Can We Qall BS yet?
19 2018-01-11 by KrazyKiwiKid
Assange is still in the Ecuadorian embassy.
Can we call BS on Q's crumbs yet?
And if it is BS, what will all the Q-ist do?
- Go on to the next conspiracy
- Go mental and have a breakdown
- Get angry! Really feckin' angry!!
- Hide
- Cry
submission thingy been reading all about Ecuador/Assange/ UK Govt and it seems obvious Assange is still "illegally" held captive. So Q's crumbs appear a bit eeerrr, stale.
26 comments
1 bradok 2018-01-11
I've never been a Q believer but I would hold off on saying nothing is happening with Assange yet. Ecuador is now looking for 3rd party arbitration and finally granted Assange a passport and access to the country, which they have refused for years. His final hurdle is actually getting out of the Embassy and out of the UK...which is why Ecuador wants a 3rd part to intervene.
There is definitely something going on with Assange, whether or not it has anything to do with Q. So I wouldn't use that as an excuse to dismiss Q, even though I am a skeptic myself.
1 Cobra_Blown 2018-01-11
Did someone confirm he was issued a passport & not just a Ecuadorian ID card, one attribute being it’s required to obtain a passport? Regardless of the validity of the Q posts, I’m quite interested to see how the whole JA & WL situation plays out. (Assuming it’s not all theater & he is indeed still in the embassy & wasn’t renditioned using the Guantanamo express reported to have been sited in London last year iirc when [Kerry or Biden?] were also in London at the time as well as JA having a high profile visitor [Pamela?]. ) If I’m mistaken on the details someone feel free to correct me, it’s appreciated.
1 IAMAExpertInBirdLaw 2018-01-11
I'd imagine Ecuador is tired of this pissing contest with the UK and us and they're looking to get this resolved to push forward with some inducements that have been offered. Economic development being the most likely choice
1 der_titan 2018-01-11
Why would the UK want to arbitrate? JA made a mockery of British law and they want him tried for breaching his bail conditions, and denying him diplomatic status shows they are not interested in a clever work around to arrest.
I understand assange and Ecuador are more unhappy with the situation than the UK and why it is becoming increasingly untenable for them
1 Putin_loves_cats 2018-01-11
I'm sitting here, in the US, not caring one way or the other...
1 dawla_fat_farm 2018-01-11
They've always been stale. The only bits ever validated have all been random details that never amounted to any larger picture. You might as well be blind random guessing.
Look, anyone with 2 braincells can tell that Q is a LARP. He doesn't know shit which is why 80% of his so-called leaks are in the form of questions - he's inviting gullible audiences to use their imagination to fill in the details that he doesn't have, to personalize these speculations in a way that will foster a feeling of attachment and community - to make the speculators defend their speculations even more vociferously. It's a cheap psychological trick in active participation.
1 Lord_Stag 2018-01-11
Eloquent
1 sackajahweeda 2018-01-11
Well you know there are only so many "Spears of Destiny" to go around...heehee.
1 merlestreep 2018-01-11
This is old news
1 ignoremsmedia 2018-01-11
1 stupidfuckingtroll 2018-01-11
Of course we can. Just try asking someone who believes in him why they do. Inevitably they’ll start listing his “leaks”. Then ask if he’s ever leaked anything early or first or otherwise unknown to the public, and suddenly they’ll claim that’s not what he does. And that is they last question they’ll answer.
I’m starting to believe the Q LARP extends all the way into this sub and that his “Q faithfuls” (because at this point it might as well be a religion) are in on the con.
1 NOcomedy 2018-01-11
This is not Netflix. It's intel warfare.
1 sydneybluestreet 2018-01-11
So, explain that photo from Air Force 1.
1 TheKillector 2018-01-11
And the photo in Trumps Twitter with the file name beginning with DOITQ
1 DownWithTopMinds 2018-01-11
-silence from the anti-Q shills-
1 niakarad 2018-01-11
it wasn't a photo from AF1, because it was taken from a different time, it was just from someone on the same route. the image names on twitter are randomly generated, so it would be that Q is a twitter insider, not trump related.
1 DownWithTopMinds 2018-01-11
Source?
1 niakarad 2018-01-11
Does that Q picture look like it was taken around noon(on a mostly sunny day)?
The direct route from where trump was starting and going doesn't go anywhere near where the picture was taken, so people decided it must be the secret AF1 flightpath that went 200 miles out of the way, and they still made good time with that detour. In reality that picture is as much of proof that qanon wasnt on AF1, because it is of the wrong flight path.
And on another note, everything q does is cryptic plausible deniability, but that picture has "af1" in the title? TPTB would be able to find/stop Q a lot faster based on a picture taken inside AF1 than they would from someone predicting an event with any amount of actual clarity.
1 DownWithTopMinds 2018-01-11
How can you tell the flightpath from the picture? It was taken inside the plane right?
Edit: and im not trying to yank your chain, im just trying to wrap my head around it...
1 niakarad 2018-01-11
If you draw a line from where trump left to where he was going, where the picture was taken was more than 200 miles out of the way(and required a path further east to be taken at that angle), trump made good time on the flight, which makes it less believable they went so far out of the way.
1 DownWithTopMinds 2018-01-11
Where can I find that info at?
(Does anyone know where I can find the info this guy is talking about???)
1 niakarad 2018-01-11
Which part? Most of it is in the same infographics circulating about q being on af1.
This is the airports trump was leaving and arriving at
He made the trip in 4.5 hours, but the picture taken was to the south east of hong kong (po toi island is in view in the picture) so a very different route, traveling over the south china sea for no reason. And like I said, does that picture look like it was taken around noon? We have no evidence that was the presidents actual flight path, and the time table doesnt really support it, all we have is a picture someone took while flying past hong kong.
edit: whoops my link is broken by all those parenthesis)
1 DownWithTopMinds 2018-01-11
I see your point now. Thanks for the info niakarad!
1 niakarad 2018-01-11
No problem, I'm glad you were genuinely curious.
1 DownWithTopMinds 2018-01-11
I never said I know everything about these subjects, people seem to expect that from me alot. Keep up the good work mate!
1 FORKinmyDICK 2018-01-11
Why do you think AF1 would HAVE to follow strict flight paths. If anything they would not follow normal ones to be safer...
1 niakarad 2018-01-11
Well if they were too far off the flight path he would have been later. In addition it is safer to fly over land because you can do a landing in the case of mechanical failure. It's a big sky, they don't need 200miles of berth.
1 DownWithTopMinds 2018-01-11
Can you find this photo:
This may be the key to proof
1 MrTinFoilHat187 2018-01-11
He’s been right on several occasions! He states things will happen and they do just sometimes not on the exact schedule he hints at. Julian Assange just got his first passport from Ecuador and can begin to leave. They must be working out a deal so the UK doesn’t immediately arrest him when he sets foot out of the embassy! No one bats a 1000! He states stuff and most of it happens!
1 Globie2017 2018-01-11
Name 1 single (significant) example.
1 jmais 2018-01-11
edit: <sp>
1 MrTinFoilHat187 2018-01-11
1) The Vegas Shooting 2) The NYC Suicide Bomber 3) The Amtrak Train Crash 4) The North Korea Secret Base That Looks like a White Rabbit 5) The Clinton Fire 6) The Atlanta Airport Black Out 7) All activity at the Gitmo There is a ton more
1 cutol 2018-01-11
By giving him more attention you're only feeding him. Ignore and he will disappear.