Already on the front page in a much better format... plus it very specifies "child porn" in the paperwork... it just says they were young looking with pigtails... pigtails is classic "Barely Legal" material.
Haha. All these high level Hollywood heavyweights are dirty. The gatekeepers of Hollywood wouldn’t let them get that big without pedo insurance or other forms of blackmail.
It's just when my eyes see highlighted typewriter font I snap into FBI mode and cease to "read between the lines"... and since child porn wasn't explicitly stated I don't imply it.
I can definitely see how an upset and paranoid wife could think legit legal porn was pedo porn. It's like a whole nitch, legal teens they dress and makeup to come across more scandalous and younger. I haven't exactly "investigated" the gay porn side of town, but I'm sure it's no different. But who knows? You're right not to infer such a grave conclusion, imho. "Pedophile" isn't something you toss around lightly.
Oh... I'm pretty sure he has done plenty of horrendous shit in his life... but I'm not gonna stamp pedophile on his head until we hear something major... this old shit that no one cared about years ago when it released isn't gonna get me heated now.
Now I’m not claiming to be the smartest or most experienced guy in the world but underage looking boys look very different that 18 year old young adults. She wouldn’t mention the underage part if she wasn’t sure. The reason she mentioned it is probabaly because the porn featured small bodied, scrawny boys with baby faces which is typical of people around the ages of 10-13. Of course, she could be referring to toddlers as well. Either way, there is a huge different in the appearance of 18 year men VS 10 year old boys VS 5 year old toddlers. Claiming to know better than Denise, who was actually there and believes she saw underage boys and reported it as such, sounds invalid.
I believe Denise. Charlie is known as a monster and he’s a high level Hollywood tycoon who is probably under pedo insurance.
This is not something one would mention in legal divorce papers unless they were sure of those boys being underage.
I trust Denise judgement. Also, I know almost all of these high level Hollywood heavyweights are dirty. It’s damn near impossible to move up this high in Hollywood and make millions upon millions while protected by the oligarchy unless they have solid blackmail on them. The cabals favorite kind of blackmail is video of these Hollywood heavyweights engaging in sexual intercourse with children. Ditto for politicians.
I trust her judgment in determining if a child is underage. Just because she chose a bad husband doesn’t make her so stupid that she can’t determine if people are underage or not. One thing has nothing to do with the other.
There are allegations that Charlie Sheen sodimized 13 year old Corey Haime.
Do you think Corey maybe mistook a broom that fell and landed in his ass for Charlie’s dick? You know how it is with all that stress at work as a child actor. It can cause full blown hallucinations right?
Lol could be considering the cabal has at least 50 years worth of tech ahead of us. I guess we’ll find out for sure once the cabal is reduced to shambles.
Dude... if you've spent any amount of time around here you'd prolly know that ballsdeep in FBI files are where I'm usually at... I'm not LARPing at anything... Everyone knows I'm not a fucking secret agent or anything... I just am really into the FBI.
Are you saying that I should know who you are? Bahahahahaha
Idk who you think you are. Whether you are in "customer service" or "the bread line". All I know is you replied to me twice about being a secret agent, and you seem awfully pleased to think someone thinks you are anyone. To be clear, I was merely commenting to ensure the other people reading this that you are, in fact, a jerk off.
If you spent any time in the new queue you'd certainly know my MO and interests. I'm pretty prolific... but the folks that hang out here on the regular know that I'm a huge FBI fanboy... not some guy LARPing as secret agent insider. It's okay that you don't know... but now ya do.
You are an FBI fanboy? The faggotry you present is astounding. I'm glad everyone else agrees with me in that you are a lame fuckwad who deserves to be ostracized.
Honestly I've been a regular here for years, this is an alt of mine when my other account was shadowbanned for script monkey, I have no idea who the fuck you are, people don't come here for "personalities" and we really don't give a shit to know anything about you other than you come off as a blowhard with an agenda.
I know who he is, and so do a fair amount of us. You, on the otherhand... I am drawing a blank.
He's never claimed to be FBI in anything i have read. I am interested? np source?
Name calling? Gaslighting? Deflection? For someone who doesnt seemingly know anything about the copious amounts of incriminating fbi files, i kindly ask that you research for yourself, and if not, sit down and let the big kids talk.
You are saying I'm not in the big kids club? :( Aw shucks.
I guess I'm glad that my contributions here aren't as prolific. Which of course makes me unrecognizable to the I's or the us' of the world. Thats because I keep to myself and don't stick my nose where it shouldn't belong.
I was joking that he was FBI because in another thread and comment chain on the topic of pizzagate, u/ninjakick666 claimed to have expertise in mannerisms and profiling (LOL). So I followed him here to where he is speaking about his deference to the FBI.
I've received several PM's now from u/ninjakick666 and all of them are rude, deflecting and exactly the crap you are trying to place on me. Get the fuck out of here dude. That guy I was talking to is dis-info at its worst. Sticking up for him (larper) rather than I (upstanding citizen) is abusrd.
Child porn is a very serious accusation. The Headline is misleading. She said the people in the porn looked very young. Firstly, that doesn't prove they were under-age; secondly, she had to state things as starkly as possible in a divorce proceeding, even less reason to simply trust what she says.
Charlie Sheen may indeed get involved in those kinds of things, but this is very weak evidence.
pigtails on boys? Did you even read the report? what kind of 'barely legal' material is normal for you if you're talking about young boys with pigtails?
Yeah I said this was on the frontpage in a much better format... I'm referring to the full case files... not just... I dunno what he linked to... I didn't click it... the full files have the pigtail stuff in it.
In other threads he's agonizing over how he's a "known regular" here and buddies of his are jumping in to defend him, since when is that even a thing here?
57 comments
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
Already on the front page in a much better format... plus it very specifies "child porn" in the paperwork... it just says they were young looking with pigtails... pigtails is classic "Barely Legal" material.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
Ya, I noticed you were quick to defend him.
“Oh they were probably just barely legal sites.”
Haha. All these high level Hollywood heavyweights are dirty. The gatekeepers of Hollywood wouldn’t let them get that big without pedo insurance or other forms of blackmail.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
It's just when my eyes see highlighted typewriter font I snap into FBI mode and cease to "read between the lines"... and since child porn wasn't explicitly stated I don't imply it.
1 DukeLeto2 2017-11-09
Read between the lines of "gay pornography sites" and "boys looked very young"?
1 exasperated_facepalm 2017-11-09
I can definitely see how an upset and paranoid wife could think legit legal porn was pedo porn. It's like a whole nitch, legal teens they dress and makeup to come across more scandalous and younger. I haven't exactly "investigated" the gay porn side of town, but I'm sure it's no different. But who knows? You're right not to infer such a grave conclusion, imho. "Pedophile" isn't something you toss around lightly.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
Oh... I'm pretty sure he has done plenty of horrendous shit in his life... but I'm not gonna stamp pedophile on his head until we hear something major... this old shit that no one cared about years ago when it released isn't gonna get me heated now.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
Now I’m not claiming to be the smartest or most experienced guy in the world but underage looking boys look very different that 18 year old young adults. She wouldn’t mention the underage part if she wasn’t sure. The reason she mentioned it is probabaly because the porn featured small bodied, scrawny boys with baby faces which is typical of people around the ages of 10-13. Of course, she could be referring to toddlers as well. Either way, there is a huge different in the appearance of 18 year men VS 10 year old boys VS 5 year old toddlers. Claiming to know better than Denise, who was actually there and believes she saw underage boys and reported it as such, sounds invalid.
I believe Denise. Charlie is known as a monster and he’s a high level Hollywood tycoon who is probably under pedo insurance.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
When you are married to a gross slob like Charlie Sheen every dude with teeth and no beer belly prolly looks young to you.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
So you are saying she imagined the whole thing about seeing underage boys because she is married to a slob?
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
I'm just saying every 19 year old looks 16 when you've been watching GILF porn for the last year.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
This is not something one would mention in legal divorce papers unless they were sure of those boys being underage.
I trust Denise judgement. Also, I know almost all of these high level Hollywood heavyweights are dirty. It’s damn near impossible to move up this high in Hollywood and make millions upon millions while protected by the oligarchy unless they have solid blackmail on them. The cabals favorite kind of blackmail is video of these Hollywood heavyweights engaging in sexual intercourse with children. Ditto for politicians.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
You trust her judgement? She married Charlie Sheen.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
I trust her judgment in determining if a child is underage. Just because she chose a bad husband doesn’t make her so stupid that she can’t determine if people are underage or not. One thing has nothing to do with the other.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
Tell me more!
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
There are allegations that Charlie Sheen sodimized 13 year old Corey Haime.
Do you think Corey maybe mistook a broom that fell and landed in his ass for Charlie’s dick? You know how it is with all that stress at work as a child actor. It can cause full blown hallucinations right?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOH9g60UIAU8seh.jpg:large
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
Tell me even more!
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
That is all detective. :/
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
I was just trying to keep you confined to this topic with busy work so ya weren't out shitting up the new queue.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
Ah, good strategy.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
It's a dirty job, but someone has to do it. Luckily this bot runs smoothly so no one ever knows I'm not a real person.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
Lol could be considering the cabal has at least 50 years worth of tech ahead of us. I guess we’ll find out for sure once the cabal is reduced to shambles.
1 dwarfwhore 2017-11-09
Here you are Larping as an FBI agent again hahahahaha
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
Dude... if you've spent any amount of time around here you'd prolly know that ballsdeep in FBI files are where I'm usually at... I'm not LARPing at anything... Everyone knows I'm not a fucking secret agent or anything... I just am really into the FBI.
1 dwarfwhore 2017-11-09
Are you saying that I should know who you are? Bahahahahaha
Idk who you think you are. Whether you are in "customer service" or "the bread line". All I know is you replied to me twice about being a secret agent, and you seem awfully pleased to think someone thinks you are anyone. To be clear, I was merely commenting to ensure the other people reading this that you are, in fact, a jerk off.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
If you spent any time in the new queue you'd certainly know my MO and interests. I'm pretty prolific... but the folks that hang out here on the regular know that I'm a huge FBI fanboy... not some guy LARPing as secret agent insider. It's okay that you don't know... but now ya do.
1 dwarfwhore 2017-11-09
You are an FBI fanboy? The faggotry you present is astounding. I'm glad everyone else agrees with me in that you are a lame fuckwad who deserves to be ostracized.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
Yeah... I like the FBI. Whatever... what do you like?
1 CelineHagbard 2017-11-09
Removed. Rule 1.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2017-11-09
Honestly I've been a regular here for years, this is an alt of mine when my other account was shadowbanned for script monkey, I have no idea who the fuck you are, people don't come here for "personalities" and we really don't give a shit to know anything about you other than you come off as a blowhard with an agenda.
1 asailorssway 2017-11-09
I know who he is, and so do a fair amount of us. You, on the otherhand... I am drawing a blank. He's never claimed to be FBI in anything i have read. I am interested? np source?
Name calling? Gaslighting? Deflection? For someone who doesnt seemingly know anything about the copious amounts of incriminating fbi files, i kindly ask that you research for yourself, and if not, sit down and let the big kids talk.
1 FroggyLives 2017-11-09
Seems to be a lot of bullying around here today.
1 dwarfwhore 2017-11-09
You are saying I'm not in the big kids club? :( Aw shucks.
I guess I'm glad that my contributions here aren't as prolific. Which of course makes me unrecognizable to the I's or the us' of the world. Thats because I keep to myself and don't stick my nose where it shouldn't belong.
I was joking that he was FBI because in another thread and comment chain on the topic of pizzagate, u/ninjakick666 claimed to have expertise in mannerisms and profiling (LOL). So I followed him here to where he is speaking about his deference to the FBI.
I've received several PM's now from u/ninjakick666 and all of them are rude, deflecting and exactly the crap you are trying to place on me. Get the fuck out of here dude. That guy I was talking to is dis-info at its worst. Sticking up for him (larper) rather than I (upstanding citizen) is abusrd.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
Post a screenshot... cause I've never messaged you in my entire life... Or you can just fuck off with your unsubstantiated claims.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2017-11-09
Holy shit my sides.
1 damukobrakai 2017-11-09
The elite are allegedly luciferians and are required to worship with child sex and child sacrifice.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
Yes. Shocking but very true.
1 DereIzNoPoint 2017-11-09
Child porn is a very serious accusation. The Headline is misleading. She said the people in the porn looked very young. Firstly, that doesn't prove they were under-age; secondly, she had to state things as starkly as possible in a divorce proceeding, even less reason to simply trust what she says.
Charlie Sheen may indeed get involved in those kinds of things, but this is very weak evidence.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
Charlie Sheen has all the symptoms of a child pornographer. He is Hollywood elite. Actors can't get that high without pedo insurance.
1 DereIzNoPoint 2017-11-09
That may be true, I don't know, I'm just saying this specifically is very weak evidence.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
True. This is still officially a theory.
1 oneinfinitecreator 2017-11-09
pigtails on boys? Did you even read the report? what kind of 'barely legal' material is normal for you if you're talking about young boys with pigtails?
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
I'm talking about the full document that covers the other allegations as well... And I'll have you know that I look damned cute in pigtails.
1 oneinfinitecreator 2017-11-09
So what does pigtails have to do with gay pornography that featured what looked like underage boys to Denise Richards? You're in the wrong thread.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
Yeah I said this was on the frontpage in a much better format... I'm referring to the full case files... not just... I dunno what he linked to... I didn't click it... the full files have the pigtail stuff in it.
1 Khronikos 2017-11-09
The real question is why is charlie sheen browsing porn if front of his wife?
1 pmichel 2017-11-09
maybe even in front of his kids and if you read the report, he is defiant about it. Also his twins were showing classic signs of abuse.
1 TheLegionnaire 2017-11-09
Not defending anyone but you should feel free to browse porn in front of your wife. She's your wife... Anyone else would be a lot weirder.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2017-11-09
Jesus dude you are all over these pedophile threads deflecting and defending, what the fuck is your deal?
1 pmichel 2017-11-09
666 tells you what he is about
1 WeWuzKANG5 2017-11-09
In other threads he's agonizing over how he's a "known regular" here and buddies of his are jumping in to defend him, since when is that even a thing here?
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
Pederasts should all go burn in hell...
1 rickyshavinalaff 2017-11-09
PINNING
1 asailorssway 2017-11-09
I snorted. Shame on us.
1 AquaboogieArt 2017-11-09
Bet that little kid from Two and a Half Men knows something
1 stinkypickles 2017-11-09
Didn't he leave the show and refuse to work with them again or something?
1 Industrialists_Coup 2017-11-09
Really sucks he has to be one of the only 9/11 truth proponents with national recognition.
1 FroggyLives 2017-11-09
Yes it is.
1 Ninjakick666 2017-11-09
When you are married to a gross slob like Charlie Sheen every dude with teeth and no beer belly prolly looks young to you.
1 LightBringerFlex 2017-11-09
That is all detective. :/
1 pmichel 2017-11-09
maybe even in front of his kids and if you read the report, he is defiant about it. Also his twins were showing classic signs of abuse.
1 TheLegionnaire 2017-11-09
Not defending anyone but you should feel free to browse porn in front of your wife. She's your wife... Anyone else would be a lot weirder.