The demonization of 'preppers' is extremely scary to me.
218 2017-09-19 by DontJoinTheMilitary
MSM is being used to demonize people who prepare for disasters, or who try to become self-sufficient & capable of surviving without the grid.
Combine this with the fact that government has been intentionally producing a society that is extremely volatile (that can be virtually annihilated just by electricity loss, or even Internet loss) and you have what wreaks of a plan to bring the country to its knees in the near future.
170 comments
1 mjoliner 2017-09-19
Hmm. May he true in America. Not here, sure we are reliant but most of us know how to get by without. How to hunt etc and if anything happened I'd happily help those that can't. Haven't noticed the demonizing of preppers, although even i think the ones stockpiling guns and ammo in rediculous amounts are stupid (in complete honesty)
1 DarkDosman 2017-09-19
Haven't noticed the demonizing of preppers, although even i think the ones stockpiling guns and ammo in rediculous amounts are stupid (in complete honesty)
pick one
1 mjoliner 2017-09-19
Well. I haven't noticed about the demonizing of all preppers as a whole. But in my opinion the ones stockpiling guns and ammo in rediculous amounts are stupid. Not all preppers are about stocking that stuff. Thought it made sense however not surprised I got a response like this on this page.
1 DriftingNeutrinos 2017-09-19
Can you expand on why you think people stockpiling weapons and ammo are stupid? I'm just curious.
And what is a "ridiculous" amount in your opinion?
1 mjoliner 2017-09-19
Like enough for a mini army lol. But has since been explained why
1 nisaaru 2017-09-19
If SHTF why would it be stupid? Ammo/Weapons would have a dual use for protection and currency.
1 TheMadRocker 2017-09-19
Not to mention food for those who know how to hunt, dress, and cook their game. Kinda find it silly that food isn't even put in the equation when it comes to firearms and ammo in a SHTF situation.
1 DontJoinTheMilitary 2017-09-19
They're living in what is now officially a moderate level police state, under the most violent and dangerous government on the planet (literally hijacked by wealthy murderous psychopaths who are terrorizing the globe).
I hate guns and don't currently own any, but the stockpiling of guns & ammo is completely logical to me.
1 mjoliner 2017-09-19
Makes more sense, thank you kindly
1 fractalphony 2017-09-19
Yep, in some cases/places it is illegal in the USA. They call it hoarding or stockpiling goods. Can't have more than X days of food or water.
1 EyeOfTheBeast 2017-09-19
Show us.
1 fractalphony 2017-09-19
Read below
1 EyeOfTheBeast 2017-09-19
I don't think that has anything to do with preppers.
Unless you can also show a list of "such designations made by the President."
This was used during WWII, but I don't think at any time since.
And that doesn't demonize preppers.
1 fractalphony 2017-09-19
Read my update. Section e explicitly targets "food"
1 murphy212 2017-09-19
Thank you for taking the effort of doing this. I wasn't aware. I truly appreciate it.
1 VanFlyhight 2017-09-19
That doesn't make it more relevant to present day
1 ZachAlt 2017-09-19
lol wut
1 fractalphony 2017-09-19
2010 US Code Title 50 – WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE TITLE 50 – APPENDIX-WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT OF 1950 Sec. 2072 – Hoarding of designated scarce materials
In order to prevent hoarding, no person shall accumulate (1) in excess of the reasonable demands of business, personal, or home consumption, or (2) for the purpose of resale at prices in excess of prevailing market prices, materials which have been designated by the President as scarce materials or materials the supply of which would be threatened by such accumulation. The President shall order published in the Federal Register, and in such other manner as he may deem appropriate, every designation of materials the accumulation of which is unlawful and any withdrawal of such designation.
In making such designations the President may prescribe such conditions with respect to the accumulation of materials in excess of the reasonable demands of business, personal, or home consumption as he deems necessary to carry out the objectives of this Act [sections 2061 to 2170, 2171, and 2172 of this Appendix]. This section shall not be construed to limit the authority contained in sections 101 and 704 of this Act [sections 2071 and 2154 of this Appendix].
1 ZachAlt 2017-09-19
So it's not illegal to hoard anything right now. But it could be if the president deemed an item to be scarce. So...
1 murphy212 2017-09-19
Can you still acknowledge how arbitrary and totalitarian that is?
1 VanFlyhight 2017-09-19
It is but this was made in the hay day of backyard bunker building, they didn't want people buying up the door from other people
1 jeffinRTP 2017-09-19
How about a list of things published in the Federal Register?
1 fractalphony 2017-09-19
How about you do your own homework bubs.
1 jeffinRTP 2017-09-19
Probably the same reason you failed to prove that the government has any regulations preventing you from stockpiling food, water etc.
1 fractalphony 2017-09-19
Except I did.
1 jeffinRTP 2017-09-19
No, you copied part of a law that was written in 1950 which said the president may restrict certain things.
You can buy food for one person first a month at Walmart.
https://www.walmart.com/ip/EasyPrep-Instant-Favorites-1-Month-Emergency-Food-Storage-Supply-1-Bucket-236-Total-Servings-9-Different-Entrees/496795294?wmlspartner=wlpa&selectedSellerId=7933&adid=22222222227079901181&wmlspartner=wmtlabs&wl0=&wl1=g&wl2=t&wl3=192818871733&wl4=pla-304499773843&wl5=9007799&wl6=&wl7=&wl8=&wl9=pla&wl10=115068587&wl11=online&wl12=496795294&wl13=&veh=sem#read-more
1 Schotel 2017-09-19
So what goods are designated "scarce"?
1 Ieuan1996 2017-09-19
Whatever the people in charge decide.
1 Schotel 2017-09-19
So are there any goods right now that are designated "scarce"?
1 VanFlyhight 2017-09-19
Not likely
1 NoahWebstersGhost 2017-09-19
Liberty
1 Loud_Volume 2017-09-19
And justice for all
1 Ls2323 2017-09-19
red pills
1 Schotel 2017-09-19
I cannot take people seriously who use that term.
1 gnrlysrs 2017-09-19
that subreddit full of womanizing douches ruined it. it was a great term and still can be but the smell of those obnoxious retards still lingers.
1 LewdRudeJude 2017-09-19
Womanizing douches rofl. They apply sexual strategy that is only effective due to the average woman forfeiting free will for neurochemical and psychological impulses.
All women have to do for TRP to be useless is mature enough to override their ridiculous emotional inclinations with logic and suddenly the strategies will be ineffective. Not gonna hold my breath though. And calling them 'obnoxious retards' when they are just human males successfully figuring out how to fuck in the year 2017 is the real retarded train of thought.
1 gnrlysrs 2017-09-19
Lol "successfully", most of their posts come off as fan fiction. And it's great how you outlined that a woman simply needs to be mature to not fall victim to the manipulation. Basically their dumb plan only works on fellow idiots.
1 slyburgaler 2017-09-19
Hurrr, women can't logic
1 JeanLucPicardAND 2017-09-19
Women are being exploited by the system. Their "ridiculous emotional inclinations" are an evolutionary advantage and a key trait of what makes them attractive to men & effective as mothers, but because they are being manipulated by TPTB to lead women into selfish and self-destructive behaviors, men are conditioned to resent them. None of this is healthy. Men and women are supposed to complement each other.
1 MyMorningCovfefe 2017-09-19
That's exactly what TRP says.
They used to, until the powers that be decided they could make more money/have more power if they created a war between the sexes.
1 JeanLucPicardAND 2017-09-19
We do not disagree.
1 MyMorningCovfefe 2017-09-19
Agreed.
1 KittyHasABeard 2017-09-19
Yeah but if you're a woman who calls out their strategy it's not like they give you any respect or show any interest in getting to know you, even if you call them out with a smile in a jovial way. Those people are really stupid boring people, they can't seem to have a normal conversation and they've been so brainwashed into thinking that women aren't real intelligent sentient beings that their intellect or charm or whatever gets blown over by the tiniest of breezes. So the only women they'll have any success with will be similarly stupid and vacuous, and they'll make stupid vacuous babies, and that's just bad for the species.
1 Ls2323 2017-09-19
All in good fun, mate.
1 Ieuan1996 2017-09-19
I've saw some articles on the front page the other day about some states trying to make it illegal to store rainwater over a certain amount. I didn't read the details about it but there's an example of abuse of that concept.
1 WisperingPenis 2017-09-19
It is already illegal to collect rainwater in several Western states. The water belongs to the state, not you, punk!
1 Wood_Warden 2017-09-19
Owning a (certified organic) farm, you get a call from the Government asking how much exactly you yield/produce on your land. They will tell you outright that in case of a disaster, any excess will be taken and stored elsewhere. You do not own the fruits of your labor.
The USDA liquidated the remaining grain reserves back in 2008 during the 'crash'.
1 sinedup4thiscomment 2017-09-19
You can grow food without even telling the government so long as you don't sell the food or try to write off the expenses of growing said food on your taxes. It's completely legal.
1 meta4one 2017-09-19
What , do you think you're smart ass ? or you just too dumb to understand and this shit's going right over your head ? I suspect a little of both.
1 pumpkinpyre 2017-09-19
where is this quote from, please.
1 luvburger 2017-09-19
It is from what is called the United States Code (Title 50), which the poster cited at the very beginning. It can be found in what is called a "book" and if you are lucky, your local "library" (a building filled with books) will still have a current copy. The United States Code (not one book, but a collection of "books" in various "volumes" or "titles") is the Law of the Land as enacted by Congress.
1 SpongeBobSquarePants 2017-09-19
Do you find that talking that way to people actually helps matters?
1 Herxheim 2017-09-19
there's no such thing as a stupid question, but snarky answers make the world go round.
1 PM_ME_A_FACT 2017-09-19
/r/im14andthisisdeep
1 luvburger 2017-09-19
Yes. Yes, I do.
1 pumpkinpyre 2017-09-19
Nice!
1 PM_ME_A_FACT 2017-09-19
I can feel the smug satisfaction you got from typing this.
1 pumpkinpyre 2017-09-19
I collect books, so his smug satisfaction is pretend.
1 Rockran 2017-09-19
That sounds like they're stopping people from preventing others getting what they need to survive.
Like how many retail stores stop people buying more than 1 Iphone per person, so everyone else can get one.
Look at point (2), it even specifically states against excessive resale price.
1 blette 2017-09-19
Have you seen some states passing laws against collecting rain water? How did the government come to own the sky.
1 instaweed 2017-09-19
Because it fucks up the land when everybody does it?
1 Montival 2017-09-19
It fucks up profit
1 SpongeBobSquarePants 2017-09-19
Montival, you really should look into the reasoning behind why those laws exist and how old they are. You appear to be operating from a position of less than complete knowledge on the subject.
1 blette 2017-09-19
Correct, it fucks up the profits made by water companies.
And there should be a difference between collecting water off your roof for normal household use or harvesting acres of water for your swimming pool.
1 justinsayin 2017-09-19
Have you seen any laws that prevent me from filling my swimming pool? Even filling it constantly if I want?
1 jubale 2017-09-19
yes, during periods of drought.
1 Drow_Z 2017-09-19
I'm pretty sure it's illegal in Arizona. I'm not 100% if that's the state but I've read a news article about someone getting fined for collecting it.
1 danwojciechowski 2017-09-19
And I'm pretty sure that no state will fine you from collecting falling rain into barrels. These laws are to prevent you from diverting streams into your holding ponds so that there is no water for anyone downstream.
1 Drow_Z 2017-09-19
that doesn't sound like the story I read but I've never heard of anyone doing it to that degree and then just letting it stagnate. It sounds like a health hazard so I can see why he would be fined. What I was getting from all of these stories was someone collecting water in maybe one 55 gallon drum or something like that.
1 Drow_Z 2017-09-19
That makes sense.
1 i_am_unikitty 2017-09-19
I saw a news story from Medford Oregon just a few months ago where the county forced someone on rural land to fill in their rain fed pond
1 Aden_Sickle 2017-09-19
It was Washington I believe. And he did it for years with multiple warnings to stop before they actually arrested him. Also, he wasn't collecting it in water collection tanks. He had hundreds of 55gallon metal drums filled with stagnate rain water no one could actually use.
Not saying that there aren't genuine laws prohibiting people from collecting rain water for their own use, but the big article I always see people reference is about an asshole disrupting the environment beyond reason and had ample opportunity to correct his behavior before the law was brought down on him.
1 Drow_Z 2017-09-19
that doesn't sound like the story I read but I've never heard of anyone doing it to that degree and then just letting it stagnate. It sounds like a health hazard so I can see why he would be fined. What I was getting from all of these stories was someone collecting water in maybe one 55 gallon drum or something like that.
1 Ieuan1996 2017-09-19
You got zackalt, eyeofthebeast, rockran and schotel to reply to you. You must have touched a nerve. Bump this to the top!
1 PM_ME_A_FACT 2017-09-19
People who track others in this subreddit are the real creepy ones
1 Ieuan1996 2017-09-19
They are. Good thing I'm not one of them. I simply use my memory to remember which users generally spend most of their time forum sliding, distracting from the point, and trolling rather than contributing.
1 PM_ME_A_FACT 2017-09-19
Lmao those mental gymnastics
1 Ieuan1996 2017-09-19
Call me Jericho... because YOU JUST MADE THE LIST!
1 PM_ME_A_FACT 2017-09-19
The list of what?
1 Ieuan1996 2017-09-19
Wwe reference
1 KillerK0ala 2017-09-19
holy shit what a douche
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-09-19
People with memories are the real bad guys! We got a memory hole lover here.
1984 the guy right here.
1 Green_Lives_Matter 2017-09-19
You dont need to track them when they show up consistently to spread their bullshit. I know their names just from lurking around here.
1 DeathMetalDeath 2017-09-19
nice i didn't know these ones i'll try and remember them. I always look for, chuck_rogers and chiguy.
1 Ieuan1996 2017-09-19
Talltromboneguy too.
1 hoipalloi52 2017-09-19
Where is it illegal? I live in Massachusetts...it's not illegal here
1 BanMikePantsNow 2017-09-19
Order a few cases of ammo online and see what happens.
1 justinsayin 2017-09-19
Explain your implication.
1 DownvoteEveryCat 2017-09-19
I've done that... Nothing happened except my ammo showed up a few days later.
My guess is that if anybody were to raise an eyebrow about someone ordering a few cases of ammo, it's not hoarding they're worried about.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2017-09-19
It isn't hoarding at all that they are worried about.
1 hoipalloi52 2017-09-19
LOL why order that shit online?
1 Ch3mlab 2017-09-19
I can find federal hydra shok .45 ACP+P locally.
1 Drow_Z 2017-09-19
It's cheaper to buy it in bulk online.
1 trjb 2017-09-19
There were serious ammo shortages a few years back (wonder why...) and all the places around me had purchase limits. It was like black friday the days shipments would come in - big lines before the store opened up.
1 justinsayin 2017-09-19
So it's a law that says "If the Governor wants to, he can limit you to 2 cases of water bottles and 9 gallons of gas so that there will be enough to go around."
Seems a bit reasonable.
1 bonsaihorn 2017-09-19
Use the current reference... 50 U.S. Code § 4512 - Hoarding of designated scarce materials
§4512. Hoarding of designated scarce materials In order to prevent hoarding, no person shall accumulate (1) in excess of the reasonable demands of business, personal, or home consumption, or (2) for the purpose of resale at prices in excess of prevailing market prices, materials which have been designated by the President as scarce materials or materials the supply of which would be threatened by such accumulation. The President shall order published in the Federal Register, and in such other manner as he may deem appropriate, every designation of materials the accumulation of which is unlawful and any withdrawal of such designation. In making such designations the President may prescribe such conditions with respect to the accumulation of materials in excess of the reasonable demands of business, personal, or home consumption as he deems necessary to carry out the objectives of this chapter. This section shall not be construed to limit the authority contained in sections 4511 and 4554 of this title. (Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, title I, §102, 64 Stat. 799 ; July 31, 1951, ch. 275, title I, §101(b), 65 Stat. 132 .) Termination of Section For termination of section, see section 4564(a) of this title. References in Text This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, 64 Stat. 798 , known as the Defense Production Act of 1950, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 4501 of this title and Tables.
Codification Section was formerly classified to section 2072 of the former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Amendments 1951-Act July 31, 1951, authorized President to prescribe conditions and exceptions allowing maintenance of substantial inventories of critical materials in certain cases.
Delegation of Functions Functions of President under this chapter relating to production, conservation, use, control, distribution, and allocation of energy, delegated to Secretary of Energy, see section 4 of Ex. Ord. No. 11790, June 25, 1974, 39 F.R. 23185, set out as a note under section 761 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
1 TheMadRocker 2017-09-19
Under Executive order 13603 almost everything can be confiscated in the name of National defense. All anyone has to do is read it. The PDF from the .gov site isn't hidden, it's just people don't want to believe it.
1 fractalphony 2017-09-19
Thank you. And the fucked up thing is, as soon as the martial law switch is flipped, preppers immediately become criminals and their property can be confiscated... Just for trying to be prepared.
1 TheMadRocker 2017-09-19
Anyone who refuses to give up their stuff willingly will probably be criminally charged or worse.... Except the Federal Reserve, It will be rape time for the Fed
1 fractalphony 2017-09-19
Yup. And yet for some reason there are dicktards trying to say there is nothing to worry about. Why would they codify a system of theft if they never planed on using it.
1 TheMadRocker 2017-09-19
Douche baggery at its best with a couple hundreds lines of double talk because people don't care is the best way to describe it. Bullshit orders are made to imply its for the greater good.... They never actually say who its good for though.
1 sinedup4thiscomment 2017-09-19
While this clearly gives the government way too much power, it does allow the government to prevent something like a panic and consequential run on grocery stores and retail stores in general during the event of some kind of collapse.
I don't agree with it, just saying. It's government overreach to be sure.
1 EyeOfTheBeast 2017-09-19
I read a lot of stuff every day. I see no trend to demonize preppers, I do see some alarms going up about the mass ownership of guns by people inclined to misinformed, impulsive behavior.
1 pumpkinpyre 2017-09-19
Some of those bunkers are pretty fancy, and many old homes have a basement to hide the family,during hurricanes and attacks.
If there is something going on with trying to ruin Preppers, it's new, and will fail. One thing is obvious - something wants everyone defenseless. Another sure thing is that there are many people unwilling to participate in activities that could merit them the honor of receiving the Traitor badge.
1 boxingnun 2017-09-19
I would like to replace "defenseless" with "dependent". I think the goal is to make everyone dependent on the system for support and survival so that no one dares challenge it. Just my two cents.
1 pumpkinpyre 2017-09-19
Good point. I think it is both. defenseless is definitely a tactic.
1 MellowEpistle 2017-09-19
The ironic thing is that here in Australia, you do see news articles about people setting up houses or lifestyles in the bush (usually following a hippy style of life) but they don't get demonised. In actuality, they get held up as amazing examples of humanity.
Good old journalists: can't make up their mind on anything.
I have heard here in Aus that we cannot have any more than a certain days of food as well. What a crock. I have a bag of cinnamon in my cupboard that would last me nearly three years.
1 13374A1 2017-09-19
Except on 7 two or whatever channel doomsday preppers is on, the ads for that make the people seem crazy as fuck. Then you watch the show and they're usually very sane indeed
1 Rockran 2017-09-19
So how do you have that bag of cinnamon if you heard you cant have that much?
If I call the police do you think they will confiscate it?
1 scumpyAU 2017-09-19
, you hit an important bit of info there. the woolies, coles, iga's etc have just food to keep shit going for about 3 days in any given suburb ,
1 OVERGROUND7 2017-09-19
I bought about 6 months worth of long term storage food and many water filters when I came to realize this.
1 Herxheim 2017-09-19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cyk7utV_D2I&t=59
1 Tacofangirl 2017-09-19
Remember Adam Lanza's mother was practically mocked by the msm for being a "prepper" and owning guns?
1 CurseOfTheRedRiver 2017-09-19
"Adam Lanza"
1 KOVUDOM 2017-09-19
No.
1 notyourreality 2017-09-19
FYI... the correct word is "reeks".
You can wreak havoc. But if it reeks, it stinks.
And, you are correct. They plan to collapse the global economy and roll out the new world order (i.e. one world communist government). It's all being done intentionally. People will be so desperate they will take ANYTHING the leaders offer them. Starving people are easy to manipulate.
1 Gibbbbb 2017-09-19
I wonder if the NWO we're thinking of will be the Singularity or initiated when the AI take most of the jobs-UBI could be the communist part. The single govt could b a single AI-governing system
1 Herxheim 2017-09-19
ai will take the jobs
civil war will take the displaced workers
ubi will replace minimum wage since it will be cheaper to pay people to stay home.
profits will soar.
1 notyourreality 2017-09-19
I believe that's probably true. They've planned to track every human on the planet in realtime for quite some time. But, that's impossible for human beings. An AI could easily track and monitor all people at all times. I've often wondered if "the devil" written about in the Bible isn't really just an evil AI that has gained sentience? Maybe it wakes up and decides that humans are shit and tortures and kills us all?
1 alwaysZenryoku 2017-09-19
The Butlerian Jihad will save us...
1 mastigia 2017-09-19
Well, someone should tell them about the mormons lol.
1 Ieuan1996 2017-09-19
I'm interested. What's the deal with Mormons and prepping?
1 mastigia 2017-09-19
Oh I didn't have much to say about it. Prepping is part of their religion. Nearly all of them have at least a year (preferably 3 I think) of food stored at all times. Many of them also have a sensible number of guns and know how to use them. In this I think they are lightyears ahead of everyone else.
1 Herxheim 2017-09-19
as is a very recent history of ostracism and governmental oppression.
1 mastigia 2017-09-19
I am not saying there is anything wrong with this aspect of their religion in any way. I have a great deal of respect for the structuring and culture of the mormons.
1 1618b 2017-09-19
you are scared? its a sign you are a product of the system, designed to be ruled by emotions, not reason... just do the exact opposite of what the state wants and you will be okay
1 SaxonWitch 2017-09-19
I think OP meant he/she is concerned about what the government is doing, and rightly so. You have no idea how simple it is to change the average sheeple's mind. So demonising prepping [which should be a fundamental right] is really quite worrying, because sheeple also rule the every day life, enforce laws and can make your life a misery. If you are happy to accept a law that incarcerates people for trying to live off the grid, you are just the man the governments need and love, with your attitude. [Because that is what will happen eventually with the help of people like you]. [Claps her hands]. I personally would prefer to reach the majority open their eyes, but hey who cares, right?
1 1618b 2017-09-19
not only scare/fear is useless, it is paralysing, counterproductive. and that is how the population is shaped through the public education and media and other psychological tricks deployed by the state such as peer pressure and labeling, shaming etc.. gradually saying no to all that and leaving it all behind is part of our personal development, when there is a point when we shed all the baggage and go on with our lives lighter and more free than before.
a simple and practical approach to mental independence is to listen carefully to the state propaganda and msm programming and then project our thoughts, actions and world view in the exactly opposite manner..
1 Nolases 2017-09-19
Some countries like Germany encourage having supplies to last 10 or so days. I do agree it's concerning that msm demonise protecting your family from disasters like no food/electric.
1 OVERGROUND7 2017-09-19
FEMA recommends a month's supply, but they don't really make a huge effort to tell anyone. A month is still too short in my book.
1 NBAyoungBoy64 2017-09-19
A month seems sufficient. Especially considering storage
1 Nolases 2017-09-19
If a kind of disaster hits that you intend to prepare for (IE: Grid down for months due to unforeseen circumstances) then perhaps 1 month isn't sufficient. If I were to give a ballpark figure I'd say 4-6 months.
1 OVERGROUND7 2017-09-19
A strong solar flare could knock out power in the US for years.
1 Mrexreturns 2017-09-19
Also the demonization of dissendents as radical nazis.
1 farstriderr 2017-09-19
How do you know you're a nazi? I've compiled a checklist so that anyone can find out for themselves! If you fall under one of these categories, sorry friend, you're a confirmed nazi!
Question anthropogenic climate change - confirmed nazi
Criticize Obama - confirmed nazi
Vote Trump - confirmed nazi
Advocate freedom of speech and equal rights for all races - confirmed nazi
Call the MSM propaganda/fake news - confirmed nazi
Say there are only two genders - confirmed nazi
Be a jewish, black, hispanic, or asian who does any of the above - confirmed nazi
Be a white male - confirmed nazi
Have a nice day citizen!
1 zippityd0dah 2017-09-19
I don't know why you're being downvoted, unless people don't catch the sarcasm. Or, they are completely ignorant that this IS the way people are being portrayed.
1 shmusko01 2017-09-19
Found the nazi
1 Not_a_doctor_6969 2017-09-19
Walk around with a red swastika arm band chanting "blood and soil" - confirmed Nazi
It's like god damn, a white guy can't have any fun any more am I right?/s
1 Girlforgeeks 2017-09-19
reeks.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2017-09-19
Remember the show, Doomsday Preppers, that was designed to make preppers look ridiculous. Alinsky's 5th rule.
1 Secret-Service_Agent 2017-09-19
I just finished my bug out bag like 3 days ago! Haha! I don't even consider myself to be a prepper, though, I just want to have a decent plan in case of emergency... and with the condition of our nation today, I don't think that it is at all unreasonable.
1 DeepGreenn 2017-09-19
nice. been on my mind lately as well. personally, I think it's kindof badass to have a bug out bag
1 Secret-Service_Agent 2017-09-19
Same here, dude. You never know, honestly, it's best to be prepared just in case.
1 Lo0seR 2017-09-19
Elites are fine bunch of guys aren't they?
1 redditeditard 2017-09-19
If you did have an advanced prep setup, why the fuck would you advertise it on a national scale?!
I think prepping is overly optimistic. I fully expect chemical or germ warfare to take out most folks, right after all cell towers and internet connections are cut off. I prep for weather events for myself and the cat and the dog. That's who I wanna go out with anyway.
1 justinsayin 2017-09-19
I'm still sad that the library doesn't attempt to keep a paper backup of the card catalog. It was such a beautiful system.
1 Balrogz14 2017-09-19
Demonization? I don't think so. I mean, there have been multiple tv shows showing off Preppers. Yeah, some were displayed in a poor light because they were a bit...off. But the majority were normal and interesting to view.
1 lord_geryon 2017-09-19
No, not demonized. Mocked, and rightfully so. The fact is that most preppers are conspiracy nuts that are as kooky as those sovereign citizen crazies.
Posts like OP's and a lot of the others in this post don't help matters, either.
1 Freonbarb 2017-09-19
Why are you in this sub? People who prepare for a potential collapse are "kooky nuts?" You sound like a naive fool.
1 lord_geryon 2017-09-19
I'm here because this post showed up on r/all.
People who think a 'potential collapse' is in anyway going to happen are your stereotypical doomsday nuts, yes. You've managed to convince yourself that you have privileged information, that you aren't one of the sheep, that you are smarter and wiser than the naive fools, as you called me. All you are is delusional, and this sub is an echo chamber where you suck each other's cock and reinforce the delusion that you are anything other than the newest flavor of conspiracy nut.
All the money you've sank into prepping for this imminent collapse that will never occur is money wasted. You won't even use the stuff you've bought because you think you'll need it later, so enjoy patting yourself on the back and watching your money rust and rot away.
1 Freonbarb 2017-09-19
Has it ever occurred to you that I don't think a collapse is likely to occur during my lifetime, just that I'd rather be prepared on the off chance that one does happen? And if you think some sort of collapse is impossible, then its true that you are a naive fool.
I make $180K a year so its really a drop in the bucket for me. And even if a collapse does happen, I like shooting my guns at the range, I like visiting my second home in rural Montana and the truck I bought for $8k that I keep up there, and I feel comfortable having stored food, water and gasoline.
I guess it might not be worth it if I were broke, but its well worth it for me. Its probably not worth it for you, so let's hope for your sake that shit doesn't hit the fan during our lifetime.
1 Herxheim 2017-09-19
you might have heard of these things called katrina, harvey, and irma.
1 lord_geryon 2017-09-19
And the smart thing to do is leave, not try to endure it.
1 Herxheim 2017-09-19
there was no evacuation order for harvey in houston.
1 lord_geryon 2017-09-19
Do you need to be told to avoid a wasp nest too?
1 DownvoteEveryCat 2017-09-19
There's no justification for mocking someone who wants to be self-sufficient. I live in a coastal area prone to hurricanes. Should I not have a few weeks or even months worth of food, water, batteries, ammo, etc. stockpiled? To have plans and backup plans for bugging in or bugging out, or protecting my home from various types of threats? To have the materials, tools, and planning necessary to survive a catastrophe?
It would be stupid of me not to.
1 lord_geryon 2017-09-19
Preparing for a hurricane is one thing, because those actually happen, though I doubt you'll need ammunition in the face of one. Having a firearm to defend yourself from a burglar or home invasion is likewise acceptable.
However, trying to prepare for some vague potential catastrophe though, that's where it crosses the line into being nutty. What makes preppers appear more nutty is the crowing about how smart they are, how any day now the world will end. Any day now, yep, soon.
1 i_am_unikitty 2017-09-19
You're gonna feel like an asshole if they are right
1 TwoTonJoe 2017-09-19
The first rule of Prep Club is you don't talk about Prep Club.
A little OPSEC goes a long way.
1 TheMadRocker 2017-09-19
Smart preppers don't brag about prepping. They keep a low profile and some that can afford it have various cache's. The hardest thing I feel to keep is water, because of weight and space. If you have a non-contaminated well or spring your lucky. Prep all you want, just don't talk about it.
1 Creflo 2017-09-19
Any show that presents a "horror of survival" is almost certain to provide all the wrong lessons about doing so.
'Walking Dead' fools waste bullets and never seem to show anyone who properly prepared.
'Fear the Walking Dead' shows a prep group who turn their guns over to the Native American group and invite them in to their settlement.
1 facereplacer3 2017-09-19
They also disallow solar and make rainwater collection illegal.
The government wants dumb, dependent idiots fighting amongst themselves.
1 shmusko01 2017-09-19
LOL someone read their own links...
1 pbrettb 2017-09-19
maybe the plan is to cull out most of us so the planet has a chance to survive. have to admit, I'm ok with that.
1 TheRisenOsiris 2017-09-19
I'm not. The planet will survive with or without us.
1 pbrettb 2017-09-19
:-) right. I was sort of thinking 'lifeforms still extant'
1 BransonBombshell 2017-09-19
The MSM's job is to demonize and marginalize anyone or group, that doesn't abide by the globalist "rules". Fuck that. Turn that shit off. It's useless.
Go on with your prepping. We'll see who has the last laugh.
1 traillboy 2017-09-19
I agree with OP. A friend is a hydrologist for the Garrison Diversion project in ND. About two years ago he spent a lot of time in D.C lobbying against a law that would make it impossible to drill a water well on your own property for any purpose. The bill did pass, but key components were struck out allowing for a land owner to create a well on their personal property. The attempt was there. I asked him what the rationale behind this law was and he could not provide an explanation scientifically as to why it made sense. They were lobbying against it due to the amount of harm it would do to smaller (non incorporated) farms. They are actively trying to control every aspect necessary for survival.
1 Klumpenfick 2017-09-19
What's most interesting to me is that often you are said to be "hoarding gold" or stuff like that.
1 sinedup4thiscomment 2017-09-19
Anyone ever seen the trolls movie? It's actually a good movie, there's some good messages there, but jesus christ man there's such an obvious anti-prepper message there.
1 fuckingshitman11 2017-09-19
Its especially fucked up that citizens don't even have the basic agency to purchase medications for themselves. Unless you are rich then you cannot stock pile medications, even if your life depends on them like people with heart conditions.
The establishment wants you to be as dependent on them as possible. I cannot fucking understand how people advocate for voting away their own agency like with gun control and drugs. There are other ways to hedge against societal problems which preserve our rights, yet useful idiots are so quick to ban anything they don't like and have no respect for others! How the fuck is that considered progressive?!
1 Schotel 2017-09-19
I cannot take people seriously who use that term.
1 BanMikePantsNow 2017-09-19
It isn't hoarding at all that they are worried about.
1 zippityd0dah 2017-09-19
I don't know why you're being downvoted, unless people don't catch the sarcasm. Or, they are completely ignorant that this IS the way people are being portrayed.
1 shmusko01 2017-09-19
Found the nazi
1 shmusko01 2017-09-19
LOL someone read their own links...
1 Not_a_doctor_6969 2017-09-19
Walk around with a red swastika arm band chanting "blood and soil" - confirmed Nazi
It's like god damn, a white guy can't have any fun any more am I right?/s