Free Energy DIY Manual
21 2018-01-02 by IAMN30
YOU!
YES YOU THERE.
On your digital device!
Reading the text!
How would YOU like to power that device - forever - without plugging it in to that seemingly abundant government supply of humming buzzing 120 volts at 50-60 hertz of alternating current flowing through your walls or buying expensive poison tubes that have slogans like "keeps going and going" but die in a day?
Why bother doing so, you ask?
Because I dont like the idea that Im not in control of my life.
And one day that government supply might stop.
And those battery factories might close.
Then what?
Then these words wont be read when your device sits all dead.
THE FREE ENERGY MANUAL
Atmospheric energy harvesting, simple saltwater batteries and variously applied over unity circuits are excellent paths to energy freedom.
Here is just one method to create a power source that, paired with some knowledge about alchemy and electricity, can be used to power anything for years.
INSTRUCTIONS
In this instruction manual you will be heating a copper pipe cap filled with ground salts that will liquify around a dissimilar metal core.
They should each have an output of .8 to 1.5 volts and between 30-150 milliamps
Ensure that you have a heat source and grinding apparatus prepared with which you may either easily clean or not use for edible food as some ingredients (Borax) should not be consumed.
- Step 1
Buy a 1/2 inch copper pipe cap (preferably with a flat bottom that can stand on its own) and about a 3/4 inch long hex bolt or any other clean bolt with a flat head that will fit inside the copper cap.
- Step 2
Find a piece of engine gasket material or wood or leather. Anything that is semi heat resistant and can be cut down to size in order to fit in to the 1/2 inch copper pipe cap. Place the material inside the copper cap at the bottom.
- Step 3
Gather some Borax, Alum, Epsom Salt, and Potassium Chloride - the latter of these is commonly found in salt subsitute seasonings. Make sure the epsom salt does not say +H20. If thats all you can find then place the epsom salt in a thin layer on a sheet of aluminum foil over heat and boil off the water. The white chunks leftover will need to be ground in to a powder.
- Step 4
Measure out and grind each ingredient to the proportions you are using. An equal mix of each ingredient is a good ratio to start with. So for a small copper cap, only a 1/2 tablespoon of each ingredient is enough. Make sure to keep all the ingredients as dry as possible.
- Step 5
Mix all the ingredients together. Grinding again is helpful, the finer the grind the better. Now, pour the powder in to the copper pipe cap. Fill it about half way. Have more ready, for when it liquifies, it condenses quite a lot.
- Step 6
Find a small piece of wire or something that you can stir with. Turn on your heat source to a low setting. Place your copper cap over the heat. Stir while it is heating and the salts will liquify. Add more salts and continue stirring until it is almost full. Place the metal core in the middle, while the copper is still on the heat, then carefully remove it from the heat and let it cool for 30 minutes.
If the salts will not liquify. Increase the heat slightly. If they still do not, either the salts were not ground well enough or too much moisture is present.
- Completion
You have completed your very own crystal power cell.
Test it with a multimeter and see the fruits of your labour.
CONCLUSION
This is a rough version.
These cells are not magic.
They have limits.
If you draw more energy than they can create they will slowly dim and cease to have any output.
But if you disconnect what was drawing power, it will regain its previous charge over time.
The key to seemingly perpetual energy is to balance what they create and what you draw.
These cells actually begin to have a higher output the longer they are connected to a load. Sometimes as much as 5-15% or more. And inversely they seem to work less efficiently the longer they are not connected to something. Although initially the cells drop in voltage slightly in the first few days after creation, this is likely due to heat energy being worn off, the voltage does settle, and the voltage rise can then be seen after that.
These crystal cells are widely unknown and apparently taboo devices.
I wish to see that changed.
Also Earth is not a globe. Weve been totally fed like.. Lies yo....
59 comments
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Addition: The mixture ingredients and ratios can be changed. Try adding an equal part of rochelle salts and/or very small amounts silver, galena, iron pyrite, and quartz.
The copper cap and machine bolt may also be subsituted for other materials such as magnesium. Try different plated bolts like zinc or nickel. Also possibly carbon or graphene.
I hit the post text limit.
1 Larsgoetia 2018-01-02
Red quartz to be exact. It has radioactive properties. Much of these ingredients are mentioned in ancient scripts. Its highly plausible that some of those buildings were themselves batteries.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Normal quartz crystal works as well. I believe it is because of the piezoelectric effect.
1 Larsgoetia 2018-01-02
I was aware that you could store data in all kinds of quartz. I didn't realize it was all piezoelectric. I was under the impression that it was just the red quartz.
1 Rockran 2018-01-02
Prove it.
1 buzzpresto 2018-01-02
Look up galvanic cells, it's highschool chemistry.
1 oxfouzer 2018-01-02
Why don't you make a video and show us, seems like you've perfected the technique, no?
Also, if I have to add heat to get power, it's... Not really much of a discovery.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
http://laserhacker.com/?p=326
Videos are there. However sometimes a well explained manual is better than a video.
1 swordofdamocles42 2018-01-02
https://www.youtube.com/user/lasersaber/search?query=crystal
1 oxfouzer 2018-01-02
Ok, NOW I'm intrigued... BRB rabbit hole time...
1 swordofdamocles42 2018-01-02
i'm gonna make some, as the cost is only a few bucks.... just seem quite week.
what i'm thinking of are some kind of cube around 8 inches... that could be stacked together. no idea if it would work though but it needs trying
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
As long as the bolt sticks of the cap or cube enough, theyll stack in series just fine.
Actually you can join 3 or 4 together in parallel, just place them in a little group with the copper bases all touching, e tape them tightly, then wire the bolts together, and stack them in series.
Again, they would have much more output with a small piece of solid magnesium but that is a difficult thing to find. I hear the magnesiun tape does not work very well, but I dont know for sure. Other highly conductive materials may work as well.
1 swordofdamocles42 2018-01-02
hey thanks, great info.
do we know what creates more power? is it more crystal the better or more surface area between the crystal and the metals. (like a long thin pipe.)
1 swordofdamocles42 2018-01-02
i found some videos from a similar thread last week https://www.youtube.com/user/lasersaber/search?query=crystal
seems legit... but has anyone made a big one yet?
1 g9g9g9g9 2018-01-02
Please don't use the term "free energy", what you are describing is the creation of a battery cell, it's not free energy.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
I do not call them batteries because I am not entirely sure it is a chemical battery. Mostly because of the fact that piezoelectric materials benefit its output. If this cell functions through vibrations or natural frequencies, then by definition, it is not a chemical reaction, therefore not a battery.
1 Larsgoetia 2018-01-02
Thats the fucking refined recipe for what's his nutses zero point energy batteries. You're a god damned saint. A veritable fucking prometheus! Thank you.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
John K Hutchison is whats his nuts.
1 Larsgoetia 2018-01-02
YUS! That's the cat I was thinking about. I really want to test this out. To see he if he was really onto something. If so I need to rewatch all those videos and pay a lot more attention this time.
1 i_am_unikitty 2018-01-02
Here is the energetic forum thread
I'd strongly hesitate to call this free energy as it's a galvanic process which will cause the electrode to corrode over time. But : vastly more information in this here link
http://www.energeticforum.com/john-bedini/7351-bedini-earth-light-6.html
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
I hesistate to call them galvanic. Here is another video from lasersaber, in which he splits open a crystal cell he made and found no corrosion.
https://youtu.be/3cJFkIDImuM
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
There is corrosion there. It’s what’s causing the rods to get forced out and the pipes to burst. The corroded material takes up more volume than the metal. That’s where the pressure is coming from. Plus, you can see the dark corroded material outlining the rod. Corrosion happens on the surface, not the inside of the rod.
These are chemical batteries, nothing more. The reason they last such a long time is because there is just a lot of anode material available. They are very cheap to build and last a long long time. The downside is they are heavy, large, and produce very little power.
This is simple redox electrochemistry and we understand how these things work. When kids make electrochemical cells out of lemons or potatoes they are applying the same concepts.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
The corrosion is not from the creation from energy. Anything corrodes, just sitting there doing nothing.
http://www.rexresearch.com/reid/reid.htm
These are not lemon batteries and when viewed on a oscilliscope you can see them discharge and charge on their own over and over.
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
Despite what you claim, these are designed and built the same way you would build an electrochemical cell. You can’t assembles these materials together in this way then wire them up and claim something other than electrochemistry is occurring.
These are very simple devices to understand. If you want to prove that some kind of exotic crystal energy is occurring here you need to find a different way to prove it because the electrochemistry is going to serve as a confounding factor. These are magnesium-copper batteries by design.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
It is easily provable and has been done. Build one and hook it up to an oscilloscope.
You just need the government to tell you they arent simple chemical cells dont you... :(
Nothing I can say will change your mind unless I have a government suit on and a 500,000 dollar piece of paper on my wall.
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
If there is merit to this you should be able to defend it by explaining how these experiments prove your claims. Try to do that without mentioning government indoctrination and conspiracy. Not only is it insulting but it does not help your cause in the slightest. Let the evidence speak for itself. As it stands, all of this says these are electrochemical cells by design.
Now let’s discuss how the charge cycles prove it’s not. Please explain why these would not function as electrochemical cells based on the oscilloscope observations. It seems to me that these would still produce voltage as long as there is unoxidized anode left. The charge/discharge cycles are an interesting observation but I don’t see how these prove crystal power on their own. Can you elaborate?
1 echief 2018-01-02
Check his post history, he shows probable signs of delusion you will not be able to convince him of anything. He will not supply any evidence besides some some firsthand accounts of wacky readings which can't be backed up in any way.
He is convinced that because it doesn't look like an average homemade wet cell and that he didn't add any water in the process it can't be a battery, thats the level of understanding of electrochemistry he's operating at. Looking at some of the videos he's linked it seems like this is a decently common phenomenon of people creating battery cells they don't understand and assuming they must be free energy machines, and anybody who tries to explain reality to them has to be an oil shill
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
Yes I know, I actually have a Bachelors of Science in biochemistry. I have a strong understanding of electrochemistry. I'm just bored and sort of experimenting with him, seeing if I can get this person to think things through a bit more. It seems the people who are responding by calling him crazy and delusional only reinforce his delusions. I am trying to have a higher level discussion by giving him a chance to explain these ideas and hopefully get passed their ideological/conspiratorial defenses that they immediately default to. I don't expect this to work.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Lol Is this how Tesla felt? Everyone just calling him delusional? Why thats absurd! How dare you try to advance technology! Heathen.
Do not be so quick to dismiss the impossible.
As the other very rude comment states, there is obviouslt very little I can do to sway your opinion. I can post photos, multimeter readings, whatever, but you both still sit around here bashing me and jerkin each other off.
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
You can start by explaining to me the significance of the oscilloscope findings, as in explain how they rule out the electrochemistry of the cell. Do not leave out any assumptions or inferences you think I would make. Explain to me like I know nothing about this at all.
I promise I will not mock you or call you stupid. I consider myself a skeptic, which means I approach anything with a critical yet open mind. Try to convince me. What do you have to lose?
If all you can do is respond with uncritical and irrelevant cliams of persecution and paranoid conspiracy theories without discussing the technical details then, no, you will never convince me or anyone else of anything.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Why dont you read the link. It is exactly what you are asking for. Report back with concerns. Or.... MAKE YOUR OWN THEN TRY TO PROVE ME WRONG.
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
I did read the report and did exactly what you just suggested. The research says the crystal battery "recharges" when depleted. But if there is anode left then the electrochemical cell will not be depleted. So how do you reconcile that?
Are you capable of having a reasonable discussion with someone who doesn't believe you? That's all I'm really trying to do.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Tell me what happens,when you,take any battery you can today, cross the poles, short it out, and let it sit like that for a day. What would happen to that battery? Would you be able to remove the short and still have a battery that can power anything without charging it again? Assuming the battery didnt explode?
These crystal cells are different.
And yes, I am being attacked by those who wish this to be kept secret.
Look at this ridiculous Instructables article. Its titled, "zero cost electricity" sounds like something I said... Like free or something... But there arent any idiot shills foaming at the mouth over there, oh no, because thats the REAL zero cost electricity....LEMONS.... Riiiight.
The proof is in the pudding. John Bedini, Marcus Reid, John Hutchison, Laser Hacker, and obviously more have again and again built and tested these crystal cells. But its not going anywhere because it would destroy the facade built by the parasitic globalists who epitomize Animal Farm, are creating an Orwellian future, and again and again admit to idolize the construction of a new one world order.
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
Has anyone tried making these batteries using the same material for both the anode and cathode? Is there any reason why it wouldn’t work?
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Yes it works with copper and copper but not as well. Electricity flows in one direction, I think two metals aids the flow of it.
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
Electricity flows from high to low potential. That’s what you’re measuring when you measure voltage. Now why would connecting two electrodes of different metals aid in the flow if the crystal is what’s generating the voltage? One would think using an electrode with the highest conductivity would work best as this would impeded the flow the least, so using copper for both should produce a better battery. Why doesn’t this work in practice? What is it about using copper and zinc electrodes that enhances the flow?
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Doesnt your first sentence answer your last?
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
No, it really doesn’t. It doesn’t explain why the potential being generated by the crystal is enhanced by using different metals. The conductivity in one is lower, which would increase resistance and lower the overall potential, not increase it. This is all assuming the cell is being powered by the crystal, as in the crystal is generating an electrical potential (i.e. a voltage). The cell is enhanced by using two different metals with different conductivities but impeded by using the only the metal with the better conductivity. So conductivity is not the key variable here. So then what else might be going on that explains this?
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Why does it not answer the question? As you stated electricity flows from high to low potential, so if both materials are the potential same how then can electricity flow?
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
The question is how the potential is being generated. Is it the metals generating the potential or the crystal? Whatever is generating the potential is what’s powering the cell. If the electrodes are powering the cell, the how is this any different than a normal electrochemical battery?
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Do normal electrochemical batteries charge themselves?
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
No, but they will continue generating potential as long as there is anode left. The anode in these cells would be the zinc or magnesium rods.
Do you understand how electrochemical cells work?
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Well these crystals do charge themselves.
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
Do you understand how electrochemical cells work?
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Yes. Maybe this is a way of making batteteries in which the anode never corrodes? In other words it lasts forever.
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
In normal electrochemical cells, the energy comes from the corrosion. If the electrodes don’t corrode, then where is the energy coming from? The crystals?
Okay, let’s assume it comes from the crystals. In order to prevent the anode from corroding, it would need to produce a voltage. Otherwise you’re violating the laws of thermodynamics by creating free energy.
But now, if the crystals are producing a voltage, they can generate current all on their own and the electrodes are unnecessary. So why then so these batteries require electrodes at all?
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
Hey man, listen, I did more research into this and you need to realize that this is a simple galvanic cell. Even the people who give tutorials on how to make these explain as much and even cite galvanic tables and principles to explain concepts and predict the kinds of voltages one can expect.
The reason they “recharge” is not because they’re recharging at all. They go flat due to a build up of charged ions around the electrodes and it takes time for the pazeioelectric material to dissipate these charges. So the cell becomes inhibited when you draw too much current, not depleted.
The reason they last so long is the same reason galvanized roofs and such can last ten years: the protective galvanic anode simply hasn’t been depleted.
I know you don’t actually understand how galvanic cells work. It’s really easy to tell and not being honest with yourself about this only stunts your own intellectual development. Electrochemical principles really are not difficult to understand and you should take some time to learn about them. Regardless of what conspiracy theories you subscribe to, you can play with and test the relevant concepts yourself, completely on your own, by making your own simple batteries with easily accessible materials and equipment. You basically have already started doing this.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
If they are so simple, why dont all batteries last for years and years?
A more refined version of the cells could be comparable in size and output to a AA.
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
Because normal batteries are designed to be useful. These batteries last a long time because they produce such little power. Let us use the numbers reported in the Reid experiments you linked. From 1999 to 2006 the battery produced a whopping 60 watt-hours. Let me put that in perspective;
60 watt-hours is enough energy to light one 60 watt light bulb for 1 hour. So if you stored all the energy this battery produced over the course of 7 years, you would only be able to keep 1 incandescent light bulb lit for 1 hour.
In other terms, if this battery had the capacity to powre a 60 watt bulb (it doesn't) it would burn through all the energy it provided during that entire 7 year period in 1 hour.
The amount of energy that went into refining the materials you used to make this, not even considering the energy used to heat the salt, far surpasses the energy produced by this battery in 7 years.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QZ0oCND23S4
1 Kosmological 2018-01-02
Hooking batteries up in series sums their voltages. You can try this yourself but be careful. These batteries are pushing 12 to 14 volts because each of the 10 batteries in this series is pushing 1.2 to 1.4 volts. That is the expected voltage for a copper-magnesium galvanic cell.
This poster does not provide expected lifespans for these specific cells but he does say the amperage will drop down by an order of magnitude because these cells are "fresh." The batteries in the Reid experiments you cited produced 60 watt hours over 7 years, around the energy density of a nickle hydride battery, as mentioned in the source you cited. I'm taking everything you have given me at face value and even ignored the things which aren't accurate.
After watching more videos on this guys youtube channel, he would probably tell you the same shit I'm telling you right now. He demonstrates a strong understanding of how these cells work and seems to understand that corrosion is occurring and the internal pressure produced by the "crystal" growth caused by the corrosion improves the longevity. He plays with them because they are a cool little oddities and they last a long time, not because they're some revolutionary technology. They are so simple and easy to understand and produce that some random guy can make them in his garage. Think about that.
1 RANDOMLY_AGGRESSIVE 2018-01-02
Why is your anode so big?
1 Sign_Upp 2018-01-02
your last link is 404. also are you Zeb? your drawings look a lot like a friend of mine's
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Thank you and no I am not.
1 justinxduff 2018-01-02
There is no such thing as free energy.
1 ifrikkenr 2018-01-02
You've described an inefficient version of a galvanic cell.
For less cost and effort you could buy a small solar cell and have actual "free" energy
1 oxfouzer 2018-01-02
Questions for OP:
Most bolts you find at a hardware store are steel plated with zinc. The videos show magnesium... Are you saying a zinc bolt will work?
The recipe looks suspiciously like the recipe for a smoke bomb, if I recall correctly... Have you performed this exact procedure/can you attest that it is safe?
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
Yes zinc works and yes it is safe. I literally just made two more. Another neat way to make these is to dip a copper wire in the mixture until it is coated enough to be able to be wrapped in aluminum foil without the foil touching the copper. They do not create as much output but are very small.
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
http://laserhacker.com/?p=326
Videos are there. However sometimes a well explained manual is better than a video.
1 swordofdamocles42 2018-01-02
https://www.youtube.com/user/lasersaber/search?query=crystal
1 IAMN30 2018-01-02
John K Hutchison is whats his nuts.