Is shit hitting the fan? I hope so in a good way

Interesting.

Yes, I heard that, too...

Something strange is going on here.

Jared Kushner is off on Saudi Arabia to scheme against humanity and Q hinted that he’s there for pedo stuff...

What does this mean and where is this cited?

Is this insinuating Kushner is a Pedo?

Say whaaaaaa? No flippin way. That’s sick. Trump would NEVER have that around him or his daughter. Period.

I too can make baseless accusations and provide 0 evidence.

Then why did he let him marry his daughter, have kids, convert her to Judaism

Every dad has their favorite daughter marry a man that’s evil

Like 10 years of his daughter being married to a Jew and raising his Jewish children- long con!

Kushner?

Why would trump let his daughter be married to and have kids with a deep state mole!

He has an office in the White House, trump just had dinner with them tonight for Ivanka birthday

Cause the Illuminati wanted to start controlling trump over 15 years ago by having his daughter marry a Jewish guy so that one day in the future trump might win a very lucky election

Yup, makes total sense

If they are that good why don’t they just give all their friends the god damn lotto numbers!

strategic alliance?

this is a larp meant to obfuscate I think— Created by someone with a formerly high clearance.

I don’t fully follow you on this- who mad the obfuscation

u mad, bro?

Go home, your drunk

I am home honey.

Message lightbringerflex, I am sure he is down to dock

Don't forget Trump was on the Epstein plane too. He's not exactly who you think he is

He was alleged to ride that plane but is not on any flight logs just so you know.

Trump doesn't appear in the flight logs actually.

However, he does appear as a contact with multiple numbers in Epstein's little black book.

No hes saying Kush is there draining swamp

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/29/politics/kushner-saudi-arabia-trip/index.html

He was meeting with the new king who is pro Israel

It’s been part of an over arching plan that SA will recognize Israel and normalize relations in 2018 before they announce the new two state solution- the new king is likely to be the moderator for the new peace talks

All of the kings of SA have been pro-Israel.

Except the previous one? Who literally helped create the PLO and gave them hundreds of billions of dollars.

Yup, you have it all figured out

Sure buddy

They are doing a pretty good job of that, what with the whole Mecca being there thing

Yup, the are in double secret probation as Jews

Huma is in SA now too

Are you kidding!? WTH?

Why did you say Podestas? Only Tony is in possible hot water due to working with Manafort.

It wouldn't be that surprising to any of us if they were both dirty but you're right that Tony is looking like the brother they are going after but by just saying "Podesta" it makes everyone think of the more well known Podesta brother (John Podesta).

I just wish they would stop doing that soon. It muddies the issue and doesn't help anyone but those pushing partisan crap.

It's just to make the LARP sound more legitimate to more people they use as many vague terms as possible like the part that says "a fake news anchor will cancel their show tonight". Almost vague enough to become selffulfilling.

I think it's a larp.

Really depends on when whatever they've indicted Tony for actually happened and how much it may have to do with John who worked for Bill Clinton's administration and the first term of Obama's happened to know about it at the time. The two were constantly in touch with one another as we know from the Pizzagate emails that were filled with what were recognised "pedo terms".

Who knows what's liable to come out when they start crawling all over Tony's activities and transactions and verifying what they were all about or what the NSA has when they run his name through the compiler that has as much on his every move socked away as it does on any of the rest of us?

I just did a quick search of aviation groups no mention of an intercept happening nor special restrictions that an interception would have caused.

No more reason to believe that than to believe a larper with a history of 98% misses.

what 2% was correct?

Good question, I was just preemptively shielding myself from any vauge proclamations where he loosely and generously came close.

still havent seen that yet either?

also glad to see I get downvoted yet noone will provide a single time the person was correct.

I'm pretty sure you're fuckin up some of these folks suspension of disbelief. It would explain the downvotes. Have an upvote on me for fighting the good fight.

Fuckin outstanding comment. Totally underrated. Literally lol'd a bit and I never use that acronym lightly. Can't believe u r getting downvotes...yes...I can. Have an upvote, sry I'm late.

Fbi anon back in feb 2016 was pretty accurate about hillary.

Downed? Even your source doesn't say anything about the military shooting down an aircraft.

It is always publicized. Any time there is a military intercept in US Airspace it is a big deal as it causes issues for civilian aircraft in the area, ATC has reroute aircraft away from the active military area,

You dont understand, its publicized because they cant hide it. ATC would know because they have to route aircraft away from the military. The military would radio the aircraft on channels anyone can listen in on. Anyone near a military base or airport would see a civilian jet escorted by fighters. It is not something you can just hide.

Yes. They are. Just like thousands are listening to police scanners.

Yes, www.flightaware.com is one of the many just for tracking flights. Any civilian aircraft or person on the ground with a radio in range could hear the military talking to the civilian aircraft. Heck some scanners are even online like https://www.liveatc.net

Civilian Aircraft and F-15/16s (which are what we use for intercepts) dont have exotic tech to get around detectors.

Good lord, the story just keeps evolving say you don't have to say "maybe I am wrong".

What? Is the DoD just handing out F-22s and F-35s to civilians wanted by the law? The thing you posted said aircraft. If they had super secret tech how did they get intercepted? This story you keep stretching has holes so large a barge can float through.

high level politicians have a lot of unknown secretive travel methods with technologies we haven’t heard of

BUt... the POTUS flies around on a big ass plane with military escort... not an invisible jet that just teleports there. Why doesnt he get the good shit?

I can also track santa on norad. How do you know if yheat software is nothing more than a video game. You have to use some healthy skeptism and common sense. Don't put so much trust in the software that has such public access.

Right because a civilian aircraft suddenly turning off its transponder wouldn't be noticed by EVERYONE!

If they really wanted to keep something quiet - You're telling me they WOULDN'T use F-22's?

Yes, because they are watched by everyone. They are strategic assets. When they move people notice.

Who notices? Military? Who are under orders to not say a word?

Plane watchers, foreign governments, civilian pilots in the area, ect.

airliners.net for example. People are watching military and civilian airports everywhere.

We do have this new thing called an aircraft carrier, you do know that, right?

So which is it a super stealth aircraft or a naval fighter? The story cant just keep evolving because you have to have it work. And how did the disappearance of a civilian aircraft just not get noticed when it didnt land overseas like it was schedualed to do?

You really seem sure of what you are saying.

You really seem sure that under no circumstances could a plane get into the sky without someone seeing it.

You really seem sure that under no circumstances could a plane get into the air without a flight plan and/or scheduled landing point.

You really seem sure that under no circumstances could a plane get into the air without interacting with air traffic control.

I realize that all of these are definitely possible, because none of the above has any effect on the laws of physics which allow a plane to fly. The only things a plane needs to fly is: A pilot, fuel, a functional engine, and a stable airframe.

My point is it would be REALLY hard to hide it. For an event that has already happened anon is being really freaking cagey about it.

Oh come on, the government is very good at keeping secrets, just look how long the deep state was not publicly known. Trying to make it sound like a jet cannot be intercepted quietly can be as simple as threatening them over the radio to change their flight pattern and return or else. Things happen all the time that does not follow regular protocals.

And the military jet would have to broadcast over radio channels ANYONE with a receiver could hear them on.

Is that true for private jets as well?

Yes, it will affect all air traffic not involved in the incident.

It’s not Public because because it never happened

Stop larping

So other planes in the area wouldn't crash into them

In answer to the who what where on the aircraft authorized to fly during grounding: FBI authorized Saudi royalty to fly out of Vegas and Providence.

nytimes.com/2005/03/27/washington/world/the-reach-of-war-arranged-departures-new-details-on-fbi.html

Also I remember a SA plane was allowed to fly on 911 after all other planes had been grounded. Seems to be a running theme.

I have to be honest: of all the 4chan screenshots that have been posted here, this one is maybe the most obvious LARP of them all (which is really saying something). I'm a little surprised that so many people have latched onto it.

That said, remember this: this guy said that Podesta was getting indicted 11/3 (which has come and gone), and Huma was getting indicted 11/6. Giving him some latitude for unexpected events, if neither has gone down by 11/13, I'd really like to hope this sub will stop giving him oxygen.

https://twitter.com/jbro_1776/status/926597811063357441

You sure he was wrong? He said Podesta would be indicted on 11/3, the information would get out on 11/4, and Huma on 11/6.

Well, we'll see shortly, won't we? I'd love to be wrong.

Actionable on the 4th so you either didn't read the anon post or reading comprehension is shit. Why do people keep repeating this shit. And honestly this is one of the best LARPs posted here on r/conspiracy.

Huma is CIA/Mossad.

huma hillary's right hand? no she is part of MB her family is anyways wth is going on?

MB & Isis organized and financed by those same two intelligence agencies.

Remember when someanon said that Hillary was making a run for it and was going to be arrested on the tarmac?

Uh huh.

Fool me once...

We still have no clue what happened to Tupac & Biggie either. Are they in on this gig too?

LARP!

If all this stuff is true (which I hope it is) I'm a bit concerned with the fact Trump is supposedly not going after former presidents (concerned with 'sanctity' of office).

I would bet that will specifically have to do with how much and how blatant the evidence is that they have against said former presidents.

Have you guys seen the video where huma gets the news about the charges for Weiner. Clearly a mad but not surprised reaction

Does anyone have a link?

This Q Clearance person is only a little above beginner level. He or she has a long way to go before being able to successfully pretend to be an insider.

Check Twitter for updates on "Q Anon". It's happening! Who is John Q. Public Anon?

i looked up who owes top floors of Mandalay bay it is a co. owned by bill gates and a SA prince who is being held in SA for corruption

Say whaaaaaa? No flippin way. That’s sick. Trump would NEVER have that around him or his daughter. Period.

Good question, I was just preemptively shielding myself from any vauge proclamations where he loosely and generously came close.

Fbi anon back in feb 2016 was pretty accurate about hillary.

strategic alliance?

this is a larp meant to obfuscate I think— Created by someone with a formerly high clearance.