Free Energy Exists
91 2017-12-23 by IAMN30
Did you know that there is no money in free energy?
Its true.
I am here today, truthfully and astoundingly, typing next to a device that makes clean energy and does so for periods of time that are unknown. It could be a year, it could be millennia. The things I am powering with it are more likely to quit working before the power source does.
And guess what... I am not getting any richer.
Why? Well for one reason, the majority of people simply do not believe free, unlimited clean energy is possible.
The majority of people cling to the idea that we have all been indoctrinated into believing.
That this type of technology is only available in comic books and movies... Iron man, Star Wars, etc.
We are all led to believe that burning black rocks and black goo that is poisonous to our bodies is absolutely the best way to create energy.
But in reality, our Earth provides us with enough energy for all of humanity WITHOUT burning poison and releasing it into our air so that we can inhale our wonderful concoction of indoctrination.
Crystals are the answer.
Have you ever heard of a crystal radio?
It does not require any power source to operate, and one may listen to radio frequencies of your choice through an earpiece.
It receives all the energy it needs through the radio waves it tunes in on.
So I wonder where Nikolai Tesla got his idea for a system to send electricity wirelessly?
Of course I would just like to remind you that this idea was thought up in the 1800s. THE EIGHTEEN-HUNDREDS.
Its now 2017 and inventors these days are putting Ipads on baby training toilets
We are being dumbed down.
It may seem like technology has become more advanced, but has it really? Does a bigger flatter TV that beams more photons into your eyeballs really mean technology is better than it was almost 100 years ago? TVs do the same thing now as they did back then.
(yes the world renowned TELL-YOU-VISION is about 90 years old now.)
Anyways I digress.
Crystals have an electrical output.
Try it if you don't believe me. Buy some epsom salt for 2.99 or whatever it is near you. Then heat up a half cup of water. Pour it into a container that can fit in your fridge. Then mix in a half cup of epsom salt. Mix it well, and let it sit in your fridge for a few hours, or overnight, or whatever the heck you want, just wait until some crystals form. Then grab a crystal, wrap some copper wire on it, then stick one lead of a multimeter on the copper wire and the other on the crystal.
Woah! Hey! There is electrical output!
Where is that energy coming from?
Honestly I am not sure. I doubt any of us regular folk really know for sure. Mostly because for the last few hundred years we have been slowly but surely led into stupidity by the governments of the world.
Yes, yes I know, such a huge conspiracy cannot possibly exist because someone would have spoken out by now blah blah blah.
Dont kid yourself. People have been speaking out about this for a long time and the fact is ... no one wants to listen.
Thats the truth and you know it.
So anyways, here is a quick video from 1958 about crystals
Watch it, its very informative.
Everything that is solid in our world is actually a crystal.
Anything that has a shape or a structure, is formed by them.
So is it really that surprising crystals are the key to clean, free energy?
If you find this intriguing, I urge you to research John K Hutchisons crystal power cells. I am actually unsure wether or not he created them on his own, or if there are others that should be getting credit as well, but he seems very knowledgeable about them, as crazy as he is now a days.
I made my cells in an afternoon, using 99 cent half inch copper pipe end caps and some machine bolts I had laying around.
I mixed one tablespoon each of epsom salts, borax, alum, and potassium chloride together and ground them into a very fine powder, poured it into the copper end cap, heated it on a hot plate, and once it liquified, I placed in the machine bolt, with the head on the bottom and let it cool.
Also, prior to filling the copper end cap with the mixture I cut out a piece of engine gasket material into a circle and placed it on the inside of the copper pipe cap at the bottom to make sure the bolt did not touch the copper. That is an imperative step in order to ensure there are no short circuits, or else the cell will not produce any electricity.
After the cell cools, test it with a multimeter! Wait until it is nice and solid. There will be an electrical charge.
Make some more. Connect them in parallel and series! Power some stuff with it. Its a lot of fun.
However keep in mind, that although these cells are rumored to never run out of electricity, they are not magic. If you hook them up to something that draws more than it creates, it will run down, and stop powering whatever it is you are trying to power.
But if you unplug them, they will regain their charge after a period of time.
Effectively making them a self charging battery.
The key to unlimited perpetual energy is to find a balance between what the cells are producing and what you are powering.
If you are powering something that consumes less energy than the cells are producing, then bam, you have tapped an unlimited power source.
At the current moment, my cells are not creating much amperage. I can only power four white LEDs indefinitely.
Here is a video that walks you through the process of creating these cells
Although this guy uses much larger copper caps, and a magnesium rod instead of any old metal bolt.
Different cell materials, cell sizes, mixture proportions, mixture materials and a multitude of other variables all come in to play when calculating what kind of power these cells produce.
This is not exactly the kind of technology that you can walk down to your local library and read up on the best way to create them.
I think this is technology has been in the hands of the people involved in what we call "organized government" for a looooong time.
We are all living in a self defeating slavery system in which we destroy homes, our bodies, and our lives because we are told to do so.
"Burn that coal, build that radioactive power station, spend a zillion dollars on wind and solar!" - Your government
So I will continue to spread my knowledge of the truth, and meanwhile I am sure there will be plenty of silly comments on here about how these crystal cells are fake, or that they are nothing more than a regular galvanic battery, and how its all a hoax.
But while those comments are being typed, my little cells will being pumping out voltage and amperage, day after day, year after year, without any gas or coal or wind or sun. Little crystal cells, easily stored underground, easily wired into a grid, easily accessible to homes up and down your street, in order to power your radios and TVs so you can listen to the government tell you that there is an energy crisis, and there are oil wars, and that your taxes went up and that you need to pay for their services.
Free Energy Exists.
244 comments
58 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
This is actually hilarious. Thanks for the laugh dude. It's really fascinating that a guy can build a simple electrochemical cell, only capable of powering a 2 watt bulb, and believe he has broken the third law of thermodynamics.
What's more disappointing is that hundreds of people actually believe you. I hope you understand that finding a way of counteracting entropy would be the greatest achievement in human history, by a long shot. Are you really arrogant enough to believe that you have done it yourself with copper wiring and a cell you shoddily crafted?
Jesus Christ dude. I'd love to see you attempt to power a TV with that.
12 hohothenaughtyelf 2017-12-23
It baffles me this post has so many upvotes. The general population of this sub should maybe work on their critical thinking skills
8 lunaticLipid 2017-12-23
Some people come here to read about funny crazy theories
10 fickfilmchenkonto 2017-12-23
I thought this whole sub was just an offshoot of r/writingprompts
3 takethescrew 2017-12-23
I spend a lot of time lurking here, but I view everything that is posted as "alternative timeline fiction". It's entertaining, but ~90% of submissions are entirely lacking in scientific or critical analysis.
1 Bond4141 2017-12-23
90%is generous.
Most "conspiracies" lack a motive on this sub.
3 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
The motive is easy enough to find in many cases, it's the reasoning and cognition that's elusive.
2 Bond4141 2017-12-23
I'm talking like, flat earth and stuff like that. Conspiracies that make no sense from day one.
2 heavyheavylowlowz 2017-12-23
The motive is their insecurities in themselves
2 ItsAMeEric 2017-12-23
I feel like a lot of people here just read the title of the post and upvote without reading the content. "Free energy exists"... upvote. Because I see so many posts like this where the title is reasonable but then the argument made is ridiculous and all the comments made are pointing out the flaws in the arguments made by the poster, but it still has hundreds of upvotes. Or it could just be that people will upvote anything that goes against the mainstream narrative even if there is no logic behind it.
1 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
"Free energy exists" doesn't really mean anything as a stand-alone. Free in what sense? Money? Time? Effort? I might get free energy if I'm 16 years old and my parents pay the electricity bill, but that doesn't mean that there is a device out there that can harvest energy in perpetuity.
-3 FUCK_the_Clintons__ 2017-12-23
It wouldn't have been upvoted by genuine /r/conspiracy regulars, shit like this gets upvoted by the idiots over on /r/topmindsofreddit for them to circlejerk how stupid we all are
13 The_Last_Mammoth 2017-12-23
/r/conspiracy users can't possibly be upvoting something dumb. It has to be some sort of conspiracy!
6 liamemsa 2017-12-23
Glad someone else is sane. A cursory understanding of Physics proves all of this is total bullshit.
Newsflash, OP, you're not in a closed thermodynamic system. The Earth regularly gets a tremendous amount of energy and radiation from, namely, the fucking Sun.
I don't have the time to break down your entire rambling mess, but I can just address the first point that got you off and running.
A crystal radio is powered from radio waves. Yeah, so, it takes energy from radiation. That's not free energy. That radio wave is generated by another source, whether it's natural or artificial. But the major point here is that something had to fucking generate that wave. And whatever generated that wave used energy.
3 jon_knutton 2017-12-23
This particular method isnt very efficient but he has a point. There are many ways we can produce electricity with far less resources than we are currently with better life than current available technology. I take this as the point of the post. To question our dependency on fossil fuels and why.
15 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
The fuck are you talking about? There are numerous ways to utilize the potential energy contained in the ingredients he used that would be more efficient. We have known about this for hundreds or years. /u/IAMN30 being the pseudo hack he is, believes that he himself discovered it.
If you actually took a high school chemistry class, you would be aware that all elements and compounds can be manipulated to become a solid, gas vapour, and sometimes many more in between. This can be done by manipulating temperature and pressure. I hope this spells out why a statement like "all solids are crystals" is just dumb. No, they're not.
Please take your energy and apply it to something that will help yourself, and society. If you actually want to learn something, this is part of the chem class you apparently skipped.
https://youtu.be/-bxJXt_69yM
-5 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I never claimed to have invented this on my own.
4 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
So then I don't understand. What was your resource that showed you how to make this? How exactly was the idea of this being perpetual energy put into your head? And what made you think nobody understands it?
-14 jon_knutton 2017-12-23
You must be fun at parties... Theyre proud of what they've built, lay off the supremacy complex and let them have their moment.
And yes, I'm quite aware of piezoelectricity and basic Chemistry, thanks for your concern though.
5 heavyheavylowlowz 2017-12-23
Their moment in what? Lighting up a 2 way bulb with what amounts to a highschool science project, but still not understanding the experiment enough to recognize its limitations? OP should not be spreading this because there are many people like him who will use this as evidence in their minds to perpetuate this uneducated notion.
-1 jon_knutton 2017-12-23
And there are many more that will test it out, see it's limitations and be inspired to keep searching. We learnt so much more when science was still synonymous with romance.
0 _IDontLikeThings_ 2017-12-23
Except that romance is an emotional concept, whereas science is entirely dependant upon us disregarding our immediate emotional response to something, and thusly must only be performed logically and rationally; without emotion.
That doesn't mean that science can't make you feel a certain way, but to say that science and romance are, were, or even should be synonymous is simply asinine.
1 jon_knutton 2017-12-23
I think you've misunderstood. What I'm saying is we've reached a point where we no longer do shit just to see what happens. That's the romance. It's the thrill of discovery. We used to be explorers and dreamers but now we're just tinkerers.
1 heavyheavylowlowz 2017-12-23
That was when most of our understanding of our world was based on best assumptions. We were starting from scratch.
Early in our scientific advancement, there was more room to "explore" all possible avenues of a Scientific Law through forming Hypothesis and creating Experiments that created Empirical Data until we experimented enough where we got conclusive applicable results that explained said phenomenon; which is a Theory.
Thermodynamics is a Scientific Law. What OP is saying is not that the Theory, Hypothesis, Empirical Data, or Experiments regarding Energy are wrong or have been hijacked, but the very observable nature of the world itself is wrong.
What you are saying is Science was great in the Renaissance because humans observed Scientific Law, and then had the wide berth and un-pioneered path ahead of them to look at many Hypotheses, Experiments, gather Empirical Data, and then form a Theory, because none of which existed.
Yes a Theory can be overturned in the future, and that is fine, in-fact, that is good Science! And I think this is what you are alluding too. Trying new ways to explain something just to try it, even if it goes against conventional wisdom and the consensus of truth. And it does happen, ALL THE TIME.
What OP is saying is that the Scientific Law is incorrect, not the Theory.
To circle back to the beginning of my comment, a Scientific Law is just an observation of reality that is true every time, no matter what.
A Hypothesis is a limited explanation of why that Scientific Law occurs in the natural world.
An Experiment is conducted based off that Hypothesis, and through which, Empirical Data is collected, which eventually either force the Hypothesis to be adjusted, chucked out the window or verified.
Once enough Empirical Data is collected, and it is seen that the Empirical Data from multiple different Hypothesis that explain DIFFERENT THINGS can all be explained by one axiom, that is a Theory.
They don't graduate from one to another, Prediction->Hypothesis->Theory->Law like most people are taught in school. They are all separate parts of the Scientific Method, which all try to Explain the Scientific Law, which is not an explanation, but just a undeniable observation of how the world works, and a Theory is really just a higher order Hypothesis that connects multiple other Hypothesis together, until something comes along and proves it otherwise.
So again, saying that "Free Energy" does exist is saying the Scientific Law is wrong, which is pretty hard to do because, again, a Scientific Law is an undeniable and verifiable observation of our natural world. The Theories that explain Thermodynamics can change, but not the Law of Thermodynamics.
This is why Gravity is a Theory and not a Law, because its observable, undeniable, and verifiable, but we only have a Theory to EXPLAIN how it works. OP is not trying to explain how "Free Energy" could exist, he is saying that is does and it is a Scientific Law, we just don't have a Theory for it yet...
Which is kinda like me saying Ghost are Scientific Law, I just have no Theory explaining them yet, or a Hypothesis of why I perhaps did see one. But I have an Experiment that shows one on a projector screen, saying "look, see, its a ghost, and you can replicate this too in your own experiments at home!"
But when the accepted Theory is presented to me that explains that the projected imagine is just that, a projection, and not an actual Ghost, I just say, "well, The Law is Wrong!"
1 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
I think the larger problem here is people like OP believe they have created something novel, while not being educated enough to understand what they are attempting to disprove. The burden of proof is on the one who makes the claims (aka Newton), but the pseudo proof has already been tested for hundreds of years. If you wish to participate in the scientific community- that is great. If you do, you should subject yourself to high standards and understand the well explored and documented principles that we use today.
-3 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Exactly. I only made these to test if they even worked at all, not to make something to meet all of my power needs Note the ridiculously lazy wiring and E-tape So far so good, but I will keep testing different mixtures and build methods to optimize the output before I wire them in to my electrical panel where I live.
-2 jon_knutton 2017-12-23
Piezoelectric is actually used somewhat in technology these days but only for tiny applications like clocks and sensors. It'd be interesting to see if it could be used at a larger scale.
Tesla allegedly found a way to collect energy from the atmosphere and use it. I think it ties into how those plasma globes work but in reverse. The idea is that solar radiation is constantly flowing through our atmosphere so there is always electromagnetic energy at the surface too. If you create a point of high voltage on Earth this energy will accumulate to that point. The earth acts as a sort of battery for this energy, hence the magnetosphere.
There's stories about huge lightning like arcs hitting the tower/transformer he built before the projects funding stopped.
-1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Here it is, Teslas idea made into a reality
2 jon_knutton 2017-12-23
It makes me sad knowing these guys will be bought out and the idea will be hidden once they get anywhere in business.
2 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
I actually really like this idea. It has a ton of ground to cover before being capable of powering anything though. First of all, the guy in the video either misunderstands power, or doesn't want to point out the gaping hole in the system. Power is not a product of converting volts to watts as time passes like joules do. Unit analysis states that power is amps*volts. The fact that this guy misrepresents the basic unit of power is a reason to take what he says with a grain of salt. He likely does but this because, while his voltage values are impressive, as you increase in altitude and voltage, the atmospheric density decreases, along with the current. Since we have high voltage but low amperes, your power output won't be competitive.
Beyond that, he is clearly trying to cash out on this idea by making a quick buck. Graphene is not the most fascinating modern materials. Carbon nanotubes are literally changing the way we understand phases. This was a big topic of discussion when I took my first fluids class. If you actually wanna do some reading on cutting edge science- read about what happens when water is put inside these nanotubes. Like stated before, pressure and temperature can control the phase of a solid. We can predict what phase a compound will be at a set T and P very precisely. However, for some reason, inside a nanotube, water freezes when it should be boiling. We have no idea why as of yet. By utilizing this, we can potentially make the best conductors in history.
1 crestind 2017-12-23
Man, like clockwork. /r/conspiracy is basically like ATS now. Someone posts an entirely possible claim, first reply hits within an hour and it's invariably ridicule.
I wish I had a cushy gubmint job in Chair Force. Nothing wrong with enslaving humanity for that gubmint gibs the rest of my life. Totally worth selling out all other people for that.
1 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
Not really sure what you are trying to project on me. Are you agreeing with OP?
1 Boneasaurus 2017-12-23
This post is proof that science is dead in this country, and that people's own idiot thoughts are perceived to be more credible than scientists'.
1 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
Science isn't dead, it's just ignored by many people. The internet allows stupid people to feel smart by letting them connect with other uneducated people.
-1 RomanWillNeverReign 2017-12-23
Evidence that 'hundreds of people' believe him?
2 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
Hundreds of upvotes?
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
That proves nothing.
1 dfslkjbnltalrvlxdguh 2017-12-23
The only 'proofs' you get are in maths. The word you're looking for is evidence. And there is a lot of evidence.
-4 IAMN30 2017-12-23
With capacitors, smaller more efficient cells with better materials, rochelle salts, ground quartz and inverter, I could power a TV.
But I do not own a TV.
I am thinking of building a laser though. Maybe one powerful enough to burn through wood.
Wouldnt that be cool, a laser gun powered by crystals that has unlimited energy... kind like something I have hear before...
11 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
https://youtu.be/-bxJXt_69yM
It kinda blows my mind that you have the audacity to pretend like you came up with this idea on your own. You made an electrochemical cell. A weak one at that.
Yes, you could make them power something more powerful. Have you ever see the experiment done with potatoes that power a clock? It utilizes the same property of matter (hint: it's the very same property that you claim to have disproven).
Some other highlights of stupidity in this post include contradicting the conservation of energy, claiming nobody knows where energy comes from in a reaction that involves oxidation, and believing that this cell has no waste products.
-2 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Potatoes will deteriorate very quickly and you are left with no power.
The crystals will last a looooooong time.
I never claimed to have invented these.
5 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
The crystals will last a long time because you used more powerful oxidizing and reducing agents. The point of the potato reference is that it is a weaker and more renewable resource that has been used to power more that your battery was capable of.
Have you ever seen rust on a car? That is the slow process of a valuable anode like copper losing its high electrochemical potential. Deposition in cells like these occur in days, and happen faster if you demand more of them.
-4 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Woah there, are you arguing that potatoes are a better source of energy than these crystals?
I suggest a side by side comparison of power output and longevity.
8 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
? Did you bother reading the comment? "Potatoes are a weaker, and more renewable resource"
-2 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I read it. It made little sense to me. How are potatoes more renewable?
8 Rob_V 2017-12-23
No shit
-1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I know, that quote is just inane babble isn't it.
4 Rob_V 2017-12-23
No, actually what I meant was that you don't seem to have a grasp on how these phenomena work at all.
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
So build one and tell me exactly how it works.
Or are you ok with speculation and pretending you are the master of knowledge.
I do not claim to know how they operate.
3 Rob_V 2017-12-23
Man, I learned that shit in 8th grade. Seriously, it's pretty simple chemistry. Shit, grab some pennies and nickels and stack them in alternating order with pieces of napkins soaked with lemon juice in between each pair of coins. I'm pretty sure that one will blow your mind. You have now mastered the obscure arts of basic chemistry.
-1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Did you also form crystals and use them to power things for years in the 8th grade?
4 Rob_V 2017-12-23
Nah, that was actually in a chemistry set booklet I got when I was like 10. Bro, for real, it's pretty basic shit. I'm not going to explain it to you, but if you're interested just do your research. Also, I'm pretty sure you haven't thought of the environmental implications of large-scale use of your miracle energy source, have you?
Sorry if I'm being harsh, but people on this sub really need to question and understand the phenomena in front of us before jumping to batshit conclusions.
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
So where do the crystals get their electrical power? You seem to know so much about them! Even that a large scale version would be detrimental to Earth!? How do you know that? Ill ask again as I did a few comments ago...
Tell me exactly how they work.
2 Rob_V 2017-12-23
The production of magnesium (which is present in your mystery energy crystals) is not clean at all. Extraction of mineral resources has a huge environmental impact. I recently finished a year-long project where I developed an organic material which adsorbs airborne pollutants. During that project, I did extensive research on different sources of pollution. I know my shit.
As to how it works, it's just a dry cell ffs. Google that shit, man, I'm not going to waste time trying to educate every stubborn idiot on the internet. Refining metal is an energy-intensive process. You're releasing this energy while the copper is corroding as a product of the electrochemical reaction that's making the electricity.
If you're an adult you should be ashamed of not understanding basic science.
Edit: I can't believe I'm taking time off my work to teach you elementary school-level shit.
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Can you at least recognize that even if it is a chemical process, the process is so slow and efficient that the corrosion is basically non existent? Or are you so smart that you would rather ignore that as a possibility?
4 Rob_V 2017-12-23
It's slow because you're barely drawing any current from it.
3 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
How are potatoes more renewable? They are more renewable than say- copper because they can be produced at a rate that exceeds the demand by natural processes with a lower energy requirement.
Copper is a renewable resource nowadays, because its primary application utilizes its thermoconductivity. This is very different from oxidizing copper. Recycling oxidized copper requires far more energy, reducing its renewability.
2 dfslkjbnltalrvlxdguh 2017-12-23
Source? Yes. The potatoes have energy in them. The crystals dont. They just leech it off a radio transmitter.
So yeah, potatoes are a better source of energy on account of them being a source at all, whilst the crystals arent.
25 LordBacon69 2017-12-23
It's coming from the radio wave.
You have free (and, honestly, ridiculously easy) access to thousands of sources that would have taught you exactly how crystal radios work. Yet you've read none of them. The only person dumbing you down is you. I learned how crystal radios work when I was 9.
-14 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Are you sure its coming from a radio wave? That would conflict with most of the nasty comments on here screaming that it might just be a galvanic cell and is nothing new.
18 kalestew 2017-12-23
The radio and the cell are two different things.
4 uusu 2017-12-23
Yes, radio waves are a form of electromagnetic energy. The sound is created by alternating the energy levels.
So let's say you want to move something elastic, maybe the band of a slingshot, by a certain amount. You pull it with your fingers and stretch it. YOU are the energy source here. That energy is carried from your muscles to the band.
Similarly, the radio tower is the energy source for the audio information. The energy is carried by the electromagnetic waves, radio waves. Just like you pull the elastic band of the slingshot with your hand, the electromagnetic waves pull the little speakers of your headphones.
But the energy to pull the speakers itself is still coming from the radio tower. It is not created out of nothing.
24 benjamindees 2017-12-23
Sounds like you're making a magnesium battery.
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Anything I say gets down voted. Whatever these cells are they are one of the keys to energy independence and freedom from the elite.
-6 IAMN30 2017-12-23
It would be nice if I had magnesium but I just used some machine bolts.
If these crystals last for years and years, and just keep going and going, why are they not in use?
Why dont our devices simply have crystals built to supply them with the power they require to operate?
13 Rob_V 2017-12-23
Epsom salts are magnesium sulfate.
-5 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Yes I know, a magnesium anode rod makes a better core than the machine bolt, however.
12 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Because they're shit. They can only hold tiny amounts of power compared to actual effective batteries, like Lithium Ion ones.
-5 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Sure the ones I made in an afternoon from Home Depot supplies do not have much output, but if I had access to the resources that the government does I could make one that is comparable to a Li-Ion one. But where is the money in that? Why would a company make something that only needs to be bought once? Where is the control? Where is the slavery and dependency?
22 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
No you couldn't. You're assuming you could, but you couldn't.
You're assuming you couldn't sell it yourself and tell everyone else to fuck off. If it was made in the 19th century it's in the public domain and they can't stop you. Face it, you're making erroneous assumptions because you literally never bothered to spend 30 minutes in a real library reading physics textbooks because you couldn't imagine yourself being wrong. It had to be the evil governments fault. Not yours, never yours.
-9 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I recognize the failures that I make in life, but coercing people into thinking that unlimited clean renewable energy is against the "laws" of science was not my doing.
12 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Well it is, because you just did it. Because you were too lazy and arrogant to consider for a measly 5 seconds, when you could have done a google search, that you were wrong. You are part of the problem with misinformation in this country.
-12 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I am not wrong, clean virtually unlimited energy is a reality.
18 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Bull-Fucking-Shit. Tell me where the energy is coming from, nothing comes from nothing. Better yet, tell me how it is generated, what magical process creates it? Hell, tell me where you fifty year study is where you place a crystal in an isolated (IE from solar radiation, radio waves, water whatever) and it continually releases energy. Did you make sure to drain the crystal of all possible sources of energy beforehand?
Science is difficult! It is exact and it's been thought about a hell of a lot more than you think you have. Overturning a millennium of scientific thought that no one has ever thought of before is not easy. Solving all the world's problems is not easy. People work at problems like these for decades and come up with nothing. Either test your theories in a fucking suitable environment, with rigorous procedures, or stop fucking misinforming our already woefully under informed populace about science and energy. We get enough of that shit from the "clean coal" people.
-1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I dont know. If you had bothered to actually read my post you would know that.
5 OBabyJesus 2017-12-23
So let me just be clear about what you are saying.
Free energy exists.
You don't know how it functions or is produced.
Your one experiment doesn't actually prove it's existence because as others point out it's just a magnesium battery.
Soooo in conclusion we're basically left with "free energy exists", "I don't know how it would", and "I have no evidence except other people believe it too"? Am I missing something here or is this basically just a post saying "trust me guys the basic logic that free energy is impossible is wrong!"?
-2 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Prove it is just a magnesium battery.
3 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Okay, this should provide everything you need. Note how they can be activated by water.
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Actually I was showing the crystal cells to a neighbor and they suggested I would get more voltage by placing water in with the crystals and guess what... no change in output at all.
In fact, these cells should be as dry as possible because the crystals are water soluble and stop working if they come in contact with moisture.
3 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Didn't you say you needed to put them in water to prep them?
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
No. Everything should be as dry as possible, water ruins the cells.
2 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Yeah, it's in your thing, you have to pour the water over the salt.
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
No it is not.
2 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Can't even keep your own BS straight.
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Dude, READ. Those are the instructions for growing single epsom salt crystals not the crystal cell formula.
"Then grab a crystal, wrap some copper wire on it, then stick one lead of a multimeter on the copper wire and the other on the crystal."
There is the rest of my quote.
2 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
I'm sorry, so by crystals you mean the one of the crystals vital to it functioning, not the other?
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Epsom salt is an ingredient in the crystal cell compound, yes.
BUT adding water to the compound is not a step in the written explanation of how to create them.
I simply told readers how to create an epsom salt crystal separately and test it for electrical output in case they had any doubts that crystals do indeed have a capacity to carry an electrical charge, and would be able to find out that fact without buying a copper cap, and the rest of the materials needed.
1 amathia_ 2017-12-23
Epsom salt is magnesium.
3 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
So you're saying something with absolutely no way to back it up? With one "experiment" you're further misinforming the populace due to your total lack of comprehension of science, energy, skepticism, and self-awareness?
1 falconsoldier 2017-12-23
Lol, I think it's been made abundantly clear you don't know shit
4 heavyheavylowlowz 2017-12-23
you couldn’t be more wrong
1 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
And yet you've consistently pushed back in this thread when your misapprehensions have been pointed out, even when they've been done so thoughtfully and considerately by extremely knowledgable people.
4 NorahRittle 2017-12-23
Perhaps there haven't been advancements in it to make it comparable to Li-Ion because people who know more about it than you have determined there really aren't any advancements to be made. R&D isn't infinite, you can't will anything into existence by pouring money into it. Sometimes it just isn't there.
1 CrayolaS7 2017-12-23
Li-ion batteries are the advanced version of simple galvanic cells.
-8 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Sometimes it is.
1 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
Because you have more knowledge of energy and thermodynamics than actual electrical engineers?
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
You dont even know who I am or my real name.
1 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
So you have some formal education in electrical engineering then?
5 Pierceus 2017-12-23
Dude they have so little power. Sure I can stick a voltmeter into a potato and measure a few milivolts but the current output would be insanely low.
2 Sanity_in_Moderation 2017-12-23
Salt water over silver and zinc will do it. Long thin conductive cables will convert radio waves into milivolts too.
I suspect there are dozens of simple micro electricity generating setups that would give some result.
1 kevjay17 2017-12-23
Yah and it's nearly impossible to harness. There's is free energy of sorts. If we could harness all the background energy it would power the earth many times over. We just don't have anywhere near the tech to do it well enough
-6 IAMN30 2017-12-23
The prophecy has been fulfilled.
11 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
You understand that preempting criticisms doesn't make them any less valid, right?
3 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
Hahaha I love this thread
24 Compactdrive 2017-12-23
Whoopty doo you've built a battery, did you know that if you get two different metal electrodes, could be a copper penny and a nickel dime, then stick it into a lemon you also get "electricity". This is TOP SECRET don't let the government in on it. They don't know that free energy is right under their noses.
PS I'm not being serious this dude hasn't broken the laws of thermodynamics.
-11 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Except a lemon will break down, its juices will evaporate, and you would need a truck load to power some LEDs for a year.
These crystals do not break down.
Well, actually they do if you let them sit in water, keeping them very dry is important, so I have been considering sealing the tops with a bit of hot wax.
7 Compactdrive 2017-12-23
Bruh... I don't give a shit about the lemons. Are you seriously telling me you've discovered free energy? I mean good on you if you have, but you most likely haven't. I mean if you think this is real, then write to any major stem universities to corroborate and compare your results. If its real you'll probably have thrown out all the known rules of thermodynamics and will probably get a Nobel prize.
2 loli_esports 2017-12-23
He just acted out some episode of bill nye
-1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I did not discover anything, I just built a free energy device from plans given to me.
3 heavyheavylowlowz 2017-12-23
Dude what are you defining as “free energy”?
Free energy refers to perfect creation/conversion of mass to energy without losing anything to entropy. This is not free energy as you are still losing mass. The mass lost is just so small you can’t notice it because there’s such a small amount of energy being released.
If somehow this was scaled up to create the energy needed to power modern life, it would deplete just as fast as any other energy source we currently use.
But if what you are doing you consider “free energy” I don’t see it as any different than nuclear power.
-1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Did you know that nuclear power is basically steam power. How archaic.
6 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Yeah, because it turns out, making new sources of power is actually pretty hard. Good luck with your "magic crystals". I bet they heal the sick too.
14 Asshats_and_Jesus 2017-12-23
Did I miss the link to a photo of the free energy device you said your sitting next to?
11 IAMN30 2017-12-23
https://i.imgur.com/lcBj8Uc.jpg
Its in a little box I am building because its a christmas gift.
There are a lot more cells than necessary because the machine bolts I used are inferior to magnesium but money is tight and pure magnesium is expensive.
15 Vault32 2017-12-23
You say spending zillions on solar: solar is getting much cheaper and tangible- and as long as our sun burns it will give us free energy as we perfect the means to harness it. You yourself have invested more in supplies than makes sense to power a few small LEDs, and admit that the proper materials cost more money, and better results will come with more research and experimentation into the combinations/proportions of said materials. For now you've built maybe the world's most expensive, overly complicated tea light, and I'm not trying to insult you.
(Granted even the sun's light is not infinite, and comes with cost- but the fact is we're bombarded with it daily without having to work for it, so it's 'free' to us in our/it's lifetime)
Don't get me wrong, I think you're onto something- I just think you're not giving solar research the same respect you feel the crystal research deserves.
Besides, when the sun dies, no amount of buried crystal batteries powering a few LEDs will help us.
Beyond all that, I'm not sure what the collage of anti-education, technophobic imagery has to do with what you're saying- which is attempting to educate us on technology. For what it's worth, yeah- giving babies iPads is bad.
-3 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I have a few solar panels, but they need.... sun.
Crystals dont.
When the sun "goes out" generating electricity will be the least of our problems, and until then, winter in some parts of the world makes solar panels useless.
2 Vault32 2017-12-23
Do you know for absolute certain that the crystals alone generate energy, or are they pulling/absorbing/focusing a natural energy from another source? Have you let this led experiment run for even a few years? Because you could get the sane results from a potato or a homemade battery
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I do not know where the energy is coming from.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
So it's not "Free energy" it's "Energy from a place i don't know where but it could run out at literally any time"
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
But it doesnt.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Have you tested this to an extent it could be published as a paper?
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Others have.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Do you.... Have you ever seen a proper scientific paper? Like, they're on google. That's not.... anything.... to hold up to the wider scientific community. It's just a youtube video, man.
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Like this scientific paper describing how all TV screens are really mind control devices?
2 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Okay, learn to fucking read. That's a patent application. This is just getting sad.
-1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Watch your mouth, there are other little kids on here besides you.
Anyone can write a scientific research paper.
2 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
No, they can't. Unless by "Scientific research paper" you mean "random crap that can't hold up to scrutiny, and completely ignores how modern scientists actually publish their findings". There's an actual format, with rigorous trials and standards set. Since you clearly know nothing about any of this, I'm going to assume you're not going to actually look one up? I'm pretty sure I can find a "how-to" guide if you want.
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Yes they can.
2 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Ah, I see we've reached the "I'm not listening lalalalalala same to you" level of discourse. You held out a remarkably long time.
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Mk cupcake, prove me wrong. Oh wait you cant.
2 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
I... I'm pretty sure I already did. You know, because you can't prove your case at all and apparently don't even know what evidence looks like? Are you feeling okay? You seem to be missing large parts of the conversation.
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I am great, never better, I feel like I could fight the new world order.
You on the other hand are digging yourself deeper and deeper into a hole.
Can you define a scientist for me? Lets start there, mr elitist scientific community man.
2 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Okay. Let's start with "can write a scientific paper that won't be rejected because it's made with crayons." Or perhaps "has qualification in a discipline from somewhere that isn't a diploma mill/youtube."
And are you sure, you seem to keep ignoring parts of reality you don't like.
Like there, for instance. Just, ignoring everything that's been said.
7 KiwiBattlerNZ 2017-12-23
That's a lot of batteries to light 4 little LEDs. They don't appear to be very brightly lit, either, suggesting they are drawing very little current.
15 Energizer E91 AA batteries, connected in parallel, will supply about 45,000 mAH of power at 25 mA draw. That equates to around 75 days of continuous output.
To properly judge your device, we need to know what current is being drawn by those LEDs. If they are drawing around 25 mA but remain lit for longer than 75 days, then congratulations, you've made a battery that lasts longer than a good quality AA battery.
However, even if they last for 750 days, you have not created a "free energy" device. Try using one of these batteries to power the hot plate used to make them. If you can't then all you have done is use some of the heat energy from the hot plate to "charge" a dry cell battery.
If it takes more energy to make the battery than the battery can produce, you have lost energy. Therefore, it is not free energy.
1 toastedtobacco 2017-12-23
This post is what I was going for but I'm tired and a bit high. Upvote this guy as this is the best most complete explanation in simple terms without prejudice or malice.
-1 lorenzbrobro 2017-12-23
It's because it's too close to his invisibility cloak
8 blood_n_fire 2017-12-23
How long have you been powering these lights, how much power do they output, and how much energy did you use up making these things? If they truly never run out of charge then that would be surprising.. but unless we know how much power you used to make them, and that the power output exceeds that amount, I’m going to assume you’ve created some kind of interesting battery. Also, things have potential energy and you didn’t start with nothing, you used lots of materials and even heat. So you definitely spent energy making them. Not free energy yet unless we know some numbers
7 psy_raven 2017-12-23
Dude, you do realize it takes tremendous amounts of electricity to broadcast radio waves? All you're doing is leeching some of that energy.
5 stupidfuckingtroll 2017-12-23
Any chance you’d include a video of these cells operating?
5 ehll_oh_ehll 2017-12-23
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biefeld%E2%80%93Brown_effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amplituhedron
https://np.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/7lmk7i/discussion_why_now_the_emergence_of_the/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention_Secrecy_Act
Disclosure is coming
4 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I am fairly sure the idea of aliens from other worlds in space was implanted by those who wished to one day seize control of the free people of Earth through a puppet invasion of a fake new species. Propagating the idea of existence of life on other worlds also eases the knowledge that our current ways of life which destroy the Earth by poisoning the air and soil with dangerous chemicals, radiation, and carcinogens will one day not be a concern, for we can simply move to another spinning ball in space if we totally ruin this one.
4 TheWiredWorld 2017-12-23
I feel so bad for people who think didclosure is coming.
3 ehll_oh_ehll 2017-12-23
Reposting from another user
While the incident is mysterious, it is pretty plainly not a hoax. The Department of Defense has released video of the unidentified object. The USS Princeton observed the UFO on radar, and six Super Hornets—twelve pilots and weapons system operators—saw the objects. (According to FighterSweep.com, which published an account of the incident in 2015, a seventh aircraft, a Marine F/A-18 was also involved.)
0 AutoModerator 2017-12-23
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
5 fifteensunrises 2017-12-23
The only thing people were hiding from you was apparently a basic physics education.
5 Hermaphrotitties 2017-12-23
What horseshit, the entity that can harness free energy would literally rule the world. Also entropy, how does that work?
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Yeah, you are right. Hmm I wonder if those chaps who like to put strange symbols like a pyramid and an eye on stuff have knowledge of free energy. Maybe they could scam everyone into slavery to their system.
3 Hermaphrotitties 2017-12-23
LOL, why spend all that time enslaving us if they didn't actually need the work we produce?
1 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
runs away
1 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Yeah, why use cheap free and clean energies when you can fuck up the world beyond even your own repair for literal centuries, with hurricanes that you can't aim destroying your house and rising water lines fucking up your multi-million dollar mansions. Yeah, why would you use cheap energy when you can have that.
Gosh, who would want entire barrier reefs which you can use to keep the public entertained and distracted at no cost to you while you an spend millions on making inferior substitutes.
3 janisstukas 2017-12-23
I haven't watched John Hutchison in about 8 months because his drag persona was disgusting.
I think he got quite a bit of Japanese money for his natural batteries.
Thanks for posting.
3 heavyheavylowlowz 2017-12-23
r/IAMN30:
*Benevolently Misinformed
*Troll
*Idiot
r/heavyheavylowlowz:
*Benevolently Misinformed
*Troll
*Idiot
Doesn't matter which side you choose, I think OP is one of the above, or some combination of all 3, but this is why we have a mocking subreddit of r/TopMindsOfReddit.
In the end, we fight each other over negative evidence, which promotes an echo chamber. OP showed a few links that don't really show much other than some armature speculation. He is also a flat-Earther.
It also seems he does not understand scale or e=mc2. Some crystals or even a potato can power something, but that mass or energy is not "created". Show me the math otherwise and we can go from there, but a few random links and a pic of his "experiment" is not science, or even a worthy speculation.
2 greatlabrador 2017-12-23
fishy yep
3 theawesomethatis 2017-12-23
And yet another finds some minor bits of electrical knowledge and instantly jumps to OMG FREE ENERGY!
With a masters in electrical engineering i've sure met a lot of you fools in my lifetime.
a depressing number of them...
we need better schools.
As to OP. You could go put two nails into a tree and get that much FREE ENERGY! you know.
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Do it. I want to see that.
2 theawesomethatis 2017-12-23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-X0ME8eygwg
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Cool, now explain why we are still burning coal and oil and also fined for using electricity. He may be getting his energy from atmospheric ions Also I can easily take my crystals with me wherever I go, like in a barren desert or the ocean.
2 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
Can your crystals power a modern, industrialised society?
2 theawesomethatis 2017-12-23
because like all forms of 'free energy!' the output is so small it's beyond useless.
As for your crystals... a zinc air battery will last longer with a higher output.
and even with a hefty profit on them. they cost less than the gas you used to run the torch.
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I swear a good 75% of "people" commenting on here did not read my post and just want to bash me.
2 brock_lee 2017-12-23
How much energy did he use making it with that hot plate? Guess what, he could run LEDs or little motors longer using that energy....
5 CordouroyStilts 2017-12-23
You could heat it over a fire. Then it will aledgedly work indefinitely and the tree continues to grow.
7 brock_lee 2017-12-23
True, but burning wood is not "free energy."
0 CordouroyStilts 2017-12-23
It's renewable
6 brock_lee 2017-12-23
I don't disagree, but OP is touting free energy
1 BrickDickson 2017-12-23
He’s clearly having you on.
2 ChRoNicBuRrItOs 2017-12-23
Renewable != Free
2 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
None of what you said showed me that free energy exists. Just because you attach a multimeter to some copper and salt water? Are you trying to sell something, because thats not what this forum is for.
Dude you are just creating some organic power big whoop! Its not unlimited you said so yourself, and it won't power much so its useless. Photovoltaics can reach 32 percent efficiency, so why do I need your odd ramblings??
I cant believe people have upvoted you! You are a complete scam lol!
0 Faryshta 2017-12-23
this post proves the sorry state of this sub.
1 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
Perhaps, but the way I see it, this sub is great because we dont ban people for things we disagree with. He can freely post here, and I can freely take a dump all over his dinner party. Its a great thing actually, since I take more pleasure in correcting misinformation, than in circlejerking about what I already think :)
*I didnt downvote you btw. I think people are trying to tell you, this sub is better off free than under control for the feelz
1 Faryshta 2017-12-23
When did i suggested to Ban OP?
I suggested to read before voting
0 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
People who say this sub is in a "sorry state" are borderline attacking this sub. So please try to understand how people might perceive your words, rather than just asking for them to comprehend better, as if there is a better way to comprehend which you have not stated. If you just made it clear, rather than stating that clarity exists, that would help.
0 Faryshta 2017-12-23
I did stated a better way to understand. Read before voting
1 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
No you literally said, "this proves the sad state of this sub", which I took as an attack on this sub and still you act like I am just not reading properly, but you havent clarified that I have seen so now Im really confused at your insistance.
1 Faryshta 2017-12-23
1 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
I didnt say that you said to ban OP ffs. I said that you seemed to be attacking the sub, and I suggested that perhaps others felt this amounts to calling for censorship.
So just stop repeating yourself as if you've made a good point. You're actually leaving me to entirely assume that you meant something else, and now I must fabricate what you meant in order to say I understand you, but what if Im wrong? What if you did mean to attack this sub. You still havent made any effort to explicitly speak to this concern.
1 Faryshta 2017-12-23
then stop trying to make me justify things i never said. that way i will also stop repeating myself on correcting i never said those things.
1 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
Thank you for finally being explicit. I really honestly believe that Reddit needs more of it, because things just do get lost in translation. Dont you want to be understood better? Maybe you just didnt understand, that my intention was to understand lol. But you spent so much energy on not being explicit, and then did it anyways after. So I just think, it is best to be clear up front. Of course we are all at our own place in attaining this maxim- this ideal that I speak of. Ok sorry for putting you on the spot. That's just what I do :/
1 Faryshta 2017-12-23
explicit on what? I only said I wanted people here to read before voting and I did it 3 comments ago. Nothing changed since.
1 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
"i never said those things."
The above phrase indicates that, of what I said people may have thought, you didn't say those things, which is hopefully, synonymous with, "I didn't mean it that way."
So it seems you didn't mean it that way. I can't believe I actually have to ask, but you are forcing me by not being clear. Did you mean it that way? Did you mean your comment as a general attack on this sub? Isn't your opinion that this sub sucks?
It's against the rules, so that's why I was checking. I wanted to be very clear.
1 Faryshta 2017-12-23
I cant control what other people think so I wont even discuss anymore on that.
I can control what I say and write which is what I do. Complain to me about what I write, not about what people might or might not think of what I write.
1 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
Yep, but the whole time I've been asking you to clarify your stance on the suckiness of this sub and you've dodged every attempt I've made. It's as if you actually want, to make the exact same point five times in a row and have no further conversation.
1 Faryshta 2017-12-23
My stance was stated early and I have copy/pasted it. What else you need?
1 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
Ok I think I see what is going on here. It's a syntax issue. You asked a question, "When did I say ban the OP?"
I did not see that question as an explicit declaration. I saw it as an implicit one. I know that people regularly speak in ways that leave one to assume things, but in text format this is well, it's unhelpful to me. I want to understand. That is why I've maintained that you've not given me what I want. Im sorry that I was unable to make that clear.
1 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
And yet your response mentioned bans, and how great it is that the OP was "free" to make their post. So it was just a total non-sequitur then?
1 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
Who said anything about a ban?
People are bemoaning the fact that a sub full of supposed free-thinkers seems to regularly upvote any harebrained post, regardless of whether or not it holds up under scrutiny or displays the most rudimentary levels of knowledge and reasoning.
We should be able to do better than this.
1 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
So whats your solution? I think people who care should just, make quality posts. Problem solved.
2 RenaKunisaki 2017-12-23
Congratulations on discovering chemistry. Now, how do you know this energy source is unlimited?
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Build one and tell me when it stops.
1 RenaKunisaki 2017-12-23
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
2 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
Didn't you get the memo? The burden of proof is reversed in conspiracy subreddits. Anyone can declare any old thing they please is the gospel truth, and if you question it (or provide evidence to the contrary) you're immediately branded as a shill.
1 LCUCUY 2017-12-23
This thread is a fucking goldmine, laughs in perpetuity
1 IAmSeanMurrayAMA 2017-12-23
I’m going to assume that the reason this functions is because it is a magnesium cell. Unfortunately I don’t know what epsom salt is exactly - it’s magnesium sulfate, and anhydrous salt would provide the most magnesium, but odds are good it’s a hydrated salt, and if you pulled it out of your bathroom or something odds are very good it’s sucked moisture out of the air over time. Plus you said to make a paste with tap water so I really don’t know.
But I can give you a ballpark estimate.
So first we need to know the electrical load. You’re running four white LEDs which typically use about 10mA each. Are they as bright as you’d normally expect or somewhat dim? I’ll use Fermi estimation and say all four are drawing a combined 10mA. Voltage doesn’t really matter here. Nernst equation says it will decrease as the cell is used but the cell should be very close to dead by the time it drops below an LED’s required voltage.
Next, we need to know just how much charge your cells can move through the LEDs. A tablespoon of epsom salt, which your used in your powder, is 15mL. I mentioned why I would have to estimate before because I really don’t know how much is there. Wikipedia lists a lot of densities, depending on the water in the salt, around 2g/mL when solid. So we can say there are about 30g of magnesium sulfate in that tablespoon. Molar masses depend on the water content - it’s the molar mass of magnesium sulfate plus some number of water molecules - but they’re about 150g/mol. Now we get 0.2 moles of magesium sulfate and by extension magnesium in a tablespoon. Magnesium2+ ion will probably be reduced to magnesium metal, a reaction involving two electrons in the cell, so 0.4 moles of electrons may move. Let’s say between 0.1 and 1 moles of electrons.
The charge of an electron is defined as -1.6*10-19 coulombs; it is the elementary charge. A mole of electrons is 6.022*1023 (Avogadro’s number - it’s not really any different than a dozen or a score of something, just intended to be used with atomic scale things) of them. Faraday’s constant gives us a conversion factor: a mole of electrons has a charge of -96485C. Therefore your cell can spit out between 10000C and 100000C worth of charge.
Instead of saying 10mA we can say 10mC/s (milli-coulombs per second, charge over time) equals 0.01C/s (coulombs per second, just divide by 1000 and drop the milli) and convert:
10000C/(0.01C/s) = 1,000,000 seconds ~= 10 days
100000C/(0.01C/s) = 10,000,000 seconds ~= 100 days
Converting those gives you life times on the order of a week to a season. My prediction is that, with such a small load, your setup will last about a month.
That’s a long time, but that isn’t forever, and it isn’t free. You’ll meed a larger amount of energy to drive the electrochemical reaction in the opposite direction to recharge the cell. But get back to us on this. Electrochemistry is such a neat field and I genuinely want to hear the results.
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I reduced all my ingredients to remove the moisture.
I said to make a water paste mixture only to make epsom salt crystals for a separate experiment.
Read closely.
1 IAmSeanMurrayAMA 2017-12-23
Not the reduction I had in mind. I meant the "re" part of redox. Unless you ended up with solid metal after reducing we're probably thinking of different things lol.
Yeah I realized that after rereading but I forgot to edit, sorry.
2 JerodTheAwesome 2017-12-23
If you found a way to create unlimitted energy and disregard the second law of thermondynamics you are not only solving the world energy problem, but you have also become god and are no longer limitted by any physical laws. Congratulations on your transcendants, please tell us what the inside of black holes are like
1 blue_limit1 2017-12-23
What do you think of Nassim Harameins work with crystals?
If I'm not mistaken, he's released his product, I haven't looked into it for a bit now, but just wondering if you're more familiar?
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
I had not heard of him or his work until now. Quartz is a very powerful piezoelectric substance, there may be great promise in his designs. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.
1 blue_limit1 2017-12-23
No problem, /r/holofractal is the sub for his theory on the universe.
A "theory of everything"
2 CordouroyStilts 2017-12-23
Thanks for posting this. Really interesting stuff.
1 NighthawkNFLD 2017-12-23
This just reminded me of something. I watched a very interesting zero point energy documentary one time and if I remember correctly molten quartz was a major component.
1 fifteensunrises 2017-12-23
Millionaire scam artist seems to be the most fitting description.
1 TheStrangeTamer 2017-12-23
Of Course it does how else do these Aliens Travel the cosmos?
3 IAMN30 2017-12-23
aLIEns are a lie.
1 bigred198 2017-12-23
You should go bigger. Maybe get one of those above ground swimming pools, fill it with salt, and power your whole house?
3 Averagepunpun 2017-12-23
If that's true...Antarctica has the largest source of crystallized H2O and certain areas are conveniently off limits to the public
1 ChinaXpat 2017-12-23
got any articles or maps?
2 Averagepunpun 2017-12-23
Even if the world map might not be to scale, Antarctica clearly has the largest mass of ice on this planet. And also the idea of superconductivity. If there is any place that's perfect for maintaining subzero temperatures, it's probably a lab in Antarctica.
2 BrickDickson 2017-12-23
Actually, the best place for maintaining subzero temperatures is any lab with the proper equipment, regardless of the location. Superconductivity only occurs at temperatures well below any found naturally on Earth, so even the cold winds of Antarctica would only serve to heat up the material and stop any superconductive behaviour.
2 RenaKunisaki 2017-12-23
Look at any map, you can see it. Crystalized H2O is just ice.
1 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
Antarctica is a conspiracy by Big Globe.
2 Faryshta 2017-12-23
that thing captures radio waves and turn them back into electricity. you would need at least one square kilometer of space to capture enough energy to power a house with a fridge, tv and a dozen light bulbs.
and that considering there are enough radio stations near you to capture enough radio waves.
0 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Not true. a 10ftx10ft cell will produce the same voltage as a 1inchx1inch one.
Smaller is better, then wiring them in series and parallel.
2 Bond4141 2017-12-23
Voltage is only half the problem. You also need Amps.
1 Faryshta 2017-12-23
and for that you need (drum rolls) space
1 nut_conspiracy_nut 2017-12-23
If energy could be created out of absolutely nothing, then our universe would explode. You can only convert the energy, not create it.
1 Faryshta 2017-12-23
I was hoping it ended up with a refence to drills and piercing heavens, but no, this guy is honestly retarded.
In a couple weeks i will copy/paste this post with same title and change all crystal references to drills to see how many people upvote it.
1 Smokedcheesefigurine 2017-12-23
A lot of Americans seems to be in awe of how a Cambodian made a rabbit trap on YouTube
1 jdubb198 2017-12-23
Thanks a lot for your post. Very interesting. Ill try this out on my own offline.
There seems to be a team of free energy deniers from USA Govt persona management sock puppet reddit accounts. You can tell you hit a truth worth hiding because of how violently they are attacking you with commentd and down votes. That isnt normal reddit traffic.
1 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
Disagreeing with someone based on acience now means we are all shills and trolls? No that is untrue. Please. I am a student of chemistry, and what this person is saying is very sensationalistic. Please ask me anything. Im training to be a scientist. The OP is overexaggerating a simple thing. Its not free energy at all.
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Try different mixture ratios and ingredients. Rochelle salts and ground quartz may increase the output as well as more conductive materials in the cell construction.
1 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
Where am I getting the energy to heat the cup of water?
Where am I getting the energy to power my fridge?
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
That is not from the segment about making crystal cells. Read the entire post.
1 PerdidasBH 2017-12-23
This is the entire segment I'm quoting from:
The energy didn't just appear from nowhere.
1 crestind 2017-12-23
I believe you, OP. Firstly, I hope you are running Tails on a burner laptop at a coffee shop while wearing a fake moustache. Secondly, does it utilize a quartz crystal? I have read strange things about quartz.
Things happen when you pass an electric current next to quartz crystals. Strange things not mentioned in mainstream science books. Yes, there's the inverse piezoelectric effect, but it's not that. PM me your secrets, anyone who sees this. Plz halp.
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
No, I am on my personal laptop. I am not going to hide, I am prepared to fight. The time is now. I did not add quartz in the one crystal bank I posted about however I recently made a slighly larger 3/4 inch cap cell that utilized ground quartz. It has only a slightly higher amperage but I did not add very much at all.
1 nuzebe 2017-12-23
I can make you a battery out of a potato. It costs you next to nothing and can power next to nothing. I think I did it in like kindergarten.
Speaking of potatoes, OP, bruh, real talk, how old are you? Get off the computer for a bit bruh and turn off the Coast-to-Coast and Infowars and walk outside for a bit.
Just take a breath dude. If you’re a kid, just go be a kid. If you’re an adult, take it easy and go get a drink.
You’re gonna end up in a cult or something. I dunno but, like, dude, the world is not flat, and the world’s governments are not all in bed to keep secret free energy from the public. They’re (whoever “they” are) not withholding the cure for cancer from us.
You’re some kind of weird optimistic nihilist or something.
Just relax and take your meds.
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Then make a battery out of a potato and power a radio with it for years on end. Thats what I am doing now.
1 amathia_ 2017-12-23
So you have an electrochemical reaction going on, thus forming more salt crystals. It certainly wouldn't last forever. Is it eating up your copper shell, or depositing onto it? Nonetheless, you're not getting more salt crystals from nowhere.
The refining of metals is a highly electric intensive process. In a sense what you're doing is storing electricity when you refine the metals, then releasing that stored electricity as you let the metal corrode.
As far as filling a room with dry cell batteries to supply the power for your house. Sure, you can do it. Buying a couple of tons of copper, magnesium, and the other required salts won't be cheap.
0 CaptainApollyon 2017-12-23
We used to use it. All the pre 1700s palaces and cathedrals in Northern Europe were originally constructed without fireplaces. And when we do see something that could be called a fireplace we see that the mechanics would actually cause a shit load of smoke to fill the room. When we see them today mostly we see them as secondary constructions with modern mechanics. Look at all the old photographs scan them for strange widgets I assure you these energy harvesting dodads are there waiting to be seen.
https://xp.reddit.com/r/AlternativeHistory/comments/7kikvb/sigismunds_column_warsow_or_why_is_he_now_holding/?st=JBIUGJSO&sh=c1169cee
2 jargonoid 2017-12-23
What is that xp prefix for?
2 CaptainApollyon 2017-12-23
Cross post
1 jargonoid 2017-12-23
ah, thanks
0 pooptypeuptypantss 2017-12-23
Yup. Tesla created free energy and nothing happened with it because there is no way to make money off it.
Which is why the world is the way it is. People only want to "help" people if they get some kind of benefit from it.
Obviously there are the odd exceptions, like buddy there who gave penicillin for free, or the internet.
3 Bond4141 2017-12-23
There is a market for free energy though.
Make a big power plant, and say its nuclear, coal, whatever. Then output your energy for no cost, while being paid.
2 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
Yeah and surround that free energy device with the most deadly radioactive material possible, so that nobody ever goes in there and sees it!
1 nuzebe 2017-12-23
So I guess Chernobyl was a free energy source in this analogy?
1 joshua_ray 2017-12-23
A temporary free energy source yes lol.
1 Gil-Gandel 2017-12-23
Are you fucking kidding me?
I build my free energy plant. I supply a terawatt of free energy to the grid. I undercut the regular suppliers by 80%. The power distributors beat a path to my door. I keep the secret to myself while building more power plants until I have the whole market to myself. Distributors make more money, customers get some of the savings passed on to them, I become crazy rich and spend the rest of my life surrounded by porn models. In my will I leave the secret to humanity so they will put up statues to me, make biopics about me, and discreetly ignore the part about the porn models. Literally not seeing a downside here.
1 nuzebe 2017-12-23
You should watch The Spanish Prisoner. It’s a crazy amazing David Mamet movie.
3 ehll_oh_ehll 2017-12-23
Reposting from another user
While the incident is mysterious, it is pretty plainly not a hoax. The Department of Defense has released video of the unidentified object. The USS Princeton observed the UFO on radar, and six Super Hornets—twelve pilots and weapons system operators—saw the objects. (According to FighterSweep.com, which published an account of the incident in 2015, a seventh aircraft, a Marine F/A-18 was also involved.)
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
That proves nothing.
2 Rob_V 2017-12-23
The production of magnesium (which is present in your mystery energy crystals) is not clean at all. Extraction of mineral resources has a huge environmental impact. I recently finished a year-long project where I developed an organic material which adsorbs airborne pollutants. During that project, I did extensive research on different sources of pollution. I know my shit.
As to how it works, it's just a dry cell ffs. Google that shit, man, I'm not going to waste time trying to educate every stubborn idiot on the internet. Refining metal is an energy-intensive process. You're releasing this energy while the copper is corroding as a product of the electrochemical reaction that's making the electricity.
If you're an adult you should be ashamed of not understanding basic science.
Edit: I can't believe I'm taking time off my work to teach you elementary school-level shit.
18 kalestew 2017-12-23
The radio and the cell are two different things.
4 uusu 2017-12-23
Yes, radio waves are a form of electromagnetic energy. The sound is created by alternating the energy levels.
So let's say you want to move something elastic, maybe the band of a slingshot, by a certain amount. You pull it with your fingers and stretch it. YOU are the energy source here. That energy is carried from your muscles to the band.
Similarly, the radio tower is the energy source for the audio information. The energy is carried by the electromagnetic waves, radio waves. Just like you pull the elastic band of the slingshot with your hand, the electromagnetic waves pull the little speakers of your headphones.
But the energy to pull the speakers itself is still coming from the radio tower. It is not created out of nothing.
1 IAMN30 2017-12-23
Build one and tell me when it stops.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2017-12-23
Have you tested this to an extent it could be published as a paper?