Let's see who is really non-partisan in this sub. George Bush and Hillary Clinton both accused of obstructing justice to hide sex crimes that included pedophilia
141 2017-11-10 by ArchonFall4All
First, George W. Bush. I will quote the details below, which come from the Wikileaks Global Intelligence Files here: https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/47/475107_agents-bush-firings-obstructed-sex-spy-probe-.html
According to U.S. intelligence sources, President Bush obstructed justice last December when he had senior advisor Karl Rove and White House Counsel Harriet Miers instruct Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez to fire eight U.S. attorneys who were among several others conducting ongoing public corruption and secret national security grand jury investigations connected to an espionage linked prostitution / pedophile sex ring operating at the Washington Ritz-Carlton and other DC hotels, whose clients included U.S. senators and congressmen, elite Washington news reporters and high government officials some of whom were named by an intelligence insider.
And look what is claimed in the second part of the file:
Central to the scandal is fired U.S. attorney Carole Lam of California who was reportedly conducting testimony before grand juries linking indicted former Bush CIA Executive Director Kyle Dustya Foggo and convicted Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff to the sex ring, Israeli espionage, GOP Under Secretary of Defense for policy Douglas J. Feith, a forged British intelligence dossier used by Mr. Bush to deceive Americans into supporting war against Iraq and an attempt to plant weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq before the war via an intelligence pipeline through Dubai and Turkey.
Using a forged British intelligence dossier to deceive Americans into supporting an Iraq invasion AND an attempt to plant WMDs in Iraq? Hmm, very interesting.
Moving on
Who else has been accused of a similar obstruction of justice into almost identical crimes? Hillary Clinton, while Secretary of State. This story originally broke on NBC with a report by Chuck Todd. Interestingly enough, the video of the report has largely been scrubbed from the internet, and Youtube users that shared the video have had their accounts suspended. Luckily, I was able to find one which is still up, and part of the video is transcribed below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hubT6i30WDE
"There is an old saying in Washington that the cover-up is worse than the crime. But in this case both parts of it are disturbing,” Chuck Todd continued.
“Allegations of prostitution and pedophilia, and allegations that those crimes were somehow covered up or not looked into. So the State Department this morning is having to respond to those claims, and those investigations involve misconduct by State Department officials, including an Ambassador and security agents attached to then secretary of state, Hillary Clinton.”
“The allegations are that these investigations were whitewashed, quashed altogether, and that those orders came from high up.”
“NBC has obtained documents relating to ongoing investigations into some disturbing allegations involving State Department personnel and at least one ambassador. A State Department memo says, quote, “the Ambassador routinely ditched his protective security detail in order to solicit sexual favors from both prostitutes and minor children.
“The memo also says a top State Department official directed State Department investigators to “cease the investigation” into the ambassador’s conduct.” It’s just one of what another document describes as “several examples of undue influence” from top State Department officials.”
Is anybody noticing a familiar trend? If you're truly non-partisan, then you'll push to have all sides of our government held accountable for participating in and covering up these heinous acts. It truly is a non-partisan issue, and the truth needs to come to light
36 comments
1 RocketSurgeon22 2017-11-10
Dude its the Establishment not Right vs Left. I'm anti-Establishment
1 ArchonFall4All 2017-11-10
Yes, I think that's a good distinction. I just worded it that way given the recent trend on this sub
1 antifathroway 2017-11-10
You must have been pretty pissed when Jeff Sessions became AG.
1 RocketSurgeon22 2017-11-10
Yup. Pretty much most of those appointed.
1 AlabamaRussianHacker 2017-11-10
One of the things I got from this is that apparently The US government has a history of getting fake dossiers from British spies....
1 RocketSurgeon22 2017-11-10
I'm sure they do. This was a smear against a candidate that was funded by the opposing candidate, sitting President of the United States, DNC, Establishment Republicans, FBI and media.
1 AlabamaRussianHacker 2017-11-10
And this shows Bush used a British spy dossier to argue WMDs were in Iraq
1 RocketSurgeon22 2017-11-10
We should use this sub to crowdsource a dossier on Bush. We submit it to the media claiming it was foreign intelligence reports hacked by anons.
1 DstopianParadise 2017-11-10
Same here. It'll be a fine day when the Bush's and Clinton's are in the past - distant past.
1 jsstealthss 2017-11-10
Money shot right here. The intentional misdirection by some "users" here to turn arguments (such as ElsaGate) into a Dems vs Repubs argument is a divide and conquer technique. Please don't fall for it, guys.
Also, if I may take the time to say fuck Bush and his administration in particular for pushing for a false war that got a few of my friends killed. And fuck you too Obama for giving people false hope of actually pulling out of Iraq/Afghan. Finally, fuck both of you for murdering the 4th amendment.
1 fionnstoned 2017-11-10
Burn them all
1 flip-trick 2017-11-10
so many "lets see who.." [is this or that] posts lately.. seems like a divide and conquer technique to me.. everyone is entitled to their own opinions.. this sub's subscribers will never have the same views on everything, that's what makes this community great.. if you left off the first part of your title, i wouldn't have had an issue with this post..
1 Question_History 2017-11-10
They're all complicit. Right and left.
It's how TPTB run things. They profile sexual deviants, put them in positions of power and blackmail them behind the scenes to pull strings.
Why do you think Hoover was a gay cross-dresser? Because he would've been lynched back in the day if the public found out! That's how they controlled the FBI.
1 antifathroway 2017-11-10
Nah, too easy for Trump partisans to slip in since most of them don't care to support the Bushes.
1 ZiggyAdventures 2017-11-10
The same can be said of Democrat partisans, Hillary was a presidential candidate and Bill is decades ago now. Obama would be relevant like Trump.
1 Freonbarb 2017-11-10
"How can I make this about Trump?"
1 beatsbeingbroke 2017-11-10
That’s why I come here. Literally the only place I can find information not left/right leaning.
1 timmyg2017 2017-11-10
If you think there's no left and right wing propaganda and fake news, you are a sucker. I don't know of anywhere on the internet or any newspaper or any form of media that does not have some sort of spin. You just have to question everything and use critical thinking to weed out the actual fake news and spin.
1 TheBongzilla 2017-11-10
You could say the exact same things with less words and a better language. Be kind, you fucker.
1 beatsbeingbroke 2017-11-10
that’s reddit for ya
1 notacrackheadofficer 2017-11-10
Harper's magazine.
1 notacrackheadofficer 2017-11-10
Harper's magazine has always picked every politician they get their hands on, apart. I recommend it.
1 Allinon72 2017-11-10
Not sure what you're reading, but I gone across very few people defending Bush in this sub.
1 Green_Lives_Matter 2017-11-10
Dude ask anyone who posts in TD, we want to see the Bush family hang as much as the clintons.
1 ArchonFall4All 2017-11-10
This was more a response to the user who created this very disingenuous thread yesterday: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/7bxhpn/pedogate_is_not_a_partisan_issue/
And of course, that same user made this comment just a short while ago:
I'm just trying to call out the hypocrisy floating around
1 terminalyo 2017-11-10
I guess I must be non-partisan, because there is literally no way either of them did that.
1 Johnny_Oldschool 2017-11-10
Hang them both for all I care.
1 beatsbeingbroke 2017-11-10
That’s what I meant. At least there are both sides here.
1 rbsams72888 2017-11-10
Ehem.
Fuck them all.
I don’t even trust that WL isn’t compromised.
The Bush dynasty is built on Nazi concentration camp slave labor. Hitler’s rise to power was planned , funded, and orchestrated by American investment.
The Clinton family is a criminal enterprise.
They’re all evil.
1 Silentbtdeadly 2017-11-10
"he doesn't run anything"?
Fucking seriously?
1 bizmarxie 2017-11-10
This is what us Bernie folks call "the Oligarchy". The Clintons and the Bushes are the same. Research Mena, Arkansas.
1 Doubtful1111 2017-11-10
Get that goddamn video about Hilary on a site YouTube won't remove it from pleas
1 imLC 2017-11-10
I would jump for joy to see such prominent figures pursued for justice, end of story.
1 ArchonFall4All 2017-11-10
It’s coming. I can’t guarantee that it’ll be full justice, but we’re entering a new era
1 IHAVESEEN 2017-11-10
Fuck them both.
1 AvatarRyan123 2017-11-10
They are both deep state puppets
1 Dummy_Detector 2017-11-10
Fucking lock them both up! This is not a thing.
1 itrv1 2017-11-10
Hang them both. Then the rest of their families. All of them. No exceptions. We as a nation must show that the politicians work for US and their actions against the people are not forgiven.
1 maralieus 2017-11-10
I like it.
1 timmyg2017 2017-11-10
If you think there's no left and right wing propaganda and fake news, you are a sucker. I don't know of anywhere on the internet or any newspaper or any form of media that does not have some sort of spin. You just have to question everything and use critical thinking to weed out the actual fake news and spin.
1 notacrackheadofficer 2017-11-10
Harper's magazine has always picked every politician they get their hands on, apart. I recommend it.