Tucker Carlson is a media talking head shill, who is no more trustworthy than any other MSM pundit. They don't let people say shit like he did, unless there is a REASON for it. Whats the reason?
17 2017-10-26 by jeff34sonairplanr
Tucker Carlson is still a shill in my book. You don't get to be on the fucking mainstream media and have your own segment unless you agree to not "go there" unless instructed to do so...
My guess is they are doing this to try and get conspiracy theorists to lend your trust to the "right" side of the left/right paradigm; Nobody else thinks its weird that CNN is always bashed here but Fox news segments make the front page?
There has been an anti hillary clinton post every single day since the election, yet very few calling out Trump's bullshit..
And Alex Jones, the so called "Alternative Media" leader, has turned into a blatant "pro Conservative-pro Trump-Anti CNN-Trump and Republicans-can-do-no-wrong" lap dog? TPTB Are trying to merge and push the conspiracy theorists to the conservative side of the paradigm, they are duping you all and sucking you into trusting that side of the spectrum with moves like this Tucker Carlson thing. Trump's goofy ass tweets about "I will release the JFK files"..The dude is an undercover puppet. This is the new "angle" the elites are going with. They want to make you think that the current government is actually on your side this time.
And by doing this, they pit the conspiracy theorists against the REST of the people who largely lean "left" on the spectrum. And we are ripe for a civil war. Please, don't fall intro the trap, and don't make yourself look dumb. We should be calling this out everywhere.
This seems kind of biased..
40 comments
1 HepAuSesthefJOrd 2017-10-26
The revolution will not be televised.
1 heresmything 2017-10-26
No one is stopping the left from seizing this issue.
1 lolix123 2017-10-26
You clearly don't have an agenda /s
Everything you post is anti trump on your stupid account and tucker Carlson literally asked key questions that we have on national television, how does that make him a shill, he has his views and you have your own.
Why don't you call out Rachel Maddow for doing fuck all investigative journalism.
Your bias is obvious, he literally cracked open questions on a. Crucial conspiracy
1 jeff34sonairplanr 2017-10-26
And you broke like rule 1 of the conspiracy handbook; Trusting something from a mainstream media outlet, even if it seems to vindicate your stance.
1 lolix123 2017-10-26
That's not a rule, that's some stupid crap you made up.
and if we were to go off that methodology then you break that rule for regurgitating the same Babur the media spews...
Also he asked the same questions I was asking, so I have to change my viewpoint because the medias asking it.
To add to that hes literally the only one on the big companies asking questions so far, so if anything he's going against the MSM.
1 jeff34sonairplanr 2017-10-26
Here's an analogy...
There's a war between you and some other guys..
One of the other guys comes over and talks about how bad and mean his side is and how he wants to join yours. However, his buddies are using him as bait for some sort of trap.
That's what tucker Carlson is. He's a fucking tv shill. We will see if this guys career goes downhill after this, like what happened to REAL journalists like Ben Swann after he exposed pedogate last year. Carlson is a fake patriot/journalist just like Alex jones...wake up
1 lolix123 2017-10-26
You can't debate for shit kid, I know your a stupid troll based off your posts. You didn't challenge anything in my post and this only reveals your hypocrisy.
Carlson is asking the questions I'm asking and I have similar views to him, why are you trying to command what I think, it won't work, especially from a moron such as yourself
1 jeff34sonairplanr 2017-10-26
In not trying to command what you think, I'm proposing the less popular alternative truth to what everyone in this sub seems to believe right now.
Keep hanging on tucker carlson's and Fox News' nuts though..
1 lolix123 2017-10-26
Less popular? Your following cnn's narrative. You and your faggot father that raised a pussy hat wearing coward probably jerk off while watching cnn
Pathetic loser, don't insult me.
1 davetides 2017-10-26
I appreciate your proposal and I've promptly deposited it in the trash.
1 ThankYouVeryMuch2017 2017-10-26
You smell like farts.
1 jeff34sonairplanr 2017-10-26
Must have hit a nerve with the truth...
1 JopoleonStalinparte 2017-10-26
They're all shills. They're all dark side. This isn't anything new.
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2017-10-26
We can pick and choose the discussions we support and hold him accountable for... Just because you support or disagree doesn't mean You're in a life long forced support relationship.
1 invictus_excelsis 2017-10-26
What's up with 'YOU conspiracy theorists'? Seems odd.
1 MsRoyal 2017-10-26
Personally, I took it to mean participants in this sub. I'm fairly new to it & have been surprised at how overtly right leaning it is.
1 invictus_excelsis 2017-10-26
Describe 'right'.
1 MsRoyal 2017-10-26
In context of that particular statement I used 'right leaning' as a general term to mean Republican leaning. The posts/comments I've encountered so far have been skewed toward a pretty pro-Trump stance. Just an observation, like I said, I'm new to this sub.
1 invictus_excelsis 2017-10-26
"Describe 'right leaning' in your own words.".
1 jeff34sonairplanr 2017-10-26
No. Don't do what he asks you to do. He's just trying to get you to expand and talk and clutter the comments...
He knows what you mean. They're trying to convert us all to become conservatives here...
Theorists HATE both sides of the spectrum because we realize it's a huge scam to create division and make it easier for the elite to conquer us.
1 Gump_Worsley_III 2017-10-26
I think if you didn't buy into any ideology it would be harder to conquer a person, I don't buy into one ideology that pits you against another.
1 kloular 2017-10-26
So, no one should trust MSM right? Yet, here you are buying every word this guy is selling because it fits your idea. Just because he SAYS Campos went to Mexico doesn't mean it is true. You don't even know if the document he has is real. Sheep.
1 MsRoyal 2017-10-26
Can I ask what the purpose of repeating your question is? Specifically in response to the answer I gave? I don't mean to be rude but, you clearly understand my answer & it's worded so as to imply that you're expecting/hoping for a 'parroted' response with which to argue. I was really just noting an observation, not judging. I subbed because I have an interest in the subject matter.
1 td_watch 2017-10-26
I have been wondering what it was going to look like as people went through the stages of grief after they realized their narrative was a lie and their world view is dying. Now I know.
1 HillaryGodhamClinton 2017-10-26
it's going to get really, really bizarre.
1 no1113 2017-10-26
Limited hangout pied piperism.
1 MrMarmot 2017-10-26
It's time for us to admit to ourselves that the posts pushed to the top of "Hot" are pushed by largely people who aren't serving the best interests of this sub, but to distract and detract from it.
1 jeff34sonairplanr 2017-10-26
Exactly
1 menotconvinced 2017-10-26
it's horrible how infiltrated this sub is.
1 throwawaymnmnmn 2017-10-26
comedy central now has a show that is devoted to conspiracy like information
I think the counter culture is now been fully taken over...
1 conacct 2017-10-26
The bow tie, don't lie.
1 HillaryGodhamClinton 2017-10-26
Yeah, you're still not getting it.
1 irwin_normal 2017-10-26
Spot on Jeff. That 'tucker' fellow is bs.
Fox is just making money... Appealing to the 'loons'
1 jeff34sonairplanr 2017-10-26
Thanks mate
1 Gump_Worsley_III 2017-10-26
I actually think Tucker is the one of the more sane people in the MSM, the questions he asked were legitimate and should be the same questions everyone asks.
1 jeff34sonairplanr 2017-10-26
You're talking about MSM pundits as if there is a difference between them. They were "selected" for those roles for a reason. Their ability to verbally manipulate the masses in a coherent manner. That's all there is to it. They own ALL of the media and they make sure there are no loose ends. Especially on a major network like Fox News...
1 Gump_Worsley_III 2017-10-26
Yes I understand that, I was only saying that he's more of less one of the most rational sounding pundits. I find that some of the more liberal media outlets are more prone to histrionics. I know they are all part and parcel of the very same fabric.
1 Gump_Worsley_III 2017-10-26
Also the questions he asks are legitimate there is no political bias in seeking the truth.
1 dogrescuersometimes 2017-10-26
When the masses confront conspiracy talk they will dismiss good theories because Carlson vetted the conspiracies and nothing came of it case closed stop asking questions.
1 kloular 2017-10-26
So, no one should trust MSM right? Yet, here you are buying every word this guy is selling because it fits your idea. Just because he SAYS Campos went to Mexico doesn't mean it is true. You don't even know if the document he has is real. Sheep.
1 ky420 2017-10-26
I think the reason most of it is anti Hillary is because anything trump has done pales in comparison to her abhorrent greed, manipulation and corruption of the political and media systems.
1 haddyzz 2017-10-26
I was thinking the same thing... I think they want people debating about this and arguing about it as much as they can- I think they themselves are driving the whole 1 vs multiple shooter narrative as well. what do they gain from this? I dont know... does it make it more effective a psy op the longer it stays relevant?
Pretty sure crisis actors (like the dr phill chick) were hired to say there were multiple shooters
1 IanPhlegming 2017-10-26
There is obviously something to this, just not sure how much, but I suspect a lot.
Still, taking into account that MAYBE there's been a counter-coup, Carlson could be a puppet but for a slightly less evil group.
1 Gump_Worsley_III 2017-10-26
Also the questions he asks are legitimate there is no political bias in seeking the truth.