Do you have any evidence that Rothschild is involved, or is mostly just a funny feeling?

Probably not. They are just the fall guy family

Or evidence of hurricane manufacturing...

Or FEMA camp prisons where they force microchips into you.

You mean like … in the butt?

That's actually the only part of this that I think could happen in the real world.

It's ok. My insiders say hurricanes happen during this time of year because of natural and historic weather patterns and things will be fine. There was also an insider on 9gag that said the same thing.

You're just going to need to do better. How about at least some links? Why are your "insiders" believable?

This is a joke right? You think these insiders have a clue?

Why don't you do research for yourself to figure out why its happening.

Did you know that we are in a La Nina phase, which keeps the waters warmer longer in the fall? Do you understand weather patterns and air circulation? Do you understand the Coriolis effect? Do you understand what water vapor, carbon dioxide and methane do to our atmosphere? Do you understand types of radiation in wavelengths? Do you then understand how this can all effect hurricanes?

If not, you have some work to do. My piece of advice is don't go looking for insiders, go looking for scientists.

By hurricane season, yes.

The insiders I follow have been all saying this.

The insiders you follow have been consistently full of hot air.

Well not really, man. You're entitled to your own opinions, but you're not entitled to your own facts.

Nobody dictates facts. They're facts because they're facts. This is some pretty grade-school stuff, here.

Ok so if the news tells me that Chemtrails aren't bad for our health

It doesn't, because "chemtrails" are a myth. They literally do not exist.

How is one to know whether their many beliefs are facts or simply misunderstandings.

In modern life, one is expected (a) to have a basic education about the world, (b) be able to distinguish between things which are known to be true and things which are asserted, and (c) have the basic reading and comprehension skills to seek out and obtain additional information before coming to a conclusion.

Let's use your example. Is there any evidence in the entire world that "chemtrails" are a real thing? We know what contrails are, and how they're formed, and which conditions permit them and which don't. Is there a single piece of evidence to support the existence of "chemtrails?"

Chemtrails may not be a thing. Chemically induced weather modification is a thing, and there is a patent trail to support that

You are seriously claiming that there is no such thing as the Deep State ?

Chemically induced weather modification is a thing

Cloud-seeding isn't really chemical. It's a physical process involving "seeding" the air with tiny particles to create nucleation sites for raindrops. There's no chemistry involved.

You are seriously claiming that there is no such thing as the Deep State ?

I didn't "claim" it. I stated it as a fact. You might notice we were talking about the nature of facts before you got here.

Are those tiny particles made of chemicals? What kinds?

Literally all matter is "made of chemicals."

Yeah, but what kinds, specifically? They may cause aberrative clouds or have other unintended effects. What are the substrates made of?

Depends entirely on the particular usage. There's no universal standard choice. Even ordinary granulated table salt has been used.

Yes, and beyond common salt?

https://www.nap.edu/read/18988/chapter/11

Salt isn't an element. Silver iodide is not "common salt".

If the atmosphere is composed of particular quantifiable elements, and you introduce elements with the intention of effecting changes, it seems to me that this meets the basic definition of chemistry. Additionally, I spoke of weather modification, which entails more than cloud seeding.

Also, you spoke of everyone being entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts. I'm paraphrasing, but I trust you would agree that this is basically what you stated. Yet you offer zero proof to substantiate your "fact" that the Deep State does not exist. Please elaborate

That is not the definition of chemistry, no. Chemistry is the study of chemical reactions. Cloud-seeding is not a chemical reaction. It's a purely physical one. Water droplets at altitude form around nucleation sites — which are just small particles of whatever — and then fall as rain.

There's no such thing as a "deep state" because there's no evidence to support its existence.

The science is not conclusive. But the idea that theoretical chemists are studying ice nucleation to attempt to discover exactly what chemical processes are occurring leads to a rather simple conclusion that weather modification, aka cloud seeding is certainly chemistry

My definition might have been painful, but the only word it lacked was reaction.

http://cen.acs.org/articles/94/i22/Does-cloud-seeding-really-work.html

Even if that were a valid interpretation (which it isn't), so what? If you extend your definition that far then literally everything that happens is some species of chemistry, so what's the issue?

It's one or the other. Valid or invalid. Chemists that most certainly understand chemistry better than you or I don't understand it. You offer the opinion that it isn't a valid assumption that dispersing different elements at different temperatures and the resulting reaction are chemistry. You offer nothing but your opinion to prove this. Freaking theoretical chemists are uncertain whether there is chemistry occurring, but your opinion that it is a purely physical reaction is sufficient ? That don't play in Peoria, as the Goldstein Trio were fond of saying.

Additionally, spraying lead oxide, silver iodide, aluminum oxide or barium into the atmosphere in various states at wildly varying temperatures isn't known to be safe. In fact, those elements and compounds are known to be unsafe for human exposure.

I ain't buying the Rothschild clap-trap, but it sure as fuck ain't tiddlywinks

You offer the opinion that it isn't a valid assumption that dispersing different elements at different temperatures and the resulting reaction are chemistry.

You missed the more important part. What if it is?

In fact, those elements and compounds are known to be unsafe for human exposure.

They're not elements. They're compounds. And actually yes, those are all totally safe in the concentration in which they've been used. If they weren't safe in those concentrations, then people wouldn't have used them in those concentrations. Duh.

Then, of course, there's the fact that these salts you named aren't actually used any more in favor of inert hygroscopics like, as I mentioned, ordinary table salt.

Barium is an element. The other compounds named are not harmless. They are measured for risk in ppm or ppb.

Silver iodide, still the preferred compound for seeding, is not ordinary table salt. Nor is it harmless.

I cannot point to any concrete evidence to prove conclusively that the Deep State does exist. But I think one can make a compelling circumstantial case for it by examining the nexus between the intelligence community, defense contractors, black budgets and drug smuggling. Many of these activities are conducted beyond the purview of elected officials, and are often at odds with stated or implied interests of the US

Okay. Make that compelling case.

Also, unless you have some reason to assume I could t follow your statements of facts unsupported by any...er...actual facts I'm not certain why you would assume sarcasm is warranted, or even effective for that matter. As a go to, sarcasm typifies an inferior intellect. But that is merely my opinion, not a provable, objective fact

I didn't say anything sarcastically.

"I didn't "claim" it. I stated it as a fact. You might notice we were talking about the nature of facts before you got here."

It read sarcastically. I obviously misunderstood you

We all know it 🐙 the second Harvey hit the shit hit the fan. I hear November 4th ANTIFA is trying to demand trump out of office. Ill believe it when I see it. Hoping they're not that stupid.

I'm not taking this sub seriously until you all stop laughing at me about remembering hurricane john

What happened with hurricane John?

He thinks hurricane Jose was actually John. He's wrong and he's a dick about it too.

Hehehe.... John.. Hehe

Which Rothschild? There are several.

The one that controls the weather.

Siting Rothschild has become short hand for "I put no effort into the actual theory whatsoever".

The Rothschilds have become Keyser Soze.

An evil mastermind with a secret floating island in the Atlanta which generates hurricanes would be an interesting movie plot.

Should the screenplay be more comedy, like Austin Powers, or serious like a James Bond film?

It's Barbuda. And it's amazing how with so many achievements in science and the history of the world, people laugh against the fact that it might be feasible to trigger climate catastrophes.

Or FEMA camp prisons where they force microchips into you.

I didn't say anything sarcastically.

Salt isn't an element. Silver iodide is not "common salt".