Is there an excuse that makes any sense whatsoever as to why NIST refuses to publish their 9/11 data for peer review.
46 2017-09-23 by naturalproducer
NIST's stated reason sounds like...
I could tell you but then I'd have to kill you.
46 2017-09-23 by naturalproducer
NIST's stated reason sounds like...
I could tell you but then I'd have to kill you.
7 comments
1 Putin_loves_cats 2017-09-23
Pretty sure they said: "National security". Which is a crock of shit, and we all know it.
1 Kimbellinie 2017-09-23
That's normally their go to on the cool crap we want to actually know about.
1 dustbowldano 2017-09-23
That's probably my favorite right up there with "accidently deleted/destroyed," "lost in moving," or the always classic fully redacted document.
1 trombonetoe 2017-09-23
Oy Vey goyim, go watch television instead of asking too many questions or we will reduce your soylent ratio for next month by 20% and your basic income for the rest of the year by 30%.
1 33spacecowboys 2017-09-23
Stop asking for money and get a job.
1 alienrefugee51 2017-09-23
Because then the brainwashed "will know".
1 Lobos1988 2017-09-23
Fear