Reminder that the Clinton Foundation is one of the most highly rated charities on the planet, while the Donald Trump used the Trump Foundation to buy multiple paintings of himself and pay legal settlements.
0 2017-10-28 by Pineapple__Jews
0 2017-10-28 by Pineapple__Jews
37 comments
1 mconeone 2017-10-28
The Clinton foundation is corrupt as fuck.
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-10-28
How's the Trump Foundation?
1 Mecanatron 2017-10-28
Probably as corrupt or more but fuck man, the Clintons are sewer slime.
Bill fucked Haiti as pres and the foundation fucked them again.
1 ENDLESSBLOCKADEZ 2017-10-28
But what about drumpppfffff!!!!!!
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-10-28
You realize four stars is a good thing right?
1 Mecanatron 2017-10-28
Not when it's a meaningless award
1 mods_are_abc_agents 2017-10-28
I give you zero stars
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-10-28
Facts suck sometimes. :(
1 andywarhaul 2017-10-28
You're premise is that the Clinton Foundation "is a highly rated charity". When it's been proven that it's essential a slush fund and a money laundering outlet as well as a route for bribery. And you know what Trump does the same thing. Guess what? They are all on the same god forsaken team. When you accept that none of them are looking out for you and that you need to start thinking for yourself you'll be on the right track.
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-10-28
Yup. A highly respected charity rater gave them a perfect score.
Wait a second...do you think Hillary had threatened to kill them if they didn't?!?!? My God...
1 andywarhaul 2017-10-28
You shouldn't trust a charity rater. That's like trust JD Power awards. Those ratings are not a reflection of any sort of investigation or inspection of the financials of the charity. How do we know this? Because there are several senate committees that would like access to the financials and they can't get access. Case in point
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=8881
Aga Khan Foundation is one of the biggest proponents of microfinance in the world. Micro finance has been denounced as an evil parasitic tactic to trap people into "debt bondage". Do some research on it and you'll be surprised. And yet they have a four star rating as well. Please try and look at things from a neutral perspective. You'll be much more effective at communicating your ideas.
1 Apersonofinterest666 2017-10-28
Remember when all of the credit agencies were assigning 4 diamond ratings to mortgage derivatives when they were in fact shit?
1 MaestroBelarious 2017-10-28
Partisan. Get with the program
1 Mecanatron 2017-10-28
Haiti <3 Clintons
1 rimper 2017-10-28
That makes Hillary losing to Trump, even funnier.
1 BrotherPancake 2017-10-28
lol charity
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/24/not-a-joke-satirist-nails-the-clinton-foundation-in-35-scathing-tweets/
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-10-28
Fun fact: Alan Smithee is pseudonym used by directors who want to disown themselves from a film.
For the love of God please tell me you were being sarcastic?
1 BrotherPancake 2017-10-28
Not being sarcastic at all, "Pineapple__Jews." Smithee (RIP) was one of the top legal minds I've known. And I know a lot of top legal minds.
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-10-28
So you are aware that is a satire account?
1 schraeds 2017-10-28
Are you aware you're a satire account?
1 BrotherPancake 2017-10-28
It's not a satire account, and everything written in that post is verifiable. Look. It. Up. But keep attacking the source, I'm sure it'll take you far in life.
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-10-28
How about sharing real sources?
1 BrotherPancake 2017-10-28
Nah, I've got better things to do than argue with a mentally ill troll.
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-10-28
Well in the future when you do give sources can I recommend not using joke Twitter accounts?
1 invictus_excelsis 2017-10-28
Is this satire?
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-10-28
Nope. Highly respected independent charity watch group.
1 MaestroBelarious 2017-10-28
So the charity pays you? You're Shilling?
1 mastigia 2017-10-28
You misspelled propaganda.
1 rednaxela86 2017-10-28
One charity watchdog, Charity Navigator, no longer rates the foundation because its “atypical business model can not be accurately captured in our current rating methodology,” according to the organization. “Our removal of The Clinton Foundation from our site is neither a condemnation nor an endorsement of this charity,” they write. In essence, the various, wide-ranging projects and federated nature of the organization didn’t properly mesh with Charity Navigator’s ranking methods.
http://fortune.com/2016/08/27/clinton-foundation-health-work/
I guess they removed the rating and re-added it?
1 BallP 2017-10-28
Just a reminder of what an NPR host said after moderating their last Haiti conference:
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dailycaller.com/2016/08/26/clinton-global-initiative-moderator-describes-groups-events-as-creepy-disgusting-gross-audio/
1 Shillin4Shekles 2017-10-28
LOL so how much did they pay the ratings agency?
1 IanPhlegming 2017-10-28
Anybody can pay off anybody to get a highly rated award. I'm sure Trump's Foundation is a self-serving clown show. The Clinton Foundation has ton more blood on its hands, however.
1 mastigia 2017-10-28
You didn't stop for a single second to wonder at how a foundation run by a crime family is a top rated charity? Like, this didn't set off any alarm bells at all.
Roflmao
1 Pineapple__Jews 2017-10-28
What crimes?
1 dannyboy000 2017-10-28
I thought the Clinton Foundation was just where they wash their bribes from dozens of "doners" who they happened to help out while in power.
I absolutely is.
1 dannyboy000 2017-10-28
This charity rating website is probably made and owned by a Clinton Foundation law firm.
1 CULTURAL_MARXISM_SUX 2017-10-28
Highly rated by whom? Organ traffickers and pedophiles?