R/conspiracy, here's you're chance to be relevant

34  2017-10-09 by callmebaiken

Late last night a few of us began discussing a piece of the Las Vegas case that is extremely important and could blow the thing wide open.

This is Rm 32134 and Brian Hodge's claim that he was staying in that room where shots were fired from.

If Hodge had that room, then Paddock would have had to have found a way in, which is a story in and of itself, even within the official narrative.

This raises several questions that are still crucial that no one in the mainstream OR alternative media is asking

But it's getting buried under the same YouTube videos posted 100 times already. We need this stickied to the front page

We all need to be tweeting it and emailing it to every reporter investigating the shooting. This is the only place discussing this crucial bombshell. This is our chance to actually be relevant.

Email the MODS. Tell them we need a sticky at the top about rm 32134

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/75520r/have_we_overlooked_something_huge/

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/755tum/who_was_staying_in_rm_35134/

28 comments

Or could of Hodge's really been room 133?

He also said "they killed a security guard on my floor, my room is a crime scene"

Hodges went all the way to the bottom floor and hid in the bushes? Some of his story sounds like BS as well

Yes, his story is possibly BS. Yes, he could be mistaken about his room number. But he's repeated his story a dozen times to multiple media outlets and on his Facebook page and every time he's remained adamant he was staying in the room shots were first fired from. Kind of important, no?

Want to put some links up? Haven't even heard about this yet.

https://imgur.com/a/SNWfJ - post of Aussie guy claiming room 32134 at 3:27am https://imgur.com/a/7ujAo -10:29pm: his status after he had ran to the bushes https://imgur.com/a/yQFiu - being rescued shortly after 1:13am

I posted this in a different thread about Hodge too. I think it's an important detail that is being overlooked. Since he is the closest guy we have to Paddock at the time of the shooting. Would be good to get actual confirmation of his room number though, especially if he has changed the story as others have claimed

It sounds like BS, hopefully the SMH (Australia's NYT) did a little fact checking. Because that is a huge claim.

I mean how does one go about getting their shit back from a crime scene like this.... That would be a big part of my story, like any lost luggage is always a part of a story about a flight.

If Brian ha just telling the truth and hasn't confused his room number the fact that he was in that room and Paddock broke into his room should have been in the first paragraph of every news story since day one and the first question that every news conference with the sheriff

It's a huge inconsistency and definitely should be followed up.

Maybe all that room is is a shitty murder scene and paddock is just a patsy. Maybe they had bigger plans but failed. Maybe nobody died and all the shots were blanks.

Don't know, but it all really sounds like a red herring to me, without absolute inside information we won't know shit. What we do know is that we are enslaved by the owners of the federal reserve, they are likely very linked to this, the complicit media, the government, their perpetual wars and so on.

Ok, buddy, ok. One thing at a time.

I work in a hotel. People forget what room they were in before they to the desk to check out

You're right, we should just ignore this /s

I didnt like you from your choice of wording in the title, and you've just reaffirmed my gut reaction. I'm not saying anything should be ignored, just offering some additional information I know from personal experience on hotel guest behavior.

Yes, he could be mistaken about his room number. But he's repeated his story a dozen times to multiple media outlets and on his Facebook page and every time he's remained adamant he was staying in 134

These are linked outlets and they probably ran with the SMH story.

I agree. It's absolutely possible that Brian Hodge was not staying in room 134. However, I just don't see how we can dismiss it as that and move on when these stories have not been retracted.

No way would I dismiss it, it's a very good lead.

There was zero shooters.

Why do you think this is such a big deal that it would "blow open" the case?

If Hodge was staying in the room, how did Paddock get in the room to smash the window and shoot out of it?

It's come to my attention that the inside door locks automatically anytime it's shut. So that solves at least the mystery of why both were locked from the inside when the SWAT team arrived. Just need to investigate Brian Hodge's claim now

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1186772/pg213

this is also interesting to look at. If Brian's claim is true, then this suggests that Paddock gained access to Brian's room and used it to set up cameras before the shooting even happened? That picture pretty much confirms that Paddock used both 32134 and 32135. It is most likely that Brian has lied about it. But it also suggests that Paddock had to switch rooms via hallway or other entrances during the shooting. Idk, weird.

Well, someone has told me that the adjoining inside doors lock automatically anytime they're shut. So we're down to just the Brian Hodge mystery.

Wish we had some solid proof he deffo stayed in that room

He probably has a confirmation email that he could screenshot

What I was thinking exactly. He's probably getting bombarded with messages on fb right now. I also saw a few comments on his Facebook asking if he really was staying in room 32134, no response

Lot of good in that thread. Maybe I'm on the wrong website

I sent the following email to

newsdesk@smh.com.au

In your article dated October 2nd http://www.smh.com.au/world/hardcore-las-vegas-shooter-in-room-next-door-says-australian-man-brian-hodge-20171002-gysy9v you quoted a man named Brian Hodge as claiming that he was staying in room 134 on the 32nd floor of Mandalay Bay. However that room was used by the shooter to break out the window and fire shots from. Why has there been no follow-up on this incredible statement? Do you stand by your initial reporting or will you be retracting that story?

Perhaps everyone interested can write them their own unique email

If Hodge was staying in the room, how did Paddock get in the room to smash the window and shoot out of it?

He probably has a confirmation email that he could screenshot