Professor at University of Michigan works all summer uncovering missing trillions. Makes phone calls to the OIG (Office of Inspector General). Shortly thereafter, links to the information the professor was accessing are disabled.

185  2017-12-16 by AIsuicide

Edit: My apologies, it's Michigan State University not University of Michigan. Also, here is a link to the documents the professor and his students archived and published. Look under "Key Documents/DoD & HUD in navigation bar center of page.

https://missingmoney.solari.com/

Now if you've watched the video - https://youtu.be/7CwpjIwwI9o it is apparent that the DoD and the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs figure prominently in the trail of missing money.

Two important lists we should be aware of:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_Committee_on_Armed_Services

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_Committee_on_Banking,_Housing,_and_Urban_Affairs

Questions that need to be answered:

When specifically, did the professor start making phone calls to the OIG?

Edit - This may help in establishing a timeline at some point: On October 5, 2017 we discovered that the link to the report “Army General Fund Adjustments Not Adequately Documented or Supported” had been disabled. Within a several days, the links to other OIG documents we identified in our search were also disabled.

Was Senator McCain made aware of his inquiries, and if so..when?

Was Senator Bob Corker made aware of the inquiries, and if so..when?

Edit: Another important question - Who directed who to disable the links to the information?

Something for you Q enthusiasts to think about:

Future proves the past...News is the map...Follow the money...What is the swamp? A place where things get "mired".

Catherine Austin Fitts video: https://youtu.be/qgI914jTzBA published on July 18, 2017.

Stories about John McCain's health show up July 19, 2017

This video - https://youtu.be/7CwpjIwwI9o gets published December 2, 2017 but doesn't start gaining traction until a week later...

And now...John McCain is back in the hospital and looking "very frail".

Senator Corker announced in September (end of summer) that he would not seek reelection. He's on the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee.

There's alot of work to be done as far as comparing the list of officials who have announced they won't be running again against the list of oversight committees involved in the majority of the "bookkeeping anomalies".

I'll be working on it...and I'm sure others already are or will be soon enough.

Will the Federal Reserve finally be audited now? I'm thinking it will have to be, considering where the "incoming money" in these anomalies came from.

Hmmm...seems that some people at the Federal Reserve are retiring also.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/06/news/economy/fed-leaders-retiring/index.html

Very convenient timing on these announcements also.

31 comments

1  GotCancerYet 2017-12-16

MSU fool

1  AIsuicide 2017-12-16

Oh..thanks for the clarification. Don't think the last part was necessary.

1  Aye_or_Nay 2017-12-16

Sounds like criminal obfuscation to me.

1  AIsuicide 2017-12-16

How would one go about this? Would the audits have to take place first? Or could a parallel investigation begin, in order to get key individuals testimonies "before" they have information that would aid them in avoiding prosecution?

Also, will it be a significant factor if key officials "retire" before investigations begin?

1  Aye_or_Nay 2017-12-16

I was speaking of the clear spirit of the law, in that were there an active investigation by a sanctioned regulatory or judicial body, and an agency spoliated data, that would be criminal and actionable.

Regardless, this is a clear indication that they don't want people looking behind the curtain.

1  twsmith 2017-12-16

The links were broken because the web site was reorganized.

For example, the report at the old URL

http://www.dodig.mil/pubs/report_summary.cfm?id=7034

is now available at

http://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/Article/1119298/army-general-fund-adjustments-not-adequately-documented-or-supported/

All the reports can be found at http://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/

It doesn't give me a whole lot of confidence in Professor Skidmore that he wasn't able to figure that out.

1  AIsuicide 2017-12-16

On October 5, 2017 we discovered that the link to the report They've already addressed this on their website -

“Army General Fund Adjustments Not Adequately Documented or Supported” had been disabled. Within a several days, the links to other OIG documents we identified in our search were also disabled. The sequential non-random nature of this disabling process suggests a purposeful decision on the part of OIG to make key documents unavailable to the public via the website, as opposed to website reorganization, etc. We also revisited the website intermittently to see whether the documents had been reposted under different URLs—until very recently they had not been reposted.

On December 11, 2017, we learned that key documents had been reposted on the OIG website, but with different URLs. Documents now appear to be reposted on new URLs. As we find the new URLs we are adding them in the footnotes entitled “new link” next to the original link.

1  twsmith 2017-12-16

Yeah, December 11 was when I emailed him. Hopefully he'll also realize that the sum of accounting entries does not, in general, yield a meaningful number.

1  AIsuicide 2017-12-16

You sound knowledgeable on the subject. I have a question. How does the Army get a transfer of funds from the Treasury that far exceeds it's budget?

1  TheMidNightStoner 2017-12-16

It happens all the time If I'm a brigade commander Ill request far more than needed for training purposes and next fiscal year big army assumes I need the same amount for training exercises or whatever, I would be a fool to turn funds away from my brigade because they will then allocate the funds to another brigade. So brigades and divisions sit on funds. Glad their is an audit going on its well needed.

1  AIsuicide 2017-12-16

This is what I'm referring to specifically..sorry for format. Anyways, it's on page 8 of 2010 Army column report..just look for the many many billions as you scroll down...can't miss it.

Inadequately Supported and Reported Electronic Error Correction and Transaction Analysis Adjustments DFAS Indianapolis personnel did not maintain sufficient documentation to adequately support or report to DoD management $713.9 billion of ELECTRA adjustments prepared for March 2010. Inadequately Supported Adjustments DFAS Indianapolis personnel did not have adequate support for 256,359 ELECTRA adjustments totaling $713.9 billion recorded in DDRS-B for March 2010. DFAS Indianapolis personnel made the adjustments to correct the ELECTRA table of abnormal balances (TAB) errors, DDRS-B edit table errors, and several other types of errors. See Table 1 for types and amounts of March 2010 adjustments. Table 1. March 2010 DDRS-B ELECTRA Adjustments ($ in billions) Error Type TAB Edit Table Other Total Number 238,363 14,967 3,029 256,359 Errors Percentage of Total Amount (billions) 93.0 $648.8 5.8 53.8 1.2 11.3 100.0 $713.9 Percentage of Total 90.9 7.5 1.6 100.0 TAB errors are abnormal conditions the ELECTRA application identifies using formulas that establish expected relationships between RDT records in the feeder files. For example, an abnormal condition exists when the RDT amount for the annual funding program is less than the RDT amount for funds received. The application generates a TAB error report that lists RDT records not matching these formulas. DFAS Indianapolis personnel were unable to provide us with a March 2010 ELECTRA TAB error report or any other documentation supporting the 256,359 ELECTRA adjustments. DFAS Indianapolis personnel explained that when they correct transactions, the application overlays the erroneous records with the corrected records; and, as a result, the March 2010 ELECTRA TAB error report has no data. The support for ELECTRA adjustments should be maintained to comply with DoD FMR, volume 6A, chapter 2, documentation requirements. ELECTRA error correction adjustments are included in ELECTRA output files loaded into DDRS-B. ELECTRA adjustments affect amounts reported on DDRS-B budget execution reports and in the export file. For example, the $3.7 billion reported on the March 2010 Army SF 133 for FY 2009 Operation and Maintenance, Obligations Incurred – Category A, included $66 billion (absolute value) or a net value of $125 million in ELECTRA adjustments. However, there was no audit trail because the ELECTRA TAB error report no longer contained data and DFAS Indianapolis personnel

1  Aye_or_Nay 2017-12-16

Yes, and I hear...those damn crickets.

You pose an excellent question.

No answer from the fraud, waste and abuse apologist. Gee, imagine that.

1  Aye_or_Nay 2017-12-16

That's not what is happening. They are using baseline budgeting and spending every dime so they don't get cut next year.

If they were "sitting on funds" there would be an entry to reflect a positive balance.

Or is there yet another form of accounting wherein the bottom line is arbitrary?

Is this the part where some stooge gets called in front of a Senate committee and answers, "...we are still looking into that..."?

Baloney.

1  TheMidNightStoner 2017-12-16

They sit on the funds, S-3 or whoever is in control of the books will make the money look like its spent. If you don't spend the money or "use it" more than likely won't get it back next fiscal year.

Ive seen millions of dollars spent on a "training" exercise that consisted of setting up tents so a General and the COL can fly over via chopper and give a thumbs up.

Just to say the money was "spent" If the unit turned away the funds or didn't spend it on "training" next fiscal year they would be cut off from funds.

its a broken system

1  Aye_or_Nay 2017-12-16

What portion of even a preliminary accounting of an out of control budget is not yielding, "...a meaningful number"

Poppycock.

1  twsmith 2017-12-16

What portion of even a preliminary accounting of an out of control budget is not yielding, "...a meaningful number"

Try looking at any set of accounts and pick 10% of the transactions. Add the amounts together. What does that number mean?

Or look at your checking account statement. You have a deposit for $2,200, and you remember it's your paycheck plus some other check you had and deposited, but you can't remember what it is.

Also, there's check 389 for $150.57, but you didn't write down in the register what it was.

So there's two "inadequately documented accounting entries". If you add them together, you get $2,350.57. What does that number mean? Or you could subtract them, and get $2,049.43. Does that number mean something?

Also, you decide to start a new checkbook register with the new year. You copy over your balance of $7,423.19. But you throw away the old register. So now the entry where you wrote the balance is an "inadequately documented accounting entry".

So now you add that to the $2,049.43. You get $9,472.62. Does that number mean something? Clearly not, because the balance we copied forward already included those transactions.

If you have N accounting entries (on many different accounts), there are 2N different ways of adding them together (not even counting the sign). Almost none of those ways gives a meaningful number.

Am I just being silly? No, that's how you get numbers like $2.3 trillion when the entire budget is only a fraction of that.

Specifically, in the $2.3 trillion that was being discussed in the year 2001, $1.4 trillion of that came from the Navy copying numbers from a Marine report onto their own report.

Each month they copied entries that included how much money the Marine Corps was appropriated by Congress for the whole year, and the total amount that the Marine Corps, and how much the Marine Corps had already spent, and how much the Marine Corps planned to spend for the rest of the year, etc. The total came to more than 4 times the Marine Corps budget. Then, each month, they reversed those entries. That's now 8 times the Marine Corps budget. Then they did that same thing for each of the 12 months. That's 12 × 8 = 96 times the annual budget. In fact, the total in "inadequately documented accounting entries" was, just for this alone, more than 100 times the Marines Corps' annual budget.

1  Aye_or_Nay 2017-12-16

I really do see your point.

What I should have said was that even if the methodology of deriving a sum was faulty, the resultant number has meaning.

It means the books are wrong. That in itself is a meaningful conclusion supported by the sum X.

I realize I am no accountant, but I do not write checks and then in the interim between their generation and their posting, consider an ATM balance as an accurate accounting of my balance (which I have seen people do....)

Why are tax dollars being allocated to DOD accountants, if they cannot balance a ledger?

Thanks for your concise, thoughtful reply.

1  Aye_or_Nay 2017-12-16

Yes, the trail of discovery is not relevant. It's the discovery and the money.

Everything else is people magazine shit.

1  Aye_or_Nay 2017-12-16

I am under the impression that the "headline" is making the connection that there is direct correlation between discovery and obfuscation, not that the professor is a nitwit.

The real question is about the money. Not the investigation.

It's always about the money or power. The MSM and politicians want to make it about blame or sex.

I am neither amused nor aroused by headlines....not since Kennedy left that girl, in the car - to drown, and got away with it.

1  martini-meow 2017-12-16

Did he archive.is any of it?? Sigh!

1  AIsuicide 2017-12-16

The professor and his graduate students downloaded everything and published it for public viewing at (not sure of spelling, he mentions it in video) Solaris?

1  martini-meow 2017-12-16

Your other comment reply to me here is shadowbanned.

/u/mastigia could it be shown? (Tagging you because I can spell your username off the top of my head 😁 I often link to your post on flat earth data!)

1  mastigia 2017-12-16

Not seeing another comment here. Only removed comment is the totesmessengerbot one.

totes comment

This comment tree

1  AIsuicide 2017-12-16

Found it - https://missingmoney.solari.com/

1  martini-meow 2017-12-16

oh excellent!

1  martini-meow 2017-12-16

Earlier AI's comment above was hidden (even earlier it was visible to a few who upvoted) .. Do you see it here, /u/mastigia ?

1  mastigia 2017-12-16

I'm going to test the link by replying to you to see if automod eats it.

1  martini-meow 2017-12-16

Totes fruity! 🍍🍇🍒🍌🍐🍎🍓🍬🍭

1  mastigia 2017-12-16

Test

Found it - https://missingmoney.solari.com/ look under "Key Documents" in the navigation bar.

1  martini-meow 2017-12-16

thanks!

1  DancingPhantoms 2017-12-16

Anyone get the odd feeling that they were hoarding money in attempts to ride the wave that might be the incoming collapse of the dollar or something?

1  AIsuicide 2017-12-16

Oh..thanks for the clarification. Don't think the last part was necessary.