I get that. Its like Alex Jones getting people interested in conspiracy and the deep state....even though hes a disinfo agent,to the laymen, he seems legit...at first.
You are dilusional. Bill nye got an entire generation into science. His goal was to teach people. Just because he sold out now doesnt mean he's an Alex Jones. Alex jones wants to sell products with fear not teach people
Bill sold out a long long time before "now". He has pushed the deep states pseudo science religion for decades. 99% of his degrees are recent and honorary. I think the only legit degree, if you can even call it that, was his BS in mechanical engineering. He is a failed comedian/actor who sold his sole to be a talking head on TV...nothing more....
He indoctrinates young impressionable minds with false pseudoscientific doctrines like Heliocentrism, theoretical physics and multigenderism. As well as Institutional totalitarianism.
when there is no proof of what you say? Sounds hypocritical
There is proof of what I say. That's the point....
Bill and other tools like him, along with useful idiots, ignore and actively suppress actual proof obtained via experimentation in physical reality and replace it with theoretical nonsensical pseudoscientific dogma that completely ignores the scientific method. When they are called out with said proof, they mock, divert, attack, quote their theoretical mathematical dogma and assert their false "scientific authority"...but never produce results from objective real world experimentation.
You are using a lot of big words. It almost looks like you are copy pasting this rhetoric from some script. I'm done talking about Bill. We agree to disagree on his ideals. What I do want is your proof of the earth being flat. Because I can proove the diameter of the earth with math and measuring the angle of the sun from different points on the globe. Where is your proof? I want the reason you think the earth is flat? Reasons and evidence not your copy past rhetoric please
I'm not copying and pasting anything...I just have the ability to use the brain God gave me before I type. And since I have had this type of conversation many times before, its a topic I am versed in.
First off when i say "flat" its not to say that there aren't mountains and valleys slopes and levels. Its to say its not a globe. The proof is found in the results of real world experimentation. While math is used to calculate the shape of the globe earth in theory, the same math does not coincide with results of real world experimentation.
In other words, I could ask the question, "If the earth was a globe 25k miles in circumference( or a globe of any size), what would be the rate of curvature?" and I could use math to answer that question accurately. But that in of itself does not prove that the earth is a globe 25k miles in circumference( or any size). You still need to apply that math to physical reality via experimentation to obtain proof.
The "scientific" establishment ignores the real world experimentation step because it does not produce the results that they want. And because said experimentation does not produce said result, the earth therefore is NOT a globe 25k miles in circumference (or any size).
Basically its the math used to calculate the curvature...and its telling us, "between any two points on a globe with a circumference that TPTB give us, this is how many inches of the globe will impede line of sight.". So at one mile you will lose ~8 inches, at 2 miles you will lose ~32 inches, 3 miles you will lose ~72, so on and so forth.
To conduct the experiment you will need unobstructed line of sight between two points ( western united states will make this easier due to lower population density, but you can still do it in the eastern US...many have used the ocean or great lakes) at roughly the same elevation ( keep track of elevation at both points to account for it) Favorable atmospheric conditions ( meaning a clear day where atmosphere isn't impeding line of sight ) and an adequate zoom lens, telescope or binoculars. ( the human eye has its limitations ).
Probably the easiest thing to do would have 2 6ft or shorter friends stand 3 miles apart and look for each other across the distance. If they can see each other, they have proven that the curvature does not exist because at that distance their line of sight would be blocked by roughly 6 feet of earth if in fact it was a globe with a circumference that TPTB give us. Remember to account for elevation and atmospheric conditions.
FTR, people have tested this at much greater distances.
Whenever I have this conversation I always link this video because I think it is the best summary available, which include examples of above mentioned experiments. There might be one or two points that I am on the fence about, or flat out don't agree with, but to be honest, I have not watched it in some time so don't quote me on that. Regardless, if only the above mentioned experiment is correct, then that's all the proof one would need to at least show that earth is not a globe....I'm just mentioning this because the video goes into more than just the shape of the earth. And to be clear, I don't recommend the video to promote the narrator. I just think its the best summary in an ocean of information and disinformation. I can also link other material as well if you are serious about the topic.
So how do satellites orbit the flat disk? Are satellites a myth? You know people live in space right? What benefit does anyone have if the earth is round? Why lie about the shape? Why isnt it square. Are the planets flat too? Is the moon flat? You know we can see planets and moons right? Have you ever seen a ball? You are trying to tell me spacex is fake? You know they can land rockets? You facinate me. No wonder trump is president
Sorry about the delay....had to step away fro a while.
So how do satellites orbit the flat disk? Are satellites a myth?
When speaking in terms of man made orbital satellites such as these, which humorously enough, were first conjured up by a science fiction writer, yes they are a myth.( im going to refer to them as SATS from here on out.) SATS would not be needed on either a globe or a flat earth. Ground based devices could and do establish communication networks that TBTB claim SATS establish. I could go into a bit more detail about this, and will if you would like, but for now I will just conclude by saying that, while I'm sure there are things such as drones and balloons used for temporary networks for multiple reasons, at MUCH lower altitudes than what pseudos claim for SATS, what we are told about SATS is wildly nonsensical and impractical, and in some cases physically impossible.
You know people live in space right?
Well technically everyone lives in space, as all matter occupies space. But I'm confident you meant astronauts live in outer space on the ISS. This is a well established falsehood. There is ample evidence to prove that NASA is little more than a "hollywood production entity" ( see the 200 proofs video for more on this) that creates fabrications to fool the masses. And tbh, their productions are becoming harder to spot due to advances in technology such as Augmented VR. But they have been spotted and will continue to be spotted by those who understand the truth.
Why lie about the shape?
Motive will almost always be left to speculation, but IMO, the PRIMARY motive is to establish doubt about God's existence and creations into the masses. As well as control and financial reasons. Funding for "space" programs have generated billions of dollars in revenue over the years via taxation, and TPTB want to be God.
Why isn't it square?
Why isn't your face a square? Its just not the way God made it.
Are the planets flat too? is the moon flat?
To me, it doesn't always appear so, but regardless, the shape of the planets and or the moon, or what some will refer to as "wandering stars", does not have any bearing on the shape earth because they are all independent from the earth. A room full of monkey's does not make me a monkey simply because I am in the same room as them.
Have you ever seen a ball?
I sure have.
You know we can see planets and moons right?
I acknowledge that we see something up there, but people in general just accept what they have been told about them, as opposed to using the scientific method to know for themselves. This is because the ability to use said method to gain knowledge is virtually impossible. TBTB on the other hand lie and tell us that they have the ability to do so, so we should just take their word for it.
You are trying to tell me spacex is fake?
SpaceX and other "private companies" are TPTB answer to people waking up to the NASA deceptions. SpaceX and similar companies receive shit tons of funding from governments via subsidies. They are a civilian agency in name only and participate in the same deceptions and productions as NASA does. So yeah, they are fake in all the was that matter.
You know they can land rockets?
No one is arguing that rockets exist or that they are used. The argument is about how and where they are used.
You facinate me. No wonder trump is president
I didn't vote for trump and if you want to start slinging tongue in cheek insults, you can find someone else to answer your questions. I have been respectful, and ask that you reciprocate said respect.
I will conclude this by saying that like most globers, you tend to aim your attention and questions to the matters of space above us, when you should be starting your journey of discovery closer to home. Start with the curvature experiment and work your way up. Crawl before you walk, connect the dots along the way and the truth will become apparent.
Ok, thanks for answering all of my questions. Where is your proof tho? Where is the edge? If its flat there is an edge right? Finding proof of the edge seems a lot easier than faking entire industries. My career uses the curvature of the earth for a lot of things. If the earth was flat we would be able to use one coordinate syestm for the entire earth. Since it is a ball we cannot use a flat plane. I do transformations on coordinate systems every day. Do you know what that is?
The proof come from results of experimentation conducted in our physical reality. Thought we already covered this.
If its flat there is an edge right? Where is the edge?
Well, this is a topic still being debated, even within the flat earth community. Primarily because of limitations in the ability of man to traverse the distances and withstand the elements required to conduct experiments. Not to mention the active suppression of information spoken of in my previous comments and restrictions to travel which have been applied using military forces.
This[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/Flat_earth.jpg] is generally accepted as a map of our "flat" earth. Where the north pole is in the center and Antarctica is actually an ice wall making up a perimeter around it, as opposed to globe earth where Antarctica is a land mass on the "south pole" of the globe. So no "edge" to fall off of.
Some have theorized that the "ice wall" expands to infinity, as illustrated here, or that our physical plain of existence expands to infinity and there are multiple "habitats" on said plain, as illustrated here. But most are in agreement that said habitat or habitats are enclosed in a transparent, or ever so slightly opaque, dome of some kind, as illustrated here Some more still have theorized that there is actually liquid or a dense gas on the other side of said dome as illustrated here..an "Aether" if you will, and that the stars and planets are actually traveling through it, using it as a medium in which to travel. This last part could even be considered to be proven correct already, as explained here. But I need to do more study on it to come to a conclusion.
Again, it's extremely difficult to conduct experiments to know the answers to some question for sure because of distance and the elements involved. A lot of these theories have been constructed from known truths, ancient myths,ancient texts, "religious" texts and observations from a distance.
SOmethign worth asking yourself though...Is it just by chance, as scientism would assert, that we as humans have the perfect habitat to thrive in? And at the same time, we have natural barriers from going to far in any one direction? We go to far up and we lose our air to breath and atmospheric pressure and matter as a medium to travel. We go to close or too far from the north pole( the center of flat earth) and we encounter extreme cold. We go too far down below the surface and we encounter extreme heat or too far down in the ocean and encounter extreme pressure. But at the same time we have a vast area to explore and thrive in. Seems almost like a testing ground to me. An ant farm or rat maze, or observatory if you will.
Quick side note about going down and experiencing heat. Did you know that even though scientism claims to know how the inner workings of the globe earth works, down to the depths of its core...the deepest hole on record anyone has ever dug is less than 8 miles below the surface? It's an obvious assertion that scientism says they know what is going on for sure at approximately 500 times that depth...
My career uses the curvature of the earth for a lot of things. If the earth was flat we would be able to use one coordinate syestm for the entire earth. Since it is a ball we cannot use a flat plane.
It does't though, I'm sure you were taught that it does, and just accepted it instead of proving it for yourself (indoctrination). This is brought up in the 200 proofs video multiple times, and here is another video that gets into it. (its long as well)
Do you think the dinosaurs are a myth too?
I'll say maybe...probably even. Again, I haven't done experiments myself to come to a conclusion, but I think information given in this video is very plausible. Though I will not currently rule out genetic manipulation as a means for their past or even present existence. I am not as well versed on this topic, but i have spent some time on it.
I do transformations on coordinate systems every day. Do you know what that is?
Stop posting the 200 proofs video. There isnt 1 peice of evidence in it. Just words. Words are not evidence (see the scientific method) I want proof but obviously to you proof is 'belief' so this conversation is over
If you think this is fake you are dilusional. Where is the ice wall? Where is the edge? At this altitude we shpuld be able to see more than 12% of the earth if it was flat right?
https://youtu.be/mjtX7bthWao
If you cant see the use of a fish eye lens and scene transitioning (video edits) in that spaceX video...i don't know what to tell you. And again...consider the source...
Stop posting the 200 proofs video. There isnt 1 piece of evidence in it.
There is though But I agree...video and pictures are one thing....seeing it for yourself is another...this is why i suggested that you should conduct the previously mentioned experiment yourself. And if you actually took the time to watch the 200 proofs video and tried to understand what was being said, you might just learn something.
Just words. Words are not evidence (see the scientific method)
LOL...I'm pretty sure this is the point I have been trying to get across to you throughout our conversation.....
I want proof but obviously to you proof is 'belief' so this conversation is over....
I don't know how I can say it any differently....proof is obtained by verifying theory via real world experimentation. You want proof? Look at the video I have provided where people are conducting the experiments...or again...go do it yourself.
And lets get something straight here bud...YOU came asking me questions...so anytime you want to stop asking them, that's fine with me. No one is forcing you to be here....
I see manipulations. They mixed lies with truth to confuse the viewer and to push their false narrative. If the earth was curved, and the lazer remained level, the lazer beam wouldn't have been higher, the earth, or in this case the water on the earth, would have been blocking the lazer beam...or to say, the beam would have had to travel through the water to reach its target. So what happened here is that someone by the lazer angled it up. You can actually see this at the 3:21 mark.
Like I said, TPTB actively try to suppress the truth, by any means available to them. But an objective mind will always discover their deceptions.
Multiple people have actually conducted this experiment without cheating and got the results one would expect if the earth was "flat". There is a lot of disinfo out there. And there were lot of "fair videos" that were readily available in the past on places like youtube that have since been removed and or buried...but I will look for some to share.
But again, you can conduct said experiment yourself with or without a lazer, and I would encourage you to do so. Remain objective and control the conditions of your experiment so that it remains honest and you will get the results I described.
And if you haven't already, watch that 200 proofs video. This particular point is discussed and experiments are shown.
Holy shit. Before reading all you've had to say, I never considered the fact that the earth was flat. I thought people were insane to believe such a thing. You have actually made me consider the possibility of a flat earth. Blew my mind.
As I have mentioned before, the sun moon and stars are separate from the earth. Their shape, whatever it truly is, does not dictate the shape of the earth. I am not a monkey simply because I am in the same room as a bunch of monkeys.
I acknowledge the phases of the moon, and won't pretend to know what is causing the phases, though i do have theories. But one can prove that the earth is not a globe, so I know that it's not the earths globe shape that is causing them.
Not sure what that whole monkey business is about...
The Earth is an oblate spheroid, not a globe. Basic calculations that work on perfect globes will not be accurate when attributed to Earth's surface.
The lunar eclipse is Earths shadow cast on the moon. Discarding inconvenient evidence because it doesn't fit a scenario is a red flag that you're being taken for a ride.
Not sure what that whole monkey business is about...
Its an analogy.... moon stars represent the monkeys, the earth represent the person, the room represents 3d space....do you need more to understand what is being said there?
The Earth is an oblate spheroid, not a globe. Basic calculations that work on perfect globes will not be accurate when attributed to Earth's surface.
lol...OK Neil DeGrasse Tyson... /s
See thats the thing, they will feed you some tripe like that and then feed you some tripe like this and just keep going back and forth back and forth....all the while you are just being spoon fed different flavors of shit....
Even if the earth was an "oblate spheroid", one would be able to measure for curvature. and you would still be able to see it while doing real world experimentation...even at modest distances....but YOU CANT....because its not there.
The lunar eclipse is Earths shadow cast on the moon. Discarding inconvenient evidence because it doesn't fit a scenario is a red flag that you're being taken for a ride.
Dude that is exactly what you and the majority of the population is doing...disregarding evidence because it doesn't fit your narrative....
Again....the moons phases are a separate issue than the shape of the earth. You only insist that its not because you believe that the earth casting a shadow causes them, because you believe that the world is a sphere...or as neil calls it, a spheroid....but that assertion can be disproved via real world experimentation.
Lived by the beach my whole life, when the hull of a ship dips below the horizon the effects are clearly visible.
The heliocentric model makes the most sense. You're welcome to disagree, but if you're not able to fit the pieces together any better then I don't think you're gonna win anyone over.
Apply a lens zoom in zoom out, things will appear and disappear.... curvature is not a factor., what you are experiencing is the vanishing point of your perspective.
The heliocentric model makes the most sense.
Actually it doesn't...if you would like to read what I have had to say about this topic, you can read a conversation I have been having with another user over the last few days. It starts here and continues here and plenty of resources are included to get anyone started.
You're welcome to disagree, but if you're not able to fit the pieces together any better then I don't think you're gonna win anyone over.
I disagree because the "flat" stationary earth can be proven via experimentation in physical reality. And I have apparently "fit the pieces together" adequately enough for at least one user in the last day to actually consider the possibility that the earth is "flat" and that the "globe" is false. As seen here. Its not like I am the only one who sees the truth. The debate on the shape of the earth has never stopped....it has only been suppressed and or mocked by TPTB and useful idiots. But thank God for the internet, because more and more people are gaining access to this type of information...
And its not about me "winning people over"...if you want to believe in a spinning globe earth, feel free to do so, but don't tell me that its a proven physical reality, because I can scientifically prove it to be a false reality. It's like all this tranny acceptance stuff being pushed... If you are a man who wants to dress up, take drugs, surgically alter your body to look like a woman, or vice versa...that's your choice...but don't tell me that you ARE a woman and expect me to agree with you...because you aren't...and no amount of theoretical math or assertions is going to make that a physical reality....
His show was the perfect blend of scientific facts, assumptions based on those facts, and completely erroneous or unprovable conclusions based on those assumptions which is essentially the same exact formula that the pseudo scientific religion follows as a whole.
It’s so effective, so pervasive, people fall for it and NEVER question anything anymore.
Well there are different levels of respect for a number of reasons. I think the number of people I do respect, in one way or another, far outnumber the people I don't. But then again, I have had little to no contact with most of the human population....so who knows?
Illuminating isn't it. Same basic concept most people have when it goes to most any conspiracy theory. They are happier not knowing or not believing. It is why most avoid such topics.
The video I think was about sexuality. Sex education is an invaluable tool to teach children about the reality of sex and sexual preference. I don't see anything wrong with the video. Bill Nye is not a pedophile. He's one of the good guys. I was taught about sex and genitalia when I was 14. She should have included STDs and pregnancy in the song but okay.
I haven't made any comments one way or the other, my comment was stating how certain information would rather not be known by most people as it could hinder their perception of the world. So, coolio that you perceive Bill Nye as a good guy. It isn't for me to say whether or not he is a pedophile I don't actually know. Nor have I inferred. The subject matter within the video was illuminating was it not?
Yeah it was cringe-worthy, but educational. And also, fleshlights. If I had kids I would totally buy them sex toys to masturbate with when they turn 14. I'd rather them masturbate than get knocked up or get an STD. I'm the kind of person that wants people to have knowledge. I don't care if it makes people feel uncomfortable. Better to be safe and aware than in the dark and repressed.
Wait until you have kids my dear. Perhaps your stance will change as they age. Perhaps not. I think it could be beneficial, but I don't think buying a flesh light for your teenage son will deter him from wanting to have sex. If there is a will there is a way. That is the basis for anything though. If you have the will to achieve something and that will isn't easily diminished than it is likely you will achieve that goal. Doesn't matter how long it takes if that is where all your energy is being spent you will achieve it.
Well I mean, I guess it's okay? As long as they use condoms, get tested, both CONSENSUAL, legal, and provided they are aware of the consequences then okay?
Purity is virtue. Saving one's self for love is beautiful. But, if people want to get it over with and explore that's also okay. I am all for expression and gettin one's freak on in a healthy, safe, CONSENSUAL way.
I forgot to add, I myself find impure people unattractive. I'm a bit of a prude. But I don't judge 'experienced' people and I wouldn't judge my kids if they want to be 'experienced'. I just personally find that not attractive at all.
Best you can do, is hope you install some moral values into your children and hope they continue growing and developing their own moral values. We can't control our off spring but we can hope to shape their awareness early on.
Just wanted to make one last comment in general. Sexuality is good and is necessary for healthy development. It is when sexual experiences are forced on someone that sex becomes bad. Teens should be able to touch themselves, explore their bodies and when they are ready, be in a committed relationship when they're older. They should be free to love women, men, both. Obviously there must be self control and safe sex is crucial, but sexuality is a beautiful and worthwhile thing to explore. It is who we are.
Felt exactly like the first time watching that 'performance;' w.t.f. However, this time, I couldn't get passed the line, "Are my options only hard or moist?" Triple facepalm....
Aliens were just about to make First Contact with humans, then they saw this video and almost destroyed us but they could see, we are already doing just that, so they left.
If I had a kid, I would still check out the series first before letting my kid watch it, because it's a new series - people change. That's just common sense. Now, original episodes of BNtSG, sure...but, a new show, I'd be checking it out beforehand.
What would you do if you walked into the room to find an old friend telling your 14 year old daughter that she should find someone new and give them a handjob?
I have no idea what your problem is, tbh. I don’t find anything about this remotely alienating, except for the sketchy musical artistry involved. What’s your cultural background, if I may ask? I‘m from Germany, and compared to the sex education classes and programs in our schools, this is cutesy and tame.
Would you sit down and watch all episodes of something before letting the kid watch, or would you watch the first 1-3 episodes and then make a decision?
Considering this show isn't actually marketed as for kids, I'd give it more careful scrutiny. Maybe even...oh, I don't know...sit down and watch it with them if they really wanted to see it.
You can talk to them until they're informed all you want, but you're not going to want old men teaching her she that should give handjobs to strangers. Or maybe that's your thing.
When it first Hit many cancelled or threatened to cancel their Netflix accounts...best way to shut this ass-clown down is let your wallet do the talking.
Holy shit. I heard everyone talking about how ridiculous this new bill Nye show is, but what in the name of fuck was that? This is really what we've come to? God save us.
yes everybody should but there are ways of teaching that are betters than others, bringing this kind of song on a science tv show it's not, even if you give someone the consensus to teach your kid about it this song isn't a good option.
Well, some people don't consider 14 year olds adults yet. If you think telling 14 year olds to give someone new a handjob is cool, you're a fucking idiot.
I am downvoting this just to hopefully spare others from watching that terrible link. Thanks for sharing, but no one needs to see that. Bill Nye is terrible.
The tv-14 link is just an imgur of the shows logo or something?
I watched half the second link. Wtf? I'm wondering at this point how many of these people are smack-puppets or even straight up hostages being forced to do this shit. Are they really so caught in their own little bubble of bullshit they think this kind of thing is a good idea on any level?
He was THE MAN back in the day when he was just Bill Nye the Science Guy, getting us all interested in science. Then he was gone. He wasn't on the air anymore. Everyone started to forget. Sure, we had reruns to watch and show our children once we grew up and started families of our own, but Bill wasn't really there. He yearned for the good old days when he was in every classroom, on every TV after school. Now he has an opportunity to appeal to a whole new generation of kids. He sees the way things are now, he's still a smart fella, and he jumps on it. Throws himself into it fully, all the while aware that he's alienating his old audience. It's okay, though. We aren't paying his bills anymore. He's an entertainer. A children's entertainer. He knows what he has to do and say to appease the liberal networks and media. He needs a steady paycheck. But more than that, he wants to be relevant again. He needs it. If he taught real science pertaining to sex and gender, he'd be vilified. I miss the old Bill. The one from my childhood. The Bill that was a rock-solid science guy. The Bill that you could trust to give you the coolest facts and show you awesome experiments. That Bill can never come back now. We've all seen what level he'll stoop to for the sake of being in the spotlight again. RIP Bill Nye the Science Guy. I'll never forget the man you once were.
114 comments
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
Damn. Good point.
1 Aeocs 2017-11-04
This may be the cringiest thing I've ever watched
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
This may be the cringiest thing anyone will ever watch.
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
I lost all respect I had for him when they show him DJing. Holy fuck
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
I lost all respect I had for him....nah...i never respected him.
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
You must be older than 30......he was the best in school. His show actually got me interest in science.
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
spot on
I get that. Its like Alex Jones getting people interested in conspiracy and the deep state....even though hes a disinfo agent,to the laymen, he seems legit...at first.
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
You are dilusional. Bill nye got an entire generation into science. His goal was to teach people. Just because he sold out now doesnt mean he's an Alex Jones. Alex jones wants to sell products with fear not teach people
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Bill sold out a long long time before "now". He has pushed the deep states pseudo science religion for decades. 99% of his degrees are recent and honorary. I think the only legit degree, if you can even call it that, was his BS in mechanical engineering. He is a failed comedian/actor who sold his sole to be a talking head on TV...nothing more....
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
What do you mean by pushes pseudo science religion?
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
He indoctrinates young impressionable minds with false pseudoscientific doctrines like Heliocentrism, theoretical physics and multigenderism. As well as Institutional totalitarianism.
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
Wait a second. Are you a flat earther?
1 AS_WELL_NOT_ASWELL_ 2017-11-04
Did you mean as well?
I am a bot account.
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
I'm a realist. So yeah, I'm a "flat earther".
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahhaha ok buddy. I see now... We are done here. Nice chat. Good luck with your life friend. I will pray for you
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Right back at you pal :)
o/
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
Wait a sec. One more question. How are you mad at people who beleive said 'pseudoscienc' when there is no proof of what you say? Sounds hypocritical
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
There is proof of what I say. That's the point....
Bill and other tools like him, along with useful idiots, ignore and actively suppress actual proof obtained via experimentation in physical reality and replace it with theoretical nonsensical pseudoscientific dogma that completely ignores the scientific method. When they are called out with said proof, they mock, divert, attack, quote their theoretical mathematical dogma and assert their false "scientific authority"...but never produce results from objective real world experimentation.
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
You are using a lot of big words. It almost looks like you are copy pasting this rhetoric from some script. I'm done talking about Bill. We agree to disagree on his ideals. What I do want is your proof of the earth being flat. Because I can proove the diameter of the earth with math and measuring the angle of the sun from different points on the globe. Where is your proof? I want the reason you think the earth is flat? Reasons and evidence not your copy past rhetoric please
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
I'm not copying and pasting anything...I just have the ability to use the brain God gave me before I type. And since I have had this type of conversation many times before, its a topic I am versed in.
First off when i say "flat" its not to say that there aren't mountains and valleys slopes and levels. Its to say its not a globe. The proof is found in the results of real world experimentation. While math is used to calculate the shape of the globe earth in theory, the same math does not coincide with results of real world experimentation.
In other words, I could ask the question, "If the earth was a globe 25k miles in circumference( or a globe of any size), what would be the rate of curvature?" and I could use math to answer that question accurately. But that in of itself does not prove that the earth is a globe 25k miles in circumference( or any size). You still need to apply that math to physical reality via experimentation to obtain proof.
The "scientific" establishment ignores the real world experimentation step because it does not produce the results that they want. And because said experimentation does not produce said result, the earth therefore is NOT a globe 25k miles in circumference (or any size).
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
What is your real world experiment. I want to do it.
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Use this chart as a reference
Basically its the math used to calculate the curvature...and its telling us, "between any two points on a globe with a circumference that TPTB give us, this is how many inches of the globe will impede line of sight.". So at one mile you will lose ~8 inches, at 2 miles you will lose ~32 inches, 3 miles you will lose ~72, so on and so forth.
To conduct the experiment you will need unobstructed line of sight between two points ( western united states will make this easier due to lower population density, but you can still do it in the eastern US...many have used the ocean or great lakes) at roughly the same elevation ( keep track of elevation at both points to account for it) Favorable atmospheric conditions ( meaning a clear day where atmosphere isn't impeding line of sight ) and an adequate zoom lens, telescope or binoculars. ( the human eye has its limitations ).
Probably the easiest thing to do would have 2 6ft or shorter friends stand 3 miles apart and look for each other across the distance. If they can see each other, they have proven that the curvature does not exist because at that distance their line of sight would be blocked by roughly 6 feet of earth if in fact it was a globe with a circumference that TPTB give us. Remember to account for elevation and atmospheric conditions.
FTR, people have tested this at much greater distances.
Whenever I have this conversation I always link this video because I think it is the best summary available, which include examples of above mentioned experiments. There might be one or two points that I am on the fence about, or flat out don't agree with, but to be honest, I have not watched it in some time so don't quote me on that. Regardless, if only the above mentioned experiment is correct, then that's all the proof one would need to at least show that earth is not a globe....I'm just mentioning this because the video goes into more than just the shape of the earth. And to be clear, I don't recommend the video to promote the narrator. I just think its the best summary in an ocean of information and disinformation. I can also link other material as well if you are serious about the topic.
Good Luck and God bless o/
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
So how do satellites orbit the flat disk? Are satellites a myth? You know people live in space right? What benefit does anyone have if the earth is round? Why lie about the shape? Why isnt it square. Are the planets flat too? Is the moon flat? You know we can see planets and moons right? Have you ever seen a ball? You are trying to tell me spacex is fake? You know they can land rockets? You facinate me. No wonder trump is president
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Sorry about the delay....had to step away fro a while.
When speaking in terms of man made orbital satellites such as these, which humorously enough, were first conjured up by a science fiction writer, yes they are a myth.( im going to refer to them as SATS from here on out.) SATS would not be needed on either a globe or a flat earth. Ground based devices could and do establish communication networks that TBTB claim SATS establish. I could go into a bit more detail about this, and will if you would like, but for now I will just conclude by saying that, while I'm sure there are things such as drones and balloons used for temporary networks for multiple reasons, at MUCH lower altitudes than what pseudos claim for SATS, what we are told about SATS is wildly nonsensical and impractical, and in some cases physically impossible.
Well technically everyone lives in space, as all matter occupies space. But I'm confident you meant astronauts live in outer space on the ISS. This is a well established falsehood. There is ample evidence to prove that NASA is little more than a "hollywood production entity" ( see the 200 proofs video for more on this) that creates fabrications to fool the masses. And tbh, their productions are becoming harder to spot due to advances in technology such as Augmented VR. But they have been spotted and will continue to be spotted by those who understand the truth.
Motive will almost always be left to speculation, but IMO, the PRIMARY motive is to establish doubt about God's existence and creations into the masses. As well as control and financial reasons. Funding for "space" programs have generated billions of dollars in revenue over the years via taxation, and TPTB want to be God.
Why isn't your face a square? Its just not the way God made it.
To me, it doesn't always appear so, but regardless, the shape of the planets and or the moon, or what some will refer to as "wandering stars", does not have any bearing on the shape earth because they are all independent from the earth. A room full of monkey's does not make me a monkey simply because I am in the same room as them.
I sure have.
I acknowledge that we see something up there, but people in general just accept what they have been told about them, as opposed to using the scientific method to know for themselves. This is because the ability to use said method to gain knowledge is virtually impossible. TBTB on the other hand lie and tell us that they have the ability to do so, so we should just take their word for it.
SpaceX and other "private companies" are TPTB answer to people waking up to the NASA deceptions. SpaceX and similar companies receive shit tons of funding from governments via subsidies. They are a civilian agency in name only and participate in the same deceptions and productions as NASA does. So yeah, they are fake in all the was that matter.
No one is arguing that rockets exist or that they are used. The argument is about how and where they are used.
I didn't vote for trump and if you want to start slinging tongue in cheek insults, you can find someone else to answer your questions. I have been respectful, and ask that you reciprocate said respect.
I will conclude this by saying that like most globers, you tend to aim your attention and questions to the matters of space above us, when you should be starting your journey of discovery closer to home. Start with the curvature experiment and work your way up. Crawl before you walk, connect the dots along the way and the truth will become apparent.
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
Ok, thanks for answering all of my questions. Where is your proof tho? Where is the edge? If its flat there is an edge right? Finding proof of the edge seems a lot easier than faking entire industries. My career uses the curvature of the earth for a lot of things. If the earth was flat we would be able to use one coordinate syestm for the entire earth. Since it is a ball we cannot use a flat plane. I do transformations on coordinate systems every day. Do you know what that is?
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
The proof come from results of experimentation conducted in our physical reality. Thought we already covered this.
Well, this is a topic still being debated, even within the flat earth community. Primarily because of limitations in the ability of man to traverse the distances and withstand the elements required to conduct experiments. Not to mention the active suppression of information spoken of in my previous comments and restrictions to travel which have been applied using military forces.
This[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/Flat_earth.jpg] is generally accepted as a map of our "flat" earth. Where the north pole is in the center and Antarctica is actually an ice wall making up a perimeter around it, as opposed to globe earth where Antarctica is a land mass on the "south pole" of the globe. So no "edge" to fall off of.
Some have theorized that the "ice wall" expands to infinity, as illustrated here, or that our physical plain of existence expands to infinity and there are multiple "habitats" on said plain, as illustrated here. But most are in agreement that said habitat or habitats are enclosed in a transparent, or ever so slightly opaque, dome of some kind, as illustrated here Some more still have theorized that there is actually liquid or a dense gas on the other side of said dome as illustrated here..an "Aether" if you will, and that the stars and planets are actually traveling through it, using it as a medium in which to travel. This last part could even be considered to be proven correct already, as explained here. But I need to do more study on it to come to a conclusion.
Again, it's extremely difficult to conduct experiments to know the answers to some question for sure because of distance and the elements involved. A lot of these theories have been constructed from known truths, ancient myths,ancient texts, "religious" texts and observations from a distance.
SOmethign worth asking yourself though...Is it just by chance, as scientism would assert, that we as humans have the perfect habitat to thrive in? And at the same time, we have natural barriers from going to far in any one direction? We go to far up and we lose our air to breath and atmospheric pressure and matter as a medium to travel. We go to close or too far from the north pole( the center of flat earth) and we encounter extreme cold. We go too far down below the surface and we encounter extreme heat or too far down in the ocean and encounter extreme pressure. But at the same time we have a vast area to explore and thrive in. Seems almost like a testing ground to me. An ant farm or rat maze, or observatory if you will.
Quick side note about going down and experiencing heat. Did you know that even though scientism claims to know how the inner workings of the globe earth works, down to the depths of its core...the deepest hole on record anyone has ever dug is less than 8 miles below the surface? It's an obvious assertion that scientism says they know what is going on for sure at approximately 500 times that depth...
It does't though, I'm sure you were taught that it does, and just accepted it instead of proving it for yourself (indoctrination). This is brought up in the 200 proofs video multiple times, and here is another video that gets into it. (its long as well)
I'll say maybe...probably even. Again, I haven't done experiments myself to come to a conclusion, but I think information given in this video is very plausible. Though I will not currently rule out genetic manipulation as a means for their past or even present existence. I am not as well versed on this topic, but i have spent some time on it.
sounds like something to do with map making?
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
Stop posting the 200 proofs video. There isnt 1 peice of evidence in it. Just words. Words are not evidence (see the scientific method) I want proof but obviously to you proof is 'belief' so this conversation is over
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
If you cant see the use of a fish eye lens and scene transitioning (video edits) in that spaceX video...i don't know what to tell you. And again...consider the source...
There is though But I agree...video and pictures are one thing....seeing it for yourself is another...this is why i suggested that you should conduct the previously mentioned experiment yourself. And if you actually took the time to watch the 200 proofs video and tried to understand what was being said, you might just learn something.
LOL...I'm pretty sure this is the point I have been trying to get across to you throughout our conversation.....
I don't know how I can say it any differently....proof is obtained by verifying theory via real world experimentation. You want proof? Look at the video I have provided where people are conducting the experiments...or again...go do it yourself.
And lets get something straight here bud...YOU came asking me questions...so anytime you want to stop asking them, that's fine with me. No one is forcing you to be here....
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
What are your thoughts on this?
https://www.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/hawking_genius_ep06_clip01/where-are-we-ch-1-the-circumference-of-the-earth-genius-by-stephen-hawking/#.Wf5f-6lOnKY
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
I see manipulations. They mixed lies with truth to confuse the viewer and to push their false narrative. If the earth was curved, and the lazer remained level, the lazer beam wouldn't have been higher, the earth, or in this case the water on the earth, would have been blocking the lazer beam...or to say, the beam would have had to travel through the water to reach its target. So what happened here is that someone by the lazer angled it up. You can actually see this at the 3:21 mark.
Like I said, TPTB actively try to suppress the truth, by any means available to them. But an objective mind will always discover their deceptions.
Multiple people have actually conducted this experiment without cheating and got the results one would expect if the earth was "flat". There is a lot of disinfo out there. And there were lot of "fair videos" that were readily available in the past on places like youtube that have since been removed and or buried...but I will look for some to share.
But again, you can conduct said experiment yourself with or without a lazer, and I would encourage you to do so. Remain objective and control the conditions of your experiment so that it remains honest and you will get the results I described.
And if you haven't already, watch that 200 proofs video. This particular point is discussed and experiments are shown.
1 dyh10009 2017-11-04
Holy shit. Before reading all you've had to say, I never considered the fact that the earth was flat. I thought people were insane to believe such a thing. You have actually made me consider the possibility of a flat earth. Blew my mind.
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
\ (•◡•) /
Enjoy your stay, and be mindful of those who would seek to deceive you. Stay honest and objective as you continue your journey. Because there will be many obstacles ahead.
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
You can literally see it with your eyes
https://youtu.be/KiTQjippcIo
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
all that shows is the limitations of sight. Apply a lens zoom in zoom out, things will appear and disappear.... curvature is not a factor.
1 NonThinkingPeeOn 2017-11-04
First they laugh.
I will pray for you, friend.
1 I-o-n-i-x 2017-11-04
C'mon man, don't equate realist mentality with FET.
Next time there's a lunar eclipse, go outside and watch.
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
As I have mentioned before, the sun moon and stars are separate from the earth. Their shape, whatever it truly is, does not dictate the shape of the earth. I am not a monkey simply because I am in the same room as a bunch of monkeys.
I acknowledge the phases of the moon, and won't pretend to know what is causing the phases, though i do have theories. But one can prove that the earth is not a globe, so I know that it's not the earths globe shape that is causing them.
1 I-o-n-i-x 2017-11-04
Not sure what that whole monkey business is about...
The Earth is an oblate spheroid, not a globe. Basic calculations that work on perfect globes will not be accurate when attributed to Earth's surface.
The lunar eclipse is Earths shadow cast on the moon. Discarding inconvenient evidence because it doesn't fit a scenario is a red flag that you're being taken for a ride.
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Its an analogy.... moon stars represent the monkeys, the earth represent the person, the room represents 3d space....do you need more to understand what is being said there?
lol...OK Neil DeGrasse Tyson... /s
See thats the thing, they will feed you some tripe like that and then feed you some tripe like this and just keep going back and forth back and forth....all the while you are just being spoon fed different flavors of shit....
Even if the earth was an "oblate spheroid", one would be able to measure for curvature. and you would still be able to see it while doing real world experimentation...even at modest distances....but YOU CANT....because its not there.
Dude that is exactly what you and the majority of the population is doing...disregarding evidence because it doesn't fit your narrative....
Again....the moons phases are a separate issue than the shape of the earth. You only insist that its not because you believe that the earth casting a shadow causes them, because you believe that the world is a sphere...or as neil calls it, a spheroid....but that assertion can be disproved via real world experimentation.
1 I-o-n-i-x 2017-11-04
Lived by the beach my whole life, when the hull of a ship dips below the horizon the effects are clearly visible.
The heliocentric model makes the most sense. You're welcome to disagree, but if you're not able to fit the pieces together any better then I don't think you're gonna win anyone over.
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Apply a lens zoom in zoom out, things will appear and disappear.... curvature is not a factor., what you are experiencing is the vanishing point of your perspective.
Actually it doesn't...if you would like to read what I have had to say about this topic, you can read a conversation I have been having with another user over the last few days. It starts here and continues here and plenty of resources are included to get anyone started.
I disagree because the "flat" stationary earth can be proven via experimentation in physical reality. And I have apparently "fit the pieces together" adequately enough for at least one user in the last day to actually consider the possibility that the earth is "flat" and that the "globe" is false. As seen here. Its not like I am the only one who sees the truth. The debate on the shape of the earth has never stopped....it has only been suppressed and or mocked by TPTB and useful idiots. But thank God for the internet, because more and more people are gaining access to this type of information...
And its not about me "winning people over"...if you want to believe in a spinning globe earth, feel free to do so, but don't tell me that its a proven physical reality, because I can scientifically prove it to be a false reality. It's like all this tranny acceptance stuff being pushed... If you are a man who wants to dress up, take drugs, surgically alter your body to look like a woman, or vice versa...that's your choice...but don't tell me that you ARE a woman and expect me to agree with you...because you aren't...and no amount of theoretical math or assertions is going to make that a physical reality....
1 thinkB4Uact 2017-11-04
You gave me a real LOL. That's noteworthy for a guy like me. You had me going for a moment.
1 Haggis_The_Barbarian 2017-11-04
Just to be clear: you DON'T believe that the earth revolves around the sun?
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Correct. I do not believe the earth revolves around the sun. Because I know that the earth is not in motion.
1 Haggis_The_Barbarian 2017-11-04
Let me guess: is it also flat?
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Basically, yes.
1 unidangit 2017-11-04
I hate that you're being downvoted
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Don't sweat it. Downvotes don't create or change the truth.
1 unidangit 2017-11-04
"tru" -2 Chainz
1 Darth_Venath 2017-11-04
Under rated comment of the century.
His show was the perfect blend of scientific facts, assumptions based on those facts, and completely erroneous or unprovable conclusions based on those assumptions which is essentially the same exact formula that the pseudo scientific religion follows as a whole.
It’s so effective, so pervasive, people fall for it and NEVER question anything anymore.
I could go on, but yeah....
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Well said
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
But I thought you lost all respect
1 BecauseoftheInternet 2017-11-04
I did but that doesnt change the past.....
1 GeoMATTry 2017-11-04
He's a d actor, just like Neil degrasse Tyson. They are both used to push scientism
1 melokobeai 2017-11-04
As a flat earther, there must be very few people you do respect
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Well there are different levels of respect for a number of reasons. I think the number of people I do respect, in one way or another, far outnumber the people I don't. But then again, I have had little to no contact with most of the human population....so who knows?
1 jeff34sonairplanr 2017-11-04
I felt embarrassed when I saw him dancing
1 anunknind 2017-11-04
I didn't know this existed and I was happier that way.
1 Enok-Stroth 2017-11-04
Illuminating isn't it. Same basic concept most people have when it goes to most any conspiracy theory. They are happier not knowing or not believing. It is why most avoid such topics.
1 MyNeverRing 2017-11-04
The video I think was about sexuality. Sex education is an invaluable tool to teach children about the reality of sex and sexual preference. I don't see anything wrong with the video. Bill Nye is not a pedophile. He's one of the good guys. I was taught about sex and genitalia when I was 14. She should have included STDs and pregnancy in the song but okay.
1 Enok-Stroth 2017-11-04
I haven't made any comments one way or the other, my comment was stating how certain information would rather not be known by most people as it could hinder their perception of the world. So, coolio that you perceive Bill Nye as a good guy. It isn't for me to say whether or not he is a pedophile I don't actually know. Nor have I inferred. The subject matter within the video was illuminating was it not?
1 MyNeverRing 2017-11-04
Yeah it was cringe-worthy, but educational. And also, fleshlights. If I had kids I would totally buy them sex toys to masturbate with when they turn 14. I'd rather them masturbate than get knocked up or get an STD. I'm the kind of person that wants people to have knowledge. I don't care if it makes people feel uncomfortable. Better to be safe and aware than in the dark and repressed.
1 Enok-Stroth 2017-11-04
Wait until you have kids my dear. Perhaps your stance will change as they age. Perhaps not. I think it could be beneficial, but I don't think buying a flesh light for your teenage son will deter him from wanting to have sex. If there is a will there is a way. That is the basis for anything though. If you have the will to achieve something and that will isn't easily diminished than it is likely you will achieve that goal. Doesn't matter how long it takes if that is where all your energy is being spent you will achieve it.
1 MyNeverRing 2017-11-04
Well I mean, I guess it's okay? As long as they use condoms, get tested, both CONSENSUAL, legal, and provided they are aware of the consequences then okay?
Purity is virtue. Saving one's self for love is beautiful. But, if people want to get it over with and explore that's also okay. I am all for expression and gettin one's freak on in a healthy, safe, CONSENSUAL way.
Latex bebe, all ovah.
1 MyNeverRing 2017-11-04
I forgot to add, I myself find impure people unattractive. I'm a bit of a prude. But I don't judge 'experienced' people and I wouldn't judge my kids if they want to be 'experienced'. I just personally find that not attractive at all.
1 Enok-Stroth 2017-11-04
Best you can do, is hope you install some moral values into your children and hope they continue growing and developing their own moral values. We can't control our off spring but we can hope to shape their awareness early on.
1 cadhoit_ban 2017-11-04
How many people have you fucked.
1 MyNeverRing 2017-11-04
none
1 cadhoit_ban 2017-11-04
Age range?
1 unidangit 2017-11-04
Citizen! Refrain from your hullabaloo!
1 MyNeverRing 2017-11-04
Just wanted to make one last comment in general. Sexuality is good and is necessary for healthy development. It is when sexual experiences are forced on someone that sex becomes bad. Teens should be able to touch themselves, explore their bodies and when they are ready, be in a committed relationship when they're older. They should be free to love women, men, both. Obviously there must be self control and safe sex is crucial, but sexuality is a beautiful and worthwhile thing to explore. It is who we are.
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
So, when you were 14, an old man was telling you to give handjobs to strangers?
I don't believe you.
1 Zeteo9 2017-11-04
Felt exactly like the first time watching that 'performance;' w.t.f. However, this time, I couldn't get passed the line, "Are my options only hard or moist?" Triple facepalm....
1 textualintercourse 2017-11-04
Something has to come out on him.
1 Glassclose 2017-11-04
Aliens were just about to make First Contact with humans, then they saw this video and almost destroyed us but they could see, we are already doing just that, so they left.
1 brildenlanch 2017-11-04
I can't bare to watch this again. I just couldn't believe it the first time I saw it. It's a weird, vomit-inducing combination of deviancy and cringe.
1 HoneyBadgerJr 2017-11-04
If I had a kid, I would still check out the series first before letting my kid watch it, because it's a new series - people change. That's just common sense. Now, original episodes of BNtSG, sure...but, a new show, I'd be checking it out beforehand.
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
What would you do if you walked into the room to find an old friend telling your 14 year old daughter that she should find someone new and give them a handjob?
1 HoneyBadgerJr 2017-11-04
Depends on how old the kid was. If I didn't watch the episodes, I'd at least look at the guests/synopses...
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
How about if the kid is 14, as is the age recommendation for Bill Nye's butt stuff handjobs.
1 thekintnerboy 2017-11-04
I have no idea what your problem is, tbh. I don’t find anything about this remotely alienating, except for the sketchy musical artistry involved. What’s your cultural background, if I may ask? I‘m from Germany, and compared to the sex education classes and programs in our schools, this is cutesy and tame.
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
Would you sit down and watch all episodes of something before letting the kid watch, or would you watch the first 1-3 episodes and then make a decision?
Because this was episode 9 out of 16.
1 HoneyBadgerJr 2017-11-04
Considering this show isn't actually marketed as for kids, I'd give it more careful scrutiny. Maybe even...oh, I don't know...sit down and watch it with them if they really wanted to see it.
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
It says TV-14. You think that was appropriate content for a 14 year old?
1 HoneyBadgerJr 2017-11-04
Depends on the kid.
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
Let me know when you have a 14 year old daughter and we'll have Bill Nye come over and teach her about giving handjobs to strangers.
1 HoneyBadgerJr 2017-11-04
Like I said, if I had a 14 yo daughter (or son, for that matter), I'd be talking to them so that they're informed.
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
You can talk to them until they're informed all you want, but you're not going to want old men teaching her she that should give handjobs to strangers. Or maybe that's your thing.
1 ridestraight 2017-11-04
When it first Hit many cancelled or threatened to cancel their Netflix accounts...best way to shut this ass-clown down is let your wallet do the talking.
1 LordOfLatveria 2017-11-04
My favorite comment:
1 StephCurryMustard 2017-11-04
Beakman's World was better.
1 SHIT_SNIFF_DIE 2017-11-04
Best comment in this thread
1 napswithdogs 2017-11-04
I grew up on Beakman’s World And was definitely the “weird kid” in school because I didn’t watch Bill Nye. Not much has changed, of course.
1 HyeR 2017-11-04
Holy shit. I heard everyone talking about how ridiculous this new bill Nye show is, but what in the name of fuck was that? This is really what we've come to? God save us.
1 Black-Box 2017-11-04
There is a difference between rape and terrible sex education. Shouldn't you be learning about sex at that age anyways?
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
Let's say you walk into the room to find an old friend telling your 14 year old daughter she should go find someone new and give them a handjob.
And then you're like, "WTF, Frank".
And he's all like, "Shouldn't you be learning about sex at that age anyways?"
1 pentamache 2017-11-04
yes everybody should but there are ways of teaching that are betters than others, bringing this kind of song on a science tv show it's not, even if you give someone the consensus to teach your kid about it this song isn't a good option.
1 LordOfLatveria 2017-11-04
That wasn't teaching about sex.
The message was simple: screw everyone and everything in every manner possible, it doesn't matter as long as you get off.
1 apricotasd10 2017-11-04
Because it's not for children you dumbass?
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
Well, some people don't consider 14 year olds adults yet. If you think telling 14 year olds to give someone new a handjob is cool, you're a fucking idiot.
1 AngryD09 2017-11-04
Can I click on these links with my mother-in-law in the same room?
1 agodgavemethisland 2017-11-04
TV-14
1 Mostofyouareidiots 2017-11-04
I wouldn't click on those links with anyone in the same room because it is so cringeworthy
1 1heirophant 2017-11-04
I am downvoting this just to hopefully spare others from watching that terrible link. Thanks for sharing, but no one needs to see that. Bill Nye is terrible.
1 AngryD09 2017-11-04
The tv-14 link is just an imgur of the shows logo or something?
I watched half the second link. Wtf? I'm wondering at this point how many of these people are smack-puppets or even straight up hostages being forced to do this shit. Are they really so caught in their own little bubble of bullshit they think this kind of thing is a good idea on any level?
1 DavieBPrime 2017-11-04
What did I just watch?
1 naturalproducer 2017-11-04
Cultural Marxism
1 Opikit 2017-11-04
WHWT THE FUCK IS THIS AMERIA?
1 huhbz 2017-11-04
The show was ending this year anyway. But more dramatic if that isn't brought up.
1 GameTheory429 2017-11-04
This can easily be summed up in one word: disturbing
1 assistedSUICIDE 2017-11-04
He was THE MAN back in the day when he was just Bill Nye the Science Guy, getting us all interested in science. Then he was gone. He wasn't on the air anymore. Everyone started to forget. Sure, we had reruns to watch and show our children once we grew up and started families of our own, but Bill wasn't really there. He yearned for the good old days when he was in every classroom, on every TV after school. Now he has an opportunity to appeal to a whole new generation of kids. He sees the way things are now, he's still a smart fella, and he jumps on it. Throws himself into it fully, all the while aware that he's alienating his old audience. It's okay, though. We aren't paying his bills anymore. He's an entertainer. A children's entertainer. He knows what he has to do and say to appease the liberal networks and media. He needs a steady paycheck. But more than that, he wants to be relevant again. He needs it. If he taught real science pertaining to sex and gender, he'd be vilified. I miss the old Bill. The one from my childhood. The Bill that was a rock-solid science guy. The Bill that you could trust to give you the coolest facts and show you awesome experiments. That Bill can never come back now. We've all seen what level he'll stoop to for the sake of being in the spotlight again. RIP Bill Nye the Science Guy. I'll never forget the man you once were.
1 fffgggtttyyy 2017-11-04
He never raped anyone
1 sickofallofyou 2017-11-04
Bill Nye looks like a creepy pedo.
1 Harveyweinstein69 2017-11-04
This is the shit that got trump elected. I welcome it.
1 Harveyweinstein69 2017-11-04
My favorite YouTube comments:
"oops I just became a nazi"
"I'm a trap loving faggot but this is an abomination"
"God has abandoned us"
I've never seen so many people united.
1 NegitiveDeltaG 2017-11-04
What are you freaked out by other people doing butt stuff?
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
I lost all respect I had for him....nah...i never respected him.
1 jeff34sonairplanr 2017-11-04
I felt embarrassed when I saw him dancing
1 Longtimelurker859 2017-11-04
Well said