToddWhiskey 2017-09-06
Right. His only argument when facing the elephant in the room seems to be: "Eventually he was going to get it 'right'."
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Sure thing! The exact same model we use for tornado warnings! I applaud your attention to detail!
1 peteroh9 2017-09-06
Well, there's this:
1 ToddWhiskey 2017-09-06
Gatekeeper of knowledge and its progression detected.
1 Dreamtrain 2017-09-06
Would like to see how many times he's called it vs misses.
1 Qwaszx93 2017-09-06
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes.
1 smokahontas619 2017-09-06
u/LoneNinjanick
1 vgodless 2017-09-06
Immediately remembered this post when I saw the news. You have more source information for your theory
1 benedictFocker 2017-09-06
What if OP was actually in Mexico and the earthquake got him? The ultimate way to go?
1 Nexgod2 2017-09-06
Incredible. This seems like something vastly important...
1 EvilPhd666 2017-09-06
Example of mass displacement by hurricanes.
1 dxplq876 2017-09-06
Why is this in r/conspiracy and not some science related sub?
1 JustMetod 2017-09-06
Looks like he was right.
1 Circa_19Something 2017-09-06
10:00pm pst here in tustin, ca and my my just calls me on her way home from work saying she just witnessed some red lights in the sky.. she compared it to the lights that flashed across Mexico right before the earthquake...
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Might be aurora borealis.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Might be aurora borealis.
1 Circa_19Something 2017-09-06
You think you'd be able to see something like that w/all the light pollution? Fortunately, last night we did not have an earthquake.
1 Etoiles_mortant 2017-09-06
He has never provided any data or formulas for his work, neither has he shown a list of predictions and success ratings.
Case in point, if he had a formula it would have either been extremely easy to explain why the "largest earthquake of 16-17" didn't happen. He would also have been able to explain what was changed this time, making his "largest earthquake of the decade" post valid.
His only real successes are earthquakes bellow 5.0 on highly energetic region. A user replied to one of his posts with random predictions and got an equivalent ratio of correct outcomes.
On the other side, op has tried to crowdfund his work but then it emerged that he wanted the money to get married which prompted him to create another account.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I bet my ass on it.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I have 0 stanley nickles.
1 Schotel 2017-09-06
Quote a couple of his correct predictions.
Explain his hypothesis and methology.
Have you not noticed that he has actually never explain what his hypothesis is and how he comes to his conclusions?
1 TheEarthquakeGuy 2017-09-06
I was called to the last post by ParsingSol, and while his theory is detailed, it didn't come through. We'll see about this one, but frankly, I disagree.
1 Nanderson423 2017-09-06
...That doesn't even make sense.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Its in the comments.
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
I have a thread on flux tubes vs magnetosphere. /r/parsingsol
1 ParsingSol 2017-09-06
Ive guessed right enough to be approached by some very impressive users. (will update when I know more).
Balls in their court. ;)
1 ILOVEYABADMOMO 2017-09-06
<333 good luck man
1 Waiting4TheCollapse 2017-09-06
8.1 in Mexico City....
1 _FAPPLE_JACKS_ 2017-09-06
Luckily you didn't bet. Massive earthquake in Mexico
1 So_Very_Awake 2017-09-06
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us2000ahlq#executive
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He did. Japan or Nepal. Where coincidentally, this earthquake was nowhere near.
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 LE_UNITED_SUCKS 2017-09-06
He said it would be in Japan or Nepal
1 PM-ME-YOUR-CONCERN 2017-09-06
Who cares. Timing an 8.0 earthquake to the very week it would happen must be 1 in 10,000 odds
1 lolmonsterlol 2017-09-06
He does it by probability. He doesn't have this part down yet. But he freaking did it!
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Sure thing! You win!
1 JTM1218 2017-09-06
Literally doesn't come across that way.
1 exomniac 2017-09-06
He also said "If I had to guess..."
1 exomniac 2017-09-06
What should we call this method?
1 lapride7 2017-09-06
Lol bro stop, whatever you're doing is not going to work. What's your excuse this time?
1 oxide-NL 2017-09-06
How often does one occur of the 8.0 magnitude?
He didn't say "A earth quick" but rather specific between 8.0 ~9.5
Thats pretty darn accurate
1 TheFox51 2017-09-06
Los Angeles checking in, can confirm .. we aren't interested in any earthquakes. thank you.
1 Beltrev_Montor 2017-09-06
he likely works at HAARP they caused this not the sun
1 kingcubfan 2017-09-06
6.0 in Cali is like nothing tho, its when we get into the 7's when the damage starts.
1 op-return 2017-09-06
Just admit you were wrong.
1 vingt_et_un 2017-09-06
except he said east coast of japan...
1 Mendican 2017-09-06
Sure, but last night was one of the largest in history. Shit happens every day, right?
1 bert0ld0 2017-09-06
It actually happened in Japan not long ago! Almost 6.0!
1 Scroon 2017-09-06
Oh, I see the comment post now. Thanks for explaining.
But look at the context, he's not saying "It's going to be here!". Rather:
Basically, he's saying to just consider those locations...and turns out Mexico City is actually a hit.
By itself, the location data could be seen as a broad guess, but you have to factor in that he also called the magnitude and timing pretty darned well.
1 drk_etta 2017-09-06
Data from the government.
October 2007 – March 2011
Number of tornadoes: 158 Number of Tornado Warnings: 522 POD: 70.6% FAR: 83.0% LT (minutes) 14.75
May 2011 – May 2014
Number of tornadoes: 94 Number of Tornado Warnings: 132 POD: 70.6% FAR: 58.3% LT (minutes): 14.60
source: https://www.weather.gov/bmx/research_falsealarms