Harvey Weinstein executive producing a documentary exposing Trump secrets - out in 2018
2 2017-10-13 by westwhat-westworld
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt6898730/
Another reason he is being thrust into the spotlight?
2 2017-10-13 by westwhat-westworld
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt6898730/
Another reason he is being thrust into the spotlight?
41 comments
1 ShallowendPirate 2017-10-13
That makes sense. If Weinstein is really out to get Trump, it stands to reason that Trump would fight back. It raises a couple of questions, though. Like, what is Weinstein going to put out that would damn Trump enough to ruin his whole life/career?
1 westwhat-westworld 2017-10-13
Right - why is he doing movies that put him in the line of fire if he has all these skeletons in his closet? It's horrible to think about, but it must mean Trump has done something worse then systemic sexual assault and abuse. Cause Weinstein wouldn't have blinked an eye at that.
1 ShallowendPirate 2017-10-13
Or it's a diversion. Look at how bad Trump is, he walked back stage at the Miss Teen USA contest. Yeah, thats bad and gross. Weinstein actually assaulted these kids/people. I don't think he views one as worse than the other, just that "Trump did this, and no one is going to say anything about me because they'll be black-balled."
It's a testimate to the ego involved in this whole thing. People with money and/or power fear losing their money and power. Thats why they do such shitty things to stay in a position of power, and keep making money.
1 westwhat-westworld 2017-10-13
That's a good point, I underestimate the egos on these people. It's weird to think this guys living in a glass house throwing stones around, but I guess that's a testament to how much power they have and how safe they feel in their depravity.
1 ShallowendPirate 2017-10-13
Now that shits falling apart, Hollywood is shitting it's collective pants. Good. Fuck em anyway.... or I guess don't unless you're of age, and you want to.
1 fire_in_our_throats 2017-10-13
It'll be interesting to see if allegations are brought against Moore.
1 litre_cola9 2017-10-13
Pretty sure Michael Moore may be a kiddy diddler too
1 westwhat-westworld 2017-10-13
And the downvoting shills are at it again. Why not comment why you're downvoting?
1 inyourarea 2017-10-13
Rule 10
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
If Trump had dirty secrets, the largest intelligence communities in the world were spying on him, we would have known them before the election and Killary would be president right now.
1 westwhat-westworld 2017-10-13
Are you really saying you don't think Trump has dirty secrets? And your proof is that if he did, we'd know, cause intelligence agencies are so transparent and honest with their citizens.
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
I am saying he doesn't, but not for the strawman reasons you state. But because those agencies are filled with bias political hacks that leak shit to the press constantly. So yes....we would know...
1 westwhat-westworld 2017-10-13
Are you suggesting that everyone in power is not corrupt, because if they were, intelligence agencies would know, and it would be leaked?
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
Nope, I am suggesting that the bias political hacks in the intelligence agencies have a clear axe to grind with Trump specifically based on the amount of leaking involving Trump specifically. So if there was more about Trump we would know it.
1 westwhat-westworld 2017-10-13
Forgive me for trying to clarify and understand your point... But I would argue that the hacks have been non-partisan. Especially considering the focus on Hillary and Podesta. Nothing has been leaked that did any damage at all to Trump. He's sitting pretty right now.
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
What focus on Hillary and Podesta? You mean wikileaks? What does that have to do with our intelligence agencies? Nothing has been leaked that did any real damage to Trump because there isn't anything of consequence to leak... that's the entire point of this conversation.... You really just need to let it go an realize you are being manipulated into hating Trump..
1 westwhat-westworld 2017-10-13
lol I hate Trump for the things he's done and the things he stands for. Things that are out in the open. I think 16 accusations of sexual assault and an open admission to regularly doing so is a good place to start.
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
Accusations with no proof, that were concocted to manipulate you into hating him.
1 dogcatfishlion 2017-10-13
YEAH ITS NOT TRUE OKAY TRUMP IS A GOOD GUY I SWEAR
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
Typing things in all caps is not proof.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
People hated Trump before he ran for President, pal. He didn't just suddenly appear on the national scene two years ago.
He's a piece of shit, and has been for years. You're handwaving a power abuser and self-admitted sexual assaulter.
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
Actually it's the opposite, no body had a problem with Trump until he ran against a Democrat. Then all the sudden he was magically a racist.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
You're kidding, dude. People have been making fun/hating him for years. "Short fingered vulgarian" was from the fucking mid 80s, even.
Quit trying to push some bullshit narrative.
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
I'm not pushing anything but truth, you are just triggered because you know its the truth and it goes against your narrative.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
What? People have literally been hating him for decades, and I just provided you with proof of that. What are you on about?
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
You typing something does not equal proof.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
But that's an established fact. Do you really need me to link proof?
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
Yep
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/10/graydon-carter-donald-trump
He's been hated for decades. Nice try and your revisionist history, though.
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
That's one persons opinion from 2015, After he announced he was running for President. Like I said, nobody disliked Trump until after he decided to run for President. Nice try tho...
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
Dude, that's them talking about their long running feud. He called Trump a short fingered vulgarian in SPY magazine in 1988.
Can you even read?
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
So your source is 1 person, and that 1 person is someone that has a long running feud? Doesn't seem very objective or the most honest source of information. I bet there is more than 1 person in your life that would insult you if asked. Please dude, you are so brainwashed.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
Christ, they not teach critical thinking anymore?
Donald Trump has been in the public eye for literally decades, and people have hated him for decades (including me). And that isn't "some guy," that's the editor of SPY and later Vogue.
I'm old, man. I used to listen to Stern. He wasn't on Stern because he was a cool dude who everyone liked, he was on Stern all the time because he's a fucking clown, a caricature of a rich piece of shit.
You actually think a guy who was born on third with a golden spoon in his mouth, who literally shits in a golden toilet on the tippy top of a giant tower is on your side - and i'm the brainwashed one?
L O fucking L.
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
You know how to critically think because you read a magazine and listened to Howard Stern? K, I'm done with this conversation, you are clearly borderline mentally retarded.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
lol it's like you can read but don't understand the meaning behind words.
Again, my only point is that he's been in the public eye for decades, and people have hated him for decades. He wasn't an unknown prior to running, and people have disliked him foreeeever. He's a shitty reality tv star. That's it. You can't seem to handle that, so you plug your ears and pretend you don't know how to read.
Later lil buddy.
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
lol, you need help, seek it please.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
Listen, we get it, you lost the argument.
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
I stopped the conversation because I realized I was talking to an actual retarded person. Sure thing, you win...lol
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
Haha no, you stopped the conversation because I presented evidence and took a stance and you had nothing. You've drank the kool-aid so anything that fucks with said kool-aid hurts your brain and you take a run for it.
1 tultham1 2017-10-13
Yes you provided 'evidence', you linked 1 article on the opinion of 1 person, good boy.
1 Burrito_nap 2017-10-13
Wew lad you're in over your head here
1 biggumsmcdee 2017-10-13
Also Doing the vaccine film with De Niro
1 ShallowendPirate 2017-10-13
Or it's a diversion. Look at how bad Trump is, he walked back stage at the Miss Teen USA contest. Yeah, thats bad and gross. Weinstein actually assaulted these kids/people. I don't think he views one as worse than the other, just that "Trump did this, and no one is going to say anything about me because they'll be black-balled."
It's a testimate to the ego involved in this whole thing. People with money and/or power fear losing their money and power. Thats why they do such shitty things to stay in a position of power, and keep making money.
1 westwhat-westworld 2017-10-13
Forgive me for trying to clarify and understand your point... But I would argue that the hacks have been non-partisan. Especially considering the focus on Hillary and Podesta. Nothing has been leaked that did any damage at all to Trump. He's sitting pretty right now.
1 westwhat-westworld 2017-10-13
lol I hate Trump for the things he's done and the things he stands for. Things that are out in the open. I think 16 accusations of sexual assault and an open admission to regularly doing so is a good place to start.