WTF? Did CIA have british intelligence agency illegally spy on Trump or not?
7 2017-09-20 by 5pointlight
In March Guardian UK posts article saying it's crazy talk that Great Britain spied on Trump for the CIA. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/16/gchq-denies-wiretap-claim-trump-obama The Guardian UK now reports that GCHQ did spy on Trump plaza... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia
40 comments
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-09-20
Did you forget about Snowden?
Everyone is spied on all the time.
1 EagleOfAmerica 2017-09-20
Deserves to be stickied at the top of the sub for a month.
1 TheMadQuixotician 2017-09-20
Hear hear
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-09-20
It would clear out about 20% of the posts being submitted recently.
1 sandwichman7896 2017-09-20
I'm surprised that people are still surprised by these type of articles.
1 5pointlight 2017-09-20
We know that the NSA can spy on us at any time, we live in a surveillance state, but it is a different beast is US intelligence agencies are having foreign agencies spy on us in order to sidestep the need for warrants right?
1 trjb 2017-09-20
Any country with an intelligence service is already spying on everyday Americans, just like the NSA.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-09-20
no.
1 KnigTypo 2017-09-20
That part of the article is based on a claim by a Fox News talking head.
1 kit8642 2017-09-20
Isn't that how this whole thing works, CIA spies on the UK, GCHQ spies on the US and they share the info. That way they can claim neither are spying on their own country.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-09-20
Why do they even pretend anymore?
1 kit8642 2017-09-20
So talking heads on MSM can act astonished when someone claims the CIA is spying on everyone.
1 EyeOfTheBeast 2017-09-20
I didn't click your articles,but the title as seen on the second link explains what we were told more thaan a year ago that several European spy agencies reported they had observed people from Trump's campaign meeting with Russians.
That does not in any way imply or suggest they were asked to do so by anyone in the U.S.A.
1 5pointlight 2017-09-20
Sure, I guess it depends on whether or not they spied on US citizens on our soil. If so I think it is an enormous violation of our rights. There are multiple stories out right now that claim John Brennen had GCHQ tap the tower to avoid needing warrants. The Russian lawyer that the Trump party met with had all U.S. travel revoked long before the meeting but the Lynch DOJ had the travel ban removed for the meeting (which is suspicious). I neither like or hate Trump, I just want to live in a free rebuplic with government transparency. Will be interesting to see if these articles from sketch sites like true pundit have any validity..
1 EyeOfTheBeast 2017-09-20
Um so let's imagine what happened. Russia is hostile to Western democracies and working hard to undermine and disrupt them. We have a security agreement with most of the Western EU nations called NATO, meaning we share important security information with them.
They of course monitor Russian agents traipsing around Europe and notice people from the U.S. are meeting with some here and three. They are in fact carrying out their commitment to the NATO agreement, not violating anyone's rights when they then notify, us.
1 HBombthrow 2017-09-20
This seems to be similar to what happened in the U.S.: British intelligence agencies are tapping shady Russian agents, Trump campaign people pop into the mix, U.K. intelligence goes "WTF we better tell the Yanks about this."
1 Guerrilla_Time 2017-09-20
Ya. 2nd article points more towards Trump camp going "oh shit" than "they spied on us illegally".
"oh shit" cause the people they were in secret contact with were being watch for one reason or another and they got caught in it.
1 KnigTypo 2017-09-20
What law was broken?
1 EagleOfAmerica 2017-09-20
The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
1 KnigTypo 2017-09-20
Does that apply to U.K. Citizens now? And doesn't it apply to search and seizure?
1 EagleOfAmerica 2017-09-20
You just said Donald Trump is a citizen of the UK.
1 KnigTypo 2017-09-20
I was referring to the U.K. Investigator, who OP implied broke a law.
1 EagleOfAmerica 2017-09-20
That's called "spying" and it's a death penalty offense.
1 KnigTypo 2017-09-20
The U.K. Investigator was not operating in the US, and please cite which capital crime.
1 EagleOfAmerica 2017-09-20
Are you seriously arguing that foreign agents surveiling a US official is not spying? Do you know what the word spying means?
1 KnigTypo 2017-09-20
For starters, trump wasn't a us official when this took place. Second, the allegation is based on a statement from a Fox News talking head. Third, I assume many us officials have been spied upon by foreign agencies abroad and they aren't subject to US law.
1 EagleOfAmerica 2017-09-20
You're literally claiming that foreign surveillance of the President of the United States isn't a crime. Have a nice day.
1 KnigTypo 2017-09-20
You are claiming that US laws apply to foreign countries.
1 EagleOfAmerica 2017-09-20
I'm not explaining jurisdiction to you.
1 KnigTypo 2017-09-20
That's probably a good idea, since you claim the us has jurisdiction on foreign soil.
1 EagleOfAmerica 2017-09-20
The acts were not done on foreign soil. They were done on US soil, thus conferring jurisdiction.
1 KnigTypo 2017-09-20
That's you're conjecture, it's not stated in the article.
Since the entire premise is based on an unproven claim by a Fox News host, it's all bullshit anyways.
1 LDLover 2017-09-20
Considering the reporting on this has changed each time new info comes out, I will say that there are some reports that gchq was doing the surveillance from fort Meade under the supervision of the NSA. the source I saw it is not one I deem credible but these types of sources appear to be proving the MSM wrong time and time again this year so I'm not writing it off just yet.
1 KnigTypo 2017-09-20
Well, the source of this rumor was a Msm source talking head with a known bias.
1 prop_synch 2017-09-20
There was a FISA warrant on Manafort for years because he is a criminal.
1 5pointlight 2017-09-20
Maybe so but why should the NSA and British GCHQ lie about whether or not GCHQ tapped the phones if it was legal? They were adamantly denying in March...
1 prop_synch 2017-09-20
FISA warrant wasn't public. It's called a secret.
1 LDLover 2017-09-20
If a FISA warrant was approved, why get British intelligence to do the work?
1 prop_synch 2017-09-20
I don't know what your hard on for the Brits is. I don't think some secret cabal in the CIA directed the Brits to do anything. Manafort was surveilled, not Trump. The fact that Manafort lived in Trump's building is being used by Cronies of Orange Julius to justify his idiotic Obama wiretap claim.
1 5pointlight 2017-09-20
Sweet! Sitting at Zero upvotes, must have found something good!
1 5pointlight 2017-09-20
Sure, I guess it depends on whether or not they spied on US citizens on our soil. If so I think it is an enormous violation of our rights. There are multiple stories out right now that claim John Brennen had GCHQ tap the tower to avoid needing warrants. The Russian lawyer that the Trump party met with had all U.S. travel revoked long before the meeting but the Lynch DOJ had the travel ban removed for the meeting (which is suspicious). I neither like or hate Trump, I just want to live in a free rebuplic with government transparency. Will be interesting to see if these articles from sketch sites like true pundit have any validity..
1 EagleOfAmerica 2017-09-20
Are you seriously arguing that foreign agents surveiling a US official is not spying? Do you know what the word spying means?
1 LDLover 2017-09-20
Considering the reporting on this has changed each time new info comes out, I will say that there are some reports that gchq was doing the surveillance from fort Meade under the supervision of the NSA. the source I saw it is not one I deem credible but these types of sources appear to be proving the MSM wrong time and time again this year so I'm not writing it off just yet.