I think he just loves to play bad cop.

he's a setup to look like a good guy, to pretend to be going after the pedo/baby eater satanists, who has tried to create the soil for ww3 and failed (witness today's events). this Q dude is saying all the right things to make it look like there's an effort to take down the satanists, but in reality what's actually happening is the opposite. a lot of other groups know what he's up to and have deliberately not fallen for his provocations. there has to be an inside break to take these guys down, and the information regarding that has been put in the public domain (witness my earlier comments about human trafficking locations, for instance). and if the public (and not the establishment which is so coopted it can't do shit) doesn't do their own diligence on stopping this crowd, it ain't happening. to enable the elements of the establishment who know what's going on they also need to have the support of the public. so the infrastructure to enable that has to happen. it will happen, but it seems like people are really loathe to take tangible steps in enabling an organized takedown of this group. this group is fundamentally the crown of england crowd. they're behind all of this. the rest of them are all window dressing and lower level.

Wait. If Trump was a puppet to make it just look like we had a pres that wanted to take down the bad guys, wouldn't they have picked someone that is squeaky clean?

Wait. If Trump was a puppet to make it just look like we had a pres that wanted to take down the bad guys, wouldn't they have picked someone that is squeaky clean?

well they can't find someone who is squeaky clean because there aren't any. trump's the best they have. note how he came from outside of politics. he was groomed for this role.

I think he was working toward this role, honestly. I don't see any evidence of "grooming". What "grooming" are you seeing?

are you kidding me? he's had his name in the press since the 80s. this is rare for a business guy. look who he hangs with. look who is on his team. look who is backing him. follow the money. he's the swamp.

How is that "grooming". That is rubbing elbows.

it's grooming the public. it's creating a persona that they think they understand.

That would make sense if only *the public spends most of their effort trying to understand him".

He is literally the opposite of what you are saying.

I think he is a citizen that has a lot of dirt on a lot of people and truly doesn't like the shit that has been going on and is doing his best to stop it.

Is a lot of his jive an act? Sure. Is he working for someone? Yes, the people that elected him.

oh come on. someone writes a storyline. they do this knowing how people react psychologically. he's a character in a storyline. his actions are not at all reformist. you don't reform by hiding more things. that's what you don't do.

Not necessarily, what they really needed was an outsider.

exactly. and that's what they have. guy's trying to trigger ww3. what more info do ppl need?

Maybe I'm misunderstanding. You are saying he's an outsider and also a part of TPTB? I'm going to read your OP again, because I'm lost.

Well he was an outsider from the political platform. At least that how a lot of people saw him.

I think in such a scenario they picked his character to appeal to the "American Dream" of acquiring wealth by having a "self-made millionarie" type sell the idea of prosperity, and his celebrity status makes him liked. Also his unhinged and non-PC demenaour appeals to the part of the demographic that are fed up with the lack of transparency.

Well the good guy image was mostly for his pres. campaign, anyone can agree that it worked beautifully. Now that he's in office, phase 2 of plan is in the works.

right, and the whole idiot left deal was all a setup to make him look reformist. he's not reformed shit. he's removed checks and balances. he's instituted military court shit. there's no transparency except for what he tells us.

Right, its pretty easy to see they want to use him as the subject of blame for anything or everything.

Also, what better way to bring your own globalist puppet into power in the future than to get the entire population to hate the guy their canditate would be running against. Basically, in the 2020 election, people will be willing to vote for literally anyone else, like oprah, (wish I was joking here) who conveniently is the exact opposite on the surface of Trump.

Trump has been the same for the last 3 decades, all thats happening now is he is cracking under the pressure of being held accountable for what he says. He’s a troll and he is an idiot.

He’s a troll and he is an idiot.

that's what they'd like people to think. it's a convenient cover.

Maybe you're right. I just think some think thanks put a plan together using his persona to move the agenda forward.

I mean don't forget that any intelligence agency have hundreds of psychologist that measure and predict how the population reacts to everything. Throw meta data in the mix and you can pretty much control the public's opinion and perception. I'm never 100% sure but I have a hunch something is up.

Oh i definetly think he’s being used now to push other peoples agendas. But i don’t think that was the plan all along, at least not from the American government. But that is just my opinion.

Interesting point.

In his old interviews he was well spoken, thoughtful and well-liked by many people.

Now he is the worlds biggest troll.

I don’t think he was well liked. I think he was tolerated and was a spectacle.

He was better spoken yes, but his idea’s were just as nuts. He was constantly saying things that wouldnt be acceptable from anyone else, it was tolerated because he was rich.

Spot on dude. At least to my way of thinking. I think they used the same startegy to convince us the CIA are a bunch idiots, and this couldn't be further from the truth. Actually convincing us the CIA is stupid was fecking brilliant.

Actually convincing us the CIA is stupid was fecking brilliant.

exactly. this whole thing is well-conceived. it's great theatre.

I have had similar thoughts as well. It really seems like his whole presidency is a massive Psyops to distract from the globalist agenda cos when you peek behind scenes you see the same shit is happening as Obama drone strikes, the war in Afghanistan AFRICOM operations etc.. Not to mention every time there's a vote on a bill there's a distraction with some bogus thing he did or said. I have also postulated that he is that outrageous naturally and instead of getting someone to act they just found someone who already fit the part.

It's called plausible deniability. IMO, Trump is actually trying to shake things up for the better, or he's just another Jesuit/SMOM coadjutor. Who knows, and more importantly, who cares? This is coming from a "US citizen", as well. The system is so far gone, no president or politician can exactly turn the ship around, imo. We're better off just finding an island and creating our own country, imo. Yes, that is how bad things actually are...

The "Great Experiment" failed in the 1700's. Breadcrumbs were left, but, TPTB erase them, and dumbed the people down...

IMO, Trump is actually trying to shake things up for the better

nope. nope. nope. nope. nope.

follow his actions. you don't reform by removing transparency. and you don't reform by threatening nukes.

That's pretty weak, yo'.

no it's not. use your rational mind. i know you have one. watch his acts. they give it away.

Give me some examples that back up what you say.

i just did. this NK hawaii nuke thing. the other things you could look at are his removal of due process, mil courts, and all that stuff. that's classic hitler.

Sources?

for what? for his gitmo stuff? for his cop comments telling them to beat people up? it's all out there man, i thought you watched this shit.

For all the things you claim. This is not hard, that is... unless you are full of shit and spouting it.

here's the thing dude. i know you pay attention. i know you are rational. i know there's a lot of info out there that looks the opposite of what it is. just follow his actions. that's all you need to do. i don't need to explain it. don't take my word for anything. just follow his actions. reason it out.

Cool story. Now, are you going to back up anything you've said? You can try to suck my dick, or something, but I don't switch hit. Are you going to provide it, or not?

i did. what specifically do you want as backup. what have i said that's not already in the public domain. i'll provide it just tell me what specifically you want. there's nothing i've said that isn't already in the public domain. what claim do you need evidence of?

Links. Pretty simple. You can tell me to "google it" all you want, but, it just goes to show your inadequacies in your own argument(s).

i would link you. i'm not sure what you're asking for specifically. i'm not sure what claim you want evidence that isn't already well known. i'll provide it. no joke.

for instance today's events. right? someone tried to nuke hawaii. who would that be? NK, right? who's been trying to trigger or foment an NK war narrative? Trump.

What the government has called "transparency" has been proven to mean "smoke and mirrors".

yes it's broken. i get it. but you don't remove existing processes. that makes it even more smokey. and if you'll notice as broken as the courts are they still, often, do the right thing. it's just that things never go to court. these controllerpants types don't let things go to court. that's one of their hacks.

So, how would you fix it? Why would you not break down existing processes that are demonstrably broken?

well you don't remove transparency. that's what you don't do.

Went to a Jesuit school. Had a hidden hand portrait done.

He has many Jesuit ties, and that troubles me. But, then again, he made some very powerful people nervous at the Catholic dinner him and Hillary went to. He's an enigma, that I'm still trying to figure out. Truly 50/50, not like most people.

yeah he's backed by the romans. it's all there. it's all designed to confuse. but fundamentally who he's selected for his cabinet, who he's bailed out, all of that is classic swamp.

Do you think the same about JFK?

jfk was killed, so no. good question though.

JFK came from a rich Roman Catholic family, though. Deep in bed with the Black Nobility. He faced the same forces Trump is facing. If Trump is legit, and trying to change things (like JFK tried to), would you eat your own tongue?

sure. yes.

sure. yes.

Good to know, even though, I know you're full of shit.

Trump shares so much in common with JFK, yet gets shat on while JFK is praised. How and why, is beyond me, especially in a "conspiracy sub". I'm no "supporter", but you cannot deny that very powerful people are certainly against him.

Good to know, even though, I know you're full of shit.

i'm actually not. and you'll see eventually.

Trump shares so much in common with JFK, yet gets shat on while JFK is praised. How and why, is beyond me, especially in a "conspiracy sub". I'm no "supporter", but you cannot deny that very powerful people are certainly against him.

yes that's right. it's part of the theatre. anyway op deleted his post. they don't want this stuff seen. simple as.

and OP deleted his post. i wonder why.

stopped reading at Irak lol

My bad, english is not my first language and Iraq is spelled differently in my language. You can keep reading, sorry for any other spelling/grammar mistakes.

Im retarded. Should have known better. please accept my apologies. Thought it was a missed typo.

No worries it's all good mate.

Trump starts turning a blind eye to racists and racism. Israel starts kicking out black people bc black people have terrible chatcharter according to Netanyahu. I think tge religious nuts in their 80s want to see bible bullshit fulfilled.

Wait. If Trump was a puppet to make it just look like we had a pres that wanted to take down the bad guys, wouldn't they have picked someone that is squeaky clean?

well they can't find someone who is squeaky clean because there aren't any. trump's the best they have. note how he came from outside of politics. he was groomed for this role.

Not necessarily, what they really needed was an outsider.

Do you think the same about JFK?

I think in such a scenario they picked his character to appeal to the "American Dream" of acquiring wealth by having a "self-made millionarie" type sell the idea of prosperity, and his celebrity status makes him liked. Also his unhinged and non-PC demenaour appeals to the part of the demographic that are fed up with the lack of transparency.