Trump’s downfall
0 2018-01-07 by Quetzalcoatlwasright
So they failed with the Russian probe. Now they’re trying to attack him, claiming that he’s mentally unsuitable. When CNN is citing the 25th Amendment, hinting that maybe Pence should be handed power.. that’s when I know something incredibly fishy is going on.
Of course there’s the possibility that this is all a stage.
But what if they really did take down Trump and hand power to Pence and McConnell and Sessions?
The CNN/CIA is either incredibly desperate or they’re playing America right into their hand. I tend to think it’s the latter.
Any press is good press.
Ask Logan Paul.
71 comments
1 KickedinTheDick 2018-01-07
In my eyes, whther or not Trump is in on it, they are using him as a tool for divide and conquer. Most people arent in the middle with him. They either love him and blindly follow him or despise him for reasons they cant elaborate on. I simply see this as a way to create more fighting over him
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Agreed. I’m definitely in that minority that is in the middle. I mean he’s done a lot of but there’s too much sketchiness for me to buy in.
israel
1 mastigia 2018-01-07
I feel like Israel is quietly winning big time here. We will see.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
They def are. Who in their right mind would be pushing for war with Iran or even any US involvement? Yet, here we are.
1 mastigia 2018-01-07
I think Iran is probably the most abused out of anyone im the ME. It is very sad.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Yeah but they’re no pushovers and they have powerful allies..
1 mastigia 2018-01-07
True story.
1 IndigoMD 2018-01-07
I'm sure people have enough reasons to dislike him it's just the latter believes no can't dislike him and it they do dislike them it has to be proved until the latter agrees.
1 KickedinTheDick 2018-01-07
Definitely. I was just generalizing most of the masses, though. Obviously some people actually think for themselves.
1 IndigoMD 2018-01-07
Yea it's kinda hard to navigate the ewebz without generalizing
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-07
I could elaborate on reasons I hate him all day!
1 ogrelin 2018-01-07
I get faith in humanity restored every time I see someone using reason to come to sensible conclusions. You didn’t fall for the theater play being put on for the public in the media. Good man. Have 1up on me.
1 UnbearablePenguin 2018-01-07
You think people don’t have any reason to despise Trump?
1 KickedinTheDick 2018-01-07
No. I think many people dislike Trump for reasons they cant explain because the media told them to. There are plenty of reasons to dislike Trump, but many haters cant list them off.
1 UnbearablePenguin 2018-01-07
I guess people that don’t dislike him have never seen him speak or read his tweets.
1 chiguyyy 2018-01-07
How did they fail with the Russian probe? It’s still going on.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Everyone’s backtracking on it now. They’re shifting the narrative to “He’s not mentally fit to be President”
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-07
I don’t recall anybody from Mueller’s team saying that.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-07
Nobody is backtracking at all. People are talking about Trump being a child like retard because of that new book that just came out where everyone in the white house called him a childish retard.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Please do not taint this thread with this stuff.. that guy who wrote that book is a shill. It’s a bunch of tabloid nonsense. They may or may not have said those things.
It’s irrelevant.
I don’t have time for someone who’s going to focus on name calling.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-07
I'd say it's pretty relevant when the president is so insecure about this new book that he sends out Huckabee to talk shit about it and then sends out the most ridiculous tweet I've ever seen about being a stable genius.
1 Lo0seR 2018-01-07
So you believe it's all real?
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Lol.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
I’m not arguing Trump’s position. I’m discounting your’s. Your username and initial comment are in bad taste and you clearly are polarized by the issue, so I don’t want to speak to you, unfortunately.
1 dfu3568ete6 2018-01-07
"Your username triggers me and I have no counterargument so I don't want to speak with you" lol
Following...
">that guy who wrote that book is a shill......I don’t have time for someone who’s going to focus on name calling."
LMAO
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
I have no need to defend myself here. I’m not polarized in the subject.
It was the combination of the name, and the comment.
You left that part out, of course.
1 UnbearablePenguin 2018-01-07
I guess he should change it since it bothers you so much?
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
I could not care less.
1 Lo0seR 2018-01-07
Your comment history shows if SJWPussyLibtard types out the word "the" in a comment, it's good for a +50 in this /sub, not bad for a new user, looking forward to some your submits.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Coughpaidshillcough*
1 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2018-01-07
Please avoid attacking other users.
1 vidarheheh 2018-01-07
Nice
1 chiguyyy 2018-01-07
That’s only because the book was just released on Friday. The Russian probe will be in the headlines for a lot longer than the book will be.
Additionally, the book would have come and gone without so much fanfare if the President had thicker skin. He has brought a lot of the attention to this book on his own. The guy just needs to stop tweeting.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
The Russian probe is an absurdity. Clinton and Obama are guilty of colluding with Russia just as much of not more than the Trump campaign. Global leaders collude. That part is irrelevant.
The part that is relevant, is the question as to why Trump was chosen to be the fall guy for what we know to take place everyday amid world governments.
1 chiguyyy 2018-01-07
Clinton and Obama are guilty too? Based on what? Your gut? If there was even a shred of evidence that there was any truth to that, you don’t think Fox News wouldn’t be having that as the lead story every hour?
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
They did. Uranium one was a big deal, only Fox is slightly more concerned with the country’s actual news than CNN/CIA. Right wing news also spends a lot more time complimenting “their guy” (Hitler-esque, double think) where left wing news spends a lot more time discounting “the other guy”.
Also, it’s all a scam anyway. If you think Trump and Hillary aren’t friends, you’re way behind schedule.
It’s just a show for you to watch. The real shenanigans are going on behind the scenes and you and I can only speculate.
1 chiguyyy 2018-01-07
Uranium One was only a big deal to Fox because they had to cover something that made Clinton look bad. The truth is that Uranium One wasn’t a big deal. Russia did not take any uranium out of the country. It wasn’t Clinton that made the decision to sell anything to a Russian company. It’s all bs that they spin for their own political gain. If you think I support Clinton, you are wrong. She is as bad as Trump, but much better at hiding her flaws.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Well fair enough, so long as you understand that there’s no point in picking an choosing :)
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Well fair enough, so long as you understand that there’s no point in picking an choosing :)
1 calebdallas 2018-01-07
uh...not just Fox
1 chiguyyy 2018-01-07
Your link didn’t work. Even if it has been in The NY Times, it hasn’t been the lead story like it had been on Fox. Almost. Every. Single. Day!!
1 calebdallas 2018-01-07
My bad! I fixed it. That’s true but honestly...isn’t that what happens daily on the liberal side of the news? It goes both ways...and the truth is the 1% doesn’t care about us on any side of this.
1 chiguyyy 2018-01-07
That article is almost 3 years old!! Not exactly headline news everyday. Fox acts as if there are breaking developments on it daily. There isn’t. It’s been beaten like the Benghazi “scandal”, which the GOP want to bring up once again.
As far as the liberal side of the news, are you referring to pretty much everything besides Fox? Every other news channel I have seen does not spend nearly as much time devoted to one story, and with so little amount of facts. I actually get most of my political news from C-Span. I consider that as unfiltered and unbiased as possible.
1 87tillwedieIn89 2018-01-07
Right! And as soon as we sorta Russia trump out, we should check into Clinton Obama’s Russia. It’s not one or the other.
1 AdalineTheMaker 2018-01-07
He's been called mentally unfit before the Russia thing ever started.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Right but now the media is switching gears and focusing on that, rather then the probe.
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-07
Which is pretty clearly because there isn’t any news about the probe.
Rest assured, when there is news, it’ll be covered.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Well of course.
Logically, if they had anything to prove it would have come out by now. It’s been like 14 months. You can’t honestly anticipate anything coming from this, other than just fueling uninformed people’s delusions.
Even when it’s proven to be untrue (it isn’t, here’s a secret; all politicians collude with all governments) there will still be half the country referencing it, after having it drilled into their minds for over a year.
Drip, drop
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-07
Mueller’s investigation has been going for eight months, not fourteen.
I honestly anticipate much more coming of this considering people seem to not understand how long these kind of investigations actually take. Watergate took over two years. Whitewater, four.
This thing is moving at light-speed, comparatively, and it is nowhere near over.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
You didn’t address my main point. Trump is not the only President to do this. In fact, they all have; colluded with foreign leaders. The CIA does it every day
It’s just a reality show, we’re all being led on like a rat to a stick with cheese on it.
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-07
I guess that makes a pretty significant difference of opinion between us, then.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
I’m right ;)
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-07
ok
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-07
There's been 4 indictments so far. Did you not hear about those?
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
There are over 4,000 sales indictments. You or I pretending like we know who those people are is foolish.
Irrelevant.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-07
It might be irrelevant to you that 4 dudes from Trumps campaign have been criminally indicted. It isn't irrelevant to the rest of us.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
It might irrelevant to you that all politicians have been bought and paid for by corporations anyway, but to me it’s not.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-07
Then why are you sitting here trying to defend one of them so hard?
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
I’m not. I’m standing up for objectivity. Trump has challenged the mainstream.
He’s either
A) a hero
B) a Trojan Horse (deep state)
C) an absolute ego maniac
He’s not an idiot. The answer isn’t simple. It’s complex. And the answer is very important. There is no combination of the choices; it’s one of the three.
Unlike you, I am waiting till I actually know to pass judgment. I’m not basing it on tabloid nonsense.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-07
You clearly support him. Are you this objective about every politician? How do you feel about Obama?
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
I loved Obama when he got elected and I was in high school. Then I grew up.
And no, I don’t support anyone. Especially not billionaires. I’m just pointing out your logical fallacies.
Believing in politics at all is stupid.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-07
What logical fallacies did you think you pointed out?
1 AdalineTheMaker 2018-01-07
It was only like two days ago the big story was Bannon saying they commuted treason and some are gonna go down for money laundering.
1 bogpiII 2018-01-07
Nothing burger
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-07
Juiciest nothing burger I’ve ever tasted.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-07
The Russian investigation is over? When did they wrap up that investigation?
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
They didn’t, but it’s transitioning out of the news cycle.
1 starry7833378333 2018-01-07
Trump was Trump before he was elected, people still voted for him. He hasn't changed. If they did try to 25th amendment his ass I'd hope that moderates and even liberals would recognize the power we'd have just lost.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
What do you think Pence would do? War on drugs x10? Revoking gay marriage?
1 starry7833378333 2018-01-07
I have no idea but I think he's old school republican establishment and I'm not a fan of any old school career politician.
1 Apersonofinterest666 2018-01-07
Trump will never be impeached. It’s a completely ridiculous plan by delusional lefties. Even if they managed to take the house in 2018 and somehow get an impeachment, remember that Bill Clinton was impeached but I seem to remember he finished his full 8 year term.
1 calebdallas 2018-01-07
Russia.
1 dfu3568ete6 2018-01-07
"Your username triggers me and I have no counterargument so I don't want to speak with you" lol
Following...
">that guy who wrote that book is a shill......I don’t have time for someone who’s going to focus on name calling."
LMAO
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
Right but now the media is switching gears and focusing on that, rather then the probe.
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-07
Which is pretty clearly because there isn’t any news about the probe.
Rest assured, when there is news, it’ll be covered.
1 AdalineTheMaker 2018-01-07
It was only like two days ago the big story was Bannon saying they commuted treason and some are gonna go down for money laundering.
1 UnbearablePenguin 2018-01-07
I guess he should change it since it bothers you so much?
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-07
It might be irrelevant to you that 4 dudes from Trumps campaign have been criminally indicted. It isn't irrelevant to the rest of us.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
I’m not. I’m standing up for objectivity. Trump has challenged the mainstream.
He’s either
A) a hero
B) a Trojan Horse (deep state)
C) an absolute ego maniac
He’s not an idiot. The answer isn’t simple. It’s complex. And the answer is very important. There is no combination of the choices; it’s one of the three.
Unlike you, I am waiting till I actually know to pass judgment. I’m not basing it on tabloid nonsense.
1 Quetzalcoatlwasright 2018-01-07
I loved Obama when he got elected and I was in high school. Then I grew up.
And no, I don’t support anyone. Especially not billionaires. I’m just pointing out your logical fallacies.
Believing in politics at all is stupid.