There are 7500 users online. Probably safe to say at least a few thousand of those are shills / bots, especially since the top threads are getting astroturfed hard.
The discussion in the private conspiracy subs is markedly different.
i ssumed as much but how the hell do i do that? lol how do i prove im not a shill for them to accept me? i really want to find a group that isnt so controlled and shilled
I'll browse your profile over the next few days. If I'm convinced you're legit I'll forward you to the mods for consideration. If they're convinced you're legit they may invite you.
if i was a dude who wanted to keep conspiracies hidden and i just read your comment..... i mean, it would be very easy to penetrate whatever lil secret sub you have now.
keep in mind some of my older posts show my ignorance early on, i have since grown as a person and am actively trying to identify the paradigms in which i filter info with the intention of losing my programming.
After a brief browse through your profile I don't see anything that raises immediate red flags. Give me a couple days to browse more thoroughly and I may recommend you.
What do you mean by legit? That the person under consideration already agrees with the group? I definitely love to analyze and test theories but I don’t just follow along unless the argument is compelling. What is an example in the private conversation that is different from the open one? If it’s just people agreeing with each other that isn’t necessarily a good way to get to the bottom of a hypothesis.
Okay definitely like to investigate and learn and question things and would love to see the more detailed discussion. Not sure how to prove or disprove shillness, I shit post like the next person but one thing I do know for certain is that I don’t get paid for posting.
Sorry, after a brief overview of your history I do not feel comfortable recommending you. Too much participation in /r/enoughtrumpspam, /r/esist, and /r/politics.
Too bad. I definitely think Trump is no different than the rest but that doesn’t mean I don’t tow the line with the other side. I question all of them and they are all complicit.
Yeah “don’t” was a miss type. I don’t support the D or the R but I do support issues that push individual rights and favor the non top 5% of the economic scale.
Definitely not that. I don’t support any parties, religions, or corporations (I distrust all of them) but I do push for policies that focus on people first before governments. I support polices on both sides of the political spectrum if they intersect my ideals. Normally not vocal on that but given the right environment I could add to a discussion.
Sorry, was eating.
So I have a lot of different thoughts here mostly because I was involved from a military pov as I was on active duty at the time.
The day of - comms were shit and wonky.
I do think the pentagon was hit by a plane as I have friends the day of that were there and I got real time feedback.
I do think the plane over PN did not get overrun. Can’t say more there.
The intelligence was ignored - on purpose or through negligence I can’t say but when dealing with Bush Jr I lean to ignorance.
Where there folks that knew it was coming based on intel you better believe it. Israel damn straight. All of their government definitely not.
That’s the problem most in the government are unwitting actors.
After a brief browse through your profile I don't see anything that raises immediate red flags. Give me a couple days to browse more thoroughly and I may recommend you.
Yeah “don’t” was a miss type. I don’t support the D or the R but I do support issues that push individual rights and favor the non top 5% of the economic scale.
Sorry, was eating.
So I have a lot of different thoughts here mostly because I was involved from a military pov as I was on active duty at the time.
The day of - comms were shit and wonky.
I do think the pentagon was hit by a plane as I have friends the day of that were there and I got real time feedback.
I do think the plane over PN did not get overrun. Can’t say more there.
The intelligence was ignored - on purpose or through negligence I can’t say but when dealing with Bush Jr I lean to ignorance.
Where there folks that knew it was coming based on intel you better believe it. Israel damn straight. All of their government definitely not.
That’s the problem most in the government are unwitting actors.
44 comments
1 hot_dratsum 2017-10-04
If there really is a conspiracy, the CIA is loving the fact that reddit is muddying the waters with all sorts of crazy ass claims.
1 mtnduck 2017-10-04
exactly what I'm saying man, if i wasn't clear :)
1 Stumpedmytoe 2017-10-04
Alex jones has Reddit beat by a million don’t worry 😉
1 pinkyzup 2017-10-04
Ergo Alex Jones works for the CIA
1 Folwart 2017-10-04
Therefore the CIA runs reddit.
1 HempCO719 2017-10-04
Therefore Bill Hicks is our master
1 pby1000 2017-10-04
They are probably switching browsers between here and their favorite CP sites.
1 OperationGladioB 2017-10-04
https://www.yahoo.com/news/blogs/upshot/pentagon-declined-investigate-hundreds-purchases-child-pornography.html
1 pby1000 2017-10-04
LOL. Yep. I know the ways of the world, and more people are learning, too. I have received quite the education the past year or so.
1 orionquest2016 2017-10-04
I see 7.7k users currently; double or triple than average.
1 RecoveringGrace 2017-10-04
The weirdest part about that is that those kinds of numbers started Fri night.
1 Deathbytiger 2017-10-04
Their greatest weapon is turning us against ourselves.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
There are 7500 users online. Probably safe to say at least a few thousand of those are shills / bots, especially since the top threads are getting astroturfed hard.
The discussion in the private conspiracy subs is markedly different.
1 HangryBuffaloBill 2017-10-04
are you saying there are private subs where any ol moron cant just join? i didnt know this, how can one join?
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
Yes. By invitation.
1 HangryBuffaloBill 2017-10-04
i ssumed as much but how the hell do i do that? lol how do i prove im not a shill for them to accept me? i really want to find a group that isnt so controlled and shilled
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
I'll browse your profile over the next few days. If I'm convinced you're legit I'll forward you to the mods for consideration. If they're convinced you're legit they may invite you.
1 mtnduck 2017-10-04
if i was a dude who wanted to keep conspiracies hidden and i just read your comment..... i mean, it would be very easy to penetrate whatever lil secret sub you have now.
1 HangryBuffaloBill 2017-10-04
keep in mind some of my older posts show my ignorance early on, i have since grown as a person and am actively trying to identify the paradigms in which i filter info with the intention of losing my programming.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
After a brief browse through your profile I don't see anything that raises immediate red flags. Give me a couple days to browse more thoroughly and I may recommend you.
1 HangryBuffaloBill 2017-10-04
awesome thank you so much!
1 gandalfsbastard 2017-10-04
What do you mean by legit? That the person under consideration already agrees with the group? I definitely love to analyze and test theories but I don’t just follow along unless the argument is compelling. What is an example in the private conversation that is different from the open one? If it’s just people agreeing with each other that isn’t necessarily a good way to get to the bottom of a hypothesis.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
As in I believe you're a conspiracy theorist and not a shill.
1 gandalfsbastard 2017-10-04
Okay definitely like to investigate and learn and question things and would love to see the more detailed discussion. Not sure how to prove or disprove shillness, I shit post like the next person but one thing I do know for certain is that I don’t get paid for posting.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
Sorry, after a brief overview of your history I do not feel comfortable recommending you. Too much participation in /r/enoughtrumpspam, /r/esist, and /r/politics.
1 gandalfsbastard 2017-10-04
Too bad. I definitely think Trump is no different than the rest but that doesn’t mean I don’t tow the line with the other side. I question all of them and they are all complicit.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
I'm not sure what you mean by that. It seems like your views are pretty clearly in favor of one side.
1 gandalfsbastard 2017-10-04
Yeah “don’t” was a miss type. I don’t support the D or the R but I do support issues that push individual rights and favor the non top 5% of the economic scale.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
Ok, I'm willing to do a deeper check over the next few days, but I generally do not trust partisans.
1 gandalfsbastard 2017-10-04
Definitely not that. I don’t support any parties, religions, or corporations (I distrust all of them) but I do push for policies that focus on people first before governments. I support polices on both sides of the political spectrum if they intersect my ideals. Normally not vocal on that but given the right environment I could add to a discussion.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
Ok, I'll read you a bit more.
Here's a question: what is your take on 9/11?
1 gandalfsbastard 2017-10-04
Sorry, was eating. So I have a lot of different thoughts here mostly because I was involved from a military pov as I was on active duty at the time. The day of - comms were shit and wonky. I do think the pentagon was hit by a plane as I have friends the day of that were there and I got real time feedback. I do think the plane over PN did not get overrun. Can’t say more there. The intelligence was ignored - on purpose or through negligence I can’t say but when dealing with Bush Jr I lean to ignorance. Where there folks that knew it was coming based on intel you better believe it. Israel damn straight. All of their government definitely not. That’s the problem most in the government are unwitting actors.
1 RedSoxDamageControl 2017-10-04
Ooh! Do me too!
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
Not really a conspiracy theorist as far as I can tell, so no.
1 yummypeanutjelly 2017-10-04
I'd like an invitation if it's possible. Thanks
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
I browsed your profile a bit, and I don't see any immediate red flags, give me a couple days to dig a little deeper and I may recommend you.
1 yummypeanutjelly 2017-10-04
Thanks, I'd love to be a part of that.. I don't post much, I mostly read and comment.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
I've posted like 10 things in 10 years :)
1 fedalizofranz 2017-10-04
Can i join too??
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
No post history, absolutely not.
1 DefNotJRossiter 2017-10-04
Would love to be considered for an invite as well.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
I don't see any obvious reason to believe you're a shill, but I also don't see much evidence of participation in /r/conspiracy.
1 DefNotJRossiter 2017-10-04
I read mostly. Typically try to avoid commenting due to not enjoying confrontation.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
Maybe so, but I don't feel that I have enough information to make an informed recommendation.
1 DefNotJRossiter 2017-10-04
All good man, no skin off my teeth :)
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
Feel free to ask again in the future if you think you've established a history that represents your views.
1 DefNotJRossiter 2017-10-04
Haha, unlikely that'll happen. But thanks for looking into it :)
1 DefNotJRossiter 2017-10-04
All good man, no skin off my teeth :)
1 fedalizofranz 2017-10-04
I only read stuff i dont really post much how do i prove stuff
1 mtnduck 2017-10-04
exactly what I'm saying man, if i wasn't clear :)
1 Stumpedmytoe 2017-10-04
Alex jones has Reddit beat by a million don’t worry 😉
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
I browsed your profile a bit, and I don't see any immediate red flags, give me a couple days to dig a little deeper and I may recommend you.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
After a brief browse through your profile I don't see anything that raises immediate red flags. Give me a couple days to browse more thoroughly and I may recommend you.
1 gandalfsbastard 2017-10-04
Yeah “don’t” was a miss type. I don’t support the D or the R but I do support issues that push individual rights and favor the non top 5% of the economic scale.
1 obsessile 2017-10-04
Maybe so, but I don't feel that I have enough information to make an informed recommendation.
1 gandalfsbastard 2017-10-04
Sorry, was eating. So I have a lot of different thoughts here mostly because I was involved from a military pov as I was on active duty at the time. The day of - comms were shit and wonky. I do think the pentagon was hit by a plane as I have friends the day of that were there and I got real time feedback. I do think the plane over PN did not get overrun. Can’t say more there. The intelligence was ignored - on purpose or through negligence I can’t say but when dealing with Bush Jr I lean to ignorance. Where there folks that knew it was coming based on intel you better believe it. Israel damn straight. All of their government definitely not. That’s the problem most in the government are unwitting actors.