well, I am sure it has been done, but commercially not so much. I think most of the google earth pics are those they bought from various sources. There likely isn't a lot of commercial pull to survey cold wasteland vs surveying land that could be used for cell towers, or pipelines, or (whatever commercial interest).

we also have satellites spinning the world in orbit, but I imagine the orbit for a sat that crosses the poles would look really weird, and I wonder how sustainable it would be.

There are tons of areal pictures of Antarctica, what are you talking about? You won't find as many on things like Google Earth or Maps, because those photos are all composite images taken by planes. Planes don't fly over Antarctica.

Are you discounting the satellite images we see on google earth?

"The only pictures available are fake."

-OP probably

Do you mean compared to aerial photos of cities?

Because there are photos of antactica, just that for the barren landscapes that cover most of it - Those photo are low quality. The same goes for most of the sea on Google Maps as well as large amounts of uninhabited inland areas for most countries.

Google Maps doesn't provide ultra high res images for most of the Earth.

Weird, all they have to do is show a picture of white.

Satellites are very difficult to make pass directly over a pole. The most natural satellite orbits are perpendicular to the axis of rotation, since you can use the Earth's rotation to help "throw" them into that orbit. Getting them to pass over poles requires a shitload of fuel...fire up Kerbal Space Program and try it. You have to first negate all the momentum of Earth's rotation just to get to a standstill, then you have to add all the energy necessary to get it moving North-South from a standstill. That energy is much, much more than it takes to get it into that easy East-West orbit to begin with, since you don't have the rotation helping you.

Not saying they can't do it...but I don't think they'd bother just to get some pictures. They'd need more mission objectives to make it worthwhile.

Yup. They're hiding something. Entrance to inner earth is at the poles.

If there is an inner earth why cant we drill far into the ground? How do they handle the pressure?

I would find that odd if it was even slightly true, but it isn't.

Present your evidence squire!

Use google earth and try and zoom in on the north and south poles. Notice the perfect circle on the south? Notice how the north pole is photoshopped? Why?

low res = photoshop?

Govt site. Not shocking to me. Would really like it if someone could manage to get a shot though.

It’s not a govt site and there are plenty of pictures, including of the South Pole base.

There's reliable shots of the no fly zone?

Satellites don't have to follow no fly zones iirc

Yeah but anything via google earth will probably be blurred/edited. NASA sure as shit won't show it.

Yeah I searched for weeks and the only ones I could find are absolutely useless potato quality - like one pixel = a few hundred miles. And this, for an area that's supposedly melting and going to kill us all.

I suspect the whole center is melted, which implies heat is rising from Earth's core, which implies energy from "nothing"... which implies oil and water are renewable and free energy is a thing.

On mobile, will post link shortly; it's very damning.

Everything about it is weird, absolutely one of the biggest conspiracies imo and support it every time it's brought up.

Any imaging besides basic and lower quality satellite photos is just hidden from us, from sure they have it. But whatever the fuck is down there we do not have the full story on. For sure some sort of entrance into some sort of inner Earth "realm" for lack of a better world (imo).

For sure? Really?

"The only pictures available are fake."

-OP probably