because they've maintained absolute silence. it's there only strategy. somebody fucked up big time on this operation and their best bet is to remain silent so we don't figure it out. really our best bet at this point is probably some of these lawsuits in action against MGM that will force Jesus to testify, and evidence to leak. Not saying play the waiting game in the meantime, but, not much to go on. Suggestions are appreciated.

but it's being tainted by trying to tie it into random shit like Saudi princes

Random?

Whatever, dude.

Ah, so you're either a troll, or completely oblivious. The Saudi connection is not random, it is a connection. It is also a pattern. You are a liar.

Think about all the shit that’s been shoveled on top of this story since it’s broken. TPTB have moved on, so why shouldn’t you?

because it's a glaring discrepancy that doesn't often happen at this magnitude; and if exposed could garner positive change in the world.. maybe that's why? who the fuck cares if TPTB move on from a subject.

It’s rhetoric; of course we need to dig into this. There is so much that doesn’t add up here, but it literally has occurred 100 news cycles ago and no one cares. In my opinion it could be the JFK of our time.

It’s rhetoric; of course we need to dig into this shit. There is so much that doesn’t add up here, but it literally has occurred 100 news cycles ago and no one cares. In my opinion it could be the JFK of our time.

Friend made this,

whaddya think?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJPWrKPmHmM&feature=share

I think it is a good sign. There are attempts at misinformation and they are not being jumped on. It is latent, that is better than misled.

i find it funny how you all want answers to some complete bullshit. pretend it is sandy hook and accept it and move the fuck on. It was a keystone event and you wonder why nothing adds up.

There's a bunch on here who won't even acknowledge that Sandy Hook was a hoax. Or maybe a few with a bunch of accounts.

I don't acknowledge that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax. In fact, I believe it happened.

Then you're easily fooled by bad crisis acting. Or you haven't done any research beyond reading mainstream headlines.

Oh yeah? And you have done a lot of research? Lots of blog reading, eh? Scoped out a bunch of Youtube videos that debunk the evil msm? Lolz. You ever actually go to the town in CT and Interview anyone that lived there at the time? Talked to school employees, neighbors, people in local law enforcement?...

Wolfgang Halbig has done all that. Have you?

First you shouldn't attempt to paint me with such broad strokes. I don't mock all conspiracy theorists. I only mock some. Also, I don't defend msm so much as I don't demonize it like others here. As for ole' Wolfgang Halbig, I don't know much about him, but what I am researching suggests that the guy is a complete crackpot. But, if you have video interviews with the townspeople Newton staying that the shooting was a hoax, please share because although I don't believe in your theory, I still keep an open mind.

I should paint you with broad strokes because you come to this sub as a professional "debunker".

It's obvious when you dismiss any source out hand if it is not a big recognizable 3-letter mainstream organization.

You make an unreasonable argument that unless we have personally gone to the location and spoken to the people who live there, that we shouldn't form an opinion. In other words, you are mocking all secondary research.

So you want primary research, which Wolfgang Halbig has done. You say you don't know much about Wolfgang Halbig (so you yourself have not done any research at all on the topic), yet at the same time you also arbitrarily claim to know he is a complete crackpot without giving any reason or evidence why. So you mock primary researcher for no reason.

It is so obvious you are only here to discredit conspiracy theorists. I would say you are that which is protected by Rule 10.

Lolz, I'm a pro debunker now? Awww, shucks. That's kind, but I'm still just an am. I appreciate your encouragement to turn pro, though. I don't dismiss any source that doesn't come from the msm. I dismiss any source that doesn't provide solid, substantial, objective evidence as proof. Is that too much to ask? I, certainly don't think so. As for Wolfgang, I admit I don't know much about him. I simply stated that what I had read gives me the impression that he doesn't know what he is talking about. Although, I did state that I would be open to changing my mind about the shooting if someone had evidence such as video's of the townsfolk of Newton stating that the shooting never happened. I feel like that evidence would definitely be available if it existed. I find it hard to believe that no one investigating this so called hoax has taken the time to go interview persons who were in and around the school that day.

And what is it that you have read that discredits Halbig? He's worked in law enforcement, as school principal, and as a school district director of safety. Nothing in his background suggests he's a "crackpot". I'd like to hear what you have read that suggests he doesn't know what he's talking about.

I'll repeat, I don't think you gone beyond reading MSM headlines regarding Sandy Hook.

I could do a Google search with the phrase "debunking Wolfgang Halbig" and send you the results, but I doubt you would accept those results. As I have said before, I am open minded to things if people provide solid, substantial, objective evidence to back their claim. I suggested that video of people from the town, school, local law enforcement, stating that the shooting didn't happen would definitely make me question the official narrative, but you just seem to want to deflect rather than produce the evidence. Interesting.

I could do a Google search with the phrase "debunking Wolfgang Halbig" and send you the results

So you lied when you said you read something about Halbig being shady. You haven't read anything at all about him.

but you just seem to want to deflect rather than produce the evidence

That's exactly what you are doing here.

I suggested that video of people from the town, school, local law enforcement, stating that the shooting didn't happen would definitely make me question the official narrative

So you want to see video of people who participated in the hoax to admit that it was a hoax. You are not a very smart man, are you?

Not sure how saying I could do a search and send you the results translates into me saying I have never done the search, but ok. Here you go, though. As for the lack of video evidence of people in the area at the time stating that the shooting never happened being because everyone was a part of the hoax? OK. You got proof of that?

First you said he read somewhere that he's a crackpot. Then you said he doesn't know what he's talking about. Now you have to google "debunking Wolfgang Halbig". Seems you can't get your story straight. Seems you haven't read anything about him at all until now.

It's quite revealing of your agenda that you enter "debunking Wolfgang Halbig" into the search field rather than simply "Wolfgang Halbig".

The first hit on your search is from www.crisisactorsguild.com. You are a fucking joke.

Besides those actually participating in the hoax, why would anyone else in the town know?

If you watched either "We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook" or "Dear Wolfgang" you will find tons of evidence that it's a hoax. But I know you haven't and you won't. You're not interested. You're on a mission here.

I thought I was to provide evidence debunking Halbig. I can't type that phrase in to Google to search for evidence?

It was a FEMA drill. Nothing more. That's why there is no disclosure.

bitchute.com/video/XAlfWv5uoWmy/