Guaranteed last week here that Manafort was fucked and got downvoted.
10 2017-09-20 by Pineapple__Jews
:)
And the biggest scandal in US history continues to grow.
10 2017-09-20 by Pineapple__Jews
:)
And the biggest scandal in US history continues to grow.
69 comments
1 Rayfloyd 2017-09-20
yes yes utterly fucked
care telling us how?
1 Chalcosoma-atlas 2017-09-20
Well, when the guy investigating you tells you to expect an indictment, I don't know if I'd call that 'not fucked.' At this point it comes down to whether or not you believe the coverage.
1 Rayfloyd 2017-09-20
Mueller says lots of shit and has been for a year, come back with something concrete more than hearsay
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-09-20
What are you talking about? Mueller never talks. I don't even know what his voice sounds like. And his spokesperson no comments on everything.
1 Troof_sayer 2017-09-20
Are you serious? Have you EVER heard him talk? You've definitely never heard him talk about the investigation. Keep putting your head in the sand. It's called Information Aversion. Don't be blind dude. Nothing has been proven but, don't just blindly make shit up.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-09-20
I dunno... digging back to like 2006 seems more like it is regressing than growing... Manafort is prolly fucked, but I feel like he's really gonna be the only one.
1 Agrees_withyou 2017-09-20
The statement above is one I can get behind!
1 Mooseisabitfat 2017-09-20
I think he and Flynn will go down. I don't think Trump will have any legal repercussions or be impeached.
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-09-20
We'll see. I'm sure he'll try and cut a deal if he has info on...higher up people.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-09-20
If he had any deep dirt he woulda squealed by now... Not like he owes any allegiance to Trump... Only reason to withhold that info is to keep on Trumps good side for pardon bait.
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-09-20
We have no idea if he talked or not.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-09-20
Well... If he had talked they would still be focusing on him so intently. They hunt his leads... The way all this info leaks doesn't leave me hopeful that they have anything solid past Mannafort.
1 Citizen90222 2017-09-20
Flynn already asked for immunity.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
If you mean that a sitting presidential administration was using legal technicalities to spy on the campaign and then eventual successors for political reasons, while openly campaigning for his opponent, then yes this might be the biggest scandal.
1 HRCiskindacute 2017-09-20
If that were true then Obama would have leaked out the Russian story and actual phone calls before the election. Do you remember his reaction when he said Donald Trump and people booed?
"Don't boo. Vote."
All people ever do is get a bias and boo the rest.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
I agree Obama would have leaked, but the Russian story is largely bs
1 HRCiskindacute 2017-09-20
I don't know. The timeline says it could be all true.
No one even expected Trump to win the repub primaries. Then Trump's first move is to know and employ the guy who had to register as a foreign agent working on behalf of other countries and hire him as a campaign manager for president.
We have him on video saying he knows Putin then denies knowing Putin. So if it's untrue then this guy is a compulsive liar. Which in and of itself is quite common in people, imo. I'd find more comfort in that than he knows Russian mafia through New York real estate and the casino business.
1 likes-to-use-italics 2017-09-20
Yes, you may be a wee bit biased.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Not denying that. I hate modern liberals. They have an inferiority complex, they know they're losers and failures and they expect everyone else to take care of and cater to them.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
LOL yep, all the cities that are the economic and cultural powerhouses in this country (who literally subsidize all the red on that oft-touted election map) are just full of losers and failures, to the brim! Just millions and millions of people who literally keep our country running that are a bunch of losers and failures, you nailed it.
Wowow
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
True but that's what keeps your food cheap in the cities that can't produce it. By the way I'm not a republican and I live in a large city. And what the fuck is a cultural powerhouse being that you fucks are all about multiculturalism which kind of lends itself to the idea that no culture should dominate?
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
No, that's not what keeps my food cheap. I'm not talking about the Central Valley in California.
Never said you were a republican, you were just talking shit on liberals. You didn't even mention democrats? I'm confused.
And it's obvious you're confused about what the term "cultural powerhouse" means lol.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
I don't dislike all dems, some are at times better than R's. However many current dems cater to modern liberalism, which I do find repulsive. I just looked up cultural powerhouse in hope of finding a definition. There wasn't one. So no, not confused just unsure of the new Orwellian term you introduced to me
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
Cities are generally the producers of fashion/art/cuisine/film/theatre etc... you know, culture.
Orwellian? lol what is wrong with you
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Could also mean a way of life, standard beliefs and values, but yeah art and fashion so fucking important
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Perhaps you meant a really great, superior culture, in that case I assume western white culture
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
You think western white culture is the only great and superior culture? Wowowow
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Give me one that's done better
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
Haha dude I thought you were just a triggered idiot but now it turns out you're a triggered idiot white supremacist? Go back to the fuckin Donald, ain't even gonna bandy words with you anymore.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
You can't name one can you? And no I'm not triggered. Nor am I white supremacist but now that you have nothing to offer you resort to the same old tired rascist, misogynist, bigot, etc name calling
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
I can easily name many dominant cultures throughout history. On a long enough time line there's been plenty. Just because white western culture is dominant at this moment doesn't really mean much.
It's obvious you're ignorant of history though, and I'm only here to mock you - not change your ignorant mind. And really, for a guy that started this whole thing calling ALL liberals losers and failures, you're bummed about name calling? Hahaha
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
I said very specifically they have an inferiority complex. You're right they're not necessarily losers and failures but in a general sense they end up being that because they have resigned themselves to it. Not a historian, but not ignorant of it. But name one that has done more and didn't lose the advantage?
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
I mean, Arabs were inventing math and astrology and the Chinese were inventing paper and printing and sailing the world while white Europeans were mucking around in the mud and fighting over who's version of the same God was shittier. It's mainly happenstance that Europeans got out and outpaced them, but like I said, on a long enough timeline... China appears to be making a solid comeback, for example.
And wow, still with that ignorant shit. That's a broad brush for millions of your fellow countrymen, but it's obvious you're not known for your nuanced way of thought.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Everyone makes generalizations, you just did (euros mucking). Arabs were also fucking kids and took zero advantage of these discoveries. China is making a comeback with our help. If that dries up, we'll we see. You do know their cheap labor costs us intellectual property (and we are dumb for giving it to them) and all the college students they send here is a money grab by our unis. I imagine if I would have spent a year studying for the gre I would have a record score and not just enough to get in. Who took paper and made it mass media by the way? Oh yeah one of those euros mucking around. Who took math and made calculus? A mucking euro.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
Yes, in general, the Dark Ages were a super shitty time. That's not remotely the same as your idiotic broad brush. Are you offended that I characterized the Dark Ages as "mucking around in the mud"? Lol I'm of European descent, don't get your panties in a bunch.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Oh so your a modern euro. There's a reason we revolted, a good many of Americans aren't interested in cuckoldry or being raped
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Did I say the dark ages weren't shitty?
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Those of us that were of value left and built our own thing since Euroland was regressing into its shitshow.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Oh shit, euro descent, how much black you got in you? I misread your comment or are you a mexishit?
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
You still haven't answered my core question. What exactly am I ignorant of (and we can go ahead and suppose I'm not an expert in many areas, so enlighten me). You also have failed to adequately address "cultural powerhouse" unless you were in fact serious about art and fashion. I have admitted that I am biased and make generalizations; I own up to and I will gladly give you the reasons behind my biases and generalizations. Will you? Or when we finally start getting to the core you... Oh wait I remember, I'm racist, hate women and science (which if you actually read into, nvm you won't). Care to call me another name/generalization (and yes I did generalize you and frankly not so well, but I am narrowing it down).
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
I miss you bae. Guess I'll go back to the chan
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Easily? DO IT.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Are you still sure about the easily part? I'm stuck in my lab all night mostly just waiting.
1 JamesColesPardon 2017-09-20
Removed. Rule 4.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Also your candidate (I think) managed to lose to those losers and failures. Pathetic you can't even keep the losers and failures in check.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
Wait, what? "My candidate" lost to the losers and failures who are liberals? Doggy did you just have an aneurism because what in sweet hell are you talking about.
I realize that calling out your weird partisan bullshit seems to have triggered you but let's fuckin remember that words have meaning.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Who was your preferred candidate? I assumed it was Hillary and she couldn't even manipulate the loser and failures of the red states as you called them, dipshit
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
Did I... did I call the red states losers and failures? Honestly, do you smell toast right now?
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
My apologies I forgot you liberals don't do context. I should've been more clear that I was replying to your comment
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
But I never called anyone losers or failures, that was you! Top fuckin mind over here. Really broke the bank when they made ya.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
You sure as fuck implied it, but let's play word games
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
Lol, no, all I did was respond to your idiotic broad brush. Didn't imply anything. YOU'RE the one running around calling people loser and failures, then get all offended when you think I "implied" it? Lo fucking l
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
I'm not offended but I'm glad you assume my state of being.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
Sorry, defensive ;)
Not much I need to assume about you, pal. It's pretty blatant what your state of being is.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
What is my state of being?
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
Ignorant.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Ignorant of what exactly?
1 likes-to-use-italics 2017-09-20
Surveillance is not spying, and even if it were, they did a piss-poor job of it, didn't they?
No, Obama could have blown the lid off but he was afraid of influencing the election. Why kind of spy would do that?
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Ok. If surveillance isn't spying then would you be comfortable if I listened to your phone conversations and read all of your emails and monitored your internet use unbeknownst to you?
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
Are you part of a law enforcement agency conducting an investigation into criminal activity?
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Wow someone on this sub defending the patriot act? What does it matter if I'm LEO or not? Maybe I suspect you're up to no good and I'm just going to surveil you, what's the big deal?
1 Burrito_nap 2017-09-20
Uh, where the fuck I mention the patriot act. Do you think LEO's conducting surveillance as part of an investigation started with the Patriot Act?
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
you used to have to get a real warrant for that shit and have a legit reason you know like probable cause not just talking to a foreign national
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-09-20
Yeahhhh that didn't happen.
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
Susan rice admitted to it
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-09-20
No she didn't.
1 Troof_sayer 2017-09-20
She admitted to unmasking US citizens that were caught on FISA warrant taps of suspected Russian spies. Those people happened to be members of Trump's campaign and family. It could have been anyone but, it was them caught on a wire with Russian spies. However, didn't your lord and savior Jesus Trump say his campaign had NOTHING to do with Russia or Russians?
1 throwawayhrclinton 2017-09-20
A fucking fisa warrant is laughably easy to obtain (check out how many are granted vs how many aren't). Furthermore Obama by EO made unmasking and sharing that info much easier as one of his last acts as prez. Coincidence?
1 joeyisdamanya 2017-09-20
Need proof. Why not link to your comment?