(/r/conspiracy Throwback Repost) 9/11: Engine that shot out of the south tower was NOT from a UA 767!

112  2017-09-13 by wile_e_chicken

United Airlines Flight 175 struck the South Tower. Its tail number was N162UA. It was a Boeing 767-222.

http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20010911-1

Flight 175 had two Pratt and Whitney JT9D-7R4D engines.

http://206.18.175.32/Media/boeing767industrydat-1005-1010.pdf

American Airlines Flight 11 struck the North Tower. Its tail number was N334AA. It was a Boeing 767-222ER. Flight 11 had two General Electric CF6-80A2 engines.

http://206.18.175.32/Media/boeing767industrydat-1005-1010.pdf

Take note of the engine type this cooling duct assembly is used on. It is used on the JT9D-7 series.

http://ckpi.typepad.com/.a/6a00e00982d2c988330120a5bf58d4970c-500wi

This is the cooling duct assembly used on the JT9D-7R4D, which was the engine used for Flight 175:

http://ckpi.typepad.com/.a/6a00e00982d2c988330120a5bf649d970c-500wi

Murray Street Engine:

http://ckpi.typepad.com/.a/6a00e00982d2c988330120a5bf53f4970c-500wi

http://ckpi.typepad.com/.a/6a00e00982d2c988330120a758572b970b-500wi

http://ckpi.typepad.com/.a/6a00e00982d2c988330120a5bf5446970c-500wi

The name of the component is HPT Stage1 Cooling Duct Assembly. There is a history behind this assembly as I began to read more. This component was part of the early JT9D-7 series engines that were used in development of Boeing's 747 line of aircraft. The "7" series engines have gone through many revisions but are exclusively used on 747's. Many years later, P&W decided to work with NASA in the development in a new technology to improve engine performance and reliability. This improvement was made specifically to this section of engine. Tangential On-Board Injection (TOBI or "R" for Radial) was the newest improvement to reduce nozzle temperatures by over 2% which could open the door for a more powerful engines based on the "7" series engine. The new model of engine would be called 7R4+Revision Letter. The 7R4D engine is the one that is specified for United Airlines Boeing 767's.

The engine found at Church and Murray didn't seem to be a 7R4D.....it seemed to be a 7J. The only way to confirm this is to search for the engine and take a look at the diffuser casing to verify a match. This was another needle in a haystack but I found it......a photo of a stripped down 747 engine at an outdoor museum. The diffuser casing is a perfect match!

http://ckpi.typepad.com/.a/6a00e00982d2c988330120a568bf6c970b-500wi

Take note of the arrows to see that they match the JT9D-7 series engine on the 747 shown in the photo. Click to enlarge.

http://ckpi.typepad.com/.a/6a00e00982d2c988330120a5bf5ddd970c-500wi

"We have two data points indicating that the Murray Street engine is a Pratt and Whitney JT9D-7 series engine: the HPT Stage 1 Cooling Duct Assembly which the manufacturer indicates is for use only with the 7 series engine, and we have the diffuser casing of the Murray Street engine matching perfectly the diffuser casing of a 747 engine --for which model of Boeing aircraft Weezula says the JT9D-7 series engine was exclusively used." All data so far seem to indicate that the Murray Street engine is not a JT9D-7R4D engine, as would have been on Flight 175. (And the Murray Street engine certainly is not a GE CF6 engine from Flight 11.)

"So how did a 7-series 747 engine wind up on Murray Street?"

CREDIT TO Christopher King

Original 2015 /r/conspiracy post:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/34o4y0/911_engine_that_shot_out_of_the_south_tower_was/

Credit: /u/birthdaysuit11

19 comments

1  perfect_pickles 2017-09-13

don't forget that piece of airliner flap mechanism found between two buildings near the WTC site a couple of years ago.

it could not be used 15 year ago as the rope attached to it to lower it between the buildings did not release. so it sat there unloved until recently, then announced then quickly forgotten as people commented on the rope.

1  wile_e_chicken 2017-09-13

Ha! Got a link?

1  qualityproduct 2017-09-13

This is the story in question.

1  wile_e_chicken 2017-09-13

"The piece was found with ropes that aren't believed be part of the plane. "

Ouch!

Thanks for the link; I hadn't seen that.

1  Moonwalkingturtle 2017-09-13

Ahh yes. No one would have noticed people coming in with a destroyed engine and placing it on the street. And the people who placed it there would have zero questions as to why they were ordered to drop an engine on the street. More importantly, do you even have the original source for this picture? I have googled a bunch of terms and can't seem to find that it's real.

1  mkdhotrod 2017-09-13

Im a truther, and this is the real question. Who went around throwing engine parts around ground zero?

1  sons_of_many_bitches 2017-09-13

I assumed the conspiracy he's getting at was the planes that hit weren't the commercial airliners but something else?

1  mkdhotrod 2017-09-13

Tracking. I see it now.

1  Moonwalkingturtle 2017-09-13

The conspiracy I'm getting at is that 9/11 wasn't a conspiracy.

1  GoldenTruth 2017-09-13

LOL

1  TheBapster 2017-09-13

Someone that was told to? Crazier stuff has been done that's for sure.... It was chaos in the financial district, no matter me would have questioned an official looking pickup truck/trailer hauling ass to the scene and 'finding' some of the wreckage.

1  SixVISix 2017-09-13

The article repeatedly cites the source.

1  Moonwalkingturtle 2017-09-13

Which article? There's a bunch of links in this post.

1  mcmlover 2017-09-13

IF it is a different engine this could align with the Operation Northwoods memo: land plane safely and switch with same tail numbered plane/drone and attribute this to a hostile force. It was unclassified in CIA docs hard to believe they never went back to the drawing board to use that idea again, successfully.

1  orionquest2016 2017-09-13

This and the passport are two facts I haven't seen argued well by the official narrative.

Here's a string about the engine on Metabunk. I can't tell what's concluded; still seems open.

1  CrazySpazyCakes 2017-09-13

My take from that is that he concludes that both of the rings are used in the JT9D-7R4D. The post from Metabunk also shows this and this photo.

I always believed the engine found on Murray Street did not align with the facts about the enigine used in the plane. I have to concede however that these photos, by a everyday mechanic, indicate that the Murray Street engine is indeed the JT9D-7R4D.

1  Thalbram 2017-09-13

Super believable guys, great job!

1  MilkyWitness 2017-09-13

For real though, they are pretty fucking terrible at doing a good false flag job. They can half-ass the job like 9/11 and lie through the MSM and call it good.

1  mkdhotrod 2017-09-13

I still want to see footage of the plane hitting the Pentagon and not the 4 frames they released.

1  wile_e_chicken 2017-09-13

"The piece was found with ropes that aren't believed be part of the plane. "

Ouch!

Thanks for the link; I hadn't seen that.