r/conspiracy: In August 2015, Page wrote to Strzok, "I just saw my first Bernie Sander [SIC] bumper sticker. Made me want to key the car." Strzok replied, "He's an idiot like Trump. Figure they cancel each other out."

In August 2015, Page wrote to Strzok, "I just saw my first Bernie Sander [SIC] bumper sticker. Made me want to key the car." Strzok replied, "He's an idiot like Trump. Figure they cancel each other out."

56 2017-12-13 by JakeElwoodDim5th

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/peter-strzok-lisa-page-texts-trump-idiot/

They never thought she would lose.

32 comments

1 TrumpsPutridAnus 2017-12-13

Strozk was only on the investigation very briefly and mainly got coffee for the bigger boys.

1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-12-13

Special Agent Peter Strzok and his mistress, a Justice Department lawyer, share a love, and a love of criticizing President Trump. But Strzok wasn’t all texting and no action: he reportedly watered down the conclusion of Comey’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information from "grossly negligent” — a criminal offense — to "extremely careless;" gave Clinton cronies Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills a pass when he interviewed them in the Hillary Emailgate investigation; and coordinated with Andy McCabe to interview Michael Flynn without lawyers present. This over-achiever is now under investigation by the Justice Department Inspector General for his role in the Hillary Emailgate investigation.

Why are you trying to imply he's insignificant?

http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/363589-the-fbis-constant-bungling-is-an-american-embarrassment

1 TrumpsPutridAnus 2017-12-13

He was there for about 2 weeks and Mueller got rid of him.

He was a coffee boy.

1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-12-13

He was in the special counsel for about 2 weeks, you mean. His partisanship and lack objectivity was clear, he should have never been there. He's been important in the FBI behind the scenes. What is someone like this doing actively participating in the HRC investigation?

1 TrumpsPutridAnus 2017-12-13

What is someone like this doing actively participating in the HRC investigation?

Its his job? People like coffee.

1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-12-13

Seems like if you fetch enough coffee you can get away with obstruction of Justice at the FIB, I see.

1 TrumpsPutridAnus 2017-12-13

Get away with it by being removed from the investigation and in turn being investigated yourself by the inspector general?

Yeah he totes got away with it bro

1 TooManyCookz 2017-12-13

So you admit he influenced the investigation. K.

1 CaptainApollyon 2017-12-13

How would you know?

1 TrumpsPutridAnus 2017-12-13

Q said as much

https://pastebin.com/NBTQVYRY

1 Apersonofinterest666 2017-12-13

Don’t fall for the troll trap ^{^{^}}

1 1-800-YoureRetarded 2017-12-13

Who cares? You can't staff a special counsel with Trump cultists and you can't staff with Clintonites. He got rid of a clintonites. I don't think over reacting to defend the POTUS is warranted.

1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-12-13

It should be staffed with people who are completely objective.

1 1-800-YoureRetarded 2017-12-13

Yes and that's why they got rid of a partisan.

1 Speedupslowdown 2017-12-13

people

completely objective

Pick one.

1 RD_AG 2017-12-13

its their oath of duty. might be hard for someone still dependent on their parents to grab that concept but men do.

1 HBombthrow 2017-12-13

No, we shouldn't have political loyalty tests for government employees. That's what guys like Mao and Stalin do. Government employees are allowed to have private political preferences as long as it doesn't interfere with their work. It's their fundamental right as Americans.

1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-12-13

Not to politicians, but to the Constitution and it's laws.

1 HBombthrow 2017-12-13

All federal employees take an oath when they're hired to uphold the Constitution and the laws, and can be fired if they do not.

1 TooManyCookz 2017-12-13

as long as it doesn’t interfere with their work.

That’s the real issue in this case. The guy was involved in way too many pro-Clinton decisions. For example, suggesting Comey change the wording of his public statement in the Clinton investigation to avoid any criminal implications.

Shady af.

1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-12-13

No about defending POTUS. This is Deep State being exposed. Disregarding the will of the people across the political spectrum in order to appease their Satanic High Priestess.

1 1-800-YoureRetarded 2017-12-13

Trump was a Hollywood figure and an elite. Why isn't he a satanic high priest?

1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-12-13

Even hearsay doesn't exist for that stupid theory.

1 accountingisboring 2017-12-13

Honest question here, how or why did they think to look at this guys texts? What caused them to look at them in the first place? I haven’t seen anything reported on that part of the story.

1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-12-13

I was wondering the same thing. I think it has something to do with the OIG report, but no article I'm reading is sourcing the texts.

1 accountingisboring 2017-12-13

Yeah, I haven’t found anything either.

1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-12-13

http://archive.is/ak5p6

CNN says they came from DOJ

So, OIG, I guess. They're investigation is ongoing so it looks like this is just the start of the Revelations.

1 accountingisboring 2017-12-13

That’s right, I forgot the OIG opened an investigation into the FBI.

1 thebabyseagull 2017-12-13

I heard it was a government audit.