A windblown match is a "directed thermal weapon"

More like a windblown cigarette butt. While I've got the microphone, fuk you shitbags that litter your burning cigarettes! I feel better thanks.

Lol

I saw a video the other day claiming this and I don't really buy it. I use to work in the construction industry and still do, but as a supplier, and alot of, if not most houses and 3-4 story hotels are built with wood. With that said, I'm still very skeptical of them blaming PG&E infrastructure failing and cause 7 different fires accross a large area in less than 2 hours. I could be wrong, but this past winter we were rocked with storm after storm, and find it gard to believe some how the winds we saw last Saturday/Sunday were capable of cause those fires.

how do you explain melted cars? And the pictures of houses completely gone, and some trees still standing. Makes no sense

Most cars are made with plastic, I can most likely bang out a dent in any car in the last 20 years with a heat gun, compressed air and my hand.

Can you provide a link, haven't seen those. Could also be the plastic melting, but I'll take a look and let you know what I think.

That's what I thought, and I appreciate the update, and don't take this responce as nay saying, but as a legitamite criticism of this theory. Most intense forest fires get up to 900c, aluminum melts at 660c, and those pools look like aluminum from my experience... At least the 2nd pic does, I would assume the 1st as well. Cars aren't made with steel frames anymore, they have aluminum chassis designed to take a hit. Look, I'll entertain the idea of directed energy weapons on 9/11, that pic of the cops car and taxis is questionable since there wasn't a fire near those vehicles, as far as I know. But this theory is a trap and easily explained. Sorry to sounds like a nay sayer, but I don't like chasing BS theories to drive YT views.

No worries, and don't ever feel like you shouldn't ask. I've asked a ridiculous amount of questions to subs that won't even allow them anymore... who know, maybe because of me. I honestly think there should be an easy answer to a simple question, so why not ask it. And fuck anyone who tries to make you think otherwise.

Glass melts at approximately 1400-1600c, so how do you explain glass melting if the fires weren't reaching inordinate temperatures?

In addition, what kind of forest fire doesn't burn trees but leaves houses completely incinerated? Normal house fires leave homes charred but the structure remains. This fire destroyed homes entirely.

Do you have examples of the glass melting? Maybe the temp increase quick enough to break it. I guess every time a house is burnt, car is torched and trees are standing (like the pic in this article) it must have been a directed energy weapon. I'm sure I can find a lot more examples once I back at my comp.

Sure, just look at the cars pictured in the OP. All of their glass windows are gone.

Why is the non-existence of glass proof that it melted? It's more likely that the glass shattered way before melting.

Forest fires leaves behind charred wood, not ash white crematorium remains that would fill an urn. Whatever it was, normal fire it was not.

If you will contrast and compare the Canada Fires - Spring of 2016 they're incredibly similar. If wooden fences and rubber trash bins don't melt under those conditions then I don't know.

Also, I saw images in Cali where the grass burnt in magical lines...

i would say canadas fires were way more severe and 2016 doesn't have shit on the past 2 decades, i remember going up to the caribou and half of the drive all you could see was burned sticks (from far away they look like burned sticks sticking out of the ground) this was in bc, and was when i was a kid. it was one of the biggest forest fires in canadian history i think

I am curious about these fires and it does make me scratch my head. I did fire damage clean up in Santa Barbara during the two fires around 2008. What I did notice then was that, yes, houses and cars would be burned to a crisp and many times plants and trees near by still left green and untouched. So I don't find that point particularly sketchy. But it did seem that the 2008 fires did have obvious enough paths of destruction for the most part, but it the Montecito hills the winds can change directions very suddenly and the fire paths could take some unpredictable routes that seemed very surprising. But with these fires atm, it seems people are explaining that a lot of times there were no obvious paths the fires took, and some houses would get burned and some wouldn't. So to me, that would be the most curious part and not necessarily pointing out the trees would be left green next to an inferno. I can't explain it myself but I saw that enough that I just chalked it up to the mysteries of mother nature.

Agreed! Thanks for bringing up the topic.

No... but local TV said it might have something to do with a major riot on Nov 4th.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQQE6Cy0lYGNpbEVolO2MgN3P8iOVK-UpLsQ6qsU99lVmrz02srkQ

Pulled it from Google images, found it interesting because was watching a YouTube vid last night where a couple people explained something similar.

What I don't get is how it is inconceivable to a large portion or Americans and the MSM that these fires aren't started intentionally as false flag events or domestic eco terrorism...

i'm not saying this is solid evidence of anything, but i live in the rural hills of california, and last year we had a major fire that burnt a significant number of homes, which is nothing out of the ordinary here in fire country, but the day before the fire started my buddy and i walked by the fire station and there was three homeland security suvs and men dressed in both military attire and hasmat suits. and afterwords there were numerous contradicting statements on what started the fires.

It's just God with a big magnifying glass